Practicalresearch111 q1 Mod2 JdRivero
Practicalresearch111 q1 Mod2 JdRivero
Practicalresearch111 q1 Mod2 JdRivero
Quarter 1 – Module 2:
Characteristics, Processes and
Ethics of Research
Practical Research 1 – Grade 11
Alternative Delivery Mode
Quarter 1 – Module 2: Characteristics, Processes and Ethics of Research
First Edition, 2020
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office
wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such
agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from their
respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim ownership
over them.
Management Team:
Schools Division Superintendent : Romeo M. Alip, PhD, CESO V
OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent : William Roderick R. Fallorin
Chief Education Supervisor, CID : Milagros M. Peñaflor, PhD
Education Program Supervisor, LRMDS : Edgar E. Garcia, MITE
Education Program Supervisor, AP/ADM : Romeo M. Layug
Education Program Supervisor, English : Ilynne SJ. Samonte
District Supervisor,Limay : Elma P. Dizon
Division Lead Book Designer : Jenelyn D. Rivero
District LRMDS Coordinator, SHS : Melbourne L. Salonga
School LRMDS Coordinator : Karl Angelo R. Tabernero
School Principal : Marijoy B. Mendoza, EdD
District Lead Layout Artist :
District Lead Illustrator :
District Lead Evaluator :
This learning resource hopes to engage the learners into guided and
independent learning activities at their own pace and time. Furthermore, this also
aims to help learners acquire the needed 21st century skills while taking into
consideration their needs and circumstances.
In addition to the material in the main text, you will also see this box in the
body of the module:
As a facilitator you are expected to orient the learners on how to use this
module. You also need to keep track of the learners' progress while allowing them to
manage their own learning. Furthermore, you are expected to encourage and assist
the learners as they do the tasks included in the module.
ii
For the learner:
The hand is one of the most symbolized part of the human body. It is often
used to depict skill, action and purpose. Through our hands we may learn, create
and accomplish. Hence, the hand in this learning resource signifies that you as a
learner is capable and empowered to successfully achieve the relevant competencies
and skills at your own pace and time. Your academic success lies in your own hands!
This module was designed to provide you with fun and meaningful
opportunities for guided and independent learning at your own pace and time. You
will be enabled to process the contents of the learning resource while being an active
learner.
What I Need to Know This will give you an idea of the skills or
competencies you are expected to learn in the
module.
iii
Assessment This is a task which aims to evaluate your
level of mastery in achieving the learning
competency.
1. Use the module with care. Do not put unnecessary mark/s on any part of the
module. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises.
2. Don’t forget to answer What I Know before moving on to the other activities
included in the module.
3. Read the instruction carefully before doing each task.
4. Observe honesty and integrity in doing the tasks and checking your answers.
5. Finish the task at hand before proceeding to the next.
6. Return this module to your teacher/facilitator once you are through with it.
If you encounter any difficulty in answering the tasks in this module, do not
hesitate to consult your teacher or facilitator. Always bear in mind that you are
not alone.
We hope that through this material, you will experience meaningful learning
and gain deep understanding of the relevant competencies. You can do it!
iv
What I Need to Know
At the end of this module, you are expected to learn the following
competencies:
1. describe the characteristics of research (CS_RS11IIIa-3);
2. illustrate the processes of research (CS_RS11IIIa-3); and
3. define ethics in research (CS_RS11IIIa-3).
What I Know
Read and analyze the following statements carefully. Write FACT if you think
the statement is correct, and BLUFF if incorrect.
__________ 1. Research should be empirical.
__________ 4. Any unusual phenomenon may happen and can turn into a potential
problem.
__________ 5. The choice of variables does not affect the clarity of research.
1
__________ 11. Ethic promotes the pursuit of deceit, knowledge, and credibility.
__________ 12. Human subject protection is the most important ethical consideration
in conducting a research.
__________ 13. A researcher must always adhere to the ethical codes and policies of
research.
__________ 15. Proper acknowledgment should only be given to chosen authors cited
and sources used in research.
Lesson
1 Characteristics of Research
In the previous lessons, you were oriented with the definition of research along
with its importance in daily life. Aside from them, you also need to know the
characteristics of research because they will guide you in crafting your own.
What’s In
1. E S M T S A C T Y I
2. E O C V J T E B I
2
3. S F A E I L E B
4. C E P A I R L I M
5. A R C E L
What’s New
As a senior high school student, you are required to study a few research
subjects and conduct a research either individually or collaboratively. But, do you
know how to make a good one? Well, this module will surely help you to achieve your
goal.
In this lesson, you will be oriented about the five basic characteristics of
research (Cristobal & Cristobal 2017). There may be a lot of characteristics stated by
other authors in other references but let us only focus on the following characteristics
rooted from the given definitions of research in the previous module.
3
What is It
4
What’s More
Research
What I Can Do
2. The researcher does not follow the standard format in writing the research
paper.
-
5
3. The researcher relies on the opinion of other researchers.
-
Assessment
Additional Activities
Choose one among the five characteristics of research and explain how you
can apply it in writing your own research. Express your answer in at least five
sentences.
systematic objective feasible
empirical clear
6
Lesson
In the previous lesson, you were oriented with the basic characteristics of
research. At this time, you also need to know the process of research because it will
help you in properly conducting your own study.
Let me remind you that process refers to a series of steps or actions taken to
achieve a particular end or goal.
What’s In
Can you help the researcher get out of the maze to achieve his goal?
7
Great! What you have just done can be compared to the process of research. It
takes you to the correct direction to finish your study and achieve your goal.
What’s New
What is It
Study the following sample that illustrates how research can be conducted
through the five phases of the research process (Blankenship, 2010):
8
In the conceptual phase, the researcher identifies childhood obesity as a local
problem and concern within the community. He/she reviews previous studies
conducted about it and discovers statistics related to the long-term effects of the said
problem in terms of health issues, death rates, and projected medical costs. He/she
also finds several articles and information from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention that describe the benefits of walking 10,000 steps a day. Based on the
literature review, he/she hypothesizes that walking may help in combating obesity.
He/she conceptualizes obesity as the research problem and purports to determine if
walking 10,000 steps a day for three days a week will improve the individual's health.
In the design and planning phase, the researcher decides to use experimental
design in the study. He/she develops the plan for the walking program indicating
what data will be collected, when and how the data will be collected, who will collect
the data, and how the data will be analyzed. The instrumentation plan presents all
the steps that must be taken for the study to be completed. From the identified
population of children aged 10-12 years old, the researcher randomly selects sample
to participate in a walking program for six months.
In the empirical phase, the researcher collects data through the use of survey,
questionnaire, and observation. He/she measures the defined variables like weight,
percentage of body fat, cholesterol levels, and the number of days the child walked a
total of 10,000 steps during the class. The researcher gathers these data twice: at
the first session and at the last session of the program.
In the analytic phase, the researcher examines the data by comparing the
measurements of weight, percentage of body fat, and cholesterol that were taken at
the first meeting of the subjects to the measurements of the same variables at the
final program session. These two sets of data will be analyzed to determine if there
is a difference between the two measurements for each child who participated in the
program. Then, the researcher interprets the results and makes conclusions related
to the research question posed.
Now, study the following schematic diagram which illustrates the simplified
flow of the significant steps you need to take in conducting a study presented by Rao
9
(2017).
Prepare Interpret
Define the
Review the Formulate the Collect Analyze and report
research
literature hypothesis research data data the
problem
design findings
What’s More
Arrange the following steps to illustrate the research process. Use one to seven
(1-7) to indicate the correct chronological order.
4. Analyze data
6. Collect data
7. Formulate hypothesis
10
What I Have Learned
What I Can Do
Think of a topic that you’d like to research about. Then, compose a short
narrative essay describing the chronological steps you will take in conducting your
study. Be guided with the given rubric below.
11
Rubric for Assessing an Essay
VGE GE SE LE N
CRITERIA
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. The essay demonstrates an understanding of the
research process.
2. The essay descriptively narrates the
chronological steps in conducting a study based
on the chosen topic.
3. The essay follows the correct format.
4. The essay is written coherently and cohesively.
5. The word choice is appropriate.
6. The essay is free from grammatical errors.
TOTAL
OVERALL SCORE /30
Legend:
VGE – To a very great extent
GE – To a great extent
SE – To some extent
LE – To a little extent
N – Not at all
Assessment
Categorize the following steps in which phase of the research process they
belong to. Use the legend below for your answer.
A – Conceptual Phase D – Analytic Phase
B – Design and Planning Phase E – Dissemination Phase
C – Empirical Phase
12
__________ 11. Formulating hypothesis
__________ 12. Reviewing the literature
__________ 13. Preparing data for analysis
__________ 14. Utilizing findings
__________ 15. Determining the sampling and data collection plan
Additional Activities
Which do you think among the five phases of the research process can be done
easily? Choose one from the box and justify your answer.
Lesson
3 Ethics in Research
In the previous lessons, you were oriented with the characteristics of research
and the research process. Aside from them, you also need to know the importance of
ethics because it will guide you in considering the ethical codes and policies you have
to follow in writing and conducting a research.
Let me remind you that ethics is a branch of knowledge that deals with moral
principles on governing a person’s behavior in the conduct of any activity.
14
What’s In
Search for and encircle the following terms in the word puzzle below.
1. Honesty 6. Respect
2. Objectivity 7. Confidentiality
3. Integrity 8. Responsibility
4. Care 9. Competence
5. Openness 10. Legality
What’s New
Read and analyze the following article comprehensively. This will serve as an
eye-opener for you to realize the importance of ethics in research.
15
Thousands of Indians die in unethical clinical trials
(Subramanian, 2018)
Thousands of Indians have died in unethical clinical trials over the past decade,
even as a lawsuit to improve regulation of these trials has dragged unresolved
through the Supreme Court for six years.
Between January 2005 and November 2017, 4,967 people died during the
course of drug trials and research, according to government data obtained by a non-
profit called Swasthya Adhikar Manch (SAM). Another 20,000 odd people have
suffered adverse reactions in such trials.
Pharmaceutical companies have offered compensation to the families of the
deceased only in 187 of these cases, said Amulya Nidhi, who founded SAM. At least
475 drugs have been tested in trials during this time, according to Sanjay Parikh,
the lawyer representing SAM in the lawsuit it filed against the government in 2012.
The trials take advantage of loopholes in rules, loose oversight, and India’s large
population of poor people who are often unaware of their rights as trial subjects, Mr.
Nidhi said. “We need a strong regulatory system, and we need action on violators.”
The number of clinical trials in India rose after 2005, when India relaxed its
testing laws. Drug companies began to recruit clinical research outsourcing firms to
conduct trials in India, where costs are drastically lower.
The annual revenue of these outsourcing firms has grown from $485 million in
2010-11 to over $1 billion today, according to research from Frost & Sullivan, a
market consultancy.
India’s regulators have been unable to keep up with this explosion of testing.
For instance, Mr. Nidhi said, an ethics committee is supposed to oversee every trial.
“At one point, in Chandigarh, there were 257 trials going on, but only one ethics
committee overseeing them,” he said. “How is that even possible?”
Trials take place under the radar as well, Mr. Parikh said, sometimes by simply
paying poor subjects around 500 rupees a day and enlisting them. The details of the
trials and the data harvested remain with the companies. “There’s no way to find this
stuff out.”
In 2013, following an interim order from the Supreme Court, the government
made it mandatory for companies to seek written informed consent from each subject
before a trial, and for the process of seeking this consent to be recorded on video.
In reality, however, this rarely happens. What is more commonplace, Mr. Nidhi
said, is the kind of experience Pradeep Gehlot had. His story, as narrated to SAM,
forms part of the non-profit’s case in court.
Mr. Gehlot drives an auto rickshaw in the city of Indore, and when his father
Srikrishna, a tailor, fell ill with breathlessness and chest pain, he admitted him to a
government hospital.
In the hospital, Mr. Gehlot was given a sheaf of papers to sign. They were in
English, which he couldn’t read very well, but the doctors told him that his father
would be treated, free of charge, with imported drugs, so Mr. Gehlot went ahead and
signed.
“Without his consent, Srikrishna was in a clinical trial for nearly two years,”
Mr. Nidhi said. “His health started deteriorating, and he died in 2012.”
When SAM heard about the case and sent a team to talk to Mr. Gehlot, they
confirmed from the documents that a trial had been conducted.
After Mr. Gehlot complained, the doctor’s medical license was suspended for
three months. SAM uncovered other cases of ethical violations in a different Indore
hospital and filed further complaints.
The state government, after investigating the hospital, found that 81 “serious
adverse events”—including 32 deaths—occurred during clinical trials on more than
3,000 people. These adverse events had not previously been reported to regulators.
A third Indore hospital enlisted 1,833 children and 233 mentally ill individuals in
trials without their consent, the investigators’ report found.
The report also suggested that doctors and clinicians running these trials had
frequently been sent on trips overseas, or had been paid out of process, by
pharmaceutical companies.
Punitive measures are weak, however. After its inquiry, the government
imposed fines of $100 apiece on 12 doctors for not cooperating with its investigations.
Two doctors were barred from conducting further trials for a period of six months.
But Chirag Trivedi, the president of the Indian Society for Clinical Research, a
professional body representing pharmaceutical researchers, argued that the
country’s rules are actually over-stringent, and that they have shrunk the number
of ongoing trials.
One regulation, for example, calls for companies to also pay for management of
all medical problems during trials, which is unfair, he said.
“There was a cardiovascular drug trial, which is for a heart ailment, where the
company had to pay for tuberculosis treatment for nine months,” Mr. Trivedi said.
“We all know that tuberculosis is caused by bacteria, not by any drug, and not by a
clinical trial for a heart ailment.”
In every case that has warranted compensation, companies have paid out, he
said. Mr. Trivedi admitted that, “as in any industry,” there were companies that
indulged in unethical trials as well. “We cannot condone any irregularities,” he said.
“Whatever protects the rights and safety of individuals, we will support such that.
Every life is precious. We can’t treat Indians as guinea pigs.”
He also pointed out that clinical trials are vital to drug development. “The
medicines that help you and me—they wouldn’t be available without trials.”
The next hearing of SAM’s lawsuit in the Supreme Court has been scheduled
for December 4, but all parties to the suit have been asked to file their suggestions
for an amended law next month, Mr. Nidhi said.
But the regulations before 2005 were both sufficient and comprehensive, Mr.
Nidhi said. “Bring back the law that existed before 2005. That is what we are asking.”
What is It
What’s More
At this point, you already learned a lot about ethics in research. Now, can you
recall the importance of ethical codes and policies?
What should you consider most among the different ethical codes and policies
when conducting a study? Why do you think so?
What I Can Do
Assessment
Identify whether the following actions follow the ethical codes and policies for
research. Write GO if you think it is ethical, and STOP if it is unethical.
Additional Activities
Pick one from the rights of research participants inside the box. Then, explain
how you can personally apply it in conducting your own research in the future.
Express your ideas in at least five sentences.
References
Blankenship, Diane C. 2010. Applied Research and Evaluation Methods in Creation.
Maryland: Human Kinetics.
Coffee. 2018. "I Am A Student Icon." Pixabay. March. Accessed July 2020.
https://pixabay.com/illustrations/documents-files-i-am-a-student-icon-
3229416/.
Cristobal, Amadeo Jr. P, and Maura Consolacion D Cristobal. 2017. Practical
Research 1 for Senior High School. Quezon City: C&E Publishing, Inc.