INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
1
INTRODUCTION
In this research, we find out the relationship between social support,
psychological distress and quality of life in diabetic patient. Diabetes is one of the major
concerns in the third millennium, affecting more people every day. The most important method
to control this disease and prevent its hurdles is self-care. According to various studies, this
method has not found its proper place among patients with diabetes due to several reasons.
(WHO,2009).
Currently, diabetes is known as one of the major public health concerns in the third
millennium and is the fifth main mortality cause in the world. Psychological distress can act as
distorted views of the personality and is disclosed by sadness, anxiety and symptoms of
psychological illness (Gundelach &Henry ,2016). Psychological distress is a condition of
emotional distress, generally identified by train sick of depression and anxiety(Doran,2011).
Diabetes is a disease with high and increasing prevalence rate that can affect all
aspects of patient’s life. In this disease the patient faces many hurdles in the whole life. Health-
related quality of life provides a normless perspective that encompasses a patient’s physical,
emotional and social functioning. Several studies examining the effects of insulin use and
quality of life found that insulin was associated with significantly greater improvements in
quality of life. (FORTIN,2006).
The purpose of this study was to analyze the global quality of life in a group of
diabetes mellitus patients without major complications and to assess the correlations with
glycemic control and the difference between diet, oral therapy and insulin therapy. The quality
of life for diabetic patients can vary based on various factors such as their overall health,
disease management, support system, access to health care and psychological well-being.
Proper management of diabetes through medication, diet, exercise and regular monitoring can
significantly improve quality of life by reducing the risk of complications and promoting and
overall well-being.
1.1: Social Support:
According to Barness and Duck social support refers to Everyday behaviors that, whether
directly or indirectly, communicate to an individual that she or he is valued and cared for by
others.
Social support is defined as the perception or experience that one is loved and cared for by
others, admired and valued, and part of a social network of mutual assistance and obligations
(Wills, 1991). Social support may come from a partner, relatives, friends, social and community
ties, and even a devoted pet (Allen, Blascovich, &Mendes,2002). According to this hypothesis,
social support acts as a reserve and resource that the effect of stress or enables an individual to
deal with stress more effectively, but otherwise is less eventful for mental and physical health
(Cohen& Wills, (1985). After decades of research, evidence for both type of effects has
emerged. Measures of social integrations typically show direct associations with mental and
physical health, but not buffering effects(Thoits,1995).
Informational
Emotional
Esteem
Social network support
Tangible support
Social support is affiliated with overall better mental health. There is also proof that diabetic
patients with higher social support cope better psychologically than those without such
support. However, there has been insufficient research about the effect of social support
among people who have knowledgeable diabetic patients. There is considerable evidence that
those with greater social support (defined as the social resources that persons perceive to be
available or that are actually provided to them by non-professionals (Cohen and Gottlieb ,2000
cited in Gottlieb and Bergen,2010) have better mental health than those with less social
support (Kawachi and Berkman,2001, Barrera,1986, Lakey Orehek,2011, Cohen and Wills,1985).
Social support has been imagined in many ways –but has commonly been measured. Social
support can be categorized into different types.
According to social support theory, diabetic patients benefits from various forms of
support, including emotional, information and instrumental support. The theory suggests that a
strong social support system can appreciate a diabetic patients coping abilities and improve
overall health outcomes. Social support refers to the material, emotional and informational
assistance obtained from one’s social networks, which usually reflects the closeness and quality
of a person’s connectedness with others (Depression perceived by Zhiya Hua).
Diabetes is considered to be the leading cause of heart disease, stroke kidney failure,
lower limb amputation and blindness among US adults. According to the American Diabetes
Association, the management of diabetes can be costly, generating both large direct and
indirect medical cost. Social support plays a crucial role in managing diabetes affectively. Social
support can provide emotional encouragement, practical assistance, and information sharing,
which can help individuals cope with the challenges of living with diabetes, adhere to treatment
plans, make healthy lifestyle choices, and reduce stress.
Today, this disease is being paid more attention due to its high prevalence,
imposed costs on health systems, and various negative effects on the patients. Suffering from
chronic complications of diabetes leads to the decrease in life expectancy and increase in
death, imposes high economic burden on the person, family, and society and effects the life
quality of the person and his/her family (Esteghamati et.al,2008).
Depression is one of the most important risk factors for dementia (Livingston et
al.,2020). However, evidence is scarce on whether the risk of incidents dementia may also be
elevated in people with mild or moderate psychological distress, which sometimes may indicate
the onset of depression, anxiety and other mental disorders(VandenBos,2007).Thus,
psychological distress would be a medical concern mostly when it is accompanied by other
symptoms that when added up, satisfied the diagnostic criteria for psychiatric
disorder(Horwitz,2007).Here are psychological distress can manifest in various forms are given
below:
In 1948 the world health organization defined health from a new perspective, stating that
health was defined not only be the absence of disease and condition, but also by the presence
of physical, mental and social well-being. People with diabetes often feel challenged by their
disease and its day-to-day management demands. Patients must deal with diabetes all day,
every day, making countless decisions in an often ineffective effort to approximate the non-
diabetic metabolic state. As a consequence, researchers and health plan administrators are
focusing on shorter-term patient outcomes, including functional health status, satisfaction with
health care, and overall quality of life. The goals of monitoring psychosocial well-being and
quality of life in people with diabetes include: identification of patients who are depressed or
anxious; evaluating new treatments by identifying psychological costs and benefits; and
identifying dissatisfaction with treatment and other aspects of car (Arfken CL,1996).
According to Petito and Cummins, subjective quality of life among adults is unusually
consistent on a population basis, while QOL is lower and unstable in adolescence. Thus it seems
important to study the development of QOL during the transformation from adolescence to
early adulthood. The concept of QOL is grounded in welfare research and can be used at both
the societal and the individual level. There is no unity about the measuring of QOL and thus no
generally accepted definition, but it is a common view that welfare is a broader concept that
includes QOL.Measuring QOL at the societal level can, for example, include variable such as
level of living, salary dispersal, suicides rate and health status in the population. At the
individual level QOL can refer to variables such as health status, standards of living, work and
housing conditions or felt satisfaction, well-being and life satisfaction.
Quality of life can be considered as a guide of whole well-being and satisfaction in life.
Self-reliance, social inclusion, and social relationships define individual’s quality of life,
experienced by emotional, physical and tangible elements of well-being. Ones quality of life is
effected by their attitudes, experiences and status in cultural and ethical framework. These are
in relation to the goals, expectations and requirements and considerations of an individual’s
(Poduzov Yazkova). Quality of life reflects a person’s satisfaction with success in life (Produzov
&Yazykova) and can also be seen as a procedure that objectives to realize their potential
(Reinders & Schalock).
The quality of life for diabetic patients can vary based on several factors including their
ability to manage their condition, access to healthcare, complications from diabetes ,support
system and overall health.Daibetic exposes people to both physical(cardiovascular
disease,neuropathy,diabetic foot and stroke etc.)and psychological complications(e.g.
Depression and emotional distress).The impact of disease and of treatment on all chronic
patients quality of life and life style is a key concern for both the patients themselves and their
physicians(Setacci& Donato,2009).Generally, individuals with well-controlled diabetes who
actively manage their condition through medication,diet,exercise and regular medical checkups
tend to have a better quality of life compared to those with poorly managed diabetes.
Complications from uncontrolled diabetes such as neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular
issues, can significantly impact quality of life. Access to resources education about the
condition, psychological support and a supportive social network also play important roles in
enhancing the quality of life in diabetic patients.