What Is The Difference Between Arduino Nano and Arduino Micro
What Is The Difference Between Arduino Nano and Arduino Micro
Introduction
Arduino is an open-source electronics platform that uses easy-to-program microcontroller boards and
software. The Arduino Nano and Arduino Micro are two popular small-form-factor boards in the Arduino
family. They provide compact, breadboard-friendly options for Arduino projects.
But what exactly are the differences between the Nano and Micro? This guide examines the key distinctions
in their specifications, design, hardware, and performance to help you select the right board for your needs.
The Arduino Nano is one of the smallest classic Arduino boards, but still includes the essential components
needed for many projects. Here are some key features:
Microcontroller: ATmega328P
Operating Voltage: 5V
Digital I/O Pins: 22
Analog Input Pins: 8
Flash Memory: 32 KB
Clock Speed: 16 MHz
Physical Size: 18 x 45 mm
Mounting Holes: No
The Nano’s small size makes it well suited for breadboard use and space-constrained projects. Its pin layout
mirrors a standard Arduino Uno for easy migration between the boards. Overall, the Nano offers a versatile,
economic option for many entry-level and intermediate Arduino applications.
The Arduino Micro is even smaller than the Nano but contains more powerful processor and networking
capabilities. Key features include:
Microcontroller: ATmega32U4
Operating Voltage: 5V
Digital I/O Pins: 20
Analog Input Pins: 12
Flash Memory: 32 KB
Clock Speed: 16 MHz
Physical Size: 18 x 33 mm
Mounting Holes: Yes
The Micro runs on the more advanced 32U4 processor, adding built-in USB communication support. Its
compact stamped form factor consumes minimal space. These advantages make the Micro a good choice for
projects involving USB connectivity or advanced processing in a tiny package.
Hardware Comparison
While the Nano and Micro share similarities in being small Arduino boards, they differ significantly in
their hardware design and component integration.
Processor/Microcontroller
The 32U4 gives the Micro native USB communication capability lacking on the 328P Nano.
Input/Output Pins
The Micro has 12 analog inputs versus 8 on the Nano, useful for more complex analog sensor applications.
Nano SRAM: 2 KB
Nano EEPROM: 1 KB
Nano Clock Speed: 16 MHz
Micro Flash Memory: 32 KB
Micro SRAM: 2.5 KB
Micro EEPROM: 1 KB
Micro Clock Speed: 16 MHz
The memory configurations are nearly identical, with the Micro having slightly more SRAM. Both operate
at 16 MHz.
Power
Nano Input Voltage: 5-12V recommended, 7-12V required for some functions
Nano Power Connector: Mini-B USB
Micro Input Voltage: 5-12V recommended, 7-12V required for some functions
Micro Power Connector: Micro-B USB
The Nano and Micro both operate on 5V logic but can accept higher input voltages. The Micro uses the
smaller Micro-B USB connector.
The Micro has a smaller footprint than the Nano. The stamped design with integrated USB plug provides a
more compact and rugged physical package.
The Micro design incorporates some built-in user interface features and takes advantage of the 32U4’s
peripherals.
Software Comparison
The Nano and Micro also use different processor families that impact compatibility with Arduino software
libraries and cores.
Processor Family
Both are Atmel AVR chips but they require different cores to provide USB support on the Micro versus
UART on the Nano.
Arduino Cores
The Leonardo core adds USB communication libraries. Most shields and libraries are compatible with both
cores.
Pin Mapping
Code written for Nano will need pin number changes to run on Micro. The pin functions match between
boards but not pin locations.
Memory Management
The Micro can more efficiently utilize its SRAM memory space than the Nano with the 328P core.
Performance Comparison
The Nano and Micro overall have generally comparable performance, but the Micro’s 32U4 architecture and
USB support provide some advantages for specific use cases.
Processing Speed
The two boards operate at the same 16 MHz frequency and thus equivalent raw processing rates.
Input/Output Speed
The 32U4 MCU implements some peripheral functions like ADC and timers in a more optimized fashion.
Interface Speed
The Micro’s integrated USB connectivity provides vastly faster throughput than the UART interface on the
Nano.
Responsiveness
USB HID allows lower latency control of the Micro from a host computer compared to Nano’s conversion
between USB and serial.
Program Storage
Both provide the same size 32 KB flash memory for storing Arduino sketches.
Cost Comparison
The Nano and Micro have similar manufacturing costs in the same low price range:
For either board, 3rd party clones can be purchased often for $10 or less.
In summary, the cost is essentially equivalent between both models when sourcing original Arduino or clone
boards. Cost does not need to be a determining factor.
Usage Comparison
The Nano and Micro lend themselves to somewhat different use cases based on their size, design, and
hardware differences:
Shared Applications:
For projects with these basic embedded control needs, either Nano or Micro could suffice. The smaller form
factor Micro may work better in tightly constrained spaces.
Summary Comparison
Conclusion
In summary, the Arduino Nano and Micro share similarities in their compact format and basic
microcontroller capabilities. But key differences exist in their I/O configuration, physical design, and
especially USB support that impact their use in various applications:
The Nano provides a compact, no-frills option for basic Arduino projects not requiring USB. Its
rectangular PCB shape and standard pin layout offer versatility.
The Micro is best for advanced projects needing USB native connectivity to PC or other devices.
Its tiny, stamped footprint can fit into the smallest spaces.
For projects that simply need a small Arduino board without USB or specificity on form factor, the lower
cost Nano is likely the better choice. But for space-constrained applications requiring direct USB integration,
the Micro’s advantages stand out. Understanding these tradeoffs allows selecting the right board for each
project’s needs.
Here are some common questions about the Arduino Nano and Micro:
Yes, both Nano and Micro are compatible with standard Arduino Uno shields since they have the same
operating voltage and I/O pin capabilities. However, the smaller physical size may block some shield
attachments in compact layouts.
The code can usually be adapted quite easily by changing pin numbers to match the different layouts. But
sketches relying on UART serial functions will require changes to use the Micro’s USB capabilities instead.
The Nano requires a separate USB-to-UART adapter, while the Micro provides built-in USB connectivity.
Nano thus needs extra wiring and components to interface with USB.
Yes, both boards can run on batteries or other standalone power supplies from 5-12V. Avoid exceeding 12V
maximum input voltage to prevent damage. The Micro’s size can be advantageous for portable,
battery-operated devices.
For complete beginners, the Nano is likely easier to start with since its functionality matches the familiar
Uno. After gaining experience, the Micro’s extra features become more useful. The Micro may seem more
complex at first.
Conclusion
The Arduino Nano and Micro each have specialized strengths for different applications. Understanding their
key hardware and software differences allows selecting the right board to best meet the needs of a particular
microcontroller project. For basic low-cost Arduino projects, the Nano provides a compact solution. Where
advanced processing and USB connectivity are required, the Micro is likely the superior choice.
Related Posts:
1. Which is the best to use between Arduino Leonardo and Arduino UNO
https://www.raypcb.com/arduino-nano-vs-micro/