Lecture 5 - Syntax
Lecture 5 - Syntax
Lecture 5 - Syntax
Syntax
E.g. English
- must agree in person and number with - can stand immediately after the infinitival marker to;
Verb the subject; - can follow words like will, can, may, might, would,
- can change the form to mark tense should
The constituent structure of syntactic units can be diagnosed with the help of special tests.
▪ Replacement/Substitution
E.g. a. [The children] are playing outside and they look happy.
b. The children stopped [at the corner] and we stopped there too.
▪ Movement/Displacement
E.g. a. They stopped [at the corner]. → [At the corner], they stopped.
b. I never read [this kind of book]. → [This kind of book] I never read.
▪ Both replacement and movement
E.g. John saw [a beautiful woman]. → John saw who? → Who did John see?
▪ Coordination
E.g. a. John ran [out the door] and [down the street].
▪ Cleft sentence
▪ Stand-alone
Prove that the underlined word group in each sentence below is a constituent by applying at least one constituency test.
In the examples below the repetition of a string of words is avoided by substituting one word or a short string of words.
The substitutes are underlined in the examples. Identify which strings have been replaced by the underlined words.
a. When he was named chief by Mayor James K. Hahn, Bratton told The Times that he wanted to establish close ties
with prominent leaders in the city’s minority communities. In doing so, he said, he would be better able to keep local
leaders informed of police action and reduce the likelihood of communities “exploding in anger.” (Los Angeles Times,
26.11.2002, p. B10, col. 5).
b. Is there anything that can prevent Hurricanes? To date, science and technology have not given us the ability to do so.
(Chicago Tribune, 3.1.2004, section 1, p. 28, col. 1)
c. Can stout shoes save you during a nuclear attack? They might do, providing you shake the radioactive dust from
them before going inside. (Guardian, G2, 1.4.2004, p. 15, col. 4)
d. I believe that if I were to continue to play for Zimbabwe I would do so only by neglecting the voice of my conscience.
(Guardian, Sports, 17.3.2003, p. 6, col. 2)
e. During the appearances, Bratton rejected the idea of flooding South Los Angeles streets with officers. Doing so
would probably raise the ire of a community with a long history of confrontation with police rather than solve
f. The national primary care research and development centres at Manchester and York universities, which carried out
both this study and 1998’s, acknowledge that not all the doctors who say they want to leave will. But previous research
has shown that many will do so. (Guardian, 3.1.2003, p. 1, col. 1)
g. “You can still hear the trace of it.” “So you can,” said Isobel.
h. The towns [Paula Radcliffe] has lived in (Nantwich, Bedford and Loughborough) are the epitome of Middle England.
And so is she. (Guardian, 17.12.2002, p. 13, col. 1)
i. Willie Whitelaw on a meeting with the West German interior minister: “He’s very keen on terrorism. So am I.”
(Guardian, G2, 11.9.2002, p. 5, col. 4)
Constituency tests can help to identify different readings of ambiguous sentences.
▪ Replacement test 1: I saw the man with a pair of binoculars, while my friend did so with a telescope.
▪ Replacement test 2: I saw the man with a pair of binoculars, but my friend didn’t see him.
Explain why the following structures are ambiguous. How would you rewrite them to avoid confusion?
f. Hổ vồ chết nhân viên ở trại nuôi thú để ngâm rượu thuốc. (Thanh Niên Online, 11/5/2018)
3. Phrasal projections
3.1. Types of phrases
Each constituent has a head – the element that the phrase is centered on.
prepositional phrase
preposition in the dark, under the trees, trên bàn, sau giờ học
(PP)
The syntactic category of the head determines the category of the entire phrase.
E.g. a very intelligent child is headed by the noun child, so it’s a noun phrase.
Heads are normally obligatory, while other material in a phrase may be optional.
e. *I met [NP a]./*I met [NP a very]./*I met [NP a very intelligent].
Only dependents of a certain category can occur with each kind of head (the head selects for its dependents).
In some languages such as French and Italian, heads require their dependents to agree with some or all of the
grammatical features of the head.
d. quite quickly
XP → XYZ
the label for the constituent “consists of” the elements that make up the constituent
E.g.
▪ Phrase structure rules can be very complex to account for all possibilities.
E.g. a very famous English linguistics professor with long hair from Edinburgh
E.g. PP → P NP
→ The nesting of phrases within phrases illustrates the hierarchical structure, a property common to all languages.
Tree diagrams are often used to graphically represent the hierarchical structure of phrases.
E.g.
dogs the dogs the big dogs the very big dogs
in the garden
in the beautiful garden
▪ Root node: the node with no line on top of it; Non-terminal nodes
a. a big bowl
e. ridiculously slow
f. the red flag on the pole in the square near the market (assume that in the square modifies pole and near the market
modifies square)
Exercise 8: The following phrases are ambiguous. Use labelled bracketing and tree diagrams to explain why.
E.g.
English Vietnamese
NP the student [of linguistics] em sinh viên [ngành ngôn ngữ học]
E.g.
English Vietnamese
E.g. a. *the student [of linguistics] and the one [of chemistry]
b. the student [with long hair] and the one [with short hair].
▪ Syntactic flexibility: Adjuncts are usually more syntactically flexible than complements.
E.g. a. He ate [the pizza] [with a fork] [in the kitchen] [with his friends]. → 01 complement, 03 adjuncts
b. The woman put [some sugar] [in her coffee]. → 02 complements, 0 adjuncts
E.g. a. sleep under the tree/in the bedroom/on the sofa/behind the door → adjuncts
Function in traditional
Position Type of complement Example(s)
grammar
Nominal a bread seller
(an NP without a a tennis ball
Prehead determiner) an income tax adviser premodifier
a legal adviser
Adjective
an ecological expert
a student of linguistics
PP a ban on smoking
an interest in linguistics
the idea that he passed the exam
Posthead CP postmodifier
the question whether he would stay
2. (a) The discussion at the match was more animated than the one in the bar.
(b) *The discussion of the match was more animated than the one of the riots.
Exercise 10: Discuss the ambiguity of the phrase a student of high moral principles.
Determiners such as a, an, and the are called specifiers; they are not complements nor adjuncts, but they are still
required by the head to complete phrases.
Function in traditional
Position Type of complement Example(s)
grammar
afraid of ghosts
PP good at English
aware of the problem
Subordinating conjunctions such as because, although, and since can be (and should be) classified as prepositions.
dO
▪ Ditransitive verbs: require two NPs functioning as the indirect object (iO) and direct object (dO);
iO dO
▪ Copular/Linking verbs: require one NP/PP/AdjP functioning as the subject complement (sC);
sC sC sC
▪ Complex-transitive verbs: require one NP functioning as the direct object and one NP/PP/AdjP functioning as the
object complement;
E.g. I consider him my best friend. I saw him in the garden. I found that exercise really hard.
dO oC dO oC dO oC
→ The traditional classificatory system misses some types of complements that certain verbs can take.
Complements of English verbs stand in posthead position.
f. carefully passed John the salt on the table because my mother was there
(There are two mistakes in this tree.) (There are two mistakes in this tree.)
c. the flower seller across the street d. bought a lamp from the store on Thursday
(There are two mistakes in this tree.) (There are two mistakes in this tree.)
Exercise 14: Draw trees for the following phrases using the X-bar schema.
g. purchased a very small container of flour with a glass lid right after the lesson
Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology].
Carnie, A. (2021). The syntax workbook: A companion to Carnie's syntax (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Haegeman, L. (2005). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. Blackwell Publishing.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2016). Analysing English sentences (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Santorini, B. & Kroch, A. (2007). The syntax of natural language: An online introduction using the Trees program. Retrieved
from https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook.