Research Thesis (AI)
Research Thesis (AI)
Research Thesis (AI)
May 2024
Table of Contents:
Chapter 1:
The Problem
Statement of the Problem
Hypothesis of the Study
Significance of the Study
Research Methodology
Design
Environment and Participants
Instrument
Definition of Terms
References
Chapter 1
The Problem and the Scope
Introduction
Rationale
Assessing Satisfaction with AI-Powered Essay Writing Tools for Fostering Critical Thinking
Skills of IMS Grade 10 Learners
User Satisfaction with AI-Enhanced Essay Writing: Implications for Critical Thinking
Development of IMS Grade 10 Learners
Theoretical-Conceptual Framework
Grade 10 Learners of
IMS - Bilar
Essay Writing and
Critical Thinking
The Problem
1.1 age;
1.3 gender;
Hypothesis
Design
This quantitative study employed the descriptive-
comparative survey method design using the modified
questionnaires for the data gathering. Descriptive and
inferential statistics are employed for the data analysis and
interpretation of the results. This study used the findings as
the basis in proposing recommendations.
Instrument
This study utilized a modified questionnaire in measuring
the satisfaction of artificial intelligence tools on essay
writing assignments and critical thinking of Grade 10 IMS
students.
Procedure
A. Pre-Data Gathering. The researchers sent a letter to
study.
results.
Statistical Treatment
The researchers used the following formula for the data
analysis:
Sample Percentage. To determine the quantitative relation
to the whole response for the profile of the respondents, the
researchers used the percentage. The formula is:
P=f/n x 100
Where:
P= Percentage
f= Frequency
n= Total Population
WM= ∑WF
N
Where:
WM= Weighted Mean
WF= Weighted Frequency
N= Population Size
Definition of Terms
References:
Ally M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots in Education: Promise and Pedagogical
Implications. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3),
226–241.
Cath, C. (2018). Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal and Technical Opportunities and
Challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and
Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180080.
Jordan, M. I., Mitchell, T. M., & Kleinberg, J. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: The Revolution Hasn't
Happened Yet. Harvard Data Science Review, 3(1).
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The Ethics of Algorithms:
Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171667967.
Siemens, G., & Gasevic, D. (2012). Guest Editorial - Learning and Knowledge Analytics. Educational
Technology & Society, 15(3), 1–2.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Tsigaris, P. (2018). The Illusion of Open Access in the Predatory World of
Publisher-Led Scholarly Journals. The Serials Librarian, 74(3-4), 261–279.
Tuffield, M., Böhmer, M., Cheshire, C., Crane, G., Nowakowski, P., Robertson, S., & Weikum, G.
(2020). AI for Science, Health, and Engineering: A 2020 Review. IEEE Access, 8, 56101–
56128.
Name: Date:
a. age:
o under 13 years old
o 13 years old or above
b. socio-economic status
o Lower Class
o Lower Middle Class
o Upper Middle Class
o Upper Class
c. gender:
o Male
o Female
d. grade level:
o Grade 7
o Grade 8
o Grade 9
o Grade 10
e. educational background:
o Attended all grades (Kindergarten to Grade 6)
o Skipped one or two grade
Design
Instrument
Procedure
Statistical Treatment
Definition of Terms
Artifical Intelligence
ChatGPT
Essay writing
Critical thinking skills
overreliance