Solution Assigment Chapter 5
Solution Assigment Chapter 5
Solution Assigment Chapter 5
Total present equivalent: PW = A∗ ( PA , MARR , N )=$ 12.5 M∗( PA , 20 % ,3)=2.106∗$ 12. 5 M =$ 26.325 M
Josh’s total bonus ¿ 0.1 %∗PW =0.1%∗$ 26.325=$ 26,325
5-11
N = 30 years
Z = C = $10000
5-16
i=10%/ year
A = $1500/year
F5 =$10000 in 5 years
CW
Engineering Economy
$ 1500
Present money by A1=$1500: P0=
0.1
A1=$10000(A/F, 10%, 5) =?
$ 1500 A 1
CW(10%)= + =?
0.1 0.1
b. Find the value for N for which A(P/A,10%,N) = CW (10%)
From Table C-13, N = 80 years
$15,000,000
$5,000,000
Cashflow sai:
5-22
What are the PW and FW of a 20-year geometric cash-flow progression increasing at 2% per year if the
first year amount is $1,020 and the interest rate is 10% per year? (5.4) – Nên dùng gradient tính PW khi
biết A và G, => FW
PW = [A – A(P/F,10%,20)(F/P,2%,20)] / (10%-2%) = [1020 – 1020(0.1486)(1.459)]/(0.08)
= (1020 – 225.220)/0.08 = $9934.75
5-23
CR(i%) = I (A/P, i%, N) − S (A/F, i%, N) = $10,000 (A/P,15%,4) − $2,000 (A/F,15%,4) = $10,000 (0.3503) − $2,000
(0.2003) = $3,102.12
5-34
b) Yes, IRR (18%) > MARR (15%). The plant project is acceptable
5-38
Method 1: Calculator:
Engineering Economy
( )
15
P 255∗(1+i % ) −1
We have: $ 3,000=$ 255∗ ,i % , N =$ 15
→i=3.2%
A i %∗( 1+i % )
Method 2: Interpolation:
( )
N
r 12
Effecttive rate=i eff %= 1+ −1=( 1.032 ) −1=0.459=45.9 % per year
N
Engineering Economy
The Two IRR are 4% and 32% and this occur due to changes of sign in the net cash flow
5-51.
Solution:
a) 0 = −$4,900 + $1,875(P/A, i′, 5)
=> i′ = 26.4%
b) θ = $4,900 / $1,875 = 3 years (to the integer year)
c) The IRR will signal an acceptable (profitable) project if the MARR is less than 26.4% and the value of
θ may indicate a poor project in terms of liquidity.
d) 1/ θ = 33.3%. This is the payback rate of return, and it over-estimates the actual IRR
5-53
PW(i'%) = 0 = −$100,000 + $20,000 (P/A,i'%,5) + $10,000 (P/G,i'%,5) + $10,000 (P/F,i'%,5)
PW(20%) = $12,891 > 0, i'% > 20%
PW(25%) = −$897 < 0, i'% < 25%
By linear interpolation, i'% = IRR = 24.7%
5-60
a. Calculate the IRR for each of the three cash-flow diagrams that follow. Use EOY zero for (i) and EOY
four for (ii) and (iii) as the reference points in time. What can you conclude about “reference year shift”
and “proportionality” issues of the IRR method?
b. Calculate the PW at MARR = 10% per year at EOY zero for (i) and (ii) and EOY four for (ii) and (iii).
How do the IRR and PW methods compare?
b) MARR = 10%
(i) PW0 (10%) = -1000 + 300(P/A,10%,5) = -1000 + (300*3.791) = $137.3
(ii) PW0 (10%) = -1000(P/F,10%,4) + 300(P/A,10%,5)(P/F,10%,4)
= -1000(0.6830) + (300*3.791*0.6830) = $93.78
(ii) PW4 (10%) = -1000 + 300(P/A, 10%, 5) = -1000 + (300*3.791) = $137.3
(iii) PW4 (10%) = -5000 + 1500(P/A, 10%, 5) = -5000 + (1500*3.791) = $686.5
So we select (iii) at EOY = 4 to maximize PW(10%)
PW (15.3%) = 0 for all three cases