Labour Law
Labour Law
Labour Law
The intricate nature of Standing Orders is marked by ongoing debates over their
classification, oscillating between statutory and contractual dimensions.
Contents hide
These rules address matters such as the classification of workers, working hours,
attendance, leave procedures, entry to premises, rights and responsibilities of both
employers and workers during work stoppages and the termination or suspension of
workers. The specific details are outlined in the Schedule of the Industrial Employment
(Standing Order) Act, 1946.
While some argue that the nature of Standing Orders is ambiguous and inconclusive,
others contend that it cannot be definitively categorised as statutory, contractual or an
award without strong supporting arguments.
In Tata Chemicals Ltd. And Ors. vs Kailash C. Adhvaryu, the High Court of Gujarat
differentiated between statutory and contractual obligations, asserting that the
certification of standing orders under the IESO Act creates statutory rights and
obligations.
Another perspective supporting the statutory nature argues that the Certifying Officer,
in certifying the standing orders, is engaged in a form of delegated legislation. The
consultation process with both parties affected by the decision implies a rule-making
role for the Certifying Officer, contributing to the overall statutory character of the
process.
Section 10(1) of the IESO Act, which allows changes to standing orders by agreement
between employers and workers, is presented as conflicting with the concept of
statutory orders, as statutes are typically not subject to modification based on
agreements.
Lastly, it is argued that the Act imposes restrictions on employers’ bargaining power,
limiting freedom of contract and emphasising compliance with model standing orders.
The Act does not delegate legislative powers but instead obligates individual employers
to create rules aligned with the schedule’s model standing orders. This, along with the
limited judicial power of the Certifying Officer, suggests that certified standing orders
are not delegated legislation and, therefore, not strictly statutory in nature.
Exemptions
The Act does not apply to industrial establishments where workers are covered by or
subject to the following Rules or Regulations:
While some judicial decisions lean towards their statutory nature, acknowledging the
Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act’s intent to make employment conditions
precise, others highlight contractual elements. The ambiguous nature stems from
challenges in categorising them definitively as statutory, contractual or resembling an
‘award,’ making the characterisation complex and multifaceted.