Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 110 views

    Example Decision Matrix

    Uploaded by

    doboj
    The document summarizes a decision analysis for a WAN network design. Six potential solutions were considered and evaluated based on six factors. The best solution was determined to be direct connectivity with integrated internet. This option scored highest based on factors like resiliance, standard compliance, and meeting requirements. A solution using direct connectivity with segmented internet was rejected for failing to meet the resiliance requirement.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Example Decision Matrix

    Uploaded by

    doboj
    110 views4 pages
    The document summarizes a decision analysis for a WAN network design. Six potential solutions were considered and evaluated based on six factors. The best solution was determined to be direct connectivity with integrated internet. This option scored highest based on factors like resiliance, standard compliance, and meeting requirements. A solution using direct connectivity with segmented internet was rejected for failing to meet the resiliance requirement.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes a decision analysis for a WAN network design. Six potential solutions were considered and evaluated based on six factors. The best solution was determined to be direct connectivity with integrated internet. This option scored highest based on factors like resiliance, standard compliance, and meeting requirements. A solution using direct connectivity with segmented internet was rejected for failing to meet the resiliance requirement.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    110 views4 pages

    Example Decision Matrix

    Uploaded by

    doboj
    The document summarizes a decision analysis for a WAN network design. Six potential solutions were considered and evaluated based on six factors. The best solution was determined to be direct connectivity with integrated internet. This option scored highest based on factors like resiliance, standard compliance, and meeting requirements. A solution using direct connectivity with segmented internet was rejected for failing to meet the resiliance requirement.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    WAN Network Design

    Executive Summary
    The decision, WAN Network Design, was examined in full detail. As a result, Direct Connectivity w/ integrated internet was determined to be the best solution. In this decision, 6 possible solutions and 6 factors were examined.
    In this decision, 4 Perspective(s): were considered: Author Mike Alan Janine This report addresses Perspective: Author

    Perspective: Author The quality of any decision depends on the quality of the choices and factors being considered. Here are the 6 choices considered in this decision listed in ranked order for this Perspective:. Direct Connectivity w/ integrated internet CITRIX via intranet w/ crazy phone options Lan-to-Lan VPN w/ integrated internet CITRIX via internet w/ direct phone Lan to Lan VPN w/ segmented internet Direct connectivity w/ segmented internet Here, in the order of their priority, are the 6 factors considered in the decision for this Perspective:. Resiliance Standard Meets Requirements Stability Design Simplicity/Managability Cost Choice Direct connectivity w/ segmented internet failed because it did not meet the requirements for factor Resiliance.

    Detailed Choice Analysis


    Below is a table of the ratings each choice received for each factor. The first column lists a factor. The second column shows the current rating for that factor. The third column show the value required to promote the choice one step toward the top choice. The fourth column shows the value required to lower the choice one step toward the last choice. If no value is listed in the third or fourth column it indicates that no change in the rating on this factor alone will not promote or demote the choice in the final list.
    Direct Connectivity w/ integrated internet Resiliance 80 Standard 0 Meets Requirements 0 Stability 0 Design Simplicity/Managability 3 Cost 2 Current N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Promote N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Demote

    CITRIX via intranet w/ crazy phone options Resiliance 75 Standard 0 Meets Requirements 0 Stability 0 Design Simplicity/Managability 3 Cost 3 Lan-to-Lan VPN w/ integrated internet Resiliance 55 Standard 0 Meets Requirements 0 Stability 0 Design Simplicity/Managability 3 Cost 4 CITRIX via internet w/ direct phone Resiliance 48 Standard 0 Meets Requirements 0 Stability 0 Design Simplicity/Managability 3 Cost 2 Lan to Lan VPN w/ segmented internet Resiliance 0 Standard 0 Meets Requirements 0 Stability 0 Design Simplicity/Managability 3 Cost 4 Direct connectivity w/ segmented internet Resiliance (1) Standard 0 Meets Requirements 0 Stability 0 Design Simplicity/Managability 3 Cost 2

    Current N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current N/A 1 1 1 N/A N/A

    Promote N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Promote N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Promote N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Promote N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Promote N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

    Demote

    Demote

    Demote

    Demote

    Demote

    Decision Table
    This table displays each choice and factor considered in the decision. The factors are listed along the top with the most important factors on the left and the least important on the right. The choices are listed in the left column. The choices are in descending order of their cumulative score. Choices that failed any criteria are listed on the bottom of the table.

    W A N N e t w o rk D e s ig n A u th o r

    F a c t o rs a n d R a n k in g s : R e s ilia n c e S t a n d a rd M e e t s R e q u ire m e n t s S t a b ilit y D e s ig n S im p lic it y / M a n a g a b ilit y Cost C h o ic e s : wn D i r e c t C o n n e c t i vi t y w / i n t e g r a t e U n n tneor n e t N o t R a t e d d ik U e no i C IT R IX vi a i n t r a n e t w / c r a z y p h o n n k o p twonn s N o t R a t e d U er no L a n - t o - L a n V P N w / i n t e g r a t e d i n t n k n e tw n U e C IT R IX vi a i n t e r n e t w / d i r e c t p h o n n k n o w n N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d N o t R a te d G ood G ood G ood G ood G ood G ood F a ir G ood E x c e lle n t F a ir E x c e lle n t F a ir T o t a ls : U nknown U nknown U nknown U nknown P oor F a il

    o r a e L a n t o L a n V P N w / s e g m e n t e d Ni n tt e Rn et t d N o t R a t e d D i r e c t c o n n e c t i vi t y w / s e g m e n t e d Fnat el r n e t N o t R a t e d i i

    Decision Graph
    WAN Network Design Author

    Direct connectivity w/ segmented internet Lan to Lan VPN w/ segmented internet CITRIX via internet w/ direct phone Lan-to-Lan VPN w/ integrated internet CITRIX via intranet w/ crazy phone options Direct Connectivity w/ integrated internet 0 100 200 300 400 500 Resiliance Standard Meets Requirements Stability Design Simplicity/Managability Cost

    You might also like