Ind As 19
Ind As 19
Ind As 19
1
IND AS ON LIABILITIES
OF THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
UNIT 1:
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 19: EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
State the objective and scope of Ind AS 19
Define the terms relating to employee benefits, classification of plans,
net defined benefit liability (asset) and defined benefit cost
Examine the four categories of employee benefits (short-term, post-
employment, other long- term and termination benefits)
Recognise and measure all short term employee benefits, short term
paid absences and account for profit sharing and bonus plans
Distinguish between defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans
Account for multiemployer plans, state plans and insured benefits
Recognise and measure defined benefit plans that share risks between
entities under common control
Recognise, measure and disclose defined contribution plans
Account for the constructive obligation plans under defined benefit plan
UNIT OVERVIEW
Ind AS 19
Definitions Employee
relating to Benefits
Recognition and
Disclosure Measurement: of Plan
Assets
Curtailments and
Settlements of a
defined benefit plan
1.2 SCOPE
The concept of ‘Employee Benefits’ has evolved over the years to encompass more than just the
salaries, wages and social welfare contributions. The companies of today – established or start-
ups – provide a host of benefits to its employees including, but not limited to, Employees’ Stock
Option Plans, jubilee bonuses, long-term disability benefits etc. In fact, companies like Google
even provide unusual benefits such as ‘death benefits’, which involve paying the deceased’s
spouse or domestic partner 50% of their salary for 10 years after death of the employee.
This Standard shall be applied by an employer in accounting for all employee benefits
except those to which Ind AS 102, Share-based Payment, is applicable (e.g. Employees
Stock Option Plans).
This Standard does not deal with reporting by employee benefit plans.
Employee benefits to which this Standard applies include those provided
under formal plans/agreements between an entity and its individual employees/group
of employees/their representatives,
as required by law or as required by any type of industry arrangements whereby an
entity is required to contribute to any nation/state/industry or other multi-employer
plans; or
by those informal practices that give rise to a constructive obligation. Informal
practices give rise to a constructive obligation where the entity has no realistic
alternative but to pay employee benefits.
Example of a constructive obligation - Where a change in the entity’s informal
practices would cause unacceptable damage to its relationship with employees.
Employee Benefits
Post Employee Benefits
Termination Benefits
Employees include
Directors and other
Full-time Part time Permanent Casual Temporary
management
employees employees employees employees employees
personnel
1.4 DEFINITIONS
1.4.1 Definitions of employee benefits
1. Employee Benefits: All forms of consideration given by an entity in exchange for service
rendered by employees or for the termination of employment.
2. Short-term Employee Benefits: Employee benefits (other than termination benefits) that
are expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the annual
reporting period in which the employees render the related service.
Example : Wages, salaries, social security contributions (PF / ESI), paid annual leave /
sick leave.
3. Post-employment Benefits: Employee benefits (other than termination benefits and short-
term employee benefits) that are payable after the completion of employment.
Example : Pensions, lumpsum payments on retirement.
4. Other long-term employee benefits are all employee benefits other than short-term
employee benefits, post-employment benefits and termination benefits.
Example : Long-term paid absences such as long-service leave or sabbatical leave,
jubilee or other long-service benefits.
5. Termination benefits are employee benefits provided in exchange for the termination of
an employee’s employment as a result of either:
4. Multi-employer Plans: Defined contribution plans (other than state plans) or defined
benefit plans (other than state plans) that:
(a) pool the assets contributed by various entities that are not under common control; and
(b) use those assets to provide benefits to employees of more than one entity, on the
basis that contribution and benefit levels are determined without regard to the identity
of the entity that employs the employees.
1.4.3 Definitions relating to the net defined benefit liability (asset)
1. Net defined benefit liability (asset): The deficit or surplus, adjusted for any effect of
limiting a net defined benefit asset to the asset ceiling.
2. Deficit or surplus:
(a) the present value of the defined benefit obligation less
(b) the fair value of plan assets (if any).
3. Asset ceiling: The present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds
from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
4. Present value of a defined benefit obligation: Present value, without deducting any plan
assets, of expected future payments required to settle the obligation resulting from
employee service in the current and prior periods.
5. Plan assets comprise:
(a) assets held by a long-term employee benefit fund; and
(b) qualifying insurance policies.
6. Assets held by a long-term employee benefit fund: Assets (other than non-transferable
financial instruments issued by the reporting entity) that:
(a) are held by an entity (a fund) that is legally separate from the reporting entity and
exists solely to pay or fund employee benefits; and
(b) are available to be used only to pay or fund employee benefits, are not available to
the reporting entity’s own creditors (even in bankruptcy), and cannot be returned to
the reporting entity, unless either:
(i) the remaining assets of the fund are sufficient to meet all the related employee
benefit obligations of the plan or the reporting entity; or
(ii) the assets are returned to the reporting entity to reimburse it for employee benefits
already paid.
7. Qualifying Insurance Policy: Insurance policy issued by an insurer that is not a related
party (as defined in Ind AS 24, Related Party Disclosures) of the reporting entity, if the
proceeds of the policy:
5. Return on plan assets: Interest, dividends and other income derived from the plan assets,
together with realised and unrealised gains or losses on the plan assets,
Less:
(a) any costs of managing plan assets; and
(b) any tax payable by the plan itself, other than tax included in the actuarial assumptions
used to measure the present value of the defined benefit obligation.
6. Settlement: A transaction that eliminates all further legal or constructive obligations for
part or all of the benefits provided under a defined benefit plan, other than a payment of
benefits to, or on behalf of, employees that is set out in the terms of the plan and included
in the actuarial assumptions.
This obligation exists and is recognized, even if the paid (compensated) absences are non-
vesting. However, in case an employee leaves the entity before they use an accumulated
non-vesting entitlement, it will affect the measurement of this obligation.
An entity shall measure the expected cost of accumulating paid (compensated) absences
as the additional amount that the entity expects to pay as a result of the unused
entitlement that has accumulated at the end of the reporting period.
Illustration 1: Vested Accumulating Benefits
Mr. Rajan is working for Infotech Ltd. Consider the following particulars:
Annual salary of Mr. Rajan = ₹ 30,00,000
Total working days in 20X0-20X1 = 300 days
Leaves allowed in 20X0-20X1 as per company policy = 10 days
Leaves utilized by Mr. Rajan in 20X0-20X1 = 8 days
The unutilized leaves are settled by way of payment and accordingly, carry forward of such
leaves to the subsequent period is not allowed.
Compute the total employee benefit expense for Infotech Ltd. in respect of 20X0-20X1.
Solution
Mr Rajan is entitled to a salary of 30,00,000 for 300 total working days.
Thus, per day salary works out to 30,00,000 ÷ 300 days = 10,000 per day
In the year 20X0-20X1, Mr. Rajan availed 8 out of 10 leaves allowed by the company.
Accordingly, leaves unutilized = 10 – 8 = 2 days
In line with the company policy, Infotech Ltd. will pay Mr. Rajan for the unutilized leave.
Thus, total expense for 20X0-20X1 = 30,00,000 + (2 days unutilized leaves x 10,000
per day) = 30,20,000.
*****
Illustration 2: Non-Vested Accumulating Benefits
Mr. Niranjan is working for Infotech Ltd. Consider the following particulars:
Year 20X0-20X1 Year 20X1-20X2
Annual salary 30,00,000 30,00,000
No. of working days during the year 300 days 300 days
Leave allowed 10 days 10 days
Leave taken 7 days 13 days
Leave unutilized carried forward to next year 3 days NIL
Based on the evaluation above, Mr. Niranjan has worked for 6 days more (293 days –
287 days) in 20X0-20X1 as compared to 20X1-20X2.
Since he has worked more in 20X0-20X1 as compared to 20X1-20X2, the accrual concept
requires that the expenditure to be recognized in 20X0-20X1 should be more as compared
to 20X1-20X2.
Thus, if Infotech Ltd. recognizes the same expenditure of 30,00,000 for each year, it
would be in violation of the accrual concept.
The expenditure to be recognized will be as under:
Particulars Year 20X0-20X1 Year 20X1-20X2
Annual salary (A) 30,00,000 30,00,000
No. of working days (B) 300 days 300 days
Salary cost per day (A ÷ B) 10,000 per day 10,000 per day
No. of days worked (from above) 293 days 287 days
Expense to be recognised:
In 20X0-20X1: 30,00,000 + [ 10,000 per day
x 3 days (leaves unutilized expected to be
utilized subsequently)] 30,30,000
In 20X1-20X2: 30,00,000 – [ 10,000 per day
– 3 days (excess leave utilized in 20X1-20X2)] 29,70,000
The entity will recognise liability in the books equal to 150 (30 x 5) days of paid casual
leaves and 10 (10 x 1) days of paid sick leaves.
*****
Illustration 5
An entity has 100 employees, who are each entitled to ten working days of paid sick leave
for each year. Unused sick leave may be carried forward for one financial year. Sick leave
is taken first out of the current year’s entitlement and then out of any balance brought
forward from the previous year (a LIFO basis).
At 31 st March 20X1, the average unused entitlement is two days per employee. Based on
past experience, the management expects that only 20% of the employees will use 1 day
from their carried forward leave. Salary per day is 2,500.
Compute the expenses in respect of the short-term compensated absences, if they are
assumed to be (a) vested short-term compensated absences, and (b) non-vested short-
term compensated absences.
Solution
Vested short-term compensated absences:
Employee Benefit Expense = 100 Employees x 2 Days x 2,500 = 5,00,000
Illustration 6
Acer Ltd. has 350 employees (same as a year ago). The average staff attrition rates
observed during past 10 years represents 6% per annum. Acer Ltd. provides the following
benefits to all its employees:
Paid vacation - 10 days per year regardless of date of hiring. Compensation for paid
vacation is 100% of employee's salary and unused vacation can be carried forward for
1 year. As of 31 st March, 20X1, unused vacation carried forward was 3 days per employee,
average salary was 15,000 per day and accrued expense for unused vacation in
20X0-20X1 was ` 65,00,000. During 20X1-20X2, employees took 9 days of vacation in
average. Salary increases in 20X1-20X2 was 10%.
Analyse how would Acer Ltd. recognize liabilities and expenses for these benefits as of
31 st March, 20X2. Pass the journal entry to show the accounting treatment.
B. Newcomers (6%):
Particulars Man-days
Entitlement to vacation for 20X1-20X2 10 days per employee
Average vacation availed in 20X1-20X2 (9) days per employee
Unused vacation as on 31 st March, 20X2 1 day per employee
(being unused leaves of 20X1-20X2 on FIFO basis)
Total Unused vacation as on 31 st March, 20X2 - (B) 21 man-days
(350 employees x 6% x 1 day per employee)
Total unused vacation as on 31 st March, 20X2 (A + B) 1,337 man-days
Step 2: Calculation of average salary per day:
Particulars Amount ( )
Average salary per day as on 31 st March, 20X1 15,000
Salary increase in 20X1-20X2 10%
Average salary per day as on 31 st March, 20X2 16,500
Step 3: Calculation of provision for unused paid vacation:
Particulars Amount ( )
Calculation of provision for unused paid vacation 20X1-20X2: 2,20,60,500
(1,337 man-days x 16,500)
Provision for unused paid vacation 20X0-20X1 65,00,000
Vesting: When
employees are
entitled to a cash
payment for
When the unused entitlement
employees render on leaving the
service that entity
Accumulating increases their
entitlement to
future paid Non-vesting:
Short Term Paid absences which When employees
Absences are carried forward are not entitled to a
cash payment for
unused entitlement
When the on leaving
Non -Accumulating
absences occur
Solution
The company shall recognize a liability and an expense of an amount of 9 crores for the
financial year 20X1-20X2 (i.e. 4.5% of 200 crores).
*****
Illustration 8
Acer Ltd. has 350 employees (same as a year ago). The average staff attrition rates as
observed during past 10 years represents 6% per annum. Acer provides the following
benefits to all its employees:
Annual bonus - during past 10 years.
Acer paid bonus to all employees who were in service during the entire financial year.
Bonus was paid in June following the financial year-end. Amount of bonus for 20X1-20X2
paid in June 20X2 represented 1,25,000 per employee. Acer Ltd. used to increase
amount of bonus based on official inflation rate which is 8.5% for 20X2-20X3, although
there was no legal obligation to increase the bonus by such inflation rate.
Determine how would Acer Ltd. recognize liabilities and expenses for these employee
benefits as on 31 st March, 20X3. P ass the journal entry to show the accounting treatment.
Solution
Particulars Amount ( )
Bonus paid for 20X1-20X2 1,25,000 per employee
Bonus for 20X2-20X3 - increased by inflation of 8.5%: 1,35,625 per employee
[1,25,000 x (100% + 8.5%)]
No. of employees in staff during the whole year [350 x (100- 329 employees
6%)]
Provision for Bonus for 20X2-20X3 4,46,20,625
Accounting Treatment:
Provision for Bonus for 20X2-20X3
Employee Benefits Expenses A/c Dr. 4,46,20,625
To Provision for Bonus 20X2-20X3 4,46,20,625
Note:
It is given that the company is under no legal obligation to increase the bonus by the official
inflation rate. However, the company has been increasing the bonus by the inflation rate
over the past years. This has given rise to a constructive obligation for Acer Ltd. Informal
practices, such as these, give rise to a constructive obligation where the entity has no
realistic alternative but to pay employee benefits. Accordingly, provision is made for the
amount considering the inflation rate.
*****
If profit-sharing and bonus payments are not settled wholly before the twelve months
after the end of the reporting period in which the employees render the related service,
those payments are considered as other long –term employee benefits.
1.5.4 Disclosure
This Standard does not require specific disclosures about short-term employee benefits.
However, other Ind AS may require disclosures.
Examples:
Ind AS 24 requires disclosures about employee benefits for key management
personnel.
Ind AS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, requires disclosure of employee
benefits expense.
Disclosure may be
No specific required like as per
Short term paid Profit sharing and disclosures Ind AS 1 &
absences bonus prescribed Ind AS 24
Types
Conditions
No liability or exp.
recognized until the
Obligation is time of absence
Recognised as expenses and not
recognized as an as distribution of profits
additional amount
Defined Defined
contribution benefit
plans plans
Defined
Contribution
Plans Defined Benefit
Plans
2. Risk bearer Actuarial risk and investment risk Actuarial risk and investment
fall on the employee and not on risk fall on the entity and not
the entity. on the employee.
3. Change in the Generally, no change in the If actuarial or investment
obligation contribution of an entity is made experience are worse than
except in certain cases. expected, the entity’s
obligation may be increased
for providing to the employees.
4. Determination The amount of the post- Pre-determined / Agreed post-
of the amount employment benefits received by employment benefits are
of post- the employee is determined by received by the employee.
employment the amount of contributions paid
benefit by an entity and employee as
well.
Illustration 9
A company pays each employee a lump-sum one-time benefit upon retirement. This benefit is
computed based on the employee's years in service in the company and the final salary prior to
retirement. To cover its liabilities from this remuneration, the company contributes 3% of annual
gross salaries to the fund.
Comment whether this obligation represent a defined contribution plan or a defined benefit plan
and why?
Solution
Defined benefit plan
Reason: Although the Company pays contributions to the fund to cover its liabilities, amount of
remuneration is determined in advance and Company will have to carry the risk in case the
fund's assets are not sufficient to cover remuneration in full.
*****
Illustration 10
In accordance with applicable legislation, company contributes 12% and employees 12% of
annual gross salaries to the provident and pension fund. Upon retirement, the employees will
get the accumulated balance that is calculated based on employee's years of service and his
average salary for past 15 years before retirement. The pension will be paid out of the state
fund assets and the company has no further obligation except to make contributions.
Analyse whether this obligation represent a defined contribution plan or a defined benefit plan.
(b) disclose:
(i) the fact that the plan is a defined benefit plan;
(ii) the reason why sufficient information is not available to enable the entity to
account for the plan as a defined benefit plan; and
(iii) the expected contributions to the plan for the next annual reporting period; and
(c) to the extent that a surplus or deficit in the plan may affect the amount of future
contributions, disclose:
(i) available information about that surplus or deficit;
(ii) the basis used to determine that surplus or deficit; and
(iii) the implications, if any, for the entity.
The reasons that an entity is not able to term its plan as a defined benefit plan and has to
account for a plan as multi-employer defined contribution plan, this may occur if:
the entity does not have access to sufficient information about the plan to satisfy the
requirements of this Standard; or
the plan exposes the entities to actuarial risks associated with the current and former
employees of other entities, with the result that there is no consistent and reliable
basis for allocating the obligation, plan assets and cost to individual entities
participating in the plan.
There may be a contractual agreement between the multi-employer plan and its
participants that determines how the surplus in the plan will be distributed to the
participants (or the deficit funded). A participant in a multi-employer plan with such an
agreement that accounts for the plan as a defined contribution plan shall recognise
the asset or liability that arises from the contractual agreement and
the resulting income or expense in profit or loss.
In determining when to recognise, and how to measure, a liability relating to the wind-up of
a multi-employer defined benefit plan, or the entity’s withdrawal from a multi-employer
defined benefit plan, an entity shall apply Ind AS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets.
Example 1
Paras Pvt. Ltd. does not have sufficient information about a defined benefit plan and thus
accounts for the plan as if it were defined contribution plan.
In the plan, there is a contractual agreement between Paras Pvt. Ltd. and its participants to
share the deficit amongst all. The funding valuation shows a deficit of 500 million in the plan.
The plan has agreed under contract a schedule of contributions with the participating employers
in the plan that will eliminate the deficit over the next 10 years. The entity’s total contributions
In case the amount of contribution already paid under a defined contribution plan exceeds
the contribution due for service before the end of the reporting period, an entity shall
recognise that excess as an asset (prepaid expense) to the extent that the prepayment will
lead to, a reduction in future payments or a cash refund; and
(b) as an expense if not included in the cost of an asset as per other Ind AS (for example,
according to Ind AS 2 and Ind AS 16).
Where contributions to a defined contribution plan do not fall due wholly before twelve months
after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees render the related service,
the contributions shall be discounted using the discount rate as specified in this Standard.
1.7.2 Disclosure
An entity shall disclose the amount recognised as an expense for defined contribution
plans.
An entity shall disclose information about contributions to defined contribution plans for key
management personnel where required as per Ind AS 24.
Illustration 11
Acer Ltd. provides lump-sum remuneration upon retirement to its employees. Remuneration is
paid out of the fund to which Acer Ltd. contributes 12% of annual gross salaries. Contributions
are made twice a year i.e. in November of the related financial year and in June after the
financial year-end. Total annual gross salaries for 20X0-X1 amounted to 50 crores.
Contribution made by Acer Ltd. in November 20X0 was ` 2.8 crores. Remuneration depends on
the number of employee's service and amount of cash in the fund at retirement date (Acer Ltd.
has no further obligations except for contributions).
How should this transaction appear in the financial statements of Acer Ltd. as of
31 st March 20X1?
Solution
1. Calculation of accrual for contributions in 20X0-20X1:
Annual gross salaries in 20X0-20X1: 50.00 crores
Amount of total contributions for 20X0-20X1 (12%): 6.00 crores
Contributions already made in November 20X0: 2.80 crores
Accrual ( 6 crores - 2.8 crores) 3.20 crores
2. Accounting Treatment:
Employee Benefits Expenses Account Dr. 6.00 crores
To Bank Account 2.80 crores
To Contribution Payable 3.20 crores
mortality rate, staff attrition rate, salary at the time of retirement / resignation, discount rate etc.,
all of which have to be considered by Dinkar Ltd. The complexity involved in this exercise does
not provide Dinkar Ltd. with an excuse to avoid accrual accounting.
Dinkar Ltd. has stated that it would be willing to make a disclosure to the effect of the departure
from Ind AS 8 requirements. In terms of Para 19 of Ind AS 1, departure is permitted in
extremely rare circumstances wherein the management concludes that compliance with an Ind
AS requirement would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of the Financial
Statements set out in the Framework.
In the given case, compliance with Ind AS would not be a conflict, as the compliance with
Ind AS 19 would ensure that the accrual assumption laid down in the Framework is complied
with. Further, a disclosure cannot be a remedy for non-compliance. Therefore, the company
have to state that the Ind AS have not been complied with by the company in the preparation
and presentation of its Financial Statements.
Hence, the company will have to suitably modify the financial statements considering the
materiality and pervasiveness of the non-compliance.
*****
1.8.1 Recognition and measurement
Defined benefit plans can be:
Unfunded; or
Wholly or partly funded
by contributions by an entity, and sometimes its employees, into an entity, or fund,
that is legally separate from the reporting entity and from which the employee benefits
are paid.
The payment of funded benefits when they fall due depends on
the financial position and the investment performance of the fund; and
an entity’s ability (and willingness) to make good any shortfall in the fund’s assets.
Therefore, the entity, in substance, underwrites the actuarial and investment risks
associated with the plan.
Hence the expense recognised for a defined benefit plan is not necessarily the amount of
the contribution due for the period.
Step II: Determining the amount of the net defined benefit liability (asset)
Determining the amount of the net defined benefit liability (asset) as the amount of the
deficit or surplus determined in step I above, adjusted for any effect of limiting a net
defined benefit asset to the asset ceiling.
Step III: Determining amounts to be recognised in profit or loss:
(i) current service cost.
(ii) any past service cost and gain or loss on settlement.
(iii) net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset).
Step IV: Determining the remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset), to be
recognised in other comprehensive income, comprising:
(i) actuarial gains and losses;
(ii) return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in net interest on the net
defined benefit liability (asset); and
(iii) any change in the effect of the asset ceiling, excluding amounts included in net
interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset).
In case an entity has more than one defined benefit plan, the entity applies these procedures for
each material plan separately.
An entity shall determine the net defined benefit liability (asset) with sufficient regularity that the
amounts recognised in the financial statements do not differ materially from the amounts that
would be determined at the end of the reporting period.
1.8.2 Accounting for the constructive obligation
Accounting for any constructive obligation will also be done by an entity that arises from the
entity’s informal practices.
Constructive obligation arises due to informal practices where the entity has no realistic
alternative but to pay employee benefits.
Example - Where a change in the entity’s informal practices would cause unacceptable
damage to its relationship with employees
The formal terms of a defined benefit plan may permit an entity to terminate its obligation
under the plan. Nevertheless, it is usually difficult for an entity to terminate its obligation
under a plan (without payment) if employees are to be retained.
Hence accounting for post-employment benefits assumes that an entity which is currently
promising such benefits will continue to do so over the remaining working lives of
employees, in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
Comparison with recognition of Deferred Tax Asset under Ind AS 12 Income Taxes:
As per para 24 of Ind AS 12 Income Taxes, a deferred tax asset shall be recognised for all
deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be
available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised.
The principle of taxable profit being available for future utilization of deductible temporary
difference is essential under Ind AS 12 in order to recognise Deferred Tax Assets.
However, in Ind AS 19, no such principle of establishing probability is required as the Plan
Assets represent actual investments which are held by the entity (albeit through a separate
trust specially formed).
Illustration 13
How will the following information be presented in the Balance Sheet of Udyog Ltd.?
Particulars in lakhs
PV of Defined Benefit Obligations 3,500
Fair Value of Plan Assets 3,332
Solution
Particulars in lakhs
PV of Defined Benefit Obligations 3,500
Less: Fair Value of Plan Assets (3,332)
Deficit, to be treated as Net Defined Benefit Liability under Non-current
Liabilities as Provisions in the Balance Sheet 168
*****
Illustration 14
How will the following information be presented in the Balance Sheet of Udyog Ltd.?
Particulars in lakhs
PV of defined benefit obligations 2,750
Fair value of plan assets 2,975
Asset ceiling 175
Solution
Particulars in lakhs
PV of defined benefit obligations 2,750
Less: Fair value of plan assets (2,975)
Surplus, to be treated as net defined benefit asset 225
Asset ceiling as per Ind AS 19 175
Least of above is surplus to be treated as net defined benefit asset 175
under non-current assets in the Balance Sheet
*****
Illustration 15
AJ Ltd is engaged in the business of trading of chemicals having a net worth of
150 crores. The company’s profitability is good and hence the company has introduced
various benefits for its employees to keep them motivated and to ensure that they stay with
the organization. The company is an associate of RJ Ltd which is listed on Bombay Stock
Exchange in India.
The company initially did not have any HR function but over the last 2 years, the
management set up that function and now HR department takes care of all the benefits
related to the employees and how they can be structured in a manner beneficial to both the
employees and the objectives of the company.
One of the employee benefits involves a lump sum payment to employee on termination of
service and that is equal to 1 per cent of final salary for each year of service. Consider the
salary in year 1 is 10,000 and is assumed to increase at 7 per cent (compound) each
year.
Taking a discount rate at 10 per cent per year, you are required to compute
(a) benefits attributed (year on year) and
(b) the obligation in respect of this benefit (year on year)
For an employee who is expected to leave at the end of year 5
Following assumptions may be taken to solve this:
There are no changes in actuarial assumptions.
No additional adjustments are needed to reflect the probability that the employee may
leave the entity at an earlier or later date.
Solution
a. Computation of benefit attributed to prior years and current year:
Amount in
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Benefit attributed to:
- Prior years - 131 262 393 524
- Current year (Refer W.N.1) 131 131 131 131 131
Total (i.e. current and prior years) 131 262 393 524 655
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Salary 10,000 10,700 11,449 12,250 13,108
(10,000 x (10,700 x (11,449 x (12,250 x
107%) 107%) 107%) 107%)
(b) the date when further service by the employee will lead to no material amount of
further benefits under the plan, other than from further salary increases.
The Projected Unit Credit Method requires an entity to attribute benefit to the current period
(in order to determine current service cost) and the current and prior periods (in order to
determine the present value of defined benefit obligations).
An entity will attribute benefit to periods in which the obligation to provide post-employment
benefits arises as employees render services in return for post-employment benefits which
an entity expects to pay in future reporting periods.
These kind of actuarial techniques allow an entity to measure that obligation with sufficient
reliability to justify recognition of a liability.
Example 2
A defined benefit plan provides a lump-sum benefit of 200 payable on retirement for each
year of service. A benefit of 200 is attributed to each year. The current service cost is
the present value of 200. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is the
present value of 200, multiplied by the number of years of service up to the end of the
reporting period.
If the benefit is payable immediately when the employee leaves the entity, the current
service cost and the present value of the defined benefit obligation reflect the date at which
the employee is expected to leave. Thus, because of the effect of discounting, they are
less than the amounts that would be determined if the employee left at the end of the
reporting period.
Employee service gives rise to an obligation under a defined benefit plan even if the
benefits are conditional on future employment (in other words they are not vested).
Employee service given the vesting date gives rise to a constructive obligation because, at
the end of each successive reporting period, the amount of future service that an employee
will have to render before becoming entitled to the benefit is reduced. An entity considers
the probability that some employees may not satisfy any vesting requirements in measuring
its defined benefit obligation.
Although, certain post-employment benefits, for example, post- employment medical
benefits, become payable only if a specified event occurs when an employee is no longer
employed, an obligation is created when the employee renders service that will provide
entitlement to the benefit if the specified event occurs.
The probability that the specified event will occur affects the measurement of the obligation
but does not determine whether the obligation exists.
Example 3
A plan pays a lump-sum retirement benefit of 4,000 to all employees who are still employed at
the age of 55 after twenty years of service, or who are still employed at the age of 65,
regardless of their length of service.
of the first 10 years is 1% (10% ÷ 10 years) of the Present Value of the expected medical
costs. For these employees, no benefit is attributed to service between the end of the
tenth year and the estimated date of leaving.
3. For employees expected to leave within ten years, no benefit is attributed.
4. The Current Service Cost in each year reflects the probability that the employee may not
complete the necessary period of service to earn part or all of the benefits.
*****
Illustration 22
AKJ Ltd is a listed company engaged in the business of manufacturing of electronic equipment.
The company has various branch offices spread out across India and has 1,000 employees.
As per the statutory requirements, gratuity shall be payable to an employee on the termination of
his employment after he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years -
(a) on his superannuation, or
(b) on his retirement or resignation, or
(c) on his death or disablement due to accident or disease.
The completion of continuous service of five years shall not be necessary where the termination
of the employment of any employee is due to death or disablement.
The amount payable is determined by a formula linked to number of years of service and last
drawn salary. The amount payable to an employee shall not exceed 10,00,000.
Compute the amount of employee benefit, if any, attributed to each year of service.
Solution
The amount of gratuity would be attributed to each year of service and calculated as follows:
Number of employees not likely to fulfil the eligibility criteria will be ignored.
Other employees will be grouped according to period of service they are expected to render
taking into account:
mortality rate,
disablement and
resignation after 5 years.
Gratuity payable will be calculated in accordance with the formula prescribed in the governing
statute based on the period of service and the salary at the time of termination of employment,
assuming promotion, salary increases etc.
For those employees for whom the amount payable as per the formula does not exceed
10,00,000, over the expected period of service, the amount payable will be divided by the
(iv) taxes payable by the plan on contributions relating to service before the reporting
date or on benefits resulting from that service.
An entity determines discount rate and other financial assumptions in nominal (stated)
terms unless estimates in real (inflation-adjusted) terms are more reliable. For example, in
a hyperinflationary economy, or where the benefit is index-linked and there is a deep
market in index-linked bonds of the same currency and term.
Financial assumptions are based on market expectations, at the end of the reporting
period, for the period over which the obligations are to be settled.
1.9.3.1 Actuarial assumptions: mortality and discount rate
1. Mortality Assumptions
Entity is required to determine its mortality assumptions by reference to its best estimate of
the mortality of plan members both during and after employment.
In order to estimate the ultimate cost of the benefit an entity shall takes into consideration
the expected changes in mortality, for example by modifying standard mortality tables with
estimates of mortality improvements.
2. Discount Rate Assumptions
The rate which is used to discount post-employment benefit obligations (both funded
and unfunded) is determined by reference to market yields on government bonds
at the end of the reporting period.
Subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and branches domiciled outside India
shall discount post-employment benefit obligations arising on account of post-
employment benefit plans using the rate determined by reference to market yields
at the end of the reporting period on high quality corporate bonds.
In case, such subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and branches are domiciled in
countries where there is no deep market in such bonds, the market yields (at the
end of the reporting period) on government bonds of that country shall be used.
The currency and term of the government bonds shall be consistent with the currency
and estimated term of the post-employment benefit obligations as the pay-outs will
happen in same currency only.
The discount rate reflects the estimated timing of benefit payments/time value of
money and not the actuarial or investment risk. This also does not reflect entity-
specific credit risk borne by the entity’s creditors.
Thus, practically speaking, it is achieved by an entity by applying a single weighted
average discount rate that reflects the estimated timing and amount of benefit
payments and the currency in which the benefits are to be paid.
(c) benefits vary in response to a performance target or other criteria. For example, the
terms of the plan may state that it will pay reduced benefits or require additional
contributions from employees if the plan assets are insufficient. The measurement of
the obligation reflects the best estimate of the effect of the performance target or other
criteria.
Further, future benefit changes that are not set out in formal terms of the plan (or a
constructive obligation) at the end of the reporting period; will result in impacting past
service cost and current service cost for the period after change to the extent of such
change in benefits for the service.
Some post-employment benefits are linked to variables such as the level of state retirement
benefits or state medical care. The measurement of such benefits reflects expected
changes in such variables, based on past history and other reliable evidence.
Assumptions about medical costs shall take into account estimated future changes in the
cost of medical services, resulting from both inflation and specific changes in medical
costs.
Post-employment medical benefits measurement requires assumptions about the level and
frequency of future claims and the cost of meeting those claims. Future medical costs are
estimated on the basis of historical data about the entity’s own experience and in case
some more data is required to analyse the data, this data is gathered as historical data
from other entities, insurance companies, medical providers or other sources. Estimates of
future medical costs would consider the effect of technological advances, changes in health
care utilisation or delivery patterns and changes in the health status of plan participants.
The level and frequency of claims is particularly sensitive to the age, health status and sex
of employees (and their dependants) and may be sensitive to other factors such as
geographical location. Hence, this historical data is adjusted to the extent that the
demographic mix of the population which differs from that of the population used as a basis
for the historical data. Also it requires an adjustment where there is reliable evidence that
historical trends will not continue.
Some post-employment health care plans also require employees to contribute to the
medical costs covered by the plan and thus estimates of future medical costs also take in
account of any such contributions which are based on the terms of the plan at the end of
the reporting period (or based on any constructive obligation that goes beyond those
terms). Changes in those employee contributions result in past service cost or, where
applicable, curtailments. The cost of meeting claims may be reduced by benefits from state
or other medical providers.
Set out in the formal terms of the plan (or arise from a constructive obligation Discretionary
that goes beyond those terms)
(1)
Reduce service cost by Reduce service cost in the Affect re- Reduce service cost upon
being attributed to periods period in which the related measurements of the payment to the plan
of service [paragraph service is rendered net defined benefit (paragraph 92)
93(a)] [paragraph 93(b)] liability (asset)
[paragraph 93]
(1) This dotted arrow means that an entity is permitted to choose either accounting.
A settlement occurs together with a plan amendment and curtailment if a plan is terminated
with the result that the obligation is settled and the plan ceases to exist. However, the
termination of a plan is not a settlement if the plan is replaced by a new plan that offers
benefits that are, in substance, the same.
1.9.3.3.1 Past service cost
Change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from a plan
amendment or curtailment is known as past service cost.
An entity shall recognise past service cost as an expense at the earlier of the following
dates:
(a) when the plan amendment or curtailment occurs; and
(b) when the entity recognises related restructuring costs (refer Ind AS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets) or termination benefits.
Plan amendment happens when an entity introduces, or withdraws, a defined benefit plan
or changes the benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan.
Curtailment arises when an entity significantly reduces the number of employees covered
by a plan. A curtailment may arise from an isolated event, such as the closing of a plant,
discontinuance of an operation or termination or suspension of a plan.
Past service cost may be either positive (when benefits are introduced or changed so that
the present value of the defined benefit obligation increases) or negative (when benefits
are withdrawn or changed so that the present value of the defined benefit obligation
decreases).
In case, an entity reduces benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan and, at
the same time, increases other benefits payable under the plan for the same employees,
the entity treats the change as a single net change.
Past service cost excludes the following:
(a) the effect of differences between actual and previously assumed salary increases on
the obligation to pay benefits for service in prior years (there is no past service cost
because actuarial assumptions allow for projected salaries);
(b) underestimates and overestimates of discretionary pension increases when an entity
has a constructive obligation to grant such increases (there is no past service cost
because actuarial assumptions allow for such increases);
(c) estimates of benefit improvements that result from actuarial gains/ return on plan
assets that have been recognised in the financial statements if the entity is obliged, by
either the formal terms of a plan (or a constructive obligation that goes beyond those
terms) or legislation, to use any surplus in the plan for the benefit of plan participants,
even if the benefit increase has not yet been formally awarded (there is no past
service cost because the resulting increase in the obligation is an actuarial loss); and
1.10.2 Reimbursements
An entity will recognise its right to reimbursement as a separate asset when, and only
when, it is virtually certain that another party will reimburse some or all of the expenditure
required to settle a defined benefit obligation. The assets are measured at fair value by the
entity and in all other respects, an entity shall treat that asset in the same way as plan
assets. In the statement of profit and loss, the expense relating to a defined benefit plan
may be presented net of the amount recognised for a reimbursement.
Sometimes, an entity is able to look to another party, such as an insurer, to pay part or all
of the expenditure required to settle a defined benefit obligation, there an entity accounts
for qualifying insurance policies in the same way as for all other plan assets. When an
insurance policy is not a qualifying insurance policy, that insurance policy is not a plan
asset.
Further, when an insurance policy is not a qualifying insurance policy, that insurance policy
is not a plan asset. In such a scenario, an entity recognises its right to reimbursement
under the insurance policy as a separate asset, rather than as a deduction in determining
the defined benefit liability (asset) and in all other respects, the entity treats that asset in
the same way as plan assets.
If the right to reimbursement arises under an insurance policy that exactly matches the
amount and timing of some or all of the benefits payable under a defined benefit plan, the
fair value of the reimbursement right is deemed to be the present value of the related
obligation.
The difference between the interest income on plan assets and the return on plan assets is
included in the remeasurement of the net defined benefit liability (asset).
Interest on the effect of the asset ceiling is part of the total change in the effect of the asset
ceiling and is determined by multiplying the effect of the asset ceiling by the discount rate.
An entity shall determine the effect of the asset ceiling at the start of the annual reporting
period. However, if an entity remeasures the net defined benefit liability (asset), the entity
shall determine interest on the effect of the asset ceiling for the remainder of the annual
reporting period after the plan amendment, curtailment or settlement considering any
change in the effect of the asset ceiling. The difference between interest on the effect of
the asset ceiling and the total change in the effect of the asset ceiling is included in the
remeasurement of the net defined benefit liability (asset).
1.11.2 Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset)
Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset) comprise:
(a) actuarial gains and losses;
(b) the return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in net interest on the net
defined benefit liability (asset); and
(c) any change in the effect of the asset ceiling, excluding amounts included in net
interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset).
Actuarial gains and losses occur from increases or decreases in the present value of the
defined benefit obligation because of changes in actuarial assumptions and experience
adjustments. Following are the few causes of actuarial gains and losses:
(a) unexpectedly high or low rates of employee turnover, early retirement or mortality or
of increases in salaries, benefits (if the formal or constructive terms of a plan provide
for inflationary benefit increases) or medical costs;
(b) the effect of changes to assumptions concerning benefit payment options;
(c) the effect of changes in estimates of future employee turnover, early retirement, or
mortality or of increases in salaries, benefits (if the formal or constructive terms of a
plan provide for inflationary benefit increases) or medical costs; and
(d) the effect of changes in the discount rate.
Actuarial gains and losses does not include changes in the present value of the defined
benefit obligation because of the introduction, amendment, curtailment or settlement of the
defined benefit plan, or changes to the benefits payable under the defined benefit plan.
Rather such changes shall result in past service cost or gains or losses on settlement.
In measuring the return on plan assets, an entity deducts the costs of managing the plan
assets and any tax payable by the plan itself, other than tax included in the actuarial
31 st March, 20X2 and amounts to be recognized in the statement of profit and loss and
other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2.
(b) Provide the journal entries in respect of amount(s) to be recognized.
Solution
(a) Extract of the Balance Sheet of RKA Private Ltd as at 31 st March, 20X2
in lacs
Closing net defined liability (1,580 – 1,275) lacs 305
Extract of the Statement of Profit or Loss of RKA Private Ltd for the year ended
31 st March, 20X2
Particulars in lacs
Service cost 55
Net interest (Refer W.N.1) 21
Profit or loss 76
Other comprehensive income:
Remeasurements (Refer W.N.2) 80
Total 156
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Net interest taken to the Statement of Profit or Loss
= Discount rate x Opening net defined benefit liability
= 8% x (1,400 – 1,140) lacs
= 8% x 260 lacs = 21 lacs (Rounded off to nearest lacs)
OR
Statement to calculate Actuarial gain or loss on defined benefit liability:
Particulars in lacs
Opening balance of liability 1,400
Current service cost 55
Interest on opening liability (1,400 x 8%) 112
Actuarial loss (Bal. fig) 13
Closing balance of liability 1,580
OR
Particulars in lacs
Opening balance of asset 1,140
Cash contribution 111
Actual return (Bal. fig) 24
Closing balance of asset 1,275
Net interest on opening balance of plan asset = 91 lacs (i.e. 1,140 lacs x 8%)
(Rounded off to nearest lacs)
Hence there is a decrease in plan assets due to remeasurement for which
computation is as follows:
Actual Return – Net interest on opening plan asset
= ₹ 24 lacs – ₹ 91 lacs = ₹ 67 lacs.
Net remeasurement would be computed as follows:
Actuarial loss on liability + Loss on return = 13 lacs + 67 lacs = 80 lacs.
3. Computation of increase/ decrease in net defined benefit liability:
Particulars in lacs
Opening net liability ( 1,400 lacs – 1,140 lacs) 260
Closing net liability 1,580 lacs – 1,275 lacs) 305
Increase in liability 45
*****
1.12 PRESENTATION
1.12.1 Offset
An asset relating to one plan will be offset against a liability relating to another plan when,
and only when, the entity:
(a) has a legally enforceable right to use a surplus in one plan to settle obligations under
the other plan; and
(b) there is an intention either to settle the obligations on a net basis, or to realise the
surplus in one plan and settle its obligation under the other plan simultaneously.
The offsetting criteria are similar to those established for financial instruments in Ind AS 32,
Financial Instruments: Presentation.
1.13 DISCLOSURE
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the
nature of its defined benefit plans and the financial effects of changes in those plans during the
period.
1.13.1 General
An entity shall disclose information that:
(a) explains the characteristics of its defined benefit plans and risks associated with them;
(b) identifies and explains the amounts in its financial statements arising from its defined
benefit plans; and
(c) describes how its defined benefit plans may affect the amount, timing and uncertainty
of the entity’s future cash flows.
If the disclosures provided in accordance with Ind AS 19 and other Ind AS are insufficient
to meet the required objectives, additional information necessary to meet those objectives
should be disclosed. For example, an entity might present an analysis of the present value
of the defined benefit obligation that distinguishes the nature, characteristics and risks of
the obligation. Such a disclosure could distinguish:
(a) between amounts owing to active members, deferred members, and pensioners;
(b) between vested benefits and accrued but not vested benefits; and
(c) between conditional benefits, amounts attributable to future salary increases and other
benefits.
1.13.2 Characteristics of defined benefit plans and risks associated
with them
An entity shall disclose:
(a) information about the characteristics of its defined benefit plans, including:
(i) the nature of the benefits provided by the plan (e.g. final salary defined benefit plan or
contribution-based plan with guarantee);
(ii) a description of the regulatory framework in which the plan operates (e.g. the level of
any minimum funding requirements, and any effect of the regulatory framework on the
plan, such as the asset ceiling); and
(iii) a description of any other entity’s responsibilities for the governance of the plan (e.g.
responsibilities of trustees or of board members of the plan).
(b) a description of the risks to which the plan exposes the entity, focused on any unusual,
entity specific or plan-specific risks, and of any significant concentrations of risk. For
example, if plan assets are invested primarily in one class of investments (e.g. property),
the plan may expose the entity to a concentration of property market risk; and
(c) a description of any plan amendments, curtailments and settlements.
1.13.3 Explanation of amounts in the financial statements
An entity shall provide a reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing balance for
each of the following, if applicable:
(a) the net defined benefit liability (asset), showing separate reconciliations for:
(i) plan assets;
(ii) the present value of the defined benefit obligation; and
(iii) the effect of the asset ceiling; and
(b) any reimbursement rights. An entity shall also describe the relationship between any
reimbursement right and the related obligation.
Each reconciliation listed above shall show each of the following, if applicable:
(a) current service cost;
(b) interest income or expense;
(c) remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset), showing separately:
(i) the return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in interest in interest
income or expense;
(ii) actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions;
(iii) actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in financial assumptions; and
(iv) changes in the effect of limiting a net defined benefit asset to the asset ceiling,
excluding amounts included in interest income or expense. An entity shall also
An entity shall disclose the significant actuarial assumptions used to determine the present
value of the defined benefit obligation. Such disclosure shall be in absolute terms (e.g. as
an absolute percentage, and not just as a margin between different percentages and other
variables). When an entity provides disclosures in total for a grouping of plans, it shall
provide such disclosures in the form of weighted averages or relatively narrow ranges.
1.13.4 Amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows
An entity shall disclose:
(a) a sensitivity analysis for each significant actuarial assumption as of the end of the
reporting period, showing how the defined benefit obligation would have been affected
by changes in the relevant actuarial assumption that were reasonably possible at that
date;
(b) the methods and assumptions used in preparing these sensitivity analyses and the
limitations of those methods; and
(c) changes from the previous period in the methods and assumptions used in preparing
the sensitivity analyses, and the reasons for such changes.
To provide an indication of the effect of the defined benefit plan on the entity’s future cash
flows, an entity shall disclose:
(a) a description of any funding arrangements and funding policy that affect future
contributions;
(b) the expected contributions to the plan for the next annual reporting period;
(c) information about the maturity profile of the defined benefit obligation. This will
include the weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation and may
include other information about the distribution of the timing of benefit payments, such
as a maturity analysis of the benefit payments.
1.13.5 Multi-employer plans
If an entity participates in a multi-employer defined benefit plan, it shall disclose:
(a) a description of the funding arrangements, including the method used to determine the
entity’s rate of contributions and any minimum funding requirements;
(b) a description of the extent to which the entity can be liable to the plan for other entities’
obligations under the terms and conditions of the multi-employer plan; and
(c) a description of any agreed allocation of a deficit or surplus on:
(i) wind-up of the plan; or
(ii) the entity’s withdrawal from the plan.
(b) that group entity’s financial statements are available to users of the financial
statements on the same terms as the financial statements of the entity and at the
same time as, or earlier than, the financial statements of the entity.
1.13.7 Disclosure requirements in other Ind AS
Where required by Ind AS 24 Related Party Disclosures, an entity discloses information
about:
(a) related party transactions with post-employment benefit plans; and
(b) post-employment benefits for key management personnel.
Where required by Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent liabilities and Contingent Assets, an
entity discloses information about contingent liabilities arising from post-employment
benefit obligations.
The form of the employee benefit does not determine whether it is provided in exchange for
service or in exchange for termination of the employee’s employment. Termination benefits
are typically lump sum payments, but sometimes also include
(a) enhancement of post-employment benefits, either indirectly through an employee
benefit plan or directly.
(b) salary until the end of a specified notice period if the employee renders no further
service that provides economic benefits to the entity.
Indicators that an employee benefit is provided in exchange for services include the
following:
(a) the benefit is conditional on future service being provided (including benefits that
increase if further service is provided).
(b) the benefit is provided in accordance with the terms of an employee benefit plan.
Employee benefits provided in accordance with the terms of an employee benefit plan are
termination benefits if they both result from an entity’s decision to terminate an employee’s
employment and are not conditional on future service being provided.
Some employee benefits are provided regardless of the reason for the employee’s
departure. The payment of such benefits is certain (subject to any vesting or minimum
service requirements) but the timing of their payment is uncertain. Although such benefits
are described in some jurisdictions as termination indemnities or termination gratuities,
they are post-employment benefits rather than termination benefits, and an entity accounts
for them as post-employment benefits.
1.15.1 Recognition
An entity is required to recognise a liability and expense for termination benefits at the
earlier of the following dates:
(a) when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits; and
(b) when the entity recognises costs for a restructuring which is within the scope of
Ind AS 37 and involves the payment of termination benefits.
For termination benefits payable as a result of an employee’s decision to accept an
offer of benefits in exchange for the termination of employment, the time when an
entity can no longer withdraw the offer of termination benefits is the earlier of:
(a) when the employee accepts the offer; and
(b) when a restriction (e.g. a legal, regulatory or contractual requirement or other
restriction) on the entity’s ability to withdraw the offer takes effect.
There are 120 employees at the factory. At the time of announcing the plan, the entity
expects 20 of them to leave before closure. Therefore, the total expected cash outflows
under the plan are 3,200,000 (i.e. (20 × 10,000) + (100 × 30,000)). As required by
paragraph 160, the entity accounts for benefits provided in exchange for termination of
employment as termination benefits and accounts for benefits provided in exchange for
services as short-term employee benefits.
Termination benefits
The benefit provided in exchange for termination of employment is 10,000. This is the
amount that an entity would have to pay for terminating the employment regardless of
whether the employees stay and render service until closure of the factory or they leave
before closure. Even though the employees can leave before closure, the termination of all
employees’ employment is a result of the entity’s decision to close the factory and terminate
their employment (i.e. all employees will leave employment when the factory closes).
Therefore, the entity recognises a liability of 12,00,000 (i.e. 120 × 10,000) for the
termination benefits provided in accordance with the employee benefit plan at the earlier of
when the plan of termination is announced and when the entity recognises the restructuring
costs associated with the closure of the factory.
Benefits provided in exchange for service
The incremental benefits that employees will receive if they provide services for the full ten-
month period are in exchange for services provided over that period. The entity accounts for
them as short-term employee benefits because the entity expects to settle them before
twelve months after the end of the annual reporting period. In this example, discounting is
not required, so an expense of 2,00,000 (i.e. 20,00,000 ÷ 10) is recognised in each
month during the service period of ten months, with a corresponding increase in the carrying
amount of the liability.
1.15.3 Disclosure
This Standard does not require specific disclosures about termination benefits, other Ind AS may
require disclosures.
For example:
a. where required by Ind AS 24 an entity discloses information about termination benefits for
key management personnel.
b. Ind AS 1 requires disclosure of employee benefits expense.
1.16.4 Principles
1.16.4.1 Availability of a refund or reduction in future contributions
An entity shall determine the availability of a refund or a reduction in future contributions in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the plan and any statutory requirements in the
jurisdiction of the plan.
An economic benefit is available in the form of a refund or a reduction in future
contributions if the entity can realise it at some point during the life of the plan or when the
plan liabilities are settled.
The economic benefit available does not depend on how the entity intends to use the
surplus. An entity shall determine the maximum economic benefit that is available from
refunds, reductions in future contributions or a combination of both. An entity shall not
recognise economic benefits from a combination of refunds and reductions in future
contributions based on assumptions that are mutually exclusive.
In accordance with Ind AS 1, the entity shall disclose information about the key sources of
estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that have a significant risk of
causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the net asset or liability recognised
in the balance sheet. This might include disclosure of any restrictions on the current
realisability of the surplus or disclosure of the basis used to determine the amount of the
economic benefit available.
1.16.4.2 The economic benefit available as a refund
1. The right to a refund
A refund is available to an entity only if the entity has an unconditional right to a
refund:
(a) during the life of the plan, without assuming that the plan liabilities must be
settled in order to obtain the refund (e.g., in some jurisdictions, the entity may
have a right to a refund during the life of the plan, irrespective of whether the
plan liabilities are settled); or
(b) assuming the gradual settlement of the plan liabilities over time until all members
have left the plan; or
(c) assuming the full settlement of the plan liabilities in a single event (i.e., as a plan
wind-up).
An unconditional right to a refund can exist whatever the funding level of a plan at the
end of the reporting period.
If the entity’s right to a refund of a surplus depends on the occurrence or non-
occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within its control, the
entity does not have an unconditional right and shall not recognise an asset.
If there is a minimum funding requirement for contributions relating to the future service,
the economic benefit available as a reduction in future contributions is the sum of:
(a) any amount that reduces future minimum funding requirement contributions for future
service because the entity made a prepayment (i.e., paid the amount before being
required to do so); and
(b) the estimated future service cost in each period less the estimated minimum funding
requirement contributions that would be required for future service in those periods if
there were no prepayment as described in (a).
An entity shall estimate the future minimum funding requirement contributions for future
service taking into account the effect of any existing surplus determined using the minimum
funding basis but excluding the prepayment. An entity shall use assumptions consistent
with the minimum funding basis and, for any factors not specified by that basis,
assumptions consistent with those used to determine the defined benefit obligation and
with the situation that exists at the end of the reporting period. The estimate shall include
any changes expected as a result of the entity paying the minimum contributions when they
are due. However, the estimate shall not include the effect of expected changes in the
terms and conditions of the minimum funding basis that are not substantively enacted or
contractually agreed at the end of the reporting period.
When an entity determines the amount, if the future minimum funding requirement
contributions for future service exceed the future service cost in any given period, that
excess reduces the amount of the economic benefit available as a reduction in future
contributions.
1.16.4.6 When a minimum funding requirement may give rise to a liability
If an entity has an obligation under a minimum funding requirement to pay contributions to
cover an existing shortfall on the minimum funding basis in respect of services already
received, the entity shall determine whether the contributions payable will be available as a
refund or reduction in future contributions after they are paid into the plan.
To the extent that the contributions payable will not be available after they are paid into the
plan, the entity shall recognise a liability when the obligation arises. The liability shall
reduce the defined benefit asset or increase the defined benefit liability so that no gain or
loss is expected.
ACCOUNTING POLICY
The Company’s employee benefits mainly include wages, salaries, bonuses, defined
contribution plans, defined benefits plans, compensated absences, deferred
compensation, and share-based payments. The employee benefits are recognized in
the year in which the associated services are rendered by the Company employees.
Short-term employee benefits are recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss at
undiscounted amounts during the period in which the related services are rendered.
i. Defined Contribution plans
T he contributions to defined contribution plans are recognized in profit or loss as and
when the services are rendered by employees. The Company has no further
obligations under these plans beyond its periodic contributions.
7. SA Pvt Ltd is engaged in the business of retail having 100 retail outlets across Northern
and Southern India. The company’s head office is located at Chennai.
SA Pvt Ltd is a subsidiary of SAG Ltd. SAG Ltd is listed on the National Stock Exchange in
India.
Following information is available for SA Pvt Ltd:
Plan Assets
At 1 st April, 20X1, the fair value of plan assets was 10,000.
Contribution to the plan assets done on 31 st March, 20X2 – 3,000
Amount paid on 31 st March, 20X2 – 300
At 31 st March, 20X2, the fair value of plan assets was 14,700
Actual return on plan assets – 2,000
Defined Benefit Obligation
At 1 st April, 20X1, present value of the defined benefit obligation was 12,000.
At 31 st March, 20X2, present value of the defined benefit obligation was 15,500.
Actuarial losses on the obligation for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2 were 100.
Current Service Cost – 2,500
Benefit paid – 300
Discount rate used to calculate defined benefit liability - 10%.
Suggest if there is any amount based on the above-mentioned information that would be
taken to other comprehensive income (with workings). Also compute net interest on the
net defined benefit liability (asset).
8. A Ltd. prepares its financial statements to 31 st March each year. It operates a defined
benefit retirement benefits plan on behalf of current and former employees. A Ltd. receives
advice from actuaries regarding contribution levels and overall liabilities of the plan to pay
benefits. On 1 st April, 20X1, the actuaries advised that the present value of the defined
benefit obligation was 6,00,00,000. On the same date, the fair value of the assets of the
defined benefit plan was 5,20,00,000. On 1 st April, 20X1, the annual market yield on
government bonds was 5%. During the year ended 31 st March, 20X2, A Ltd. made
contributions of 70,00,000 into the plan and the plan paid out benefits of 42,00,000 to
retired members. Both these payments were made on 31 st March, 20X2.
The actuaries advised that the current service cost for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2
was 62,00,000. On 28 th February, 20X2, the rules of the plan were amended with
retrospective effect. These amendments meant that the present value of the defined
benefit obligation was increased by 15,00,000 from that date.
The present value of the defined benefit obligation is the present value of monthly pension
payments of 0.3% of final salary, multiplied by the number of years of service up to the end
of the reporting period. The current service cost and the present value of the defined
benefit obligation are discounted because pension payments begin at the age of 65.
3. No benefit is attributed to service before the age of 25 because service before that date
does not lead to benefits (conditional or unconditional). A benefit of 140 is attributed to
each subsequent year.
4. As per Ind AS 19, the benefit will be attributed till the period the employee service will lead
to no material amount of benefits. And service in later years will lead to a materially higher
level of benefit than in earlier years. Therefore, for employees expected to leave after
twenty or more years, the entity would attribute benefit on a straight-line basis. Service
beyond twenty years will lead to no material amount of further benefits. Therefore, the
benefit attributed to each of the first twenty years is 2.5% (i.e. 50% divided by 20) of the
present value of the expected medical costs.
For employees expected to leave between ten and twenty years, the benefit attributed to
each of the first ten years is 2% (20 % divided by 10) of the present value of the expected
medical costs. For these employees, no benefit is attributed to service between the end of
the tenth year and the estimated date of leaving.
For employees expected to leave within ten years, no benefit is attributed.
5. (i) Cisca Pvt. Ltd. will recognise a liability in its books to the extent of 5 days of PL for
200 employees and 10 days of PL for remaining 800 employees and 2 days of SL for
200 employees and 5 days of SL for remaining 800 employees in its books as an
unused entitlement that has accumulated in 20X0-20X1 as short-term compensated
absences.
(ii) Cisca Pvt. Ltd. will recognise 70 crores (2,000 x 3.5%) as a liability and expense in
its books of account.
(iii) When an employee has rendered service to an entity during a period, the entity shall
recognise the contribution payable to a defined contribution plan in exchange for that
service.
Under Ind AS 19, the amount of 80 crores will be recognised as a liability (accrued
expense), after deducting any contribution already paid (100-20) and an expense in the
statement of profit and loss. However, if the contribution already paid would have
exceeded the contribution due for service before the end of the reporting period, an entity
shall recognise that excess as an asset (prepaid expense).
Since the contributions are payable within 12 months from the end of the year in which the
employees render the related service, they will not be discounted. However, where
contributions to a defined contribution plan do not fall due wholly within twelve months after
Note:
Net interest expense would be computed on net defined benefit liability using discount rate
of 10% given in the question-
= Net defined benefit liability x Discount rate
= 2,000 x 10%
= 200.
Working Note:
Computation of amount of remeasurement
Particulars
Actual return on plan asset for the year ended 31 st March 20X2 (C) 2,000
(Given in the question)
Less: Interest income on 10,000 held for 12 months at 10% (D) (1,000)
Remeasurement (E = C - D) 1,000
in ’000
Liability at the start of the year (60,000 – 52,000) 8,000
Current service cost 6,200
Past service cost 1,500
Net finance cost 400
Gain on settlement (500)
Contributions to plan (7,000)
Remeasurement loss (balancing figure) 3,400
Liability at the end of the year (68,000 – 56,000) 12,000