Translating into English

‫ث‪٤‬بٗبد أٍبٍ‪٤‬خ‬
‫ث‪٤‬بٗبد‬

‫الكلية‪ :‬اُزوث‪٤‬خ‬

‫الشعبة‪ :‬أٍبٍ‪٢‬‬

‫قسن‪ :‬اُِـخ اإلٗغِ‪٤‬ي‪٣‬خ‬

‫الفرقة‪ :‬اُضبٗ‪٤‬خ‬

‫أستاذ الوقرر‪ :‬ك‪.‬ئٍواء ٓؾٔل ٍؼ‪٤‬ل‬

‫العام الجاهعي‪2024/2023 :‬‬

 Table of Content

1. Introduction.
2. What is Translation?
3. What Do We Translate?
4.How Do We Translation?
4.1. Methods of Translation
4.1.1.Literal Translation
4.1.1.1.One-to-one Literal Translation of Words: Word-
for-word Translation
4.1.1.2.One-to-one Literal Translation
4.1.1.3.Literal Translation of Meaning: Direct Translation
4.1.2.Free Translation
5. Translation Problems
6. References
 INTRODUCTION

1. What is Translation?

As a subject, translation generally refers to all the processes and methods used
to render and / or transfer the meaning of the source language text into the target
language as closely, completely and accurately as possible, using: (1)
words/phrases which already have a direct equivalent in Arabic language; (2) new
words or terms for which no ready-made equivalents are available in Arabic; (3)
foreign words or terms written in Arabic letters as pronounced in their native
origin; and (4) foreign words or terms made to fit Arabic pronunciation, spelling
and grammar. Here are examples to illustrate these four types respectively:

1. „speak‟ )ٌِْ‫ز‬٣(

2. „satellite‟ )٢‫(هٔو إط٘بػ‬

3. „aspirin‟ )ٖ٣‫و‬٤‫(أٍج‬

4. „democracy‟ )‫خ‬٤ٛ‫ٔووا‬٣‫(ك‬

(More examples and illustrations are given throughout the forthcoming chapters).

Now, when we translate, what do we translate? Grammar, words, style or/and

sounds, or something else? The following point answers this question.
2. What Do We Translate?

We translate neither grammar, words, style nor sounds. What do we translate

then? We always translate one thing only: MEANING. What is meaning? It is a
big question that is difficult to answer easily, directly, exhaustively and decisively.
However, a general, satisfactory and simple answer can be given here. Meaning is
a complicated network of language components comprised of: Syntax (grammar),
Vocabulary (words), Style, and Phonology (sounds). Each of these components
includes several points, shown in Figure 1:

LANGUAGE COMPONENTS

GRAMMAR VOCABULARY STYLE PHONOLOGY

1.sentences 1.synonymy 1.formality vs. 1.rhyme

2.clauses 2.polysemy informality 2.rhythm

3.word order 3.antonymy 2.fronting 3.alliteration

4.tenses 4.connotations 3.parallelism 4.consonance

5.modals 5.collocations 4.ambiguity 5.assonance

6.questions 6.idioms 5.repetition 6.metre

7.negation 7.proverbs 6.redundancy 7.foot

8.imperatives 8.metaphors 7.short/long 8.chiming

9.adjectives 9.technical terms: sentencing 9.stress

10.adverbs Arabization 8.irony 10.pitch

11.articles 10.proper names 9.punctuation 11.tone

 12.sentence 11.institutional terms 10.nominalization etc.

connectors 12.culture vs. verbalization

etc. etc. etc.

(Fig. 1)

Thus, meaning is the product of the different components of language taken

together, occurring in a certain type of text and context, and directed to a certain
kind of readership.

In translation, although we do not translate, say, English grammar into Arabic,

we account for its role in shaping meaning, making it either easier or more difficult
to understand and, hence, translate. The same can be said of other language
components. We are always interested in how they combine, produce, influence,
reflect and crystallize meaning.

Hence, with few exceptions, we translate meaning, nothing else but meaning.
This means that anything not relevant to meaning is usually disregarded in
translation (except for certain texts like poetry where sound/prosodic features are
sometimes more important than meaning). On the other hand, meaning is not the
product of words only -as many would wrongly think - but also of grammar, style
and sounds. Figure 2 illustrates the relationship between meaning, language,
language components and translation (it can be read both ways, top-bottom and
bottom-up):
 LANGUAGE

GRAMMAR WORDS STYLE SOUNDS

MEANING

TRANSLATION

(Fig. 2)

Having identified what we translate, the next point is to consider the way we
translate (or how we translate).

4. How Do We Translate?

This question implies two major points: (1) Methods of Translation and (2)
The Process of Translation.

4.1. Methods of Translation

 A method of translation can be defined as 'the way we translate', whether we
translate literally or freely, the words or the meaning, the form or the content, the
letter or the spirit, the manner or the matter, the form or the message, the direct
meaning or the implied meaning, in context or out of context, and so on (see also
Newmark, 1988: 45). Writers on translation have suggested different methods
based on the two major old-new methods of translation, LITERAL and FREE.
Among these are:

1. Literal vs. free translation (Newmark, 1981 & 1988)

2. Semantic vs. communicative translation (Newmark, op. cit.)

3. Formal correspondence vs. textual equivalence (Catford, 1965)

4. Formal equivalence vs. dynamic translation (Nida, 1964, Nida &Taber,

1969)

5. Non-pragmatic vs. pragmatic translation (Bell, 1991; Hatim&Mason, 1990

&1997, Baker, 1998; Snell-Hornby, 1988; and others).

6. Non-creative vs. creative translation (Beylard-Ozeroff and others, 1998).

7. Non-idiomatic vs. idiomatic translation (Newmark, 1988).

Perhaps there is no need to elaborate with details about these pairs of

methods. Suffice it to point out that the first pair, „literal vs. free translation‟
explains more or less the remaining pairs in general terms. As a matter of fact, the
argument of today about the methods of translation is not very much different in
essence from the age-old debate about literal and free translation methods, as
Newmark (op. cit.) also declares: "The central problem of translating has always
been whether to translate literally or freely". Thus, by discussing these two
methods, we may understand the main lines of argument about translation methods
from a new angle.
4.1.1 Literal Translation:

Literal translation method is understood and applied in three different ways,

which can be summarized and exemplified as follows (see also Newmark, 1988:
69, who distinguishes between three similar methods of literal translation):

4.1.1.1. Word-for-word Translation: Literal Translation of Words:

Each English word is translated into an equivalent word in Arabic which is

kept the same as, and in line with that of English: e.g.
a. That child is intelligent

‫ماى‬ َ‫اُطل‬ ٌٕٞ٣ ٢ً‫م‬

)ً‫ب‬٤ً‫ٕ م‬ٌٞ٣ َ‫(ماى اُطل‬

b. Mary wanted to take tea

١‫ٓبه‬ ‫أهاكد‬ ٕ‫أ‬ ‫رأفن‬ ١‫ّب‬

)١‫ أهاكد إٔ رأفن ّب‬١‫(ٓبه‬

c. He is living from hand to mouth

ٞٛ ٌٕٞ٣ ً ‫ػبئْب‬ ٖٓ ‫ل‬٣ ٠ُ‫ئ‬ ْ‫ك‬

)ْ‫ اُل‬٠ُ‫ل ئ‬٤ُ‫ٕ ػبئْب ً ٖٓ ا‬ٌٞ٣ ٞٛ(

d. Please, stay with me on the campus

‫ِي‬ٚ‫ٖٓ ك‬ ‫اثن‬ ٢‫ٓؼ‬ ٠ِ‫ػ‬ ٢‫اُؾوّ اُغبٓؼ‬

)٢‫ اُؾوّ اُغبٓؼ‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬٢‫ِي اثن ٓؼ‬ٚ‫(ٖٓ ك‬

e. Stop beating about the bush

‫هق‬ٝ‫أ‬ ‫وة‬ُٚ‫ا‬ ٍٞ‫ؽ‬ ‫وح‬٤‫اُْغ‬

)‫وح‬٤‫ٍ اُْغ‬ٞ‫وة ؽ‬ُٚ‫هق ا‬ٝ‫(أ‬

f. This man is a big shot

‫نا‬ٛ َ‫اُوع‬ ٌٕٞ٣ ‫وح‬٤‫ًج‬ ‫خ‬٤ٓ‫ه‬

 )‫خ‬٤ٓ‫وح ه‬٤‫نا اُوعَ ًج‬ٛ(

g. I know this information

‫أٗب‬ ‫أػوف‬ ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ‫ٓخ‬ِٞ‫أُؼ‬

)‫ٓخ‬ِٞ‫ أُؼ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ‫(أٗب أػوف‬

This method regards translation to be a translation of individual words. All we

have to do is find the equivalent word in Arabic for the English word, regardless of
differences in grammar, word order, context or special use. Moreover, the whole
concentration is on the source language, whereas the target language should
follow, imitate and mirror it blindly, perfectly and precisely, neither more nor less.
Thus, it seems an easy, straightforward way of translation, which makes it common
among students in particular.

In fact, this method is risky as it may disrupt meaning and, hence, translation,
for a number of reasons, some of which are:

(1) It ignores the Target Language completely, making it subject to the Source
Language wholly and entirely.

(2) It disregards the grammatical differences between the two languages which
belong to two sometimes sharply different language families. That is, English is
an Indo-European, West Germanic language, whereas Arabic is Semitic.

(3) It transfers the SL grammar and word order (Newmark, 1988: 69). It does not
acknowledge the different word order(s) of the two languages.

(4) It has no respect for the context of words in language and allows for words to
be understood in isolation, not in combination with other surrounding words.

(5) It transfers the primary (or common) meanings of words (Newmark, op.cit.:
69). By this, it dismisses the possibility of any polysemous, special, indirect or
metaphorical use of words.

(6) It cannot deal with the SL words that have no equivalents in the TL.

(7) It views meaning as the product of words only, which is not acceptable (see
point 3 above).
 Accordingly, the Arabic versions above are unacceptable, and have to be
corrected as follows (the unacceptable words or grammatical sequences are
underlined):
)٢ً‫(ماى اُطلَ م‬------------------------------------------------------------→)ً‫ب‬٤ً‫ٕ م‬ٌٞ٣ َ‫(ماى اُطل‬a.

)ً‫ب‬٣‫ٍ)ّب‬ٝ‫ إٔ رْوة(رز٘ب‬١‫ → (أهاكد ٓبه‬-----------------------------------)ً‫ب‬٣‫ أهاكد إٔ رأفن ّب‬١‫(ٓبه‬b.

)‫ اٌُلبف‬٠ِ‫ِ ػ‬٤‫ؼ‬٣(------------------------------------------------- →)ْ‫ ك‬٠ُ‫ل ئ‬٣ ٖٓ ً ‫ٕ ػبئْب‬ٌٞ٣ ٞٛ(c.

)٢‫ اُؾوّ اُغبٓؼ‬٢‫ ك‬٢‫ِي اثن ٓؼ‬ٚ‫(ٖٓ ك‬----------------- →)٢‫ اُؾوّ اُغبٓؼ‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬٢‫ِي آٌش(اثن)ٓؼ‬ٚ‫(ٖٓ ك‬d.

َّ
)‫ؿخ‬ٝ‫ػٖ أُوا‬/ٕ‫ها‬ٝ‫اُل‬ٝ ‫(ًق ػٖ اُِق‬------------------------------------- →)‫وح‬٤‫ٍ اُْغ‬ٞ‫وة ؽ‬ُٚ‫هق ا‬ٝ‫(أ‬e.

f. )‫خ‬٤ٓ‫وح ه‬٤‫ٕ ًج‬ٌٞ٣ َ‫نا اُوع‬ٛ ------------------------------------------)ْٜٓ/ٕ‫ْ اُْأ‬٤‫نا اُوعَ ػظ‬ٛ(

g.)‫ٓخ‬ِٞ‫ أُؼ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ‫(أٗب أػوف‬-------------------------------------------------------→)‫ٓبد‬ِٞ‫ أُؼ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ‫(أػوف‬

4.1.1.2. One-to-one Literal Translation:

"One-to-one translation" is to Newmark "a broader form of translation, each

SL word has a corresponding TL word". It respects collocational meanings in their
powerful context. He also adds, "one-to-one translation is more common than
word-for-word translation"(op.cit.) This method of translation means to translate
each SL word or phrase into an identical word or phrase in the TL, with the same
number, grammatical class and type of language. That is, a noun is translated into a
noun, two nouns into two nouns, one adjective into one adjective, two into two,
and so on and so forth. In a similar way, an idiom should be translated into an
idiom, a collocation into a collocation, a proverb into a proverb, a metaphor into a
metaphor, etc. All these translations are done in context, not out of context: e.g.
a. My neighbors are good. )ٖ٤‫ج‬٤ٛ ٌٕٞٗٞ٣ ٢ٗ‫وا‬٤‫(ع‬

b. Sanyo is a well–known trademark. )ً‫لا‬٤‫كخ ع‬ٝ‫خ ٓؼو‬٣‫ٕ ػالٓخ رغبه‬ٌٞ‫ ر‬ٞ٤ٗ‫(ٍب‬

c. He is a young man. He is kind-hearted. )‫ت اُوِت‬٤ٛ ٌٕٞ٣ ٞٛ .ً‫ٕ هعالً ّبثب‬ٌٞ٣ ٞٛ(

d. Sara loves reading wholly and heartedly. )‫ب‬ٜ‫ٖٓ ًَ هِج‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤ًِ ‫(ٍبهح رؾت أُطبُؼخ‬

e. I have blind confidence in you. )‫بء ثي‬٤ٔ‫(أٗب أِٓي صوخ ػ‬

f. Let us shake hands. )١‫ل‬٣‫(كػ٘ب ٗزٖبكؼ ثبأل‬

g. Show me your back. )‫ ػوٗ أًزبكي‬٢ٗ‫(أه‬

h. A true friend does nor stab in the back. )‫و‬ٜ‫ اُظ‬٢‫طؼٖ ك‬٣ ‫ ال‬٢‫و‬٤‫ن اُؾو‬٣‫(اُٖل‬

i. All that glitters is not gold )ً ‫جب‬ٛ‫ِٔغ م‬٣ ‫(ٓب ًَ ٓب‬

j. This mission is a can of worms. )ًَ‫ٕ ؽل٘خ ْٓب‬ٌٞ‫ٔخ ر‬ُٜٔ‫ ا‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ(

It is important to point out that such Arabic translations might look too
primitive, or unreasonable to accpect even from a beginner. The case may be so,
but personal practice and experience with the students of translation, especially at
early stages, in different Arab Countries, confirm the fact that these translations are
frequently come across. Not only this, unfortunately and not surprisingly, some
practitioners of translation produce similar versions from time to time.

This method of literal translation is similar to the first one in two respects:

(1) It keeps the SL word order in the TL.

(2) It insists on having the same type and number of words.

Yet, it is different from it in two respects too:

(1) It takes context into consideration (see Newmark, 1988).

(2) It translates collocational meanings, special and metaphorical SL words and

phrases into their TL equivalents, if and when available.

Therefore, it is perhaps more acceptable and better than word-for-word

translation. Yet, both methods are questionable. In fact, one-to-one translation is
sometimes unsatisfactory because:

(1) It transfers the SL grammar and word order, regardless of the TL grammar and
word order. This is confirmed in the examples by: (a) starting all the Arabic
versions with a subject then a verb each, ignoring nominal sentences ( ‫خ‬٤ٍٔ‫(اُغَٔ اال‬
and the start with the verb in verbal sentences (‫خ‬٤ِ‫( ;(اُغَٔ اُلؼ‬b) insisting on
translating verbs „be‟ into (ٌٕٞ٣) and „have‟ into (‫ِٔي‬٣) only in all the examples; and
(c) translating all personal pronouns.

(2) It insists on having the same number and types of the SL words and lexical
groups in the TL. The result is two possible mistakes: first, the insistence on
having an SL collocation, idiom, metaphor, etc. translated into a TL equivalent
collocation, idiom or metaphor, even though it may not be available in its lexicon.
„Shake hands‟, for example, has no equivalent collocation in Arabic, for ( ‫ٖبكؼ‬٣
١‫ل‬٣‫ )ثبأل‬is not a collocation and has an unnecessary use of(١‫ل‬٣‫)ثبأل‬, which is implied
in (‫ٖبكؼ‬٣). After all, people have (‫ )ٖٓبكؾخ‬with „hands‟ only. Another example is
the translation of the metaphor „a can of worms‟ into (ًَ‫)ؽل٘خ ْٓب‬. Usually, in
Arabic such a metaphor is not available, just an ordinary collocation (‫ٖخ‬٣ٞ‫)ٌِْٓخ ػ‬,
which is a good translation, is available in Arabic; secondly, the insistence on the
same number of words in the translation, which is sometimes not possible to
achieve. That is why the one-word good translation, (‫ٖبكؼ‬٣) is not used here to
translate the two-word collocation, „shake hands‟. Likewise, „well-known‟ should
be translated into one word like (‫وح‬٤ّٜ/‫كخ‬ٝ‫ٓؼو‬/‫هح‬ْٜٞٓ), despite its possibility in
Arabic. Nor is it acceptable to join the two short sentences of „c‟ into one sentence
as the number of words will be less than the original, although it is quite feasible in
Arabic, as the following improved versions for the above examples on the right
handside show (the changed or omitted words are underlined):
a. )ٖ٤‫ج‬٤ٛ ٌٕٞٗٞ٣ ٢ٗ‫وا‬٤‫(ع‬ )ٕٞ‫ج‬٤ٛ ٢ٗ‫وا‬٤‫(ع‬

b. )ً‫لا‬٤‫كخ ع‬ٝ‫خ ٓؼو‬٣‫ٕ ػالٓخ رغبه‬ٌٞ‫ ر‬ٞ٤ٗ‫(ٍب‬ )‫كخ‬ٝ‫خ ٓؼو‬٣‫ ػالٓخ رغبه‬ٞ٤ٗ‫(ٍب‬

c. )‫ت اُوِت‬٤ٛ ٌٕٞ٣ ٞٛ .ً ‫ٕ ّبثب‬ٌٞ٣ ٞٛ( )‫ت اُوِت‬٤ٛ ‫ ّبة‬ٞٛ(

d. )‫ب‬ٜ‫ٖٓ ًَ هِج‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤ًِ ‫(ٍبهح رؾت أُطبُؼخ‬ )‫ب‬ٜ‫(رؾت ٍبهح أُطبُؼخ ٖٓ ًَ هِج‬

e. )‫بء ثي‬٤ٔ‫(أٗب أِٓي صوخ ػ‬ )‫بء(ٓطِوخ)ثي‬٤ٔ‫ صوخ ػ‬١‫(ػ٘ل‬

f. )١‫ل‬٣‫(كػ٘ب ٗزٖبكؼ ثبأل‬ )‫ُ٘زٖبكؼ‬/‫(كػ٘ب ٗزٖبكؼ‬

g. „h‟ and „i‟ are unchanged .

j. )ًَ‫ٕ ؽل٘خ ْٓب‬ٌٞ‫ٔخ ر‬ُٜٔ‫ ا‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ( )‫ثخ‬ٞ‫ثبُـخ اُٖؼ‬/‫ٖخ‬٣ٞ‫ٔخ ٌِْٓخ ػ‬ُٜٔ‫ ا‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ(

More details about the problems of translating such examples are

forthcoming.

4.1.1.3. Literal Translation of Meaning: Direct Translation:

This type of translation is keen on translating meaning as closely, accurately

and completely as possible. It can also be called close, or DIRECT translation. It is
the translation of meaning in context; it takes into account the TL grammar and
word order. Metaphorical and special uses of language are also accounted for in
the TL. In this sense, it can be described as the „full translation of meaning‟.
 Indeed, it can be described as the best method of literal translation. It has a
different view to literal meaning. Literal meaning is not one single, unchanged
direct meaning for a word, but its different meanings in different texts, contexts
and combinations with other words. For example, „run‟ does not always mean
(١‫غو‬٣) in all texts and contexts. Therefore, we cannot say that this is the literal
meaning of „run‟. Rather, it is more precisely described as its common or primary
meaning. Usually, these two meanings –literal and common- are taken to be one
and the same meaning, which is applied to all meanings of the same word. This is
not quite acceptable, for „run‟ is a polysemous word with different meanings in
different contexts, each of which is its literal(or real, precise or contextual)
meaning in a certain context: e. g
1. “To run in the race” )‫ اَُجبم‬٢‫وً٘ ك‬٣/١‫غو‬٣(

2. “To run a company” )‫و ّوًخ‬٣‫ل‬٣(

3. “In the long run” )‫ل‬٤‫ اُجؼ‬ٟ‫ أُل‬٠ِ‫(ػ‬

4. “To run short of money” )ُٚ‫٘لل ٓب‬٣(

5. “To run round” )‫لخ‬ٛ‫بهح فب‬٣‫ّ ثي‬ٞ‫و‬٣/‫ف‬ٞ‫ط‬٣(

6. “To run to fat” )‫ أَُ٘خ‬٠ُ‫َ ئ‬٤ٔ٣(

7. “To run through” )ّ‫ه اٌُوا‬ٝ‫ٔو ٓو‬٣/‫زٖلؼ‬٣(

8. “To run wild” )ٙ‫ا‬ٞٛ ٠ِ‫و ػ‬٤َ٣/ٚ٤‫ز‬٣(

9. “To run across” )‫ٖبكف‬٣(

10.“To run back” )‫هاء‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٠ُ‫ ئ‬ٚ‫ك ثناًور‬ٞ‫ؼ‬٣(

11.“To run into” )‫ٖبكف‬٣/‫ ٖٓبككخ‬٠‫ِو‬٣(

12.“To run its course” )٢‫ؼ‬٤‫ اُطج‬ٙ‫أفن ٓغوا‬٣(

13.“To run in” )ٖ‫ اَُغ‬٢‫ ك‬٢ٓ‫و‬٣ٝ َ‫ؼزو‬٣/ْ‫وؾ‬٣/‫خ‬٤‫ه أُطجؼ‬ٞ‫ل اَُط‬ٚ٘٣(

14.“To run on” )‫َزٔو‬٣(

15.“To run out” )ٔ‫ اُز٘به‬٢‫أفن ك‬٣/ٍ‫بء‬ٚ‫ز‬٣/‫٘لل‬٣(

16.“To run dry” )‫ت‬ٚ٘٣(

17.“The runs” )ٍ‫ب‬ٍٜ‫(ئ‬

 Each of these meanings of „run‟ can be described as literal in a certain
combination and context. We have here 20 literal meanings (three in 13, and two in
15). It is unacceptable, then, to say that it has only one literal meaning, which is
number 1 (١‫غو‬٣), because 2, for example, does not have two meanings, one literal,
one non-literal; it has only one meaning, which is (‫و‬٣‫ل‬٣). Therefore, translating it
into )١‫غو‬٣/ً٘‫و‬٣) is not a literal translation, but a WRONG translation , for we do
not say)‫وً٘ ّوًخ‬٣/١‫غو‬٣) in Arabic , only (‫و ّوًخ‬٣‫ل‬٣).The same applies to the rest of
the examples.

Similarly, metaphorical expressions like idioms can be looked at in the same

way. That is, their metaphorical meanings are the only meanings available in
language and, hence, in translation. Thus, “to beat around/about the bush” means
only (‫ؽ‬ٝ‫وا‬٣/‫ه‬ٝ‫ل‬٣ٝ ‫ِق‬٣); “to get the sack” has only the meaning of (‫ُطوك‬
َ ٣), regardless
of its origin; “monkey business” means (‫جخ‬٣‫بء ٓو‬٤ّ‫ )أ‬only; “tall order” has only one
meaning as (‫ٔخ ّبهخ‬ٜٓ). Other equivalent translations for these idioms are
acceptable, anyway. In literal translation of meaning, these are the only meanings
available and permissible to the translator.

It is possible to say, then, that literal translation is committed to the real

meaning, or meanings, of a word or an expression in language, regardless of
whether it is direct or indirect, common or uncommon, non-metaphorical or
metaphorical. In other words, literal meaning is the real, accurate and contextual
meaning of a word, whether used metaphorically or non-metaphorically, as
illustrated in Figure 3.

Literal meaning=real meaning=accurate meaning=contextual meaning

Metaphorical use Non-metaphorical use

(Fig. 3)

Hence, a metaphor is translated into a metaphor, or any other equivalent

available in the TL. Likewise, a direct, literal meaning is retained in literal
translation as accurately as possible, with no predetermined, special attempt to
 change it into a metaphorical one. For example, “his efforts came to nothing”
would be translated into: )‫ء‬٢ّ ٠ُ‫َٖ ئ‬٣ ُْ/ٟ‫ ٍل‬ٙ‫ك‬ٜٞ‫بػذ ع‬ٙ( rather than into: ( ‫رجقود‬
ً‫ها‬ٞ‫جبء ٓ٘ض‬ٛ ٙ‫ك‬ٜٞ‫بػذ ع‬ٙ/‫اء‬ُٜٞ‫ ا‬٢‫ ك‬ٙ‫ك‬ٜٞ‫)ع‬, because they are metaphorical and expressive
and, therefore, far from the direct meanings of such a simple, straightforward
sentence, especially in a general text. However, such translations can be described
as free translations which are justifiable in certain texts and contexts.

Thus, this method of literal translation is the translation of the real meaning of
a word, or an expression in its linguistic context as accurately and closely as
possible, regardless of its metaphorical/non-metaphorical use. It is confined to, and
conditioned by its context. Indeed, it is a contextual meaning that is enveloped in
its context, neither free, flexible nor variable, but straightforward, accurate, close
and full. Therefore, this method can be the most acceptable among the methods of
literal translation, and the most widely spread and popular in practice among
students of translation and translators. Hence, it is recommended for the students in
particular, and translators in general. Yet, this does not mean that free translation is
unacceptable, for it is highly recommended for certain texts, especially literary and
figurative texts (see below).

Free translation, on the other hand, is a different method, as the following

discussion would confirm.

4.1.2. Free Translation:

Like literal translation, free translation has been a well-established method of

translation since antiquity. Usually, it is associated with translating the spirit, or the
message, not the letter or the form of the text (see Newmak, 1988: 45). It used to
earn wide reputation as the better method at the expense of literal translation, the
worse method of translation. It is the method that is not committed to translate
every single word in a text. It means to translate freely without constraints. The
translator is not strictly constrained by the type of text or context, or the direct and
available meaning of words and phrases. He goes outside texts and out of contexts,
behind and beyond words and phrases, looking perhaps for the spirit, or the
message. He can translate something the way he understands it. His way of
understanding is confined by text and context variably to some or great extent. It is
perhaps the only restriction on him. He cannot translate the way he likes, but the
way he understands. (All other terms pointed out above and used nowadays to
substitute for “free”, such as „communicative‟, „dynamic‟, „pragmatic‟, „creative‟
and 'idiomatic' coincide with many of these implications).

The question now is whether free translation is acceptable or not. The answer
can be sought for in the next two types suggested for this method. The first type is
close and related to context directly, whereas the second is far and related to
context indirectly, as the following discussion and examples confirm:

4.1.2.1. Bound Free Translation:

This type of free translation is derived from the context in a direct way,
though it may go out of it in some way or another, in the form of exaggeration,
expressivity, and effective, rhetorical or formal language. It is the type we usually
understand by the term 'free translation'. Here are examples:
1. He got nothing at the end (ٗ‫كب‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٢ُ‫ػبك فب‬/ٖ٤َ٘‫ ُؽ‬٢‫(هعغ ثقل‬

2. She was sad deep down )ً ‫ب كبهؿب‬ٛ‫إٔجؼ كإاك‬/ٕ‫ب ٖٓ اُؾي‬ٜ‫(رلطو هِج‬

3. You look quite cool )ُ‫ اُغأ‬ٜ‫ هاث‬ٝ‫(رجل‬

4. Swearing is a bad habit )‫م‬َٞ‫( ٍَجبة أَُِْ ك‬

5. East or west, home is best )ٍِ ‫ٍ ٓ٘ي‬ٝ‫ أثلاً أل‬ٚ٘٤٘‫ؽ‬ٝ ٠‫ اُلز‬ٚ‫أُل‬٣ ٗ‫ األه‬٢‫(ًْ ٓ٘يٍ ك‬

6. Love me, love my dog )!١‫و‬٤‫ب ثؼ‬َٜ‫ؾت ٗبهز‬٣ٝ ٢٘‫رؾج‬ٝ ‫ب‬ٜ‫أؽج‬ٝ(

7. Come down to earth )‫بٓي‬ٛٝ‫أهِغ ػٖ أ‬/‫ب‬ٜ٤‫(ًلبى ر‬

8. My friend got to the top very soon )‫ أٍوع ٖٓ اُجوم‬٢‫ح أُغل ك‬ٜٕٞ ٢‫و‬٣‫ ٕل‬٠‫(آزط‬

9. She had a new baby )ً‫لا‬٣‫كاً عل‬ُٞٞٓ ‫ب هللا‬ٜ‫(هىه‬

10. Are you lying to me ? )‫ هللا ًنثبً؟‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬١‫(أرلزو‬

Common among these translations is their expressive, effective, rhetorical and

very formal Arabic, by means of using:

(a) expressions from the Holy Quran (10);

(b) a Prophetic Tradition (i.e. „Sunnah‟) (4);

 (c) popular religious expressions(9);

(d) proverbs(1);

(e) collocations (2,3) (ٕ‫رلطو ٖٓ اُؾي‬/ُ‫ اُغأ‬ٜ‫ )هاث‬and 8 (‫ أٍوع ٖٓ اُجوم‬٢‫ك‬+‫ح‬ٜٕٞ ٠‫;)آزط‬

(f) poetry (5 & 6);

(g) pompous, exaggerated expressions(7).

All these free translations are derived in one way or another from the original.

Although they have gone far from the context, they have not gone too far from it,
or outside it. This means that this type of free translation is not loose, or without
limitations, but is bound to context in some way. For these reasons, this method of
free translation can be acceptable, especially when justified by the type of text, or
language which allows for exaggeration or expressivity of some kind. It is very
close to creative translation. However, when the translation is quite strange to, and
far away from the context and type of text and, it is not advisable. Having said that,
accurate, straightforward, literal translation of meaning is probably a more
preferable version for these statements, especially in simple, general texts, as
suggested below:

)ً‫علا‬/‫٘خ ٖٓ األػٔبم‬٣‫(ًبٗذ ؽي‬.2 )‫خ‬٣‫ب‬ُٜ٘‫ ا‬٢‫ء ك‬٢ّ ٠ِ‫ؾَٖ ػ‬٣ ُْ(.1

)‫ٓخ‬ٞٓ‫ٓن‬/‫ئخ‬٤ٍ ‫(اَُت ػبكح‬.4 )ً‫بكئب‬ٛ ٝ‫(رجل‬.3

)١‫الك‬ٝ‫ أؽت أ‬٢٘‫(ٖٓ أؽج‬.6 )ُٖٛٞ‫ء ٓضَ ا‬٢ّ ‫(ال‬.5

)‫ اُؤخ ثَوػخ كبئوخ‬٠ُ‫ ئ‬٢‫و‬٣‫َٕ ٕل‬ٝ(.8 )‫غ‬ٙ‫ا‬ٞ‫ر‬/ً‫ب‬٤‫اهؼ‬ٝ ًٖ(.7

)‫؟‬٢ِ‫ (أرٌنة ػ‬.10 ً)‫لا‬٣‫كاً عل‬ُٞٞٓ ‫ؼذ‬ٙٝ(.9

4. 1.2. 2. Loose Free Translation:

This free translation method goes far away from the direct linguistic context
to inferences. It is based on the translator's conclusions about what the
speaker/writer wants to say. In other words, it is the translation of intentions. In
this sense, it is a version of pragmatic translation. Therefore, it does not relate
directly to the original context, but is concluded from it. Here are some illustrative
examples:
1. Thank you, Mr. Wilson. Next please. )‫وى‬٤‫ ػ٘لٗب ؿ‬.َِٕٞ٣ٝ ‫ل‬٤ٍ ‫ب‬٣ ‫َ ثبالٖٗواف‬ٚ‫(رل‬

2. It is half past nine. )‫هذ‬ُٞ‫ؽبٕ ا‬/ً‫وا‬٤‫رأفوٗب ًض‬/‫٘ب ثبُٔـبكهح‬٤ِ‫ػ‬/‫ذ اُؾٖخ‬ٜ‫اٗز‬/‫هذ‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٠ٜ‫(اٗز‬

3. Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen. )‫لاد‬٤َُ‫ا‬ٝ ‫ب اَُبكح‬ٜ٣‫ء أ‬ٝ‫ل‬ٛ(

4. I am frightened. )‫(اثن ٓؼ٘ب‬

5. You are a bigmouth! )!‫اٌٍذ‬/‫(أؿِن كٔي‬

6. No bacon with my breakfast, please )َِْٓ ‫(أٗب‬

7. Honesty is the best policy. )‫(أٗذ ف٘ذ األٓبٗخ‬

8. Books are very expensive today. )ّٞ٤ُ‫(ُول ػيف اُ٘بً ػٖ اُوواءح ا‬

9. You should buy a lock for your car. )ّٝ‫األٓبٕ ٓؼل‬/ّ‫ب‬٣‫ األ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ً‫وا‬٤‫بهاد ٓ٘زْوح ًض‬٤َُ‫(ٍوهخ ا‬

10. Have you classic records? )ٜ‫بّ ٓ٘ؾ‬٣‫ األ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ٖ‫ك‬/‫ضخ‬٣‫ اُؾل‬٠‫و‬٤ٍُِٞٔ ً ‫(ٍؾوب‬

All these translations are conclusions, based on the original. They are indirect,
pragmatic translations, rendering the meaning intended by the speakers beyond
what they say. That is, in „1‟, the speaker says “thank you” to a guest or a customer
at the end of their meeting, as an indirect way to ask him/her to leave. So, instead
of asking him/her directly to leave, he goes for “thank you”, which is understood
as “will you leave, the interview is over”(‫ذ أُوبثِخ‬ٜ‫ اٗز‬، ‫َ ثبالٖٗواف‬ٚ‫)رل‬.

The speaker of „2‟ implies that the time of a class, a meeting, etc. is over, or
the time of leaving, or doing something is due.

In „3‟, the speaker(e.g. a tennis umpire) likes to be so polite and respectful to

people, so he says „thank you‟ instead of „quiet‟, or „silence, please‟ to tell them to
stop talking and keep their quiet.

The speaker of „4‟ means to say that he/she cannot stay on his/her own
because he/she is afraid of something. Therefore, he/she asks the listener to stay
with him/her, however indirectly.
 In „5‟, the speaker uses the idiom, 'bigmouth' to express his dissatisfaction
with a person who yells at talking, or talks excessively, noisily and boastfully.
Hence, the translation, (‫ )أؿِن كٔي‬expresses this dissatisfaction, ordering the big-
mouthed person to hush in a rude way.

“No bacon” in „6‟ indicates that the speaker is a Muslim because pork is
forbidden meat in Islam, but not in Christianity. That is why the Arabic translation
jumps to religion.

On the other hand, „7‟ is taken as an indirect comment on a dishonest act by

the hearer. Hence the translation, (‫)أٗذ ف٘ذ األٓبٗخ‬.

As to „8‟, it is a general comment on the expensiveness of books, but

understood as one reason for the people‟s little interest in reading.

However, „9‟ is understood by implication to issue a warning against the

widespread car theft and vandalism these days.

Finally, „10‟ reflects the speaker‟s interest in classical music, which is an

expression of his contempt of modern music. The Arabic translation conveys this
implied sense.

These are loose translations that have in a sense deserted their direct,
linguistic contexts. They are more personal conclusions by the translator than
direct translations restricted in some way to context. Therefore, other translators
may rightly and equally have different conclusions. In other words, this method of
free translation allows such loose freedom for the translator to go far and translate
the intentions and implications beyond the direct context of texts. It does not
matter whether these translations are convincing and justified or not; rather, what
matters is the fact that they do not translate the language and the context on the
page. They reflect indirect inferences and far interpretations of translators.
Therefore, they seem completely different from the original to the extent that they
can be seen by many as unrelated to it.

In my view, broadly speaking, it is not expected from the translator to

translate his own conclusions about a text. Rather, he is expected to transmit the
text on the page as directly and contextually as possible into an equivalent TL text
that is closely, clearly and directly related to it. The interpretations and
implications beyond it are left to readers in both languages to conclude. After all,
this is a matter of respect for them. The translator should not do the reading for the
TL readers. It is not his responsibility, then, to interpret and reveal what the source
text hides or says indirectly. Hence, the following are suggested alternative, closer
and more advisable Arabic versions for the same English sentences, to compare
with the loose versions above:

)‫اُٖ٘ق‬ٝ ‫ب (اَُبػخ) اُزبٍؼخ‬ٜٗ‫(ئ‬.2 ‫ ٍٔؾذ‬ُٞ ٚ٤ِ٣ ١‫ٕ(األؿ)اُن‬َِٞ٣ٝ ‫ل‬٤ٍ ‫ب‬٣ ً‫(ٌّوا‬.1

)ً‫فبئلخ علا‬/‫ فبئق‬٢٘ٗ‫(ئ‬.4 )‫لاد‬٤َُ‫ا‬ٝ ‫ب اَُبكح‬ٜ٣‫أ‬... ً‫(ٌّوا‬.3

)‫ ٍٔؾذ‬ُٞ ١‫ه‬ٞ‫و ٓغ كط‬٣‫ل ّوائؼ اُق٘ي‬٣‫(ال أه‬.6 )‫(ئٗي ٕ ّقبة‬.5

)ّٞ٤ُ‫ظخ اُضٖٔ ا‬ٛ‫(اٌُزت ثب‬.8 )‫اُٖلم ٓ٘غبح‬/‫ٔبٗخ‬ٙ ‫و‬٤‫(األٓبٗخ ف‬.7

)‫ٔخ‬٣‫الد هل‬٤‫رَغ‬/َ٤‫خ رَغ‬ٛ‫َ ػ٘لى أّو‬ٛ( .10 )‫بهري‬٤َُ ً‫ هلال‬١‫ي إٔ رْزو‬٤ِ‫ ػ‬٢‫٘جـ‬٣(.9

Thus, the students of translation are advised to be careful with this type of free
translation. The first type, bound free translation, however, is more possible and
acceptable than this. Yet, it is not as direct as the third method of literal translation
of meaning. (i.e. direct translation), which is easier, more secure, suitable, widely
used, reasonable and convincing type of translation for them than other methods.
 Having said that, and as pointed out earlier, this does not mean that free
translation of both types cannot be recommended as good methods of translation.
On the contrary, they are perhaps more appropriate than literal methods for the
translation of specific types of language and text like literary texts of all genres,
general, cultural, journalistic, political or any text translated with the purpose of
understanding its message (the so-called ‘‫(’اُزوعٔخ ثزٖوف‬, regardless of full details.
Free translation has always been in use a long time ago in history by famous
translators, and is still popular and favourable among many translators nowadays.
After all, it is the translator's decision to adopt either a literal or a free translation
method, provided he translates in context as directly as possible.

Having discussed methods of translation, it is high time now to introduce the

process of translation: 'how translators proceed in translation'.

4..2 The Process of Translation:

The process of translation (or translating) describes how we proceed at

translating something in practice, when we put pen to paper to start translating. It is
the organized stages of translating in application. At translaing a sentence or a
longer text, for example, do we proceed a word by word? a phrase by phrase? a
clause by clause? a sentence by sentence? a paragraph by paragraph? or a text by
text? Many would proceed a word by word, taking translation to mean the
translation of words from one language into another (which is the practice of word-
for-word translation method above). In fact, we do not proceed this way; we
proceed a unit by unit. Each unit is called „a unit of translation‟.

4.2.1. The Unit of Translation:

A unit of translation is any word, or a group of words that can give either a
small or a large part of the meaning of a sentence. Therefore, it is a unit (or a part)
of meaning which can be taken together and understood independently. It marks a
stop we take at translating to write down a meaningful part of a sentence that is not
affected by, or dependent on its remaining part. This means that it can be one word
(like: thus, therefore, yet, actually, clearly, but and other adverbials at the
beginning of sentences); a phrase (e.g. collocations like: pass a law (ً ‫ٗب‬ٞٗ‫َٖ هب‬٣),
brain drain (‫غوح األكٓـخ‬ٛ), etc.; and idioms such as: tall order (‫ٔخ ّبهخ‬ٜٓ), sitting duck
(‫ِخ‬ٍٜ ‫َخ‬٣‫كو‬/‫( )ُؤخ ٍبئـخ‬see chapter 2 for more examples); a clause (e.g. (1) “she did
not come to work yesterday (2) because she was sick” ( ‫ب ًبٗذ‬ٜٗ‫ أل‬،ٌٓ‫ اُؼَٔ أ‬٠ُ‫ُْ رأد ئ‬
‫خ‬ٚ٣‫)ٓو‬: two clauses = two units); or a sentence (e.g. “the man who paid me a visit
last week when I was away, was an old friend of mine.” ٖ٤‫ ؽ‬٢‫بهر‬٣‫ هبّ ثي‬١‫(ًبٕ اُوعَ اُن‬
)٢ُ ً ‫ٔب‬٣‫وب ً هل‬٣‫ٕل‬،ً‫ً٘ذ َٓبكوا‬. The last example is regarded as one unit because the main
clause (i.e. “the man was an old friend of mine”) is divided into two parts: one at
the beginning of the sentence (i.e. „the man‟) and another at the end of it (i.e. „was
an old friend of mine‟). Thus, the main verb of the sentence (i.e. „was‟) occurs
toward the end of the sentence, away from its subject (i.e. „man‟). In Arabic, we
start the sentence with this verb (i.e.ٕ‫(ًب‬, which means that we have to read the
whole English sentence before starting translating.

Thus, in practical terms, the largest unit of translation is the sentence for it is
the basic unit of thought (Newmark, 1988: 30-31), not the clause(Bell, 1991), nor
the text (Hatim&Mason, 1990&1997). Yet, from time to time, we might have
clearcut clause borderlines in a sentence, where clauses are separated parts of
meaning that can be taken as a unit of translation each. Similarly, at times, we may
need to resort to the whole text to understand a sentence. Yet, this is the exception,
not the rule.

So far, we have discussed basic concepts about translation, including: the

meaning of translation, what we translate, and how we translate, with
concentration on methods of translation and the process of translation. We also
have recommended the literal method of direct translation of meaning to students
for it might be safer, more secure and appropriate to them than other methods of
translation suggested above. At the same time, free translation is not rejected nor
undermined, but, rather, recommended strongly more than literal translation for
certain texts (see 4.2.2. above). Sometimes, both methods, literal and free, can be
applied alternately by the translator when the need arises to use free translation
only when literal translation makes the translation inaccurate, "when it is unnatural,
or when it will not work" as also Newmark (1988: 31) points out. Now we may
discuss the obstacles presumably faced at translating and how we overcome them.
In other words, what are the problems of translation? What are the solutions that
can be suggested to them? And on what bases?

5. Translation Problems:

A translation problem is any difficulty we come across at translating that

invites us to stop translating in order to check, recheck, reconsider or rewite it, or
use a dictionary, or a reference of some kind to help us overcome it and make
sense of it. It is anything in the SL text which forces us to stop translating.

A translation problem can be posed by grammar, words, style and/or sounds.

Thus, we have grammatical, lexical, stylistic and phonological problems.

5.1.Grammatical Problems:

a. Complicated SL grammar : e.g.

“Of the three books you have recommended to me, 1 have chosen only
one”()ٜ‫اؽلاً كو‬ٝ ‫ افزود‬، ‫ب‬ٜ‫ ث‬٢٘‫ ٖٗؾز‬٢‫ٖ اٌُزت اُضالصخ اُز‬٤‫ ٖٓ ث‬. Starting the sentence with
„of,‟ and postponing the main clause („I have chosen‟) to a back position, make it
complex. The students of translation find it difficult to understand easily and
directly. The point becomes clearer at comparing it to the following normal, direct
structure: “I have chosen only one of the three books you have recommended to
me”)‫ب‬ٜ‫ ث‬٢٘‫ ٖٗؾز‬٢‫ٖ اٌُزت اُضالصخ اُز‬٤‫ ٖٓ ث‬ٜ‫اؽلاً كو‬ٝ ‫)افزود‬, where the main clause is right at
the beginning.
b. Different TL grammar:

Most English tenses, for example, do not exist in Arabic grammar. Also , all
English sentences are verbal (i.e. should include a main verb each), whereas in
Arabic they are either verbal, or nominal(viz. no verbs at all). Likewise, some
modal auxiliaries have no grammatical equivalent. etc. (See Ch.1 for further
details).

c. Different TL word order:

For example, all English sentences usually start with the subject, followed by
the verb, whereas in Arabic, verbal sentences normally have the verb first and then
the subject. Another example is the position of the adjective: in English it precedes
the noun, while it proceeds it in Arabic.

Among the important and frequent grammatical problems of translation,

discussed in the first chapter, are the following:

1.Translation of verbs „Be‟, „Do‟ and „Have‟.

2. Translation of modal verbs.

3. Translation of questions and negations.

4. Nominal vs. verbal sentences.

5. Word order.

6. Translation of personal pronouns.

7. Translation of present participle vs. gerund.

8. Translation of the past participle.

9. Translation of adjectives.
10. Translation of tenses.

11. Translation of conditional sentences.

12. The change of word class.

13. Translation of articles.

14. Translation of sentence connectors (like and, or, but, in fact, etc.).

All these problems are defined and exemplified for clearly in the next chapter,
with a view to pointing out their ensuing difficulties, and the possible solutions to
them. After all, our discussion of grammatical problems aims solely at locating any
lost or unclear part of meaning. We always trace meaning in translation, nothing
else but meaning, with very few exceptions, though.
 GRAMMATICAL PROBLEMS

Introduction:

English and Arabic belong to two different and distant language families:
West Germanic, and Semitic. Consequently, their grammars are sharply different.
Several grammatical features of English create variable problems of translation
into Arabic. Experience shows that one of the primary mistakes committed by the
students of translation is their presupposition that English grammar and Arabic
grammar can translate each other in a straightforward way. To confirm that, the
problems of translating the most prominent points of English grammar into Arabic
are discussed below. All the problems are followed by one or more suggested
solutions.

1.1. Translation of Verb „BE‟ (i.e. „am, is ,are/was, were/be, been‟):

Problem 1: Literal translation of „am, is, are‟:

When these verbs are the main and only verbs in the sentence, they are
translated by many students literally into (ٌٕٞ٣), which is a poor translation: e.g.

1. “I am a student”: )ً ‫بُجب‬ٛ ًٕٞ‫(أٗب أ‬

2. “She is kind”: (‫جخ‬٤ٛ ٌٕٞ‫ ر‬٢ٛ)

3. “You are a father”: (ً ‫ٕ أثب‬ٌٞ‫)أٗذ ر‬

 Solution: 'am, is, are‟ can be omitted altogether here, thus changing the
English verbal sentences into Arabic nominal ones: i.e. into a topic and a
comment)‫فجو‬ٝ ‫ (ٓجزلأ‬each. e.g.

1. “I am a student”: (‫بُت‬ٛ ‫)أٗب‬

2. “She is kind”: (‫جخ‬٤ٛ ٢ٛ)

3. “You are a father”: (‫)أٗذ أة‬

Therefore, verb „be‟ in the present simple is used here to connect as much as
equate between two words. It is exactly like saying: „X=Z‟. Thus: „I‟=student': (‫أٗب‬
= ‫بُت‬ٛ); „She = kind‟: (‫جخ‬٤ٛ=٢ٛ); and „You=father‟: (‫)أٗذ=أة‬. That is why it is
called an „equative verb‟.

The same applies to the translation of „am, is, are‟ when used as auxiliary
verbs to form the present progressive tense and the present passive voice.A good
number of students translate them literally: e. g.

a. The present progressive:

1. “I am leaving now”: (ٕ٥‫ٓـبكهاً ا‬/‫ٕ أؿبكه‬ًٞ‫)أٗب أ‬

2. “He is eating an apple”: (‫آًالً رلبؽخ‬/ًَ‫أ‬٣ ٌٕٞ٣ ٞٛ)

3. “We are speaking English”: (‫خ‬٣‫ي‬٤ِ‫ٖ اإلٗغ‬٤ٌِٔ‫ٓز‬/ٌِْ‫ٕ ٗز‬ٌٞٗ ٖ‫)ٗؾ‬

The good versions of these examples drop verb „be‟, as follows:

1. “I am leaving now”: ٕ٥‫أٗب ٓـبكه ا‬/ٕ٥‫)أٗب) أؿبكه ا‬

2. “He is eating an apple”: (‫أًَ(آًَ)رلبؽخ‬٣ ٞٛ)

3. “We are speaking English”: (‫خ‬٣‫ي‬٤ِ‫ٕ)اإلٗغ‬ٌِٞٔ‫)ٗؾٖ ٗزٌِْ(ٓز‬

The progressive tense markers, Verb „be‟ and the 'ing' ending for the main
verbs have no equivalent in Arabic grammar. Therefore, the use of (ٌٕٞ٣) in the
first group does not refer to the progressive tense, or the time of action. An adverb
like „now‟ (ٕ٥‫ )ا‬is the only way to refer to the time of action. Other good versions
drop the pronoun, as illustrated later in this chapter under the translation of
personal pronouns.

b. The present passive voice:

1. “I am given another chance”: (ٟ‫ كوٕخ أفو‬٠‫ٕ أُػط‬ًٞ‫)أٗب أ‬

2. “She is invited to the party”: (‫ اُؾلِخ‬٠ُ‫ ئ‬٠‫ٕ رلػ‬ٌٞ‫ ر‬٢ٛ)

3. “They are put in the same situation”: (َٚ‫هق ٗل‬ُٞٔ‫ ا‬٢‫ٖ)ك‬٤‫ػ‬ٞٙٞٓ(ٕٞ‫ؼ‬ٙٞ٣ ٌٕٞٗٞ٣ ْٛ)

The more acceptable versions of Arabic translation dispose of verb „be‟:

1. “I am given another chance”: (ٟ‫ كوٕخ أفو‬٠‫ٓؼط‬/٠‫)أٗب) أٌػط‬

2. “She is invited to the party”: (‫ اُؾلِخ‬٠ُ‫ح)ئ‬ٞ‫(ٓلػ‬٠‫ رلػ‬٢ٛ)

3. “They are put in the same situation”: (َٚ‫هق ٗل‬ُٞٔ‫ ا‬٢‫ٕ)ك‬ٞ‫ػ‬ٞٙٞٓ(ٕٞ‫ؼ‬ٙٞ٣ ْٛ)

Thus, verb „be‟ in the present simple, „am, is, are‟ is usually dropped in
Arabic, both as main as well as auxiliary. It is mostly unacceptable and poor in
Arabic grammar and word order.to translate it into )ٌٕٞ٣( (exception: 'Be, and it
is')ٌٕٞ٤‫((ًٖ ك‬.

Problem 2: The same literal translation of was\were into (ٕ‫)ًب‬:

 Unlike „am, is, are‟, the past simple of „be‟ „was‟ and „were', are translated
literally into (ٕ‫ )ًب‬both as main as well as auxiliary verbs:

a. As main verbs: e. g.

1. “The child was ill”: (ً ‫ب‬ٚ٣‫)ًبٕ اُطلَ ٓو‬

2. “Th bird was beautiful”: (ً‫ال‬٤ٔ‫)ًبٕ اُطبئو ع‬

3. “The players were one team”: (ً‫اؽلا‬ٝ ً‫وب‬٣‫ٕ كو‬ٞ‫)ًبٕ اُالػج‬

b. As auxiliaries: the past progressive: e. g.

1. “Her mother was preparing lunch”: (‫ب رؼل اُـلاء‬ٜ‫اُلر‬ٝ ‫)ًبٗذ‬

2. “My brother was writing a letter”: (‫ٌزت هٍبُخ‬٣ ٢‫)ًبٕ أف‬

3. “Our guests were praying”: (ِٕٖٞ٣ ‫ك٘ب‬ٞ٤ٙ ٕ‫)ًب‬

Yet literal translation is unfavourable when these verbs are used as auxiliaries
to form the past passive voice, as illustrated in the following examples:

c. The past passive voice: e. g.

1. “The food was eaten”: (ّ‫ًبٕ أًَُ اُطؼب‬/ً‫ال‬ًٞ‫)ًبٕ اُطؼبّ ٓأ‬

2. “I was deceived”: (ً ‫ػب‬ٝ‫ٓقل‬/‫)أٗب ً٘ذ ُفلػذ‬

3. “The boys were dismissed”: (‫ا‬ٝ‫وك‬ٛ)‫الك(هل‬ٝ‫ًبٕ األ‬/ٖ٣‫ك‬ٝ‫الك ٓطو‬ٝ‫)ًبٕ األ‬

Solution: „was' and „were‟(ٕ‫)ًب‬can be neglected in Arabic, as follows:

1. “The food was eaten”: (ّ‫)أًَُ اُطؼب‬

2. “I was deceived”: (‫)(أٗب) ُفلػذ‬

3. “The boys were dismissed”: (‫الك‬ٝ‫ٌوك األ‬ٛ)

Therefore, „was‟ and „were‟ are retained in „a‟ and „b‟, but dropped in „c‟
only.

Problem 3: the negligence, or literal translation of „been‟:

The past participle of „be‟ (i.e. been) is wrongly ignored, or translated literally
into (ٖ‫ )ًبئ‬in Arabic:

1. “Where have you been?”: )‫ٖ ً٘ذ ًبئ٘ب ً؟‬٣‫)أ‬

2. “She has been late”: (‫)ًبٗذ ًبئ٘خ ٓزأفوح‬

3. “They had been released”: (ْٜ‫ِن ٍواؽ‬ُٛ‫ٖ أ‬٤٘‫ا ًبئ‬ٞٗ‫)ًب‬

Solution: „Been‟ (ٖ‫ )ًبئ‬is changed into the past simple (see 1&2 below) or
disregarded (see3):

1. “Where have you been?”:=where were you?: (‫ٖ ً٘ذ؟‬٣‫)أ‬

2. “She has been late”=she was late: (‫رأفود‬/‫)ًبٗذ ٓزأفوح‬

3. “They had been released”=they were released: (ْٜ‫ِن ٍواؽ‬ُٛ‫)أ‬

 Thus, the dictionary meaning of „been‟ as (ٖ‫ )ًبئ‬in Arabic is strictly not
advisable to use.

Contrastively, the full form of verb „be‟ (i.e. be) is always literally translated
and, thus, poses no problem: e.g.

1. “He will be with us”: (‫ٕ ٓؼ٘ب‬ٌٞ٣ ‫ف‬ٍٞ)

2. “You can be a good citizen”: (ً ‫٘ب ً ٕبُؾب‬ٛ‫ا‬ٞٓ ٌٕٞ‫غ إٔ ر‬٤‫)رَزط‬

3. “We must be in the hospital now”: (ٕ٥‫ ا‬٠‫ أَُزْل‬٢‫ٕ ك‬ٌٞٗ ٕ‫ أ‬٢‫٘جـ‬٣)

1.2.Translation of Verb „DO‟:

 As a main verb, „do‟ does not pose a grammatical problem. However, as an
auxiliary, it poses more than one problem:

Problem 1 and solution: ‟Do‟ in the negative:

Verb „do‟ is used in English to form the negative of all verbs, except „be‟,
„have‟ and the modal verbs. „Do‟ and „does‟ are used with the present simple,
whereas „did‟ is used with the past. All these forms are meaningless in Arabic.
However, they have the function of indicating the tense of the verb (i.e. present or
past ). What is translated into Arabic is the negative particle „not‟ (‫ )ال‬only: e. g.

1. “He does not like coffee”: (‫ح‬ٜٞ‫ؾت اُو‬٣ ‫)ال‬ٚٗ‫)(ئ‬

2. “Some people do not smile”: (َٕٞٔ‫جز‬٣ ‫)ثؼ٘ اُ٘بً ال‬

3. “That girl does not comb her hair”: )‫ب‬ٛ‫ ّؼو‬ْٜٔ‫رِي اُلزبح ال ر‬/‫ب‬ٛ‫ رِي اُلزبح ّؼو‬ْٜٔ‫(ال ر‬

Problem 2 and solution: „Did‟ in the negative:

The same can be said of the translation of „did not‟. The negative word „not‟
is usually translated into (ُْ) with the present, and occasionally into )‫ (ٓب‬with the
past.

e.g.

1. “She did not eat much”: (ً‫وا‬٤‫ٓب أًِذ ًض‬/ًَ‫)ُْ رأ‬

2. “We did not find the money”: (‫ك‬ٞ‫علٗب اُ٘و‬ٝ ‫ٓب‬/‫)ُْ ٗغل‬

3. “The horse did not fall down”: (ٕ‫ اُؾٖب‬ٜ‫ٓب ٍو‬/ٜ‫َو‬٣ ُْ)
Problem 3 and solution: „Do‟ in questions:

Verb „do‟ is used to form the questions of all English verbs except 'be‟, „have‟
and modal verbs. At translating it into Arabic, it always implies the question
particle (َٛ) whether in the present or in the past: e.g.

1. “Do you sleep early?”: (‫َ ر٘بّ ثبًواً؟‬ٛ)

2. “Does John play football? ”: (ّ‫ٕ ًوح اُول‬ٞ‫ِؼت ع‬٣ َٛ)

3. “Did Ali wait for you last night?”: (‫ِخ أٌٓ؟‬٤ُ ٢ّ ِ‫َ اٗزظوى ػ‬ٛ)

Problem 4 and solution The misunderstanding of „do‟ as a substitute verb:

„Do‟ is used as a substitute verb replacing a whole clause to avoid repetition,

especially as an answer to a question. It is not easy for students to understand it
clearly, because it can substitute for all the verbs which require „do‟ in the
interrogative.

Solution: The general solution for this problem is to translate „do‟ into. (َ‫لؼ‬٣):e. g

1. “Do you admit that? Yes, I do”: (َ‫َ روو ثنُي؟ ٗؼْ أكؼ‬ٛ)

2. “Did she swear? Yes, she did”: (‫َ أهَٔذ؟ ٗؼْ كؼِذ‬ٛ)

3. “Do they work at night ? No, they don‟t”: (ِٕٞ‫لؼ‬٣ ‫ال‬، ‫َ؟ ال‬٤ُِ‫ ا‬٢‫ٕ ك‬ِٞٔ‫ؼ‬٣ َٛ)

This solution is acceptable. Not only this, it is easier and more favourable to
students. Yet, the better solution is to translate it into the main verb of the first
sentence: e. g.
1. “Do you admit that? Yes, I do”: )‫َ روو ثنُي؟ ٗؼْ أهو ثنُي‬ٛ(

2. “ Did she swear? Yes, she did”: ْ ََ ‫َ أَََ ْه‬ٛ(

)‫ٔذ؟ ٗؼْ أهَٔذ‬

3. “ Do they work at night? No, they don‟t”: )ِٕٞٔ‫ؼ‬٣ ‫َ؟ ال ال‬٤ُِ‫ ا‬٢‫ٕ ك‬ِٞٔ‫ؼ‬٣ َٛ(

Problem 5 and solution :„Do‟ as a main verb:

As a main verb, „do‟ is meaningful in translation. Usually, it is translated into

Arabic as (َ‫لؼ‬٣). However, it can sometimes be translated into:

)َ‫لؼ‬٣ ،َٔ‫ؼ‬٣ ،١‫إك‬٣ ،ً‫ ػٔال‬١‫إك‬٣ ،)َٔ‫ّ ثـ(ػ‬ٞ‫و‬٣(e.g.

1. “I will do my best‟‟: (٢‫ٍؼ‬ٞ‫)ٍأكؼَ ٓب ث‬

2. “Mary does her job well”: (َٖ‫ب ثٌَْ ؽ‬ِٜٔ‫ ػ‬١‫ ٓبه‬١‫رإك‬/ّ‫وا‬٣ ‫و ٓب‬٤‫ ف‬٠ِ‫ب ػ‬ِٜٔ‫ ثؼ‬١‫ّ ٓبه‬ٞ‫)رو‬

3. “we did it yesterday”: (ٌٓ‫ب أ‬ٛ‫كؼِ٘ب‬/‫ب‬ٛ‫)ػِٔ٘ب‬

In the following example, 'do' can be translated either as (َٔ‫ؼ‬٣ ،١‫إك‬٣) or

exceptionally as „write‟ (‫ٌزت‬٣):

4. “Some students do their homeworks quickly”: )‫ْ ثَوػخ‬ٜ‫اعجبر‬ٝ ‫ؼَٔ ثؼ٘ اُطِجخ‬٣/‫ٌزت‬٣(

Thus, at translating verb „do‟, the students see whether it has a grammatical
function (i.e. used as an auxiliary), or is a main verb. As an auxiliary, it has no
lexical meaning in Arabic, but implies the grammatical question particle )َٛ(.
However, as a main verb, it has a full lexical meaning.
Problem 6 and solution: 'Do' as an emphatic device:

This verb can be exceptionally used as an emphatic device. Therefore, it is

translated: e.g.

1. “Muslims do recite the Holy Koran everyday” )‫ل‬٤ً‫ّ ثبُزأ‬ٞ٣ ًَ ٕ‫ٕ اُووآ‬َُِٞٔٔ‫ووأ) ا‬٣(ِٞ‫ز‬٣(

2. “That woman does fear Allah” ))‫ف‬ٞ‫(رِي أُوأح رقبف هللا كؼالً(ؽن اُق‬

3. “The girls did behave well” َّ

)‫أؽَٖ اُزٖوف‬ ‫بد هل‬٤‫ال ّي إٔ اُلز‬/ً ‫بد اُزٖوف ؽوب‬٤‫(ُول أؽَ٘ذ اُلز‬

(Emphatic words underlined)

The three forms of verb „do‟ are used in the same sense and for the same
function of emphasis. Therefore, they can be translated equally into any of the
following Arabic emphatic words and phrases ‫ ٓٔب ال‬،‫ ال ّي‬،‫ ٖٓ أُإًل‬،‫ل‬٤ً‫ ثبُزأ‬،ً‫ ؽوب‬،ً‫(كؼال‬
)‫مُي‬ ٠ُ‫ئ‬ ‫ٓب‬ ،‫ت‬٣‫ه‬ ‫ال‬ ،ٚ٤‫ك‬ ‫ّي‬

1 3 Translation of Verb „HAVE‟:

 Like the previous two verbs, „Be‟ and „Do‟, verb „Have‟ (i.e. have, has, had )
is used both as an auxiliary and a main verb. As an auxiliary, it is not so
problematic. However, as a main verb, it can pose a few problems to the students
of translation.

Problem 1 and solution: „Have‟ as an auxiliary:

Verb „have‟ is used as an auxiliary to perform important grammatical

functions with regard to tenses in particular (see tenses later). In this case, it is
meaningless in Arabic, and the students can simply ignore it altogether:e.g.

1. “The workers have left early today”: (ّٞ٤ُ‫)ؿبكه اُؼٔبٍ ثبًواً ا‬

2. “Two girls had finished knitting fast”: (‫ذ كزبربٕ اُؾجي ثَوػخ‬ٜٗ‫)أ‬

3. “The patient has had the medicine”: (‫اء‬ٝ‫٘ اُل‬٣‫ٍ) أُو‬ٝ‫)أفن(ر٘ب‬

Problem 2: „Have' as a main verb: different meanings:

Many students translate „have‟ into one version only, that is: (‫ِٔي‬٣), when it is
the main verb of the sentence. This is only one of its several meanings, and
students are advised to be careful at translating it.

Solution: Students should understand „have‟ as a verb of several manings. Here

they are:

1. “She has money”: (‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ٗو‬ٜ‫ٓؼ‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ٗو‬ٜ٣‫ُل‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ٗو‬ٜ‫ىر‬ٞ‫ ؽ‬٢‫ك‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ٗو‬ٛ‫ػ٘ل‬/ً‫كا‬ٞ‫)رِٔي ٗو‬٢ٛ(

(All these translations are possible, but the last version may be the most common,
while the first could be the least common).
2. “She has her breakfast at 7 O‟clock everyday”: )ّٞ٣ ًَ ‫ب ػ٘ل اَُبػخ اَُبثؼخ‬ٛ‫ه‬ٞ‫ٍ كط‬ٝ‫(رز٘ب‬

3. “She has the tablets on time”: (‫هذ أُؾلك‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٢‫اء) ك‬ٝ‫ة(أهوآ اُل‬ٞ‫ٍ) اُؾج‬ٝ‫)رأفن(رز٘ب‬

4. “She has just had the ticket “: ْ

(ٞ‫ اُزنًوح ُِز‬٠ِ‫)ؽِٖذ ػ‬

5. “She had a telephone call this morning”: (‫نا اُٖجبػ‬ٛ )ً‫ب‬٤‫برل‬ٛ ً‫خ(ارٖبال‬٤‫برل‬ٛ ‫)رِوذ ٌٓبُٔخ‬

6. “ She has to speak two languages”: (ٖ٤‫ب إٔ رزؾلس ثِـز‬ٜ٤ِ‫غت ػ‬٣)

7. “She had a nice holiday”: (‫ِخ‬٤ٔ‫ذ ػطِخ ع‬ٚ‫)ه‬

8 .“Have a good journey”: (‫ ُي هؽِخ ٓٔزؼخ‬٠٘ٔ‫أر‬/‫ِخ‬٤ٔ‫)اٍزٔزِ ْغ ثوؽِخ ع‬

9. “Have a bash” ()‫عوة(ؽظي‬/ٍٝ‫)ؽب‬

What helps students distinguish between these meanings of „have‟ is the

consideration of the word immediately after it (i.e. its object).Together with its
object, „have‟ makes a special combination in Arabic(i.e.collocation). For instance,
although we can say (ً‫كا‬ٞ‫ِٔي ٗو‬٣), we cannot say (‫اء‬ٝ‫ِٔي ك‬٣), or (‫خ‬٤‫برل‬ٛ ‫ِٔي ٌٓبُٔخ‬٣), etc.

1. 4. Translation of MODAL AUXILIARY VERBS/MODALS:

 There are ten main auxiliary verbs (or modals / modal auxiliaries) in English:
„can, could, may, might, will, would, shall, should, must, ought to‟. They create
several problems of translation for two major reasons:

(1) They do not have one-to-one single semantic equivalent in Arabic.

Moreover, there is no grammatical class of verbs called modal auxiliaries
)‫(أكؼبٍ َٓبػلح‬in Arabic. The so-called Arabic 'defective verbs' )‫ (أكؼبٍ ٗبهٖخ‬are
different.

(2) They have several, complex and complicated functions in English. Here is a
short list with the main functions of each of these verbs (mostly adopted
from Quirk et al (1973: 52-57):

1. 'CAN': present ability, possibility, permission; willingness;

2. 'COULD': past ability/possibility, present/future permission; present possibility,

willingness;

3. 'MAY': permission, possibility;

4.'MIGHT': possibility/probability;

5. 'SHALL': future (restricted use), willingness, intention, insistence,

(legal)obligation;

6. 'SHOULD': less categorical obligation, logical necessity, putative use,

contingent

use, formal real conditions;

7. 'WILL': future (preferable in use to 'shall'), certainty, willingness, insistence,

prediction;
8. 'WOULD': past future, request, probability, willingness, insistence, contingent

use in the main clause of a conditional use, volition(especially with 'would

rather');

9. 'MUST': more categorical obligation/compulsion, logical necessity;

10. 'OUGHT TO': less categorical obligation, logical necessity

Clearly, these verbs are complicated and multifunctional in English.

Therefore, it is difficult to give one single specific meaning for each of them.
Usually, the students know them by their most common meanings (underlined
above). The following comparative discussion of the problems of translating some
of the functions of these modals into Arabic and the possible solutions to them may
be helpful to students to understand. The concentration on the grammatical
differences between the two languages would be enlightening in this connection.

Problem 1: „will, shall‟ are not verbs in Arabic:

These two modals are not verbs in Arabic when they are used to refer to
future. They mean the future particle )‫ف‬ٍٞ/ً( (for the future reference of 'would'
in the past, see conditional sentences below).

Solution: They are translated into (‫ف‬ٍٞ) or (‫)ٍـ‬, regardless of the possibility of the
reference of the latter to the near future, and the former to the far future(as stated in
Arabic grammar books), for this is not the frequent case in actual use of Arabic.
e.g.:

1. “They will forgive us”: (‫ٗ٘ب‬ٞ‫َبٓؾ‬٤ٍ/‫ٕ)ُ٘ب‬ٝ‫ـلو‬٤ٍ(ٕٝ‫ـلو‬٣ ‫ف‬ٍٞ)

2. “We shall delay the meeting”: (‫ف ٗإعَ(ٍ٘إعَ)االعزٔبع‬ٍٞ)

Problem 2: The literal translation of modals into one word:

 „Can‟, „may‟, and „must‟ are usually understood by the students to mean one
word each. (‫غ‬٤‫َزط‬٣ ،ٌٖٔ٣ ،‫غت‬٣). But the case is not so .They imply two words. The
problem becomes clearer when the students translate them from Arabic into
English.

Solution: They are translated into the following: )ٕ‫غ أ‬٤‫َزط‬٣ ،ٕ‫غت أ‬٣، ٕ‫ٌٖٔ أ‬٣( because
)ٕ‫ (أ‬is implied in each of these verbs. At the same time, grammatically it is
obligatory in Arabic. e.g.:

1. “We can walk”: (٢ْٔٗ ٕ‫غ أ‬٤‫)َٗزط‬ (We cannot say: ٢ْٔٗ ‫غ‬٤‫(َٗزط‬

3. “we may walk”: (٢ْٔٗ ٕ‫ٌٔ٘٘ب أ‬٣) (not: ٢ْٔٗ ‫ٌٔ٘٘ب‬٣(

4. “We must walk”: (٢ْٔٗ ٕ‫ِيٓ٘ب أ‬٣/) ‫٘ب‬٤ِ‫غت(ػ‬٣) (not: ٢ْٔٗ) ‫٘ب‬٤ِ‫غت(ػ‬٣(

(the second version, )‫ِيٓ٘ب‬٣( expresses necessity, which is one of the meanings of
„must‟).

The same applies to the past tenses of these verbs, „could‟, „might‟, and
„must‟: They are translated into two words each: (ٕ‫اٍزطبع أ‬، ٕ‫أٌٖٓ أ‬، ٕ‫عت (ُيّ) أ‬ٝ)

Problem 3: The special use of „shall‟:

„Shall‟ has a special use in the language of law in particular. It is not used to
refer to future, but to obligation.

Solution: In an English legal text, „shall „means „must‟.e.g.

1.The defendant shall appear before court now: )ٕ٥‫َٔضَ أٓبّ أُؾٌٔخ ا‬٣ ٕ‫ أ‬ٚ٤ِ‫ ػ‬٠‫ أُل َػ‬٠ِ‫غت ػ‬٣(

Problem 4: „should‟ is for obligation only:

Usually „should‟ is understood by many students as the past tense of „shall‟,

and used in English to refer to the future in the past. In fact, „should‟ is not used in
this sense, but in the sense of „ must‟ only.
Solution: „Should‟= „must‟: „Should‟ is always translated into ٕ‫غت أ‬٣ e. g.
1. “You should say everything”: (‫ء‬٢ّ ًَ ٍٞ‫ي إٔ رو‬٤ِ‫غت)ػ‬٣()

2. “We should face him”: (ٜٚ‫اع‬ٞٗ ٕ‫٘ب أ‬٤ِ‫غت)ػ‬٣()

3. “I should believe my parents”: َّ ‫اُ َل‬ٝ ‫ إٔ إٔلم‬٢ِ‫غت)ػ‬٣()

(١

Problem 5: The confusion of „must have‟ and „should have‟:

Many students understand these two constructions as having the same

meaning in the past. But they are not so; on the contrary, they are opposites.

Solution: „Must have‟=action which took place; „should have‟=action which did
not take place. At translating these two examples, we must distinguish between the
first which implies action, and the second which implies no action:
1. “They must have finished wok”: )َٔ‫ا اُؼ‬ٜٞٗ‫ْ أ‬ٜٗ‫(ال ثل أ‬

2. “They should have finished work”: (َٔ‫ا اُؼ‬ٜٞ٘٣ ٕ‫ْ أ‬ٜ٤ِ‫)ًبٕ ػ‬

(but they have not) (ٜٙٞ٘٣ ُْ ٌُْٜ٘)

(‫ )ال ثل‬is used to express the doing, or the expectation and necessity of doing
something in the past; whereas (ْٜ٤ِ‫ )ًبٕ ػ‬expresses the wish to have something
done, but for some reason, it did not take place.

Problem 6: The unclear meaning of „could‟ „would‟. „might‟:

Understood as the past tenses of „can, will and may‟, these modals remain
unclear when used in the present simple, with different meanings.

Solution: Could, would, might=possibility: The common use of these verbs is in

the senses of possibility, permission and expression of politeness/request
Therefore, they have the meaning of „may‟.

1. “She could blame herself”:

2. “She would blame herself”: )‫ب‬َٜ‫ّ ٗل‬ِٞ‫ٌٖٔ إٔ)ر‬٣(‫(هل‬

3. “She might blame herself”:

It is not possible to understand these three modals as verbs in the past. They
reflect the grammatical functions of expressing possibility, permission and/or
polite request here.

Problem 7 and solution: „can‟, „will‟ = may:

„Can‟ usually expresses ability and means (ٕ‫غ أ‬٤‫َزط‬٣) in Arabic, whereas „will‟
is used for the future tense to mean (‫ف‬ٍٞ/‫ )ٍـ‬in Arabic. However, both are used
here in the same meaning of „may‟ to express possibility and/or permission
(i.e.„can‟ and „may‟). e.g.:

1. “You can open the window”: /‫ٌٔ٘ي إٔ رلزؼ اُ٘بكنح‬٣(

2. “you may open the window”: )‫ثآٌبٗي كزؼ اُ٘بكنح‬

Or a polite request (i.e. „can‟, „will‟, „may‟): e.g.

1. “Can you open the window? ” /‫َ ُي إٔ رلزؼ اُ٘بكنح‬ٛ(

2. “Will you open the window? ” ))‫ِي‬ٚ‫اكزؼ اُ٘بكنح ئما أٌٖٓ(ٖٓ ك‬

3. “May you open the window? ”

„Will‟ is, therefore, used in this sense only in the form of a question to express
polite request. On the other hand, „can, will, may‟ are interchangeable with „could,
would, might‟. All have the meaning of „may‟ .
 Modal verbs are, then, problematic. Their main problem may lie in the lack of
one single, unchanged meaning for each of them. The following notes, may help
the students of translation to distinguish the different meanings and functions of
modals.

1. It should be borne in mind that none of them has one fixed meaning only. This
makes us more careful at translating them into Arabic.

2. Understanding their grammatical functions of possibility, permission,

Politeness, expectancy, ability, etc. enables us to distinguish their different
meanings in Arabic.

3. The careful consideration of the difference in Arabic between the common

meaning and the unusual meaning of a modal. „Will‟, for instance, has a common
meaning of referring to the future as (‫ف‬ٍٞ/‫ )ٍـ‬in Arabic. But it has an unusual
meaning of (ٕ‫ثبإلٌٓب‬/ٌٖٓ‫ )ئما أ‬to make a polite request. Just for the sake of illustration
and comparison, we may translate „will‟ in the following example into its common,
and then unusual meaning respectively:

„Will you open the window, please; it is too warm‟:

)‫ ؽبه‬ٞ‫كبُغ‬،‫ِي‬ٚ‫َ ثآٌبٗي كزؼ اُ٘بكنح ٖٓ ك‬ٛ/‫ ؽبه‬ٞ‫كبُغ‬، ‫ِي‬ٚ‫ف رلزؼ اُ٘بكنح ٖٓ ك‬ٍٞ َٛ(

The comparison of the two versions shows that the second is more
conceivable, as the future is irrelevant here. The same comparison can be helpful
with „could‟, „would‟, „must‟, and „should‟ in particular.

4. When „will‟, „would‟, and „shall‟ are used to refer to the future, they are not
translated into verbs in Arabic, but into the future particles (‫ف‬ٍٞ/‫)ٍـ‬. However,
care should be taken that they have other meanings such as implying a polite
request/willingness (i.e. will), a possibility, permission and/or politeness (i.e.
would), or an obligation (i.e. shall, should). These meanings have their equivalents
in Arabic, as the previous discussion confirms.

1.5.Translation of QUESTIONS:

Questions in English are formed in two ways only:

1.The conversion of the subject and the verb when one of the following verbs is
used: „be‟, „have‟ and the modal verbs(see examples below).

2. The use of the auxiliary verb „do‟ with the rest of verbs in English (see also
examples below).

Problems could arise at translating the different types of questions, because

making questions is not the same in Arabic. Both types of questions are called
„yes-no questions‟ because they are answered by „yes or no‟.

Problem 1: The possibility of imitating the question form:

The students might think of translating the types of English questions into
equivalent types in Arabic. They will find this not possible and quite problematic,
because simply there are no such equivalents.

Solution: One word for all questions:

 The solution for the problems of translating all types of English questions is
simply by using only one word in Arabic, that is, the question particle, (َٛ) to
begin all the equivalent Arabic questions: e.g.

1. “Are you playing tennis? ”: (ٌ٘‫َ رِؼت اُز‬ٛ)

2. “Have you played tennis? ”: )‫َ ُؼجذ اُزٌ٘؟‬ٛ(

3. “Do you play tennis? ”: (‫َ رِؼت اُزٌ٘؟‬ٛ)

4. “Did you play tennis? ”: (‫َ ُؼجذ اُزٌ٘؟‬ٛ)

Two more, less frequent question words can be sometimes interchangeable

with (َٛ). The first is the Arabic alphabetical letter, al-hamza (‫)أ‬, and the second
is )ّ‫ال‬ٛ(. The latter is quite rare and may imply the meaning of request. Therefore, it
is advisable to avoid using it frequently. The former, however, is more popular
than the latter, and interchanges with (َٛ) perfectly as follows: ( ،‫ أُؼجذ‬،‫ أرِؼت‬،‫أُؼجذ‬
‫)أرِؼت؟‬

Problem „2‟: The disappearance of (َٛ) with WH-questions:

Some questions are formed by using one of the following words: „what‟
(‫ٓبما‬/‫)ٓب‬, „why‟ (‫ ُٔبما‬/ َْ ُ), „where‟ (ٖ٣‫„ )أ‬which‟ (١‫ )أ‬, „who‟ (َٖٓ ) , „whom‟
(ٖٓ/ٖٔٓ/ُٖٔ), 'whose' )ُٖٔ( „when‟(٠‫ )ٓز‬, „how‟ (‫ق‬٤ً). All these question words
(except „how‟) start with „wh‟, which is why the questions stared with them are
called WH-questions.

Solution: The omission of (َٛ):

 When „do‟ and the subject-verb conversion are used in a WH-question, they
are meaningless. (َٛ) is no longer used in the Arabic translation: e.g.

1. “Why are they crying? ”: )‫ٕ؟‬ٌٞ‫ج‬٣ ‫(ُٔبما‬

2. “What have you said? ”: )‫(ٓبما هِذ؟‬

3. “Who can answer? ”: )‫ت)؟‬٤‫غ‬٣ ٕ‫غ االعبثخ(أ‬٤‫َزط‬٣ ٖٓ(

4. “When does the baby sleep? ”: )‫٘بّ اُطلَ؟‬٣ ٠‫(ٓز‬

5. “Where did the man disappear?”: )‫ اُوعَ؟‬٠‫ٖ افزل‬٣‫(أ‬

6. "Whom are you talking to on the phone? )‫برق؟‬ُٜ‫ ا‬٠ِ‫ ٖٓ رزؾلس ػ‬٠ُ‫(ئ‬

7. Whose money is this? )‫ك؟‬ٞ‫ اُ٘و‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ُٖٔ(

8. How do you do? )‫ق أٗذ؟‬٤ً /‫ق ؽبُي‬٤ً(

1.6. Tranaslation of NEGATION:

 Negation in English includes words like „not‟, „do not‟, „does not‟, „never‟,
„neither‟, 'nor‟ and „no‟. The translation of these words is not always as easy as
many students might think. The following discussion illustrates this.

Problem 1: „Not‟ has one single equivalent:

„Not‟ seems a simple word and has a straightforward translation as (‫ )ال‬in

Arabic. But it is not always so. Other translations are given to „not‟, but all of them
are negative words, as the following examples show:

Solution: „Not‟ has more than one equivalent:

The students are required to search for the suitable word in Arabic. It can be
either (‫)ال‬, (ُٖ), (ٌ٤ُ) or (‫)ٓب‬:e.g.

1. “She cannot pay money”: )ً‫كا‬ٞ‫غ إٔ رلكغ ٗو‬٤‫(ال رَزط‬

2. “She will not pay money”: )ً‫كا‬ٞ‫ف)ُٖ رلكغ ٗو‬ٍٞ((

3. “She has not money”: )ً‫كا‬ٞ‫ال رِٔي ٗو‬/‫ب‬ٜ‫ك ٓؼ‬ٞ‫ال ٗو‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ٗو‬ٜ‫ٌ ٓؼ‬٤ُ(

4. “All that glitters isn‟t gold”: )ً‫جب‬ٛ‫ِٔغ م‬٣ ‫(ٓب ًَ ٓب‬

„Not‟ is strong after „will‟ and „shall‟, and is, therefore, always translated into
the strong (ُٖ) only for future reference in Arabic.

Problem 2: A difference between „do not‟ „does not‟ and „ did not‟:
 These constructions are different in English. Therefore, some students might
think that they equally have to be translated into different forms in Arabic in terms
of word-for-word translation. But we do not have a word for each of these three
particles. Two equivalent particles only are used in Arabic, one for „do not‟ and
„does not‟ (in the present), and another for 'did not‟(in the past).

Solution; „Do not‟ and „does not‟=(‫„ ;)ال‬did not‟=(ُْ):

(‫ )ال‬is used in Arabic to make negation in the present. It is, therefore,

equivalent to „do not‟ and „does not‟. But (ُْ) is to negate something in the past.
That is why it translates „did not‟. It interchanges with another negative device, )‫(ٓب‬
which is followed by the past tense in Arabic. Yet, it is more frequent than it in
use. e.g.:

1. “Many people do not play chess”: )‫و ٖٓ اُ٘بً) اُْطوٗظ‬٤‫ِؼت ًض‬٣ ‫ٕ (ال‬ٞ‫ِؼج‬٣ ‫و ٖٓ اُ٘بً ال‬٤‫(ًض‬

2. “Her sister does not eat much”: )ً‫وا‬٤‫ب ًض‬ٜ‫ال رأًَ أفز‬/ً‫وا‬٤‫ب ال رأًَ ًض‬ٜ‫(أفز‬

3. “The children did not sleep early yesterday”: )ٌٓ‫لبٍ ثبًواً أ‬ٛ‫ْ٘ األ‬٣ ُْ(

4. “The cat did not catch the mouse”: )‫ ثبُلأه‬ٜ‫َٔي اُو‬٣ ُْ(

Problem „3‟: „Never‟ as one word (ً‫ )أثلا‬in Arabic:

Dictionaries give „never‟ one meaning in Arabic, which is (ً‫)أثلا‬. But we

cannot translate it into it only. For instance, it is not allowed to say the following
versions in Arabic.

1. “We never give up”: )َٜ‫ه‬/ً‫(َٗزَِْ أثلا‬

2. “I never saw him before”: )َ‫ ٖٓ هج‬ٜ‫ه‬/ً‫ أثلا‬ٚ‫ز‬٣‫(هأ‬

3. “Never say this again!”: )‫خ‬٤ٗ‫نا صب‬ٛ َ‫ ه‬ٜ‫ه‬/ً‫(أثلا‬

Solution: „Never‟ is either (ً‫أثلا‬... ‫ أثلاً(;)ال‬... ُٖ)or(ً‫ أثلا‬...ُْ):

„Never‟ is a strong negative word in English, and translated into two words in
Arabic, preferably (ً‫أثلا‬...ُٖ) or (ً‫أثلا‬...ُْ). Therefore, the previous examples can be
translated suitably as follows:

1. “We never give up”: ))ٜ‫(ُٖ(ال)َٗزَِْ أثلاً (ه‬

2. "I never saw him before”: )َ‫ ٖٓ هج‬ٜ‫ ه‬ٙ‫ُْ أه‬/ً‫ ٖٓ هجَ أثلا‬ٙ‫(ُْ أه‬

(Notice the change of the past into present, and the form of verb after (ُْ) in
Arabic.)
3. “Never say this again”: ))‫اُجزخ‬/ٜ‫خ أثلاً (ه‬٤ٗ‫نا صب‬ٛ َ‫(ال رو‬

(The last two Arabic words, )‫اُجزخ‬/ٜ‫ (ه‬are two good variations on )ً‫)(أثلا‬

Problem 4: The confusion of „neither…nor‟ with „either…or‟:

 Because of their lexical similarity, these two constructions might be confused.
However, they are opposite to one another: The first (‫ال‬ٝ...‫ )ال‬is negative, whereas
the second (ٝ‫أ‬...‫ )ئٓب‬is positive. e.g.:

1. “I like neither lying nor cheating”: )ِ‫ اُـ‬ٝ‫((أٗب)ال أؽت اٌُنة أ‬

Solution: „Neither nor‟=(‫ال‬ٝ...‫)ال‬:

Since it is a negation, „neither…nor‟ does not imply a choice between two

things implied by „either…or‟(ٝ‫أ‬...‫)ئٓب‬, but a denial of two things. Thus , the
previous example should be:

1. “I like neither lying nor cheating”: )ِ‫ال اُـ‬ٝ ‫((أٗب)ال أؽت (ال) اٌُنة‬

(Notice the possible addition of the second (‫ )ال‬in Arabic for more emphasis). This
means that there are three (‫)ال‬, which is normal for emphatic reasons. As to )‫(أٗب‬, it
is left between brackets as optional, just in case emphasis is meant to be put on it.)

Problem 5: „No‟ as (‫ )ال‬only:

Normally, students take „no‟ to mean (‫ )ال‬only in Arabic. But it can have other
words to translate it, all of which are negative words. We cannot say the following
in

Arabic:

1.“No smoking”:
)ٖ٤‫(ال رلف‬

2. “No children allowed”: )ٍٞ‫ْ ثبُلف‬ُٜ ‫ػ‬َٞٔٓ ٍ‫لب‬ٛ‫(ال أ‬

3. “She has no money”: )‫ك‬ٞ‫رِٔي ال ٗو‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ال ٗو‬ٛ‫ػ٘ل‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب ال ٗو‬ٜ‫(ٓؼ‬

Solution: „No‟ =(‫)ال‬, (ٌ٤ُ) or (‫ع‬ٞ٘ٔٓ):

 „No‟ needs to be conveyed into Arabic by a proper word. It cannot be always
translated into (‫ )ال‬only. Thus, the previous examples would be as follows:

1. “No smoking”: ٌ ٞ٘ٔٓ/‫ع‬

)ٖ٤‫ع اُزلف‬ ٌ ٞ٘ٔٓ ٖ٤‫(اُزلف‬

2. “No children allowed”: ٌ ٞ٘ٔٓ/‫ع‬

). ٍٞ‫ع كف‬ ٌ ٞ٘ٔٓ ٍ‫لب‬ٛ‫ٍ األ‬ٞ‫(كف‬

3. “She has no money”: ‫ال‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ب) ٗو‬ٜ‫ىر‬ٞ‫ ؽ‬٢‫ك‬/‫ب‬ٛ‫ب (ػ٘ل‬ٜ‫ٌ ٓؼ‬٤ُ(

)ً‫كا‬ٞ‫ال رِٔي ٗو‬/ ‫ب‬ٜ‫ك ٓؼ‬ٞ‫ٗو‬

1.7. Translation of Sentence Types: NOMINAL VS. VERBAL SENTENCES:

There are two major types of sentence, nominal and verbal. One of the main
differences between English and Arabic grammar is that English has verbal
sentences only (in the sense that every grammatical English sentence should
contain a main verb), whereas Arabic has both verbal and nominal sentences. A
nominal sentence requires no verb of any kind. In general, it consists of two nouns,
the first is called 'Topic/Subject' )ٚ٤ُ‫أَُ٘ل ئ‬/‫(أُجزلأ‬, and the second is called
'Comment /Predicate' )‫أَُ٘ل‬/‫(اُقجو‬. Although English sentences start with a noun,
this noun is called 'subject' )ٚ٤ُ‫أَُ٘ل ئ‬/َ‫(اُلبػ‬, followed by the main verb )َ‫ (اُلؼ‬of the
sentence and an object, or a complement (the last three categories are called
'Predicate' )‫(أَُ٘ل‬. There is no English sentence that can be described as
grammatically well-formed unless it contains a main verb (an auxiliary verb is not
enough, there must be a main/lexical verb), what is known in Arabic as 'verb', for
there are no auxiliaries in its grammar. In this sense, if English sentences were
translated in the same word order, there would be no verbal sentences in Arabic,
only nominal sentences. Here is a short list with the main sentence types in Arabic:

a. Verbal Sentences (V+S+O/C)

 b. Nominal Sentences (Topic+Comment)

c. Functional Sentences )‫ب ٓؾَ ٖٓ اإلػواة‬ُٜ ٢‫( (اُغَٔ اُز‬seven types).

d. Non-Functional sentences )‫ب ٖٓ اإلػواة‬ُٜ َ‫ ال ٓؾ‬٢‫( (اُغَٔ اُز‬nine types).

There are variations on (Nominal (a-d) and verbal (e-h)) sentence types: e.g.

a. ّ ‫(عِٔخ‬: )ٕ‫(ئ‬
'Inna sentence )‫ب‬ٜ‫ار‬ٞ‫أف‬ٝ ٕ‫ئ‬ ّ set of semi-verbal particles + a
sentence (a particle of the set+topic (accusative) + comment
(nominative)).

b. Prepositional sentence type )‫ه‬ٝ‫أُغو‬ٝ ‫(عِٔخ اُغب ّه‬: A prepositional phrase

pertaining to an embedded comment, followed by a belated topic.

c. Adverbial sentence type )‫خ‬٤‫(اُغِٔخ اُظوك‬: An adverb of time/place related to

an embedded comment, followed by a belated topic.

d. Fronted comment and belated topic sentence type )‫ْ اُقجو‬٣‫(عِٔخ رول‬.

e. Passive voice sentence type )ٍٜٞ‫ ُِٔغ‬٢٘‫(عِٔخ أُج‬

f. Fronted Object+V+O sentence type )ّ‫ أُول‬ٚ‫ٍ ث‬ٞ‫(عِٔخ أُلؼ‬: An embedded

verb+O+V+O

g. 'Kaana' sentence)‫ب‬ٜ‫ار‬ٞ‫أف‬ٝ ٕ‫(عِٔخ ًب‬: )ٕ‫ (ًب‬set of so-called

'defective/imperfective verbs'+sentence (a verb of this set+topic
(nominative)+comment (accusative)).

h. Conditional sentences )‫خ‬٤ٛ‫(اُغَٔ اُْو‬: A conditional particle (e.g.

.‫ ئُـ‬،ْٖ َٓ /ٕ‫ئ‬/‫ال‬ُٞ/ُٞ/‫)ئما‬
ْ +topic+V, or V+S+O/C. etc. (See Alghalayeeni
(1999)).

i. Imperative sentence type )‫ـخ األٓو‬٤ٕ ‫(عِٔخ‬

 Thus, there is a considerable difference of sentence types between the two
languages. Such difference causes some problems for students of translation:

Problem 1: The absence of topic-comment/predicate nominal sentences:

Since all sentences have main verbs in English, students might wrongly think
that they have to be translated equally with verbs into Arabic, keeping to the same
English word order. Consequently, this may produce awkward Arabic noun-verb
nominal sentences: e. g.

1. "I am a student" )ً‫بُجب‬ٛ ًٕٞ‫(أٗب أ‬

2. “The president is ill”: )ً‫ب‬ٚ٣‫ٕ ٓو‬ٌٞ٣ ٌ٤‫(اُوئ‬

3. “Our neighbours are good”: ٌٕٞٗٞ٣ ‫واٗ٘ب‬٤‫(ع‬

)ٖ٤‫ج‬٤ٛ

(Many students produce still more awakward Arabic grammar by using the
colloquial,

broken forms: )‫بُت‬ٛ،٘٣‫ٓو‬، ‫ا‬ٌٞٗٞ٣) instead of the grammatical forms: ٌٕٞٗٞ٣(

)ً‫بُجب‬ٛ ، ً ‫ب‬ٚ٣‫ٓو‬،

used here.)
4. “She has a headache”: )ً ‫ رِٔي ٕلاػب‬٢ٛ(

5. “We have money”: )ً‫كا‬ٞ‫(ٗؾٖ ِٗٔي ٗو‬

6. “You have many friends”: )ٖ٣‫و‬٤‫(أٗذ رِٔي إٔلهبء ًض‬

Solution: Verbs „Be‟ and „Have‟ in the present:→ nominal sentences:

 When „am‟, „is‟, and „are‟ are used as main verbs, their sentences are nominal
in Arabic. Therefore, they are deleted completely in Arabic. They have the
function of the the mathematical symbol, equals „=‟(see specially l.1. above). By
applying this to the first three examples above, the following translations can be
suggested:

1. “I=a student”: )‫بُت‬ٛ=‫→ (أٗب‬ )‫بُت‬ٛ ‫(أٗب‬

2. “The president=ill”: )٘٣‫ٌ=ٓو‬٤‫→ (اُوئ‬ )٘٣‫ٌ ٓو‬٤‫(اُوئ‬

3. “Our neighbours=good”: )ٕٞ‫ج‬٤ٛ=‫واٗ٘ب‬٤‫→ (ع‬ )ٕٞ‫ج‬٤ٛ=‫واٗ٘ب‬٤‫(ع‬

Verb „have‟ is also used as a main verb in the two forms „have, and „has‟, and
can be translated into a verbal, or a nominal construction. The following
retranslation of the examples 4-6 above illustrates the point:

4. “She has a headache”: )‫ب ٕلاع‬ٛ‫(ػ٘ل‬

5. “We have money”: )‫ك‬ٞ‫ىر٘ب ٗو‬ٞ‫ ؽ‬٢‫ك‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫ٓؼ٘ب ٗو‬/‫ك‬ٞ‫(ػ٘لٗب ٗو‬

6. “You have many friends”: )‫(ػ٘لى إٔلهبء ًُضو‬

Hence, the English verbal sentences become nominal sentences in Arabic,

having a topic and a comment instead of a subject and a verb.

Problem „2‟: The confusion of the present with past tenses of „Be‟ and „Have‟:

Problem „2‟ is caused by confusing the solution to the first problem to be

applied by some students to the translation of these two verbs in the past tense as
well (i.e. translating sentences into nominal constructions of 'topic and
comment/subject and predicate' in Arabic). However, the past tense of 'Be' and
'Have' are translated into verbal sentences(verb+subject) in Arabic, thus retaining
the past tense of verbs and sentences.

Solution: Verbs „Be and „Have‟ in the past→verbal sentences:

When „was‟, „were‟ and „had‟ are used, they should be translated as verbs in
the past, as the following examples show:

1. “He was in the hospital last week”: ‫ع‬ٞ‫ األٍج‬٢‫ ك‬٠‫ أَُزْل‬٢‫(ًبٕ ك‬
)٢ٙ‫أُب‬

2. “The players were ready for the match”: )‫ٖ ُِٔجبهاح‬٣‫ي‬ٛ‫ٕ عب‬ٞ‫(ًبٕ اُالػج‬

3. “We had some problems there”: )‫٘بى‬ٛ ًَ‫(ًبٕ ػ٘لٗب ثؼ٘ أُْب‬

Clearly, the common verb in these examples is (ٕ‫)ًب‬. Therefore, it is not

common here to change the verbal structure into a nominal structure in Arabic,
unless the tense of verb is ignored, which is not advisable (see also 1.1. and 1.3.
earlier for more discussion).
1.8. Translation of WORD ORDER:

The normal order of the words of the Arabic sentence is sometimes different
from that of the English sentence whose normal order is as follows: subject-verb-
object/complement. In Arabic, however, the normal word order is two types:

1.Nominal word order: Topic and comment/subject and predicate(‫فجو‬ٝ ‫)ٓجزلأ‬: Two
nouns, a noun and an adjective, or a noun and a verb when the noun is emphasised.

2. Verbal word order: Verb-subject-object/complement.('2' is more frequent than

'1').

Problem 1: The reservation of the English word order:

The English word order is usually translated literally: N-V-O/C into Arabic,
regardless of its normal word order, which is possible, but not advisable as a rule
unless the noun is emphasised. In the following examples, the word order is
normal, and the English subject is not emphasised. Therefore, translating them into
English word order in Arabic is not justified:
1. “The diplomat left Damascus for London”: )ٕ‫ ُ٘ل‬٠ُ‫ ؿبكه كْٓن ئ‬٢ٍ‫ٓب‬ِٞ‫(اُلث‬

2. “The sky became cloudy”: )ّٞ٤‫(أَُبء رِجلد ثبُـ‬

3. “The pupils enjoyed their holiday”: )ْٜ‫ثؼطِز‬/ْٜ‫ا ثاعبىر‬ٞ‫ن اٍزٔزؼ‬٤ٓ‫(اُزال‬

Solution: The change into normal Arabic word order:

 In normal cases, the English word order is replaced by the more frequent and
normal Arabic word order of: verb–subject-object/complement. The examples can,
therefore, be retranslated as follows:
1. “The diplomat left Damascus for London”: )ٕ‫ ُ٘ل‬٠ُ‫ كْٓن ئ‬٢ٍ‫ٓب‬ِٞ‫(ؿبكه اُلث‬

2. “The sky was cloudy”: )ّٞ٤‫(رِجلد أَُبء ثبُـ‬

3. “The pupils enjoyed their holiday”: )ْٜ‫ن ثؼطِز‬٤ٓ‫(اٍزٔزغ اُزال‬

where the verb is first, followed by the subject and then the object(1), or the
complement(2&3)(see also the previous section).

Problem 2: Similarity of the word order of English and Arabic:

There is one type of word order in Arabic which is identical with the English
word order: subject-verb-object/complement. However, in Arabic it is a nominal
rather than a verbal word order, because the subject becomes a topic and the verb
functions as a comment. The problem with this similarity is that students mostly
translate English into this identical word order in Arabic, regardless of the more
normal nominal and verbal word orders discussed above. This is due to the
possibility of translating word for word into Arabic. In other words, this word
order of a noun and a verb becomes the rule for the students.

Solution: Identical SL&TL word order is the exception:

As a matter of fact, this identical English-Arabic word order is the exception,

not the rule. It is used when greater emphasis than usual is intended to be put on
the subject. To understand this, we may compare the part of the verse of the Holy
Quran)ٌ‫ األٗل‬٠‫ك‬ٞ‫ز‬٣ ‫( (هللا‬where the subject)‫ (هللا‬is unusally first for more emphasis, for
Allah the Almighty only can take the souls, followed by the verb )٠‫ك‬ٞ‫ز‬٣(( to the
more normal version, )ٌ‫ هللا األٗل‬٠‫ك‬ٞ‫ز‬٣( (i.e. the verb)٠‫ك‬ٞ‫ز‬٣( is prior to the subject )‫)(هللا‬.
Understanding the difference between the original verse and the hypothetical
version makes the point clearer, I hope. At all events, such Arabic word order is
not wrong, nor meaning is affected considerably. There is a possibility that the
students may always follow the same English word order, ignoring in effect the
other types of word order available in Arabic grammar, especially the more
frequent verb-subject order. In the following examples, the first word receives
special emphasis in both languages:

1. “God likes us”: )‫ؾج٘ب‬٣ ‫(هللا‬

2. “The zionist police kill children”: )ٍ‫لب‬ٛ‫خ روزَ األ‬٤ٗٞ٤ُٜٖ‫خ ا‬ٛ‫(اُْو‬

3. “The earthquake took place yesterday”: )ٌٓ‫(اُيُياٍ ؽلس أ‬

However, we cannot always translate in this word order in Arabic because we

do not emphasise everything in translation. On the contrary, emphasis is the
exception, not the rule. Therefore, it is not advisable to translate the following
English examples with an identical Arabic word order, as follows:

1. “Mary fell ill last week”: )٢ٙ‫ع أُب‬ٞ‫ذ األٍج‬ٙ‫ ٓو‬١‫(ٓبه‬

2. “My brother always comes back home late”: )ً‫ذ ٓزأفوا‬٤‫ اُج‬٠ُ‫ك ئ‬ٞ‫ؼ‬٣ ً ‫ كائٔب‬٢‫(أف‬

3. “Today looks nice”: )ً‫ال‬٤ٔ‫ ع‬ٝ‫جل‬٣ ّٞ٤ُ‫(ا‬

Rather, we would translate them more normally into:

1. “Mary fell ill last week”: ‫ع‬ٞ‫ األٍج‬١‫ذ ٓبه‬ٙ‫(ٓو‬

)٢ٙ‫أُب‬

2. “My brother always comes back home late”: )ً‫ذ ٓزأفواً كائٔب‬٤‫ اُج‬٠ُ‫ ئ‬٢‫ك أف‬ٞ‫ؼ‬٣(

3. “Today looks nice”: )ً‫ال‬٤ٔ‫ّ ع‬ٞ٤ُ‫ ا‬ٝ‫جل‬٣(

Problem 3: Unified, flexible TL word order: )ٕ‫ (ئ‬sentence:

In Arabic, there is one type of sentence where both the English and Arabic
ّ sentence. It is a sentence headed by )ٕ‫(ئ‬
word orders meet, that is, the 'inna' )ٕ‫(ئ‬
that, on the one hand, retains the English subject-verb word order, with an
acceptable Arabic word order in effect. So all we do is put 'inna' at the beginning
of the English sentence, with no change of word order. Here are paired examples
with two equally acceptable versions of translation, the first of which is more
emphasised than the second:

1."Hypocrites live a miserable life" )‫ثبئَخ‬/‫بح رؼَخ‬٤‫ٕ ؽ‬ٞ٤‫ؾ‬٣ ٖ٤‫( (ئٕ أُ٘بكو‬cf. ...‫بح‬٤‫ٕ ؽ‬ٞ‫ب أُ٘بكو‬٤‫ؾ‬٣(

2 "Ladies hide the truth about their age":)ٍٖٜ٘ ‫وخ‬٤‫ٖ ؽو‬٤‫قل‬٣ ‫لاد‬٤َُ‫( (ئٕ ا‬cf....‫لاد‬٤َُ‫ ا‬٢‫(رقل‬

3."Her father suffers from asthma": )ٞ‫ ٖٓ اُوث‬٢ٗ‫ؼب‬٣ ‫ب‬ٛ‫( (ئٕ أثب‬cf. ٞ‫ب ٖٓ اُوث‬ٛٞ‫ أث‬٢ٗ‫ؼب‬٣(

This type of sentence and word order is frequent in Arabic. However, it

should not be overused at the expense of the frequent nominal sentences and the
more frequent verbal sentences. On the other hand, )ٕ‫ (ئ‬is emphatic and, hence,
would rather be used with care. In any case, these three possible types reflect the
flexibility of Arabic word order, in comparison to the single, inflexible English
word order.

Problem 4: Imperative statements are an exception:

Imperative sentences are an exception in the word order of English and

Arabic. Both have an identical word order of imperatives;

Solution: Word-for-word translation of word order(metaphorical statements are not

included):
 The literal, word–for-word translation of the English word order of the
imperative into Arabic is feasible: e. g.

1. “Stay where you are”: )‫ش أٗذ‬٤‫(ئثن ؽ‬

2. “Be patient”: )‫رؾ ََّ ثبُٖجو‬/‫إِجو‬/)ً‫هاً(ٕبثوا‬ٞ‫(ًٖ ٕج‬

3. “Listen to me carefully”: )ً‫لا‬٤‫)ع‬٢ُ‫(إؾ ئ‬٢٘‫(ئٍٔؼ‬

4. “Beware of the dog”: )‫(اِؽزوً ٖٓ اٌُِت‬

5. “Hold your tongue”: ْ

)‫ٕٔذ‬ُ‫ا‬/‫ي) َُبٗي‬٤ِ‫(أَٓ َِي (ػ‬

6. “Meet your promises”: )‫كى‬ٞ‫ػ‬ٞ‫ف)ث‬َٝ‫ف (أ‬

ِ (

7. “Don‟t believe him”: )ٚ‫(ال رٖله‬

8. “Do not backbite your friends”: )‫(ال رَـزتْ إٔلهبءى‬

1.9.Translation of PERSONAL PRONOUNS:

Problem 1: the straightforward translation of personal pronouns:

To students, English personal pronouns have a straightforward translation into

Arabic. This is correct when they are translated in isolation, or translated into a
topic followed by a comment in an Arabic nominal sentence: e. g.

1. “I am tired”: )‫(أٗب ٓز َؼت‬

2. “She is a nurse”: ٢ٛ(

)‫خ‬ٙ‫ٓٔو‬

3. “They are butchers”: )ٕٝ‫ْ عياه‬ٛ(

However, in Arabic verbal sentences, they can be omitted, unless emphasised,

because there is a letter in the verb which replaces the reference of the pronoun.

Solution: The omission of personal pronouns:

When the sentence is verbal in Arabic, the pronoun (which is the subject) is
deleted because it is included in the verb‟s reference to it as the subject of the
sentence: e.g.

1. “I will contact you later”: )‫ٔب ثؼل‬٤‫ف أرَٖ ثي ك‬ٍٞ(

(The letter (‫ )أ‬in Arabic bears the reference to (I) in English. Therefore there is no
need to repeat the pronoun by saying: ( ‫ف أرَٖ ثي‬ٍٞ ‫أٗب‬
‫ٔب ثؼل‬٤‫))ك‬
2. “She participated in the discussion”: )‫ أُ٘بهْخ‬٢‫(ّبهًذ ك‬

))٢ٛ( is dropped because the last letter (‫ )د‬implies a direct reference to it. Thus, it
is unnecessary to translate it as follows: ٢‫ ّبهًذ ك‬٢ٛ((
)‫أُ٘بهْخ‬

3. “We are expecting someone now”: )ٕ٥‫هغ ّقٖب ً ٓب ا‬ٞ‫(ٗز‬

(It is not required to translate „we‟ literally into (ٖ‫ )ٗؾ‬in Arabic, as the first letter
)ٕ( in the verb (‫هغ‬ٞ‫ )ٗز‬implies it)

Verbs can have a reference to all personal pronouns in Arabic as follows (in
the present and in the past):

Write (present) (‫ٌزت‬٣) (Past) )‫(ًزت‬

I write )‫أًزت(أ‬ I wrote ُ ‫ًزجذ‬

)‫(د‬ ُ

We write )ٕ( ‫ٌٗزت‬ We wrote )‫ًزج٘ب(ٗب‬

You write /ٖ٤‫رٌزج‬/‫رٌزت‬ You wrote )َِ َ‫(د‬/ َ‫ًزَجذ‬/‫ذ‬

ِ ‫ًزج‬

)‫(د‬/ٖ‫رٌزج‬/ٕٞ‫رٌزج‬ )ٕ/ّ/‫ًزجزٖ)ٓب‬/ْ‫ًزجز‬/‫ًزجزٔب‬

He writes )١(‫ٌزت‬٣ He wrote ‫ًزت‬

She writes )‫رٌزت(د‬ She wrote ْ ‫ذ‬

)‫(د‬ ْ ‫ًزج‬

It writes )١-‫ٌزت(د‬٣/‫رٌزت‬ It wrote ْ ‫ًزجذ‬/‫ًزت‬

)‫(د‬ ْ

They write )١(ٖ‫ٌزج‬٣/ٕٞ‫ٌزج‬٣/ٕ‫ٌزجب‬٣ ْ

They wrote )‫د‬/ٕ/‫ا‬ٝ/‫ًزجذ (ا‬/ْٖ
‫ًزج‬/‫ا‬ٞ‫ًزج‬/‫ًزجب‬

(The same reference (‫ )د‬in (‫„ )رٌزت‬you write‟ and „she writes‟ is usually not
confusing in Arabic. Also, the reference of the third person pronoun singular „he‟
(ٞٛ) is absent from (‫ )ًزت‬because it is understood as the implied pronoun (ٞٛ) and
as a root verb in Arabic).

Personal pronouns can also be replaced by both (ٕ‫)ئ‬ ّ and an attached

pronoun)َٖ‫و ٓز‬٤ٔٙ( bearing a reference to the personal pronoun (with a proportion
of emphasis):

I )٢٘ٗ‫(ئ‬

We )‫(ئٗ٘ب‬

You )ٌٖٗ‫ئ‬/ٌْٗ‫ئ‬/‫ئٌٗٔب‬/‫ئٗي‬/‫(ئٗي‬
ِ
He )ٚٗ‫(ئ‬

She )‫ب‬ٜٗ‫(ئ‬

It )‫ب‬ٜٗ‫ئ‬/ٚٗ‫(ئ‬

They )‫ب‬ٜٗ‫ئ‬/ٖٜٗ‫ئ‬/ْٜٗ‫ئ‬/‫ٔب‬ٜٗ‫(ئ‬
1.10: Translation of THE PRESENT PARTICIPLE VS. THE GERUND (-ING):

Both the present participle and the gerund have the same grammatical form in
English: „verb+-ing', but the first is a verb, whereas the second is a noun. All
English main verbs accept the „-ing‟ ending to be changed into nouns (i.e.
gerunds).

Problem: Misunderstanding the two forms:

It is problematic for the students to translate the present participle and the
gerund into Arabic for they find it difficult to distinguish between them in English.
Once they overcome this difficulty, they can translate them properly into Arabic.
The best way to make such a distinction is to substitute them for a noun of any
kind. If the sentence is well-formed grammatically as well as semantically, the „-
ing‟ form is a gerund; if not, it is a present participle.

Solution 1: The noun substitution:

We try first to replace these two forms by a noun in Arabic as follows:

1 .“Eating and drinking all day is unhealthy”: )‫وٌّ ثبُٖؾخ‬ٚٓ ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ‫اُْوة‬ٝ ًَ‫(األ‬

2. “Eating and drinking all day, he had a stomachache”: ٍ‫ا‬ٞٛ ‫اُْوة‬ٝ ًَ‫(األ‬
))‫أُؼلح‬ ٢‫(ك‬ ٔ‫ٓـ‬ ٙ‫ػ٘ل‬ ‫ٕبه‬ ، ّٞ٤ُ‫ا‬

While the first translation is correct both in grammar and meaning, the second
is not acceptable either grammatically or semantically, and resembles two separate,
incomplete expressions: (ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ‫اُْوة‬ٝ ًَ‫ )األ‬and (‫ أُؼلح‬٢‫ ٓـٔ (ك‬ٙ‫)ٕبه ػ٘ل‬.
However, the use of the equivalent present participle in Arabic is possible, yet a
little awkward and, hence, the least acceptable:

1. “Eating and drinking all day, he had a stomachache”: ‫ٕبه‬، ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ً ‫ّبهثب‬ٝ ً‫(آًال‬
ٙ‫ػ٘ل‬ )‫ أُؼلح‬٢‫ٓـٔ (ك‬

Another better solution is the translation of the present participle into a

prepositional phrase (i.e. a preposition and a noun) (‫ه‬ٝ‫ٓغو‬ٝ ‫ )عب ّه‬with the proper
personal pronoun reference:

2. “Eating and drinking all day, he had a stomachache”: ،ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ٚ‫ّوث‬ٝ ًِٚ‫(ٖٓ (ًضوح)أ‬
.)‫ أُؼلح‬٢‫ ٓـٔ (ك‬ٙ‫ٕبه ػ٘ل‬

(The prepositional phrase is (ٖٓ)+(ًِٚ‫ )(ًضوح) أ‬and the personal pronoun reference is
the letter (‫ـ‬ٛ) in (ٚ‫ّوث‬ٝ ًِٚ‫ )أ‬which refers to „he‟):

2. “Eating and drinking all day, he had a stomachache”: ، ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ‫اُْوة‬ٝ ًَ‫(ثَجت األ‬
.)ٔ‫ ٓـ‬ٙ‫ٕبه ػ٘ل‬

(The first word, 'because' is the prepositional phrase which is added at the
beginning to fill in a gap to solve the grammatical problem here).

Solution 2: Verb substitution:

We may also try to change the present participle and the gerund into verbs in
Arabic as follows:
1.“Swimming in cold water in winter is risky”: /‫ اُْزبء ف ِطو‬٢‫ أُبء اُجبهك ك‬٢‫(رَجؼ ك‬

))‫و‬ٛ‫ف ثبُٔقب‬ٞ‫ٓؾل‬

This version is unacceptable in Arabic. Therefore, either a noun or a to-

infinitive would be used instead, as follows:

2.“Swimming in cold water in winter is risky”: /‫و‬ٛ‫كخ ثبُٔقب‬ٞ‫ اُْزبء ٓؾل‬٢‫ أُبء اُجبهك ك‬٢‫(اَُجبؽخ ك‬

)...‫إٔ رَجؼ ثبُٔبء اُجبهك‬

The translation of the gerund into a noun is perhaps the best version in Arabic.

3. “Swimming in cold water in winter, he got cold”: ،‫ اُْزبء‬٢‫ أُبء اُجبهك ك‬٢‫ ٍجؼ ك‬ٚٗ‫(ثٔب أ‬
.)ّ‫ت ثبُيًب‬٤ٕ‫أ‬

Without using a prepositional phrase like )ٚٗ‫( (ثٔب أ‬since/as, etc.), it is not possible to
translate the present participle into a verb only in Arabic.
1.11. Translation of THE PAST PARTICIPLE (pp):

The third form of the verb in English is the past participle. It has different
uses in English and, therefore, has different translations into Arabic.

Problem: The single translation of the "PP" into (ٍٞ‫)اٍْ أُلؼ‬:

Usually the past participle is taken in Arabic to mean (ٍٞ‫ )اٍْ أُلؼ‬only, as follows: „love‟
(‫ؾت‬٣), „loved‟ (‫)أؽت‬, „loved‟(‫ة‬ٞ‫)ٓؾج‬:

1. “She is a loved lady”: (‫ثخ‬ٞ‫لح ٓؾج‬٤ٍ) ‫ب‬ٜٗ‫(ئ‬٢ٛ)

2. “The lady is loved”: (‫ثخ‬ٞ‫لح ٓؾج‬٤َُ‫)ا‬

But this is only one meaning of the pp. Other meanings are assigned to it.

Solution 1: The translation of the pp into a verb:

The past participle is translated into a verb in the past tense in Arabic in two
cases:

a. When used in the present and past perfect tenses (see also „Tenses‟ later): e.g.

1. “The guests have left “(present perfect)”: ( ‫ؿبكه‬/‫ف‬ٞ٤ُٚ‫هل ؿبكه ا‬

َ٤ِ‫ف ٓ٘ن ه‬ٞ٤ُٚ‫)ا‬

(The particle, )‫'(هل‬qad' of the first is used in Arabic to express an action that has just
taken place. The same applies to )َ٤ِ‫' (ٓ٘ن ه‬a short time ago', which is added in
Arabic to distinguish the present perfect tense from the past perfect in particular).
2. “The child had disappeared “(past perfect)”: ( ‫ اُطلَ ٓ٘ن‬٠‫افزل‬/َ‫ اُطل‬٠‫ُول افزل‬
‫)كزوح‬

(The particle, )‫' (ُول‬laqad' of the first version is usually used in Arabic grammar to
indicate an action that took place some time ago in the past. As to )‫' (ٓ٘ن كزوح‬some/ a
long time ago', it is added to the second version to imply in a way the past perfect).
Having said that, the rule for 'qad' and 'laqad' has several exceptions in Arabic.

b. When used in the passive voice in the past (see 3.8. below on passive and
active): e.g.

1. “He was deceived”: )ً ‫ػب‬ٝ‫ًبٕ ٓقل‬/‫( ُفلع‬

2. “We have been surprised by them”: )ْٜ‫عئ٘ب ث‬ٞ‫(ك‬

3. “The meals had been prepared”: )‫عجبد‬ُٞ‫)أُػلد ا‬

Solution „2‟: The translation of the PP into an adjective:

Some verbs do not have independent adjective forms. Therefore, the past
participle is used instead: e.g.

1. “The police arrested the accused person”: )ْٜ‫خ (اُْقٔ) أُز‬ٛ‫(اػزوِذ اُْو‬

2. “I was very pleased”: )ً‫هاً علا‬ٝ‫(ً٘ذ َٓو‬

3. “That is the wanted man”: )‫ة‬ِٞ‫ اُوعَ أُط‬ٞٛ ‫(ماى‬

4. “Let us save the injured(people)”: ))٠‫ٖ(اُغوؽ‬٤‫ٗب َٗبػ ْل (األّقبٓ) أُٖبث‬ٞ‫(كػ‬

 All the adjectives here have the form of (ٍٞ‫ )اٍْ أُلؼ‬in Arabic. This is identical
with the more usual and general version of the translation of the English past
participle in Arabic, referred to in “problem 1” above (see also the next
subsection).
1.12.Translation of ADJECTIVES:

Adjectives in English have quite variable forms. Some of them are

interchangeable with nouns. Above all, they are ordered in the sentence in a way
different from Arabic.

Problem 1: An adjective-noun order in English:

It is a general, well-known rule in English that the adjective occurs before the
noun, whereas in Arabic it comes after the noun.

Solution: Reversing the English adjective-noun order in Arabic:

This solution is easy and known to students: e.g.

1. “Generous people are kind-hearted”: )‫ة‬ِٞ‫ اُو‬ٞ‫ج‬٤ٛ ‫((اُ٘بً) اٌُوٓبء‬

2. “That tall youngman is my cousin”: )٢ٔ‫َ اثٖ ػ‬٣ٞ‫(ماى اُوعَ اُط‬

3. “She likes polite colleagues”: )‫نثبد‬ُٜٔ‫الد ا‬٤ٓ‫(رؾت اُي‬

Problem 2: The ordering of a series of adjectives:

A number of adjectives can follow one another in a certain order in English.

When translated into Arabic, usually the same order is reserved. However,
translating them in the back order is also feasible.
Solution: Translate a series of adjectives either way:

Successive adjectives in English can be translated either from left to right, or

from right to left in Arabic: e. g.

1 .“The English weather may be cloudy, rainy and sunny at the same time”:

)َٚ‫هذ ٗل‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٢‫ؿبئٔبً) ك‬ٝ ً‫وا‬ٛ‫ٓب‬ٝ ‫َْٓٔب ً (َْٓٔب‬ٝ ً‫وا‬ٛ‫ٓب‬ٝ ً ‫ ؿبئِٔب‬١‫ي‬٤ِ‫ٕ اُطوٌ اإلٗغ‬ٌٞ٣ ‫(هل‬

2. “He read a big, popular, useful book”: ))ً‫وا‬٤‫ب ً ًج‬٤‫لاً ّؼج‬٤‫لاً (ٓل‬٤‫ب ً ٓل‬٤‫واًّؼج‬٤‫(هوأ ًزبثب ً ًج‬

3. “Throw that small, round ball”: ))‫وح‬٤‫هح اُٖـ‬ٝ‫هح(أُل‬ٝ‫وح أُل‬٤‫(اهّ رِي اٌُوح اُٖـ‬

Yet, the same English order of adjectives is usually preferred. e. g.

1 2 3

1."The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

(UNESCO)".

)ٌَٞٗٞ٤ُ‫ ا‬: ‫اُضوبكخ‬ٝ ِّٞ‫اُؼ‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤‫(ٓ٘ظٔخ األْٓ أُزؾلح ُِزوث‬

3 2 1
Problem 3: Imitation of the English sequence of adjectives:

At using a number of English adjectives consecutively, a comma is used to

separate them from one another, with „and‟ being used only before the last one.
Many students and translators do the same in Arabic. But the sequence in Arabic is
different, and we have to abide by it.

Solution: The repetition of „and‟, or no „and‟ :

When „and‟ is used before the last adjective in English, it is repeated before
every adjective in Arabic: e. g.

1.“The two ministers discussed the political, social and economic matters”:

)‫خ‬٣‫االهزٖبك‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤‫االعزٔبػ‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤ٍ‫ب‬٤َُ‫ب ا‬٣‫ب‬ٚ‫وإ اُو‬٣‫ى‬ُٞ‫(ٗبهِ ا‬

2. “Her dress is blue, soft, comfortable and cheap”: ‫ؼ‬٣‫ٓو‬ٝ ْ‫ٗبػ‬ٝ ‫ب أىهم‬ٜ‫ث‬ٞ‫(ص‬
)ٔ٤‫هف‬ٝ

But when „and‟ is not used in English, it may either be dropped, or retained in
Arabic, as follows: e. g.

1.“Lucy is an innocent, good, kind girl”: )‫لخ‬٤‫ُط‬ٝ ‫جخ‬٤ٛٝ ‫ئخ‬٣‫ كزبح ثو‬٢ٍُٞ/‫لخ‬٤‫جخ ُط‬٤ٛ ‫ئخ‬٣‫ كزبح ثو‬٢ٍُٞ(

2.“Mohammad prefers simple, homely, tasty food”:

))‫ن‬٣‫اُِن‬ٝ ‫ف‬ُٞ‫أُأ‬ٝ(/‫ن‬٣‫ف اُِن‬ُٞ‫ أُأ‬ٜ٤َ‫َ ٓؾٔل اُطؼبّ اُج‬ٚ‫ل‬٣(

Problem 4: The use of adjectives as nouns:

 Adjectives can be used as collective nouns in English when preceded by „the‟
and not followed by nouns: e g.

1. “poor people” → “the poor”

2. “elderly people” → “the elderly”

3. “handicapped people” → “the handicapped”

(This is a general rule in English).

Some students may confuse such a special use of adjectives as singular nouns
or adjectives in Arabic.

Solution: „The+adjective‟ → plural noun in Arabic:

Adjectives used as collective nouns are translated into plural nouns in Arabic,
not into adjectives or singular nouns: e. g.

1.“The rich should help the poor = rich people should help poor people”:

)‫ا اُلوواء‬ٝ‫َبػل‬٣ ٕ‫بء أ‬٤٘‫ األؿ‬٠ِ‫غت ػ‬٣(

(We cannot translate „the rich‟ into (٢٘‫ )اُـ‬or „the poor‟ into (‫و‬٤‫))اُلو‬

2. “The elderly are wiser than the young‟=the elderly people are wiser than the
young people”:(‫ٕ أػوَ ٖٓ اُْجبة‬َُٞ٘ٔ‫)ا‬.

“People' is included both in „the elderly‟ and (َُٕٞ٘ٔ‫)ا‬.

3. “The handicapped can do many things „=‟the handicapped people can do many
things”: (‫وح‬٤‫بء ًض‬٤ّ‫ا أ‬ِٞ‫لؼ‬٣ ٕ‫ٕ أ‬ٞ‫غ أُؼبه‬٤‫َزط‬٣)

„The handicapped‟ cannot be translated into (‫ (ٓؼبم‬because the noun singular in

English is „a handicap‟.
1.13. Translation of TENSES:

In English, there are over fourteen tenses, the most common of which are
twelve: Simple tenses, perfect tenses, progressive tenses, and perfect progressive
tenses in the present (4), in the past (4), and in the future(4). Most of them have no
precise equivalents in Arabic which has only two tenses, the present )‫بهع‬ُٚٔ‫ (ا‬and
the past )٢ٙ‫( (أُب‬the imperative is not form, not a tense). This causes a few
problems to the students of translation, for some English tenses are difficult and
can be confused when rendered into Arabic. The following discussion gives an
account of some of these problems, and suggests possible solutions to them in
regard to the main tenses in particular. The discussion is based on comparing the
major differences between English and Arabic grammars in this respect, and the
semantic implications of that, making it easier for the students to translate by
understanding the techniques of both languages here.

Problem 1: The present and the past perfect tenses:

These two tenses have no one-to-one equivalents in Arabic. This causes a

problem to students who try hard to convey the exact time of action implied in
these two tenses. Some translators suggest (‫ )هل‬for the present perfect and (‫ )ُول‬for
the past perfect, to precede the verb in the past(see also 1.11. above). This is a
likely solution, but there are exceptions for this rule, for either particle can be used
with any kind of verb in the near or far past.(Examples can be traced in the Holy
Quran). Other words like (َ٤ِ‫هجَ ه‬/ٞ‫ )ُِز‬for 'qad', and ))ٖٓ‫ (هجَ ٓلح (ٖٓ اُي‬for 'laqad'
have been suggested to indicate these two tenses. However, this can be an optional
solution.

Solution: The present and past perfect=past tense:

 The direct, easy and proper way of translating theses two tenses is to regard
them exactly as past tenses. The following three examples are given one translation
in Arabic:

1.“We heard the news (past simple)”:

2.“We have heard the news (present perfect)”: )‫ُول ٍٔؼ٘ب) األفجبه‬/‫(ٍٔؼ٘ب (هل‬

3.“We had heard the news (past perfect)”:

Thus, the present and the past perfect tenses are both treated as past simple,
and translated into the past tense in Arabic, with or without )‫ (هل‬or )‫(ُول‬.

Problem 2: The present and the past progressives:

These two tenses also have no equivalents in Arabic. Therefore, students

could find them problematic in translation when they insist on literal transmission.

Solution 1: Present progressive=present tense:

Simply, the present progressive (am/is/are+ing) is translated into the present

tense in Arabic. The only way to indicate the time of this tense in it is to use a
word like „now‟ (ٕ٥‫ )ا‬in English: e. g.
1. “They are working hard”:
)‫ٕ ثغل‬ِٞٔ‫ؼ‬٣)ْٜٗ‫(ئ‬

2. “The wind is blowing now”:

)ٕ٥‫ؼ ا‬٣‫ت اُو‬ٜ‫(ر‬

3. “Joseph is writing an essay these days”: )ّ‫ب‬٣‫ األ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ‫ق ٓوبُخ‬٣‫ى‬ٞ‫ٌزت ع‬٣(

Fewer examples can be translated into topic and comment: e. g.

1. “The pilgrims are leaving for Makkah Al-Mukarramah”: ٕٝ‫(اُؾغبط ٓـبكه‬

)‫ ٌٓخ أٌُوٓخ‬٠ُ‫ئ‬

2. “We are listening to you”:

)‫ي‬٤ُ‫ٕ ئ‬ٞ‫(ٗؾٖ(ئٗ٘ب)ٖٓـ‬

Yet, in some examples, the two translations in Arabic are different: e. g.

1. “He is dying”: )‫و‬َٚ‫ُؾز‬٣/‫د‬ٞٔ٣)ٚٗ‫(ئ‬

“We cannot say (‫ذ‬٤ٓ)ٚٗ‫(ئ‬ٞٛ) because it means he is no longer alive, whereas the
first version means he is still breathing, and may become healthy and well again.

There is one common feature among all these examples, that is, the disregard
of „verb be‟.

Solution 2: Past progressive=(ٕ‫)ًب‬+present tense:

 The past progressive (was/were+ing) is translated into (ٕ‫ )ًب‬and the present
simple of the verb in Arabic: e.g.

1. “His son was playing football”: ٚ٘‫(ًبٕ اث‬

)ّ‫ِؼت ًوح هل‬٣

2. “The horses were jumping”: ‫(ًبٗذ‬

)‫ٍ رولي‬ٞ٤‫اُق‬

3. “the athletes were running fast”: ٕٝ‫(ًبٕ اُؼلاؤ‬

)‫ٕ ثَوػخ‬ٝ‫غو‬٣

Here verb „be‟ is translated into (ٕ‫ )ًب‬in Arabic. It is always translated like this
when it occurs in the past simple in English.

Problem 3: Present and past perfect progressive tenses:

These two English tenses are quite complex for students to understand and,
therefore, to translate into Arabic, for they have no equivalent in Arabic grammar.
Thus, students try in vain to find identical versions for them. By insisting on
translating them literally, they produce broken, poor translations: e.g.

1.“The soldiers have been fighting all day”(present perfect progressive):

)ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ِٕٞ‫وبر‬٣ ٕٞ٘‫ك ًبئ‬ٞ٘‫(اُغ‬

2. “The tailor had been sewing all night” (past perfect progressive):
 )ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ٜ٤‫ق‬٣ ً ‫ ًبئ٘ب‬ٛ‫ب‬٤‫(ًبٕ اُق‬

(The use of (ٕ‫)ًب‬is to indicate the past).

But these translations are awkward grammatically as well as semantically.

Solution: Both tenses are translatable into(ٕ‫ )ًب‬+present tense:

Like the past progressive, the present perfect progressive (has/have+been+ing

and the past perfect progressive (had+been+ing)are translated into (ٕ‫ )ًب‬and the
present tense in Arabic, as follows:

1. “The soldiers have been fighting all day”: ‫ك‬ٞ٘‫(ًبٕ اُغ‬

ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ِٕٞ‫وبر‬٣

2. “The tailor had been sewing all night”: ٛ‫ب‬٤‫(ًبٕ اُق‬

)َ٤ُِ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ٜ٤‫ق‬٣

Problem 4: The translation of the future past:

The future tense in the past is problematic and discussed in the next point (see
conditional sentences)

Problem 5: The future progressive (will/shall+be+ing):

This tense is less problematic than the future past to students. Yet, translating it
literally, students commit a mistake when they come to the main verb (the verb
with the -ing): e.g.
1. “I shall be sleeping”: )ّ‫ٕ أٗب‬ًٞ‫ف أ‬ٍٞ(

2. “The banks will be closing all day”: )ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ ‫ٕ أُٖبهف رـِن‬ٌٞ‫ف ر‬ٍٞ(

3..“The party will be continuing until 3 a.m.”: ً ‫ ٕجبؽب‬3 ‫ اَُبػخ‬٠‫ٕ اُؾلِخ رَزٔو ؽز‬ٌٞ‫ف ر‬ٍٞ(

It is not allowed in Arabic grammar to have the sequence: „present-present‟

)‫بهع‬ٚٓ-‫بهع‬ٚٓ(: )ّ‫ٕ أٗب‬ًٞ‫(أ‬,)‫ٕ رـِن‬ٌٞ‫(ر‬,)‫ٕ رَزٔو‬ٌٞ‫(ر‬.

Therefore, it is not correct and should be changed, as suggested by the following

solution:

Solution: The future progressive: (ٌٕٞ٣)+present participle (َ‫ )اٍْ اُلبػ‬present only:

Two choices are available for the translation of this tense: Either into verb
„Be” in the present + the present participle of the main verb; or simply into present.
Both are preceded by the future particle ‫ف‬ٍٞ/‫(ٍـ‬, as illustrated by the following
three examples:

1. “I shall be sleeping”: )ّ‫ف أٗب‬ٍٞ/ ً ‫ٕ ٗبئٔب‬ًٞ‫ف أ‬ٍٞ(

2. “The banks will be closing all day”: ‫ٓولِخ (ٍزولَ أُٖبهف‬/‫ٕ أُٖبهف ٓـِوخ‬ٌٞ‫ف ر‬ٍٞ(

ّٞ٤ُ‫اٍ ا‬ٞٛ))‫ب‬ٜ‫اث‬ٞ‫(أث‬

3. “The party will be continuing until three o‟clock a.m.”:

)ً‫ اَُبػخ اُضبُضخ ٕجبؽب‬٠‫ف رَزٔو اُؾلِخ ؽز‬ٍٞ/ ‫ٕ اُؾلِخ َٓزٔوح‬ٌٞ‫ف ر‬ٍٞ(
Problem 6: The future perfect (shall/will+have+PP)

It is not easy for students to translate the reference of the future perfect.
Usually, they resort to literal translation, which might lead to slightly awkward
Arabic: e.g.

1. “Several persons will have left by then”: )‫ا ػ٘لئ ٍن‬ٝ‫ٕ ػلح أّقبٓ ؿبكه‬ٌٞ٤ٍ(

2. “The cook will have prepared lunch”: ‫ أػل‬٢ٛ‫ٕ اُطب‬ٌٞ٤ٍ(

)‫اُـلاء‬

Solution: The future perfect: (‫)هل‬+past/ (٠ٜ‫ )هل اٗز‬followed by the prepositional
phrase:

(ٖٓ)+ a noun: e. g.

1. “Several persons will have left by then”: )‫ا ػ٘لئن‬ٝ‫ٕ ػلح أّقبٓ هل ؿبكه‬ٌٞ٣ ‫ف‬ٍٞ(

2. “The cook will have prepared lunch”: )‫ ٖٓ ئػلاك اُـلاء‬٠ٜ‫اٗز‬/‫ هل أػل اُـلاء‬٢ٛ‫ٕ اُطب‬ٌٞ٣ ‫ف‬ٍٞ(

Obviously, these translations seem unusual, even awkward. Yet, they reflect the
awkward,complex tense of the original.
Summary of the translation of the English main tenses into Arabic:

English Arabic

1. present simple

2.Present progresssive present )‫بهع‬ٚٓ(

3. past simple

4. present perfect past )ٗ‫(ٓب‬

5. past perfect

6. past progressive

7. present perfect prog. were+present )‫بهع‬ٚٓ+ٕ‫(ًب‬

8. past perfect progressive

1.14: Translation of CONDITIONAL SENTENCES:

There are three types of conditional sentences in English, but only two in
Arabic. The main problem here is the translation of the future past „would have‟
into Arabic. Students might try to match the reference of the English future past: e.
g.

1.“If you finish work early, I will visit you”: ‫ف‬َٞ‫ اُؼَٔ ثبًواً ك‬٢ٜ٘‫(ئما ر‬
)‫هى‬ٝ‫أى‬

2.“If you finished work early, I would visit you”: ‫ف‬َٞ‫ ك‬،ً‫ذ اُؼَٔ ثبًوا‬٤ٜٗ‫(ئما أ‬
)‫ىهري‬

3.“If you had finished early, I would have visited you”:

)‫ف ً٘ذ ىهري‬َٞ‫ ك‬، ً‫ذ اُؼَٔ ثبًوا‬٤ٜٗ‫(ئما أ‬

The three translations are unacceptable in Arabic grammar for )‫(ئما‬.cannot be

followed by the present(1), and )‫ف‬ٍٞ( does not precede the past(2,3).

Solution: Two versions in Arabic only:

The English conditional sentences are translated into only two types in
Arabic:

1 .The real/possible future present (Arabic sequence: if+past/will+present): e.g.

1.“If you finish work early, I will visit you”: ، ً‫ذ اُؼَٔ ثبًوا‬٤ٜٗ‫(ئما أ‬
)‫هى‬ٝ‫ف أى‬َٞ‫ك‬

„If‟ )‫ (ئما‬in Arabic is usually followed by the past whether the reference is to
the past or to the future. However, „if‟ as )ُٞ( can be followed by the present:

2.“If you finish work early, I will visit you”: ، ً‫ اُؼَٔ ثبًوا‬٢ٜ٘‫ ر‬ُٞ(
)‫هى‬ٝ‫ف أى‬َٞ‫ك‬

2. The unreal past (Arabic sequence: if+past+past): e.g.

“If you finished work early, I would visit you”: ً‫ذ اُؼَٔ ثبًوا‬٤ٜٗ‫ أ‬ُٞ(
)‫ُيهري‬

(The additional letter „l‟ (‫ )َُـ‬in (‫ )ُيهري‬replaces „would‟. At the same time, (‫ف‬ٍٞ)
disappears completely in the past.)

3. Impossible unreal past (Arabic sequence: if+past+)‫(َُـ‬+past of )ٕ‫(ًب‬+past)

“If you had finished work early, I would have visited you”:

)‫ٌُ٘ذ ىهري‬/‫ ُيهري‬،ً‫ذ اُؼَٔ ثبًوا‬٤ٜٗ‫(أٗي) أ‬ُٞ(

(‫ )ٌُ٘ذ ىهري‬may be more precise here than (‫)ُيهري‬. That is, it distinguishes „3‟ from
„2‟ above in terms of far possibility for the latter, but impossibility for the former,
although both are unreal past. However, this is probably artificial. In both cases,
the past is more safely used, and (‫ف‬ٍٞ) is replaced with (‫ )ُـ‬in combination with
(‫)ً٘ذ‬.

1.15. Translation and CHANGE OF WORD CLASSES:

The grammatical classes (or categories) of words in English are: nouns, verbs,
adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, articles and connectors (or conjunctions). When a
noun is translated into a verb, an adjective into a noun, an adverb into an adjective,
etc., the word class is changed. This creates one or two problems for the students.
Problem 1: Adjectives as nouns:

Usually English adjectives are translated into equivalent adjectives in Arabic.

The problem for the students is the application of this as a fixed rule to the
translation of all adjectives in both languages. But the case is not always so.

Solution: adjectives → adjectives/nouns:

Adjectives are translated into adjectives or nouns in Arabic:e. g.

1. “The presidential palace”: ‫هٖو‬/ ٢ٍ‫(اُوٖو اُوئب‬

)‫اُوئبٍخ‬

2. “ The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

(UNESCO)”: ِّٞ‫اُؼ‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤‫(ٓ٘ظٔخ األْٓ أُزؾلح ُِزوث‬

)ٌَٞٗٞ٤ُ‫اُضوبكخ(ا‬ٝ

(This example does not have another translation into adjectives ).

3. “Political, administrative and economical affairs”:

)‫االهزٖبك‬ٝ ‫اإلكاهح‬ٝ ‫بٍخ‬٤َُ‫ٕ ا‬ٝ‫ّإ‬/‫خ‬٣‫االهزٖبك‬ٝ ‫خ‬٣‫اإلكاه‬ٝ ‫خ‬٤ٍ‫ب‬٤َُ‫ٕ ا‬ٝ‫(اُْإ‬

Problem 2: Nouns as adjectives:

Nouns can be used as adjectives in English. They might cause a problem to

students.

Solution: Nouns → nouns/adjectives:

 The choice is between translating some English nouns into nouns or
adjectives in

Arabic: e.g.

1. “The status quo”: ‫غ‬ُٙٞ‫(ا‬

)ٖٛ‫اُوا‬

2. “Gas cylinder”: ‫اٗخ‬ٞ‫أٍط‬/‫اٗخ ؿبى‬ٞ‫(أٍط‬

)‫خ‬٣‫ؿبى‬

3. “Nerve cell”: ‫خ‬٤ِ‫ف‬/‫خ أػٖبة‬٤ِ‫(ف‬

)‫خ‬٤‫ػٖج‬

4. “Steam engine”: ‫هطبه‬/‫(هطبه ثقبه‬

)١‫ثقبه‬

5. “Music concert”: )‫خ‬٤‫و‬٤ٍٞٓ ‫(ؽلِخ‬

6. “Television programme”: )١‫(ثوٗبٓظ رِلبى‬

(“Television programmes”) )‫خ‬٣‫ثوآظ رِلبى‬/‫(ثوآظ اُزِلبى‬

7. “the attorney general” ٢ٓ‫أُؾب‬/‫بثخ‬٤ُ٘‫َ ا‬٤ًٝ/ّ‫اُ٘بئت اُؼب‬/‫بح‬ٚ‫ اُو‬٢ٙ‫(هب‬

)ٍٝ‫األ‬

8. “Bank account”: )٢‫(ؽَبة ٖٓوك‬

9. “Office equipment”: )‫ياد ٌٓزت‬٤ٜ‫رغ‬/‫خ‬٤‫ياد ٌٓزج‬٤ٜ‫(رغ‬

10.“Ring road”: ))٢‫ (ؽِو‬١‫ن كائو‬٣‫و‬ٛ(

It is clear from these examples that most of the phrases have more than one
version of translation each, some of which are identical with English, some are not
in this regard. More interesting is the translation of „Quranic verses‟ into both ‫بد‬٣‫(آ‬
،)ْ٣‫بد ٖٓ اُووإٓ اٌُو‬٣‫آ‬/‫خ‬٤ٗ‫( هوآ‬i.e.„noun+adjective‟, and „prepositional phrase‟), but
„Quranic Chapters‟ cannot accept but one version that has become a collocation in
Arabic nowadays, namely, )ْ٣‫ه ٖٓ اُووإٓ اٌُو‬ٍٞ( (Chapters from the Holy Quran).
Usually we do not come across )‫خ‬٤ٗ‫ه هوآ‬ٍٞ( at least in formal writings and
discourses .

Problem 3. Nouns as verbs:

English nouns are usually translated into nouns, or at times into adjectives in
Arabic. However, a noun can be translated into a verb too.

Solution: Nouns → nouns/verbs:

The majority of English nouns are translated into nouns or adjectives. Yet,
some of them would accept translations into verbs in Arabic: e.g.

1.“Keeping indoors for a long time is boring”:

)َٔٓ ‫ء‬٢ّ ‫ِخ‬٣ٞٛ ‫ذ ُٔلح‬٤‫ اُج‬٢‫ ك‬٠‫إٔ رجو‬/َٔٓ ‫ِخ‬٣ٞٛ ‫ذ ُٔلح‬٤‫ اُج‬٢‫(اُجوبء ك‬

2. “May I take my leave”:

)٢ُ ‫ا‬ٞ‫أٍؾ‬/ٕ‫(أٍزأم‬

3. “Attention/pay attention”:
)‫ا‬ٜٞ‫اٗزج‬/ٚ‫(اٗزج‬

4. “They gave their agreement”: ‫ا‬ٞ‫(أػط‬

)‫ا‬ٞ‫اكو‬ٝ/ْٜ‫اكوز‬ٞٓ

5. “He is a convert to Islam”: ‫اػز٘ن‬/ّ‫ اإلٍال‬٠ُ‫ ئ‬ٟ‫زل‬ٛ‫(ا‬

)ّ‫كفَ اإلٍال‬/ٍِْ‫أ‬/ّ‫اإلٍال‬
Problem 4: Verbs as nouns:

Generally speaking, main verbs in English are usually translated into verbs in
Arabic. But some can be changed into nouns.

Solution: Verbs→ verbs/nouns:

Moreover, some verbs may have two versions in Arabic: verbs and nouns: e. g.

1. “I am going home”: ٠ُ‫ت ئ‬ٛ‫(أٗب ما‬

)‫ذ‬٤‫ اُج‬٠ُ‫ت ئ‬ٛ‫أم‬/‫ذ‬٤‫اُج‬

2. “English is easy to understand”: ‫خ‬٣‫ي‬٤ِ‫اإلٗغ‬/ْٜ‫ِخ اُل‬ٍٜ ‫خ‬٣‫ي‬٤ِ‫(اإلٗغ‬

)ْٜ‫ِخ" إٔ رُل‬ٍٜ

3. „We are ready to buy the house”: ‫ٕ)ُْواء‬ٝ‫ٕ(َٓزؼل‬ٝ‫ي‬ٛ‫(ٗؾٖ عب‬

)ٍ‫ أُ٘ي‬١‫ُْ٘زو‬/ٍ‫أُ٘ي‬

4. “To make use of time, Nada prays”: ٢ِٖ‫ ر‬،‫هذ‬ُٞ‫ل ٖٓ ا‬٤‫ رَزل‬٢ٌُ/‫(ُالٍزلبكح‬
)‫ّ ثبُٖالح‬ٞ‫رو‬/ٟ‫ٗل‬

5. “The president leaves for India today”: ٌ٤‫اُوئ‬/ّٞ٤ُ‫٘ل ا‬ُٜ‫ ا‬٠ُ‫ٌ ئ‬٤‫ـبكه اُوئ‬٣(
)ّٞ٤ُ‫٘ل ا‬ُٜ‫ ا‬٠ُ‫ٓـبك ٌه ئ‬

Usually, the first versions of these pairs are natural and recurrent, whereas the
second versions -especially '2' and '5'- are artificial, poor and awkward. Therefore,
the students are not advised to use them, despite their possible use in Arabic
grammar.
1.16. Translation of ARTICLES:

There are two articles in English:

1. The definite article „the‟: )‫ق‬٣‫(أَُـ اُزؼو‬

2. the indefinite article „a/an‟: )‫(أكاح اٌُ٘وح‬

In Arabic, however, there is only one article, the definite article. No

equivalent is available for the indefinite article. The problem is not with this
difference of articles between the two languages, but in the use of the definite
article „the‟ in Arabic.

Problem 1: the translation of „the‟:

It is obvious that the use of „the‟ is usually brought to a minimum in English.

Moreover, in general and abstract words, for instance, „the‟ is implied, not
mentioned, but in Arabic it is mentioned. On the other hand, in the genitive case
(‫بكخ‬ٙ‫„ )اإل‬the‟ is mentioned before each of the two nouns in English, whereas in
Arabic it is used only before the second noun.

Solution 1: Zero article → definite article:

In English, general and abstract nouns are used without articles, but in Arabic
they are preceded by the definite article )‫(اُـ‬, as the following examples illustrate:

1. “Man is a speaking animal” (general):

)‫ن‬ٛ‫إ ٗب‬ٞ٤‫(اإلَٗبٕ ؽ‬

2. “Philosophy is my favourite subject”(abstract):

)‫ِخ‬ٚ‫ أُل‬٢‫(اُلَِلخ ٓبكر‬
3. “Keep medicine out of children‟s reach”(abstract): ٖ‫اء ػ‬ٝ‫(أثؼل اُل‬
)ٍ‫لب‬ٛ‫ٍ األ‬ٝ‫ٓز٘ب‬

(Notice also the general noun “children”, which is not preceded by an

article in English,

yet (‫ )اُـ‬is used in Arabic).

4. “Scientists work day and night‟ (general): َٔ‫ؼ‬٣(

)‫به‬ٜٗ َ٤ُ ‫اُؼِٔبء‬

5. “Prayer is an obligation”(abstract):
)‫خ‬ٚ٣‫(اُٖالح كو‬

6. “Man-made shoes are of a high quality”(general): ً ‫ب‬٣ٝ‫ل‬٣ ‫ػخ‬ُٖٞ٘ٔ‫خ ا‬٣‫(األؽن‬

)‫خ‬٤ُ‫كح ػب‬ٞ‫ماد ع‬

7. “Ladies like good manners”(general;abstract): ‫لاد‬٤َُ‫(رؾت ا‬

)َٖ‫ى اُؾ‬َُِٞ‫ا‬

8. “Translators may commit mistakes (general): ‫ورٌت‬٣ ‫(هل‬

)‫ٕ أفطبء‬ٞٔ‫أُزوع‬

9. “Is translation easy or difficult ?”(abstract): ‫َ اُزوعٔخ‬ٛ(

)‫ِخ أّ ٕؼجخ؟‬ٍٜ

10. “Domestic animals are useful and harmless”(general): ‫لخ‬٤ُ‫اٗبد األ‬ٞ٤‫(اُؾ‬

)‫بهح‬ٙ ‫و‬٤‫ؿ‬ٝ ‫لح‬٤‫ٓل‬
In fact, there are examples where the definite article is not used in either language:
e.g.

1. “We have grammar now”(abstract):

)ٕ٥‫اػل ا‬ٞ‫(ػ٘لٗب ه‬

2. “His father teaches physics”(abstract):

)‫بء‬٣‫ي‬٤‫ ك‬ٙ‫اُل‬ٝ ً‫له‬٣(

3. “Mona drinks milk in the morning”(abstract): ً ‫جب‬٤ِ‫ ؽ‬٠٘ٓ ‫(رْوة‬

)‫ اُٖجبػ‬٢‫(ُج٘ب ً) ك‬

Yet the greater number of the general and abstract nouns take „the‟ in Arabic.

Solution 2: „the genitive‟ → „genitive‟ in Arabic:

The definite article is used twice in the English „of-genitive‟, but only once in
the Arabic translation for the genitive replaces the second definite article : e. g.

1. “The Organization of the United Nations”: ‫(ٓ٘ظٔخ‬

)‫األْٓ أُزؾلح‬

2. “The singing of the birds”:

)‫ه‬ٞ٤‫(ؿ٘بء اُط‬

3. “The man of the match”: َٚ‫أك‬/‫(ٗغْ أُجبهاح‬

)‫ أُجبهاح‬٢‫الػت ك‬

In the case of an indefinite genitive, the Arabic translation is identical: e. g.

1. “ He is a man of confidence”: َ‫)هع‬ٚٗ‫(ئ‬ٞٛ(

)‫صوخ‬/‫م‬ٞ‫ص‬ٞٓ

2. “We gave a word of honour”:

)‫٘ب ًِٔخ ّوف‬٤‫(أػط‬

3. “It is a story of black magic”:

)‫مح‬ٞ‫ب هٖخ ّؼ‬ٜٗ‫(ئ‬

Like the definite article, the definite genitive functions as a specifier for
something or somebody in particular, whereas the indefinite genitive is similar to
the indefinite article, specifying nothing or nobody in particular. This applies to
both languages. Therefore, either use of the genitive in English is preferably
reproduced in Arabic for reasons of specification or non-specification, which may
sometimes make a considerable difference of meaning.

Thus, it is not advisable to undermine such a translation problem of definte

and indefinite articles. Indeed, sometimes it is too crucial to meaning to drop the
definite article or to keep it, as illustrated in the following two versions of the
notorious Security Counil's Resolution, 242, after the Zionist Israeli war against the
neighbouring Arab Countries in June, 1967:

A. (The English version): "Withdrawal (of Israeli forces) from Arab Occupied
Territories."

B. (The French version): "Withdrawal (of Israeli forces) from the Arab
Occupied Territories."

A long dispute has been going on between the Arabs and the Zionists about
the two versions, as the first(without 'the') is adopted by the Israelis for it is
interpreted as 'withdrwal from some Arab occupied territories', whereas the second
version(with 'the') is adopted by the Arabs as it means 'withdrawal from all Arab
occupied territories'. The difference is obviously big between 'some' and 'all'.
1.17. Translation of CONJUNCTIONS: SENTENCE CONNECTORS

Conjunctions (or Sentence Connectors) are the words or the phrases used to
connect sentences together. They usually occur at the beginning of sentences, with
possible occasional variations of position in the middle, or at the end of them.

It is hard to imagine a text of two or more sentences without some

conjunctions used to connect its parts (i.e. sentences) with one another. Here is an
example.

“English is relatively a modern language. Arabic is one of the ancient

languages. Perhaps it is the oldest language on earth. More evidence

is required to confirm that”.

Here we have independent statements rather than a united text, for sentence
connectors which bring about this unity are left out. Consequently, translating them
into Arabic as such will have an equally disintegrated text, as follows:

ّ‫ٕ أهل‬ٌٞ‫ هثٔب ر‬.‫ٔخ‬٣‫ اُِـبد اُول‬ٟ‫خ ئؽل‬٤‫ رؼل اُؼوث‬.‫ل‬ٜ‫ضخ اُؼ‬٣‫ب ً ُـخ ؽل‬٤‫خ َٗج‬٣‫ي‬٤ِ‫(رؼزجو اُِـخ اإلٗغ‬

)‫ة ُِزؾون ٖٓ مُي‬ِٞ‫ل ٖٓ األكُخ ٓط‬٣‫ ٓي‬.ٗ‫ األه‬ٚ‫ع‬ٝ ٠ِ‫ُـخ ػ‬

We feel that something is missing in between the sentences. Therefore,

comprehension of the text as one whole unit is obstructed. By contrast, the
provision of proper sentence connectors makes the text one organic unit that can be
easily comprehended. (Sentence connectors are underlined):

“English is relatively a modern language. On the other hand, Arabic is an

ancient language. Not only this, perhaps it is the oldest language on earth.
 However, more evidence is required to confirm that”.

The connectors, „on the other hand‟, „not only this‟ and „however‟, are inserted in
between sentences to compose a unified text. The same can be said about the
Arabic translation:

،‫نا كؾَت‬ٛ ٌ٤ُ .ً‫ٔخ علا‬٣‫خ ُـخ هل‬٤‫ رؼزجو اُؼوث‬،ٟ‫خ أفو‬٤‫ ٖٓ ٗبؽ‬. ‫ل‬ٜ‫ضخ اُؼ‬٣‫ب ً ُـخ ؽل‬٤‫خ َٗج‬٣‫ي‬٤ِ‫(رؼزجو اإلٗغ‬

.)‫ل ٖٓ األكُخ ُِزؾون ٖٓ مُي‬٣‫ ٓي‬٠ُ‫٘بى ؽبعخ ئ‬ٛ ٍ‫خ ؽب‬٣‫ أ‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬.ٗ‫ األه‬ٚ‫ع‬ٝ ٠ِ‫ أهلّ ُـخ ػ‬٢ٛ ‫هثٔب‬

The connectors: )ٍ‫خ ؽب‬٣‫ أ‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬،‫نا كؾَت‬ٛ ٌ٤ُ ،ٟ‫خ أفو‬٤‫ )ٖٓ ٗبؽ‬are employed to unite
these sentences into one comprehensible text.

Having established the vital importance of conjunctions in language, it is

possible now to introduce their main types. For the convenience of simplification, I
adopt Halliday and Hasan‟s (1976) division of conjunctions into four major kinds
(see also Quirk et al (1973), Nash, (1980) and Ghazala (1994) for more details and
different points of focus):

1. Additive conjunctions: e.g.

„and, also, or, furthermore, in addition, besides, beside that, alternatively, likewise,
similarly, in the same way, for instance, for, that is, I mean, etc.‟

-And )ٝ( ‫ؽوف اُؼطق‬-

-Also ً ‫ب‬ٚ٣‫أ‬-

-Or ٝ‫أ‬-
-Then

-Further, furthermore, moreover ‫ثؼل مُي‬/‫ثؼلئن‬/ْ‫ص‬-

-In addition ‫م مُي‬ٞ‫ك‬/‫ مُي‬٠ِ‫ح ػ‬ٝ‫ػال‬-

-Besides ‫ مُي‬٠ُ‫ق ئ‬ٙ‫أ‬/‫ مُي‬٠ُ‫بكخ ئ‬ٙ‫ثبإل‬-

-Beside that ‫ مُي‬٠ُ‫بكخ ئ‬ٙ‫ثبإل‬-

-Alternatively ‫ مُي‬٠ُ‫بكخ ئ‬ٙ‫ثبإل‬/‫ عبٗت مُي‬٠ُ‫ئ‬-

‫ثلٍ مُي‬/‫بً) ػٖ مُي‬ٙٞ‫ثلالً(ػ‬-

-Likewise َ‫ثبُٔض‬ٝ-

-Similarly/in a similar way, ‫خ‬ٜ‫خ ْٓبث‬٣‫ثطو‬/َ‫ثبُٔض‬ٝ-

-In the same way, by the same token َ‫ثبُٔض‬/‫وخ ٓٔبصِخ‬٣‫ثطو‬-

-For instance/for example, to ً‫وة ُنُي ٓضال‬ُٚ٘ٝ/ً‫ٓضال‬/ٍ‫َ أُضب‬٤‫ ٍج‬٠ِ‫ػ‬-

give(cite) an example, etc.
٢٘‫ؼ‬٣ ‫مُي‬/‫ مُي‬٢٘‫ؼ‬٣/‫ مُي‬٠٘‫ٓؼ‬/١‫أ‬-
-That is, I mean, namely, viz.
.‫ئُـ‬
etc.

These conjunctions are used to add more information and details by way of
addition (using: „and, also, besides, beside that, moreover, further, furthermore, in
addition‟); alternation (using: „or, alternatively, instead, rather‟); exemplification
(by means of: „for example, for instance, a case in point, to give(cite) an example,
etc.‟); explanation (using: „that is, I mean, namely, viz. etc.‟), or resemblance
(using: „likewise, similarly, in a similar way, in the same way, by the same token,
etc.‟).
2. Contrastive conjunctions: e.g.

“But, however, yet, though, although, nevertheless, nonetheless, despite that,

in spite of, instead, rather, on the one hand … on the other, on the other hand, on
the contrary, in fact, actually, well, as a matter of fact, in any case, anyhow, at any
rate, after all, above all, it is true that, etc.”:

-But ّ ٠ِ‫ػ‬/ٌُٖ/
)ٕ‫ئال إٔ(ئ‬/ٕ‫ل أ‬٤‫ث‬/ٕ‫أ‬ ّ ٌُْٖ -

-However ْ -
‫ٌٖ ٖٓ أٓو‬٣ ‫ٔب‬ٜٓ/ٍ‫خ ؽب‬٣‫ أ‬٠ِ‫ػ‬/ٌُٖ

-Yet

-Though, although, ْ -
ٍ‫خ ؽب‬٣‫ أ‬٠ِ‫ػ‬/‫ٓغ مُي‬ٝ/ٌُٖ
nevertheless, nonetheless,
٠ِ‫ػ‬/‫نا‬ٛ ‫ٓغ‬/‫ٓغ مُي‬ٝ/‫ثوؿْ مُي‬-
despite that, in spite of, albeit,
having said that ‫اُوؿْ ٖٓ مُي‬

-Instead, rather ٟ‫ثبألؽو‬/‫ثلالً ػٖ مُي‬/‫ب ً ػٖ مُي‬ٙٞ‫ػ‬-

-On the one hand … on the ‫خ‬ٜ‫ع‬/‫خ‬٤‫ٖٓ ٗبؽ‬...)‫خ‬ٜ‫ع‬/‫خ‬٤‫ٖٓ ٗبؽ‬-
other(hand) ٟ‫أفو‬

-On the other hand )ٟ‫خ) أفو‬ٜ‫خ (ٖٓ ع‬٤‫ٖٓ ٗبؽ‬-

-On the contrary )‫ اُؼٌٌ(ٖٓ مُي‬٠ِ‫ػ‬-

-In fact, actually, well, as a ‫اهغ‬ٝ ٢‫ك‬/ً‫ؽَ٘ب‬/‫اهغ‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٢‫ك‬/‫وخ‬٤‫ اُؾو‬٢‫ك‬-

matter of fact, the fact of the ‫وخ األٓو‬٤‫ؽو‬/‫األٓو‬
matter

-In any case, anyhow, at any

rate

‫ٌٖ ٖٓ أٓو‬٣ ‫ٔب‬ٜٓ/ٍ‫خ ؽب‬٣‫ أ‬٠ِ‫ػ‬-

-After all, above all
‫ماى‬ٝ ‫نا‬ٛ َ‫هج‬/‫ء‬٢ّ ًَ َ‫هج‬-
-It is true that
... ٕ‫ؼ أ‬٤‫ٕؾ‬-

These conjunctions give the meaning of contrast to what has been said before.
Six of them demand special attendance to: „in fact, as a matter of fact, the fact of
the matter, actually, well, it is true‟ Their equivalents in Arabic can be misleading,
for they are used positively in informal Arabic. However, formally ٢‫ ك‬/‫اهغ األٓو‬ٝ)٢‫(ك‬
)‫وخ‬٤‫ اُؾو‬٢‫ك‬/‫وخ األٓو‬٤‫اهغ؛ ؽو‬ُٞ‫ ا‬and )ٕ‫ؼ أ‬٤‫ (ٕؾ‬are used in a contrastive sense; whereas
)ً‫ (ؽَ٘ب‬can be used in both senses, the positive and the negative.

3. Causal Connectors: Conjunctions of reason: e.g.

1. Reason: (for this reason, because of this, on account of this, for, because, as,
as to, as for, for this purpose, with this in mind, it follows, on this basis,
therefore). ،‫ثبَُ٘جخ ُـ‬/ٖ‫ أٓب ػ‬،ٕ‫ أل‬،)ٕ‫ ثَجت (ثٔب أ‬،ٕ‫ أل‬،‫نا‬ٛ ٠ِ‫ ث٘ب ًء ػ‬،‫نا‬ٛ ‫ ثَجت‬،‫نا اَُجت‬ُٜ(
.)‫ُنُي‬/‫ُنا‬/‫نا‬ُٜ ،ً‫نا األٍب‬ٛ ٠ِ‫ ػ‬، ‫نا‬ٛ ٖ‫٘زظ ػ‬٣ ،ٕ‫نا ثبُؾَجب‬ٛ ً‫ آفنا‬،ٗ‫نا اُـو‬ُٜ ،ٔ‫ق‬٣ ‫ٔب‬٤‫أٓب ك‬

2. Result: (as a result, in consequence, consequently, in this regard, in this

respect, thus, hence, so, etc.). ٢‫ ك‬،‫نا اُٖلك‬ٛ ٢‫ ك‬،٢ُ‫ثبُزب‬ٝ ،‫غخ‬٤‫ ثبُ٘ز‬،)‫ُنُي‬/‫نا‬ُٜ( ‫غخ‬٤‫ً٘ز‬ٝ(
)‫نا‬ُٜ( ‫ ُنا‬،)‫ٌنا‬ٛٝ/‫نا(ُنا‬ُٜ ،)ً‫ٌنا(ئما‬ٛ ،‫نا اُٖلك‬ٛ
 3. Condition: (in that (this) case, in such an event, that being so, under the
circumstances, under other circumstances, etc.) ‫نا‬ٛ َ‫ ٓض‬٢‫ ك‬،‫)اُؾبُخ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ(‫ رِي‬٢‫(ك‬
)‫(ٓقزِلخ‬ٟ‫ف أفو‬ٝ‫ ظو‬٢‫ ك‬،‫٘خ‬ٛ‫ف اُوا‬ٝ‫ ظَ اُظو‬٢‫ ك‬،‫ ثٔب إٔ األٓو ًنُي‬،)‫ اُؾبُخ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ(‫اُظوف‬

4. Temporal connectors: conjunctions of time:

1. Sequence (e.g. first, secondly, next, then, after that, etc.). ‫ ثؼل‬،ً‫ب‬٤ٗ‫ صب‬،ً‫ال‬ٝ‫(أ‬
)‫ ثؼل مُي‬،)‫ثؼلئن‬/‫ ٖٓ صَْ(ثؼل مُي‬،)٢ُ‫مُي(اُزب‬

2. Simultaneity (e.g. at the same time, in the meantime). ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ٢‫ ك‬،َٚ‫هذ ٗل‬ُٞ‫ ا‬٢‫(ك‬
)) ‫ٕ مُي‬ٞٚ‫ ؿ‬٢‫ك‬/‫األص٘بء(أص٘بء مُي‬

3. Precedence: (e.g. previously, formerly, already, beforehand, before that)

)‫ هجَ مُي‬،)‫ َٓجوبً(هجَ مُي‬،ً‫ َٓجوب‬،)ً‫َٓجوب‬/ً‫ اَُبثن(ٍبثوب‬٢‫ ك‬،ً‫(ٍبثوب‬

4. Conclusion (e.g. finally, at last. at the end, in the end, in conclusion, to

conclude, etc.).. )ّ‫ اُقزب‬٢‫ ك‬،ً‫ فزبٓب‬،ّ‫ اُقزب‬٢‫ ك‬،‫خ‬٣‫ب‬ُٜ٘‫ ا‬٢‫ ك‬،ً‫وا‬٤‫ أف‬،ً‫وا‬٤‫(أف‬

5. Immediacy: (e.g. at once, soon, next time(day), an hour later, on another

occasion, until then, at this moment, etc.) ،)ٍ‫ اُؾب‬٢‫ ؽبالً(ك‬،)ٕ٥‫ا‬/ً‫ؽبال‬/‫ه‬ٞ‫ اُل‬٠ِ‫هاً(ػ‬ٞ‫(ك‬
)‫ اُِؾظخ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ٢‫ ك‬،ٖ٤‫ مُي اُؾ‬٠‫ ؽز‬،ٟ‫ كوٕخ أفو‬٢‫ ك‬،)ٕ٥‫ ثؼل ٍبػخ(ٖٓ ا‬،)٢ُ‫ّ اُزب‬ٞ٤ُ‫ ا‬٢‫ أُوح اُوبكٓخ(ك‬٢‫ك‬

6. Present and past (so far, up to now, at this point, here, there, from now on).

)ً‫ٕ كٖبػلا‬٥‫ ٖٓ ا‬،‫٘بى‬ٛ ،‫٘ب‬ٛ ،‫ اُ٘وطخ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ‫ ػ٘ل‬،ٕ٥‫ ا‬٠‫ ؽز‬،ٕ٥‫ ا‬٠‫(ؽز‬

7. Summary: (briefly, in brief, in short, in sum, to sum up, in fine, etc.).

‫ فالٕخ‬،‫ ثبفزٖبه‬،)‫ل‬٤‫ ثبُٔقزٖو(أُل‬،)‫ افزٖبهاً(ثبفزٖبه‬،)‫ ثبُٔقزٖو(ثبفزٖبه‬،‫غبى‬٣‫ ثا‬،‫(ثبفزٖبه‬

)ٜ‫اث‬ٝ‫اُو‬ ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ٖٓ ً ‫ب‬٣‫أ‬ ٕ‫ٍ‘رزوعٔب‬ٞ‫اُو‬ ‫’فالٕخ‬ٝ ‘‫(’ثبفزٖبه‬ )ٍٞ‫اُو‬
 The following points can be made about the translation of sentence connectors
into Arabic:

1. Synonymous translations for the same English connector are usually

interchangeable. That is, „however‟, for instance, can be translated into one of the
following: ) ٕ‫و أ‬٤‫ ؿ‬،‫ٌٖ ٖٓ أٓو‬٣ ‫ٔب‬ٜٓ ،ٍ‫خ ؽب‬٣‫ أ‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬،ٕ‫ل أ‬٤‫ ث‬،ٕ‫ ئال ئ‬،ٌُٖ ْ
ّ ،ٌُٖ( . The same
applies to „though/although‟ which would have the following translations, each of
which is perfectly valid: .).‫ ثوؿْ؛ ئُـ‬،ٖٓ ْ‫ اُوؿ‬٠ِ‫ ػ‬،ٕ‫ ٓغ أ‬،ٕ‫(ثوؿْ أ‬

2. Some Arabic connectors are sometimes misunderstood, or used in the

wrong sense like )‫ (أٓب‬and )ٝ( .The latter is normally used for addition to mean
„and‟, whereas the former means „but‟ and is used for contrast. Sometimes these
contrastive meanings are confused, as "‫ "أٓب‬could be used for addition, „and‟, for
contrast. Consider these examples:

a. “Many people enjoy swimming, but I don‟t”

)‫ أٓب أٗب كال‬،‫و ٖٓ اُ٘بً ثبَُجبؽخ‬٤‫َزٔزغ ًض‬٣(

b. “Many people enjoy swimming, and I enjoy it too”

)ً‫ب‬ٚ٣‫ب أ‬ٜ‫ أٓب أٗب كأٍزٔزغ ث‬،‫و ٖٓ اُ٘بً ثبَُجبؽخ‬٤‫َزٔزغ ًض‬٣(

In the second example, „‫ ‟أٓب‬should be replaced by „ٝ‟ for the relationship here
is of addition, not contrast. It has to be corrected, then, as follows: ٖٓ ‫و‬٤‫َزٔزغ ًض‬٣(
ً‫ب) اُ٘ب‬ٜ‫أٗب ًنُي أٍزٔزغ ث‬ٝ ،‫ ثبَُجبؽخ‬. Moreover, both connectors can be used together in
Arabic only: “Many people enjoy swimming, but I don‟t” ،‫و ٖٓ اُ٘بً ثبَُجبؽخ‬٤‫َزٔزغ ًض‬٣(
)‫أٓب أٗب كال‬ٝ

3. Some connectors are added necessarily or not in Arabic to achieve better

cohesion among sentences, especially when a clearcut connector is not used. They
can be described as initiating particles )‫اٍزئ٘بف‬/ٍ‫ال‬ٜ‫اد اٍز‬ٝ‫(أك‬. Here are some of
them:
ّ ،ٕ‫ئ‬
)...ٝ ‫نا‬ٛ ‫كإ؛‬ ّ ،ٕ‫ش أ‬٤‫ ؽ‬،‫ ئم‬،‫ُول‬،‫(كـ؛ كول‬. e.g.

1. “Dear Sister,

I received your letter of 20th. Ramadan…” :

)...ٕ‫ب‬ٚٓ‫ ه‬20 ٢‫ذ هٍبُزي أُإهفخ ك‬٤‫ كول رِو‬... ‫خ‬٤ُ‫اُـب‬/‫يح‬٣‫ اُؼي‬٢‫(أفز‬

)‫ (كول‬is added as an initiator, may be unnecessarily, just as a stylistic formula

marking the start of a letter.

2.“The doctor diagnosed the disease perfectly. He used a special medical

device for that” )‫بىاً فبٕب ً ُنُي‬ٜ‫ ئم اٍزؼَٔ ع‬.ٔ٤‫و رْق‬٤‫ت أُوٗ ف‬٤‫(ّ َّقٔ اُطج‬

)‫ (ئم‬is a zero connector in English, added as an initiating conjunction to strengthen

sentence connectivity.

3. “Watching T.V. programs is merely a waste of time. Many of these programs

aim at entertaining T.V. watchers, sometimes cheaply. Some T.V. channels try to
improve on the quality of their programs":
 ‫خ‬٤َِ‫ ر‬٠ُ‫ اُجوآظ ئ‬ٙ‫ن‬ٛ ٖٓ ‫و‬٤‫لف اٌُض‬ٜ٣ ‫ ئم‬.‫هذ‬ُِٞ ‫ؼخ‬٤ٚٓ ‫لح ثؼ٘ ثوآظ اُزِلبى ٓغوك‬ٛ‫(ئٕ ْٓب‬
)‫ب‬ٜ‫خ ثوآغ‬٤‫ػ‬ٞٗ ٖ٤َ‫خ رؾ‬٣‫اد اُزِلبى‬ٞ٘‫ٍ ثؼ٘ اُو‬ٝ‫رؾب‬ٝ ‫نا‬ٛ .ً‫بٗب‬٤‫ٔ أؽ‬٤‫ ثٌَْ هف‬،ٖ٣‫ل‬ٛ‫أُْب‬

Here, the three connectors, )ٕ‫(ئ‬, )‫ (ئم‬and )...ٝ ‫نا‬ٛ( are used necessarily in Arabic
to achieve cohesion, as the absence of connectors in English might lead to
ambiguity and unclearness of cohesion.

In sum, sentence connectors are useful conjunctions, used to achieve the best
possible degree of cohesion among sentences and paragraphs in both languages,
English and Arabic, putting together an organic, comprehended text. Failing to use
them properly in translation into Arabic would result in misunderstanding the
original meaning properly. Therefore, translators and students of translation are
required to take care of them as accurately as possible.
CONCLUSIONS:

The grammatical problems of English-Arabic translation are numerous. They

arise from differences between the two languages in grammatical aspects like
tenses, word order, questions, negation, personal pronouns, adjectives, classes of
words (verbs, nouns, adjectives, etc.) articles, sentence connectors, etc.

The account of grammatical problems given in this chapter is not final. Other
problems like the translation of adverbs and prepositions are not included.
Prepositions are partly discussed in chapter two (see the translation of collocations)
whereas adverbs are included in the examples used throughout this book. Further,
there are three grammatical forms in Arabic which can be used to translate English
adverbs, except adverbs of time, place and frequency:

1. One-word prepositional phrase(a preposition+noun)e.g. „quickly‟: )‫(ثَوػخ‬

2. One-word(i.e.ٌَْ‫)ث‬or two-word(i.e.ٞ‫ ٗؾ‬٠ِ‫)ػ‬prepositional phrase+an adjective :

(e.g. „quickly‟: )‫غ‬٣‫ ٍو‬ٞ‫ ٗؾ‬٠ِ‫ػ‬/‫غ‬٣‫(ثٌَْ ٍو‬

3. A circumstantial word (ٍ‫)ؽب‬: e.g. „quickly‟ )ً‫ؼب‬٣‫)ٍو‬

English adverbs of time, place and frequency have their equivalents in Arabic:
e.g.

“When, while, before, after, etc.”: ).‫ ئُـ‬،‫ ثؼل‬،َ‫ هج‬،ٖ٤‫ ؽ‬٢‫ك‬/،‫٘ٔب‬٤‫ ث‬،‫(ػ٘لٓب‬

“Here, there, over, under , etc.”: ).‫ ئُـ‬،‫ رؾذ‬، ‫م‬ٞ‫ ك‬،‫٘بى‬ٛ ،‫٘ب‬ٛ(

“Always, usually, often, sometimes, occasionally, etc.”:

).‫ ئُـ‬،ً‫ب‬٤ٙ‫ ػو‬،ً‫ ٗبكها‬،ً‫بٗب‬٤‫ أؽ‬،ً‫ ؿبُجب‬،‫ ػبكح‬،ً‫(كائٔب‬

 Another minor grammatical problem is the translation of direct and indirect
objects. There is no problem when the direct object is first, followed by the indirect
object :e. g.

(1) (2)

1.”He gave a present to his daughter”: ‫خ‬٣‫ل‬ٛ ٠‫(أػط‬

)ٚ‫الث٘ز‬

(1) (2)

2. “He bought a car to his daughter”: ‫بهح‬٤ٍ ٟ‫(اّزو‬

)ٚ‫الث٘ز‬

However, the problem arises when the indirect object precedes the direct
object:

(2) (1)

1. “ He gave his daughter a present”: )‫خ‬٣‫ل‬ٛ ٚ‫ اث٘ز‬٠‫(أػط‬

(2) (1)

2. “He bought his daughter a car”: )‫بهح‬٤ٍ ٚ‫ اث٘ز‬ٟ‫(اّزو‬

Although the first is not problematic, as (٠‫ )أػط‬takes two objects in Arabic as
well, the second can cause confusion to some students, for (ٟ‫ )اّزو‬takes only one
object in Arabic. Therefore, it would be misunderstood as:

“He bought his daughter!” (! ٚ‫ اث٘ز‬ٟ‫ )اّزو‬and nobody can buy or sell his daughter!
Solution:

The indirect object in English should be translated with its deleted preposition
into Arabic as follows: (‫بهح‬٤ٍ ٚ‫ الث٘ز‬ٟ‫)اّزو‬.

Thus, confusion is disposed of, and the Arabic version is made grammatical,
as (ٟ‫ )اّزو‬does not accept two objects.

All grammatical problems of translation discussed earlier in this chapter are

followed by their possible solutions, so that the process of translation can proceed
fluently and properly, and the search for meaning may, therefore, continue in the
right direction, giving way for the far more important and difficult lexical problems
of translation to be discussed in detail, located and, then, solved.
EXERCISES:

1. Translate these statements into nominal structures )‫فجو‬ٝ ‫ (ٓجزلأ‬in Arabic:

1. This is an important factor of the writer-reader relationship

2. What‟s up?

3. We need your help.

4. This is no man‟s land.

5. The picture is by no means clear.

2. Translate the following statements into verbal structures )َ‫كبػ‬ٝ َ‫ (كؼ‬in Arabic:

1. Everybody is required to do his/her job well.

2. Won‟t you tell me the whole truth?

3. I don‟t understand what you mean.

4. Writing his homeworks properly, he passed the exam easily.

5. Get well soon.

3. Translate each of these statements into Arabic: First into nominal structures;
second,

into verbal structures:

1. How old are you, boy?

2. Ahmad may be bed-ridden

 3. Here is my home address

4. Be careful with your superiors!

5. He wants to confess something

4. Translate the following sentences into Arabic with emphasis on the doer of
action:

1. Allah the Almighty forgives the sins of the penitent

2. You say that! I can‟t believe it.

3. Housewives spend a long time in the kitchen

4. We did nothing to receive punishement

5. Parents do their best for the prosperity of their childern

5. Change the word class of the underlined words in the Arabic translations of the

following (e.g. an adjective into a noun; a noun into a verb; a verb into a noun,
etc.):

1. Watercolour paints are different from oil paints.

2. This problem is insuperable:

3. Bill feels ill:

4. Blood oranges and navel oranges are quality oranges

5. Be quiet please! Calm down!

6. Translate the following sentences into Arabic with a normal Arabic word order:
 1.Such attitude cannot be acceptable.

2. That book is useful to read.

3. Today is neither cold nor warm. It is a moderate day.

4. In the forthcoming chapters, more points on translation are to come.

5. That poor lady did no harm to anybody.

7. Translate the following passive sentences into passive equivalents in Arabic:

1. Distinguished students have been honored at the end of this academic year.

2. The innocent man was beaten to death.

3. Our new house will be furnished soon, God willing.

4. Nobody is allowed in after 12 O‟clock when the lecture starts.

5. The patient will be rewarded whereas the impatient will be punished in the
Hereafter.

ّ sentences in Arabic. Remember that this

8. Translate these sentences into )ٕ‫(ئ‬

type of Arabic sentence is usually emphatic:

1. The Zionists are the enemies of Allah and Muslims.

2. All children‟s stories have happy endings.

3. The woman who forced the girl to get married early was her step mother.

4. Really good books are available in bookshops, but quite expensive.

 5. Many T.V. channels are useless and frustrating, neither more nor less.

9. Translate the following sentences into verses from the Holy Quran:

1. There is no God but Allah.

2. And man was created weak.

3. The month of Ramadan was the one in which the Koran was revealed.

4. Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds.

5. …And do not backbite one another.

10. Provide the missing connectors at the beginning of sentences in the following

passage, and then translate it into Arabic:

“Makkah Al-Mukarramah is a holy city for Muslims all over the world. ………..
non-Muslims are not allowed to enter it. ………. Ka'ba, the Venerable House of
Allah, is the center of earth. ………., it is the direction of prayer for Muslims
anywhere in the world. ………., it is the House that gathers all Muslims together at
least five times a day toward the same direction.”
 GLOSSARY
Abnormality ‫شذوذ‬
Absolute synonym ‫مرادف مطلق‬/‫مطلق‬/‫رديف‬
Abstract words ‫كلمات رلردة‬
Acronym ‫سلتصر‬
Active style ‫أسلوب ادلبين للمعلوم‬
Adapted metaphors ‫استعارات مقتبسة‬
Additive connectors/conjunctions ‫روابط اإلضافة‬
Adjectival noun ‫اسم مستعمل كنعت‬/‫اسم نعيت‬
Adjectives ‫نعوت‬/‫صفات‬
Adverbs ‫ظروف‬
Adverbs of contrast ‫ظروف مغايرة‬
Adverbs of frequency ‫ظروف الورود ادلتكرر‬/‫ظروف التكرار‬
Adverbs of place ‫ظروف ادلكان‬
Adverbs of time ‫ظروف الزمان‬
Advertising ‫إعالن‬
Adversative connectors/conjunctions ‫روابط ادلغايرة‬
Aggressive ‫هتجمي‬
Agricultural ‫زراعي‬
Alliteration ‫سجع‬
Alternative ‫بديل‬
Ambiguous style ‫أسلوب غامض‬
Ambiguity ‫غموض‬
Anatomy ‫تشريح‬
Antonymy ‫تضاد‬/‫طباق‬
Applicablility ‫تطبيقية‬/‫إمكانية التطبيق‬
Arab League Educational , Cultural and Scientific Organization(ALECSO)
)‫ادلنظمة العربية للرتبية والثقافة والعلوم (األلكسو‬
Arabic culture ‫الثقافة العربية‬
Arabization/Arabicization ‫تعريب‬
Arabize ‫يعرب‬
ِّ
Arabized ‫معرب‬
َّ
Arabized Technical terms ‫مصطلحات فنية معَّربة‬
Arabized terms ‫مصطلحات معربة‬
Arabzid words ‫كلمات معربة‬
Articles ‫أدوات‬
‫‪Assonance‬‬ ‫سجع األصوات(الصوائت)‬
‫‪At sentence level‬‬ ‫على مستوى(صعيد)اجلملة‬
‫‪At text level‬‬ ‫على مستوى(صعيد)النص‬
‫‪Attached pronoun‬‬ ‫ضمًن متصل‬
‫‪Auxiliaries‬‬ ‫أفعال مساعدة(يف اإلجنليزية)‬
‫‪Auxiliary verb‬‬ ‫فعل مساعد(يف اإلجن ليزية)‬
‫‪Back naturalization‬‬ ‫تطبيع عكسي‬
‫‪Back-translation test‬‬ ‫اختبار الرتمجة العكسية‬
‫‪Back translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة عكسية‪/‬ترمجة رجعية‬
‫‪Bad style‬‬ ‫أسلوب رديء‬
‫‪Balance‬‬ ‫توازن‬
‫‪Bear responsibility‬‬ ‫يتحمل مسؤولية‬
‫‪Beat‬‬ ‫شطر التفعيلة ادلشدد‬
‫‪Bilingual dictionary‬‬ ‫قاموس ثنائي اللغة‬
‫‪Biological‬‬ ‫حيوي‬
‫‪Borderline‬‬ ‫حد فاصل‬
‫‪Bound free translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة حرة مقيدة‬
‫‪Brace brackets‬‬ ‫أقواس متعرجة‬
‫‪Brackets‬‬ ‫أقواس‬
‫‪Causal connectors/conjunctions‬‬ ‫روابط السببية‬
‫‪Cause and effect‬‬ ‫السبب والنتيجة‬
‫‪Central meaning‬‬ ‫معىن مركزي‪/‬معىن رئيسي‬
‫‪Change of word class‬‬ ‫تغيًن صنف الكلمة(من اسم إىل صفة إخل‪).‬‬
‫‪Chemical terms‬‬ ‫مصطلحات كيمياء‪/‬كيميائية‬
‫‪Chiming‬‬ ‫تآلف‪/‬تقارب الصوت وادلعىن‬
‫‪Circumstantial word‬‬ ‫حال‬
‫‪Clarity‬‬ ‫وضوح‬
‫‪Classical Arabic‬‬ ‫اللغة العربية التقليدية‪/‬العريقة‬
‫‪Classifier‬‬ ‫مصنِّف‬
‫‪Clause by clause‬‬ ‫عبارةً فعليةً عبارةً فعليةً‪/‬عبارةً بعد أخرى‬
‫‪Clause order‬‬ ‫ترتيب العبارات الفعلية‬
‫‪Clauses‬‬ ‫عبارات فعلية‬
‫‪Closed system irony‬‬ ‫سخرية احليص بيص‬
‫‪Cliché metaphors‬‬ ‫استعارات مبتذلة‬
‫‪Close synonym‬‬ ‫رديف(مرادف)لصيق‬
‫‪Close translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة لصيقة‬
Cohesive devices ‫أدوات رابطة‬
Coinage ‫سك‬/‫نقش‬
Coined ‫مسكوك‬/‫منقوش‬
Collocability ‫إمكانية التالزم‬/‫تالزمية‬
Collocate ‫يتالزم‬/‫يالزم‬
Collocations ‫متالزمات لفظية‬
Colloquial ‫عامي‬
Colloquial Arabic ‫اللغة العربية العامية‬
Common meaning ‫معىن شائع‬/‫معىن عام‬
Common phrasal verbs ‫أفعال مركبة شائعة‬
Communicative translation )‫ترمجة ختاطبية(حرة‬
Compactness ‫تضام‬/‫إحكام‬
Complex irony ‫سخرية مبطنة‬/‫أسلوب هتكم معقد‬
Complex style ‫أسلوب معقد‬
Complexity ‫تعقيد‬
Complicated network ‫شبكة معقدة‬
Complicated SL grammar ‫قواعد اللغة األصل ادلعقدة‬
Componential analysis ‫حتليل ادلكونات‬
Components of metaphor ‫مكونات االستعارة‬/‫عناصر‬
Comprehensiveness ‫مشولية‬
Computer terms ‫مصطلحات احلاسوب‬
Conjunction ‫أداة ربط‬/‫رابطة‬
Connector ‫أداة ربط‬/‫رابطة‬
Connotations ‫مضامٌن‬
Consonance ‫سجع الصوامت‬
Construction ‫تركيب‬
Contempt ‫احتقار‬
Contractions ‫إدغامات‬/)‫اختصارات(قواعدية‬
Context of words ‫سياق الكلمات‬
Contrastive connectors ‫روابط ادلغايرة‬
Contrastive irony ‫مسرحي‬/‫هتكم درامي‬
Contrastive styles ‫أساليب مغايرة‬
Conversion )ً‫قلب قواعدي(بتقدمي الفعل على الفاعل يف اإلجنليزية مثال‬
Co-ordination Bureau of Arabization (CBA) ‫مكتب تنسيق التعريب‬
Core combination ‫ائتالف جوهري‬
Core meaning ‫معىن أساسي‬/‫معىن جوهري‬
Creative translation ‫ترمجة خالقة‬
Criteria ‫أسس‬/‫معايًن‬/‫فياصل‬
Crystallized meaning ‫معىن ُمبلور‬
Countable nouns ‫أمساء معدودة‬
Counter-balance )‫مضاد‬/‫توازن مقابل(مواز‬
Cultural ‫ثقايف‬
Cultural ambiguity ‫غموض ثقايف‬
Cultural correspondence ‫تطابق ثقايف‬
Cultural differences ‫اختالفات ثقافية‬
Cultural equivalent ‫مكافئ ثقايف‬/‫مرادف‬

Cultural meaning ‫معىن ثقايف‬

Cultural metaphors ‫استعارات ثقافية‬
Cultural problem ‫مشكلة ثقافية‬
Cultural terms ‫مصطلحات ثق افية‬
Cultural titles ‫عناوين ثقافية‬
Culture ‫ثقافة‬
Culture-specific ‫خاص بثقافة ما‬
Dangerous translation ‫ترمجة خطرة‬
Dash )‫شرطة(اعرتاضية‬/‫قاطعة‬
Dead metaphors ‫استعارات ميتة‬
Definite article ‫الـ التعريف‬/‫أداة تعريف‬
Degrees of expressivity ‫درجات التعبًنية‬
Degrees of popularity ‫درجات الشعبية‬
Derivation ‫اشتقاق‬
Derived Arabized terms ‫مصطلحات معربة مشتقة‬
Despirited text ‫نص ال روح فيه‬/‫نص جامد‬
Dictionary meaning ‫معىن حبيس ادلعجم غًن شائع يف االستعمال‬/‫معىن معجمي‬
Different styles ‫أساليب متباينة‬
Dimensions of meaning ‫أبعاد ادلعىن‬
Diminutive names ‫أمساء مصغرة‬/‫أمساء تصغًن‬
Direct idioms )‫تعابًن اصطالحية مباشرة(يف الرتمجة‬
Direct language ‫لغة عادية‬/‫لغة مباشرة‬
Direct meaning ‫معىن مباشر‬
Direct translation ‫ترمجة مباشرة‬
Directness ‫مباشرية‬
Disguised irony )‫سخرية خفية(الذعة‬/‫هتكم مقنع‬
Dramatic irony ‫هتكم درامي‬
Duality ‫ازدواجية‬
Dynamic translation ‫متغًنة‬/‫ترمجة متحركة‬
Effect(s) ‫تأثًن‬/‫أثر‬
Embarrassment ‫إرباك‬/‫إحراج‬
Emphasis ‫توكيد‬/‫تأكيد‬
Emphatic redundancy ‫حشو توكيدي‬
Engendering ‫توليد‬
English culture ‫ثقافة إجنليزية‬
Equative verb ‫معادل بٌن كلمتٌن‬/‫فعل مكافئ‬
Equivalent ‫مرادف‬/‫مكافئ‬
Equivalent style ‫أسلوب مرادف‬
Established naturalization ‫تطبيع معتمد‬
Established transcription ‫رسم لفظي معتمد‬
Established translation ‫ترمجة معتمدة‬
Exclamation mark ‫إشارة التعجب‬
Expressive ‫معرب‬/‫تعبًني‬
Expressive texts ‫نصوص معربة‬/‫نصوص تعبًنية‬
Expressive word ‫مليئة بادلعاين ادلعربة‬/‫معربة‬/‫كلمة تعبًنية‬
Expressivity ‫تعبًنية‬
Expressivity, context and readership ‫التعبًنية والسياق والقراء‬
Faithfulness ‫أمانة‬/‫صدق‬
Familiar alternatives ‫بدائل مألوفة‬
Familiarity ‫ألفة‬
Figurative language ‫لغة رلازية‬
Fixed collocations )‫اصطالحية‬/‫متالزمات لفظية ثابتة(غًن قابلة للتغيًن‬
Fixed expression ‫اصطالحي‬/‫تعبًن ثابت‬
Fixed phrase ‫اصطالحية‬/‫عبارة ثابتة‬
Fixed metaphor ‫اصطالحية‬/‫استعارة ثابتة‬
Fixed saying ‫اصطالحي‬/‫قول ثابت‬
Fixed structure ‫اصطالحية‬/‫بنية ثابتة‬
Fixedness ‫اصطالحية‬/‫ثبات‬
Flexibility ‫مرونة‬
Foot ‫تفعيلة‬
Foreign culture ‫ثقافة أجنبية‬
Foreign nature ‫طبيعة أجنبية‬
Foreign technical term ‫مصطلح فين أجنيب‬
Foreign term(s) ‫مصطلحات أجنبية‬
Formal ‫فصيح‬
Formal Arabic ‫عربية فصحى‬
Formal language ‫لغة فصحى‬
Formal metaphor ‫استعارة فصحى‬
Formal titles ‫ألقاب رمسية‬
Formal vs. dynamic translation ‫الرتمجة الثابتة مقابل الرتمجة ادلتحركة‬
Formal vs. informal language ‫لغة فصحى مقابل لغة غًن فصحى‬
Formality ‫فصاحة‬
Formality scale ‫سلم الفصاحة‬
Free translation ‫ترمجة حرة‬
Frequency ‫تكرارية‬/‫ورود متكرر‬
Front position )‫موقع متصدر(يف أول اجلملة‬
Fronted clause ‫عبارة فعلية متصدرة‬
Fronted words )‫كلمات متصدرة(للجملة‬
Fronting ‫تصدير‬/‫تقدمي‬
Frozen formal ‫القحة‬/ً‫(اللغة)الفصحى جدا‬
Full meaning ‫معىن كامل‬
Full stop ‫نقطة‬
Full translation of meaning ‫الرتمجة الكاملة للمعىن‬
Function ‫وظيفة‬
Functional view of style ‫رؤية وظيفية لألسلوب‬
Generalization ‫تعميم‬/‫عمومية‬
General words ‫كلمات عامة‬
Genitive(case) ‫ادلضاف وادلضاف إليه‬/‫حالة اإلضافة‬
Geographical terms ‫مصطلحات جغرافية‬
Good reason ‫سبب وجيه‬
Grading scale ‫سلم تدرجي‬
Grammatical complexity(complication) ‫تعقيد قواعدي‬
Grammatical construction ‫تركيب قواعدي‬
Grammatical function ‫وظيفة قواعدية‬
Grammatical problems ‫مشاكل قواعدية‬
Grammatical structure ‫بنية قواعدية‬
Grammatical stylistic problems ‫مشاكل أسلوبية قواعدية‬
‫‪Grammatical words‬‬ ‫كلمات قواعدية‬
‫‪Greater context‬‬ ‫السياق األكرب‪/‬سياق النص كله‬
‫‪Grouping‬‬ ‫جتميع‪/‬تركيب‪/‬ضم‬
‫‪Honest willingness to Arabize‬‬ ‫إرادة صادقة للتعريب‬
‫‪Honesty‬‬ ‫صدق‪/‬أمانة‬
‫‪Identical grammatical structure‬‬ ‫بنية قواعدية مطابقة‬
‫‪Identical style‬‬ ‫أسلوب مطابق‬
‫‪Idiom‬‬ ‫تعبًن اصطالحي‬
‫‪Idiomatic meaning‬‬ ‫معىن اصطالحي‪/‬معىن رلازي‬
‫)‪Image(of a metaphor‬‬ ‫ادلشبه(يف االستعارة)‬
‫‪Impact‬‬ ‫تأثًن‬
‫‪Implication‬‬ ‫مضمون‪/‬تضمٌن‬
‫‪Implied meaning‬‬ ‫معىن ضمين‬
‫‪Impolite style‬‬ ‫أسلوب فظ‬
‫‪Importance of style‬‬ ‫أمهية األسلوب‬
‫‪Inaccurate translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة غًن دقيقة‪/‬خاطئة‬
‫‪Indefinite article‬‬ ‫أداة تنكًن‪/‬نكرة(يف اإلجنليزية)‬
‫‪Indirect idioms‬‬ ‫تعابًن اصطالحية غًن مباشرة(يف الرتمجة)‬
‫‪Indirect meaning‬‬ ‫معىن غًن مباشر‪/‬معىن رلازي‬
‫‪Indirect translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة غًن مباشرة‪/‬ترمجة رلازية‬
‫‪Innuendo irony‬‬ ‫سخرية دلاحة‪ /‬هتكم ادلدح ادلذموم‬
‫‪Inescapable‬‬ ‫ال مفر منه‪/‬ال منجى منه‬
‫‪Inflexible‬‬ ‫ثابت‪/‬غًن قابل للمرونة‬
‫‪Informal‬‬ ‫غًن فصيح‪/‬شبه فصيح‪/‬عامي‬
‫‪Informal Arabic‬‬ ‫عربية غًن فصحى‪/‬عربية عامية‬
‫‪Informal expressions‬‬ ‫تعابًن غًن فصحى‬
‫‪Informal language‬‬ ‫لغة غًن فصحى‬
‫‪Informal sayings‬‬ ‫أقوال غًن فصحى‬
‫‪Informality‬‬ ‫ال فصاحة‪/‬شبه فصاحة‪/‬عامية‬
‫‪Insertions‬‬ ‫إقحامات‪/‬إدخاالت‪/‬اعرتاضات(للجملة)‬
‫‪Interchangeable‬‬ ‫متداخل‪/‬قابل للتبادل‪/‬متقاطع‬
‫‪Interpretation‬‬ ‫تأويل‪/‬تفسًن‬
‫‪Interrogative‬‬ ‫االستفهام‪/‬استفهامي‬
‫‪Intimate style‬‬ ‫أسلوب محيم‬
‫‪Invasion of foreign technology‬‬ ‫غزو التقنية(التقانة)األجنبية‬
‫‪Irony‬‬ ‫هتكم‪/‬سخرية‬
‫‪Language Academies‬‬ ‫اجملامع اللغوية‪/‬رلامع اللغة العربية‬
‫‪Language components‬‬ ‫مكونات‪/‬عناصر اللغة‬
‫‪Language stock‬‬ ‫سلزون اللغة‪/‬ادلخزون اللغوي‬
‫‪The last resort‬‬ ‫ادلالذ األخًن‪/‬أضعف اإلميان‬
‫‪Legal language‬‬ ‫لغة قانونية‬
‫‪Levels of meaning‬‬ ‫مستويات ادلعىن‪/‬طبقات ادلعىن‬
‫‪Lexical ambiguity‬‬ ‫غموض لفظي‬
‫‪Lexical family‬‬ ‫عائلة لفظية‬
‫‪Lexical items‬‬ ‫ألفاظ‬
‫‪Lexical problems‬‬ ‫مشاكل معجمية‪/‬مشاكل لفظية‬
‫‪Lexical set‬‬ ‫رلموعة لفظية‪/‬رلموعة مرتادفات‬
‫‪Lexical words‬‬ ‫كلمات معجمية‬
‫‪Line of camels‬‬ ‫صف‪/‬رتل من اجلمال‬
‫‪Linguistic context‬‬ ‫سياق لغوي‬
‫‪The lion‟s share‬‬ ‫حصة األسد‬
‫‪Literal vs. free translation‬‬ ‫الرتمجة احلرفية مقابل الرتمجة احلرة‬
‫‪Literal meaning‬‬ ‫معىن حريف‪/‬دقيق‪/‬شائع‪/‬سياقي‪/‬غًن رلازي‬
‫‪Literal translation‬‬ ‫الرتمجة احلرفية‬
‫‪Literal translation of meaning‬‬ ‫الرتمجة احلرفية(الدقيقة)للمعىن‬
‫‪Literal understanding‬‬ ‫فهم حريف‬
‫‪Literary collocation‬‬ ‫متالزم أديب‬
‫‪Literature‬‬ ‫أدب‬
‫‪Logical acceptability‬‬ ‫تقبل منطقي‬
‫‪Long sentencing‬‬ ‫أسلوب(استعمال)اجلمل الطويلة‬
‫‪Loose free translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة حرة طليقة(من القيود)‬
‫‪Machine terms‬‬ ‫مصطلحات(أمساء)اآللة‬
‫‪Main verb‬‬ ‫فعل رئيسي‬
‫‪Major linguistic context‬‬ ‫سياق لغوي كبًن(عام‪/‬شامل)‬
‫‪Meaningful‬‬ ‫ذو مغزى‪/‬ذو معىن‬
‫‪Measurement‬‬ ‫قياس‬
‫‪Measures‬‬ ‫مقاييس(لغوية)‬
‫‪Medical terms‬‬ ‫مصطلحات طبية‬
‫‪Message‬‬ ‫فحوى‪/‬رسالة‬
‫‪Metaphor‬‬ ‫استعارة‬
‫‪Metaphorical‬‬ ‫استعاري‪/‬رلازي‬
‫‪Metaphorical meaning‬‬ ‫معىن استعاري‪/‬رلازي‬
‫‪Metaphorical use‬‬ ‫استعمال رلازي‬
‫‪Metaphor-word‬‬ ‫الكلمة االستعارة(كأحد مكونات االستعارة)‬
‫‪Methods of Arabization‬‬ ‫طرق التعريب‬
‫‪Methods of translation‬‬ ‫طرق الرتمجة‬
‫‪Metonymy‬‬ ‫كناية‬
‫)‪Metre(meter‬‬ ‫حبر(يف الشعر)‬
‫‪Ministry terms‬‬ ‫مصطلحات الوزارات‬
‫‪Minor linguistic context‬‬ ‫سياق لغوي صغًن(زلدود)‬
‫‪Mistranslation‬‬ ‫سوء ترمجة‪/‬ترمجة خاطئة‬
‫‪Misinterpretation‬‬ ‫سوء تأويل‪/‬تفسًن خاطئ‬
‫‪Modal verbs‬‬ ‫أفعال مساعدة(يف اإلجنليزية)‬
‫‪Modals‬‬ ‫(را ادلادة السابقة)‬
‫)‪Modern Standard Arabic(MSA‬‬ ‫اللغة العربية الفصحى احلديثة(ادلعاصرة)‬
‫‪Modification‬‬ ‫وصف(قواعدي)‬
‫‪Monolingual dictionary‬‬ ‫قاموس أحادي اللغة‬
‫‪Monosemic word‬‬ ‫كلمة وحيدة ادلعىن‬
‫‪Monosemy‬‬ ‫أحادية ادلعىن‬
‫‪Muslim culture‬‬ ‫الثقافة اإلسالمية‪/‬ثقافة ادلسلمٌن‬
‫‪MSA‬‬ ‫(را ‪(Modern Standard Arabic‬‬
‫‪Naturalization‬‬ ‫تطبيع(كلمات أجنبية‬
‫‪Naturalize‬‬ ‫يُطبِّع‬
‫‪Naturalized word‬‬ ‫كلمة مطبَّعة‬
‫‪Near synonymy‬‬ ‫ترادف قريب‪/‬تقرييب‬
‫‪Neologism‬‬ ‫مستجدة‪/‬كلمة جديدة‬
‫‪Newly Arabized terms‬‬ ‫معربة حديثاً‬
‫كلمات َّ‬
‫‪Nominal vs. verbal sentences‬‬ ‫مجل امسية مقابل مجل فعلية‬
‫‪Nominalization‬‬ ‫امسية‪/‬استعمال األمساء من دون األفعال‬
‫‪Non-creative vs. creative translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة خالقة (إبداعية)مقابل ترمجة غًن خالقة(غًن إبداعية)‬
‫‪Non-frequency‬‬ ‫عدم توارد‪/‬عدم ورود متكرر‬
‫‪Non-literal translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة غًن حرفية‬
‫‪Non-metaphorical use‬‬ ‫استعمال غًن رلازي‬
‫‪Non-Muslim culture‬‬ ‫ثقافة غًن إسالمية‬
‫‪Non-pragmatic vs. pragmatic translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة غًن مقصدية مقابل ترمجة مقصدية‬
‫‪Non-standard measures‬‬ ‫مقاييس غًن معيارية‬
‫‪Non-technical terms‬‬ ‫مصطلحات غًن فنية‪/‬غًن ختصصية‪/‬شعبية‬
‫‪Normal word order‬‬ ‫ترتيب كالم اعتيادي(مألوف)‬
‫‪Normality‬‬ ‫اعتيادية‪/‬ألفة‬
‫‪Noun substitution‬‬ ‫استبدال االسم‬
‫‪Objectivity‬‬ ‫موضوعية‪/‬حيادية‬
‫‪Obligation‬‬ ‫إلزام‪/‬قسر‪/‬فرض‪/‬فريضة‬
‫‪Off-beat‬‬ ‫شطر التفعيلة ادلخفف‬
‫‪Official style‬‬ ‫أسلوب رمسي(منمق)‬
‫‪One-to-one literal translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة حرفية واحد بواحد‬
‫‪Onomatopoeia‬‬ ‫زلاكاة الصوت للمعىن‬
‫‪Original metaphor‬‬ ‫استعارة أصيلة‬
‫‪Over-exaggeration‬‬ ‫إغراق‪/‬مغاالة‪/‬إفراط يف ادلبالغة‬
‫‪Paragraph by paragraph‬‬ ‫فقرة فقرًة‪/‬فقرًة بعد أخرى‬
‫‪Parallel‬‬ ‫مواز‬
‫‪Parallelism‬‬ ‫تواز‬
‫‪Paraphrase‬‬ ‫شرح (مقتضب)‬
‫‪Parentheses‬‬ ‫أقواس هاللية(اعرتاضية)‬
‫‪Parliamental terms‬‬ ‫مصطلحات بردلانية‬
‫‪Particle‬‬ ‫أداة‬
‫‪Passive‬‬ ‫اجملهول‪/‬ادلبين للمجهول‬
‫‪Passive vs. active style‬‬ ‫أسلوب ادلبين للمجهول مقابل أسلوب ادلبين للمعلوم‬
‫‪Patches‬‬ ‫رقع‬
‫‪Pedantic skill‬‬ ‫مهارة متشدقة‪/‬مهارة مفتعلة‬
‫‪Pedants‬‬ ‫ادلتشدقون‪/‬ادلتحذلقون‬
‫‪Period‬‬ ‫نقطة‬
‫‪Phonological problems‬‬ ‫مشاكل صوتية‬
‫‪Phonology‬‬ ‫دراسة األصوات‬
‫‪Phrasal verbs‬‬ ‫أفعال مركبة‬
‫‪Phrase‬‬ ‫عبارة‬
‫‪Phrase by phrase‬‬ ‫عبارةً عبارةً‪/‬عبارةً بعد أخرى‬
‫‪Pitch‬‬ ‫طبقة الصوت‬
‫‪Poetry‬‬ ‫شعر‬
‫‪Political establishments‬‬ ‫مؤسسات سياسية‬
‫‪Polysemic word‬‬ ‫كلمة متعددة ادلعاين‬
‫‪Polysemy‬‬ ‫ادلشرتك اللفظي‪/‬تعدد ادلعىن‬
‫‪Polysemous‬‬ ‫تعددي‪/‬متعدد(ادلعىن)‬
‫‪Pompous translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة طنانة رنانة‬
‫‪Poor text‬‬ ‫نص فقًن‪/‬نص رديء(األسلوب)‬
‫‪Poor translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة فقًنة‪/‬ترمجة رديئة‬
‫‪Popular synonyms‬‬ ‫مرتادفات شعبية‬
‫‪Practical approach‬‬ ‫منهج عملي‬
‫‪Pragmatic translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة مقصدية‪/‬ترمجة النوايا‬
‫‪Precede and proceed‬‬ ‫يسبق ويلحق‬
‫‪Precision of translation‬‬ ‫دقة الرتمجة‬
‫‪Prepositional phrase‬‬ ‫اجلار واجملرور‬
‫‪Prepositional verbs‬‬ ‫أفعال جرية‪/‬أفعال متبوعة حبرف جر‬
‫‪Problem by problem‬‬ ‫مشكلةً مشكلةً‪/‬مشكلةً بعد أخرى‬
‫‪Presupposed theory‬‬ ‫نظرية مسلم هبا‪/‬مفرتضة مسبقاً‬
‫‪Process of translating‬‬ ‫عملية القيام بالرتمجة‪/‬عملية سًن الرتمجة‬
‫‪Prosody‬‬ ‫عروض‬
‫‪Proverbs‬‬ ‫أمثال‪/‬حكم‬
‫‪Provocative tone‬‬ ‫نغمة حتريضية‪/‬أسلوب استفزازي‬
‫‪Pun‬‬ ‫تورية‬
‫)‪Punctuation(marks‬‬ ‫عالمات الرتقيم(الرتقٌن)‬
‫‪Purist‬‬ ‫صفوي‪/‬متزمت‬
‫‪Purism‬‬ ‫صفوية‪/‬تزمت‬
‫‪Questions‬‬ ‫أسئلة‬
‫‪Question mark‬‬ ‫إشارة استفهام‬
‫‪Quotation marks‬‬ ‫عالمات اقتباس‪/‬مزدوجان‬
‫‪Reactionary irony‬‬ ‫هتكم انفعايل‪/‬سخرية ردة الفعل‬
‫‪Readership‬‬ ‫قُـراء‪/‬مجهور القراء‬
‫‪Real meaning‬‬ ‫معىن حقيقي‪/‬معىن فعلي‬
‫‪Recent metaphor‬‬ ‫استعارة حديثة‬
‫‪Recognized translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة معرتف هبا‪/‬ترمجة معتمدة‬
‫‪Recurrence/recurrency‬‬ ‫رواج‪/‬ورود متكرر‪/‬توارد‬
‫‪Redundancy‬‬ ‫حشو‪/‬إطناب‬
‫‪Redundant‬‬ ‫إطنايب‬
‫)‪Relevance(to meaning‬‬ ‫صلة وثيقة(بادلعىن)‬
‫‪Religious phrase‬‬ ‫عبارة دينية‬
‫‪Religious titles‬‬ ‫ألقاب دينية‬
‫‪Render‬‬ ‫ينقل(معىن يف الرتمجة)‬
‫‪Rendition‬‬ ‫نقل(نص يف الرتمجة)‬
‫‪Repetition‬‬ ‫تكرار‬
‫‪Repetition and variation‬‬ ‫التكرار والتنويع‬
Retention of redundancy ‫اإلبقاء على احلشو‬
Retranslate ‫يرتجم ثانية‬/‫يرتجم من جديد‬/‫يعيد الرتمجة‬
Revival ‫إحياء‬
Revived Arabized terms ‫مصطلحات معربة زليية‬
Rhyme ‫قافية‬
Rhythm ‫إيقاع‬
Right translation ‫ترمجة صحيحة‬
Root verb ‫اجلذر‬/‫الفعل اجلذر‬
Satisfactory translation ‫ترمجة مرضية‬
Scansion/scanning ‫تقطيع شعري‬
Scientific discoveries ‫اكتشافات علمية‬
Scientific terms ‫مصطلحات علمية‬
Self-correction )‫تصحيح الذات(ذايت‬
Semantic ‫داليل‬/‫معنوي‬
Semantic vs. communicative translation ‫الرتمجة ادلعنوية مقابل الرتمجة التخاطبية‬
Semi-collocation ‫شبه متالزم لفظي‬
Semi-colon ‫فاصلة منقوطة‬
Semitic language ‫لغة سامية‬
Sensible translation )‫ترمجة معقولة(مقبولة‬
Sensitive ‫حساس‬
Sensitivity ‫حساسية‬
Sentence by sentence ‫مجلةً بعد أخرى‬/ً‫مجلةً مجلة‬
Sentence connectors ‫روابط(أدوات ربط) اجلمل‬
Serious mistake ‫خطأ جسيم‬
Shade of ambiguity ‫أثر غموض‬/‫غموض طفيف‬
Sharp tone ‫نغمة حادة‬
Short sentencing ‫أسلوب(استعمال) اجلمل القصًنة‬
Show of muscles ‫إبراز العضالت‬/‫استعراض العضالت‬
Silly mistake ‫غًن متوقع‬/‫سخيف‬/‫خطأً أبله‬
Simile ‫تشبيه‬
Simple style ‫أسلوب بسيط‬
Simplicity ‫بساطة‬
SL (Source language ‫(را‬
Slang ‫سوقي‬
Social acceptability ‫قبول(تقبل)اجتماعي‬
Socratic irony ‫هتكم سقراطي‬/‫سخرية القدر‬
Solution by solution ‫حالً بعد آخر‬/ً‫حالً حال‬
Source language(SL) ‫األصل‬/‫اللغة ادلصدر‬
Special expression ‫تعبًن خاص‬
Specialist institutions ‫مؤسسات متخصصة‬
Specific culture ‫ثقافة خاصة‬
Square brackets ‫أقواس مربعة‬
Standard meaning ‫معىن معتمد‬/‫معىن معياري‬
Step by step ‫خطوةً خطوًة‬
Strange irony ‫هتكم ادلتناقضات‬/)‫سخرية غريبة(عجيبة‬
Strangeness ‫غرابة‬
Stress ‫نرب‬/‫شدة‬
Strong language ‫لغة قوية‬
Style ‫أسلوب‬
Style of indirectness ‫أسلوب ادلراوغة‬/‫أسلوب غًن مباشر‬
Stylistic device ‫مسة أسلوبية‬/‫أداة أسلوبية‬
Stylistic effect ‫تأثًن أسلويب‬
Stylistic equivalence ‫مرادفة أسلوبية‬/‫ترادف أسلويب‬
Stylistic feature ‫مسة أسلوبية‬
Stylistic function ‫وظيفة أسلوبية‬
Stylistic impact ‫تأثًن(أثر)أسلويب‬
Stylistic problems ‫مشاكل أسلوبية‬
Stylistic reason ‫مربر أسلويب‬/‫سبب أسلويب‬
Stylistic tone ‫نغمة أسلوبية‬
Stylistics ‫دراسة األسلوب‬/)‫علم األسلوب(األساليب‬/‫أسلوبية‬
Subjectivity ‫شخصانية‬/‫ذاتية‬
Sublime ‫رفيع‬/‫سام‬
Substitute verb ‫فعل بدبل‬
Subtitled T.V. series/programs ‫مسلسالت تلفزيونية مرتمجة‬/‫برامج‬
Superficial translation ‫ترمجة خاطئة‬/‫ترمجة سطحية‬
Sunna(h) )‫السنة(الشريفة‬
Surprising metaphor )‫استعارة مدهشة(مثًنة‬
Synonymous ‫مرتادف‬/‫مرادف‬/‫تراديف‬
Synonyms ‫مرتادفات‬/‫مرادفات‬
Synonymy )‫لفظي‬/‫ترادف(معجمي‬
Syntactic ambiguity ‫غموض حنوي‬
Syntactic complexity ‫تعقيد حنوي‬
Target Language(TL) ‫الرتمجة‬/‫اللغة اذلدف‬
Technical terms ‫مصطلحات فنية‬
Temporal connectors/conjunctions )‫روابط توقيتية(شرطية‬
Term ‫مصطلح‬
Tester translation )‫ترمجة اختبارية(جتريبية‬
Theories of translation ‫نظريات الرتمجة‬
Title ‫لقب‬
TL (Target language‫(را‬
Tone (of voice) )‫نغمة(الصوت‬
Tools of Arabization ‫وسائل التعريب‬
Topic and comment ‫ادلبتدأ واخلرب‬
Tradition ‫تراث‬/‫تقليد‬
Traditional approach ‫منهج تقليدي‬
Trainee translators ‫مرتمجون متدربون‬
Transcription ‫نسخ‬/‫رسم لفظي‬
Transference ‫نسخ‬/‫حتويل‬
Transmission ‫نقل‬
Transmit ‫ينقل‬
Translation couplet ‫ثنائية‬/)‫ثنائي (ترمجة‬
Translation label )‫ترمجة مؤقتة(مشروطة‬
Translation procedures ‫حلول(دلشاكل) الرتمجة‬/‫إجراءات الرتمجة‬
Triplet ‫ثالثية‬/)‫ثالثي(ترمجة‬
Type of readership ‫نوع(نوعية)القراء‬
Type of text ‫منط النص‬
Type of text and context ‫منط النص والسياق‬
UN acronyms ‫سلتصرات األمم ادلتحدة‬
Unclarity ‫ال وضوح‬/‫انعدام الوضوح‬
Uncommon meaning ‫معىن غًن شائع‬
Uncountable nouns ‫أمساء غًن معدودة‬
Unified theory ‫نظرية موحدة‬
Unit by unit ‫وحدةً بعد أخرى‬/ً‫وحدةً وحدة‬
Unit of translation ‫جزء من ادلعىن‬/‫وحدة ترمجة‬
Unity of Arabization ‫وحدة التعريب‬
Unseen meaning ‫معىن خفي‬/‫معىن غًن مرئي‬
Unsuitable readers ‫قراء غًن مناسبٌن‬
Unsuitable context ‫سياق غًن مناسب‬
‫‪Vandalism‬‬ ‫ختريب‪/‬العيث فساداً‬
‫‪Variation‬‬ ‫تنوع‪/‬تنويع‬
‫‪Verbal sentences‬‬ ‫مجل فعلية‬
‫‪Verbal word order‬‬ ‫ترتيب كالم فعلي‪/‬ترتيب اجلملة الفعلية‬
‫‪Verbalization‬‬ ‫فعلية‪/‬تفعيل‪/‬استعمال األفعال دون األمساء‬
‫)‪Version(of translation‬‬ ‫رواية(ترمجة)‬
‫‪Vocabulary‬‬ ‫مفردات اللغة‪/‬رصيد الكلمات‬
‫‪Vocal cords‬‬ ‫احلبال الصوتية‬
‫‪Voice‬‬ ‫صيغة‪/‬صوت‬
‫‪Vowelization / vocalization‬‬ ‫تشكيل‪/‬شكل(باحلركات األربع)‬
‫‪Vulgar‬‬ ‫سوقي‬
‫‪Vulgar Arabic‬‬ ‫اللغة العربية السوقية‬
‫‪Well-established translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة معتمدة‬
‫‪West Germanic Language‬‬ ‫لغة جرمانية غربية‬
‫‪Western culture‬‬ ‫ثقافة غربية‬
‫‪Westernization‬‬ ‫تغريب‬
‫‪Word by word‬‬ ‫كلمةً كلمةً‪/‬كلمةً بكلمة‪/‬كلمة بعد أخرى‬
‫‪Word-for-word translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة كلمة بكلمة‬
‫‪Word in combination‬‬ ‫كلمة مرتكبة(مع غًنها)‪/‬يف السياق‬
‫‪Words in isolation‬‬ ‫كلمات منفردة(مبعزل عن غًنها)‪/‬خارج السياق‬
‫‪Words of contrast‬‬ ‫كلمات مغايرة‬
‫‪Words of obligation‬‬ ‫كلمات اإللزام‪/‬كلمات الوجوب‬
‫‪Word order‬‬ ‫ترتيب كالم‪/‬ترتيب كالمي‪/‬ترتيب كلمي‬
‫‪Word play‬‬ ‫تالعب باأللفاظ‬
‫‪Wrong translation‬‬ ‫ترمجة خاطئة‬
‫‪Zero article‬‬ ‫غياب أداة التعريف؛ التنكًن(النكرة)‬
 References

The contents of this textbook have been reproduced from original sources for
educational purposes only and all the cited references are documented below.
Copyright permission is already printed on most of the included exercise handouts.
The topics covered in this course have been selected carefully so that they address
the varying needs of ESL students.

Duff, A.(1981), The Third Language, (Pergamon Press).

Durant, A. and Fabb, N.(1990), Literary Studies in Action, (Routledge).

Eliot, T. S. (1972), The Waste Land and Other Poems, (Faber and Faber: London).

Elyaziji, I. (1970) An Arabic Book of Synonyms and Collocations(in Arabic),

(Beirut: Libraire de Liban).

(Manchester University Press).

Fawcett, P. (1998), “Ideology and Translation”, in Baker, M.(ed.), Routledge

Fowler, H. (1926), Fowler‟s Modern English Usage (2nd ed. 1965), (O.U.P.)

1993), (Macmillan).