Lecture 1-Introduction To Bridge Design
Lecture 1-Introduction To Bridge Design
Introduction to Bridge
Engineering
Dr. Hazim Dwairi
The Hashemite University
Presentation Outline
Component of Bridges
Types of Bridges
Which Type of Bridges to Use
AASHTO LRFD 2012 Requirements
1
Components of Bridge
Substructure Superstructure
Foundation (pile/spread) Any structure above pier
Pier (column) which supports roadway
Abutment Wearing surface
Parapet
Bridge Components
2
Bridge Components
Bridge Components
3
Bridge Components
Bridge Components
4
Bridge Components
Drainage of the Bridge Deck
Bridge Components
Expansion Joints (Modular Joint)
10
10
5
Bridge Components
Expansion Joints (Neoprene Joint)
11
11
Bridge Components
Expansion Joints (Single Strip Joint)
12
12
6
Bridge Components
Expansion Joints (Finger Strip Joint)
13
13
Bridge Components
Intermediate Diaphragm
14
14
7
Bridge Components
Steel/Rocker Bearing Type
15
15
Bridge Components
Spherical Bearing Type
16
16
8
Bridge Components
Elastomeric Bearing Type
17
17
Bridge Components
Multi-Column Bent
18
18
9
Bridge Components
Hammerhead Bent
19
19
Bridge Components
Wall Type Bent
20
20
10
Types of Bridges
Classification According to:
Type of Traffic
Type of Traffic Position
Type Material and Fabrication
Type of Structural System
21
21
Type of Traffic
Highway Bridges (trucks, cars)
22
22
11
Type of Traffic
Pedestrian Bridges (pedestrians, bicycles)
23
23
Type of Traffic
Railway Bridges (trains)
24
24
12
Type of Traffic
Transit Guideway (LRT, monorail)
25
25
Type of Traffic
Other types (pipelines, utilities, industrial)
26
26
13
Type of Traffic
Other types (pipelines, utilities, industrial)
27
27
28
14
Deck Type
29
29
Through Type
30
30
15
Through Type
31
31
32
32
16
Half-Through Type
33
33
34
17
Type of Material & Fabrication
35
35
36
36
18
Type of Material & Fabrication
37
37
38
38
19
Type of Structural System
Arch
Beam/Girder
Cantilever
Cable-Stayed
Suspension
Others
39
39
Arch Bridges
40
40
20
Arch Bridges
Semi-circle: vertical
reactions only at supports
Flat arch: vertical &
horizontal forces at supports
Tied arch: (ties resist tension
forces)
41
41
Arch Bridges
42
21
Concrete Arch Bridge
43
43
44
44
22
Steel Arch Bridge
45
45
Slab Bridges
46
46
23
Beam/Girder Bridges
The most basic type
of bridge
Consists of a beam
simply supported on
each side by a pier
and can be made
continuous later
Typically,
inexpensive to build
47
47
Beam/Girder Bridges
Common Materials
Timber truss
RC Beam
Steel Plate Girder/ Box Girder
Steel Truss Girder
Prestressed Concrete Precast Girder
I-beam, U-beam, T-beam
Segmentally prestressed box girder
48
48
24
Beam/Girder Bridges
49
49
Beam/Girder Bridges
50
50
25
Beam/Girder Bridges
51
51
Beam/Girder Bridges
52
26
Beam/Girder Bridges
53
53
Beam/Girder Bridges
54
27
Beam/Girder Bridges
Segmental bridges can be
constructed in two ways:
Span by span
Cantilever balanced
Span by span
Cantilever Balanced
55
55
Cantilever Bridges
Bridge roadway is constructed out from the pier in
two direction at the same time so that the weight on
both side counterbalance each other
Steel Truss Cantilever
Prestressed Concrete Segmental Cantilever Beam
56
56
28
Cantilever Bridges
Steel Truss Cantilever Bridge
57
57
Cantilever Bridges
Steel Truss Cantilever Bridge
58
58
29
Cantilever Bridges
Prestressed Concrete Segmental Cantilever
Beam
59
59
60
60
30
Cable-Stayed Bridge
Harp Type
Fan Type
61
61
Cable-Stayed Bridge
62
62
31
Suspension Bridges
Suspension bridge needs to have very strong main cable
Cables are anchored at the abutment abutment must be
massive
63
63
Suspension Bridges
64
64
32
Suspension Bridges
65
65
Suspension Bridges
66
66
33
Suspension Bridges
67
67
Suspension Bridges
68
68
34
Others
69
69
70
35
Span Length
71
71
Span Length
72
72
36
Cost vs. Span Length
The span length may be influenced by the cost
of superstructure (cost/meter) and
substructure (cost/pier)
If the substructure cost is about 25% of total
cost shorter span is more cost-effective
If the substructure cost is about 50% of total
cost longer spans are more economical
73
73
74
74
37
Cost vs. Span Length
75
75
76
76
38
Beam Spacing
Beam spacing determine the
number of girders
Large Spacing
Fewer girder (faster to erect)
Deeper and heavier girder (can it
be transported?)
Reduced redundancy
Thicker slab
Smaller Spacing
More girder
Smaller girder
More redundancy (but more beams
to inspect)
Thinner slab
77
77
Materials
Steel
Concrete
Cast-in-place
Precast
Material choice depends on the cost of
material at the bridge site
Shipping cost from fabricators
78
78
39
Speed of construction
In urban areas, the construction of bridge may
disrupt traffic
Prefabricated/ Precast member are the only
choice
Substructure construction may disrupt traffic
more than the superstructure erection may
consider longer spans
79
79
Site Requirement
Is the bridge straight or curved
Precast I-Girder cannot be curved
Segmental prestressed can have slight curve
Cast-in-place
Is shipping channel required?
Shipping of prefabricated pieces to site
Is the temporary false work required? Can it
be done with the site conditions?
80
80
40
Site Requirement
81
81
Site Requirement
82
82
41
Site Requirement
83
83
Site Requirement
84
84
42
Aesthetics
An ugly bridge, however safe, serviceable, and
inexpensive, is not a good bridge
Long span bridge over a river can be a landmark;
thus, aesthetics should be an important factor
Bridge should blend with the environment
Smooth transition between members
Avoid unnecessary decorations
Bridge should have an appearance of adequate
strength
85
85
Aesthetics
Determinant of bridge’s appearance (in order of importance)
Vertical and Horizontal geometry relative to surrounding topography
and other structures
Superstructure type: arch, girder, etc…
Pier placement
Abutment placement
Superstructure shape, parapet and railing
Pier shape
Abutment shape
Color, surface texture, ornamentations
Signing, Lighting, Landscaping
86
86
43
Aesthetics
87
87
Aesthetics
88
88
44
Aesthetics
89
89
Aesthetics
90
90
45
Aesthetics
91
91
92
92
46
LRFD design concept
LRFD is a load-resistance
factor design method.
It’s a reliability-based
approach for evaluating
probability-based factored
design criteria.
It can be represented by
graphing the relationship
between frequency
distributions of actual load
and resistance .
93
93
94
94
47
LRFD design concept
The strength resistance factors Ф, , giving a reasonable and
economical difference between R and W , are given by the
table:
95
95
Truck Load
96
96
48
H 20 vs HS 20
97
97
98
98
49
Lane Load
Lane Load No Dynamic Load Allowance
99
99
100
50
HL-93 Live Load
Design Truck & Lane Load
9.3kN/m
35kN 145kN 145kN
9.3kN/m
101
101
102
102
51
Fatigue Load
Place design truck in a single lane
4.3m 9.0m
103
103
104
52
FEM Analysis of Bridges
105
105
Dalleh Bridge-A
106
106
53
FEM Analysis of Bridges
Dalleh Bridge-A
Typical Bending
Moment Diagram
107
107
Dalleh Bridge-A
Typical Shear Force
Diagram
108
108
54