Module 2 SS21 Understanding The Self FINAL
Module 2 SS21 Understanding The Self FINAL
Module 2 SS21 Understanding The Self FINAL
MODULE 2 FDDavid
Introduction
Activity 1. Please answer the following Diagnostic Test. This activity aims to draw out your own perceptions of
yourself and how you relate with and to the world. Since you do not yet have a clear understanding of the subject
matter, we do not expect you to elucidate much on the matter. However, we encourage you to introspect and think
deeply and clearly as your answer the following questions. Answer the questions that follow. Limit answers to 2-3
sentences per question.
Always answer with your First Name Middle Initial Last name; Course, Year and Section; Unit/Chapter,
Activity Title and ANSWERS.
For example:
Sample: Sample:
Activity 2.
1
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Guide Questions:
1. Title: ________
2. How do you view/look at the SELF? Include definitions, descriptions, and examples.
______________________________________________________________________________
3. In what Manner will you present the SELF to others? Are there names or titles or categories you would like to cluster the
SELF with?
______________________________________________________________________________
4. How shall you manage and care for the SELF as being member of a family, community, church, school, or any other
criteria you would like to be identified with?
______________________________________________________________________________
Do you know the meaning of your name? if you have more than one name,
perhaps you know the meaning of both. Others even know the meaning of
their last name. You may cite all your names with meanings. If in case you do
not know, please ask your parents/guardians or anyone who knows the
meaning of your name or what was in your parents’ minds when they decided
ENGAGE to give you your name. You may tell a very brief story in 2-3 sentences. Again
write your answers in an intermediate pad. Write the title of the Chapter/Unit
and Activity number. Ex. The Self from Various Perspectives – Overview of the
Self Activity 2. “What’s in a Name” (then answers)
Remember: “Every name is given for a reason. Every name has a
meaning, and there are no accidental or arbitrary names.”
2
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
• The SELF is one of the most interesting topics that people talk about every day.
3
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
• We may not be conscious about it but every time we mention the “I” (I will… I will go to school..I will hang
out with…). We are talking about ourselves as actors.
4
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
5
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
PHILOSOPHY - study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially in an academic discipline.
- a particular theory that someone has about how to live or how to deal with a particular situation.
- academic discipline concerned with investigating the nature of significance of ordinary and scientific beliefs -
investigates the legitimacy of concepts by rational argument concerning their implications, relationships as well as reality,
knowledge, moral judgment, etc.
The Greeks were the ones who seriously questioned myths and moved away from them to understand reality and
respond to perennial questions of curiosity, including the question of the self.
The different perspectives and views on the self can be best seen and understood by revisiting its prime movers and identify
the most important conjectures made by philosophers from the ancient times to the contemporary period.
The Pre-Socratics (Thales, Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus, • concerned with the problem of the self
Empedocles, etc.) were concerned with answering questions such as
• “the true task of the philosopher is to know oneself”
• What is the world really made up of? • “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
• Why is the world the way it is?
• What explains the changes that happen around us? • underwent a trial for ‘corrupting the minds of the youth’
• arché- origin or source/the “soul”/the primal matter
• the soul’s movement is the ultimate arché of all other movement • ‘the worst thing that can happen to anyone is to live but die
• arché has no origin outside itself and cannot be destroyed inside’
• explains the multiplicity of things in the world • “every person is dualistic”
• man = body + soul
• individual = imperfect/impermanent (body) + perfect &
permanent (soul)
6
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
7
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
David HUME
• disagrees with the all the other aforementioned philosophers
• “one can only know what comes from the senses & experiences” (he is an empiricist)
• “the self is not an entity beyond the physical body”
• you know that other people are humans not because you have seen their soul, but because you
see them, hear them, feel them etc
• “the self is nothing but a bundle of impressions and ideas” • impression – - basic objects of our
experience/sensation - forms the core of our thoughts • idea – - copies of impressions - not as
“real” as impressions
• self = a collection of different perceptions which rapidly succeed each other
• self = in a perpetual flux and movement
• we want to believe that there is a unified , coherent self, soul, mind, etc. but ~~actually~~ it is all
just a combination of experiences.
Immanuel KANT
• agrees with HUME that everything starts with
perception/sensation of impressions
• there is a MIND that regulates these impressions
• “time, space, etc. are ideas that one cannot find in the world, but
is built in our minds
• “apparatus of the mind”
• the self organizes different impressions that one gets in relation
to his own existence
• we need active intelligence to synthesize all knowledge and
experience
• the self is not only personality but also the seat of knowledge
Kant
Gilbert RYLE
• denies the internal, non-physical self
• “what truly matters is the behavior that a person manifests in his
day-to-day life.”
• looking for the self is like entering LU and looking for the
“university” (explain!)
• the self is not an entity one can locate and analyze but simply
the convenient name that we use to refer to the behaviors that we
make
Ryle
8
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
MERLEAU-PONTY
• a phenomenologist who says the mind- body bifurcation is an
invalid problem
• mind and body are inseparable
• “one’s body is his opening toward his existence to the world”
• the living body, his thoughts, emotions, and experiences are all
one.
• if you hate this subject, Merleau-Ponty understands you.
Merleau-Ponty
MY PHILOSOPHY OF SELF
Which of the philosophy of the self relates to your
own belief and explain how each view impact your
self-understanding? Write on your notebook. No
need to submit.
9
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
According to Freud’s psychoanalytic theory, personality develops through a series of stages, each characterized by a
certain internal psychological conflict.
Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of personality argues that human behavior is the result of the interactions among three
component parts of the mind: the id, ego, and superego. This theory, known as Freud’s structural theory of personality, places
10
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
great emphasis on the role of unconscious psychological conflicts in shaping behavior and personality. Dynamic interactions
among these fundamental parts of the mind are thought to progress through five distinct psychosexual stages of development.
Over the last century, however, Freud’s ideas have since been met with criticism, in part because of his singular focus on
sexuality as the main driver of human personality development.
According to Freud, our personality develops from the interactions among what he proposed as the three fundamental
structures of the human mind: the id, ego, and superego. Conflicts among these three structures, and our efforts to find
balance among what each of them “desires,” determines how we behave and approach the world. What balance we strike in
any given situation determines how we will resolve the conflict between two overarching behavioral tendencies: our biological
aggressive and pleasure-seeking drives vs. our socialized internal control over those drives.
Conflict within the mind: According to Freud, the job of the ego is to balance the aggressive/pleasure-seeking drives of the
id with the moral control of the superego.
The id, ego, and superego: According to Freud’s structural model, the personality is
divided into the id, ego, and superego. On this diagram, the smaller portion above the
water signifies the conscious mind, while the much larger portion below the water
illustrates the unconscious mind.
Psychosexual Stages of Development
Freud believed that the nature of the conflicts among the id, ego, and superego change
over time as a person grows from child to adult. Specifically, he maintained that these
conflicts progress through a series of five basic stages, each with a different focus: oral,
anal, phallic, latency, and genital. He called his idea the psychosexual theory of
development, with each psychosexual stage directly related to a different physical
center of pleasure.
11
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
Across these five stages, the child is presented with different conflicts between their biological drives (id) and their social and
moral conscience (supereg0) because their biological pleasure-seeking urges focus on different areas of the body (what
Freud called “erogenous zones”). The child’s ability to resolve these internal conflicts determines their future ability to cope
and function as an adult. Failure to resolve a stage can lead one to become fixated in that stage, leading to unhealthy
personality traits; successful resolution of the stages leads to a healthy adult.
The proponent of this theory, Erik Erikson, identified eight basic development stages that the individual has to
pass through in his life. Each of these stages has a specific psychosocial crisis that affects the development of the child.
In Erik Erikson’s theory, adolescence stage is a period of identity development. Identity formation is usually viewed
as a process that requires adolescents to distance themselves from the strong expectations and definitions imposed by
parents and other family members. To achieve an individual identity, one must create a vision of the self that is authentic and
having hold of one’s destiny in an effort to reach goals that are personally meaningful.
During each
stage, the person
experiences life crisis which
could have negative
consequences if not
properly resolved.
12
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
This theory was advocated by Jean Piaget, who believed that a child enters the world lacking virtually all the basic cognitive
competencies of the adult, and gradually develops these competencies by passing through a series of periods of development.
(please check again the video and the table below to learn this theory)
13
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
Stage 1. Obedience and Punishment Stage 3. Good Interpersonal Stage 5. Social Contract and Individual Rights.
Orientation. The child/individual is Relationships. The child/individual is The child/individual becomes aware that while
good in order to avoid being good in order to be seen as being a rules/laws might exist for the good of the greatest
punished. If a person is punished, good person by others. Therefore, number, there are times when they will work
against the interest of particular individuals.
they must have done wrong. answers relate to the approval of
others. The issues are not always clear-cut. For example,
Stage 2. Individualism and Exchange. in Heinz’s dilemma, the protection of life is more
At this stage, children recognize that •Stage 4. Maintaining the Social important than breaking the law against stealing.
there is not just one right view that is Order. The child/individual becomes
handed down by the authorities. aware of the wider rules of society, so • Stage 6. Universal Principles. People at this
Different individuals have different judgments concern obeying the rules in stage have developed their own set of moral
viewpoints. order to uphold the law and to avoid guidelines which may or may not fit the law. The
principles apply to everyone.
guilt.
E.g., human rights, justice, and equality. The
person will be prepared to act to defend these
principles even if it means going against the rest of
society in the process and having to pay the
consequences of disapproval and or imprisonment.
Kohlberg doubted few people reached this stage.
14
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
1.2.5. WILLIAM JAMES' CONCEPT OF SELF: THE ME-SELF AND THE I-SELF
• The self is divided into two categories: the “I-Self" and the "Me-Self".
• The "I-Self" refers to the self that knows who he or she is.
• James believed that the "I-Self" is the thinking self.
• The “I-Self” reflects the soul of a person or what is now thought of as the mind and is called the pure ego.
• The "Me-Self" is the empirical self. It refers to describing the person’s personal experiences and further divided into
sub- categories: material self, social self, and spiritual self.
• The material self consists of things that belong to a person such as the body, clothes, house etc.
• The social self refers to whom and how a person acts on social situations.
• The spiritual self refers to the most intimate and important part of the self that includes the person’s purpose, motives,
emotions, values, conscience, and moral behavior.
• James believed that the path to understanding the spiritual self is through introspection.
• Another aspect of self-understanding is self- concept.
• Self-concept refers to the image of oneself.
• Psychologist Carl Rogers defined the self as a flexible and changing perception of personal identity.
• The self develops from interactions with significant people and self-awareness.
• According to Rogers, human beings are always striving for self- fulfillment, or self-actualization.
• When the needs of the self are denied, severe anxiety may result.
• Central to achieving self-actualization is the development of self-concept.
• Roger's suggest that there are two components of self-concept: real self and ideal self.
• Real self consists of all the ideas, including the awareness of ‘what I am’ and ‘what I can do’.
Personality Development
Central to Rogers' personality theory is the notion of self or self-concept. This is defined as "the organized, consistent
set of perceptions and beliefs about oneself."
The self is the humanistic term for who we really are as a person. The self is our inner personality, and can be likened
to the soul, or Freud's psyche. The self is influenced by the experiences a person has in their life, and out
15
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
interpretations of those experiences. Two primary sources that influence our self-concept are childhood experiences
and evaluation by others.
According to Rogers (1959), we want to feel, experience and behave in ways which are consistent with our self-image
and which reflect what we would like to be like, our ideal-self. The closer our self-image and ideal-self are to each
other, the more consistent or congruent we are and the higher our sense of self-worth.
A person is said to be in a state of incongruence if some of the totality of their experience is unacceptable to them
and is denied or distorted in the self-image.
The humanistic approach states that the self is composed of concepts unique to ourselves. The self-concept includes
three components:
Self-worth
Self-worth (or self-esteem) comprises what we think about ourselves. Rogers believed feelings of self-worth
developed in early childhood and were formed from the interaction of the child with the mother and father.
Self-image
How we see ourselves, which is important to good psychological health. Self-image includes the influence of our body
image on inner personality.
At a simple level, we might perceive ourselves as a good or bad person, beautiful or ugly. Self-image affects how a
person thinks, feels and behaves in the world.
Ideal Self
This is the person who we would like to be. It consists of our goals and ambitions in life, and is dynamic – i.e., forever
changing.
The ideal self in childhood is not the ideal self in our teens or late twenties etc.
Carl Rogers (1951) viewed the child as having two basic needs: positive regard from other people and self-worth.
How we think about ourselves, our feelings of self-worth are of fundamental importance both to psychological health
and to the likelihood that we can achieve goals and ambitions in life and achieve self-actualization.
Self-worth may be seen as a continuum from very high to very low. For Carl Rogers (1959) a person who has high
self-worth, that is, has confidence and positive feelings about him or herself, faces challenges in life, accepts failure
and unhappiness at times, and is open with people. A person with low self-worth may avoid challenges in life, not
accept that life can be painful and unhappy at times, and will be defensive and guarded with other people.
Rogers believed feelings of self-worth developed in early childhood and were formed from the interaction of the child
with the mother and father. As a child grows older, interactions with significant others will affect feelings of self-
worth.Rogers believed that we need to be regarded positively by others; we need to feel valued, respected, treated
with affection and loved. Positive regard is to do with how other people evaluate and judge us in social interaction.
Rogers made a distinction between unconditional positive regard and conditional positive regard.
16
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
Unconditional positive regard is where parents, significant others (and the humanist therapist) accepts and loves the
person for what he or she is. Positive regard is not withdrawn if the person does something wrong or makes a mistake.
The consequences of unconditional positive regard are that the person feels free to try things out and make mistakes,
even though this may lead to getting it worse at times.People who are able to self-actualize are more likely to have
received unconditional positive regard from others, especially their parents in childhood.
Conditional positive regard is where positive regard, praise, and approval, depend upon the child, for example,
behaving in ways that the parents think correct. Hence the child is not loved for the person he or she is, but on condition
that he or she behaves only in ways approved by the parent(s). At the extreme, a person who constantly seeks
approval from other people is likely only to have experienced conditional positive regard as a child.
Congruence
A person’s ideal self may not be consistent with what actually happens in life and experiences of the person. Hence, a difference
may exist between a person’s ideal self and actual experience. This is called incongruence.
Where a person’s ideal self and actual experience are consistent or very similar, a state of congruence exists. Rarely, if ever, does
a total state of congruence exist; all people experience a certain amount of incongruence.
The development of congruence is dependent on unconditional positive regard. Carl Rogers believed that for a person to achieve
self-actualization they must be in a state of congruence.
According to Rogers, we want to feel, experience and behave in ways which are consistent with our self-image and which reflect
what we would like to be like, our ideal-self.
The closer our self-image and ideal-self are to each other, the more consistent or congruent we are and the higher our sense of
self-worth. A person is said to be in a state of incongruence if some of the totality of their experience is unacceptable to them and
is denied or distorted in the self-image.
Incongruence is "a discrepancy between the actual experience of the organism and the self-picture of the individual insofar as it
represents that experience.
As we prefer to see ourselves in ways that are consistent with our self-image, we may use defense mechanisms like denial or
repression in order to feel less threatened by some of what we consider to be our undesirable feelings.
A person whose self-concept is incongruent with her or his real feelings and experiences will defend because the truth hurts.
17
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
Psychological Theory How Self is Viewed According to How you view/viewed yourself using the theory
the Theory and a significant event/memory while growing up
18
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
The old man was horrified when he found out. Life had never been good since his daughter lost her hearing when
when she was just two years old. She couldn’t even talk --- just fluttered her hands around trying to tell him things. Over the
years, he had gotten used to that. But now,,, he shuddered at the thought of her being pregnant. No one would be willing to
marry her; he knew that. And the neighbors, their tongues would never stop wagging. Everywhere he went, he could hear
people talking behind his back.
If only his wife were still alive, maybe she could come up with something. What should he do? He couldn’t just kick
his daughter out into the street. After the baby was born, the old man tried to shale his feelings, but they wouldn’t let loose.
Isabelle was a pretty name, but every time he looked at the baby, he felt sick to his stomach. He hated doing it, but there was
no way out. His daughter and her baby would have to live in the attic.
Unfortunately, this is a true story. Isabelle was discovered in Ohio in the 1938 when she was about 6 ½ years old,
living in a dark room with her deaf-mute mother. Isabelle couldn’t talk, but she did use gestures to communicate with her
mother. An inadequate diet and lack of sunshine had given Isabelle a disease called rickets. Her legs were so bowed that
as she stood erect the soles of her shoes came nearly flat together, and she got about with a skittering gait. Her behavior
toward strangers, especially men, was almost that of a wild animal, manifesting much fear and hostility. In lieu of speech she
made only a strange croaking sound. People first thought that Isabelle was mentally impaired because she scored practically
zero on an intelligence test. But after a few months of intensive language training, Isabelle was able to speak in short
sentences. In about a year, she could write a few words, do simple addition, and retell stories after hearing them. Seven
months later, she had a vocabulary of almost 2,000 words. It took only two years for Isabelle to reach the intellectual level
that is normal for her age. She then went on to school where she was “bright, cheerful, energetic… and participated in all
school activities as normally as other children.”
A. There has been and continues to be considerable debate over whether “nature” (heredity) or “nurture” (social
environment) most determines human behavior. Studies of feral, isolated, and institutionalized children indicate that although
heredity certainly plays a role in the “human equation,” it is society that makes people “human.” People learn what it means
to be and, consequently, become members of the human community through language, social interaction, and other forms of
human contact.
1.Feral (wild) children have occasionally been found: children living in the woods who may have been raised by
wild animals. These stories lead one to wonder what humans would be like if left untouched by society.
2. Isolated children show what humans might be like if secluded from society at an early age. Isabelle’s story cited
in this lesson is an example. Although initially believed to be retarded, a surprising thing happened when she was
given intensive language training. She began to acquire language and in only two years she had reached the
normal intellectual level for her age. Without language there can be no culture or shared way of living.
19
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
3. Institutionalized children show that traits such as intelligence, cooperative behavior, and friendliness are the
result of early close relations with other humans. Research with children reared in orphanages and cases like
Genie—the 13½-year-old who had been kept locked in a small room for years—demonstrates the importance of
early interaction for human development.
B. The Harlow’s studies of monkeys reared in isolation have reached similar results. They concluded that if isolated
for that longer than six months, the more difficult adjustment becomes.
C. Babies do not “naturally” develop into human adults; although their bodies grow, human interaction is required for
them to acquire the traits we consider normal for human beings. The process by which we learn the ways of our
society, through interaction with others, is socialization.
A. People are not born with an intrinsic knowledge of themselves or others. Rather, as the theoretical insights of Charles
Horton Cooley, George Herbert Mead, Jean Piaget, Lawrence Kohlberg, and Carol Gilligan demonstrate, they develop
reasoning skills, morality, personality, and a sense of self through social observation, contact, and interaction.
1. Charles H. Cooley (1864-1929) concluded that human development is socially created—that our sense of self
develops from interaction with others. He coined the term “looking glass self” to describe this process.
B. George H. Mead (1863-1931) agreed with Cooley but added that play is critical to the development of a self. In play,
we learn to take the role of others—to understand and anticipate how others feel and think.
1. Mead concluded that children are first able to take only the role of significant others (parents or siblings, for
example); as the self develops, children internalize the expectations of other people, and eventually the entire group.
Mead referred to the norms, values, attitudes, and expectations of people “in general” as the generalized other.
2. According to Mead, the development of the self goes through stages: (1) imitation (children initially can only mimic
the gestures and words of others); (2) play (beginning at age three, children play the roles of specific people, such as
a firefighter or the Lone Ranger); and (3) games (in the first years of school, children become involved in organized
team games and must learn the role of each member of the team).
20
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
21
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
The word, mahal. in Filipino, the word can mean both “love” and “expensive.” In our language, love is intimately
bound with value, with being expensive, being precious. Something expensive is valuable. Someone whom we love
is valuable to us.
Our language is also gender-neutral. In English, Spanish, and other languages, the distinction is clear between a
third person male and third person female pronoun. He and she; el and ella. In Filipino, it is plain, “siya.”
In these varied examples, we have seen how language has something to do with culture. It is a salient part of culture
and ultimately, has a tremendous effect in our crafting of the self. This might also be one of the reasons why cultural
divide spells out differences in how one regard oneself.
Self in Families
Apart from the anthropological and psychological basis for the relationship between the self and the social world, the
sociological likewise struggled to understand the real connection between the two concepts. In doing so, sociologists focus
on the different institutions and powers at play in the society. Among these, the most prominent is the family.
While every child is born with certain givenness, disposition coming from his parents’ genes and general conditions
of life, the impact of one’s family is still deemed as a given in understanding the self. The kind of family that we are
born in, the resources available to us (human, spiritual, economic), and the kind of development that we will have
certainly affect us as we go through life.
Human persons learn the ways of living and therefore their selfhood by being in a family. It is what a family initiates
a person to become that serves as the basis for this person’s progress. Babies internalize ways and styles that they
observe from their family. The same is true for ways of behaving. Notice how kids reared in a respectful environment
becomes respectful. as well.
22
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
Without a family, biologically and sociologically, a person may not even survive or become a human person.
Gender and the Self
Another important aspect of the self is gender. Gender is one of those loci of the self that is subject to alternation,
change, and development.. One maneuvers into the society and identifies himself as who he is by also taking note
of gender identities. A wonderful anecdote about Leo Tolstoy’s wife that can solidify this point is narrated below:
Sonia Tolstoy, the wife of the famous Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy, wrote when she was twenty-
one, “I am nothing but a miserable crushed worm, whom no one wants, whom no one loves, a
useless creature with morning sickness, and a big belly, two rotten teeth, and a bad temper, a
battered sense of dignity, and a love which nobody wants and which nearly drives me insane, “A
few years later she wrote, “It makes me laugh to read over this diary. It’s so full of contradictions,
and one would think that I was such as unhappy woman. Yet is there a happier woman than I?”
(Tolstoy 1975)
This account illustrates that our gender partly determines how we see ourselves in the world. Oftentimes, society
forces a particular identity unto us depending on our sex and/or gender. In the Philippines, husbands for the most
part are expected to provide for the family. The eldest man in a family is expected to head the family and hold it in.
Slight modifications have been on the way due to feminism and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)
activism but for the most part, patriarchy has remained to be at work.
Nancy Chodorow, a feminist, argues that because mothers take the role of taking care of children, there is a
tendency for girls to imitate the same and reproduce the same kind of mentality of women as care providers in the
family.
Men on the other hand, in the periphery of their own family, are taught early on how to behave like a man. This
normally includes holding in one’s emotion, being tough, fatalistic, not to worry about danger, and admiration for
hard physical labor.
The gendered self is then shaped within a particular context of time and space. The sense of self that is being
taught makes sure that an individual fits in a particular environment. This is dangerous and detrimental in the goal
of truly finding one’s self, self-determination, and growth of the self. Gender has to be personally discovered and
asserted and not dictated by culture and the society.
Activity 7. Essay.
Answer the essay questions that follow. Answer very briefly
and in a concise manner.
Remember the lessons learned in sociological and
anthropological perspectives of the self as you answer.
Activity 7. Essay Questions: Write your answers in a separate sheet. Answer very briefly and concise. (25 points)
23
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
References:
Brawner, Daisy G. et al (2018). Understanding the self. C & E Publishing, Inc 839 EDSA, South Triangle,
Quezon City
Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. In Pervin and John (eds) Handbook of Personality
Theory and Research. 2 nd ed. Guilford Press 134 — 194.
Chafee, J. (2013) Who are you? Consciousness, Identity and the Self. fn the Philosopher's Way: Thinking
Critically about Profound Ideas. Pearson. 106 — 169.
Demetrio, Fernando & Zialcita. (1991). The soul, 95-97, One is not enough. 99-101. The Soul Book. GCF Books.
Henslin, J.M. Essentials of Sociology. A Down-to-Earth Approach 6th Edition. Pearson. USA.
Macayan, Jonathan V. et al (2018). Understanding the self. C & E Publishing, Inc 839 EDSA, South Triangle,
Quezon City
Taag. Gregorio C. et. al (2018). Understanding the Self/ IPM Publising House. Bulacan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V73hdaSTzWg
Psychoanalytic Theory by Sigmund Freud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYCBdZLCDBQ
Psychosocial Development by Erikson
24
Benguet State University
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Social Sciences
MODULE 2 FDDavid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt3-PIC2nCs
Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRF27F2bn-A
Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bounwXLkme4
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development
25