Arganbright
Arganbright
Arganbright
Similarly, (H19 1H2) = (i^, ίί 2 ) and (fli, wfl"2) = (iϊ,, (n ~ 1)H2, H2) for
n > 1. The descending central series of G is defined by setting GL = G
and Gn = (G%_i, G) for π > 1. A group G is said to have class c if
G c + 1 = 1 and Gc Φ 1. Finally, the derived series of G is defined by
setting G{0) = G and Giί+1) = (G ( ί ) , G (ί) ) for i ^ 0.
( *) (xy)p = xpypcd
where c e P{ζx, y*)2) and d e ζx, y)p. Applying this result to the ex-
pression (ap, b) = a~p(a(a, b))p one can obtain the following lemma by
repeated induction.
Proo/. (a) I t is known ([4], Th. 2.55, p. 55) that (G<)n S Gin.
Since m — (n — 1) ^ i it follows from Theorem 1 that
Gin S P(G<w-(n-l,) S P ( ^ ) .
(b) I t follows from Lemma 1 that (P(G))n £ {P(G), (n - 1)G) S
P(Gn)Gp+n^. By Theorem 1, G , ^ C P(G P ), so
Proof. We assume that the result holds for all groups of order
less than \G\. It follows from Corollary 1.1 that G (1) satisfies the
hypothesis of this corollary. Since |G ( 1 ) \ < \G\ we have
{1) k)
(**) (G<i>)<*+<-i> g P((G Y )
for k ^ 1.
By Theorem 2.54 of [4], G{t) S G 2t . Hence for k - 1 it follows
from Theorem 1 that G ( ί ) S Gn+1 S P(G2) = P(G{1)). If A > 1 we re-
place k by k — 1 in (**) and obtain
Proof. It follows from (*) that the latter condition implies re-
gularity. On the other hand, if G is regular, then all subgroups of
G are regular. Alperin ([1], Lemma 3.1.1, p. 96) has shown that if
H is a regular 2-generator 3-group, then its derived group is cyclic.
Hence H3 £ P(H2).
p3
EXAMPLE 5. Let W = <α> 2 <&>, where α^ = 6 = 1. Then
I Wi/Wi+ί \ = p for i ^ 2 and ΫF has class p 3 . Thus W5 Φ 1. Let
# = W/W6. Then fl"2 is an elementary abelian p-group, d(H2) = 3,
iϊ 4 ^ 1, and P(H2) = 1. Thus ί ί 4 g P ί f t ) . If w = 3 we may let
G = H. If % > 3, let D be one of the nonabelian groups of order
p3. Then \D2\ = p. Let if be the group formed by taking the direct
product on n — 3 copies of D. Set G = H x K. Then G2 = H2 x J^ 2
and d(G2) = d(ίf2) + (w - 3) = n. Clearly G4 g P(G 2 ).
16 DEANE E. ARGANBRIGHT
by Lemma 1.
We next claim that d(P(G2)) ^ d(G2/G3). For if d(G2/G3) = ί, then
there exist elements gly-"ygt in G2 such that for each geG2,g —
gm(i) # . # ^(^/^ for some integers m(i) and Λ G G3. It follows from (*)
that g* = (^f)m(1) (gΐ)m{t)hpcd, where /^ and c are elements of P(G 3 )
and d e G2V. Hence hp = c = d = 1 and the assertion follows.
Since P(G 2 ) is abelian and G4 g P(G 2 ) we thus have d(G4) ^ d(G2/G3).
Hence
d(GA)
d(G2/G3)
^ (lβ)d\d - 1) + (l/2)d(d - 1) ,
where the last inequality follows from Theorem 2.83 of [4],
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Received November 9, 1967, and in revised form July 15, 1968. This paper con-
tains portions of the author's doctoral thesis at the University of Washington. The
research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant NSF
GP-5691.