Composite Project
Composite Project
•
• DATE: 11/1/2023
• Prerared by Team No.27
• Khaled al-fahel
• Supervised By:
• Eng: Asmaa Nasab
1
• Design of Composite Slab:
• Design Data:
▪ CONCRETE
▪ STRUCTURAL STEEL
▪ REINFORCEMENT STEEL
▪ PROFILED SHEETING
2
• First span:
• Dimension for slab : (350 x 800 ) Cm
•
Nominal thickness=0.9 mm
•
tp = 0.86 mm
•
g= 0.1 KN/m2 Ip = 54.8 × 104 mm4
• hp = 60 mm γNwc,dry =25KN/m3
• Ap = 1178 mm2/m γNwc,wet =25+1=26 KN/m3
3
• e = 33.34 mm Es =210000 N/mm2
• Msagging = 6.18 kN.m Mhogging = 6.18 kN.m
• hc = h - hp = 116 - 55 = 61 mm hc ≥ 50 mm ok
• h = 116 mm h ≥ 90 mm ok
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
4
• 2.2.2- Erection stage (construction):
• Actions:
• Permanent actions:
• Variable actions:
1500 1500
•
5
• Case02: (Minimum M-, Vmax., Rmax at probe)
1500
•
1500
• • Case 1 • Case 2
• • M+max • Δ • M-max • Vmax
𝑓𝑦𝑝
𝐴𝑣∗
• Vpl,rd = √3
1.25
164−112
• X= = 26 mm
2
6
▪ √=الطول المائل552 + 262 = 60.83 mm
• Av = 348 mm
o
348∗355
Vpl,Rd = = 57.181 KN/m
1.25∗√3
𝑉𝑒𝑑 5.88
• = < 1 → ok
𝑉𝑝𝑙 𝑅𝑑 57.81
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• δ = 1.16 mm
• Deflection verifications:
𝐿𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 1500
• ∂ allowable = = = 8.33 mm > 1.16 → ok
180 180
• 2)Ponding effect:
ℎ
• ∂ all. ponding = = 13.5 mm > 1.16 → ok
10
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
𝑀𝑒𝑑 17.325
• = < 1 → ok
𝑀𝑝𝑙 𝑅𝑑 36.34
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
8
• Vertical shear verification:
136 + 188
• Average width of rib: bo = = 162 mm
2
200
• Vmin = 0.035 (1+√ )3/2 √𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 0.442 N/mm2
𝑑𝑝.𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑏𝑜
• VRd = dp Vmin = 25.06 kN/m
𝑏𝑠
𝑉𝑒𝑑 23.1
• = <1 → ok
𝑉𝑝𝑙 𝑅𝑑 25.06
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Longitudinal shear verification:
𝐿𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏
• Area of shear diagram A2 = 𝑊𝑢 ∗ ∗ 𝐿𝑠
2
𝐿𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 3000
o Then Ls = = = 750 mm
4 4
𝐴𝑝 1
o Vl.Rd = bstrip dp (m * + 𝑘)
𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑝.𝐿𝑠 ɣ𝑣.𝑠
1178 1
o Vl.Rd = 1000 × 105 (184 × + 0.053) × 10-3 = 28.73 kN
1000 × 750 1.25
𝑉𝑒𝑑
• = 0.8 < 1 → ok
𝑉𝑝𝑙 𝑅𝑑
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Punching Verifications:
• Longitudinal Capacity:
• 𝑏𝑏 = 50 mm
• The effective width of slab is: 𝑏𝑚 = 𝑏𝑏 + 2 (ℎ𝑐 + ℎ𝑓 ) = 310 mm
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Transverse Reinforcement:
• 𝑎𝑚 = 𝑏𝑚 = 250 mm
• 𝜍 = ℎℎ𝑐 = 0.6
• 𝐹𝑑 = 𝑄𝐸𝑑 = 10.5 kN
10
• 𝑚𝐸𝑑.𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠 = 0.24𝐹𝑑 4√𝜍 = 2.22 KN.m/am (Resisted by width 𝑎𝑚 )
𝑚
• 𝑀𝐸𝑑.𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠 = 𝐸𝑑.𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠 = 8.88 kN.m/m
𝑎𝑚
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Final stage SLS Verifications:
• Deflection verification:
𝐸𝑎 210000
• n= 𝐸𝑐𝑚 → n= 29961.9 = 14.05
0.5(𝐸𝑐𝑚 + Φ ) 0.5(29961.9+ )
3
n∗ Ap 2 𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝∗ 𝑑𝑝
• 𝑥𝑐 = (-1 + √1 + ) = 44.7 mm
𝑏 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝 n∗ Ap
11
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Calculate the un-cracked section properties:
∑ 𝐴𝑖 . 𝑍𝑖
o 𝑥𝑢 = ∑ 𝐴𝑖
• 𝑙3 = 112 mm , 𝑙4 =164mm
• 𝑙1 = 𝑏𝑠 − 𝑙3 = 188mm
ℎ𝑐
𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝 ∗ hc3 𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝 ∗ hc ∗(𝑥𝑢− ) 𝑏𝑚 ∗ hp3 ℎ𝑝 ℎ𝑝 2
• Icu = + 2
+ + bm. . (ℎ − 𝑥𝑢 − ) + Ap (dp – 𝑥𝑢 )
12∗𝑛 𝑛 12∗𝑛 𝑛 2
2
+ Ip
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
12
• Deflection (Erection Stage):
𝐿3 5( 𝑔+𝑞 )
o δEd = [𝐹 + ∗ 𝑙]
48𝐸𝐼 8
o 𝛿𝐸𝑑.𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 = 4.9 mm
𝐿𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝛿𝐸𝑑.𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙
o 𝛿𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 = = 10mm → = 0.49 < 1 → OK
300 𝛿𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠
𝐿𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝛿𝐸𝑑.𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙
o 𝛿𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 = = 12 mm → = 0.4 < 1 → OK
250 𝛿𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝐿𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝛿𝐸𝑑.𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙
o 𝛿𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 = = 15 mm → = 0.32 < 1 → OK
200 𝛿𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Fire Verifications:
• Design actions:
13
• h1 = hc = 80 mm h2 = hp = 55 mm
• L1 = 188 mm L2 =136 mm L3 = 112 mm
2
• Lr = L2 + 2 √ℎ2 2 + (𝐿1 +𝐿2) = 258 mm
2
𝐿1 +𝐿2
• A = h2 × = 8910 mm2
2
𝐴
• = 34.53
𝐿𝑟
1 2 𝐿 −𝐿 2
• ɸ=
𝐿3
(√ℎ22 + (𝐿3 + 𝐿1 −𝐿2 ) − √ℎ22 + ( 1 2 2 ) ) = 0.783
2
15
𝑑𝑐 ℎ𝑝 𝑑𝑐 𝑑𝑐
• Mfi.Rd.sagging =Nlower *(ℎ − )+Nweb* (ℎ − − )+Nupper * (ℎ − ℎ𝑝 − )
2 2 2 2
𝑑𝑐
+ Ns.rib (ℎ − 𝑢3 − )
2
• Mfi.Rd.sagging = 3.72 kN.m (per rib)
• Mfi.Rd.sagging = 12.412 kN.m/m > 9.9 kN.m/m → ok
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• secondary Beams :
• Slab reactions at construction stage:
• Permanent actions:
• Variable actions:
16
• qk2 = 1.2*3.1=3.72 kN/m2
• Ed=47.028 kN/m
𝐿2
• M ED .final. = ED final. = 530.53 kN.m
8
𝐿
• V ED .final. = ED final. = 233.38 kN
2
• Beam verifications:
• Verifications of construction stage (ULS):
• Flexure (EN1993):
• Section classification:
235
• Since beam is under pure bending then α= 0.5 ⟶ ε =√ = 0.814
355
𝑏𝑓−𝑇𝑤
• C= − 𝑟 = 62.2 𝑚𝑚
2
𝑐
• 𝑡𝑓 = 5.1 < 9 then the flange is class 1
ε
17
• Web classification:
• d = ha – 2 tf – 2 r = 407.6 mm
𝑑
• 𝑡𝑤 = 55.63< 36/ α =72 then the web is class 1 ⟶ the whole section is class1
ε
o Shear (EN1993):
• hw = ha – 2 tf = 428 mm , η= 1
• η. tw . hw = 3852 mm2
• Av = Aa – 2 bf . tf + (tw + 2r) tf = 3775 mm2
• Av = max of (3775, 3852) = 3852 mm2
𝑓𝑦𝑎
𝐴𝑣( ) 355
• Vpl.Rd = √3
= 3852 * = 789.5 kN
ϒa √3
ℎ𝑤 ε
• =47.55 < 72 ∗ = 58.608 o.k then ,no shear buckling check is required
𝑡𝑤 η
𝑉𝐸𝐷.𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 51.58
• = = 0.065 < 1 ok
𝑉𝑝𝑙.𝑅𝑑 789.5
18
• Determination of effective width of concrete flange (beff):
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Determination of resistance moment of the section
• Determination of the depth of n.a. (Xc):
• Assume the n.a. is located within the concrete slab (Xc < hc)
• ((full shear connection is provided))
458
• hg = = 229 mm ht = h = 135mm
2
𝐹𝑦𝑎 Xc.nr1
• Mpl,rd=Aa* ∗ (ℎ𝑔 + ℎ − )
𝛾𝑎 2
19
• For two row of shear studs (nr = 2):
𝑓𝑦𝑎
𝐴𝑎 (
)
• Xc.nr2 = 𝑓𝑐𝑘.𝑛𝑤𝑐
ϒa
= 72.29 mm < hc=80 mm الفرض صحيح
0.85 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑓.𝑛𝑟2
ϒc
𝐹𝑦𝑎 Xc.nr2
• Mpl,rd=Aa* ∗ (ℎ𝑔 + ℎ − )
𝛾𝑎 2
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Shear :
•
Av = Aa – 2 bf . tf + (tw + 2r) tf = 3510.8 mm2
• η ⋅ tw ⋅ hw = 2676.8 mm2
• Av = max of (3510.8 , 2676.8) = 3510.8 mm2
𝑓𝑦𝑎
𝐴𝑣( ) 355
• Vpl.Rd = √3
= 3510.8* = 719.57 kN
ϒa √3
• D=ha-2*tf-2*r=360-2*12.7-2*18=298.6 mm
𝑑
• = 37.325 < 124𝜀 = 100.9 𝑠𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒
𝑡𝑤
𝑉𝑒𝑑 222.464
• = = 0.309 < 1 𝑜𝑘
𝑉𝑝𝑙,𝑟𝑑 719.57
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Verifications of Final stage (ULS) – partial shear connection:
• Shear connections:
20
• Assume using shear studs: dstud = 19 mm hstud = 125 mm
• hsc = hstud – 5 = 120 mm
• shear resistance of shear connectors:
• Concrete failure:
ℎ𝑠𝑐 120
• = = 6.316 > 4 then: α=1.0
𝑑𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑 19
• Ecm=32.836 Gpa
1
• PRd.1 = (0.29 . α . dstud2 . √𝑓𝑐𝑘. 𝑛𝑤𝑐 ∗ 𝐸𝑐𝑚 )
ϒv.s
1
• PRd.1 = (0.29 . 1 . 192 . √30 ∗ 32836.57) = 83.12 kN
1.25
2 1 2 1
• PRd.2 = 0.8 fu π dstud = 0.8 x 450 x π ∗19 x = 81.656 kN
4 ϒv.s 4 1.25
21
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
• Degree of shear connection:
• Ncf.steel.nr1 = 2580.85 kN
𝑓𝑐𝑘.𝑛𝑤𝑐
• Ncf.conc.nr1 = 0.85 hcc . beff.nr1 .
ϒc
• Ncf.conc.nr1 = 3740 kN
• Ncf.nr1 = min (Ncf.steel.nr1 , Ncf.conc.nr1) = 2580.85 kN
• Ncf.steel.nr2 = 2580.85 kN
22
• Maximum force in concrete
𝑓𝑐𝑘.𝑛𝑤𝑐
• Ncf.conc.nr2 = 0.85 hcc . beff.nr1 .
ϒc
• Ncf.conc.nr2 = 3927 kN
• Ncf.nr2 = min (Ncf.steel.nr2 , Ncf.conc.nr2) = 2580.85 kN
23