Pattern of Mobile Phone Usage Among Medical Students: February 2020
Pattern of Mobile Phone Usage Among Medical Students: February 2020
Pattern of Mobile Phone Usage Among Medical Students: February 2020
net/publication/339077531
CITATION READS
1 164
1 author:
Anand Dixit
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Anand Dixit on 06 February 2020.
Abstract Aims and Objectives: The aim is to study the pattern of mobile phone usage among medical students.
Materials and Methods: A cross‑sectional study was conducted among medical students of 2nd year MBBS
at SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. A preformed, pretested questionnaire was used. Data were
analyzed statistically by simple proportions.
Results: The response rate was 92.13%. Of 164 students, 96 were male and 68 were female. The mean age
of students was 20.04 ± 0.67. Almost 100% of respondents had smartphones. Nearly 48% of students had
downloaded medical apps on their mobile phones. The most common age group of starting internet use
among the respondents was 11–20 years. Daily use of the internet was 3–6 h/day by most of the medical
students. Most of the students used mobile phones for the purpose of social networking (n = 76) followed
by online shopping (n = 56). About 32.92% of students used mobile for academic purpose. Nearly 59.75%
of students obtained 41%–60% of marks in spite of extensively using smartphones which shows that they
are rationally using their phones in improving their academic performance. The association between time
in hours spent on mobile phones and marks obtained in the examination held in the past 3 months was
statistically nonsignificant (2 = 10.369, degree of freedom = 9, P = 0.321). About 57.29% of students were
suffering from nomophobia (NMP), 26.82% of students were at risk of NMP, and only 13.20% of students
were having no NMP. Nearly 58.53% of students had ringxiety.
Conclusion: Our study gives a brief idea about the addiction of mobile phones among medical students.
There is a definite need of further studies in this field.
The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Practice‑based learning and improvement,
Medical knowledge, Interpersonal and communication skills, Professionalism.
118 © 2019 International Journal of Academic Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Sharma, et al.: Pattern of mobile phone use among medical students
Of 164 students, 96 were male and 68 were female. Daily use of the internet was 3–6 h/day by most of
The mean age of students was 20.04 ± 0.67. Other the medical students (n = 123) followed by <2 h
demographic data of the students are depicted in (20 students). Thirteen students used mobile for
Table 1. 7–10 h but the maximum use of internet >10 h/day
was done by eight students.
Almost 100% of respondents had smartphones. One
hundred and forty‑one students owned a single mobile Most of the students used mobile phones for the
phone. Only 23 had two mobile phones. All students purpose of social networking (n = 76) followed by
had internet on their mobile phones. One hundred online shopping (n = 56). About 32.92% of students
and fifty‑three students recharged their mobiles used mobile for academic purpose. We were very
monthly, whereas six students twice a month, and surprised to see the changing trend of shopping and
only five students had to recharge thrice a month. not only females, but male respondents also used phone
Seventy‑nine students had downloaded medical apps for online shopping. The main purpose of the mobile
on their mobile phones. phone usage by respondents is as depicted in Figure 2.
The most common age group of starting internet The maximum use of internet on mobile was found at
use among respondents was 11–20 years (156 night time (n = 98), followed by evening (n = 32),
students) followed by 21–30 years (5 students). Only afternoon (n = 22), and minimum use in the
three students started using smartphones at the age morning (n = 12).
of <10 years as shown in Figure 1.
Majority 40.85% of medical students preferred to keep
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the study their mobile phones on silent mode, while 35.82% of
participants students kept their phones on ringing and 20.12% on
Sociodemographic Characteristic group Number of vibration mode. Only 9.75% of students were dare to
parameters respondents (%)
detach themselves from mobiles by switching them
Age 19‑20 129 (78.65)
21‑22 30 (12.19) off during the study hours.
23‑24 5 (3.04)
Sex Male 96 (58.53) One hundred and thirteen students operated mobile
Female 68 (41.46)
Education of father Illiterate 12 (7.31) phones at home or hostel while eating foods or when
Up to 12th 24 (14.63) relaxing. 30 students used their phones in the library
Graduation 68 (41.46) and 11 students operated their phones while driving.
Postgraduation 60 (36.58)
Socioeconomic Lower middle class 47 (28.65) Only 10 students confessed that they used their phones
status Middle class 36 (17.07) even during attending lectures in the classrooms.
Upper middle class 81 (49.39)
Employment of Working 156 (95.12)
father Not working 8 (4.87)
Most of the students (n = 98) obtained 41%–60% of
Status of living Living in nuclear family 69 (42.07) marks in spite of extensively using smartphones which
Living in joint family 39 (23.78) shows that they are rationally using their phones in
Living in hostel 56 (34.14)
Locality Urban 86 (52.43) improving their academic performance. When we
Rural 78 (47.56) applied nonparametric statistical tests (Chi‑square test)
Figure 1: Depicting age of starting internet use on smartphones Figure 2: Main purpose of mobile phone usage
and calculated P value to see an association between response rate in our study was quite good because
time in hours spent on mobile phones and marks the questionnaire was distributed directly to the
obtained in the examination held in the past 3 months, students in person rather than E‑mailing them.
we found that it was not statistically significant as E‑mailing of questionnaire or WhatsApp is used
P > 0.05, as shown in Table 2. very frequently for these types of studies which
affects response rate as well as results also. Sharma
Apart from internet addiction, 76 respondents et al. 2015[4] have also reported a good response
confessed that they had other addiction also. There rate of 90.76%.
was no incidence of self‑injurious behavior or suicidal
thoughts among respondents. In our study, we found male preponderance which
is in contradiction to a study conducted by Prasad
NMP was assessed among respondents as per et al. 2017[9] and Farooqui et al. 2018[13] and a few
elaborated in previous studies[4,8‑10] and we found that other studies.[4,14,15] Male preponderance was also
57.29% students were suffering from NMP, 26.82% documented by a study done in Central India with
of students were at risk of NMP, and only 13.20% 53% of males and 47% of females.[8]
of students were having no NMP. When we saw the
gender‑based prevalence of NMP then it was found Gavali et al. 2017[12] documented in their study that
to be nonsignificant (P > 0.05) as shown in Table 3. 80% of medical students used downloaded medical
applications on their mobile phones to aid learning.
About 57.92% of students panicked when they Moreover, in our case, only 48% (n = 79) of students
misplaced their cellphone, 22.56% became desperate had downloaded medical applications. While in a
for their phones, while 18.29% of students were study done in Indore, only 19% of medical students
relieved. Majority of students used to check their used medical apps.[4]
mobile phones as soon they wake up in the morning.
Most of the respondents cited that they used to check Prasad et al. 2017[9] and Aman et al. 2015[16] found
their phones for messages and other updates every in their study that if students spend more time
30 min. Some respondents used to check it a couple on phone, they score low marks in professional
of times a day. This shows their desperation as well examinations. In contrary to this, we found that
as obsession about their smartphones. About 59% of there is no statistically significant association
students used to keep their mobile phones beside their between time spent on mobile phones and marks
bed. 58.53% of students had “ringxiety.” obtained in the recent examination (P > 0.05).
Similar results were documented in previous
DISCUSSION literature by Ezemenaka in 2013 that there is no
significant relationship affecting the academic
The response rate in our study was 92.13% which performance of students in using internet enabled
is higher than other Indian studies. [11,12] The phones.[17]
Table 2: Association between time in hours spent on mobile
We found that 57.29% of students were suffering
phones and marks obtained in examination held in the past
3 months from NMP and 26.82% students were at risk of NMP
Time in hours spent Marks obtained in last examination which is quite greater that a study done in 2017 by
on mobile phones (h) <40% 41%‑50% 51%‑60% >60% Total Prasad et al., which showed 24.12% of prevalence of
<2 0 6 13 3 22 NMP and 40.97% of prevalence of having a risk of
3‑4 2 16 88 14 120 being nomophobes.[9]
5‑6 0 2 11 1 14
>6 1 2 5 0 8
Total 3 26 117 18 164 Basu et al. 2018[18] reported 40% of the participants
Chi‑square test=10.369, df=9, P=0.321. df=Degree of freedom with NMP from Delhi, and Dasgupta et al. 2017 from
Kolkata[19] reported NMP in 42.6% medical students Financial support and sponsorship
assessed with the NMP‑Q questionnaire. Nil.
Maximum use of internet in our study was 3–6 h/day 1. Reham A J, Khadijah S, Haleem A. Patterns of use of ‘smart phones’ among
which is in agreement to studies done by Prasad et al. female medical students and self‑reported effects. J Taibah Univ Med Sci
2012;7:45‑9.
2017.[9] 2. Choi JS, Yi B, Park JH, Choi K, Jung J, Park SW, et al. The uses of the
smartphone for doctors: An empirical study from Samsung medical center.
It can be assumed that there has been increasing trend Healthc Inform Res 2011;17:131‑8.
of smartphone uses with new technologies in the 3. Jamal A, Temsah MH, Khan SA, Al‑Eyadhy A, Koppel C, Chiang MF, et al.
Mobile phone use among medical residents: A cross‑sectional multicenter
past decade. There are both pros and cons of mobile survey in Saudi Arabia. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016;4:e61.
phone usage during student life. It helps us to connect 4. Sharma N, Sharma P, Sharma N. Rising concern of nomophobia amongst
with our family and friends, but on the other hand, Indian medical students. Int J Res Med Sci 2015;3:705‑7.
5. Davey S, Davey A. Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian
there is clinching evidence of its increasing subjective
adolescents: A mixed method study by systematic‑review and meta‑analysis
symptoms due to its overuse among nomophobics. approach. Int J Prev Med 2014;5:1500‑11.
6. Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Use of wireless telephones and
Limitations self‑reported health symptoms: A population‑based study among Swedish
Our study included a small cohort so future studies adolescents aged 15‑19 years. Environ Health 2008;7:18.
7. Ikeda K, Nakamura K. Association between mobile phone use and
on larger groups are needed because addiction of depressed mood in Japanese adolescents: A cross‑sectional study. Environ
mobile phones has become an epidemic. Further Health Prev Med 2014;19:187‑93.
comparative studies are recommended and the 8. Dixit S, Shukla H, Bhagwat A, Bindal A, Goyal A, Zaidi AK, et al. A study
to evaluate mobile phone dependence among students of a medical
results should be compared with students of other college and associated hospital of central India. Indian J Community Med
departments or even with nonmedical students and 2010;35:339‑41.
the general population. 9. Prasad M, Patthi B, Singla A, Gupta R, Saha S, Kumar JK, et al.
Nomophobia: A Cross‑sectional study to assess mobile phone usage among
CONCLUSION dental students. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC34‑9.
10. Yildrim C, Correia AP. Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia:
Development and validation of a self‑reported questionnaire. Comput Hum
This study highlights the prevalence of NMP among Behav 2015;49:130‑7.
medical students and its woeful outcomes because 11. Rohilla R, Rohilla J, Rohilla A, Singh K. Academic use and attitude of the
very few students used mobile phones for academic 1st year medical students toward smartphones in a North Indian city. Digit
Med 2016;2:13.
purpose. There should be increased awareness about 12. Gavali MY, Khismatrao DS, Gavali YV, Patil KB. Smartphone, the new
increasing incidence of NMP not only among medical learning aid amongst medical students. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:JC05‑8.
students but general population also. We suggest 13. Farooqui IA, Pore P, Gothankar J. Nomophobia: An emerging issue in
medical institutions? J Ment Health 2018;27:438‑41.
more study in this field, especially in larger sample of 14. Sharma MK, Rao GN, Benegal V, Thennarasu K, Thomas D. Technology
population to get more accurate results. addiction survey: An emerging concern for raising awareness and promotion
of healthy use of technology. Indian J Psychol Med 2017;39:495‑9.
Acknowledgment 15. Nikhita CS, Jadhav PR, Ajinkya SA. Prevalence of mobile phone dependence
The author would like to acknowledge gratitude to in secondary school adolescents. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:VC06‑9.
16. Aman T, Shah N, Hussain A, Khan A, Asif S, Qazi A. Effects of mobile
all the medical students who sincerely participated in phone use on the social and academic performance of students of a public
the study. sector medical college in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Khyber J Med Sci
2015;8:99‑103. mobile phone usage among medical students in Delhi. Indian J Psychol
17. Ezemenaka E. The usage and impact of Internet enabled phones on Med 2018;40:446‑51.
academic concentration among students of tertiary institutions: A study at 19. Dasgupta P, Bhattacherjee S, Dasgupta S, Roy JK, Mukherjee A,
the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Educ Dev Using Inf Commun Technol Biswas R. Nomophobic behaviors among smartphone using medical and
2013;9:162‑73. engineering students in two colleges of West Bengal. Indian J Public Health
18. Basu S, Garg S, Singh MM, Kohli C. Addiction‑like behavior associated with 2017;61:199‑204.