Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

PSMID 2017 Guidelines For HIV Infected HCWs

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Guidelines on the Management of HIV-infected

Healthcare Workers in the Philippines

(Released on November 27, 2017)

1. Introduction

The number of people living with HIV in the Philippines


continues to increase at an alarming rate. In May 2017 alone,
there were 1,098 new HIV cases reported to the HIV/AIDS &
ART Registry of the Philippines, the highest number recorded
in a single month since 1984.1 As the virus spreads throughout
the archipelago, healthcare workers are not spared from the
epidemic. Data from two treatment hubs showed that 0.03%
of the patients infected with HIV are healthcare workers (K.
Leyritana and M. Bartolome, personal communication, 2016).
An HIV testing project conducted in Metro Manila among
406 men who have sex with men revealed that among the 40
Western Blot-confirmed HIV cases, one participant (2.5%) was a
physician.2 The risk of HIV infection among healthcare workers
is mitigated by the availability of post-exposure prophylaxis
(PEP) and personal protective equipment that prevent injuries
from sharp medical devices. However, it must be noted that
healthcare workers may also be exposed to HIV through other
routes, such as unprotected vaginal sex and anal sex, among
others.

The diagnosis of HIV continues to carry a significant stigma in


the Philippines. This stigma may impede access to healthcare
services, such as HIV testing and treatment.3 For healthcare
professionals, a diagnosis of HIV infection can be devastating.
There have been reports of newly-diagnosed students leaving
medical school or pursuing a non-clinical specialty.4 HIV-
infected physicians are also hesitant to disclose their HIV status
to hospital authorities from fear of discrimination, curtailment
of privileges or expulsion.4 Unfortunately, the management
and treatment of healthcare workers living with HIV are not
always evidence-based and do not take into account the
actual but small risk of HIV transmission to the patient and the
inherent human rights of the healthcare worker.
The Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
(PSMID) HIV subcommittee on healthcare workers published
these recommendations to guide physicians and hospital
administrators involved in the management of HIV-infected
healthcare workers. The recommendations were drafted in
collaboration with the Philippine Medical Association (PMA),
Philippine College of Physicians (PCP), Philippine College of
Surgeons (PCS), Philippine Obstetrical and Gynecological
Society (POGS), Philippine Dental Association (PDA), Philippine
Association of Medical Technologists (PAMET), Philippine
Hospital Infection Control Society (PHICS), Philippine Pediatric
Society (PPS), Philippine Nurses Association (PNA), and the
Craniofacial Foundation of the Philippines (CFFP). The main
objective of this paper is to provide an ethical and legal
framework in managing the HIV-infected healthcare worker,
balancing the rights and safety of both the patient and the
healthcare provider. These recommendations are based on
current evidence and will be updated as new data emerge.

2. Definition of Terms

Infected healthcare worker – a healthcare provider who is


infected with HIV.

Patient – an individual seeking health services from an


-infected healthcare worker.

Attending physician – the physician who manages the infected


healthcare worker. The attending physician may not necessarily
be affiliated with the healthcare worker’s place of work.

Hospital Infection Prevention and Control Unit (HIPCU) –


the hospital unit responsible for monitoring, preventing,
and controlling the spread of infection in the hospital; also
sometimes known as the Infection Control Committee (ICC) or
Hospital Infection Control Unit (HICU).

HIV/AIDS Core Team (HACT) – a multidisciplinary group of


healthcare workers involved in coordination, implementation,
assessment, training and research on matters related to the
diagnosis and management of HIV/AIDS patients and the
prevention and control of HIV transmission in the hospital.

Exposure – a sentinel event where a patient is accidentally


exposed to the blood or body fluids of an infected healthcare
worker.

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) - combination of several


antiretroviral medicines used in treating and controlling viral
replication of HIV.

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) – antiretroviral medicines


provided to an individual after exposure to HIV to prevent or
reduce the risk of HIV infection.

3. The risk of HIV transmission from a healthcare worker to


a patient

Literature review shows only nine published cases of possible


HIV transmission from healthcare workers to their patients.
The first six cases were published in 1995 when an HIV-infected
dentist in the USA was investigated for possibly infecting six
of his patients.5 According to the report, the dental practice
did not follow standard sterile techniques and universal
precautions; however, epidemiologic analysis also revealed
that the patients had other risk factors for HIV infection.5 In
1996, a 61-year-old HIV-negative female with no risk factor
for HIV infection underwent surgery in France.6 Although she
did not require blood transfusion during the procedure and
none of the surgical staff were found to be HIV positive, she
seroconverted four weeks after surgery. Phylogenetic analyses
of the HIV-1 genomic regions traced back the infection from a
female night-shift nurse that took care of her post-operatively.6
Another case published in 1999 described the transmission
of HIV from an orthopedic surgeon with AIDS to a female
patient who underwent total hip prosthesis placement with
bone graft.7 In 2006, a 32 year-old woman developed acute
retroviral syndrome two weeks after caesarean section. The
patient tested positive for HIV and the obstetrician who was
known to have HIV admitted that he had a needlestick injury
while performing the caesarean section.8
Current evidence supports the conclusion that the risk of HIV
transmission from an HIV-infected healthcare worker to a
patient is very low and is estimated to be 2.4─24 per 1 million
procedures.9,10 In the United Kingdom, the Expert Advisory
Group on AIDS, the Advisory Group on Hepatitis, and the UK
Advisory Panel for Healthcare Workers Infected with Blood-
borne Viruses concluded that the risk of HIV transmission
from an infected and untreated healthcare worker to a patient
is extremely low for most invasive procedures and negligible
for less invasive procedures.10 In the USA, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention conducted a study of more
than 22,000 patients treated by 64 HIV-infected healthcare
workers. Laboratory and epidemiologic analyses did not reveal
any healthcare-associated transmission of HIV.11

Although the documented healthcare risk for HIV transmission


is low, a standard stratification of risks associated with each
medical/surgical procedure is important when drafting
recommendations for the HIV-infected healthcare worker.
Reitsma et al. classified medical and surgical procedures into
three categories, depending on the risk of transmission of
blood-borne viruses (HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C) from the
infected healthcare worker to a patient:12

Category I procedures are medical procedures where the


likelihood of viral transmission is deemed negligible. The
anatomical site of the procedure is either superficial, with
minimal involvement of sharps, or does not involve sharps
at all. The surgical field and the physician’s hands are visible
at all times. These procedures also include history-taking and
standard medical exams where there is no risk for blood-to-
blood contact between the healthcare worker and the patient.

Category II procedures are procedures where viral transmission


from healthcare worker to patient is unlikely but theoretically
not impossible, and the risk of blood-to-blood contact between
physician and patient is minimal. Procedures under this
category involve surgeries where the operative field and the
physicians’ hands are well visualized, and no deep spaces are
reached except when using medical devices (such as catheters
and scopes).
Category III procedures are exposure-prone procedures
(EPPs) where healthcare transmission has been previously
documented. These include surgeries that are extensive and
involve deep cavities where the healthcare provider’s finger
and a sharp instrument are simultaneously present in a poorly
visualized or highly confined anatomic site. EPPs are listed in
Table 1.

Table 1: List of Exposure-Prone Procedures*

• Trauma surgery
• Orthopedic surgery
• Cardiothoracic surgeries
• Open extensive head and neck surgeries involving bone
• Dental procedures including periodontal surgeries,
tooth extractions
• Neuro surgery
• Amniocentesis
• Chorionic villus sampling
• Hysterectomy, oophorectomy
• Caesarian section
• Open abdominal and pelvic surgeries
• Episiotomy and herniorraphy
• Organ transplantation
• Plastic surgery involving extensive cosmetic
procedure and/or involving bone
• Thyroidectomy
• Open surgical procedure >3 hours duration
• Non-elective procedures performed at the
Emergency Department
• Interaction with patients in which biting of physicians
is significant

*Adapted from Reitsma, et al. 12

Aside from the inherent risks associated with medical


procedures, the healthcare worker’s viral load also affects
HIV transmissibility. The World Health Organization currently
recommends all individuals living with HIV to be on ART
regardless of CD4+ T cell count.13 Moreover, early initiation of
ART reduces progression to AIDS and decreases mortality.13
Hence, it is strongly recommended that ART is promptly
initiated, most especially among HIV-infected healthcare
workers.

4. HIV testing of healthcare workers

Standard medical testing and healthcare assessment, including


a complete physical examination and documentation of
vaccination status, should be conducted among healthcare
workers who are about to commence training or employment
in a clinical care setting. We recommend that HIV antibody
testing be offered and integrated in this health assessment,
where HIV testing will be performed routinely unless the
healthcare worker opts out.

It must be noted that HIV antibody testing must be voluntary


and cannot be a requirement for consideration for employment
in the Philippines. It is considered unlawful under the
Philippine AIDS Prevention and Control Act of 1998 (Republic
Act 8504) to perform compulsory HIV testing as a pre-requisite
for employment or admission to an educational institution.14

Although testing is not mandatory by law, all new healthcare


workers should be counseled on the importance of knowing
one’s HIV status. Healthcare workers, especially those
involved in EPPs, are ethically bound to seek HIV testing as
soon as they have been exposed to HIV occupationally or
through other means. Appropriate medical and occupational
support should be provided once a healthcare worker is found
to be infected with HIV.

5. Health Management Team

An infected healthcare worker must have an attending


physician overseeing and managing his/her care. It is also
recommended that a health management team be organized
to ensure patient safety and provide support to the infected
healthcare worker. This management team will be composed
of the infected health care worker’s attending physician, a
representative of the HIPCU, the head of the HACT, and the
Deputy Director for Hospital Operations or its equivalent
position. The head of the hospital HACT may or may not be the
healthcare worker’s attending physician.

It is the attending physician’s responsibility to evaluate the


clinical status of the infected healthcare worker, including his/
her HIV RNA viral load. The HIPCU shall assess the procedures
that the healthcare worker may perform safely as well as his/
her adherence to accepted infection control precautions. The
HACT is responsible for ensuring that the healthcare worker
has access to antiretroviral medicines and proper counseling.
The HACT also ensures that the hospital has access to post-
exposure prophylactic drugs in the event of patient exposure
or a sentinel event.

The deputy director for hospital operations does not need to


be aware of the identity of the HIV-infected healthcare worker.
However, the deputy director must be aware that an infected
healthcare worker is employed by the institution.

In cases of patient exposure, the HIPCU shall be primarily


responsible for patient management. This shall be done in
cooperation with the HACT and the hospital administration
through the office of the Deputy Director for Hospital
Operations.

6. Management of HIV-infected healthcare workers

The infected healthcare worker shall have an attending physician


who will primarily be responsible for his/her management. The
attending physician shall update the HIPCU and HACT on the
health status of the healthcare worker, including confidential
forwarding of laboratory test results.

The infected healthcare worker may perform any medical


procedure, except EPPs. To perform EPPs, the healthcare
worker must meet both of the following criteria:

a. He/she must be on regular antiretroviral therapy


AND
b. Have a plasma HIV viral load of less than 500
copies/ml1*
*
There is currently no data on the minimum viral load necessary for transmission of HIV to occur from an infected healthcare
worker to a patient. The cut-off of <500 copies/ml is an arbitrary practice restriction threshold. This threshold was adapted
from the 2010 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) guidelines,4,15 as agreed upon by the committee. The
cut-off of <500 copies/ml was chosen because those with undetectable viral load may experience viral “blips”/spikes up to

500 copies/ml despite ART.


The attending physician shall be responsible for monitoring the
healthcare worker’s medical care and declaring him/her “fit to
work.” It is ideal that the healthcare worker has appropriate
immune reconstitution (without opportunistic infections and
with a CD4 T cell count >350 cells/mm3). In cases when the
CD4 T cell count does not reach 350 cells/mm3, it is up to
the attending physician judge whether to recommend the
healthcare worker as “fit to work”. He/she may also offer
options for the healthcare worker to be assigned to a specific
hospital section/ward, or to recommend that it is safe for the
healthcare worker to perform EPPs. The HIPCU shall provide
clearance to perform EPPs based on the recommendations of
the attending physician and available laboratory results.

6.1 Monitoring

All infected healthcare workers must undergo medical


follow-up as recommended by their attending
physician. Following the resolution of opportunistic
infections, if any, it is recommended that the
healthcare worker undergo medical follow-up every
three months.

Viral load monitoring is recommended to be done


every 6 months.

6.2 Clearance for healthcare workers wishing to


perform EPPs

Healthcare workers on effective and regularly taken


antiretroviral therapy and have a viral load of less
than 500 copies/ml may be allowed to perform EPPs.
If a healthcare worker’s viral load increases above 500
copies/ml, it is recommended that EPPs should not
be performed. This restriction shall be recommended
by the attending physician and implemented by the
HIPCU and HACT.

7. Disclosure

Healthcare workers are not obliged to disclose to the hospital/


workplace their HIV status. This applies to healthcare workers
who are newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed with HIV.
However, it is highly encouraged that he/she informs the
HIPCU and HACT.

Providing healthcare services is a two-way relationship,


where safety of both the patient and the healthcare provider
must be considered. Informing the HIPCU and HACT of the
healthcare provider’s HIV status would ensure that necessary
support and medical care is made available to the worker
while ensuring that no patient is being exposed to undue risks
from EPPs.

Any colleague or co-worker who is aware of the HIV status


of the infected healthcare worker is likewise not obliged and
cannot be forced to disclose the status of his/her co-worker.

The attending physician managing the healthcare worker is


also not obliged to inform the healthcare worker’s place of
work unless it is with the express instruction and consent of
the healthcare worker.

Once the HIPCU and HACT have been informed, the HIPCU
shall be responsible for informing the office of the deputy
director for hospital operations of the number of infected
healthcare workers employed by the hospital.
It is expected that all cases shall be managed confidentially
and in accordance with the law.

8. Management of a patient following healthcare exposure

Each patient encounter is unique and depends on the rapport


between the healthcare worker and the patient. Disclosure of
a healthcare worker’s HIV status to a patient prior to treatment
is not recommended but is also not prohibited.
In cases where an HIV-infected healthcare worker accidentally
exposed a patient to the worker’s blood, the infected healthcare
worker is responsible for immediately alerting the HIPCU and
HACT that a possible exposure occurred. Standard protocols
on occupational exposure that are set by the hospital’s HIPCU
shall be followed, including offering of baseline HIV testing for
the patient.
A detailed risk assessment shall be performed by the HIPCU
immediately. The appropriateness of PEP will be determined
by the HIPCU after performing the risk assessment. Since
animal studies have shown that PEP becomes less effective as
the time from exposure lengthens, PEP must be offered and
taken by the patient as soon as possible.16 These services,
including antiretroviral medications, shall be provided for free.

PEP with two antiretroviral medications is effective, but the


combination of three medications is preferred.16 A combination
of tenofovir and lamivudine is the preferred backbone regimen
for adults and children >10 years old. For children 10 years old
and below but older than 2 weeks, zidovudine and abacavir
combination is the preferred backbone. Lopinavir/ritonavir
is the preferred third drug for both groups, especially if the
healthcare worker has been already on ART. For children
less than 2 weeks old, the combination of lamivudine and
zidovudine is the preferred PEP backbone with nevirapine as
the third drug (Table 2).17
Table 2. Recommended post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)
regimens*

Backbone Antiretrovirals Third Drug


HIV PEP Regimen for adults and children >10 years old
Tenofovir (TDF) + Lamivudine
Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)
(3TC)

HIV PEP Regimen for children > 2 weeks old and < 10 years old

Zidovudine (AZT) + Abacavir


Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)
(ABC)

HIV PEP Regimen for children <2 weeks old


Lamivudine (3TC) + Zidovudine
Nevirapine (NVP)
(AZT)
* Adapted from the WHO guidelines on post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV17

It is the responsibility of both the HIPCU and HACT to manage


the patient. Repeat HIV testing is recommended to be
performed 3 months after exposure, regardless of whether the
patient accepted or declined PEP.

9. Sanctions on non-compliant healthcare workers

Any person who causes another to get infected with HIV


willfully or negligently in the course of the practice of his/
her profession through unsafe and unsanitary practices/
procedures is subject to the penalties stipulated in Section 14
of R.A. 8504.14
References

1. National HIV/AIDS & STI Surveillance and Strategic


Information Unit, Epidemiology Bureau, DOH. Stat of
the Month (May 2017). http://www.doh.gov.ph/stat_
of_the_month. Accessed November 20, 2017.

2. Gangcuangco LM, Tan ML, Berba RP. Prevalence


and risk factors for HIV infection among men having
sex with men in Metro Manila, Philippines. Southeast
Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44(5):810-817.

3. Opollo JG, Gray J. Stigma in HIV-infected health care


workers in Kenya: a mixed-method approach. J Assoc
Nurses AIDS Care. 2015;26(5):639-651.

4. Salvana EM, Solante R. HIV in the Filipino Health-


care Worker: A Way Forward. Acta Med Philippina.
2015;49(4):1-6.
5. Karrel AI. HIV-infected physicians: how best to protect
the public? CMAJ. 1995;152(7):1059-1062.

6. Goujon CP, Schneider VM, Grofti J, et al. Phylogenetic


analyses indicate an atypical nurse-to-patient trans-
mission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J
Virol. Mar 2000;74(6):2525-2532.

7. Lot F, Seguier JC, Fegueux S, et al. Probable trans-


mission of HIV from an orthopedic surgeon to a patient
in France. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(1):1-6.

8. Mallolas J, Arnedo M, Pumarola T, et al. Transmission


of HIV-1 from an obstetrician to a patient during a cae-
sarean section. AIDS. 2006;20(2):285-287.

9. Chua A, Leo YS, Kurup A, Chlebicki MP, Lee CC.


Healthcare workers and HIV health issues. Ann Acad
Med Singapore. 2008;37(7):576-579.

10. Public Health England. The Management of HIV-in-


fected Healthcare Workers who perform exposure
prone procedures: updated guidance, January 2014.
11. Robert LM, Chamberland ME, Cleveland JL,
et al. Investigations of patients of health care
workers infected with HIV. The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention database. Ann Intern Med.
1995;122(9):653-657.

12. Reitsma AM, Closen ML, Cunningham M, et al. Infected


physicians and invasive procedures: safe practice
management. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1665-1672.

13. World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start


antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis
for HIV. Geneva, 2015.

14. Congress of the Philippines. Philippine AIDS


Prevention and Control Act of 1998. http://www.
lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1998/ra_8504_1998.
html.

15. Henderson DK, Dembry L, Fishman NO, et al. SHEA


guideline for management of healthcare workers who
are infected with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus,
and/or human immunodeficiency virus. Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol. Mar 2010;31(3):203-232.

16. Kuhar DT, Henderson DK, Struble KA, et al.


Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the
management of occupational exposures to human
immunodeficiency virus and recommendations
for postexposure prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol. 2013;34(9):875-892.

17. World Health Organization. Guidelines on post-


exposure prophylaxis for HIV and the use of co-
trimoxazole prophylaxis for HIV-related infections
among adults, adolescents and children:
Recommendations for a public health approach.
December 2014 supplement to the 2013 consolidated
guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating
and preventing HIV infection. Geneva, 2014.
Appendix A. Algorithm for the management of the HIV-infected
healthcare worker

Appendix A. Algorithm for the management of the HIV-infected

positive
Health care worker HIV test
result

Routine healthcare check-up


Including HIV test, education and negative
counseling
Post test
counseling/advise
on healthy
Opt out lifestyle

No HIV test HIV test done


Done

Continue with standard


pre-employment/employee
evaluation

No
prov
opp
appr

(CD4

Abbreviations: EPP: Exposure-prone procedures; HCW: healthcare worker

Abbreviations: EPP: Exposure-prone procedures; HCW: healthcare worker


V-infected healthcare worker

positive
Refer to attending
physician

Provide standards
of care for
individuals
infected with HIV

Will HCW yes Refrain from


provide EPPs performing EPPs until
in line of viral load is < 500
work? copies/ml

no

No practice restriction,
provided he/she has no active Adherent to May perform EPPs.
yes
opportunistic infection and/or with ARVs AND Continue viral load
viral load is < monitoring every 6
appropriate immune reconstitution months
3 500 copies/ml?
(CD4 > 350 mm )

no

Refrain from performing


EPPs until viral load
is < 500 copies/ml.
Monitor viral load
every 6 months
Appendix B. Algorithm for the management of the exposed patient to an
HIV-infected healthcare worker

Appendix B. Algorithm forAppendix B. Algorithm


the management of thefor
exp

Patient exposure Patient exposure

Healthcare worker immediatelyHealthcare worker immediately


informs HIPCU/HACT informs HIPCU/HACT

HIPCU/HACT HIPCU/HACT
1. Conducts detailed risk assessment 1. Conducts detailed risk assessment
2. Offers PEP to patient immediately2.following
Offers the
PEPexposure
to patient immediately follow
3. toOffers
3. Offers HIV testing and ancillary labs HIV testing and ancillary labs to pa
patient
4. Counsels and reassures the patient 4. Counsels and reassures the patient
5. operations
5. Informs deputy director for hospital Informs deputy director for hospital oper
of exposure

For the patient:


1. Continue PEP for 28 days
yesto be yes
2. HIV testing offered f
Exposure is yes Exposure is
of exposure, and at 3 mon
considered considered
3. Counseling shall also be o
significant? significant?

no no

May discontinue post-exposure May discontinue post-exposure


prophylaxis and further HIV prophylaxis and further HIV
testing of patient is not necessary testing of patient is not necessary

Abbreviations:
Abbreviations: HIPCU: Hospital Infection HIPCU:
Prevention and Hospital
Control Unit;Infection Preventio
HACT: HIV/AIDS C
Abbreviations: HIPCU: Hospital Infection Prevention and Control Unit; HACT: HIV/
AIDS Core Team; PEP: post-exposure prophylaxis
the
the
posedexposed patient
for management
the management
patient toexposed
of
toofanthe an HIV-infected
the exposed tohealthcare
patient
patient
HIV-infected anto
healthcare worker healthc
an HIV-infected
HIV-infected
worker he

Note:
Note: Each Each hospital
hospital must havemust have
Note: a sentinel
Note:
Each
a sentinel hospital
event event
Each hospital
must havemustahave a senti
sentinel ev
reportingreporting
policy inpolicy
place in place
which which
reporting
includes includes
reporting
policy
but inbut
policy
is not isinnot
place place which
which includ
includes but
ely
limited
limited to to reporting
reporting of limited
occupational
of occupational limited
exposures exposures
to to
reporting
to reporting toof occupational
of occupational exposue
blood and body
blood and body fluids. fluids. blood blood andfluids.
and body body fluids.

nt
y following
wing the exposure
the exposure
abs to patient
atient
nt
ital operations
rations of exposure
of exposure

For the patient:


For the patient:
for 28 days 1. Continue 1. Continue
PEP for 28PEP for 28 days
days
be offered
for for
2.free
free at time at2.
HIV timeHIVtotesting
testing to be for
be offered offered fortime
free at free at time
yes
and
nths.at 3 months. of exposure,of exposure,
and at 3 and at 3 months.
months.
all also be offered
offered 3. Counseling
3. Counseling shall alsoshall also be offered
be offered

HIV/AIDS
revention
on and
Core Core
and
Control
Team; Team;
Control
PEP:Unit; PEP:
Unit;post-exposure
HACT: HACT:
HIV/AIDS
post-exposure Coreprophylaxis
HIV/AIDS
prophylaxis CorePEP:
Team; Team; PEP: post-exposure
post-exposure prophylaxis
prophylaxis

You might also like