Ni-Cr-Mo Alloy Cladding: Effect of Iron Dilution On Corrosion Resistance of
Ni-Cr-Mo Alloy Cladding: Effect of Iron Dilution On Corrosion Resistance of
Ni-Cr-Mo Alloy Cladding: Effect of Iron Dilution On Corrosion Resistance of
INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL
Weld cladding with nickel alloys is widely used to enhance Materials
the corrosion performance of steel components. In partic- The base plates for the claddings were C-Mn steels.
ular, extensive use has been made of Ni-Cr-Mo welding Manual metal arc (MMA) electrodes of diameter 4 mm,
consumables for sea water1 and flue gas desulphurisation according to American Welding Society (AWS) specification
(FGD)2 environments. It has long been recognised that the A5.11-90 for ENiCrMo-3, and 1·2mm wire for gas shielded
corrosion resistance of high alloy weld metals can be welding, to AWS specification A5.14-89 for ERNiCrMo-3,
affected by elemental segregation during solidification3 and, were obtained. For comparative purposes, N06625 parent
in the case of dissimilar welds, by dilution from the parent material was used in the form of 25 mm diameter bar.
materials.1•2 The effects of deposition procedure on the Material compositions are given in Table 1, where MIG
level of substrate dilution of Ni-Cr-Mo weld overlays1,4,5 refers to metal inert gas and TI G to tungsten inert gas.
have been studied, but little quantitative information has
been published relating dilution directly to corrosion Welding
performance. Perhaps as a consequence, very restrictive
Each deposit covered an area of approximately 200 x
compositional limits are sometimes imposed for the clad-
75 mm. Manual metal arc welding was used to make one,
ding surface6 which can be difficult and costly to achieve.
two, and three layer claddings and the hot wire TIG and
The present work was therefore undertaken to investigate
the effect of dilution by steel substrates on the corrosion synergic pulsed MIG process were employed to produce
single layer deposits. Two MIG welding conditions were
resistance of Ni-Cr-Mo claddings. Studies were based on
test media appropriate to chloride and oxidising acid used to obtain nominally high and low dilutions. Argon
environments, as experienced in marine service and FGD shielding was used for the MIG overlays and a 75He-25Ar
plant. Claddings on the C-Mn steel were prepared using mixture for the TIG specimen. Welding conditions are
coated electrodes and inert gas shielded welding tech- summarised in Table 2.
niques were used to deposit UNS N06625 type alloys. A
range of dilutions, essentially by iron, was obtained. Material examination
Coupons cut from the overlays were used to determine Transverse metallographic sections were prepared from the
critical pitting temperatures in lO%FeCl3 solution and in overlays for examination by light and scanning electron
H2S04-RCI. microscopy (SEM). Etching was carried out electrolytically
in 20%H2S04 with 0·1 g L -1 of NH4CNS.
Specimen C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni Al N Nb Ti Fe
a
2 Scanning electron micrograph of interdendritic N b rich phase in
MMA single layer deposit: nominal magnification x 4110
a a
Ti
Cr
Fe Ni
b
Ni
Content, wt-%
Specimen C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni Al N Nb Ti 0 Fe PRE
One layer
MMA 0·062 0·31 0·26 0·011 0·005 16·7 6·44 49·7 0'07 0·028 2·66 0·06 0·050 23·0 40·2
Two layer
MMA 0·046 0·33 0·09 0·007 0·004 19·8 8·32 58·8 0'08 0·016 3'14 0·07 0·074 9·11 47·5
Three layer
MMA 0·041 0·32 0·03 <0·005 0·003 20·9 8·83 62·8 0'06 0·021 3·23 0·06 0·073 3-43 50-4
Low dilution
MIG 0·030 0·06 0·09 <0·005 <0·001 20·3 8·53 62'1 0'29 0·006 3·32 0·22 0·002 4·81 48·6
High dilution
MIG 0·051 0·11 0·34 0·008 <0·001 16·4 6·94 50·3 0'24 0·008 2'70 O·U~ 0·002 22·5 39'4
Hot wire
TIG 0·056 0·13 0·42 0·010 <0·001 15·4 6·49 46·9 0·23 0·010 2·52 0·17 0·011 27·6 37·0
Cladding Region Ni Cr Fe Mo Nb
One layer MMA Dendrite core 48·8 16·3 27·7 5·5 1·1
Intermediate 47·7 16·7 26·1 6·9 2·0
Interdendritic 46·3 16·8 24·0 8·5 3·8
High dilution MIG Dendritic core 47·6 15·7 29·2 5·5 1·1
Interdendritic 44·8 15·6 25·8 8·6 4·5
Hot wire TIG Dendritic core 48·0 15·7 29·2 5·9 1·0
Interdendritic 46·9 16·6 26·4 6·3 3·1
Pitting temperature, DC
90
(a)
80
±~1 1
70
•• ...
60 •
50
~ 40
~
~ 30 •
~
<ll
~ I
20 ' - - - - -----'-- I
- -'---- - - - - -I ' - - - - ' - -I- - - - - - - 'I- - - - - - - '
~ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Ol
'S
'0.
90
(b) :l •
] 80
a
;S 70 •
60
• ...
50
40
...•
30
20 '---- - - 'I - - -- - I
'---- - I
----'-- - - ' -I - -- I - ' - - -----'
----
o 5 10 15 20 25 30
Fe content, wt %
... TlG/MI G • M MA X PM
.g 80 ... :l
';:
be noted, but any effect of inclusions in constituting pit {,j
70 •
initiation sites would be expected to hav e been reduced
•
by the incremental temperature test exposure method
employed.
Pit initiation and growth in the two media were very
60
50 .......
similar and were clearly controlled by th e alloy element
segregation during solidification with th e interdendritic
40
....
30
second phase particles having less effect. The results from
FeCl 3 and 'green death' solutions are compared in Fig. 10. 20
While there is a general correlation in the pitting resistance 30 35 40 45 50 55
of an overla y in the two media, the agreement is not exact PRE
despite the similar pit initiation sites. It is becoming
... TlG/MIG • MMA X PM
increasingly common to specify pitting testing in FeCl 3
solution during weld procedure qualification. Clearly, a in FeCl 3 solution; b in 'green death' solution
however, performance in an FeC l3 test can not be used 8 Relationship between PRE and CPT
80 90
.1 .1 t
70 ..•.. 8& •
0
80
~
e-
60
0
• ~~ 70
~ 000 x x
e 50 ~ 60
0
ell
Q. ~
'S
E
.! 40 x ~c 50
01
~~
Ql
c:: '" Weld
:g 30
xX metals
Q. 40
~ 20
8 30
10
X X 20
X 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0
25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Ferric chloride CPT,°C
PRE
..•.. TlG/MIG • MMA X PM
..•.. TIG/MIG • MMA :x PM
pitting resistance, although, in less demanding environ- performance of IN 625 weld deposits', Report BR91456
(N85-17376/3), Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield,
ments, single layer overlays with higher iron dilution may 1984.
provide adequate performance. 9. S. FLOREEN, G. E. FUCHS, and w. J. YANG: 'Superalloys 718, 625,
4. Pit initiation took place preferentially in alloy depleted 706 and various derivatives', (ed. E. A. Loria), 13-37; 1994,
regions in the solidification structure of the overlays. Hence, Warrendale, PA, Minerals, Metals and Materials Society.
pitting resistance is determined not by iron per se but by 10. M. N. MALIGAS, J. C. VICIC, D. C. AGARWAL, and M. KOHLER:
the total alloy content in terms of the PRE and the Proc. Conf. Corrosion '94, Baltimore, MD, USA,
minimum alloy level reached in dendrite centres. February-March 1994, NACE, Paper 63.
5. Pitting resistance of MMA overlays was inferior to 11. H. S. AHLUWAHLIA, L. H. FLASCHE, M. N. MALIGAS, and J. VICIC:
that of gas shielded ·overlays. Proc. Conf. Corrosion '93, New Orleans, LA, USA, March
1993, NACE, Paper 138.
6. General correlation was found between pitting resist- 12. S. BERNHARDSSON: Proc. Conf. Duplex Stainless Steels '91,
ance of given overlays in the two media, but this was not Beaune, France, October 1991, SF2M, 185-210.
exact. Thus, caution is necessary in setting pass/fail criteria, 13. G. RABENSTEINER: Weld. World, 1989, 27, (1/2), 2-13.
if FeCl3 solution testing is employed for weld procedure 14. R. A. WALKER and T. G. GOOCH: Br. Corros. J., 1991, 26,
qualification purposes. (1), 51-59.