Module 5 Notes - IEFT (Modified)
Module 5 Notes - IEFT (Modified)
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
In the above example, USA has an absolute advantage over the production of wheat
over UK because it is able to produce 10 units of wheat with one unit of Labor. But
UK can produce only 5 units. Similarly UK has an absolute advantage over the
production of cloth. Hence US will produce and export wheat to UK and UK will
produce and export cloth to US. Both the countries will gain from international
trade. This kind of production leads to specialization and division of labor. But
according to Adam Smith, division of Labor is limited to the size of the market.
Adam Smith’s theory is criticised that it is too narrow in its scope because it
explains only one aspect of trade, that is absolute advantage.
Comparative advantage theory
Comparative cost advantage theory was developed by David Ricardo in 1857. JS
mill, Marshall and others refined it later. According to Ricardo, even in the case of
a country for which there is no absolute advantage for both the commodities, it can
gain from international trade. In this situation, the country should specialize in the
production and export of the commodity in which its absolute disadvantages smaller
and import the commodity in which its absolute disadvantage is greater. In other
words, a country should specialize in the production of that commodity in which it
is more efficient and leave the production of the other commodity to the other
country.
Assumptions
Comparative cost advantage theory of Ricardo is based on the following
assumptions.
• There are only two countries and two commodities.
• There are no barriers in international trade.
• There is no transport cost.
• Labor is the only component of cost of production.
• There is perfect competition and full employment.
• Labor is homogeneous.
• Labor is perfectly mobile within the country.
Goods are exchanged according to the relative amount of labor embodied in
them.This theory is explained with the help of the following example
In his two commodity two country model, Ricardo has taken cloth and wine as two
commodities and England and Portugal as two countries.
The above example shows that Portugal has an absolute advantage in the production
of both the commodities. However, a comparison of the ratio of the cost of wine
production with ratio of the cost of cloth production in these two countries reveals
that Portugal has a higher advantage in the production of wine. Hence Portugal will
specialize in wine production and produce wine. At the same time, England has a
comparative advantage in cloth production and it will produce cloth. England can
import wine from Portugal and Portugal can import cloth from England. Both the
countries have mutual gain from trade as explained below.
Portugal will gain if it can get anything more than 0.88 units of cloth for one unit of
wine. Similarly England will gain if it has to sacrifice anything less than 1.2 units
of cloth. Therefore, any exchange ratio between 0.88 and 1.2 units of cloth for one
unit of wine will bring a gain for both the countries.
Criticisms
The important criticisms against comparative cost theory are:
• Labor is not the only element of cost
• Exchange ratio is not always fixed
• Assumption of full employment and perfect competition are not valid.
• The assumption of free trade is highly unrealistic.
• If one country is very small and the other country is big, the big country
cannot sell its entire surplus to the small country
In this example, country A has more capital in absolute terms but country B is
endowed with or abundant in capital because the ratio of capital to labour is high in
country B.
Factor price Equalization Theorem.
It is also called Heckscher- Ohlin-Samuelson theorem. It was proved by Paul
Samuelson.
The theorem states that free international trade will equalize factor prices between
countries relatively and absolutely. In a country, international trade increases the
demand for abundant factors because specialization takes place on the basis of this
abundant factor; therefore prices of the abundant factors increase. Similarly, the
demand for the scarce factors decreases and hence their prices also decrease ; thus
when a country export goods containing a large proportion of the relatively
abundant and cheap factors and import goods containing a large proportion of
scarce factors, it may act as substitute for interregional factor movements and lead
to factor price equalization.
Merits of Heckscher-Ohlin theory
1. Heckscher Ohlin theory provides a more satisfactory explanation for foreign trade
2. This theory explained the reason for comparative cost differences between nations
in terms of factor abundance or endowments.
3. This theory highlights the role of relative prices of factors in determining the
trade flow.
4. Heckscher Ohlin theory highlights the impact of trade on product and factor
prices.