SCHOOL OF LAW

Academic Session
2023-2024

BBA.LLB (Hons.) Sem- 8th

SEMINAR PAPER
On
FREEDOM OF INTERNET

Subject -Internet Regulation

Submitted by Submitted to
Alisha Ali Usmani Mr. Rajat Dixit
Admn. No. 20GSOL1030011
ABSTRACT

The Internet plays a crucial role in modern life, offering numerous benefits across various

sectors. In education and the economy, it enables global communication and collaboration,

supports international financial transactions, and provides a platform for learning and

teaching. In the realm of health, the Internet facilitates telemedicine and online health

consultations, which became particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic. It

enhances connectivity by linking people with their loved ones and fostering cross-border

social connections. The Internet also grants access to a vast repository of information, aiding

personal growth, research, and skill development. However, the Internet also has notable

disadvantages. The anonymity it provides can lead to abusive behavior such as trolling,

cyberbullying, and stalking. Users may inadvertently encounter violent, pornographic, or

otherwise inappropriate content. The Internet can be addictive, resulting in wasted time and

distractions, particularly in the workplace. The Internet is also a hub for cybercrime,

including identity theft and hacking, and raises significant privacy concerns due to the large

amounts of shared data. Misinformation spreads rapidly online, causing confusion and

misleading the public. Meanwhile, the Internet is a powerful tool for education, economic

growth, health, connectivity, information access, business opportunities, and entertainment, it

also poses risks related to abusive behaviour, inappropriate content, addiction, work-life

balance, cybercrime, privacy, misinformation, social isolation, and mental health challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To outline the importance and disadvantages of the internet

To outline the subjects that needed to be focused to give freedom of the internet

To outline the concept of the Freedom on the Net report

To highlight the regulations to oppress the misuse of the internet

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This research work is mainly a legal analysis. This study is mainly based on analysis of the

primary data (Trademark Act, 1999 and the Consumer Protection Act, 1956) and secondary

data (Which consist of various websites, journals, articles, magzines and books related to

Intellectual Property Laws). Descriptive method of research is used to gather information

about the present existing conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Internet freedom encompasses several crucial aspects that collectively define the liberties

individuals have in the digital realm. Digital rights, which are fundamental human and legal

rights, enable people to access, use, create, and publish digital media, as well as to utilize

computers and other electronic devices. Freedom of information is a key component,

ensuring the right to access online information without censorship or restrictions. The right to

internet access posits that everyone must be able to connect to the Internet to fully exercise

their rights to freedom of expression and opinion, along with other fundamental human

rights. Freedom from internet censorship underscores the necessity for individuals to access

any online content without it being blocked or censored. Net neutrality is another cornerstone

of internet freedom, advocating that all internet traffic should be treated equally. This

principle opposes any discrimination or preferential treatment based on the type, kind, or
nature of content. It ensures a level playing field where all data, whether from large

corporations or individual users, is given equal priority1.

Organizations such as Freedom House play a vital role in evaluating internet freedom

globally. Their annual Freedom on the Net report provides a comprehensive assessment of

online freedom in various countries 2. This report includes a ranked, country-by-country

evaluation, offering a detailed global overview of the latest developments in internet freedom.

Additionally, it provides in-depth reports on individual countries, highlighting specific

issues and trends.

However, internet freedom is a multifaceted concept involving digital rights, freedom of

information, the right to internet access, freedom from censorship, and net neutrality. These

elements collectively ensure that individuals can fully engage with and benefit from the

digital world. Evaluations by organizations like Freedom House help monitor and promote

internet freedom, shedding light on global trends and country-specific challenges, thus

fostering a more open and accessible online environment.

IMPORTANCE AND DISADVANTAGES OF INTERNET

The Internet is indispensable in today’s world, bringing numerous benefits but also

presenting challenges that impact internet freedom. Its importance spans various sectors,

1. Altman, Alex (2008-02-20). "A Coming Chill Over Internet Freedom?". Time. ISSN 0040-
781X. Archived from the original on 2021-12-07. Retrieved 2019-12-09.

2
https://freedomhouse.org/
significantly influencing education, the economy, health, connectivity, information access,

and entertainment.

Importance of the Internet:

 Education and Economy: The Internet provides a vast array of educational

resources, allowing students to access information and learning materials from

anywhere. It supports the economy by enabling e-commerce, remote work, and global

business operations, thereby driving economic growth and innovation.

 Health and Well-being: Telemedicine and online health consultations have

revolutionized healthcare, making medical services accessible to people in remote

areas. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Internet became crucial for maintaining

healthcare services and public health information dissemination.

 Connectivity: The Internet connects people globally, fostering communication and

collaboration. Social media and communication platforms help maintain relationships

and build cross-border connections, enhancing social interactions.

 Information Access: The Internet democratizes information, providing users with

access to a wealth of knowledge. It empowers individuals to educate themselves, stay

informed, and participate in societal discourse.

 Opportunities: The Internet opens up opportunities for entrepreneurship and business

development, allowing individuals to start and grow businesses, access markets, and

create jobs. It enables individuals to improve their lives and contribute to community

development.
  Entertainment: The Internet offers diverse entertainment options, including

streaming services, online gaming, and digital content, catering to various interests

and preferences.

Disadvantages Affecting Internet Freedom:

 Trolls, Bullying, and Stalkers: The anonymity of the Internet can lead to abusive

behavior such as trolling, cyberbullying, and stalking. This can create a hostile online

environment, infringing on individuals' freedom to safely express themselves.

 Inappropriate Content: Users may inadvertently encounter violent, pornographic, or

otherwise inappropriate content, which can be distressing and harmful, especially for

children.

 Addiction and Distractions: Internet addiction can lead to significant time wastage

and distractions, particularly affecting productivity in the workplace and academic

settings.

 Work-Life Balance: The Internet can blur the lines between work and personal life,

making it difficult for individuals to disconnect and maintain a healthy work-life

balance.

 Cybercrime: The Internet is a breeding ground for illegal activities, including

identity theft, hacking, and other forms of cybercrime. This compromises individuals'

security and privacy.

 Privacy Concerns: With the increasing amount of data shared online, privacy has

become a significant concern. The misuse of personal information by companies and

hackers undermines trust in online platforms.

  Misinformation: The rapid spread of false or misleading information can lead to

confusion and misinformation, impacting public opinion and decision-making.

 Social Isolation: Excessive Internet use can lead to social isolation, as people may

prioritize online interactions over face-to-face engagements, affecting their social

skills and mental health.

Meanwhile, the Internet is a powerful tool that supports education, economic growth, health,

connectivity, information access, and entertainment, it also poses challenges that impact

internet freedom. Addressing these disadvantages is crucial to ensuring a balanced and free

online environment that maximizes the benefits of the Internet while minimizing its risks.

PROVISIONS RELATED TO INTERNET SHUTDOWN (INDIA)

Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, read with Temporary Suspension of Telecom

Services (Public Emergency and Public Safety) Rules, 2017: These rules allow the union or

state home secretary to order the suspension of any telegraph service (including internet) in

case of public emergency or public safety.

Such an order must be reviewed by a committee within five days and cannot last for more

than 15 days. In an urgent situation, an officer of joint secretary level or above, authorized by

the union or state home secretary, can issue the order.

However, the law does not define what qualifies as an emergency or safety issue. The

Supreme Court, in the landmark Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India case, 2020 reiterated that

internet shutdowns violate fundamental rights to freedom of expression and shutdowns

lasting indefinitely are unconstitutional.

Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: This section empowers a district magistrate,

a sub-divisional magistrate or any other executive magistrate specially empowered by the

state government to issue orders to prevent or stop any nuisance or disturbance of public

tranquillity.

Such orders can include the suspension of internet services in a particular area for a

specified period.

Concerns Related to Internet Shutdown

Violation of Rights: Internet shutdowns violate Fundamental Rights under Article 19(1)(a)

and Article 19(1)(g). The freedom of speech and expression and freedom to practice any

profession over the medium of the internet enjoy constitutional protection under Article

19(1)(a) and Article 19(1)(g) - the Supreme Court in Anuradha Bhasin vs Union of India case

(2020). Internet Shutdown also violates Right to Information which has been declared as a

Fundamental Right under Article 19 by the Supreme Court in Raj Narain vs State of UP

(1975) case. Internet Shutdowns also violate the Right to Internet which was declared a

Fundamental Right under Article 21 by the Kerala High Court in Faheema Shirin v. State of

Kerala case.

Lack of Accountability: Shutdowns are often implemented without clear legal frameworks

or oversight mechanisms, leading to arbitrary and disproportionate restrictions on internet

access. The absence of accountability mechanisms exacerbates the risk of abuse of power by

authorities, who may impose shutdowns without adequate justification or recourse for

affected individuals.

Economic Disruption: Beyond the immediate social and political implications, internet

shutdowns have significant economic repercussions. Disruptions to online commerce,

communication, and financial transactions disrupt business operations, hinder economic

growth, and deter investment, ultimately undermining long-term development objectives.

According to Top10VPN, India lost Rs 2,091 crore ($255.2 million) in the first half of 2023

because of internet shutdowns.

Social Disruption: Shutdowns disrupt the fabric of society by impeding communication

networks, hindering access to vital services, and isolating individuals from their communities.

Social cohesion may suffer as a result, as people are unable to connect, organize, or mobilize

effectively, leading to feelings of isolation and alienation.

SUBJECTS TO BE FOCUSED FOR FREEDOM OF INTERNET

Ensuring internet freedom requires a multifaceted approach, focusing on various subjects that

address legal, technical, social, and ethical dimensions. Key areas of focus include:

Digital Rights and Human Rights:

 Legislation and Policy: Advocate for laws and policies that protect digital rights as

fundamental human rights. This includes the right to access, use, create, and publish

digital content.

 Privacy Protections: Implement robust data protection regulations to safeguard

personal information from misuse by corporations and government entities.

Net Neutrality:

 Equal Access: Ensure that all internet traffic is treated equally, without discrimination

or preferential treatment based on content type, source, or user.

  Regulatory Oversight: Establish independent regulatory bodies to enforce net

neutrality principles and address violations effectively.

Freedom from Censorship:

 Anti-Censorship Measures: Develop and promote technologies that circumvent

censorship, such as virtual private networks (VPNs) and decentralized networks.

 Transparency and Accountability: Require governments and companies to be

transparent about content removal requests and provide clear, accessible appeals

processes.

Right to Internet Access:

 Infrastructure Development: Invest in expanding internet infrastructure, especially in

underserved and rural areas, to ensure equitable access.

 Affordability Initiatives: Implement programs to make internet access affordable for

all socio-economic groups, including subsidies and low-cost service plans.

Cybersecurity and Safety:

 Security Standards: Promote and enforce strong cybersecurity standards to protect

users from cyber threats, such as hacking, identity theft, and malware.

 Education and Awareness: Increase public awareness about online safety practices and

provide resources for safe internet use.

Combatting Misinformation:

 Fact-Checking and Verification: Support independent fact-checking organizations and

develop tools for verifying information accuracy.

 Media Literacy: Integrate media literacy into educational curriculums to equip users

with skills to critically evaluate online information.

Balancing Freedom and Regulation:

 Ethical AI and Algorithm Use: Ensure that algorithms used by platforms are

transparent and free from bias, promoting fair and unbiased access to information.

 Content Moderation: Develop balanced content moderation policies that protect free

expression while addressing harmful content effectively.

International Cooperation:

 Global Standards: Promote the adoption of international standards and agreements

that uphold internet freedom across borders.

 Cross-Border Initiatives: Collaborate with international organizations to address

global challenges such as cybercrime and internet censorship.

Support for Whistleblowers and Activists:

 Legal Protections: Provide legal protections for whistleblowers and activists who

expose abuses of internet freedom.

 Safe Platforms: Develop and maintain secure platforms for activists and journalists to

share information without fear of reprisal.

Focusing on these subjects will help create a balanced and open internet environment that

supports freedom of expression, protects user rights, and fosters innovation and growth.

FREEDOM ON THE NET

The Freedom on the Net report, published annually by Freedom House, is a comprehensive

assessment of internet freedom worldwide. This report evaluates the level of digital freedom

in various countries, providing detailed analyses and insights into the global state of online
liberties. The report serves as a critical tool for understanding the challenges and progress

related to internet freedom, offering a snapshot of how different nations fare in terms of

allowing their citizens to freely access and use the Internet.

Components of the Freedom on the Net Report,

Country Assessments: The Freedom on the Net report provides detailed country

assessments, covering a wide range of nations and evaluating their internet freedom based on

standardized criteria. Each country's performance is documented in a separate section,

highlighting specific issues and developments. The scoring system rates countries on a scale

from 0 to 100, where lower scores signify higher levels of internet freedom. These scores are

derived from indicators grouped into three main categories: Obstacles to Access, Limits on

Content, and Violations of User Rights. This comprehensive evaluation helps to understand

the state of internet freedom in each country and track changes over time.

Mainly focuses on Obstacles assesses factors limiting internet access, such as infrastructure

quality, economic barriers, and restrictive government policies, Limits on Content which

examines the extent of censorship and self-censorship, the diversity of online news media,

and content manipulation and Violations of User Rights that focuses on legal and extra-legal

repercussions for online activities, surveillance practices, privacy protections, and

individuals' ability to freely express themselves online.

Global Overview: Report includes a global overview that highlights key trends, emerging

threats, and significant improvements in internet freedom over the past year and Regional

Analysis provides a regional breakdown, identifying specific challenges and advancements

within different parts of the world.

Purpose and Impact:

Awareness and Advocacy: Raising Awareness about the state of internet freedom globally,

shedding light on both progress and areas needing improvement and Advocacy Tool serves

for policymakers, activists, and organizations working to promote digital rights and freedoms.

Policy Influence: Informing Policymakers for the detailed assessments and recommendations

help about the necessary steps to enhance internet freedom in their respective countries and

International Pressure report can create on countries with poor internet freedom scores to

implement reforms.

Supporting Civil Society: Resource for Activists reports provides civil society organizations

with valuable data and insights that support their efforts to advocate for greater internet

freedom and Monitoring Progress serves as a benchmark for monitoring progress over time,

helping to track improvements or declines in internet freedom.

The Freedom on the Net report is a vital resource that offers a thorough evaluation of global

internet freedom, highlighting the obstacles, restrictions, and violations faced by internet

users worldwide. By providing detailed country assessments, identifying trends, and

supporting advocacy efforts, the report plays a crucial role in promoting and defending

internet freedom globally.

REGULATIONS TO OPPRESS MISUSE OF INTERNET

Regulating the misuse of the internet poses a complex challenge that requires multifaceted

approaches at both national and international levels. Governments worldwide have

implemented various regulations aimed at addressing issues such as cyberbullying, online

harassment, hate speech, terrorist propaganda, and the dissemination of illegal content. These

regulations often involve the enactment of laws specifically targeting cybercrimes, with

penalties for offenders ranging from fines to imprisonment. Law enforcement agencies and
specialized cybercrime units are tasked with investigating and prosecuting individuals or

groups engaged in illegal online activities, utilizing digital forensics and other technological

tools to gather evidence.

Moreover, content regulation and moderation play a significant role in curbing internet

misuse, with governments mandating internet platforms to implement policies for removing

harmful or illegal content. Platforms may also be held accountable for content shared on their

platforms through intermediary liability laws, encouraging them to adopt proactive measures

for content moderation and user protection. In addition to content regulation, data protection

and privacy laws are enforced to safeguard users' personal information and prevent its misuse

by corporations and governments. Organizations are required to obtain user consent for data

collection and processing activities, and penalties may be imposed for violations of data

protection regulations.

Furthermore, cybersecurity measures are essential for preventing cybercrimes and

safeguarding internet infrastructure from cyberattacks. Governments promote cybersecurity

standards and best practices, requiring organizations to implement security measures such as

encryption and intrusion detection systems. Education and awareness initiatives are also

crucial in empowering users to navigate the internet safely and responsibly. Public awareness

campaigns and digital literacy programs educate individuals about online safety practices,

cyber threats, and the importance of protecting personal information. Integrating digital

literacy and cybersecurity education into school curricula equips individuals with the skills

and knowledge to recognize and mitigate online risks. Finally, international cooperation is

vital for addressing global challenges related to internet misuse, such as cyberterrorism and

cyber espionage. Governments collaborate with other countries and international

organizations to develop common standards and strategies for combatting internet misuse,
sharing information and intelligence on cyber threats, and engaging in diplomatic efforts to

promote a safe and secure online environment for all users.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the internet stands as a cornerstone of modern society, revolutionizing

communication, education, commerce, and entertainment. Its vast benefits are undeniable,

facilitating global connectivity, access to information, and opportunities for innovation and

growth. However, alongside its virtues come significant challenges and risks that threaten

internet freedom and individual liberties.

The multifaceted nature of internet freedom demands comprehensive approaches to address

its complexities. By focusing on digital rights, net neutrality, freedom from censorship, and

ensuring universal access, societies can safeguard the principles of openness and equality that

underpin a free internet. Additionally, initiatives like the Freedom on the Net report provide

invaluable insights into global internet freedom trends, empowering advocates, policymakers,

and civil society to drive positive change and hold governments accountable.

Yet, as technology evolves, so do the threats to internet freedom. Regulations to combat the

misuse of the internet must adapt and innovate, leveraging legal frameworks, technological

advancements, and international cooperation to mitigate cybercrimes, protect privacy, and

promote responsible online behavior.

Moreover, fostering digital literacy and awareness is crucial in empowering individuals to

navigate the online landscape safely and responsibly, mitigating the risks of misinformation,

cyberbullying, and online exploitation.

Ultimately, achieving and preserving internet freedom requires a concerted effort from

governments, civil society, technology companies, and individuals alike. By upholding the

principles of openness, inclusivity, and respect for human rights, societies can harness the

transformative power of the internet while mitigating its pitfalls. In doing so, they can ensure

that the internet remains a force for good, driving progress, fostering innovation, and

empowering individuals to thrive in the digital age.

REFERENCES

1. Due to legal concerns the OpenNet Initiative does not check for filtering of child pornography and
because their classifications focus on technical filtering, they do not include other types of
censorship.

2. ^ Jump up to:a b Internet Enemies Archived 23 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Reporters
Without Borders (Paris), 12 March 2012

3. ^ "India: Freedom on the Net 2022 Country Report". Freedom House. Retrieved 13 June 2023.

4. "Indian Computer Emergency Response Team", website, Department of Information Technology,

Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India
5. "Endorsing piracy akin to endorsing terrorism: Producer Ritesh Sidhwani". financialexpress.com.
24 August 2016. Retrieved 18 January 2017
6. ^ "Google, Microsoft, Yahoo Will Block Indian Gender-Selection Ads". Bloomberg.com. 19 September 2016.
Retrieved 19 September 2016.
7. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. (2010). U.S. Initiatives to Promote Global Internet
Freedom. Issues, Policy, and Technology. S.l]:
[s.n.]. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a516461.pdf Archived 2019-12-04 at the Wayback
Machine Retrieved on 12/3/19.
8. ^ Cook, Sarah. "5 Predictions for Beijing's Assault on Internet Freedom in 2021". thediplomat.com. The
Diplomat. Archived from the original on 7 December 2021. Retrieved 14 December 2020.
9. SIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION (APEC). 2004. APEC privacy framework, adoptado en la 16a
Reunión Ministerial de APEC, 17 y 18 de noviembre de 2004, Santiago de Chile.

10. BARLOW, John Perry. 1996. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, 8 de febrero, Davos, Switzerland.
Available at: https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html. Last accessed on: 16 Mar. 2013.

11. BERTONI, Eduardo. (Comp.) 2012. Hacia una Internet libre de censura: propuesta para América Latina. Buenos
Aires: Universidad de Palermo.