Lessons Learned Template 24

PROJECT NAME
Lessons Learned Report
Prepared by: Author
PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT
The purpose of the Lessons Learned Report is to pass on any lessons that can be usefully
applied to other projects. The data in the report should be used by a corporate group, such
as quality assurance, who are responsible for the quality management system, in order to
refine, change and improve the standards. Statistics on how much effort was needed for
products can help improve future estimating.
RACI
Responsible Accountable Consult Inform
Project Manager Project Board & PMO, Business
Project Executive Analyst, Business
Owner, Infrastructure,
Applications, Service
Management,
Research IT, FRMs
Guidance Note: This should show who is responsible, accountable, consulted and informed
with regard the document
DOCUMENT CONTROL
CHANGE CONTROL TABLE
Version Amendment Description Release Date Updated by
APPROVALS
Approver Title Date of issue Version
DISTRIBUTION
This document has been distributed to:
Name Title Date of issue Version
IT Services: Projects and Change Queen Mary University of London – Pr

2
Contents
1 Management Summary................................................................................................................ 4
2 What management, project activities and quality processes went well?...............................4
3 What management, project activities and quality processes went badly?.............................4
4 What management, project activities and quality processes were lacking?..........................4
5 Description of any abnormal events which caused deviations...............................................4
6 Assessment of technical methods and tools used...................................................................4
7 Analysis of project Issues and their results..............................................................................4
8 Recommendations for future enhancement or modification of the project management

method.................................................................................................................................................. 4
9 Effort required to create the products.......................................................................................4
10 Effectiveness of Quality Reviews and other error trapping exercise..................................4
11 Lessons Learned Log.................................................................................................................. 4

3
1 Management Summary
Guidance Note: Provide a general summary of the lessons learned, drawing the reader’s
attention to the main areas of interest.
2 What management, project activities and quality processes went well?

Guidance Note: Describe the management, project, and quality processes that went well.
3 What management, project activities and quality processes went badly?

Guidance Note: Describe the management, project, and quality processes that went badly.
4 What management, project activities and quality processes were lacking?

Guidance Note: Describe the management, project, and quality processes that were lacking,
e.g. unsuitable for the work undertaken.
5 Description of any abnormal events which caused deviations

Guidance Note: Describe any abnormal events (e.g. events outside the control of the
project) which caused deviation from the project plan.
6 Assessment of technical methods and tools used

Guidance Note: Give an assessment of the main technical methods and tools used on the
project.
7 Analysis of project Issues and their results

Guidance Note: Provide an analysis of the project issues and how they impacted the project.
8 Recommendations for future enhancement or modification of the project

management method
Guidance Note: Provide any recommendations for enhancing or modifying the project
Gateway Process.
9 Effort required to create the products

Guidance Note: Provide any available useful measures on how much effort was required to
create the various products.

4
10 Effectiveness of Quality Reviews and other error trapping exercise
Guidance Note: For example, statistics on how many errors were found after products had
passed a quality review or test.
11 Lessons Learned Log

Guidance Note: This should include entries from the project Lessons Learned Log collected
during the lifetime of the project and any lessons captured during the project closure.

5

Lessons Learned Template 24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lessons Learned Template 24

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lessons Learned Template 24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT NAME

Lessons Learned Report

Prepared by: Author

CHANGE CONTROL TABLE

Version Amendment Description Release Date Updated by

Approver Title Date of issue Version

Name Title Date of issue Version

IT Services: Projects and Change Queen Mary University of London – Pr

2 What management, project activities and quality processes went well?...............................4

3 What management, project activities and quality processes went badly?.............................4

4 What management, project activities and quality processes were lacking?..........................4

5 Description of any abnormal events which caused deviations...............................................4

6 Assessment of technical methods and tools used...................................................................4

7 Analysis of project Issues and their results..............................................................................4

8 Recommendations for future enhancement or modification of the project management

9 Effort required to create the products.......................................................................................4

10 Effectiveness of Quality Reviews and other error trapping exercise..................................4

11 Lessons Learned Log.................................................................................................................. 4

IT Services: Projects and Change Queen Mary University of London – Pr

2 What management, project activities and quality processes went well?

3 What management, project activities and quality processes went badly?

4 What management, project activities and quality processes were lacking?

5 Description of any abnormal events which caused deviations

6 Assessment of technical methods and tools used

7 Analysis of project Issues and their results

8 Recommendations for future enhancement or modification of the project

9 Effort required to create the products

IT Services: Projects and Change Queen Mary University of London – Pr

11 Lessons Learned Log

IT Services: Projects and Change Queen Mary University of London – Pr

You might also like