Ferrari Group Case
Ferrari Group Case
Ferrari Group Case
Chunying Ma
Mehakpreet Kaur
Theresa Blair
Cash 450,000
Unearned warranty revenue 450,000
To Record extra warranty sales ($9,000,000 x
10% x 50%)
Contingencies
Liability due to lawsuits 300,000
Expense due to lawsuits 300,000
To correct entry made for estimated contingent
loss on lawsuits ($325,000 recorded to $25,000
+ $ 0)
Lease
Lease liability 100,000
1|Page
Rental expense 100,000
DATE ACCOUNTS DEBIT CREDIT
(To correct the 1st payment made on the leased
assets, where the lease liability should be
debited instead of rental expense)
2|Page
LaFontaine Automotive
$808,089
Jan 1, 2023 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $708,089
Jan 1, 2024 $100,000 $42,485 $57,515 $650,574
Jan 1, 2025 $100,000 $39,034 $60,966 $589,609
Jan 1, 2026 $100,000 $35,377 $64,623 $524,985
Jan 1, 2027 $100,000 $31,499 $68,501 $456,484
Jan 1, 2028 $100,000 $27,389 $72,611 $383,873
Jan 1, 2029 $100,000 $23,032 $76,968 $306,906
Jan 1, 2030 $100,000 $18,414 $81,586 $225,320
Jan 1, 2031 $100,000 $13,519 $86,481 $138,839
Jan 1, 2032 $100,000 $8,330 $91,670 $47,170
Jan 1, 2032 $50,000 $2,830 $47,170 $0
$808,089
Reconciliation between Accounting Income and Taxable Income
CCA (400,000)
3|Page
APPENDIX 4 - MEMO TO LARRY LaFontaine
To: Larry LaFontaine, President, and CEO - LaFontaine Automotive Class Cars Co.
I hope this memo finds you well. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to work for your
company. I wanted to bring to your attention certain accounting entries related to warranty
transactions recorded in 2023 that may require further clarification and adjustment. After
reviewing the entries, it appears that there might be misunderstanding in the recording of these
transactions. The entry suggests that $ 125,000 in cash was debited to the warranty expense
account. The credit to cash accounts suggests immediate cash payment for warranty repairs.
However, under the accounting principles, warranty expenses are accrued, and cash is not
immediately affected. They should have credited the warranty liability instead of cash to
represent the accrual of future warranty expenses in a correct way. Additionally, the recording of
actual warranty repairs as an expense in a lump sum doesn’t align with the estimated repair work
under the 5-year warranty coverage. Recognition of warranty expense should have spread over
the 5-year warranty period to match the estimated repair work. In the 2nd entry to record amount
received for the extended warranties, Cash has been debited appropriately for the amount
received, it’s crucial to review the recognition of extended warranty revenue. The recognition of
revenue for extended warranties should be spread over the coverage period, and the entire
amount should not be recognized at the time of sale. Should have credited unearned warranty
4|Page
After reviewing the legal expenses accrual for the lawsuits brought by Tommy Tires and Edna
Engine, we found out that the entry has recorded the maximum possible loss for both lawsuits.
The assessment of Lawyer that Tommy is likely to receive between $25,000 and $50,000 was
not considered. Edna Engine’s case was deemed too unusual to establish an estimated outcome,
even then $250,000 was recorded. When the lawyer’s assessment is given. We need to recognize
a range of potential outcomes rather than recording the maximum possible loss. As Edna’s case
was too unusual to establish an estimated outcome, it’s recommended to disclose this uncertainty
in the financial statements and should not record any liability amount until the outcome is more
predictable.
While looking at the portion of the income statement affected by the lease, we noticed some
mistakes made by the new accountant and items that were missed. First, the accountant made an
incorrect payment on the lease; due to this mistake the rental expense was too high by $100,000
and the lease liability was too low by $100,000. This was corrected by decreasing the rental
expense and increasing the lease liability by $100,000 each. Next, the capital assets were too low
as the capital asset of land and building were not recorded so we increased capital assets by
$808,090 ($404, 045 for the value of the land, and $404, 045 for the value of the building). We
also recorded $57,515 for the current portion of the lease liability and $750,575 for the long-term
portion of the lease liability. The amortization table below shows the details. The accountant also
Some mistakes were found regarding taxable income as well. Firstly, dividend income is not
taxable, so we need to eliminate the dividend income of $15,000 from the tax return. Secondly, a
5|Page
lawsuit is never allowed to be deducted as an expense on the tax return, the $25,000 lawsuit
incurred in this case needs to be added back. Thirdly, the $12500 actual warranty repair costs
incurred in a year can be deducted as an expense. In addition, the $20,200 depreciation of lease
property expenses also needs to be deducted from the tax return. Finally, the membership dues
are not deductible for tax purposes, we still need to add back $20,000.
After calculating the net income after taxes, the next step involved providing a comprehensive
breakdown of the Earnings Per Share (EPS) calculation in the recent financial statement. The
4.44 EPS calculated by the new accountant was wrong. Please find below the analysis of basic
Basic EPS:
Based on the weighted average number of shares, both the dividends for preferred shares and the
Dilution Analysis:
Preferred Shares:
6|Page
Test: Basic EPS - Dilution effect = $2.42 - $2.00 = $0.42 per share
Convertible Bond:
Test: Basic EPS - Dilution effect = $2.42 - $3.20 = ($0.78) per share (Antidilutive)
Warrants:
Dilution effect: $0
Options:
Dilution effect: $0
7|Page
Test: Basic EPS - Dilution effect = $2.42 - $0 = $2.42 per share
Fully Diluted Weighted Average Shares: 150,000 + 25,000 + 10,000 + 10,000 = 195,000
In summary, the basic EPS stands at $2.42 per share, and the fully diluted EPS, considering all
Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further clarification.
8|Page
APPENDIX 5 - EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION
9|Page
APPENDIX 6 - MARKING GUIDE
Identify the accounting areas that were not done properly, why was it
wrong according to IFRS and what was the general impact on the financial
results
Identify what the proper accounting treatment should be
Professional appearance – appealing layout, use of headings and
subheadings, proper font type/size and margins, double spaced 17
Proper grammar, no spelling mistakes
Discussion is relevant, coherent, concise, logical, and flows smoothly
Communicate to the audience – Larry is not a professional accountant so
do not use accounting jargon such as journal entries, debits, credits,
adjusting entries, accruals, matching principle, revenue recognition,
timing differences and so on.
10 | P a g e