Company Petition No. (IB) - 545 (ND) 2023
Company Petition No. (IB) - 545 (ND) 2023
Company Petition No. (IB) - 545 (ND) 2023
CORAM:
SH. ASHOK KUMAR BHARDWAJ, HON’BLE MEMBER (J)
SH. L. N. GUPTA, HON’BLE MEMBER (T)
PRESENT:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber and Mr. Prateek
Kushwaha
For the Respondent : Sr. Adv. P Nagesh, Adv. Vipul Wadhwa, Adv.
Kashika Gera and Adv. Akshay Sharma
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 1 of 18
ORDER
credit facilities to the Corporate Debtor including term loan and cash credit
energy distribution Company Ltd. to secure loan from the applicant. As per
Director of the FC, all officials of the FC are authorised to file necessary
application/affidavit etc. before this Tribunal, and Hon’ble NCLAT qua the
2. The present application has been preferred by Mr. Vineeth PP, currently
New Delhi who was duly authorised by the applicant to prefer the same. The
to take responsibility for the obligation of the principal barrower (Debtor) viz.
M/S feedback energy distribution Company Ltd. obligation for re-paying the
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 2 of 18
4. The present application is preferred under Section 7 of IBC 2016
Debtor i.e., M/s Feeback Infra Private Limited. The CD defaulted in repayment
of the Credit facilities availed by it from the FC. It also defaulted in repaying
terms of the conditions contained in the letter, which were duly accepted by
Annexure A-4 to the application. The Corporate Debtor through its Director,
executed the various loan and security documents in favour of the Financial
application.
6. To secure the loan and advance availed by the CD, its Directors agreed
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 3 of 18
Agreement dated 26.08.2019 is on record as Annexure A-13 to the
application. M/s. Mission Holdings Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at 311,
3rd Floor, Vardhman Plaza, Pocket No. 7, Plot No. 6, Sector 12, Dwarka, New
passed by it, agreed to stand and stood as Guarantor in favour of the FC for
was credited in the term loan account no. 15287100001375 and was utilised
another loan facility i.e. Working Capital/Term Loan for a sum of Rs. 10
Crores and the Financial Creditor considered the demand and sanctioned the
(Rupees Ten Crores Only) vide sanction letter dated 18.02.2020 on the terms
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 4 of 18
Note, Undertaking Letter and Letter of Set-Off, all dated 19.02.2020 are on
record as Annexure A-17 to A-21 to the application. The Directors qua the CD
as also M/s. Mission Holding Pvt. Ltd., stood as Personal and Corporate
application.
9. The loan amount (ibid) disbursed by the Financial Creditor was credited
10. Further, again the Corporate Debtor through its Director requested the
FC for another loan facility i.e. Working Capital/Cash Credit Limit for a sum
of Rs. 5 Crores. The FC sanctioned the loan amount vide sanction letter dated
executed for sanction of the loan amount were duly executed and signed on
behalf of the CD. The Directors qua the CD and M/s. Mission Holdings Pvt.
Ltd. stood as Personal and Corporate Guarantors for the loan amount. The
Account No. 15285300001104 and was utilised by the CD as per its need and
requirement.
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 5 of 18
11. Even also thereafter, the Financial Creditor sanctioned further loan of
as per its needs and requirements. The Corporate Debtor also maintained the
Current Account No. 15280200003664 with the Financial Creditor which got
overdue as the Corporate Debtor could not pay the interest in the Demand
Loan Account, therefore interest had to be debited from the Current Account
of the CD. The development was well within the knowledge of the Corporate
Debtor.
Borrower) availed multiple loan facilities from the Financial Creditor. Several
multiple loans availed by the Principal borrower viz. M/s. Feedback Energy
Distribution Limited are given in para 26 of the written synopsis filed by the
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 6 of 18
14. The Financial Creditor had disbursed the funds to the Principal
borrower on the dates mentioned in 2nd table of para 56of the synopsis which
reads thus: -
15. To secure the loan facility availed from the Financial Creditor, the
Corporate Debtor created security interest of the Financial Creditor qua the
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 7 of 18
(i) 15th Floor, Tower 9B, DLF Cyber City, Phase-Ill, Gurugram
122022
(ii) 3rd floor. Gala Impacca, Next to Marrot Courtyard Hotel,
Jitendra Estate, AndheriKurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai
400059.
(iii) 4th Floor, Haveli Extension above radhe Sweets, sector 11,
Gandhinagar 382011 Gujrat
(iv) First Floor, Langford Avenue No. -14, Langford Garden Lalbagh
Road (Near Richmond Road) Banglore 560025.
(v) 5th Floor, Jss Tower Infocity Area, Plot No.-E-11/1, E-11/2,
Bhubaneswar-751023 Odisha India.
First Pari-Pasu Charge over Current & movable fixed assets (both
present & Future) of the Corporate Debtor.
the loan facilities availed by the Principal borrower from the Financial Creditor
“a. Term Loan: Paripassu first charge on the entire movable fixed
assets of the Principal borrower both present and future
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 8 of 18
d. Cash credit: Paripassu first charge on the entire movable fixed
assets of the Principal borrower both present and future.
g. Hypothecate all the present and future movable fixed assets of the
Principal borrower at any premises of the Principal
borrower/anywhere in transit on paripassu basis;
k. OD: Paripassu first charge on the current assets relating to the work
contracts awarded by Odisha Small Industries Corporation
Limited.
l. BG: 10% cash margin and extension of charges on the current assets
related to the EPC contracts awarded by Odisha Small Industries
Corporation Limited.
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 9 of 18
17. Besides the above, to secure the loan facilities availed by the Principal
18. As the Corporate Debtor failed to maintain the financial discipline, its
Creditor on 28.05.2021. The Financial Creditor has taken the plea that the
date of NPA may be considered as date of default for the purpose of present
application. Besides, since the Principal borrower also failed to maintain the
Asset (NPA) by the Financial Creditor on 19.11.2022. It is again the plea raised
by the Applicant that the said date may also be perceived as date of default
19. Regarding the loan/credit facility availed by the CD, the Financial
Creditor issued Demand Notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI ACT,
2002, on 23.09.2021, but the CD failed to repay the loan amount. A copy of
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 10 of 18
20. As a result, the Financial Creditor filed O.A. No. 386 of 2022/TA No.
400/2022 for the recovery of dues from the Principal borrower and the
Corporate Debtor.
21. The Financial Creditor recalled the entire loan facilities granted to the
Principal borrower vide recall notice dated 31.01.2023. The Principal borrower
failed to make payment in terms of the recall notice. As despite service of the
recall notice, the Principal borrower did not give any heed to the notices and
did not act upon the same, the Financial Creditor filed an application viz. O.A.
Diary No. 609 of 2023 for the recovery of dues from Principal borrower and
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 11 of 18
21. The Part-IV (2) of the application which contains the total amount of
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 12 of 18
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 13 of 18
22. In the reply filed on behalf of the Corporate Debtor, the salient plea
in repayment of loan; (ii) there is no debt due and payable within the meaning
of Section 3(12) of the Code; (iii) the Application is barred by Section 10A of
to the CD, the Application is not maintainable, as the date of default falls
during the period covered by Section 10A of IBC, 2016. According to it,
regarding the default in payment of interest for emergency credit loan facility,
the default was dated 28.02.2021 i.e. again covered by the period mentioned
in Section 10A of IBC, 2016. (iv) Corporate Guarantee for the loan taken by
FEDCO was invoked by the Applicant vide loan recall notice 31.01.2023 which
remains unpaid. Since the Applicant could club the recall notice with the loan
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 14 of 18
amount defaulted to be paid during the period covered by Section 10A of IBC,
23. As can be seen from the Reply filed by it, the CD has taken self-
contradictory stand. On the one hand, it has taken the plea that the CD has
not committed any default, as there was no debt due and payable by it and
on the other hand, it has pleaded that the default was committed during the
Section 7 could be filed by the Applicant in this regard. As can be seen from
Part IV (2) of the Application, the dates of default mentioned by the Applicant
are 28.05.2021 and 19.11.2022, when the account of the CD and Principal
19.09.2023 and the Corporate Guarantee given by the CD was invoked only
the Corporate Guarantee could not have been invoked. It is not the case of
the CD that the Corporate Guarantee was not invoked prior to 30.01.2023.
The CD has also not raised the plea that the account of Principal Borrower is
not declared as NPA. The plea regarding filing of the joint application qua
As can be seen from Section 7 of the Code, a Financial Creditor may either
itself or jointly with other Financial Creditors or any other person on behalf
of the Financial Creditor may file an Application under Section 7 of IBC, 2016.
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 15 of 18
It is also clear from the Explanation given below Third Proviso to Section 7(1),
a default includes not only the default in respect of a financial debt qua the
Applicant Financial Creditor but also regarding any other Financial Creditor
2016, what we need to see is only that a debt of Rs. 1 crore was disbursed to
the CD and it defaulted in payment of the same. Such conditions are satisfied
in the present case. It is also seen from Part-V (3) that the FC had reported
the debt and default to NeSL on 09.05.2023 and the Corporate Debtor had
authenticated the same on 11.06.2023. The Part-V (3) of the Application reads
thus: -
24. In view of the aforementioned, we are left with no option but to admit
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 16 of 18
(b) Transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the
interest therein;
under IBBI Regulations, 2016 are made by him within a period of one week
from this Order. It is further ordered that Mr. Rajneesh Kumar Aggarwal,
ca@arkadvisors.in) shall take charge of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor with
immediate effect and would take steps as mandated under the IBC specifically
under Section 15, 17, 18, 20 and 21 of IBC, 2016 read with extend provisions
27. The Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- only with the IRP to
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 17 of 18
adjustment by the Committee of Creditors as accounted for by Interim
Sd/- Sd/-
(L. N. GUPTA) (ASHOK KUMAR BHARDWAJ)
MEMBER (T) MEMBER (J)
(IB)-545/(ND)/2023
Federal Bank Limited vs. Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Page 18 of 18