Jag Faqs

Bureau of Justice Assistance
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice

Assistance Grant (JAG) Program
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
The Department of Justice is committed to advancing work that promotes civil rights,
increases access to justice, supports crime victims, protects the public from crime and
evolving threats, and builds trust between law enforcement and the community.
CONTENTS
Overview
Award Eligibility/Formula Information
Potential Funding Reductions
Application Requirements
Disparate Information
Use of Funds
Reporting Requirements
Award Administration
OVERVIEW
1. What is the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program?
Named after Edward “Eddie” R. Byrne, an officer in the New York City Police
Department who was murdered while protecting a witness in a drug case, the Edward
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program is the leading source of federal
justice funding to state and local jurisdictions. The JAG Program provides states, tribes,
and local governments with critical funding necessary to support a range of program
areas including law enforcement, prosecution, indigent defense, courts, crime prevention
and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement,
planning, evaluation, technology improvement, crime victim and witness initiatives,
mental health programs, and related law enforcement and corrections programs,
including behavioral programs and crisis intervention teams, and implementation of state
crisis intervention court proceedings and related programs or initiatives including, but not
limited to, mental health courts, drug courts, veterans courts, and extreme risk protection
order programs. The JAG Program Fact Sheet provides background information and
other details about the JAG Program.
2. What is the authorizing legislation for the JAG program?

The JAG Program statute is Subpart I of Part E of Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control
These FAQs are for reference only and to assist states and units of local government. These FAQs do not supersede any conflicting
guidance provided in the relevant JAG State or JAG Local solicitations or grant award documents.
Updated June 2023

1
and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (codified at 34 U.S.C. 10151–10158); Title I of Pub. L. No.
90-351 (generally codified at 34 U.S.C. 10151–10726); see also 28 U.S.C. 530C(a).
3. What is the Assistance Listing number for the JAG program?

The Assistance Listing number for the JAG Program (state and local) is 16.738.
AWARD ELIGIBILITY/FORMULA INFORMATION
4. What entities are eligible, and where is the eligibility list located?
There are two types of formula awards available under the JAG Program.
• JAG state awards: Only states may apply under this solicitation, and states must
designate a single State Administering Agency (SAA) that has authority to apply on
their behalf. By law, for purposes of the JAG Program, the term “states” includes the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana
Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
• JAG local awards: Only units of local government appearing on the JAG Allocations
List may apply under this solicitation. The full list of eligible units of local
governments for the current fiscal year, once available, will be posted on the JAG
web page at: www.bja.gov/jag. By law, for purposes of the JAG Program, the term
“units of local government” includes a town, township, village, parish, city, county,
borough, or other general-purpose political subdivision of a state, or it may be a
federally recognized Indian tribal government that performs law enforcement
functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior). A unit of local government
may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under
applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose
taxes; for example, in Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney
or parish sheriff.
Note: The application must be submitted by an applicant with a Unique Entity

Identifier (UEI) associated with an entity that is eligible to apply to receive an
award. See the How to Apply section for more information.
5. Why are two eligibility categories included within the Local JAG solicitation?
Beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2020, there are two categories for eligible units of local
government to apply under as stipulated below. This change was intended to streamline
and expedite the application process, as well as reduce the burden of certain types of
reporting for eligible applicants receiving awards of less than $25,000.
Category 1—Eligible Allocation Amounts of Less Than $25,000: Units of local

government that are listed on the JAG web page as eligible for an allocation amount of
less than $25,000 should apply under Category 1. This includes direct and joint
(disparate) allocations. Category 1 awards of less than $25,000 are 2 years in length.
Extensions of up to 2 years can be requested for these awards via JustGrants no fewer
than 30 days prior to the grant end date and will be automatically granted upon request.
Category 2—Eligible Allocation Amounts of $25,000 or More: Units of local government
Updated June 2023

2
that are listed on the JAG web page as eligible for an allocation amount of $25,000 or
more should apply under Category 2. This includes direct and joint (disparate)
allocations. Category 2 awards of at least $25,000 are 4 years in length. Extensions
beyond this period may be made on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Bureau
of Justice Assistance (BJA) and must be requested via JustGrants no fewer than 30
days prior to the grant end date.
All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications
or additional requirements that may be imposed by statute.
6. How is the formula calculated?

JAG awards are based on a statutory formula as described below:
Once each fiscal year’s overall JAG Program funding level is determined, BJA works
with the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to begin a four-step grant award calculation
process, which, in general, consists of:
1. Computing an initial JAG allocation for each state based on its share of violent
crime and population (weighted equally).
2. Reviewing the initial JAG allocation amount to determine whether the state
allocation is less than the minimum award amount defined in the JAG legislation
(0.25 percent of the total). If this is the case, the state is funded at the minimum
level, and the funds required for this are deducted from the overall pool of JAG
funds. Each of the remaining states receives the minimum award plus an
additional amount based on its share of violent crime and population.
3. Dividing each state’s final award amount (except for the territories and District of
Columbia) between the state and its units of local governments at a rate of 60
and 40 percent, respectively.
4. Determining the unit of local government award allocations, which are based on
their proportion of the state’s 3-year violent crime average. If the eligible award
amount for a particular unit of local government as determined on this basis is
$10,000 or more, then the unit of local government is eligible to apply directly to
the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) (under the JAG Local solicitation) for a JAG
award. If the eligible award amount to a particular unit of local government as
determined on this basis would be less than $10,000, the funds are not made
available for a direct award to that particular unit of local government but instead
are added to the amount that otherwise would have been awarded to the state.
(The state’s obligations with respect to this additional amount for the “less than
$10,000 jurisdictions” are summarized below in “Are states required to pass-
through funding to local jurisdictions?”)
The BJS technical reports that describe the steps used to calculate the JAG formula, in
detail, can be found at JAG Technical Reports | Bureau of Justice Statistics (ojp.gov).
7. Why would a local jurisdiction not receive an allocation?

Eligible allocations under the JAG program are posted annually on the JAG web page
under “Funding Information.”
Updated June 2023

3
A jurisdiction is eligible to receive a direct JAG award only if the formula allocation is
$10,000 or more and they are not part of a disparate group (see “Disparate Information”).
Awards allocations to units of local government are based on the share of violent crimes
reported by the law enforcement agencies in the state. The sum of these reports within
each state are computed to determine the jurisdiction’s share of the total local award
allocation. If a local jurisdiction’s calculated allocation is less than $10,000, the funds are
provided to the state. The state must allocate the additional funds included in its award to
jurisdictions that were not eligible for a direct BJA JAG award of $10,000 or more and/or
to state police departments that provide criminal justice services to the “less than $10,000
jurisdictions” within the state. Additionally, a jurisdiction can reach out to its respective
State Administering Agency (SAA) to inquire what their subaward process will be for the
less than $10,000 JAG funding.
8. Is there funding available for jurisdictions that do not qualify for a direct award?
Jurisdictions that do not qualify for a direct award under the JAG Program may reach out
to their respective State Administering Agency (SAA) to determine whether subaward
funding is available. SAA contact information can be found at: State Administering
Agencies | Overview | Office of Justice Programs.
9. Are states required to pass-through funding to local jurisdictions?

There are two types of pass-through requirements for states. A state that applies for and
receives a JAG award must:
• Pass through a predetermined percentage of funds to “units of local
government.” (For purposes of the JAG Program, a “unit of local government”
includes a city, county, township, town, and certain federally recognized Indian
tribes.) This predetermined percentage (often referred to as the variable pass-
through, or “VPT”) is calculated by OJP’s BJS, based on the total criminal justice
expenditures by the state and its units of local government. The variable pass-
through percentages that will apply to an award to a recipient state can be found
at: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program | JAG
Variable Pass-Through (VPT) Information | Bureau of Justice Assistance. (If a
state believes the VPT percentage has been calculated incorrectly, the state may
provide pertinent, verifiable data to BJA and ask OJP to reconsider.)
• Appropriately use or distribute those funds that are added to the state’s award
because certain units of local government within the state are ineligible for a
direct award of JAG funds because the unit of local government’s calculated
allocation is less than $10,000 (these units of local government sometimes are
referred to as “less-than-$10,000 jurisdictions”). The state must provide these
additional funds included in its JAG award to state police departments that
provide criminal justice services to the “less than $10,000 jurisdictions” within the
state and/or subaward the funds to such jurisdictions.
10. Is it possible for a recipient to make subawards to private and nonprofit

neighborhood or community-based organizations?
A JAG recipient can make a subaward to private and nonprofit neighborhood or
community-based organizations if the primary purpose of the subaward meets the
requirements of one or more JAG Program areas under 34 U.S.C. § 10152 (a)(1). Such
Updated June 2023

4
projects could take the form of (1) a project that would benefit the entire state, (2) a
project that will benefit a local jurisdiction, or (3) a partnership between a private
nonprofit organization and a local law enforcement agency to provide allowable services
to designated "units of local government.” Note: A State Administering Agency (SAA)
may not use required pass-through funds to make subawards to private and
nonprofit neighborhood or community-based organizations without express prior
approval from BJA through a Grant Award Modification (GAM). See “Award
Administration.”
See 34 U.S.C. § 10152(b), which states,

[a] State or unit of local government may, in using a grant under [the JAG award],
use all or a portion of that grant to contract with or make one or more subawards
to one or more
(1) Neighborhood or community-based organizations that are private and
nonprofit
(2) Units of local government
11. How does National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) reporting impact
eligibility for funding under the JAG program?
By statute, BJA JAG awards are calculated using summary part 1 violent crime data
from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI’s) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)
Program. Specifically, the formula allocations for JAG rely heavily on the ratio of “the
average number of part 1 violent crimes of the UCR of the FBI reported by such State for
the three most recent years reported by such State to the average annual number of
such crimes reported by all States for such years” (34 U.S.C. 10156(a)(1)(B)).
Historically, JAG calculations have been based on data collected by the FBI through the
UCR’s Summary Reporting System (SRS).
As of January 1, 2021, the UCR Program phased out SRS and transitioned to NIBRS-
only data collection and agencies are no longer able to submit SRS data. BJS uses a
combination of NIBRS and SRS data in determining eligibility, with NIBRS data being
used from 2021 forward. In practice, if a jurisdiction has previously reported at least 3
years of SRS data during the prior 10-year period (2012–2021) and did not begin
reporting NIBRS data in 2021, the jurisdiction will still be potentially eligible for a JAG
award, as the jurisdiction still meets the minimum statutory requirement. Agencies that
began reporting NIBRS data in 2021 but have not previously reported SRS data or who
reported fewer than 2 years of SRS data during the 2012–2021 data years will not be
eligible for an award. For more information on NIBRS, please see: National Incident-
Based Reporting System (NIBRS) | Bureau of Justice Statistics.
12. Is a National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) 3 percent set-aside

required for JAG recipients not certified as NIBRS compliant?
BJA required, through the application of an award condition, direct FY 2018 1–FY 2021
JAG award recipients not certified as NIBRS compliant to set aside 3 percent of their
JAG award toward achieving full compliance with the FBI’s NIBRS data submission
1
U.S. territories and tribal jurisdictions were not subject to the 3 percent NIBRS set-aside in FY 2018.
Updated June 2023

5
requirements under the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. For FY 2022 awards
and moving forward, BJA will no longer require recipients to dedicate 3 percent of their
award toward NIBRS compliance. Note: this is not a retroactive change and FY 2018–
2021 JAG award recipients that have not yet reached NIBRS compliance must continue
to meet the NIBRS set-aside requirement.
13. Does the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) set-aside

requirement for FY 2018–2021 awards apply to subawards?
The requirement for a NIBRS set-aside is not applicable to subawards from states.
Rather, state JAG recipients must ensure that at least 3 percent of the total award
amount is used toward NIBRS compliance, unless the FBI has certified that the state is
already NIBRS compliant.
The requirement for a NIBRS set-aside is applicable to all jurisdictions in a disparate

group but is not otherwise be applied to subawards. Recipients serving as fiscal agent
for “disparate jurisdictions” (as defined at 34 U.S.C. 10156(d)(4)) must pass this
requirement through to subawards in other localities in the disparate jurisdiction so that
each locality in a disparate jurisdiction group dedicates at least 3 percent of award funds
to NIBRS compliance unless, with respect to each locality in the disparate jurisdiction
group, evidence of NIBRS compliance has been submitted to and approved by BJA.
14. How should FY 2018–2021 JAG recipients communicate National Incident-Based

Reporting System (NIBRS) compliance to BJA?
Grant recipients that achieve full compliance with NIBRS should email evidence of
NIBRS compliance (written documentation from the FBI and/or their state-certified
NIBRS compliance) to their grant manager listed in OJP’s JustGrants System. Upon
review of the documentation submitted, BJA will confirm the NIBRS compliance and then
clear any withholding special condition associated with the NIBRS set-aside
requirement. Grant recipients must retain documentation on file that demonstrates the
FBI certification of NIBRS compliance. Such documentation must be made available for
BJA review upon request.
15. What are some examples of costs and projects that relate to National Incident-
Based Reporting System (NIBRS) implementation?
Examples of costs and projects that relate to NIBRS implementation at the state or local
level that could be funded under the JAG Program include: software, hardware, and
labor that directly support or enhance a state or agency’s technical capacity for
collecting, processing, and analyzing data reported by local law enforcement (LE)
agencies and then submitting NIBRS data to the FBI; training personnel responsible for
the state’s Incident Based Reporting (IBR) Program on receiving, processing, analyzing,
and validating incident-based data from local LE agencies in their state; training local
agencies in how to collect and submit NIBRS data; and technical assistance for LE
agency personnel responsible for (1) managing the agency’s crime incident data, (2)
processing and validating the data, and (3) extracting and submitting IBR data to the
state Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program according to the states and/or directly to
the FBI according to the NIBRS standard.
Updated June 2023

6
16. If our state or unit of local government has already budgeted funding for National
Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) related projects, should JAG funds still
be set aside for this purpose for FY 2018–2021 awards?
The NIBRS 3 percent set-aside is applicable for FY 2018–2021 awards until the FBI (or
state for local units) has certified NIBRS compliance. States and units of local
government should be cognizant of supplanting and not budget JAG funds for the exact
same NIBRS-related project. For example, if local funds are budgeted for software, then
JAG funds could be set aside to support training. Once a state or unit of local
government is certified as NIBRS compliant, the grantee may submit a programmatic
cost change Grant Award Modification (GAM) to BJA and reallocate any remaining set-
aside funds.
POTENTIAL FUNDING REDUCTIONS
17. Are JAG awards subject to any potential funding reductions?

A state allocation of a JAG award is subject to three potential funding reductions for
noncompliance under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), the
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), and the Death in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA).
18. What is the potential funding reduction under the Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act (SORNA)?
SORNA, which is Title I of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
mandates a 10 percent reduction in JAG award to a state that has failed to substantially
implement SORNA. For such states, the 10 percent reduction has been applied to JAG
awards since FY 2012 and will continue to be applied in each subsequent year until the
JAG recipient has substantially implemented SORNA. Further, states that have
substantially implemented SORNA have an ongoing obligation to maintain that status
each year. A JAG reduction will be applied each year that a jurisdiction fails to
substantially implement SORNA.
A reduction of a JAG award to a state under the provisions of SORNA will not affect the
portion of the JAG award that is reserved for local jurisdictions.
For Frequently Asked Questions on SORNA, please refer to https://smart.ojp.gov/faqs.
19. How is the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) funding
reduction calculated?
The example below illustrates how the SORNA funding reduction is assessed against a
state that did not implement SORNA.
If BJA initially calculated that the state is eligible to receive a JAG allocation of
$3,000,000, the 10 percent JAG reduction would be calculated as follows:
1. The mandatory pass-through amount of $1,200,000 (based on the state’s
mandatory 40 percent pass-through) is subtracted from the $3,000,000, resulting
in $1,800,000.
2. The “less than $10,000” allocation for the state ($250,000) is then added to the
Updated June 2023

7
$1,800,000, resulting in $2,050,000.
3. The 10 percent JAG reduction is then assessed on the $2,050,000 amount
($2,050,000 × .10), resulting in a SORNA penalty of $205,000 for the state.
Note: For the District of Columbia and the territories, the JAG reduction will be assessed
on the full allocation because the entire allocation goes to the district or territorial
government.
20. Is a state eligible for additional JAG funding based on its Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) compliance status?
SORNA-compliant states and territories may have bonus funds applied to their next fiscal
year JAG application. This bonus allocation is calculated based on total funds resulting
from the JAG reductions from non-implementing states and territories during that current
fiscal year. For example, if a state substantially implemented SORNA in FY 2022, then
that state would have additional bonus funds added to its FY 2013 State JAG award,
which will be comprised of JAG reductions from non-implementing states and territories in
FY 2022. The amounts available for bonus funds will vary from year to year, depending
on the amount of JAG reductions that are assessed.
21. Whom can I contact for more information on the JAG reduction or Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) penalty, SORNA compliance, or the
implementation of SORNA?
For additional information regarding SORNA implementation, including requirements and
a list of states that will be affected by the 10 percent reduction to JAG awards, contact
the OJP Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and
Tracking (SMART Office) at ASKSMART@usdoj.gov or 202–514–9320.
22. What is required under the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) certification
requirement, and what is the funding reduction for failure to comply?
In 2012, DOJ published the National Standards to Prevent, Detect, and Respond to
Prison Rape (PREA Standards), which were promulgated to prevent, detect, and
respond to sexual victimization and abuse in confinement settings. The National PREA
Standards are set out at 28 C.F.R. Part 115 and apply to confinement facilities, including
adult prisons and jails, juvenile facilities, and police lockups.
The PREA statute provides that a state whose Governor does not certify full compliance
with DOJ’s PREA Standards (34 U.S.C. 30307(e)) is subject to the loss of 5 percent of
any DOJ grant funds that it would otherwise receive for prison purposes, unless the
Governor submits to the Attorney General an assurance that such 5 percent will be used
by the state solely to adopt and achieve full compliance with the PREA Standards in
future years. In addition, the Justice for All Reauthorization Act (JFARA) of 2016, which
was enacted on December 16, 2016, includes an amendment to the PREA statute. Per
the PREA amendment under JFARA, the assurance option sunset was effective on
December 16, 2022 (See 34 U.S.C. § 30307(e)(2)(D)). The PREA amendment also
provides that for 2 years following the assurance sunset, a Governor who can certify that
the state has had audits for at least 90 percent of facilities under the operational control
of the Governor may request that the Attorney General allow submission of an
Updated June 2023

8
emergency assurance. Therefore, following the sunset of the assurance on December
16, 2022, Governors who meet the above criteria have two opportunities to submit an
emergency assurance. The first opportunity is for Audit Year 1 of Cycle 4 (August 20,
2022–August 19, 2023), which impacts FY 2023 DOJ grant funds. The deadline for this
certification or emergency assurance submission is October 16, 2023. The second and
final opportunity is for Audit Year 2 of Cycle 4 (August 20, 2023–August 19, 2024), which
impacts FY 2024 DOJ grant funds. The deadline for this certification or emergency
assurance submission is October 15, 2024.
A reduction in a JAG award to a state due to the PREA provision will not affect the
portion of the JAG award that is reserved for local jurisdictions.
For additional information concerning PREA implementation, send inquiries to the PREA
Management Office at: PREACompliance@usdoj.gov and/or review the PREA FAQs.
23. Is a state eligible for additional JAG funding based on its Prison Rape Elimination
Act (PREA) compliance status?
Some states are eligible for additional JAG funding based on PREA compliance status.
Each year, PREA gives state and territorial governors the option to submit to DOJ either
a certification that all confinement facilities under their operational control are in full
compliance with the National Standards to Prevent, Detect, and Respond to Prison Rape
(Standards) or to issue an assurance that they will use not less than 5 percent of certain
DOJ grant funds (including JAG) to come into full compliance with the Standards in the
future. See 34 U.S.C. § 30307. States and territories that do not submit a certification or
an assurance are subject to a 5 percent reduction in certain DOJ grant funds (including
JAG) that they would otherwise receive. The states and territories that have submitted
such a certification or assurance are eligible to receive a bonus amount on their annual
JAG award. The JAG bonus amounts are made up of JAG funds withheld from the
states and territories that did not submit a certification or an assurance and are
calculated based on a modified JAG formula.
24. What is required under the Death in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA)?
The Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-242) requires states to
report to the Attorney General information regarding the death of any person who is
detained, under arrest, or is in the process of being arrested, is en route to be
incarcerated, or is incarcerated at a municipal or county jail, state prison, state-run boot
camp prison, boot camp prison that is contracted by the state, any state or local contract
facility, or other local or state correctional facility (including any juvenile facility). State
Administering Agencies (SAAs) are responsible for collecting data on a quarterly basis
from local entities including local jails, law enforcement agencies, medical examiners,
and other state agencies. For additional information on DCRA requirements, see the
Death in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA) Reporting Requirement and the Death in
Custody Reporting Act (DCRA) State Plan FAQs.
A state that fails to comply may, at the discretion of the Attorney General, be subject to
not more than a 10 percent reduction of the funds that would otherwise be allocated for
that fiscal year to the state under the JAG program.
Updated June 2023

9
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
25. How do eligible entities apply for JAG funds?
DOJ funding opportunities follow a two-part application process. Detailed information on
how to apply can be found in the annual solicitation document, and in the OJP Grant
Application Resource Guide.
Applicants MUST have a valid Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number and an active
System of Award Management (SAM) registration to begin the application process in
Grants.gov. For additional information, see https://sam.gov/content/entity-registration
and Resources for Using the System for Award Management.
The JAG Program statute requires that local applicants be a unit of local government,
which, as described in the eligibility section, includes a town, township, village, parish,
city, county, borough, or other general-purpose political subdivision of a state, or it may
be a federally recognized Indian tribal government that performs law enforcement
functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior). A unit of local government
may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under
applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose
taxes; for example, in Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or
parish sheriff.
The legal name of the applicant must be associated with a UEI in SAM that is eligible to
apply to receive an award.
Eligible Scenarios:
• Example 1: City of X applies based on the formula allocation for City of X, and
their UEI number is registered in SAM with the legal name of City of X. This
applicant meets the eligibility requirements of JAG and is eligible to receive an
award.
• Example 2: City of X applies based on the formula allocation for City of X, and
their UEI number is registered in SAM with the legal name City of X, but their
SAM registration also includes a Doing Business As (DBA) for City of X Police
Department. The applicant meets the eligibility requirements of JAG and is
eligible to receive an award.
• Example 3: County of X applies based on the formula allocation for County of X,
and their UEI number is registered in SAM with the legal name County of X, but
their SAM registration also includes a Doing Business As (DBA) for County of X
Sheriff’s Office. The applicant meets the eligibility requirements of JAG and is
eligible to receive an award.
• Example 4: County of X Parish Sheriff’s Office applies based on the formula
allocation for County of X, their UEI is registered in SAM with the legal name for
County of X Parish Sherriff’s Office, and County of X Parish Sheriff’s Office is
established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a
Updated June 2023

10
budget and impose taxes. This applicant meets the eligibility requirements of
JAG and is eligible to receive an award.
Ineligible Scenarios:
• Example 1: City of X Police Department applies based on the formula allocation
for City of X and their UEI number is registered in SAM for City of X Police
Department. City of X Police Department is not a law enforcement district or judicial
enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to
independently establish a budget and impose taxes. This applicant does NOT meet
the eligibility requirements of JAG and is NOT eligible to receive an award.
• Example 2: County of X Sheriff’s Office applies based on the formula allocation
for County of X, their UEI is registered in SAM with the legal name for County of
X Sherriff’s Office, and County of X Sheriff’s Office is NOT established under
applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and
impose taxes. This applicant does NOT meet the eligibility requirements of
JAG and is NOT eligible to receive an award.
26. Who should be listed as the authorized representative on a JAG application?

The authorized representative must have the authority to enter the state, county,
municipality, or other eligible unit of local government into a legal contract with the federal
government. For Local JAG awards, this person is typically a county commissioner, mayor,
city manager, or other similarly designated official. A police chief or a sheriff may be
listed as the authorized representative if, and only if, the “Organizational Unit” line
in the application indicates the sheriff’s office or police department.
The authorized representative may not necessarily be the same person authorized
to sign the Chief Executive Certification.
27. What are the project and budget periods for the awards?
The project and budget periods for the awards vary depending on the type of award.
• For Local JAG awards:
Awards of at least $25,000 are 4 years in length. Extensions beyond this period
may be made on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of BJA and must be
requested via JustGrants no fewer than 30 calendar days prior to the grant end
date. See the DOJ Grants Financial Guide for guidance on project period
extensions.
Awards of less than $25,000 are 2 years in length. Extensions of up to 2 years

can be requested for these awards via JustGrants no fewer than 30 days calendar
prior to the grant end date and will be automatically granted upon request.
• For State JAG awards:

BJA makes awards for a 4-year period of performance.
An extension beyond this period may be made on a case-by-case basis at the
discretion of BJA and must be requested via JustGrants no fewer than 30
calendar days prior to the end of the period for performance. See the DOJ Grants
Financial Guide for guidance on project period extensions.
Updated June 2023

11
28. What are the governing body requirements related to a JAG application?
Pursuant to the JAG statute (at 34 U.S.C. § 10153(a)(2)), a JAG application must be
made available for review by the governing body of the applicant jurisdiction, or to an
organization designated by that governing body, at least 30 days prior to that application
being submitted to the awarding agency for funding.
To satisfy this requirement, BJA requires the submission of a properly completed

“Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive (CE) of the Applicant
Government” to attest to these facts. If the governing body review requirement has not
been completed at the time of application, a locality can still apply for JAG funding;
however, it will not be able to submit a properly completed form with its application. In
this event, the award will be made with a withholding special condition for the
“Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government”
form, which a grantee must submit to BJA post-award when all of the requirements
attested to in this form are met. The “Certifications and Assurances by the Chief
Executive of the Applicant Government” form associated with the most recent JAG
solicitations can be accessed the JAG web page at: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant (JAG) Program | Certifications & Assurances | Bureau of Justice
Assistance. Forms from prior JAG solicitations can be accessed at: Edward Byrne
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program | Archives | Bureau of Justice
Assistance.
29. What are the public comment requirements related to a JAG application?
Pursuant to the JAG statute (at 34 U.S.C. § 10153(a)(3)), a JAG application, prior to
being submitted to the awarding agency, must be made available for public comment by
citizens and neighborhood- and community-based organizations to the extent applicable
law or established procedures make such opportunity available.
To satisfy this requirement, BJA requires the submission of a properly completed

“Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government” to
attest to these facts. If the public comment requirement has not been completed at the
time of application, a locality can still apply for JAG funding; however, it will not be able
to submit a properly completed “Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of
the Applicant Government” form with its application. In this event, the award will be
made with a withholding special condition for the “Certifications and Assurances by the
Chief Executive of the Applicant Government” form, which a grantee must submit to BJA
post-award when all the requirements attested to in this form are met. The “Certifications
and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government” form associated
with the most recent JAG solicitations can be accessed the JAG web page at: Edward
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program | Certifications & Assurances |
Bureau of Justice Assistance. Forms from prior JAG solicitations can be accessed at:
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program | Archives | Bureau of
Justice Assistance.
Updated June 2023

12
30. Who may sign the “Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the
Applicant Government” as the chief executive for state or unit of local government
applicants?
The “Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government”
form must be signed by the jurisdiction’s chief executive. The chief executive is the
person who has the ultimate executive authority for the jurisdiction. Further, as set forth
in the certification itself, the chief executive is the person that has the authority to make
representations on behalf of the unit of local government. Typically, the chief executive is
the highest elected official of the jurisdiction (e.g., governor, mayor, or county board
chair).
This chief executive may not delegate signature authority to another person under
any circumstances.
31. Can multiple federal grant awards be used to supplement, not duplicate, the same
project?
Each applicant is required to disclose whether it has (or is proposed as a subrecipient
under) any pending applications for federally funded grants or cooperative agreements
that (1) include requests for funding to support the same project being proposed in the
application under this solicitation and (2) would cover identical cost items outlined in the
budget submitted to OJP as part of the application under this solicitation. The applicant
is required to disclose applications made directly to federal awarding agencies and also
applications for subawards of federal funds (e.g., applications to state agencies that will
subaward (subgrant) federal funds).
Leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement

comprehensive programs or projects is encouraged and is not seen as inappropriate
duplication.
32. What does the Statewide Strategic Plan requirement under State JAG entail, and is
technical assistance available?
States must submit a comprehensive statewide strategic plan with their applications.
Additionally, in any year in which the statewide strategic plan is not fully updated, states
must submit a brief annual report with their applications.
The statewide strategic plan, which must be updated at least every 5 years, should:
• Be designed in consultation with local governments and representatives of all
segments of the criminal justice system—including judges, prosecutors, law
enforcement personnel, and corrections personnel—and providers of indigent
defense services, victim services, juvenile justice delinquency prevention
programs, community corrections, and reentry services.
• Include details on how grants will be used to improve the administration of the
criminal justice system.
• Include a description of how the state will allocate funding within and among
each of the JAG Program areas.
• Describe the process used by the state for gathering data and developing and
Updated June 2023

13
using evidence-based and evidence-gathering approaches in support of funding
decisions.
• Describe the barriers at the state and local levels for accessing data and
implementing evidence-based approaches to preventing and reducing crime and
recidivism.
The annual report (required in the years between full statewide strategic plan updates),
intended to provide a summary update of program implementation efforts as detailed in
the statewide strategic plan, should:
• Discuss changing circumstances in the state, if any, since the strategic plan was
adopted.
• Describe how the state plans to adjust funding within and among each of the
JAG program areas.
• Provide an ongoing assessment of need.
• Discuss the accomplishment of the goals identified in the strategic plan.
• Reflect how the plan influenced funding decisions in the previous year.
States that submit incomplete or minimal statewide strategic plans with their applications
will be recommended by BJA to receive training and technical assistance (TTA). If no
plan is attached, an annual report is missing, or a submitted strategic plan or annual
report clearly fails to discuss the required elements described above, then TTA will be
required, and funds may be withheld until a minimally sufficient strategic plan or annual
report is submitted.
TTA is available at no cost through a BJA cooperative agreement to assist states with
the development of their strategic planning processes and plans. To help ensure that
states consider the impact of JAG funding decisions across the entire criminal justice
system, BJA strongly encourages each state to involve all criminal justice system
stakeholders in the strategic planning process. The strategic planning process should
reflect input from all segments of the criminal justice system—including local
governments, judges, prosecutors, law enforcement, and corrections personnel—and
providers of indigent defense services, victim services, juvenile justice and delinquency
prevention programs, parole and probation services, and reentry services. For more
information, please see: https://www.ncja.org/strategic-planning.
33. What does the Death in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA) State Implementation Plan
under State JAG entail, and is technical assistance available?
States must submit a DCRA state implementation plan with their applications, which
includes its plan for collecting and reporting DCRA Program data. The required elements
in the DCRA state implementation plan can be found at: DCRA State Plan
Implementation Guidance. Additionally, in any year in which the DCRA state
implementation plan is not updated, states must submit a brief annual DCRA
implementation update with their applications.
States that submit incomplete or minimal DCRA state implementation plans with their
applications will be recommended by BJA for TTA. If no DCRA state implementation
Updated June 2023

14
plan is attached, an annual DCRA implementation update report is missing, or a
submitted DCRA state implementation plan or annual DCRA implementation update
clearly fails to discuss the required elements in the DCRA State Plan Implementation
Guidance, then TTA will be required, and funds may be withheld until a minimally
sufficient DCRA state implementation plan or annual DCRA implementation update is
submitted. For more information, please see https://bja.ojp.gov/program/dcra/training-
and-technical-assistance.
DISPARATE INFORMATION
34. What does it mean when two or more units of local government are listed under
the column “Joint Application (Disparate) Award Amount” in the JAG allocation
tables?
In some cases, as defined by the legislation, a disparity may exist between the funding
eligibility of a county and its associated municipalities. Three different types of disparities
may exist:
• The first type is a zero-county disparity. This situation exists when one or more
municipalities within a county are eligible for a direct award but the county is not, yet
the county is responsible for providing criminal justice services (such as prosecution
and incarceration) for the municipality. In this case, the county is entitled to part of
the municipality’s award because it shares the cost of criminal justice operations,
although it may not report crime data to the FBI. This is the most common type of
disparity.
• A second type of disparity exists when both a county and a municipality within that
county qualify for a direct award, but the award amount for the municipality exceeds
150 percent of the county’s award amount.
• The third type of disparity occurs when a county and multiple municipalities within
that county are all eligible for direct awards, but the sum of the awards for the
individual municipalities exceeds 400 percent of the county’s award amount.
35. How is it determined which unit of local government will be the fiscal agent
responsible for applying for the disparate funds?
When beginning the JAG application process, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicant or fiscal agent for joint funds
must be completed and signed by the “Authorized Representative” for each participating
jurisdiction. The signed MOU should be attached to the application. For a sample MOU,
go to: JAG SAMPLE MOU.
36. How does a fiscal agent determine allocation amounts for jurisdictions identified
as disparate?
Jurisdictions certified as disparate must identify a fiscal agent that will submit a joint
application for the aggregate eligible allocation on behalf of all the disparate
municipalities. The joint application must determine and specify the award distribution to
each unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. Please
note that the amounts listed within the annual JAG allocations chart are calculated
amounts based on the formula and how much each jurisdiction would be eligible for if no
Updated June 2023

15
disparity was identified; however, jurisdictions within the disparate situation are to
determine and agree upon the award amount for each listed jurisdiction. There is no
requirement to use the amounts listed for each disparate jurisdiction on the allocations
chart.
37. What Is the process if one or more disparate jurisdictions do not agree to sign an
MOU and intend to decline funding?
If a disparate unit of local government does not agree to sign an MOU (even an MOU
that states that the disparate unit of local government will be receiving $0 as part of the
award), BJA will accept an official letter of declination in lieu of the disparate unit of local
government’s signature on the MOU. This official letter of declination must clearly state
that the unit of local government understands that they will not be receiving funds under
the subject award and must be signed by the highest ranking official for the unit of local
government.
38. When there is a group of disparate jurisdictions applying for a JAG award, do the
“Certifications and Assurances by Chief Executive of Applicant” apply to each
disparate jurisdiction or just the fiscal agent?
The “Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government”
must be submitted by the applicant/fiscal agent to OJP. The subrecipients in the
disparate group are not required to submit such a certification by their chief executive,
although each unit of local government must abide by state/local policies and
procedures regarding governing body review and public comment opportunity.
39. Does the disclosure of duplication in cost items (formerly the disclosure of
pending applications) applications requirement apply to each disparate
jurisdiction or just the unit of local government that is the fiscal agent?
For disparate jurisdictions, the disclosure of duplication in cost items should cover all
projects and activities proposed to be funded under the award, whether by the
applicant/fiscal agent or by other jurisdictions in the disparate. The fiscal agent will
submit the Disclosure of Pending Applications (now called Applicant Disclosure of
Duplication in Cost Items) in JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide
| Office of Justice Programs for more information.
USE OF FUNDS
40. What can JAG funds be used for?
In general, JAG funds may be used to provide additional personnel, equipment,
supplies, contractual support, training, technical assistance, and information systems for
criminal justice, or civil proceedings, including for any one or more of the following nine
JAG Program areas, per the JAG statute:
(A) Law enforcement programs.
(B) Prosecution and court programs.
(C) Prevention and education programs.
(D) Corrections and community corrections programs.
Updated June 2023

16
(E) Drug treatment and enforcement programs.
(F) Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs.
(G) Crime victim and witness programs (other than compensation)
(H) Mental health programs and related law enforcement and corrections
programs, including behavioral programs and crisis intervention teams.
(I) Implementation of state crisis intervention court proceedings and related
programs or initiatives, including but not limited to:
(i) Mental health courts
(ii) Drug courts
(iii) Veterans courts
(iv) Extreme risk protection order programs
In connection with all of the above purposes, it should be noted that the statute defines
“criminal justice” as “activities pertaining to crime prevention, control, or reduction, or the
enforcement of the criminal law, including, but not limited to, police efforts to prevent,
control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals, including juveniles; activities of courts
having criminal jurisdiction, and related agencies (including but not limited to
prosecutorial and defender services, juvenile delinquency agencies, and pretrial service
or release agencies); activities of corrections, probation, or parole authorities and related
agencies assisting in the rehabilitation, supervision, and care of criminal offenders; and
programs relating to the prevention, control, or reduction of narcotic addiction and
juvenile delinquency.”
41. Does BJA have any recommendations for how recipients should use JAG funds?
BJA recognizes that many state and local justice systems currently face challenging
fiscal environments and an important, cost-effective way to relieve those pressures is to
share or leverage resources through cooperation among federal, state, and local law
enforcement. Each year, BJA includes key areas of priority in the JAG solicitation and
encourages recipients of JAG funds to consider coordination with federal law
enforcement agencies and other stakeholders, including communities most impacted by
crime and violence, in addressing these challenges identified in the key priority areas. In
FY 2023, the areas of emphasis advancing justice system reform efforts, advancing
racial equity and support for underserved communities, preventing and combating hate
crimes, crime and violence reduction strategies, and community-based violence
intervention (CVI) approaches. Detailed information on the areas of emphasis can be
found in the current year JAG solicitations posted on the JAG web page.
42. What is the difference between the JAG areas of emphasis and JAG program
areas?
The nine JAG Program areas are statutory and do not vary year to year absent changes
to the JAG legislation. Any JAG-funded projects must have a nexus to one or more of
the statutory JAG Program areas. The JAG areas of emphasis are updated annually by
BJA and represent current BJA, Administration, Departmental, and/or other priorities.
BJA encourages grantees to fund JAG projects that fall within one of more of these
areas of emphasis; however, unlike the nine JAG Program areas, recipients are not
required to utilize funds for projects that fall within the areas of emphasis.
Updated June 2023

17
43. What are some other examples of other potential uses of JAG funding?
JAG funds may also be used to:
• Support reentry projects with the goal of improving outcomes for incarcerated
individuals returning to the community from prison or jail.
• Support projects related to preventing, detecting, seizing, and/or stopping the
presence and use of contraband cellphones within correctional facilities. This
includes the purchasing of managed access systems and other mitigation
technologies (as permitted by applicable law).
• Purchase fentanyl and methamphetamine detection equipment, including
handheld instruments and training for law enforcement safety, as well as opioid
reversal agents.
• Purchase drug-detection canines to combat the rise of drug trafficking, including
that of methamphetamines.
• Support efforts to seal and expunge criminal history information in accordance
with state laws and policies.
• Support efforts to attract and retain an all-inclusive, diverse, expert, and
accountable law enforcement workforce, with a focus on gender and racial
diversity.
• Support virtual reality de-escalation training.
• Purchase humane remote restraint devices that enable law enforcement to
restrain an uncooperative subject without inflicting pain.
• Purchase gunfire detection technology.
• Promote data sharing and sex offender monitoring.
Additionally, JAG funds may be used for any purpose indicated here: Purposes for
Which Funds Awarded under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants
(JAG) Program May Be Used.
44. Can JAG funds be used by state and local governments to increase patrols and
deployments that bolster the security of at-risk nonprofit organizations?
JAG funds can be used by state and local governments for crime prevention efforts to
increase patrols and deployments that bolster the security of at-risk nonprofit
organizations including synagogues, churches, mosques, and other places of worship.
45. Can JAG funding be used to support election security projects?

The broad criminal justice purposes supported by the JAG program permit JAG funds to
be used to deter, detect, and protect against threats of violence against election workers,
administrators, officials, and others associated with the electoral process.
Please note that JAG funds cannot be used to support any security enhancements or
any equipment to any nongovernmental entity that is not engaged in criminal justice or
public safety.
46. Is the purchase of GPS trackers where there is a significant vulnerable population
a permissible use of JAG funds?
The purchase of GPS trackers is allowable if the purchase is reasonably related to an
Updated June 2023

18
allowable JAG programmatic purpose. Refer here for more information:
TrackingDeviceFunding.pdf (ojp.gov).
47. Would the costs for indigent defense under the prosecution and court program
area be considered allowable under the JAG program?
Grantees may use JAG funds for a wide range of state, local, and/or tribal prosecution
and court programs, including indigent defense.
48. Are there any restrictions on the use of JAG funds for DNA testing?
If JAG program funds will be used for DNA testing of evidentiary materials, the resulting
DNA profiles must be eligible for upload to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS, the
national DNA database operated by the FBI) by a government DNA lab with access to
CODIS (with the exception of forensic genetic genealogy). No profiles generated with
JAG funding may be entered into any other nongovernmental DNA database without prior
express written approval from BJA (with the exception of forensic genetic genealogy).
In addition, funds may not be used for the purchase of DNA equipment and supplies
when the resulting DNA profiles from such technology are not acceptable for entry into
CODIS.
Award recipients utilizing funds for forensic genealogy testing must adhere to the United
States Department of Justice Interim Policy: Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA
Analysis and Searching.
Finally, in accordance with Section IX, grantees utilizing funds for this purpose must
collect and report the following metrics to BJA:
1. The type of crime investigated.
2. Whether forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis (FGG)/forensic genetic
genealogical DNA analysis and searching (FGGS) was conducted on a forensic
sample or a reference sample.
3. The type of forensic sample subjected to FGG and a description of the total
amount, condition, and concentration of that sample (e.g., single source, mixed
profile, degradation status, etc.).
4. Whether FGG analysis resulted in a searchable profile.
5. The identity of the vendor laboratory used to conduct FGG and the genetic
genealogy service(s) used to search the FGG profile.
6. Whether the investigation resulted in an arrest that was based, in part, on the use
of FGGS.
7. The total amount of federal funding used to conduct FGG/FGGS in each case.
49. Can JAG funds be used to purchase Rapid DNA instruments?

JAG funds may be used to support Rapid DNA projects that meet the requirements for
participation in Rapid DNA, including those involving the purchase of Rapid DNA
instruments that have been approved for use by the FBI for use in the booking environment
(see the National Rapid DNA Booking Operational Procedures Manual). JAG funds may
not be used for Rapid DNA testing of evidentiary material (e.g., crime scene
samples, sexual assault kits) because the FBI has not authorized results of this
Updated June 2023

19
testing for upload to CODIS. Rapid DNA instruments, or Rapid DNA analysis, is a term
used to describe the fully automated (hands-free) process of developing a DNA profile from
a reference sample mouth swab in 1–2 hours without the need of a DNA laboratory and
without any human intervention. The overall goal of the Rapid DNA Initiative is
to immediately enroll qualifying arrestees in CODIS and search unsolved crimes of
special concern in near real time during the booking process.
Below is an abbreviated list of prerequisites for federal, state, and local booking
agencies to participate in Rapid DNA:
• The state must have implemented an arrestee DNA collection law that authorizes
DNA sample collection from a person arrested for a specified offense at the time
of arrest and for which there are no additional requirements (i.e., determination of
probable cause) for the analysis of that arrestee DNA sample. Federal booking
agencies already meet this prerequisite.
• Electronic Fingerprint (Live Scan) integration during the booking process for
obtaining State Identification Numbers (SID), or Universal Control Number for
federal booking agencies, from the State Identification Bureau (FBI for federal) in
near real time.
• The booking agency must have network connectivity with the State Identification
Bureau/CJIS Systems Agency.
• The booking agency and/or state must technically integrate Rapid DNA within
their automated fingerprint process in a way that must ensure only qualifying
arrestees are processed.
It will be critical for booking agencies to work with their state CODIS agency to ensure all
requirements are met for participation in Rapid DNA (see National Rapid DNA Booking
Operational Procedures Manual). BJA encourages those states with arrestee DNA
collection laws that meet the prerequisites above to consider using JAG funds to
implement Rapid DNA technology (or the defined prerequisites above, such as live scan
integration) in booking stations within their states.
50. Is there a cap on the amount of overtime pay for law enforcement officers?
No. However, federal regulations do require that personnel compensation always be
reasonable considering the services rendered.
51. What considerations must be taken into account for projects involving
technological devices, artificial intelligence, and other data-driven solutions?
Technological devices, artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, and other data-driven
solutions (“Technological Enhancements”) are increasingly used to augment crime-
reduction strategies and efforts. Care must be taken to assess and address any potential
harm that could be activated by these solutions to ensure privacy, civil rights, and civil
liberties are protected. Recipients utilizing grant funds to support technological
enhancements directly should ensure those projects address the tenants of digital trust
to include:
• How the technology will be carefully implemented through training of personnel
and the setting and enforcement of policies governing its use to ensure that it
Updated June 2023

20
contributes to positive outcomes for public safety the community, and/or the
criminal justice system or in civil proceedings.
• How the recipient will safeguard privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties throughout
the duration of the project period.
52. What is required to use JAG funding for Facial Recognition Technology (FRT)
projects?
In for JAG funds to be used for Facial Recognition Technology (FRT), the recipient must
have policies and procedures in place to ensure that the FRT will be used in an
appropriate and responsible manner that promotes public safety; and protects privacy,
civil rights, and civil liberties; and complies with all applicable provisions of the U.S.
Constitution, including the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable
searches and seizures, the first amendment’s freedom of association and speech, and
other laws and regulations. Recipients utilizing funds for FRT must make such policies
and procedures available to DOJ upon request.
53. Is the purchase of opioid overdose reversal agents, or the use of JAG funds to
support medication-assisted treatment for substance use, permissible under
JAG?
Medication-assisted treatments, such as the purchase of opioid overdose reversal
agents (e.g., naloxone), which are approved by the Food and Drug Administration, may
be purchased with JAG funds. However, as always, any JAG Program expenditure must
fall under at least one of the statutory JAG Program areas. For more information about
law enforcement use of these types of drugs, please refer to the Naloxone Toolkit
available at: Naloxone Background | Working with BJA NTTAC.
54. Can JAG funds be used to purchase canines, including those used for drug
detection?
JAG funds may be used to purchase canines and related equipment/supplies to support
any project or purpose with a criminal justice nexus, including drug detection, and/or for
civil proceedings.
55. Can JAG funds be used to purchase firearms and ammunition, such as duty
weapons and associated ammunition?
JAG funds may be used to purchase firearms and ammunition, including duty weapons
and associated ammunition. However, firearms and ammunition of .50 or greater caliber
and firearm silencers are strictly prohibited. In addition, specialized firearms and
ammunition under .50 caliber, including launchers specifically designed and built to
launch less lethal projectiles, are controlled and require express written approval, post-
award, before funds can be obligated, expended, or drawn down for the purchase or
transfer of such equipment. See the JAG Prohibited and Controlled Equipment
Guidance for additional information and instructions.
56. May a jurisdiction use JAG funds to purchase firearms and drugs for an
undercover operation?
JAG funds may be used as confidential funds for the purchase of services (buy money),
evidence (narcotics, firearms, stolen property, etc.), and specific information (informant
Updated June 2023

21
money) for undercover purposes in accordance with 34 U.S.C 10152(d). Prior to the
expenditure of any confidential funds, the recipient and any subrecipients must agree to
sign a certification indicating that they have read, understood, and agree to abide by all of
the conditions pertaining to confidential fund expenditures as set forth in the DOJ Grants
Financial Guide.
57. Would costs related to the Fugitive Safe Surrender (FSS) and Countering Violent
Extremism (CVE) Programs be allowable expenses with JAG funds?
Through its nine program areas, JAG funding may be used to support a broad range of
criminal justice activities, projects, and programs. Activities under programs such as FSS
and CVE would be allowable as long as they are specifically tied to a JAG Program area
and not otherwise prohibited under JAG. To verify that activities are not prohibited under
JAG, see “Are there any limitations on the use of JAG funds, including expenditures that
are specifically prohibited or controlled?” JAG funds expended under these programs
may also be used for civil proceedings.
58. What are the requirements for body armor vests purchased with JAG funds?
Body armor vests purchased with JAG funds must have been tested through the National
Institute of Justice (NIJ) Compliance Testing Program (CTP), and found to comply with
the most current NIJ body armor standards, appear on the NIJ Compliant Products List
as of the date the body armor was ordered, be uniquely fitted, and be made in the United
States. In addition, recipients using JAG funds for body armor vests must have a written
mandatory wear policy. This policy must be in place for at least all uniformed officers
before any current year awards can be used by the jurisdiction for body armor vests, and
the jurisdiction must provide a signed Body Armor Mandatory Wear Policy Certification to
BJA. This certification can be signed by the grantee’s authorized representative or a
person officially delegated/authorized to sign on their behalf.
There are no requirements regarding the nature of the mandatory policy other than it
specify when mandatory wear is required for uniformed officers on duty. Additional
guidance regarding the mandatory wear requirement can be found in the BVP FAQs and
the BVP Mandatory Wear FAQs.
Law enforcement agency administrators and jurisdiction CEOs can obtain a copy of the
Body Armor Model Policy and Issues Paper (developed by the International Association
of Chiefs of Police) by contacting the BVP Help Desk at 1–877–758–3787 or by email at
vests@usdoj.gov.
If the recipient proposes to change project activities to use JAG funds to purchase body
armor after the award is accepted, the recipient must submit the signed certification to BJA
at that time.
Note: A Body Armor Mandatory Wear Policy Certification is also required for the
purchase of vest carriers and body armor plates.
Updated June 2023

22
59. Can JAG funds be used to satisfy the 50 percent match requirement under the
Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Program?
No. JAG funds may not be used as any part of the 50 percent match required by the BVP
Program. Absent specific federal statutory authority to do so, JAG award funds may not
be used as “match” for the purposes of other federal awards. The JAG Program does not
require a match.
For additional cost sharing and match information, see the DOJ Grants Financial Guide.
60. Can the receipt of JAG funds impact a jurisdiction’s eligibility under the Patrick
Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Program?
Pursuant to the BVP Program statute, receipt of JAG funding by a unit of local
government may impact its eligibility for funding under the Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest
Partnership (BVP) Program in the same fiscal year, unless it is a qualifying unit of local
government with fewer than 100,000 residents. For more information on the BVP
Program, including eligibility and application, refer to the BVP web page and the BVP
FAQs.
61. Does OJP support a policy on denying federal benefits to an officer or to an

officer’s survivors if the officer is injured and/or killed in the line of duty and was
NOT wearing a vest as required by a jurisdiction’s policy?
No blanket policy or automatic disqualification shall be implemented regarding OJP’s
requirement for policy on the use of body armor and its effects on federal death, disability,
or educational benefits through the Public Safety Officers' Benefits (PSOB) Program.
62. May a recipient use JAG funds to purchase body armor vests for firefighters or
emergency medical service (EMS) personnel?
JAG funds can be used for these purchases if a criminal justice purpose is present and
documented.
63. Are the purchases of body-worn cameras, data storage, and other related costs
allowable expenses under the JAG program?
Body-worn cameras, data storage, and other related costs are allowable under JAG if the
items fall within one of the nine program areas under JAG. Note that apart from the JAG
Program, BJA provides funds under the Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation
Program (BWC Program). Interested units of local government may wish to refer to the
Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) | Overview | Bureau of Justice Assistance for more
information. A jurisdiction that proposes to use JAG award funds to purchase BWC
equipment or to implement or enhance BWC programs must provide to OJP a
certification(s) that each jurisdiction’s law enforcement agency receiving the equipment or
implementing the program has policies and procedures in place related to BWC
equipment usage, data storage and access, privacy considerations, and training. The
certification form related to BWC policies and procedures can be found at: Edward Byrne
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program – Body-Worn Camera (BWC) Policy
Certification.
This certification can be signed by the grantee’s authorized representative or a person
Updated June 2023

23
officially delegated/authorized to sign on their behalf. JAG funds may not be used as any
part of the 50 percent match required by the BWC Program.
For additional cost sharing and match information, see the DOJ Grants Financial Guide.
64. What are the requirements for using JAG funds to purchase body-worn cameras
(BWCs)?
A jurisdiction that proposes to use the current year’s funding award to purchase BWC
equipment, or to implement or enhance BWC programs, must provide to OJP
certification(s) that the recipient (or, if applicable, that any subrecipient that will receive
funds from the recipient for BWC purposes) has policies and procedures in place related
to BWC equipment usage, data storage and access, privacy considerations, and
training. A recipient that proposes to use JAG funds for BWC-related expenses will have
funds withheld until the required certification is submitted and approved by OJP. The
BJA BWC Toolkit provides model BWC policies and best practices to assist
departments in implementing BWC programs.
65. Can JAG funds be used for membership dues?

Membership dues are allowable under JAG if the organizational membership is
reasonably related to an allowable JAG programmatic purpose. Note: Membership fees
to organizations whose primary activity is lobbying is unallowable. See 2 C.F.R.
200.454(e) and the DOJ Grants Financial Guide.
66. Can JAG funds be used for administrative expenses?

A state or unit of local government may use up to 10 percent of a JAG award, including
up to 10 percent of any earned interest, for costs associated with administering the
award. Administrative costs (when used) must be tracked separately; a recipient must
report in separate Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) those expenditures that
specifically relate to each JAG award during any particular reporting period.
67. Are there any requirements for using JAG funds for extreme risk protection order
programs?
As required by 34 USC §10152 (a)(1)(I)(iv), extreme risk protection orders programs
must include, at a minimum:
a. Pre-deprivation and post-deprivation due process rights that prevent any violation
or infringement of the U.S. Constitution, including but not limited to the Bill of
Rights and the substantive or procedural due process rights guaranteed under
the 5th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as applied to the states
and as interpreted by state courts and U.S. courts (including the Supreme Court
of the United States). Such programs must include, at the appropriate phase, to
prevent any violation of constitutional rights, and, at minimum notice, the right to
an in-person hearing, an unbiased adjudicator, the right to know opposing
evidence, the right to present evidence, and the right to confront adverse
witnesses.
b. The right to be represented by counsel at no expense to the government.
c. Pre-deprivation and post-deprivation heightened evidentiary standards and proof,
Updated June 2023

24
which mean not less than the protections afforded to a similarly situated litigant in
federal court or promulgated by the state’s evidentiary body and sufficient to
ensure the full protections of the U.S. Constitution, including but not limited to the
Bill of Rights and the substantive and procedural due process rights guaranteed
under the 5th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as applied to the
states and as interpreted by state courts and U.S. courts (including the Supreme
Court of the United States). The heightened evidentiary standards and proof
under such programs must, at all appropriate phases, prevent any violation of
any constitutional right, and, at minimum, prevent reliance upon evidence that is
unsworn or unaffirmed, irrelevant, based on inadmissible hearsay, unreliable,
vague, speculative, and lacking a foundation.
d. Penalties for abuse of the program.
68. What are the training requirements for task forces supported in whole or in part by
JAG funds?
When a task force is supported in whole or in part by BJA funding, each current member
of a law enforcement task force funded with these funds who is a task force commander,
agency executive, task force officer, or other task force member of equivalent rank is
required to complete the following online eLearning modules: Executive Leadership,
Task Force Commander Leadership and Management, Safeguarding P/CRCL in Task
Force Operations, and Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies. This training
must be completed within 120 days of award acceptance. Additionally, all future task
force members are required to complete this training once during the life of this award or
once every 4 years if multiple awards include this requirement. The training is provided
free of charge online through BJA's Center for Task Force Integrity and Leadership
(Center for Task Force Training Online Training Portal). This training addresses task
force effectiveness as well as other key issues, including privacy and civil liberties/rights,
task force performance measurement, personnel selection, and task force oversight and
accountability. When BJA funding supports a task force, the grant recipient should
compile and maintain a task force personnel roster, along with course completion
certificates. This information may be requested by BJA post-award to ensure compliance.
Additional information is available regarding this required training and access methods
via BJA's website and the Center for Task Force Integrity and Leadership (Center for
Task Force Training Online Training Portal).
69. Can indirect costs be charged to an award? Are these costs related to
administrative expenses capped at 10 percent?
Up to 10 percent of a JAG award, including up to 10 percent of any earned interest, may
be used for costs associated with administering the award. The 10 percent statutory cap
on administrative costs also includes indirect costs. For additional information on indirect
costs, please see the DOJ Grants Financial Guide.
70. Can JAG funds be used for construction and/or major renovation projects?
Construction and/or major renovation projects for penal or correctional institutions is
allowable JAG. For guidance on construction and/or major renovation projects not
related to penal or correctional institutions, see “Are there any limitations on the use of
Updated June 2023

25
JAG funds, including expenditures that are specifically prohibited or controlled?”
Note: Any project that involves construction or major renovation will be subject to
environmental analysis requirements pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Additional information on NEPA can be found at National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Guidance | Bureau of Justice Assistance.
71. Are there any limitations on the use of JAG funds, including expenditures that are
specifically prohibited or controlled?
The JAG statute, at 34 U.S.C. § 10152(d), specifically identifies a list of prohibited items.
In addition, consistent with Executive Order 14074 of May 25, 2022, “Advancing
Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices To Enhance Public Trust
and Public Safety,” the use of OJP grant funds for the purchase or transfer certain
equipment has been designated as prohibited or controlled starting with FY 2023 OJP
grant funds. Details and associated procedures for requesting prior approval (waiver),
where applicable, can be found in the JAG Prohibited and Controlled Equipment
Guidance.
Lists of prohibited items, details, and associated procedures for requesting prior approval
(waiver), where applicable, for JAG awards made prior to FY 2023 can be found at
https://bja.ojp.gov/doc/jag-controlled-purchase-list-pre-2023.pdf.
72. Do the limitations on the JAG funds in the JAG Prohibited and Controlled
Expenditures Guidance also apply vehicle leases and rentals?
The limitations on the use of JAG funds found in the JAG Prohibited and Controlled
Equipment Guidance applies to vehicle leases and rentals.
73. What is supplanting and do supplanting prohibitions apply to JAG funding?

Supplanting is to deliberately reduce state or local funds because of the existence of
federal funds. For example, when state funds are appropriated for a stated purpose and
federal funds are awarded for that same purpose, the state replaces its state funds with
federal funds, thereby reducing the total amount available for the stated purpose. JAG
funds may not be used to supplant state or local funds but must be used to increase the
amounts of such funds that would, in the absence of federal funds, be made available for
criminal justice activities or civil proceedings. For additional information, see the DOJ
Grants Financial Guide.
Although supplanting is prohibited, the leveraging of federal funding is encouraged.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
74. What are the standard programmatic and financial reporting requirements once a
JAG grant is awarded?
State and local recipients under the JAG Program are required to submit the following
reports and data:
Updated June 2023

26
• Quarterly Federal Financial Reports (and one final Federal Financial Report after
all funds have been obligated and expended) through OJP’s JustGrants System.
• Quarterly performance measurement reports (once all funds have been obligated
and expended, that report may be marked final) through the BJA Performance
Measurement Tool.
• Semi-annual progress reports (once all funds have been obligated and
expended, that report may be marked final) through OJP’s JustGrants System for
all JAG recipients except for FY 2020 and forward Category 1 Local JAG
awards less than $25,000.
• For FY 2020 and forward Category 1 Local JAG awards Only: An annual
progress report and final progress report through OJP’s JustGrants. If all project
activity has concluded at the time the first annual progress report is submitted,
that report may be marked final.
*Please note that future awards and fund drawdowns may be withheld if reports
are delinquent. (In appropriate cases, OJP may require additional reports.)
75. When are the first performance measurement, progress, and financial reports due
for JAG?
The first performance measurement (submitted through the BJA Performance
Measurement Tool) and progress and financial reports (submitted through OJP’s
JustGrants System) are due once the award has been accepted in JustGrants. The
reporting period for both coincides with the project start date, which is backdated to the
beginning of the fiscal year. For example, for an FY23 award, the initial reporting period
will start on October 1, 2022.
Please note that all performance reports (completed quarterly in the Performance
Measurement Tool (PMT) and uploaded semi-annually in JustGrants) and quarterly
financial reports must be submitted back to the start date of the award, which is always
October 1 of the fiscal year. This is due to obligations being allowable retroactively back
to the award start date under JAG. If no activity occurred prior to award acceptance,
submitted quarterly financial reports for the periods prior should simply show no activity.
76. What reports beyond standard programmatic and financial reports may be
required once a JAG grant is awarded?
• If applicable, an annual audit report in accordance with the Part 200 Uniform
Requirements or specific award conditions.
• Awards that exceed $500,000 will include an additional condition that, under specific
circumstances, will require the recipient to report to Federal Awardee Performance
and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) information on civil, criminal, and
administrative proceedings connected with (or connected to the performance of)
either the OJP award or any other grant, cooperative agreement, or procurement
contract from the federal government. Additional information on this reporting
requirement appears in the text of the award condition posted on the OJP website at:
Award Condition: Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters (including Recipient
Reporting to FAPIIS) | Office of Justice Programs.
Updated June 2023

27
• Consistent with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of
2006, all direct award recipients will be required to report award information on any
first-tier subawards totaling $30,000 or more and, in certain circumstances, to report
information on the names and total compensation of the five most highly
compensated executives of the recipient and first-tier subrecipients. The details of
recipient obligations, which derive from the FFATA, are posted on the OJP website at:
Award Condition: Reporting Subawards and Executive Compensation (Updated as of
September 2016).
77. What is the Death in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA) reporting requirement?
The Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2013 (DCRA; Pub. L. No. 113-242) provides in
part that “the State shall report to the Attorney General . . . information regarding the
death of any person who is detained, under arrest, or is in the process of being arrested,
is en route to be incarcerated, or is incarcerated at a municipal or county jail, state
prison, state-run boot camp prison, boot camp prison that is contracted out by the state,
any state or local contract facility, or other local or state correctional facility (including
any juvenile facility).”
State Administering Agencies (SAAs) are responsible for collecting data on a quarterly
basis from local entities including local jails, law enforcement agencies, medical
examiners, and other state agencies. SAAs are responsible for compiling and
aggregating the data for submission to BJA.
Each quarter, states should either (1) report all deaths in custody that occurred in their
jurisdictions during the corresponding quarter and provide basic information about the
circumstances of those deaths or (2) affirm that no deaths in custody occurred in their
jurisdictions during the reporting period. States must answer questions related to deaths
in custody in BJA’s Performance Measurement Tool (PMT) and submit the information
by the reporting deadline. The reporting deadline is the last day of the month following
the close of the quarter (January, April, July, October).
For each death in custody, states must enter the following information into the PMT:
• The decedent’s name, date of birth, gender, race, and ethnicity
• The date, time, and location of the death
• The law enforcement or correctional agency involved
• Manner of death
• Description of the circumstances leading to the death
States must sufficiently answer all questions related to deaths in custody before they can
submit the information in the PMT. If a state does not have sufficient information to
complete certain data elements, they may enter “unknown” data values (when allowed in
the PMT). For cases that remain under investigation, the “manner of death” should be
reported as “unavailable, investigation pending,” and the state should specify when it
anticipates obtaining the information. Once the information is available, states will need
to have the PMT Helpdesk unlock their reports to update them. If the information is not
updated, BJA will follow up with states in subsequent reporting periods to update
Updated June 2023

28
previous entries.
For additional information on DCRA reporting requirements, please reference the DCRA
Webpage, BJA DCRA Factsheet, BJA DCRA TTA Webpage and the supplementary
FAQ document on BJA’s Performance Measurement web page.
Units of local government are strongly encouraged to cooperate with DCRA data
collection efforts within their state.
AWARD ADMINISTRATION
78. How will prospective recipients be notified when an award is made?
An email notification will also be sent to the Application Submitter, the Authorized
Representative, and the Entity Administrator to sign and accept their award and discuss
how to enroll in Automated Standard Application for payments (ASAP). Prior to
accepting an award, the Entity Administrator must assign a Financial Manager, a Grant
Award Administrator, and an Authorized Representative for each award. When the
Authorized Representative logs into their JustGrants account, they can view accepted
awards and awards that need to be accepted in their worklist if the award has been
assigned to them, or they can view all applications under the Applications menu. For
more information on award acceptance, please refer to the Grantee Acceptance Job Aid
Reference Guide.
79. May a jurisdiction obligate or expend its own funds prior to receipt of a JAG
award?
The period of performance for JAG awards typically begins with each federal fiscal year,
even though recipients may not apply for or receive the JAG award until several months
later.
JAG recipients may not obligate federal award funds before validly accepting the JAG
award. However, as of the first day of the period of performance for the award (typically
October 1 of the relevant federal fiscal year), the recipient may choose to incur project
costs using nonfederal funds. Any project costs incurred before valid acceptance of the
JAG award are incurred at the recipient’s risk until, at a minimum, (1) the recipient
makes a valid acceptance of the award and (2) all applicable withholding conditions are
removed by BJA via a Grant Award Modification (GAM).
If and when the recipient makes a valid acceptance of the award and OJP removes each
applicable withholding condition through a GAM, the recipient will be able to obligate
JAG award funds to reimburse itself for project costs incurred earlier during the period of
performance (such as project costs incurred prior to award acceptance or prior to
removal of an applicable withholding condition), provided that those project costs are
allowable costs under the award.
For example, in anticipation of applying for a JAG award during OJP’s next grant fiscal
year, a state orders police cruisers that will not be delivered until the next fiscal year. The
Updated June 2023

29
state should not use any funds from an expected JAG award but may use funds from
another source. The state is incurring project costs at its own risk pending (1) a valid
acceptance of a JAG award and (2) removal of all applicable withholding conditions (via
a GAM).
80. What is the process for updating contact information related to my grant award?
An applicant with a current, active award(s) must ensure that its JustGrants profile is
current. If the profile is not current, the Entity Administrator should log into Digital Identity
and Access Management Directory (DIAMD) and update the information on its
JustGrants profile prior to applying under this solicitation. For more information, please
refer to the DIAMD FAQs.
81. Now that I received my JAG award acceptance notification email, are there any
written post-award instructions related to award acceptance?
Upon notification that an award is available to accept, grant recipients should refer to
OJP’s post-award instructions located at: Grantee Acceptance Job Aid Reference Guide.
82. What is the process for a recipient to decline a JAG award?

Whenever an award is initiated in JustGrants, it must also be closed in JustGrants. To
close the award in JustGrants, select an award from My Worklist, then select the decline
button to proceed. More information can be found in the Grantee Acceptance Job Aid
Reference Guide on the JustGrants training page.
83. What is the process for a recipient to receive JAG award payments?
JAG award payments are processed through the Department of the Treasury’s
Automated Standard Application for Payments (ASAP). Grantees should use the ASAP
Registration Checklist to guide them through the steps they must take to complete their
ASAP registration.
For more information on how to request funds using ASAP, please reference this user
guide. For questions related to the use of the ASAP system, please contact the
OCFO Customer Service Center by email at Ask.OCFO@usdoj.gov or by phone at 800–
458–0786.
The Department of the Treasury organizes ASAP webinar trainings on a regular basis.
Please refer to the ASAP website for more information on ASAP-related training and
resources.
84. Are JAG funds that are drawn down fully in advance required to be deposited into a
trust fund account?
States (or State Administering Agencies) or units of local government may draw down
JAG funds either in advance or on a reimbursement basis. To draw down in advance, a
trust fund must be established in which to deposit the funds. The trust fund must be in an
interest-bearing account, unless one of the exceptions in 2 C.F.R. § 200.305.b.8 apply. If
subrecipients draw down JAG funds in advance, they also must establish a trust fund in
which to deposit funds. For additional information, see 2 C.F.R. § 200.305.
Updated June 2023

30
85. What is the period of an obligation and an expenditure under a JAG award?
All JAG funds, including interest earned, must be obligated by the award end date and
liquidated no later than 120 days thereafter. Any unobligated or unexpended funds,
including interest earned, must be returned to OJP at the time of closeout.
86. If a State Administering Agency (SAA) intends to request a pass-through waiver,

which requires BJA certification, what is the process?
As noted in the previous FAQ titled “Are states required to pass-through funding to local
jurisdictions?”, there are two types of pass-through that SAAs are required to administer:
variable pass-through (VPT) and less than $10,000.
In certain circumstances, some or all of a project administered by a recipient state may

count as part of the VPT or the less than $10,000 pass-through. In general, a state may do
so to the extent that (1) the state-administered project will directly benefit a unit of local
government, and (2) one unit (or more) of local government voluntarily agrees and
acknowledges in an appropriate written certification that the specified amount of state-
administered funds would directly benefit the unit of local government in question and
agrees that funding the project at the state level is in the best interests of the unit of local
government.
To request a waiver of the VPT or less than $10,000 pass-through requirement a recipient
must:
1. Using OJP’s JustGrants system, submit a “Programmatic Costs” Grant Award

Modification (GAM), marked “Other” and with “JAG—Pass-through Waiver” typed
in the available text box.
2. Attach to the GAM a letter, on the letterhead of the recipient jurisdiction and
signed by the recipient’s “authorized representative” for the JAG award in
question, that:
(a) Provides a summary of the project(s) and stipulates the project(s) will directly
benefit one or more units of local government.
(b) Lists one or more units of local government that agrees funding of the project
is in the best interest of the unit of local government.
(c) Includes the voluntary written certification(s) from the unit(s) of local
government acknowledging the specified amount of state-administered funds
would directly benefit the unit of local government and agrees that that the
project at the state level is in the best interests of the unit of local
government.
87. What are the rules pertaining to tracking and expending funds, including
administrative funds across active JAG awards?
Both the recipient and all subrecipients of JAG funds are prohibited from commingling
funds on a program-by-program or project-by-project basis. For this purpose, use of the
administrative JAG funds to perform work across all active awards in any one year is not
considered commingling.
Updated June 2023

31
88. If an agency proposes to use JAG funding to enter a sole source contract greater
than $250,000, what is the process?
If a proposed procurement contract would exceed the simplified acquisition threshold—
currently $250,000—a recipient of an OJP award may not proceed without competition
unless and until the recipient receives specific advance authorization from OJP to use a
noncompetitive approach for the procurement. For more information, please see the
OJP Sole Source Procurement Fact Sheet and Checklist at: Sole Source Justification
Fact Sheet.
An applicant that intends—without competition—to enter a procurement contract post

award that would exceed $250,000 should include a detailed justification that explains to
OJP why, in the particular circumstances, it is appropriate to proceed without
competition. The justification must be included as part of a sole source Grant Award
Modification (GAM) in the JustGrants System. Various considerations that may be
pertinent to the justification are outlined in the DOJ Grants Financial Guide.
89. What is the process for modifying budgets under JAG?

If your agency would like to modify its JAG budget, email your grant manager with the
details of all requested changes. Your grant manager will help you determine whether a
Grant Award Modification (GAM) must be submitted in JustGrants. If a GAM is deemed
necessary, a Programmatic Cost Change GAM must be submitted with supporting justification
that indicates the reason the modification is requested, as well as a revised budget
worksheet and budget narrative. All reporting requirements must be met in order for the
GAM to be approved. The assigned BJA grant manager, listed in JustGrants, and the full
JAG grant manager listing can be found here:
• Contact list for state and local JAG grants with award amounts of $25,000 or more.
• Contact list for local JAG grants with award amounts of less than $25,000.
90. Can a recipient request to have a JAG award be closed prior to its end date? If so,
are there any advantages for doing so?
JAG awards may be closed as soon as all funds have been obligated and all project
activities have concluded. A final Federal Financial Report (FFR) and final progress
report must be submitted in JustGrants in order to begin the closeout process. In addition,
a final Performance Measurement Tool (PMT) report must be completed and uploaded as
an attachment to the final programmatic report in JustGrants. The early closure of JAG
awards helps demonstrate the effectiveness/impact of JAG funding and saves time for
grantees because no additional reports are required after closeout.
91. What are the requirements to close out a JAG award, and when must closeouts be
submitted?
In order to close a JAG award in compliance, final progress and financial reports must
be submitted and approved and all withholding special conditions must be resolved. A
closeout must be submitted 120 days after the project end date. For assistance with
submitting a closeout in JustGrants, please refer to the Entity Users Closeout: Job Aid
Reference Guide on the JustGrants training page.
Updated June 2023

32
92. What are “Feature Stories,” and how can a JAG grantee submit a success story to
BJA?
The Feature Stories webpage contains stories highlighting how BJA grant funds are
being used across the country and the impact the funding has had on the recipient
agencies and organizations, as well as the communities they serve. This webpage will
be a valuable resource for states, localities, territories, tribes, and criminal justice
professionals who seek to identify and learn about JAG and other successful BJA-
funded projects linked to innovation, crime reduction, and evidence-based practices. If
you have a story you would like to share for possible inclusion on the BJA site, you can
access the Feature Story submission form here: Submit a Feature Story | Bureau of
Justice Assistance.
Updated June 2023

33

Jag Faqs

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jag Faqs

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jag Faqs

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bureau of Justice Assistance

Edward Byrne Memorial Justice

2. What is the authorizing legislation for the JAG program?

Updated June 2023

3. What is the Assistance Listing number for the JAG program?

AWARD ELIGIBILITY/FORMULA INFORMATION

Note: The application must be submitted by an applicant with a Unique Entity

Category 1—Eligible Allocation Amounts of Less Than $25,000: Units of local

Category 2—Eligible Allocation Amounts of $25,000 or More: Units of local government

Updated June 2023

6. How is the formula calculated?

7. Why would a local jurisdiction not receive an allocation?

Updated June 2023

9. Are states required to pass-through funding to local jurisdictions?

10. Is it possible for a recipient to make subawards to private and nonprofit

Updated June 2023

See 34 U.S.C. § 10152(b), which states,

12. Is a National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) 3 percent set-aside

Updated June 2023

13. Does the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) set-aside

The requirement for a NIBRS set-aside is applicable to all jurisdictions in a disparate

14. How should FY 2018–2021 JAG recipients communicate National Incident-Based

Updated June 2023

POTENTIAL FUNDING REDUCTIONS

17. Are JAG awards subject to any potential funding reductions?

For Frequently Asked Questions on SORNA, please refer to https://smart.ojp.gov/faqs.

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

26. Who should be listed as the authorized representative on a JAG application?

Awards of less than $25,000 are 2 years in length. Extensions of up to 2 years

• For State JAG awards:

Updated June 2023

To satisfy this requirement, BJA requires the submission of a properly completed

To satisfy this requirement, BJA requires the submission of a properly completed

Updated June 2023

Leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

45. Can JAG funding be used to support election security projects?

Updated June 2023

49. Can JAG funds be used to purchase Rapid DNA instruments?

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

61. Does OJP support a policy on denying federal benefits to an officer or to an

This certification can be signed by the grantee’s authorized representative or a person

Updated June 2023

65. Can JAG funds be used for membership dues?

66. Can JAG funds be used for administrative expenses?

Updated June 2023

Updated June 2023

73. What is supplanting and do supplanting prohibitions apply to JAG funding?

Updated June 2023