Ai Doc 2
Ai Doc 2
Ai Doc 2
net/publication/378130102
Article in EPRA International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies · February 2024
DOI: 10.36713/epra15747
CITATION READS
1 1,380
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Muhammad Balbaa on 11 February 2024.
ISSN: 2347-4378
Dr. A. Singaraj, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D.,
Chief Editor SJIF Impact Factor 2024 : 8.431
Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra1013
Mrs. M. Josephin Immaculate Ruba
Managing Editor
Editorial Board
1. Dr. Nawab Ali Khan, M.Com, M.Phil, Ph.D., Monthly Peer Reviewed & Indexed
College of Business Administration, International Journal
Salman Bin Abdulaziz University,
Al- Kharj – 11942,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
2. Dr. Gajendra Naidu.J., M.Com, LL.M., M.B.A., PhD.
MHRM Volume: 11 Issue: 2 February 2024
Botho University,
Gaborone Campus,
Botho Education Park,
Kgale, Gaborone, Indexed By:
Botswana.
3. Dr. Mussie T. Tessema
Winona State University,
MN, United States of America,
4. Dr. Mengsteab Tesfayohannes,
Sigmund Weis School of Business,
Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove,
PENN, United States of America,
5. Dr. Abidova Zaynab Kadirberganovna,Ph.D
Urgench Branch of the Tashkent Medical Academy
Urgench, Khorezm,
Uzbekistan.
6. Dr. Anne Maduka
Anambra State University,
Igbariam Campus,
Nigeria.
7. Dr. C. Satapathy
Amity Business School,
Bhubaneswar,
Orissa, India.
8. Dr. Noor Afza, MBA., Ph.D.,
Tumkur University,
Tumkur,
Karnataka, India.
9. Dr. Sumita Bharat Goyal
Central University of Rajasthan,
Bandar Sindri, Dist-Ajmer, Published By :EPRA Publishing
Rajasthan, India
10. Dr. C. Muniyandi, M.Sc., M. Phil., Ph. D,
School of Economics,
CC License
Madurai Kamaraj University,
Madurai-625021,
Tamil Nadu,
Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra1013|SJIF Impact Factor (2024): 8.431 ISSN: 2347-4378
EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies (EBMS)
Volume: 11 | Issue: 2|February 2024 -Peer-Reviewed Journal
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology that has the potential to revolutionize decision-
making processes across diverse industries and domains (Russell & Norvig, 2016). Through the utilization of machine
learning, natural language processing, and neural networks, AI systems possess the capability to analyze extensive
datasets, detect patterns, and generate insights to support decision making. The integration of AI in decision making
offers numerous benefits, including enhanced efficiency, improved accuracy, and advanced predictive analytics
(Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014). However, this integration also presents challenges and ethical considerations that
necessitate careful examination. A comprehensive understanding of the impact of AI in decision making is crucial for
researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to harness its potential effectively.
1.2 Objective
The objective of this research article is to provide a comprehensive review of the impact of AI in decision making.
This article aims to explore and analyze the advantages, challenges, and ethical considerations associated with the
integration of AI systems in decision-making processes. By critically examining existing literature and analyzing
relevant case studies, this article seeks to offer insights into the current state of AI in decision making and its potential
future developments. The findings of this study can inform decision makers, researchers, and policymakers in utilizing
AI technologies responsibly and effectively in various domains.
Figure 4: Expected Benefits Delivered To Marketing & Sales Due to Implementing Artificial Intelligence,
Demand Metric, 2019.
3.5 Improved Predictive Analytics
AI techniques, particularly machine learning algorithms, excel in predictive analytics. These algorithms can
analyze historical data to identify patterns and trends, enabling accurate predictions of future outcomes (Provost &
Fawcett, 2013). Improved predictive analytics can support decision makers in various domains, including finance,
marketing, and healthcare, by providing insights into customer behavior, market trends, and disease prognosis.
Figure 5: Historical changes in quality and novelty of human decisions in Go. (Shin, 2023)
Historical changes in quality and novelty of human decisions in Go. Panel A (Panel B) shows the fixed effect of each
year (month) on decision quality along with its 95% CI, estimated using the median of Decision Quality Indices of all
decisions made by each player in each year (month). Similarly, Panel C (Panel D) shows the fixed effect of each year
(month) on novelty as measured with the Novelty Index, along with its 95% CI, estimated using the median of Novelty
Indices of all games for each player in each year (month).OPEN IN VIEWER
6.2 Finance
AI technologies have found extensive use in the financial sector for decision making and risk management. AI
algorithms can analyze financial data, market trends, and trading patterns to make predictions and support investment
decisions (Bao et al., 2017). AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants are being utilized to provide personalized
financial advice and improve customer experience (Rahman et al., 2021). By leveraging AI, financial institutions can
make more informed decisions, enhance risk assessment, and optimize portfolio management (Astanakulov,& Balbaa,
2023).
Figure 8: Fraud detection has the highest potential for AI in the financial sector. v7labs.com, 2022
algorithms can analyze customer feedback and sentiment to inform decision makers about customer preferences and
concerns (Liu et al., 2020). These AI-driven solutions streamline customer service processes, enable faster response
times, and enhance customer satisfaction.
Figure 10: Contact center efficiency improves with AI adoptation: A 1 year view. dialpad.com, 2022.
documentation of AI models, data sources, and decision criteria can help mitigate concerns related to bias, unfairness,
and lack of explainability.
9. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the impact of AI in decision making is significant and multifaceted. AI technologies have the potential
to enhance decision-making processes across various domains, including healthcare, finance, transportation, and
customer service. However, the integration of AI in decision making also presents ethical challenges and social
implications that need to be addressed.
Ethical considerations in AI-driven decision making include algorithmic bias, privacy protection, transparency, and
accountability. Algorithmic bias can perpetuate inequalities and lead to unfair outcomes, while privacy concerns arise
due to the collection and utilization of personal data. Transparency and explainability are crucial to ensure trust and
understanding in decision-making processes, while human oversight and accountability are necessary to prevent blind
reliance on automated systems.
Several case studies highlight the practical application of AI in decision making, such as its use in healthcare for
medical diagnosis and treatment planning, finance for investment decisions and risk management, transportation and
logistics for route optimization, and customer service for enhanced interactions. These examples demonstrate the
potential benefits of AI in improving decision outcomes and efficiency in various industries.
However, it is important to consider the ethical and social implications of AI in decision making. Job displacement
and the impact on the workforce, equity and accessibility, privacy and data protection, accountability and transparency,
and human-AI collaboration and responsibility are critical areas that require attention. Future directions should focus
on the development of ethical frameworks and guidelines, robust data governance, interdisciplinary collaboration,
continuous monitoring and auditing, and ethical training and awareness.
As AI continues to evolve and become more integrated into decision-making processes, it is essential to navigate the
ethical complexities and ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a responsible and accountable manner. By
addressing these challenges and embracing ethical considerations, AI can be harnessed as a powerful tool to augment
human decision making and contribute to positive societal outcomes.
REFERENCES
1. Abderrahmane Bettayeb, Muhammad Eid Balbaa. (2023). Success Factors in Adopting AI in Human Resource
Management in UAE Firms: Neutrosophic Analysis. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 21 ( 3 ), 154-165.
https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.210315
2. Abdulaziz A. Abduvaliev, Abduvali A. Isadjanov, Umidjon A. Dadabaev, Muhammad Eid Balbaa. (2023). Neutrosophic
Framework for Analyzing Factors of innovation in the Development of Uzbekistan: features and modern tendencies. Journal
of International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 21 ( 3 ), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.210303 Bao, Y., Xie, L., &
Yang, X. (2017). Predicting stock returns with textual news data. Decision Support Systems, 94, 24-35.
3. Abdurashidova, M., Balbaa, M., Nematov, S., Mukhiddinov, Z. & Nasriddinov, I. (2023). The impact of innovation and
digitalization on the quality of higher education: A study of selected universities in Uzbekistan. Journal of Intelligent
Systems, 32(1), 20230070. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2023-0070
4. Aldoseri, Abdulaziz, Khalifa N. Al-Khalifa, and Abdel Magid Hamouda. 2023. "Re-Thinking Data Strategy and
Integration for Artificial Intelligence: Concepts, Opportunities, and Challenges" Applied Sciences 13, no. 12: 7082.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127082
5. Astanakulov, O., Balbaa, M.E. (2023). The Use of the Internet of Things to Ensure the Smooth Operation of Network
Functions in Fintech. In: Koucheryavy, Y., Aziz, A. (eds) Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks
and Systems. NEW2AN 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13772. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30258-9_40
6. Belenguer, L. (2022) AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible
machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI Ethics 2, 771–787.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8
7. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant
Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
8. Bughin, J., Manyika, J., & Woetzel, J. (2017). A Future That Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity.
McKinsey Global Institute.
9. Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain
human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183-186.
10. Cavoukian, A., & Jonas, J. (2019). Privacy by Design in the Age of Big Data. Information and Privacy Commissioner of
Ontario.
11. Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Dryer, T., Fried, G., Green, B., Kaziunas, E., & Reddy, S. (2019). AI Now Report 2019. AI Now
Institute.
12. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-
116.
13. Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017). Dermatologist-level
classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115-118.
14. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Luetge, C. (2018). AI4People—An
ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines,
28(4), 689-707.
15. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions. Harvard
Business Review Press.
16. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and
Prediction. Springer.
17. Ijaz Uddin, Maaz Ahmad, Dilshod Ismailov, Muhammad Eid Balbaa, Akbarali Akhmedov, Sarvar Khasanov, Manzoor Ul
Haq (2023), Enhancing institutional quality to boost economic development in developing nations: New insights from CS-
ARDL approach. Research in Globalization. Vol. 7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100137.
18. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9),
389-399.
19. Liu, Y., Du, J., Tian, W., & Shi, B. (2020). Sentiment analysis of online reviews: A survey of the state of the art and
applications. Information Processing & Management, 57(5), 102311.
20. Morgan, Forrest E., Benjamin Boudreaux, Andrew J. Lohn, Mark Ashby, Christian Curriden, Kelly Klima, and Derek
Grossman, 2020. Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Concerns in an Uncertain World. Santa Monica,
CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3139-1.html. Also available in print form.
21. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
22. Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science for Business: What You Need to Know about Data Mining and Data-
Analytic Thinking. O'Reilly Media.
23. Rahman, M. A., Haque, M. E., Gondal, I., & Hasan, R. (2021). Robo-advisors in finance: A comprehensive review. Journal
of Business Research, 133, 218-237.
24. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson.
25. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models
instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215.
26. Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Ben-David, S. (2014). Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge
University Press.
27. Minkyu Shin, Jin Kim, Bas van Opheusden, and Thomas L. Griffiths, 2023. Superhuman artificial intelligence can improve
human decision-making by increasing novelty. PSYCHOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES. PNAS. Vol. 120
No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214840120
28. Shladover, S. E. (2017). Automated vehicles and the future of the freeway: Are we ready for the 21st century?
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 80, 286-303.
29. Stock, J. R., Boyer, S. L., & Harmon, D. S. (2018). Logistics and supply chain management. Cengage Learning.
30. Srinivasan, A. (2018). Machine Learning with R. Packt Publishing.
31. Topol, E. J. (2019). Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books.
32. Weller, A. (2017). Transparency in algorithmic decision-making: A multimodal perspective. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM
Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 565-580.