A Report on

Structural Analysis and Design

of Residential Building
(3 & Half story), Block-B

Owner:
Mr. Ram Tandukar
Location:
LMC- ,Kupondol
Structural Analysis and Design Report

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the residential building of Mr. Ram Tandukar
at LMC- , Kupondol, Nepal. The reports consist of the design procedures adopted,
the assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output. During
the design, it is assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well
as the structural design. It is also assumed that the construction will be supervised by
professional engineer.

The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made
by the client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer,
or the alterations to non-structural system is made such that the weight of each
individual floor or the weight of the whole building is altered by more than 10% of
design weight of each floor and the total weight.

The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the
concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be
provided to the client or concerned authorities when needed, upon request. Hence the
building is safe.

ii
Structural Analysis and Design Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: GENERAL DATA ..................................................................................................................... 1

PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN ................................................................................................ 2

PART III: METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 4

PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION........................................................................................................ 6

PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS ...................................................................................................... 8

PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 9

PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS ............................................................................................ 15

iii
PART I: GENERAL DATA
 Introduction

This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and
design of the residence building.

The massive data inputs, design analysis, calculations and outputs of the result are
computer aided by the Structural analysis and design software ETABS, which is a
special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures by
CSI America. It provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to
create, modify, analyze, design, and optimize the structural elements in a building
model.

Based on the final results, the designs have been performed and drawings were
prepared using AutoCAD 2014.

 Building Design Parameters

Nepal is located in boundary between the Indian and Tibetan plates, along which a
relative shear strain of about 2 cm per year has been estimated. The Indian plate is
also sub-ducting at a rate of, thought to be, about 3 cm per year. The existence of the
Himalayan range with the world’s highest peaks is evidence of continued uplift. As a
result, Nepal is very active seismically.

Reinforced concrete buildings may fail due to the either columns are overstressed
and burst due to lack of enough strength to resist the shock of the earth tremor and
vibration or failure of reinforced concrete members like beams at the poor ductile
detailing. Columns also do fail due to short column effect and splicing failure. Beams
fail due to anchorage failure, shear failure and confinement failure.

The building consists of a RCC frame structure, which is essentially an assembly of

cast-in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof design consists of cast-in-
place concrete slabs. Therefore the member sizes or structural elements,
reinforcement details, joint details are considered during design process such that to
meet the design standards for ductile performance of the structure.

For the design of the building, the Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant
design IS 1893:2002 have been referred. According to the IS Code, the seismic zone
for Kathmandu has been taken falling in Zone V with very severe seismic intensity
(zone factor z = 0.36) and accordingly all other parameters like spectral coefficient
(Sa/g) and tremor response period or fundamental natural period (T) were calculated.
After that all design requirements such as seismic weight of building, lateral forces at
different floor levels and different column heads, base shear, distribution of design
forces to different floor levels are considered.

The characteristic compressive strength for concrete of 20 N/mm 2 (M20) was used in
all structural members and characteristic strength of 500 N/mm2 (Fe500) was used
for reinforcing steel.
1
Structural Analysis and Design Report

PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN

The tentative size of structural elements are determined through the preliminary
design so that after analysis the pre assumed dimensions might not deviated
considerably , thus making the final design both safe and economical . Tentative size
of various elements has been determined as follows:

 SLAB
For slab, preliminary design is done according to deflection criteria span /effective
depth = 40*modification factor. (IS 456-2000 Art 24.1)

From deflection criteria, we have,

l   (Cl.23-2.1, p.37, IS456:2000)
d
Where,
 = Basic value of span to effective depth ratios for spans up to spans 10m.
 = a factor which accounts for correction in the values of  for spans greater
than 10m
 = a factors which depends on the stress at service and amount of steel for
tension reinforcement
Area of cross sec tion of steel required
For fy  500, fs  0.58 fy 
Area of cross sec ti on provide
 =a factor which depends on the area of compression reinforcement.
 = a factor for flanged beams which depends on the ratio of web width to flange
width.
We taken,   32

 BEAM
Thumb rule of (d=L/10 to L/12) basis is adopted to consider the preliminary design of
the beam section.
b 1

D 2

i) Depth of beam:
We have,

dbeam =
1 1
to ofspan
10 12
ii) Width of beam:
We have, bbeam = 1 to 2 of d beam
2 3

2
Structural Analysis and Design Report

 COLUMN
Preliminary design of column is done consideration and interior column. For the load
acting in the column, live load is decreased according to IS 875-1978.
Cross-section of the column is adopted considering the economy. Square column
section is adopted in this building project as per the internal aesthetic requirements.
A percentage of steel is taken as 0.8 to 6 percentage of cross section area of
column, but as taking 6% area of steel is more at a laps section so generally % of
steel is taken up to 4% only..

We have,
p Ag  p Ag
P= 0.4 f A  0.67 f A
ck c y sc
 0. 4 f A
ck g
   0.67
100 
f y 100

 STAIRCASE
Stairs is designed as per drawing. Column for stairs boxes is not included in the grid
system but they are assumed to be simply tied with main frame with beam.

3
Structural Analysis and Design Report

PART III: METHODOLOGY

The methodology adopted in the Structural Analysis and Design of Two and half
Storied RCC framed Residential Building has been described below:
1. Data Collection
All the data required for this project work have been taken from different
literatures. Design parameters have been taken from Indian Standard Code of
Practice. Soil test report collect from site.
2. Load Calculation
Load calculations have been done using the IS 875-1987 (Part 1 & Part 2) as
reference. The exact value of unit weights of the material used in the building has
been extracted from the code for the calculation. Thickness of materials was taken as
per design requirement.
2.1 Vertical Load
Loads on slabs may be divided into
i. Dead load - self-weight of slab.
ii. Live load - from relevant codes.
Load on beam are:
a. Self – weight of beam.
b. Load transfer from slab.
c. Load due to wall.
d. Load transfer from staircase.
Load on the columns were calculated by finding out the total dead load and
live loads acting on the columns according to their coverage and adding self – weight
of it.

a.) Self weight of the beam

In ETABS, after fixing the size of beam, software calculates self-weight of
beam itself. Moreover, the self weight of the beam as uniformly distributed load over
the span can be found by multiplying cross-sectional area of beam with unit weight of
reinforce concrete.
b.) Load Transfer from slab to beam
The load of the slab, dead load as well as live load, can be converted to
equivalent uniformly distributed load for beam by two ways.
 Triangulation Load Distribution
 Trapezoidal Load Distribution
c). Load due to wall
The load of wall as uniformly distributed load over the span can be found by
multiplying thickness and height of the wall with unit weight of brick work. Opening
have been calculated and deducted wherever opening such as window, door exist.
Partition load has been taken as 1 kN/m2 area of the slab.

d). Load transfer from staircase

4
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Reaction produce by staircase have been calculated and this reactions have
been changed into uniformly distributed load over the beam by dividing span of
beam.

2.2 Lateral Load Calculation

Lateral loads acting on building are earthquake load only. Earthquake or

seismic load on a building depends upon its geographic location, lateral stiffness and
mass, and it’s reversible. Thus its effect has been considered along both axes of the
building taken one at the time. Due to flat slab roof we have not considered wind
load, also it is not practically used in our context. Hence only seismic load analysis is
carried out. For analysis and design earthquake action, following methods can be
applied.
1. Seismic Coefficient Method.
2. Response Spectrum Method.
Since the height of the building is less than 40m, equivalent static method is
used.
On the basis of IS 1893:2000.

The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear (VB) along any principal
direction shall be determined by the following expression:
VB = Ah.W
 Z I Sa 
VB =      W
2 R g 
3

T  0.075h 4
For RCC frame building
Where,
VB = Base shear
Ah = Designhorizontal acc. spectrum
Z = Zone Factor
I = Importance Factor
R = Response Reduction Factor
Sa
= Average Response Acceleration Coefficient
g
W = Seismic Weight of building
T = Natural period of vibration
h = Height of Building in m
d = Base Dimension at Plinth level

5
Structural Analysis and Design Report

PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION

Design loads (imposed and earthquake) standard are referred to Indian Standard
Code of Practice IS: 875 (Part 2) 1987 for design loads for building and structures.
Reduction in Imposed Loads on Floors as allowed by the IS Code has been also
applied. Dead loads are calculated as per the mass and density of the structural and
other building elements.
The dead loads and live loads are calculated as indicated below to start with for
general guidance.
Loading assumption:
A. Dead Load
Assuming slab thickness of 125 mm
Self Load of slab = 125*25/1000
= 3.125 kN/m2
50mm thick screed + punning on floor
Intensity = 1.00 kN/m2
Total Dead Load = 4.125 kN/m2

B. Live Load
IS: 875 (Part 2)-1987
Normal Residential building: 2 kN/m 2

Roof:
LL = 1.5 kN/ m2

C. Column assuming size, C1 =300mmx300mm

D. Grid Beam & Secondary assuming size of 230mmx350mm

F. Exterior Wall assuming wall thickness of 230mm

Wall Load = 0.23(W)*2.5(H)*19.20
= 11 kN/m
Deducting 30% for openings,
Wall Load = 0.23(W)*2.5(H)*19.20* 0.7
= 7.73 kN/m
G. Partition Wall,
Wall Load = 0.115(W)*2.5(H)*19.20
= 5.52 kN/m

H. Parapet Wall
Load = 0.115(W)*1(H)*19.20
= 2.21 kN/m

 Static Load Cases

Name Type
Dead Linear Static
Live Linear Static
WALL Linear Static
FF Linear Static
Ex Linear Static
Ey Linear Static
E Linear Static
ROOF LL Linear Static

6
Structural Analysis and Design Report

 Seismic Load Calculation

Coefficient Calculation
Based on IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of
structures,

Calculation of earthquake loads using Seismic coefficient method:

The design horizontal seismic coefficient,

Ah = Z*I*Sa/2Rg

Where Z=zone factor

I = Importance factor
R = Response reduction factor
Sa/g = average response acceleration coefficient

The approximate fundamental natural period of vibration (T a) in seconds, of moment-

resisting frame buildings with brick infill panels,
may be estimated by the empirical expression:

Ta = 0.075*h0.75

Where,
h = Height of Building in meter, includes the basement storey and

I = 1 (6.4.2, IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002)

Z = 0.36
Ah= ZISa/2Rg

Ta = 0.075*h0.75
= 0.075*11.48.75
=0.46sec

Sa/g = 2.5(from graph in page no 16, 1893 (part 1)-2002)

R = 5 (Page 23)

Ah = ZISa/2Rg
= 0.36*1*2.5/ (2*5)
= 0.09

The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear (VB) along any principal
direction is determined by the following expression

VB = Ah*W
=0.09*2931.2512 KN
=263.8126 KN

Where, Ah = the design horizontal seismic coefficient

W = Seismic weight of the building

7
Structural Analysis and Design Report

PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS

 ARCHITECTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Types of building Residential Building
Types of structural system Reinforced Concrete Frame
Number of stories Three & Half story
Design provision for future extension No
Story Height 2.87 m
Height of parapet wall 1.0 m
Total height of the Building 11.48m
External wall/ some internal wall 230 mm
Few internal wall 115 mm
Plaster thickness 12 mm
 CONSTRUCTION SITE
Soil type Type II
Bearing capacity 120 KN/m2
 DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS
Slab thickness125mm
Beam size (mm) 230x350
Column size (mm) 300x300
 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Cement Ordinary Portland cement
Grade of concrete M20 for the entire member
Grade of steel Fe500 for both main and shear
reinforcement
 ASSESSMENT OF UNIT LOADS OF MATERIALS
DENSITY OF MATERIALS
Reinforced concrete 25.0KN/m3
Brick masonry 19.20KN/m3
Partition wall 1.00KN/m2
Floor finishes 1.00KN/m2
Ceiling Plaster 0.5KN/m2
 ASSESSMENT OF LIVE LOAD
Unit loads on floor
Bed Rooms 2.0KN/m2
Corridors 3.0 KN/m2
Stairs 3.0 KN/m2
Roof (accessible) 1.5 KN/m2
Roof (Non accessible) 0.750 KN/m2

 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Analysis method adopted for EQ resistant design : Seismic coefficient
Level of design : Professionally engineered
structure
Total number of design load cases considered : 13
Seismic zoning factor : 0.36
Basic seismic coefficient : 0.09
Important factor : 1.0
Structural performance factor : 1.0
Weight of structure : 2931.2512 KN
Horizontal base shear at plinth level : 263.8126 KN

8
Structural Analysis and Design Report

PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

 Load Combinations taken in Analysis

1.1.5(DL+LL)
2. 1.2(DL+LL+EQX)
3. 1.2(DL+LL-EQX)
4. 1.2(DL+LL+EQZ)
5.1.2(DL+LL-EQZ)
6. 1.5(DL+EQX)
7. 1.5(DL-EQX)
8. 1.5(DL+EQZ)
9. 1.5(DL-EQZ)
10. 0.9DL+1.5EQX
11. 0.9DL-1.5EQX
12. 0.9DL+1.5EQZ
13. 0.9DL-1.5EQZ

Analysis Detail:

Fig : Typical Floor Plan

9
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Fig : ELEVATIONAL VIEW

Fig : 3D VIEW
10
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Fig : Dead Load (Floor Finish)

Fig : Dead Load (Wall load)

11
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Fig : Live Load

RESULT OUTPUT
 Support Reactions

12
Structural Analysis and Design Report

13
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Axial Force Diagram (Sample)

Shear Force Diagram (Sample)

14
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Bending Moment Diagram (Sample)

Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case
or load combination.

Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story drifts Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQx Top Story Story4
Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story Base

15
Structural
ral Analysis and Design Report

Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Story4 11.48 Top 0.000956 0.00002
Story3 8.61 Top 0.001184 0.000073
Story2 5.74 Top 0.001674 0.000083
Story1 2.87 Top 0.001329 0.000071
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case
or load combination.

16
Structural
ral Analysis and Design Report

Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story drifts Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQy Top Story Story4
Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story Base

Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Story4 11.48 Top 0.000033 0.000868
Story3 8.61 Top 0.000163 0.001133
Story2 5.74 Top 0.000121 0.001536
Story1 2.87 Top 0.000086 0.001266
Base 0 Top 0 0

17
Structural Analysis and Design Report

PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS

 COLUMN DESIGN RESULT

Fig: Column rebar along grid A

Fig: Column rebar along grid B

18
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Fig: Column rebar along grid C

Fig: Column rebar along grid D

19
 Structural
ral Analysis and Design Report

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm)
mm) LLRF
Story1 C2 106 C(12*12) UDCon13 0 2870 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
300 300 58 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN
kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
-54.4459 43.7294 -3.3372
3.3372 1.0889 1.0889 1293 1.44

Axial Force and Biaxial

Biax Moment Factors
K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN
kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.73924 2520 -2.4993 0 1.0889
Minor Bend(M2) 0.689543 2520 17.7901 0 1.0889

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 27.5996 43.1009 29.0396 27.5996 332.53
Minor, Vu3 25.7334 43.1009 29.0396 24.1635 332.53

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

20
 Structural Analysis and Design Report

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
900 12.9 1294.789 286.8179 -54.4459 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.878 300 6.21 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.878 300 5.792 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

BEAM DESIGN RESULT

Fig: Beam rebar in GF

21
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Fig: Beam rebar in First Floor

Fig: Beam rebar in Second Floor

22
 Structural
ral Analysis and Design Report

Fig:
g: Beam rebar in Top Floor

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B7 7 B(9*14) UDCon7 2849.2 2999.2 1

23
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
230 350 230 0 25 25

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-57.4167 2.9415 44.5441 0

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-57.4167 4.3634 0 -61.7801

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, M u3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -61.7801 534 0 534 173
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 267 0 0 267

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
77.9617 41.0062 57.4184 55.0658 489.57

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
2.9415 44.5441 200 320 281.66

24
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Standards and Codes of Practice:

1. Indian Standards Code of Practice For Plain & Reinforced Concrete IS:
456-2000; Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), July 2000, New Delhi
2. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-2000 Special Publication:
16 Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
3. Nepal National Building Code, NBC 105: 1994, Department of Housing
and Physical Planning.
4. Handbook on Concrete reinforcement and Detailing, Special
Publication: 34 [SP: 34 –1987].
5. Explanatory Handbook on Code for Earthquake Engineering IS: 1893 –
2002, Beau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
6. Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to
Seismic forces- Indian Code of Practice IS 13920: 1993, Beau of Indian
Standards (BIS), New Delhi.

ANNEX
25
Structural Analysis and Design Report

STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Building Elements As per submitted Design

Building Structure Type:- Frame Structure

No. of story applied for permit:- 4
No. of story consider:- 4
If CAD is used ETABS 2016
No. of story considered in structure
design provision for further extension No

Total height(h) of structure in (m) 11.48m

Unit Weight of Material

Steel 78.50 KN/^3
RCC 25KN/^3
Brick Masonary 19.2KN/^3
LIVE LOAD

Occupancy Load (Uniformaly distributed load

In KN/M^2) for rooms & kitchen 2

Occupancy Load (Uniformaly distributed load

In KN/M^2) for stairecase & Balcony 3

Wind Zone 2
Basic Wind speed(in m/s) 47
Adopted code for seismic design IS 1893
Sub soil category Medium (Type-2)
Bearing Capacity of soil(KN/M^2) 120 KN/M^2

Seismic Weight(In KN) 2931.2512 KN

Base Shear, Vb(In KN) 263.8126 KN
Seismic coifficent (Ah)x,y 0.09
Fundamental Time Period of the building
Along X(Tx) (in seconds) 0.46 sec

Fundamental Time Period of the building

Along X(Tx) (in seconds) 0.46 sec
Response reduction factor(R) 5
Seismic zoning factor (Z) 0.36
26
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Importance Factor(I) 1

(Sa/g) along X 2.5

(Sa/g) along Y 2.5
Maximum inter-story drift 0.002
Corresponding story ht. for maximum
Inter story drift 8.61m

Concreat grade in structure M20 (for All)

Reinforcement steel grade Fe500 (for all)

SLAB DESIGN

Boundary condition of Slab:-

Two Adjacent Edges
Discontinuous)

Eff. Thickness of Slab : 105mm

Short span of critical Slab panel(L): 3550mm
L/D for the corresponding Slab: 34
Basic L/D ratio: 46
Req. modification factor 1.6
Tension reinforcement: 1.22
Actual Modification factor: 1.8

Req. Tension reinforcement(Ast.): 0.2

Provided(Ast.): 0.33

BEAM

Eff. Depth of Beam: 320mm

Critical span of beam: 3810mm
Basic L/D ratio: 20
Calculate critical span to eff.
Depth ratio: 12

COLUMN
Critical col. Height: 2.87m
Mim. Size of column: (300X300)mm
Short col. Eff. Consider Yes
Mim. Longitudinal RCC area of provided: 1
27
Structural Analysis and Design Report

Provided RCC (8-16), (4-16+4-12)

Desing Philosophy: Limit state Method

LOAD COMBINATION:

1.5
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5
0.9
1.5

FOUNDATION:

Types of Foundation: Isolated,Comb., Strip, strap.

Size of Strap Beam 12’’X18’’

Size of Foundation:
(6’0’’X6’0’’), (5’0’’X5’0’’),
(5’0’’X8’0’’),(5’X14’3’’)

Min. depth of fond.: 1.5m

28
 Design of isolated foundation
Pleft(X)(unfactored) 353.20 KN Area req 3.24
KN Width prov 1.83
Soil bearing 120 KN/m2 Total Length 1.77
Cent Col Size 0.3 m provided length 1.83
Cornor Col Size 0.3 m Left Projection
Dist betw. Col. Center to center m Right Projection

CG/from Left of
0 Force
Max P 529.8 m
Net upward soil pressure = 158.20 KN/m2 Check Value 0.3
m
BENDING MOMENT about x-x passing through the face of the column84.71 KN/m maxim projection
0.000
d calculated from moments = 129.51 mm

Check for two way shear ok

D= 450 Ast mim.= 865.224

d= 394 mm mm2

5.943 Ast2 171390 Ast 84713717.21 =0

Ast at bottom 503.05 mm2 865.22 mm2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 provide spacing 1=50 mm

Grade of concrete M 20
Check for one way shear
at d distance (Vu)= 107.41 kN
Nominal shear stress(Tv)= 0.15 N/mm2
% of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.19
shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel = 0.31 Ok for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear

concreate capacity = 1222842.97 N

From load = 453604.61 N
check ok
Development length
Ld= 679.69 mm
Ld available 905 > 679.69
Ok
 Design of Combined foundation
Pleft(X)(unfactored) 116.00 KN Area req 2.94 CG/from Left of Force
Pright(Y)(Unfactored) 205.00 KN Width prov 1.50 m
Soil bearing 120 KN/m2 Total Length 1.96 Check Value
Cent Col Size 0.3 m provided length 2.4 m
Cornor Col Size 0.3 m Left Projection 0.00 0.15
Dist betw. Col. Center to center 1.57 m Right Projection 0.75 0.15

1.00
Max P 307.5
2
Net upward soil pressure = 133.75 KN/m 2.62
Net upward soil pressure along
length = 200.63 KN/m
maxim projection
B.M under colm X= 2.26 KN-m 0.15
B.M under colm Y= 2.26 KN-m
dis 0.87 from left
dis 1.53 from right
Maximum hooging Moments -49.35 KN-m from left
Maximum hooging Moments -189.53 KN-m from right
max moments 2.26 KN-m
d calculated from moments = 23.35 mm

Check for two way shear ok

D= 450 Ast mim.= 709.2
2
d= 394 mm mm

13.17 13.17
2
4.23012E-05 Ast -1 Ast 13.17 =0

Ast at bottom 13.18 mm2 709.20 mm

2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 provide spacing = 150 mm

-346.94 -1332.33
2
4.23012E-05 Ast -1 Ast 346.94

Ast At top Ast. 352.19 mm2 709.20 mm

2

12 dia spacing = 236.89 mm provide spacing = 150 mm

Grade of concrete M 20
Check for one way shear
at d distance (Vu)= -79.05
Nominal shear stress(Tv)= -0.13
% of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.19
shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel = 0.32 Ok for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear
concreate capacity = 1222842.97 N

From load = 243081.19 N

check ok

lateral distance 0.6

Transverse reinforcement
W= 205 KN/m Ast min = 514.4064
B.M = 36.90 KN-M mm2

transverse reinforcement dis.(b)= 1088 mm 215.30

2
5.83196E-05 Ast -1 Ast 215.30

Ast. Required 218.07 mm2 514.41 mm

2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 mm provide spacing= 150.00 mm

for 12 dia.
 Design of Combined foundation
Pleft(X)(unfactored) 206.50 KN Area req 6.55 CG/from Left of Force
Pright(Y)(Unfactored) 212.00 KN
Pright(Z)(Unfactored) 269.00 KN Width prov 1.52 m
Soil bearing 125 KN/m2 Total Length 4.31 Check Value
Cent Col Size 0.3 m provided length 4.34 m
Cornor Col Size 0.3 m Left Projection 0.60 0.75
Dist betw. 1st Col. to 2nd Col 1.21 m
Dist betw. 2nd Col. to 3rd col 1.8 m Right Projection 0.60 0.75

1.02
Max P 403.5
2
Net upward soil pressure = 156.33 KN/m 3.3
Net upward soil pressure along
length = 237.62 KN/m
maxim projection
B.M under colm X= 66.83 KN-m 0.75
B.M under colm Y= 66.83 KN-m
dis 1.30 from left
dis 3.04 from right
Maximum hooging Moments 30.42 KN-m from left
Maximum hooging Moments 172.82 KN-m from right
max moments 172.82 KN-m
d calculated from moments = 202.96 mm

Check for two way shear ok

D= 450 Ast mim.= 718.656
2
d= 394 mm mm

389.93 389.93
2
4.17446E-05 Ast -1 Ast 389.93 =0

Ast at bottom 396.49 mm2 718.66 mm

2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 provide spacing = 125 mm

213.85 1214.86
2
4.17446E-05 Ast -1 Ast 1214.86

Ast At top Ast. 1283.64 mm2 1283.64 mm

2

12 dia spacing = 133.81 mm provide spacing = 125 mm

Grade of concrete M 20
Check for one way shear
at d distance (Vu)= 48.95
Nominal shear stress(Tv)= 0.08
% of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.23
shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel = 0.32 Ok for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear
concreate capacity = 1222842.97 N

From load = 328207.87 N

check ok

lateral distance 0.61

Transverse reinforcement
W= 265.4605263 KN/m Ast min = 514.4064
B.M = 49.39 KN-M mm2

transverse reinforcement dis.(b)= 1088 mm 288.17

2
5.83196E-05 Ast -1 Ast 288.17

Ast. Required 293.18 mm2 514.41 mm

2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 mm provide spacing= 150.00 mm

for 12 dia.
Project info:
Ram Tandukar-B
Data: Status of designe:
Exterior column load [KN].unfactored = 253.5 TRUE
Interior column load [KN].unfactored = 353.2 .
Load factor = 1
Distance between column center lines[m] = 3
Depth of foundation Df [m] = 0.35
Allowable bearing capacity of soil [KN/sq.m] = 120
Width of ext. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.3
Width of ext. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.3
Width of int. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.3
Width of int. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.3
Breadth of strap beam [m] = 0.3
Eccentricity of exterior load from footing [m] = 0.75
R.C designation : Fcu [N/sq.mm] = 20
reinf. Strength : Fy [N/sq.mm] = 500
density of soil [KN/cu.m] 19
Calculation:
reaction of ext.footing R1 338.00 [KN]
geo. reaction of ext.footing R1T 357.83 [KN]
Req. ext. footing 2.98 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.72682

reaction of int.footing R2 268.70 [KN]

geo. reaction of int.footing R2T 284.46 [KN]
Req. int. footing 2.37 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.53965

Use dimensions for ext.footing L= 1.8 [m] Area prov.d 3.24 109%
B= 1.8 [m] in strap direction

Use dimensions for int.footing L= 1.6 [m] Area prov.d 2.56 108%
B= 1.6 [m] in strap direction
check dim TRUE
Designe of strap beam:
Breadth of strap beam [m] 0.3
depth of strap beam from shear d 367.40 [mm]
Use depth d 400 [mm] TRUE
total depth H 450 [mm]
fcu = 20 N/smm fy = 500 N/smm

Width = 300 mm Max. B.M. Mu¯ = 133 kNm

Depth = 400 mm Max. S.F. Vu = 197 kN
Mu = 54 kNm
K = M/bd2fcu = 0.19 N/mm
2
A's required 168.26 mm2
Z = 264.14 mm As required 1326.53 Top mm2 As prvd. 101%
2 2
As bottom = 600.00 mm As provided 1340 Top mm TRUE
2
Design shear v= 1.93 N/mm Diameter of stirrups 8 mm No. legs 2
2
Design concrete shear vc = 0.72 N/mm Spacing of stirrups reqd. 241 mm
check shear at col face TRUE

Designe of exterior footing:

Net presure under ext. footing 116.57 [KN/sq.m] TRUE

fcu 20 N/smm fy 500 N/smm

Ult. column load 338.00 [KN] Safe bearing capacity 120 [KN/sq.m]
Self weight 51.03 [KN] Overburden height -0.1 m A prvd.
2
Overburden -11.34 [KN] Area of footing reqd. 2.17 m TRUE
2
Total load 377.69 [KN] Area of footing provided 3.24 m L reqd.
Net upward pressure ult. 116.57 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness 450 [mm] 1.21
Short span Long span B/W
Width B= 1.80 m Length L= 1.80 m 1.00
Column width 300.00 mm Column breadth 300 mm
Max. cantilever proj. 1.50 m Max. cantilever proj. 0.75 m As min
Max. B.M. /m width 131.14 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 33 kNm 512

K = M/bd2fcu 0.045 N/mm2 K = M/bd2fcu 0.011 N/mm2 No. of bars

Z 361.87 mm Z 374 mm 14
As required /m width 833.12 [mm] As required /m width 201 [sq.mm] 14
Diameter of bars 12 [mm] Diameter of bars 12 [mm]
Spacing of bars 125 [mm] Number of bars/side 125 [mm] As prvd. TRUE
As provided/m width 905 [sq.mm] As provided/m width 905 [sq.mm] 109%
449%
Punch shear 88.15 [KN] Dist. to critical section 750 [mm]
Punch shear stress 0.04 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 87 [KN]
Allow.shear stress 0.39 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress 0.23 [N/sq.mm] TRUE
Designe of interior footing:
Net presure under int. footing 117.21 [KN/sq.m] TRUE

fcu 20 N/smm fy 500 N/smm

Ult. column load 268.7 [KN] Safe bearing capacity 120 [KN/sq.m]
Self weight 45 [KN] Overburden height -0.2 m A prvd.
2
Overburden -13 [KN] Area of footing reqd. 1.72 m TRUE
2
Total load 300 [KN] Area of footing provided 2.56 m L reqd.
Net upward pressure ult. 117 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness 500 [mm] 1.08
Short span Long span B/W
Width B= 1.60 m Length L= 1.60 m 1.00
Column width 300 mm Column breadth 300 mm
Max. cantilever proj. 0.65 m Max. cantilever proj. 0.65 m As min
Max. B.M. /m width 25 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 25 kNm 577

K = M/bd2fcu 0.007 N/mm

2
K = M/bd2fcu 0.006 N/mm2 No. of bars
Z 410 mm Z 422 mm 10
As required /m width 139 [mm] As required /m width 135 [sq.mm] 10
Diameter of bars 12 [mm] Diameter of bars 12 [mm]
Spacing of bars 150 [mm] Number of bars/side 150 [mm] As prvd. TRUE
As provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] As provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] 544%
559%
Punch shear 0 [KN] Dist. to critical section 325 [mm]
Punch shear stress 0.000 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 38 [KN]
Allow.shear stress 0.35 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress 0.09 [N/sq.mm] TRUE
DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB
Design Data
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 20 N/mm
2

Length of short span, Lx = 3.55 m fy = 500 N/mm

2

Length of long span, Ly = 3.81 m

Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm

Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 125 mm ; Effective depth, d = 101 mm
Effective span, lx = 3.55 m (or) 3.421 m whichever is less; d = 3.421 m
ly = 3.81 m (or) 3.681 m whichever is less; d = 3.681 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.08 < 2 ; Here, (ly / lx ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab

Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.125 x 25 = 3.13 KN/m2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m
2

Finishes load on slab = 1.20 KN/m2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m

2

Live Load on slab = 2.0 KN/m2

Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.33 KN/m2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 2.0 KN/m2
2
Factored Design Load w = 9.50 KN/m

Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)

Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous For this support condition,
Short span coefficient for (ly / lx ) = 1.08, Long span coefficient,
For negative moment, ax = 0.0518 For negative moment, ay = 0.047
For positive moment, ax = 0.0390 For positive moment, ay = 0.035

Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x 2 & My = ay w l x 2
Mu 2 pt Ast , min 2
Mu / bd Ast, req = (0.12/100) bD = 150 mm
2 2
KNm N/mm % mm
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 4.34 0.43 0.1223 124
At supports, 5.76 0.56 0.1605 162 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
For Long span, supports for short span (Ast pro. = 335 mm2 )
At mid span, 3.89 0.45 0.1281 129 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
At supports, 5.23 0.60 0.1724 174 supports for long span (Ast pro. = 335 mm2 )

Check for Deflection

Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.33 %
fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 107
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,
Modification factor = 1.8
Allowable (Span / deff ) ratio = 41.4
Effective depth required = 83 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK
Column reinforcement details
Vertical
Floor Type Grid points Size Stirrups Remarks
reinforcement
Foundation ,
C1 Grid:- B1,B6,C4 300X300 8-16 8 mm @100 Concrete
GF, FF, SF

C2 Other All 300X300 4-16+4-12

mm at height M20/rebar
Top floor C1 300X300 4-16+4-12 h/4 and 150 Fe415/Fe500

C2 300X300 4-16+4-12

mm onwards
Note: grid names of column retain their position as per analysis

Slab reinforcement details

Reinf. along Reinf. along
Type Size(m) Slab thickness cover
short span long span
S1 (Slab) 3.55X3.81 8 mm @150c/c 8 mm @150c/c 125 mm 20mm
Beam reinforcement details
FLOOR (type) Size (m) Grid points Reinforcement Stirrups Side face reinf.
support (top) mid (bottom)
Ground floor, X & Y Axis Same
2-16 (reg) + 1-16 2-16 (reg) + 1-12
BM 230x350 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
(extra) (extra)
First floor
2-16 (reg) + 1-16 2-16 (reg) + 1-12
BM 230x350 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
(extra) (extra)
Sec. floor, & Top Floor
BM 230x350 2-16 (regular) 2-16 (regular)

Tie beam
Tie beam 230x300 3-12 (regular) 3-12 (regular) 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
Strap beam

Strap beam 300x450 9'-10'' 3-20+2-16 (reg) 3-16 (regular) 8 mm dia @100/125 c/c 2-16(regular)

Summary of Footings
Depth D d0 dia Provide
Provided Size of Description of Grid name of
S.N Spacing
Footing Footing Df (ft) (inch) (inch) (mm)
(inch )
ISOLATED Footing
1 6'-0" X 6'-0'' Grid:- A3,C2,C4,C6,D4 5 18 10 12mm 6

2 5'-0" X 5'-0'' Grid:- A1,A5,B6,D2,D6 5 18 10 12mm 6

Combined Footing
1 5'-0" X 8'-0'' Grid:- (B1-B2) 5 18 18 12mm 5
Strip Footing
1 5'-0" X 14'-3'' Grid:- (B3-B4-B5) 5 18 18 12mm 5