Delegation
Delegation
Delegation
Abstract – For effective management in an organization, the et al (2010) expounds on various characteristics of
top management must delegate some authority to the lower delegation which include : -
level of management. Through delegation, every manager (i) Functional Clarity.
becomes responsible and accountable for all the operations
This refers to the function to be done, methods of
under his department, division, section, unit etc. Delegation
facilitates co-operative efforts to the individuals working in an carrying out these functions and results expected must be
organization. Delegation is the assignment of authority and clearly defined.
responsibility to others in order to carry out these (ii) Matching Authority with Responsibility
assignments. Authority should match duties to be performed as well as
The top management cannot perform all the tasks of the personal capabilities of the subordinate.
organization and duties should be shared with immediate (iii) Unity of Command.
subordinates until all activities are assigned to persons who
In order to reduce conflict a subordinate should be
are made responsible to perform them. Delegation of authority
may either be formal or informal i.e. it may be put down in answerable to one superior.
writing detailing exactly what authority is delegated or it may (iv) Principle of Communication –
be merely mutually understood by both the superior and the Lines of communication should be kept open for issuing
subordinates. Authority delegated must be spelt out clearly to directives and receiving feedback.
avoid ambiguity which may result in misinterpretation by the (v) Principle of Management by Exception —
subordinate who may exceed the authority given to him or not Delegation can be applied to subordinates for routine
fully utilize the authority and may end up taking every
duties and decisions making. However, the management
problem to the superior for decision making.
must retain tasks for themselves which they alone are
Keywords – Delegation, Organizations, Responsibilities, uniquely qualified to perform.
Department, Subordinates.
IV. FACTORS THAT LEAD TO EFFECTIVE
I. INTRODUCTION DELEGATION
For effective management in an organization the top There are various factors that lead to effective delegation
management must delegate some authority to the lower (Kansas, 2012). These include:
level of management. Through delegation every manager (i) Define Assignment:
becomes responsible and accountable for all the operations Delegation can be effective only when duties and
under his Department, Division, Section, Unit etc. functions to be performed are properly analyzed and
Delegation facilitates co-operative efforts of the individuals classified according to various levels of delegation.
working in an organization.
(ii) Select the Person in the Light of the Job to be
done.
II. DEFINITION The person should be carefully selected bearing in mind
Delegation is the assignment of authority and the requirement of the job to be performed. This should be
responsibility to others in order to carry out these based on experience, skills and general capabilities.
assignments (Bell & Bodie, 2012). The top management (iii) Maintain Open Line of Communication.
cannot perform all the tasks of the organization and duties There should be clear understanding between superior
should be shared with immediate subordinates until all and subordinate about the nature and extent of authority
activities are assigned to persons who are made responsible delegated. Other members related with the activities should
to perform them. Delegation of authority may be either be informed about the extent to which the delegatee is
formal or informal i.e. it may be put down in writing allowed to take decisions. Free communication is necessary
detailing exactly what authority is delegated or it may be for effective delegation.
merely mutually understood by both the superior and the (iv) Training of Subordinate.
subordinates. The subordinate should be trained to use the authority
Authority delegated must be spelt out clearly to avoid delegated to him/her. The delegatee should be familiar with
ambiguity which may result in misinterpretation by the the plans and policies of the organization, so
subordinate who may exceed the authority given to him or that they can take correct decisions.
not fully utilize the authority and may end up taking every (v) Delegate Authority Commensurate to Results
problem to the superior for decision making. Expected.
The subordinate should be told about results expected
III. PRINCIPLES OF DELEGATION from them. How they achieve these results is left to them.
The top management will determine goals to be achieved
Delegation of authority should be result oriented. Sahni but it is left to the middle and lower level management to
Copyright © 2018 IJIRES, All right reserved
415
International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 4, ISSN (Online) : 2349–5219
decide what action should be taken to achieve (a) Insecurity where the departmental head is reluctant to
the goal. take 'chances' and delegate tasks as they are
(vi) Establish Proper Control. accountable for the actions of their subordinates.
Authority can be delegated but responsibilities cannot be (b) The departmental head may feel the loss of power if
shifted to subordinates. The superior should ensure that subordinates do too good a job probably better than
delegated authority is properly used by the subordinates. they would have done.
(vii) Attitude of Management. (c) Some Departmental heads are unable to plan ahead and
Effectiveness of delegation depends on attitude of to decide which task are to be delegated and to whom.
management towards delegation. Management should be (ii) Reluctance to accept Delegation (Subordinates)
willing to delegate authority to lower levels. However, if (a) Insecurity — many subordinates may wish that their
the delegated authority is being misused or the subordinate heads make decisions instead of being held responsible
is not able to give expected results then the authority can be for any failure. This often arises due to the fact that
withdrawn. there is lack of confidence on the part of the head who
may not accept the 'failure' by his subordinates as a
V. THE PROCESS OF DELEGATION normal thing.
(b) The subordinates may not be given enough incentives
The process consists of three steps : - for assuming the responsibilities. Taking more
(i) Allocation of work Duties to Subordinates. responsibilities means working harder and if there is no
- Determine what subordinates are supposed to do. adequate compensation then the subordinate may be
- Consider capabilities of each subordinate and match unwilling to accept the delegated tasks.
them with assigned duties. (iii) Wrong grouping of Departmental activities
(ii) Delegation of Authority and Extent of Delegation. If the activities to be performed by the department are not
- Give authority to subordinates to make decisions and properly grouped then delegation becomes difficult.
implement the decisions on relevant matters (Dunham (iv) Unwillingness to trust the Subordinates or Lack of
and Pierce, 1989). Confidence in the Abilities of the Subordinates.
- The authority must be stated clearly and possibly put in Many times superiors do not have faith in the abilities of
writing to avoid ambiguity and indecision. their subordinates and therefore keep on postponing
- The authority should be related to tasks so that if tasks delegation until the subordinates gain more experience.
change then authority also changes. (v) Desire for Personal Credit
(iii) Creation of Obligation. Some superiors would like to claim personal credit for the
This is obligation on part of the subordinate to perform successful operation of the organization through his own
their duties satisfactorily. efforts not the efforts of the delegatee.
(vi) Fear that Subordinates will make Mistakes
VI. ADVANTAGES OF DELEGATION Some superiors fear that the subordinates will make
mistakes if authority and responsibilities are delegated to
When used properly delegation has several advantages them.
(Parikh, 2017). (vii) Belief that it is Easier to do the Job than to Train
These are:- the Subordinate to do So.
(i) It results in quick decisions. Some superiors prefer doing the job and then delegating
(ii) Delegation gives executives more time for strategic the authority to them. The superior thinks that the
planning and policy making. Strategic planning is done subordinate will not do the job effectively as himself. He
at top management and the day to day decisions are also feels secure while supervising the job himself even for
made at lower management levels. minor details.
(iii) Delegation is a motivating factor. Subordinate respond (viii) Fear that Subordinates will Surpass their
to delegated authority with favorable attitude and this Superiors
creates a sense of responsibility and dedication Some superiors are afraid to delegate authority to capable
resulting in pride and morale boosting. subordinates because they know that these subordinates are
(iv) Delegation can be a training ground for executive better talented than them. Such superiors therefore suppress
ability. By being allowed to analyze and make their subordinates’ talents by not giving the subordinates
decisions accordingly this prepares the subordinates for any chance.
problem solving process when they reach the executive (ix) Unwillingness of Subordinates to Assume the
level. Authority.
If the subordinates are not capable of taking decisions and
VII. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE DELEGATION assuming authority then they are likely to consult their
superiors even for minor details. They do not want to
(i) Reluctance to Delegate (Superiors). assume authority because they are afraid of the failure and
Superiors may prefer not to delegate tasks as they can do do not want to take responsibility for the failure.
the tasks better or their subordinate are not capable. This
feelings may come up due to:
Copyright © 2018 IJIRES, All right reserved
416
International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 4, ISSN (Online) : 2349–5219