Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis 2Nd Edition John Vail Farr Full Chapter
Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis 2Nd Edition John Vail Farr Full Chapter
Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis 2Nd Edition John Vail Farr Full Chapter
. . 'ti
� <il',
�-
Engineering Economics of Life
Cycle Cost Analysis
The rise of the information age and the digital economy has dramatically changed
engineering and other technology-driven fields. With tremendous advances in com-
puting and communication systems, major organizational upheavals, all fueled by
complexity, globalization, short cycle times, and lean supply chains, the functions of
engineers have significantly changed. Engineers and similar professionals must be
technically savvy and have product management and costing skills all while work-
ing in a distributed and often unstable environment. This new-edition textbook is
updated to cover the integration of cost, risk, value, scheduling, and information
technologies going beyond basic engineering economics.
Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Second Edition, offers a systems
and life cycle or total ownership cost perspective. It presents advanced costing tech-
niques such as simulation-based costing, decision and risk analysis, complex systems
costing, software, big data, and cloud computing estimation. Examples and problems
demonstrating these techniques with real-world applications are also included.
All engineers and similar professionals will find this book useful, but it is mainly
written for systems engineers, engineering managers, program/product managers,
and industrial engineers. The text can serve as a professional reference or for use
with graduate courses on advanced engineering economic analysis and cost manage-
ment, and financial analysis for engineers.
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and pub-
lisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use.
The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in
this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been
obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may
rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or here-
after invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, access www.copyright.com
or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-
750-8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact mpkbookspermissions@tandf.co.uk
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003254782
Typeset in Times
by KnowledgeWorks Global Ltd.
v
vi Contents
Chapter 10 The Role of Risk, Value, and Cost in Making Decisions.................. 251
10.1 Introduction............................................................................ 251
10.2 Common Decision Analysis Tools......................................... 253
10.2.1 Decision Trees........................................................... 253
10.2.2 Decision-Making Based upon Value Analysis.......... 257
10.2.3 Pugh Matrix.............................................................. 261
10.2.4 Summary................................................................... 262
10.3 Risk......................................................................................... 262
10.3.1 Overview................................................................... 262
10.3.2 Risk Buffers............................................................... 265
10.4 Integrating Risk, Value, and Costs for Decision Analysis..... 265
10.5 Making Defensible and Transparent Decisions...................... 265
10.5.1 Bias............................................................................ 265
10.6 Summary................................................................................ 268
Bibliography...................................................................................... 269
References......................................................................................... 269
xi
xii List of Abbreviations
xv
xvi Preface
right set of MPTs and should replace engineering economy at both the undergradu-
ate and graduate level. Thus, we wrote the 2019 LCC textbook which was the first
edition of this text. In our software-centric workplace, Dr. Faber is able to bring
some modern relevance to the traditional engineering economic topics based upon
his software and data science background. First and foremost, tools like Excel and
@Risk have made teaching real-world cost problems possible. Secondly, most engi-
neers work in an interdisciplinary world and must understand TOC of their products.
Entry-level engineers simply need more than the mathematics of the time value of
money to succeed that is taught in traditional engineering economics classes/lectures.
Life cycle costing is at best an immature industry-driven discipline. Unfortunately,
textbooks are often long on theory and short on meaningful examples, real data, etc.
The 2nd edition of the 2019 textbook was developed with several goals. First and
foremost, we wanted to introduce new material because of the rapid advances in
data analytics, big data, and software-centric systems. Thus, we added a new chapter
on costing data and advanced computational methods with details on such subjects
as cloud versus distributed systems and the role of costing in artificial intelligence/
machine learning. We also added a chapter on integration cost, value, and schedule
to better perform trade space studies. Secondly, we wanted to correct all of the many
errors and add additional problems. One of the criticisms of the original text was that
many of the problems were too challenging. We originally tried to present as many
real-world problems as possible. Many of the new problems that were added were
designed to demonstrate the techniques in lieu of applying them to a real-world prob-
lem. Lastly, we added an appendix of how to use the economic functions in Excel.
Most of the examples in the text have been updated to demonstrate the functionality
of Excel in lieu of the traditional solution methods of equations and table lookup.
Our former colleagues at West Point along with the students and faculty at Stevens
Institute of Technology, University of Central Florida, Clarkson University, and
Stanford University contributed to much of the material presented herein. Having
made every effort to correctly reference the material, we suspect there are phrases
and other elements of the book that are not properly referenced. If you encounter a
phrase, figure, etc., that is not correctly referenced please send us the correct infor-
mation. Also, please send us any ideas, problems, mistakes, new material, etc. Note
that we are maintaining the website www.systemscosting.com. This is a great way to
contact us, provide feedback, etc.
John V. Farr
Professor Emeritus
United States Military Academy at
West Point
Isaac J. Faber
Chief Data Scientist
United States Army
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank some of the many people who contributed to the publishing
of this textbook. First and foremost, we would like to thank our former colleagues
at the United States Military Academy at West Point, particularly Jackie, James,
Kenny, Tim, Jeff, and Travis, and many of Dr. Farr’s colleagues at Stevens Institute
of Technology, specifically Dinesh, Brian, Rob, Mike, Kate, and Don, who inspired
him to write the original life cycle costing reference and this textbook adaptation.
Dr. Farr’s exposure to systems engineering at both West Point and Stevens helped
shape his motivation to move beyond traditional engineering economics and write
the original reference book. In addition, Dr. Farr’s former colleagues and students at
the University of Central Florida, especially Tim, and Clarkson University continue
to inspire us to deliver high-quality, relevant, and connected material to our students.
We also owe a debt of gratitude to the selfless servants in the US Army whom we
worked with for the majority of our professional careers. Their high standards for
professionalism sustained us when writing this book and performing all the jobs of
an academician became tedious. We would be remiss if we did not thank the many
students who encouraged us to write the book and contributed to much of the mate-
rial used in the text. Their projects formed the basis for many of the class problems,
examples, and case studies. There is no way to recognize each of them individually,
but we wish to thank them all collectively.
Most importantly, we would like to thank our wives, Michele and Kerry. Dr. Farr
owes a debt of gratitude to his two sons, Michael, David and their families, for their
patience during the many nights he worked late on both editions of this book and for
understanding as he traveled around the world to teach the courses for which it was
developed. Isaac also owes a debt to his four children, who sacrificed many hours of
time with their father to make this manuscript possible.
xix
About the Authors
Dr. John V. Farr is a professor emeritus of
Engineering Management at the United States
Military Academy (USMA) at West Point
and was the Founding Director of the Center
for Nation Reconstruction and Capacity
Development upon his retirement in 2017. He
currently teaches part time in the School of
Business at Clarkson University. Upon his
reinterment until 2022 he was a faculty admin-
istrator at the University of Central Florida and
consultant with Applied Research Associates
conducting cost, decision, and risk analysis.
From 2007 to 2010, he was a professor of Systems Engineering and Engineering
Management and Associate Dean for Academics in the School of Systems and
Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. He was the founding director of the
Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management at Stevens from
2000 to 2007. Before coming to Stevens in 2000, he was a professor of Engineering
Management at USMA where he was the first permanent civilian professor in engi-
neering and Director of their Engineering Management Program. Dr. Farr is a former
past president and fellow of American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM)
and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). He is a former edi-
tor of the Journal of Management in Engineering and the founder of the Engineering
Management Practice periodical. He has authored or edited over 200 technical pub-
lications to include five books, seven book chapters, and over 90-refereed publi-
cations mainly on cost analysis, infrastructure, engineering education, engineering
management, and systems engineering. Dr. Farr earned his undergraduate degree
from Mississippi State University and Masters and PhD in Civil Engineering from
Purdue and the University of Michigan, respectively. Dr. Farr is also a member of
Chi Epsilon, a founding member of Epsilon Mu Eta, and Phi Kappa Phi honor soci-
eties. He is a member of the International Council of Systems Engineering, ASCE,
and ASEM. He is also a registered civil engineer in Florida and Mississippi and a
certified project management professional (PMP). Dr. Farr has served on numerous
defense national and academic advisory boards to include membership on the Army
Science Board, Army Education Advisory Committee, Board on Army RDT&E,
Systems Acquisition and Logistics, and as a member of the Air Force Studies Board
and the Board on Army Research and Development of the National Academies. He
has served as a consultant and principal subject matter expert for numerous com-
panies and government agencies and worked in Afghanistan, Africa, Vietnam, and
the Marshall Islands on a wide variety of economic and capacity development and
assessment projects. He taught at the University of Technical Education, Ho Chi
Minh City, Vietnam, in 2013 as a Fulbright specialist.
xxi
xxii About the Authors
• understand and track both the technical and profitability aspects of a project,
• communicate with the financial people, such as accountants and auditors,
and to senior management,
• read and understand financial statements to assess the health of a potential
partner as well as one’s own corporation or agency,
• understand the financial and legal liabilities of their designs and contracts,
• have a life cycle perspective including long-term obligations such as lease versus
buy, warranties, equipment replacement, true costs of employees, and so on, and
• understand the execution of an engineering business and that operational
and strategic decisions can affect profitability and business operations.
Much has been written about innovation and entrepreneurship for engineers and
scientists. The National Science Foundation (NSF) and many others have written
DOI: 10.1201/9781003254782-2 3
4 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
5
6 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
proposals, and, for smaller companies, they can be the face of the organization.
Beyond listening and communicating, they must work with stakeholders to ensure
their expectations are executable within the financial constraints of the project.
Customer relations is focused on making the customer feel both valued and wel-
comed, which requires excellent listening and communication skills. Being able to
communicate the language of finances is an important element of not only managing
but also cultivating customer relations. Engineers who possess only technical knowl-
edge can often unnecessarily intimidate customers, leading to a loss in confidence
and potentially a loss in revenues.
Customer relations involves working with stakeholders not only on engineer-
ing services but also on ensuring that business operations such as billing, con-
tracts, and other service obligations are met. Again, this shows that engineers
must be involved in business operations even if their primary focus is technical
work. Often customers make decisions primarily based on cost factors, so engi-
neers who understand this motivation can be more effective in tailoring their
technical efforts.
1.1.3 Engineering Services
Engineers deliver a wide variety of products and services. They design, build, and/or
operate a wide variety of products and services through low-cost, best value, or sole
source bidding. They use existing scientific principles to create outcomes that meet
stakeholder needs. One of the core needs of most stakeholders is low-cost design that
meets stated requirements.
Numerous design processes can be found in the literature, and all consist of iden-
tifying the problem and stakeholder requirements, brainstorming ideas, generating
solutions, building a model or prototype, developing selection criteria and choosing
the best alternative, and collecting feedback from the customer.
Design-build is a method of project delivery in which a single firm (the
designer-builder) is contracted to provide a finished product. Operations lumped
with design-build for product realization lead to estimates for total life cycle costs
(LCCs) or total ownership costs (TOC) and have become popular because one con-
tractor assumes all the risk. The term whole life costing (WLC) is also used in the
construction industry. The LCC implications of providing for all types of project
delivery (i.e., any combination of design, build, and/or operation) are important
and complex, requiring engineers to be part of a team of lawyers, accountants,
bankers, and others.
FIGURE 1.3 Challenges cost estimators typically face. (Modified from Government
Accounting Office, 2009.)
FIGURE 1.4 Generic life cycle model with business process and engineering.
and disposal, within the constraints imposed by economic, legal, social, cultural and
environmental consideration.” Figure 1.4 shows one generic life cycle model and the
role of engineers throughout the life cycle.
The core function of the engineering profession is to develop solutions. Solutions
are what systems engineers produce to solve a specific problem or to help close a per-
formance gap. From a user perspective, these gaps are either known (e.g., the need to
bring fresh water to a community) or unknown (e.g., the need to listen to on-demand,
tailored music, anytime and almost anywhere via a smart device). The National
Academy of Engineering (NAE) determined the top 20 engineering achievements of
the 21st century, listed in Table 1.1, which offer solutions to make life easier, to connect
people, and to explore. As we move forward, the National Academy of Engineering
(2000) has also defined the next set of engineering challenges to be solved. In develop-
ing solutions to these challenges, the engineering organization and the engineer must
make decisions about how to use resources and which path is the best to solve the chal-
lenge. Note that all of these are as relevant now as they were in 2000.
To help connect the need or requirement to the solution, the engineer must be able
to provide credible answers to a set of questions:
TABLE 1.1
Engineering Achievements and Challenges
Top 20 Engineering Achievements (NAE, 2000) Grand Challenges
• Electrification • Make Solar Energy Affordable
• Automobile • Provide Energy from Fusion
• Airplane • Develop Carbon Sequestration Methods
• Water Supply and Distribution • Manage the Nitrogen Cycle
• Electronics • Provide Access to Clean Water
• Radio and Television • Restore and Improve Urban Infrastructure
• Agricultural Mechanization • Advance Health Informatics
• Computers • Engineer Better Medicines
• Telephone • Reverse-engineer the Brain
• Air Conditioning and Refrigeration • Prevent Nuclear Terror
• Highways • Secure Cyberspace
• Spacecraft • Enhance Virtual Reality
• Internet • Advance Personalized Learning
• Imaging • Engineer the Tools for Scientific Discovery
• Household Appliances
• Health Technologies
• Petroleum and Petrochemical Technologies
• Laser and Fiber Optics
• Nuclear Technologies
• High-Performance Materials
Answering these questions ensures that the solution will be profitable and able to
make a difference. The focus of this text is on the fourth question, “Will we make
money?”, which in many ways drives the other questions.
In today’s global business environment, engineers integrate hardware, software,
people, processes, and interfaces to produce economically viable and innovative
products and services while ensuring that all pieces of the enterprise work together.
The engineer’s real challenge is to make all the pieces work together to solve the real
problems of the enterprise using cost-effective solutions.
The notion of cost-effective solutions has been gaining increasing scrutiny in
engineering projects due to traditional industries that have seen competition erode
historical profit margins and government agencies whose budgets have been con-
strained or have come under scrutiny. A recent example of this is the successful
landing of a series of rovers on Mars. The four vehicles employed in interplanetary
space exploration have been heralded almost as much for their cost-effectiveness as
for the technical engineering involved in designing them. Indeed, on NASA’s web-
site (see NASA, 2017), the first of the four rovers is described as “a demonstration
of the technology necessary to deliver a lander and free-ranging robotic rover to the
surface in a cost-effective and efficient manner.” The implication of this statement
is that the rover would be thought of as a failure if its design was not cost-effective
and efficient. It is becoming ever more important that engineers understand the cost
implications of their designs and decisions in order to continue to fulfill their roles.
Overview of Systems Life Cycle Costing 11
Note that in all the definitions of engineering discussed above, there exists an
economic element. This element has grown in importance over time; notice that cost
is not predominant in the first definition by the Engineers’ Council for Professional
Development but is clearly elaborated in more recent definitions, such as the one
from the Quality Assurance Agency. Financial and business issues will continue to
do more than directly affect technical work done each day; more than ever, they will
also affect the careers of engineers. Also, technical employees who contribute to the
resolution of business issues are considered more valuable and have faster career pro-
gressions. Most engineers transition from technical to business jobs as their career
develops, including starting a business or leading firms in managerial roles.
As the process of globalization continues, leading to improved standards of liv-
ing and increased demand for goods and services provided by engineers, it is critical
that technical employees understand the economic considerations of design at every
stage of their careers. However, there is a disconnect with the current engineering
education curriculum and this important consideration of cost. Few of the traditional
engineering programs, such as mechanical, chemical, civil, and electrical, require
any form of finance or an introductory course in engineering economics. Most meet
the need/requirements for economic analysis with a module as part of a senior design
class. Many graduates are surprised at how important and pervasive cost and eco-
nomics are throughout an engineer’s career in any domain and how much empha-
sis is placed on these considerations in the “real world.” As shown in Figure 1.5,
engineering at all levels involves financial aspects. This book seeks to provide the
engineer with a guidebook for understanding how to incorporate the challenges of
economic considerations at each of these levels.
Each of these distinct levels (see Figure 1.5) brings its own challenges and unique
approaches to addressing them, ranging from traditional engineering economics to
advanced cost analysis. While this text is not intended to be comprehensive, it will
provide engineers with a set of tools to handle cost and economic issues related to
each respective stage in their career.
Given the increasing complexity of the current environment, engineers must pro-
vide innovative products and services. In general, engineers perform a wide variety
of services, including (modified from Pavarini, 2007)
FIGURE 1.5 Trends and challenges for engineers and the associated financial aspects.
Cost estimating and management operates across all these business areas and
environmental considerations. More than ever, engineers must consider the finan-
cial aspects of the services they provide. As the success and failure of engineering
projects is closely tied to economic factors, it is critical for engineers to understand
how their decisions affect outcomes. The following material presents methods, tech-
niques, and lessons learned and can serve as a reference book or textbook for any
technical career field.
Overview of Systems Life Cycle Costing 13
FIGURE 1.6 Some of the factors that can affect the cost of a system. (Modified from
Stevens Institute of Technology, 2008.)
14 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
FIGURE 1.7 Costs incurred and committed during our systems life cycle acquisition pro-
cess. (Modified from Andrews, 2003.)
Figure 1.7 presents a standard new product development process. This figure shows
how costs are committed and incurred as a function of phases in our LCC model.
Modern products can have life cycles that range from several years to decades long. One
of the main challenges that engineers encounter is that early in the product development
phases cost considerations are often ignored or downplayed in favor of performance
factors. However, it is during these early phases that decisions have the largest impact
on the LCC of a project. This tendency can lead to downstream cost overruns and poten-
tially project failure. It is an engineer’s responsibility to ensure that design factors pre-
sented early in the life cycle before costs are realized include financial considerations.
Table 1.2 contains a mapping of our life cycle model, milestones, and some vari-
ous cost estimation activities that occur throughout the life cycle. The list is by no
means all-encompassing and different organizations, systems, etc., all used differ-
ent terminology. The table is meant to show how that the cost estimation activity is
continually evolving and changing in order to meet various milestones. Also, as you
proceed through the life cycle the costing fidelity must increase. For example, the
“Updated Systems Development Cost” activity will evolve with more details as we
become more knowledgeable on the design of the system.
In its simplest form, LCC is composed of initial and future expenses. However,
clearly defining initial costs can be a challenge. For example, take a typical new prod-
uct development process as shown in Figure 1.7; how do we allocate investments to the
industrial base for major projects? What about spare parts? Should they be categorized
as production or operations and support? Very quickly you become mired in determin-
ing how and when to allocate expenses. Figure 1.7 also shows the standard LCC termi-
nology and model we adopted for this text and how costs are committed and incurred
as a function of phases in our LCC model. We will discuss this figure throughout the
text because of its importance in illustrating how programs and funds are committed
early in a program and what and when various techniques should be used.
16 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
TABLE 1.2
Life Cycle Model and Associated Cost Estimation Activities
(Modified from Papke and Wang, 2018)
Customer-Driven Associated Cost Estimation
Life Cycle Phases Milestone Activity
Conceptual exploration Request for information Feasibility analysis
Analysis of alternatives Cost effectiveness analysis
Competitive assessment Should cost
Draft request for proposal Initial cost baseline
Final request for proposal Updated cost baseline
Proposal Proposal cost baseline
Component advanced Contract award Proposal cost baseline
development
Systems requirements review Systems development costs
Preliminary design review Updated systems development costs
Systems integration/ Critical design review Updated systems development costs
preliminary design
Systems demonstration, Test readiness review Updated systems development costs
test, and evaluation
Systems acceptance review Updated systems development costs
Production Production readiness review Updated systems development costs
Operations, support, Operational readiness review Updated systems development costs
and disposal
The MPTs and terminology presented are important in that they can be used to
FIGURE 1.8 Domains in which engineers make trade-offs for any project.
Because of the complexity and the rapid pace of technology evolution, the costing
of complex systems has become a tremendous challenge. We understand how to cost
hardware and to a lesser extent software; however, we are still developing tools and
processes for costing the integration of complex systems. As we scale to larger and
more complex systems, systems of systems, and enterprises, our ability to determine
costs becomes less relevant and reliable.
FIGURE 1.9 Cost estimation techniques throughout the life cycle. (Modified from NASA, 2015.)
18 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
The ability to use analysis techniques such as those discussed in this chap-
ter allows an engineer to conduct defensible analysis that can not only provide
true ownership costs but can also allow for conducting meaningful trade-off
analysis.
20 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
1.5 SUMMARY
Because of technology, globalization, and complexity most engineers have become prod-
uct development professionals integrating hardware, software, people, and interfaces to
meet the stakeholder’s requirements. Few products or services are immune from cost,
performance, schedule, quality, and risk and trade-off considerations, and all must address
environmental, sociological, and political concerns. Unfortunately, engineers spend much
of their formal education focused on technical performance and most of their professional
careers focused on communication, resources, and schedules. Too often we become fix-
ated on the technical performance required to meet the customer’s requirements without
worrying about the downstream costs. In essence we ignore the problem because funding
the operations and maintenance, disposal, etc., becomes someone else’s problem.
One of the unintended consequences of globalization has been the outsourcing of
core competencies. In essence, many engineers and companies have become mar-
keters, packagers, and integrators of technology. More so than for companies with
a strong core technology as their product, engineers in the global economy must
understand costs as a business driver.
In order to be successful, we must understand the role of finances in every aspect
of our daily job. This needs to be taught at the undergraduate level. As they enter the
job market, engineers must understand at least some of the financial aspects of engi-
neering business operations and considerations that can affect product realization.
In our global service-sector economy, engineers now serve as key systems inte-
grators, enablers, and managers of people, technology, and processes to produce
economically viable and innovative products and services. Engineers, and not just
technical experts, must play a key role in all phases of new product development.
Most importantly, we must understand how to perform good cost analysis, estima-
tion, and management as well as their limitations.
Too often, performance (features and functionality) is used as the entire measure
of system effectiveness. As shown in Figure 1.10, there must be consideration given
to LCC. The broader point is that often in designing systems, we focus most of our
attention on the functions to be provided, the operational requirements, but only
when we take LCC into account do we have operational effectiveness.
REFERENCES
Andrews, Richard, 2003, An Overview of Acquisition Logistics, Defense Acquisition
University, Fort Belvoir, VA, Course Notes, 2007.
Engineers’ Council for Professional Development, 1947, “Canons of Ethics for Engineers.”
Government Accounting Office, March 2008, “2008 Defense Acquisitions, Assessments of
Selected Weapon Programs,” GAO-08-467SP.
Government Accounting Office, March 2009, “Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide Best
Practices for Developing and Managing Capital Program Costs,” GAO-09-3SP.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, February 2011, “Engineers and Business
School—A Match Made in Heaven,” accessed 1 April 2013 at http://spectrum.ieee.org/
at-work/education/engineers-and-business-schoola-match-made-in-heaven
NASA, 2015, “Cost Estimating Handbook,” accessed 1 August 2018 at https://www.nasa.gov/
pdf/263676main_2008-NASA-Cost-Handbook-FINAL_v6.pdf
NASA, 2017, “Mars Pathfinder Overview,” accessed 10 April 2018 at https://www.nasa.gov/
mission_pages/pathfinder/overview
National Academy of Engineering, 2000, “Grand Achievements and Grand Challenges,” accessed
15 June 2022 at https://www.nae.edu/7461/GreatAchievementsandGrandChallenges,
1 September 2000.
National Academy of Engineering, 2008, “Changing the Conversation: Messages for
Improving Public Understanding of Engineering,” National Academies Press,
Washington, DC.
Papke, B., and Wang, G., “Integration of Parametric Cost Estimation with System Architecture
– It’s a dirty job but someone has to do it!” 28th annual INCOSE International
Symposium, 7–12 July 2018, Washington, DC.
Pavarini, Carl, 2007, “Entrepreneurship and Business for Engineers and Scientists,” Stevens
Institute of Technology, Class TG 401.
Quality Assurance Agency, 2015, “QAA Subject Benchmark Statement for Engineering,”
accessed 1 August 2018 at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-state-
ments/sbs-engineering-15-masters.pdf?sfvrsn=fb91f681_16
Stevens Institute of Technology, 2008, “SYS 625 Fundamentals of Systems Engineering
Class Notes.”
Zhao, Y., 2013. Why 787 slips were inevitable. Rutgers University, New York.
QUESTIONS
1.1 Your subcontractor company has teamed with a large defense contractor (LDC)
and has been awarded the new Super Fighter—the largest procurement contract
in defense history. List three areas for each of the following stakeholders that
should be your primary focus when monitoring, billing, and paying your sup-
pliers/subcontractors for the Super Fighter contract:
• Program manager for the LDC
• Program manager for your subcontractor company
• LDC corporate headquarters
• Defense sponsoring agency
• Legislative body
1.2 When we buy cars, homes, major appliances, and so on, we are mainly focused
on the upfront costs (mainly purchase price) and seldom assess LCCs of a
major investment. Unfortunately, our decisions are often driven solely by per-
formance. From your own buying experience, write down your thought process
22 Engineering Economics of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
for buying a new car and weigh the major components of your decision (upfront
costs, trade-in value, gas mileage, looks, accessories, etc.). List and assign
weights (must add up to 100%) to each component of upfront and recurring
costs.
1.3 One of the key challenges for buyers is that we fixate on development costs with
little or no regard to downstream LCC costs. Briefly explain why you think
this occurs. Is this more of a problem for large government programs than for
private projects?
1.4 Firm-fixed price (FFP) contracts provide a pre-established price, which places
more risk and responsibility for costs and resulting profit or loss on the con-
tractor and provides more incentive for efficient and economical performance
(modified from Government Accounting Office, 2008). Our everyday life is
governed by FFP contracts (home construction, car maintenance, etc.), yet few
large contracts are FFP. What cultural obstacles must be overcome to institu-
tionalize FFP contracts for government?
1.5 What are the grand challenges of the next 10 years for engineers? What are the
common characteristics of these problems?
1.6 What is the difference between interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary
problems?
1.7 Let’s assume that the role of engineering-centric business is to provide cus-
tomers with a better price or better value proposition than competitors while
operating the business to attain targeted profits. What are the exceptions? How
would you restate this for government?
1.8 Engineers make trade-offs in design in risk, schedule, cost, and performance.
For product realization are these industries specific? For example, NASA might
be driven by being risk averse.
1.9 What business is Stryker in? What types of engineers do they employ, and what
are their primary job functions? Who are their customers? What is Stryker’s
current financial status or performance? Would you buy their stock? Why or
why not?
1.10 The Boeing Company Dreamliner (787) is a long-range jet airliner that was
developed by Boeing for the intended purpose of servicing commercial airline
customers. The airplane is the first to employ a lightweight composite mate-
rial for structural components and as such realizes a significant fuel savings
for its operators. However, the delivery of the first airplane was initially slated
for 2008 but due to several project delays the first in-service flight did not take
place until 2011. The airplane also suffered from numerous technical problems
in the years following its initial service. All these technical problems and delays
led to dramatic cost overruns from initial estimates (see Zhao, 2012). Research
public sources and describe the cost problems of the Dreamliner. Discuss the
systems that could have been put in place to prevent these problems.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
of which was the
sinking of the Sea Hawk.
3. BOB DEXTER AND THE STORM MOUNTAIN
MYSTERY or The Secret of the Log Cabin
Bob Dexter came upon a man mysteriously injured and
befriended him,
which led Bob into the midst of a series of strange events.
4. BOB DEXTER AND THE AEROPLANE MYSTERY or
The Secret of the Jint San
Bob and his chums witness the mysterious disappearance
of an aeroplane
and find excitement in their exploration of an unknown
cave.
5. BOB DEXTER AND THE SEAPLANE MYSTERY or
The Secret of the White Stones
Bob Dexter, while on a vacation, captures a band of
criminals, and solves
a mystery in which millions of dollars in gems and jewelry
had been stolen.
6. BOB DEXTER AND THE RED AUTO MYSTERY or The
Secret of the Flying Car
A story of a mysterious red auto is packed with many hair-
raising adventures.
Bob comes to the rescue and captures the criminals.
7. BOB DEXTER AND THE RADIO MYSTERY or The
Secret of the Counterfeiters
When Bob and his chums resolve to clear up a baffling
mystery they do
it with many narrow escapes.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.