New DOC Document
New DOC Document
New DOC Document
PART - A
3. Define “Minutes”
In business and organizational contexts, "minutes" refer to written or recorded
notes or summaries of the proceedings, discussions, decisions, and actions taken
during a meeting. These minutes serve as an official record of what transpired
during the meeting and are typically prepared by a designated individual known
as the secretary or minute-taker.
10. What are the provisions of winding up under Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 ?
Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016, the provisions for
winding up primarily deal with the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP)
and liquidation process for insolvent companies. Here are the key provisions
related to winding up under the IBC:
PART - B
2. (a) What are the key responsibilities and power of the board of
directors during a Board Meeting?
During a board meeting, the board of directors holds significant
responsibilities and powers to oversee and govern the affairs of the company.
Key responsibilities and powers of the board of directors during a board
meeting include:
Financial Oversight: The board oversees the company's financial affairs and
ensures the integrity of financial reporting. Directors review and approve
financial statements, budgets, capital expenditure plans, and other financial
reports during board meetings. They also monitor the company's financial
performance and compliance with accounting standards and regulatory
requirements.
Record Date: The company establishes a record date, also known as the
dividend date, which is the date on which shareholders must be on record as
owners of the company's stock in order to receive the dividend. Shareholders
who own the company's stock on or before the record date are entitled to
receive the dividend.
Intimation to ROC: Upon filing Form DIR-12, the ROC updates the company's
records to reflect the appointment of the additional director. The appointment
becomes effective from the date of filing Form DIR-12 with the ROC.
Neglect of Duties: Directors and officers have fiduciary duties to act in the best
interests of the company and its stakeholders. Mismanagement may occur when
directors and officers fail to fulfill their duties, such as by neglecting to monitor the
company's affairs, making decisions without proper deliberation or due diligence, or
failing to exercise reasonable care and skill in their roles.
Funding: The company funds the share buyback using available cash reserves,
internally generated funds, or by raising debt financing. In some cases,
companies may use proceeds from asset sales or divestitures to finance share
repurchases.
17. Write down the different between AGM and Extra General Meeting.
Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Extraordinary General Meeting
(EGM), also known as Extra General Meeting, are two types of general
meetings held by companies, each serving different purposes. Here are the
key differences between AGM and EGM:
Frequency:
AGM: An AGM is held annually, as the name suggests. It must be held
within a specific timeframe prescribed by company law, typically within
a certain number of months after the end of the company's financial
year.
EGM: An EGM, on the other hand, is called as and when necessary,
outside the regular schedule of AGMs. It can be convened at any time
to address urgent or extraordinary matters that require shareholder
approval.
Purpose:
AGM: The primary purpose of an AGM is to conduct routine business
that is required to be addressed annually, such as approving financial
statements, electing directors, appointing auditors, declaring dividends,
and considering shareholder proposals.
EGM: EGMs are convened to address specific matters that cannot wait
until the next AGM. These may include significant corporate
transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions, capital restructuring,
CORPORATE LAW
changes to the company's articles of association, or any other matters
requiring shareholder approval.
Agenda:
AGM: The agenda of an AGM typically includes standard items
prescribed by company law or the company's articles of association,
such as approval of financial statements, director elections,
appointment of auditors, and other routine business matters.
EGM: The agenda of an EGM is focused on the specific matters for
which the meeting was convened. It may include one or more
resolutions related to the purpose of the meeting, with each resolution
requiring shareholder approval.
Notice Period:
AGM: Companies are required to provide shareholders with advance
notice of the AGM within a specified timeframe as mandated by
company law or the company's articles of association. This notice
period allows shareholders to prepare and attend the meeting.
EGM: Similarly, companies must provide shareholders with advance
notice of an EGM, but the notice period may be shorter than that
required for an AGM, especially in urgent situations where timely action
is necessary.
Quorum:
AGM: The quorum for an AGM is typically determined by company law
or the company's articles of association. It represents the minimum
number of shareholders or shares required to be present or
represented at the meeting to validly conduct business.
EGM: Similarly, the quorum for an EGM is determined by company law
or the company's articles of association and may differ from the
quorum requirement for an AGM.
In while both AGMs and EGMs are general meetings of shareholders, they
differ in terms of frequency, purpose, agenda, notice period, and quorum
requirements. AGMs are held annually to address routine business matters,
while EGMs are convened as needed to address specific extraordinary matters
requiring shareholder approval.
18. What steps are to be not taken if dividend is belated claimed by the
shareholder?
If a dividend is belatedly claimed by a shareholder, certain steps should be
avoided to ensure that the situation is handled appropriately and in compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements. Here are some steps that should not be taken:
Ignoring the Claim: Ignoring or disregarding the shareholder's claim for a belated
dividend is not advisable. Shareholders have a legal right to claim dividends that are
CORPORATE LAW
rightfully owed to them, and failing to address their claims promptly could lead to
dissatisfaction, disputes, or legal action.
Refusing to Pay: Refusing to pay the belated dividend without valid justification
could expose the company to legal risks, including breach of contract or fiduciary
duty, shareholder lawsuits, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational damage. Companies
should carefully evaluate the shareholder's claim and ensure that any refusal to pay is
based on legitimate grounds supported by evidence.
The disclosure of interest allows the board and other stakeholders to assess the
situation objectively and take appropriate steps to manage or mitigate any conflicts of
interest. Depending on the nature and significance of the director's interest, the board
may take various actions, such as:
. Recusal: The director with the disclosed interest may be required to abstain from
participating in discussions or voting on the matter to avoid any perception of bias or
impropriety.
. Independent Review: The board may appoint an independent committee or advisor to
review the proposed transaction or arrangement and provide recommendations to the
board.
. Approval Process: The board may require additional scrutiny, documentation, or
approval processes for transactions involving conflicts of interest, such as obtaining
approval from disinterested directors or shareholders.
. Disclosure to Shareholders: In some cases, particularly for significant transactions,
the company may be required to disclose the director's interest to shareholders in
accordance with legal or regulatory requirements.
20. What is the difference between National Company Law Tribunal and
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal?
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law
Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) are specialized quasi-judicial bodies established under
the Companies Act, 2013 in India. While both tribunals deal with matters related to
corporate law, insolvency, and company disputes, there are key differences between
them:
Jurisdiction:
National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): The NCLT has original
jurisdiction over a wide range of matters, including company law cases,
mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructuring, insolvency and bankruptcy
proceedings, and matters related to oppression and mismanagement. It
adjudicates cases filed by or against companies, creditors, shareholders, and
CORPORATE LAW
other stakeholders under various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and
other related laws.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The NCLAT
functions as an appellate tribunal, hearing appeals against orders passed by the
NCLT and other authorities under the Companies Act, 2013 and related laws.
It reviews decisions, orders, or judgments of the NCLT and provides a forum
for parties aggrieved by such decisions to seek redressal.
Hierarchy:
NCLT: The NCLT is the primary adjudicatory authority at the first instance,
with jurisdiction to hear and decide cases filed before it.
NCLAT: The NCLAT operates at a higher level in the hierarchy, serving as
the appellate body that reviews decisions of the NCLT and certain other
authorities. Its decisions can be further appealed to the Supreme Court of
India, the highest judicial authority in the country.
Composition:
NCLT: The NCLT is composed of judicial members and technical members,
including retired judges, judicial officers, and professionals with expertise in
corporate law, insolvency, finance, and related fields. These members are
appointed by the central government.
NCLAT: The NCLAT is headed by a Chairperson and comprises judicial and
technical members, similar to the NCLT. Its members are appointed by the
central government and may include retired judges of the Supreme Court or
High Courts, as well as legal and financial experts.
Functions:
In summary, while both the NCLT and the NCLAT play important roles in the
adjudication and resolution of corporate disputes and insolvency matters in India, the
NCLT has original jurisdiction over a broader range of matters, whereas the NCLAT
serves as the appellate tribunal that reviews decisions of the NCLT and other
authorities.