Experiment No 8
Experiment No 8
Experiment No 8
08
2 Objective
To investigate the head loss due to friction in the flow of water through a pipe and determine the
associated friction factor.
3 Introduction:
The total energy loss in a pipe system is the sum of the major and minor losses. Major losses are
associated with frictional energy loss that is caused by the viscous effects of the fluid and
roughness of the pipe wall. Major losses create a pressure drop along the pipe since the pressure
must work to overcome the frictional resistance. The Darcy-Welsbach equation is used for
determining the energy loss in pipe flow. In this equation, the friction factor, a dimensionless
quantity, is used to describe the friction loss in a pipe. In laminar flows, f is only a function of the
Reynolds number and is independent of the surface roughness of the pipe. In fully turbulent
flows, f depends on both the Reynolds number and relative roughness of the pipe wall.
4 Apparatus
F1- 10 Hydraulics Bench
F1- 18 Pipe Friction Apparatus
A stopwatch
6 Theory
The pressure difference (Pout-Pin) between two points in the pipe is due to the frictional resistance,
and the head loss h1 is directly proportional to the pressure difference.
The friction can be calculated from the Darcy-Welsbach equation:
2 ∆ hgd
f= 2
lv
where:
∆ h: head loss due to flow resistance
L: pipe length
D: pipe diameter
v: average velocity
g: gravitational acceleration
For laminar flow, the friction factor f is only a function of the Reynolds number (Re) and is
independent of the surface roughness of the pipe, i.e.:
64
f= ℜ
Where Reynolds number is given as,
ρdv
Re =
μ
For turbulent flow,
−0.25
f =0.316 ℜ
For transitional flow mean value theorm is used,
0 .3 f l +0 .7 f t
f trans=
2
f
No.of Change Flow f Reynolds theoretical(laminar f theoretical
obs in heads rate Velocity(m/s) experimental number ) (turbulent)
0.000005
1 0.161 4 0.7639 0.032479 2287.12 0.027982791 0.04569
0.000004
2 0.129 9 0.70028 0.030966 2096.64 0.030525031 0.046698
0.000004 2033.11803
0.023997
3 0.094 8 0.679061424 6 0.031478743 0.047059405
0.000004 1736.62165
4 0.078 1 0.580031633 0.027292386 6 0.036853162 0.048950911
8 Graph:
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
f 0.02
0.01
0
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400
Re
Turbulent Laminar
Figure 3:Graph
9 Possible errors:
There can be an error in the apparatus.
There can be errors in the reading that we take.
There can be a mechanical error
10 Conclusions:
After performing the experiment, we conclude that sensitivity of instrumentation plays
significant role in obtaining correct results.
It was also observed that there is no roughness effect in friction factor for low relative roughness
nickel tubes. But for any rational conclusion in transition region behavior for low relative
roughness tubes more work is required.
It can be concluded from current work that constricted parameters are promising for
improvement of laminar region friction factor. But it requires to be investigated with more data
sets with varied shape and size to develop it.