0601201601
0601201601
0601201601
net/publication/301730665
CITATIONS READS
2 4,203
5 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Gitanjali Deokar on 30 April 2016.
Research Article
Department of Quality Assurance, MET's Institute of Pharmacy, Bhujbal Knowledge City, Adgaon Nashik,
Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT
A spectrophotometric method has been developed for the determination of paracetamol in a dosage form
and in Pharmaceutical preparation. The method is based on the reaction of p-aminophenol group of the
drug with ninhydrin in N, N. dimethylformamide (DMF) medium producing a coloured complex which
absorbs maximally at 547 nm. Beers law is obeyed in the concentration range 1-3μg/ml and with set
parameter the method is validated, LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.254, 0.770 and 0.2849, 0.863 by
standard deviation of blank and calibration curve method respectively. As it is having least sum square
error that is 1.448667 × 10 -5. Method is found to be specific for the para amino phenol, data supported
by ANOVA test with at P ≤ 0.05. For accuracy and precision we are 99℅ sure that the results lie between
100.32-99.26℅ and 100.19 to 100.07℅ respectively. From the principle of energy of activation the force
degradation of Paracetamol in tablet dosage form is carried out at 100ᵒc for 3 days, degradation of
Paracetamol was found to be 0.7℅ Hence the method is developed and validated for the detection of p-
amino phenol, a degradation product of paracetamol and by using concept of energy of activation p-amino
phenol from paracetamol drug product is estimated the results were validated statistically.
Received 6 Jan 2016 Received in revised form 28 Jan 2016 Accepted 30 Jan 2016
Figure 1: Calibration Curve for p-amino phenol for LOD & LOQ (0.03 to 2µg/ml)
3.1.1.1. Calculation for Energy of Activation (Ea): For room temp and 600C
[ ]
[ ]
Table 10: Specific reaction rate constant Paracetamol Degradation in Bulk in hot air oven
(K1,at 1200 C)
Sr. Time Abs (a-x) Conc. (a-x) Log (a-x) K1 = 2.303 log a
No Minutes µg/ml t (a-x)
1 Initial 0.5995 8.4534 0.9270 ---
2 60 0.5979 8.4162 0.9251 7.25382 x 10-5
3 120 0.5648 7.6460 0.8834 8.36684 x 10-4
4 180 0.5413 7.10 0.8512 9.69482 x 10-4
5 240 0.5281 6.7930 0.8321 9.106414 x 10-4
6 300 0.5211 6.630 0.8215 8.0989185 x 10-4
Mean=7.06790614x 10-4/min
Table 11: Specific reaction rate constant Paracetamol Degradation in Bulk in hot air oven
(K2, at1400 C)
Sr. Time Abs (a-x) Conc. (a-x) Log (a-x) K2 = 2.303 log a
No Minutes µg/ml t (a-x)
1 Initial 0.5995 8.4534 0.9270 ---
2 60 0.5990 8.4418 0.9264 2.3028 x 10-5
3 120 0.5460 7.2093 0.8579 1.326029 x 10-3
4 180 0.5152 6.4930 0.8124 1.466192 x 10-3
5 240 0.4739 5.5326 0.7429 1.766592 x 10-3
6 300 0.4337 4.5977 0.6625 2.0304872 x 10-3
Mean = 1.3183206 x 10-3/min
Table 12: Specific reaction rate constant Paracetamol Degradation in Bulk in hot air oven
(K3, at 1600 C)
Sr. Time Abs (a-x) Conc. (a-x) Log (a-x) K3 = 2.303 log a
No Minutes µg/ml t (a-x)
1 Initial 0.5995 8.4534 0.9270 ---
2 60 0.5619 7.57907 0.8796 1.819212 x 10-3
3 120 0.5266 6.7581 0.82983 1.8646923 x 10-3
4 180 0.4740 5.5349 0.7431 2.35289016 x 10-3
5 240 0.4214 4.31163 0.63464 2.805436859 x 10-3
6 300 0.3688 3.0884 0.48973 3.356790609 x 10-3
Mean =2.439804386 x 10-3/min
3.1.2.1. Calculation for Energy of Activation (Ea): For 1200 C and 1400 C
[ ]
3.1.2.2. Calculation for Energy of Activation (Ea): For 1400 C and 1600C
[ ]
3.1.2.3. Calculation for Energy of Activation (Ea): For 1600 C and 1200 C
[ ]
respectively. Among the entire range 1 to was considered, indicates that the results lie
30 µg/ml Linearity range was found to be 2 between 100.32-99.26% and 100.19 to
to 12 µg/ml (Table 2, and Fig. 2) as it is 100.07% respectively (Table 4). From the
having least sum square error i.e. 1.448667 principle of energy of activation the forced
x 10-5. Method is found to be specific for the degradation of paracetamol in tablet dosage
para amino phenol, data supported by form is carried out at 100ºC for 3 days,
ANNOVA test with at P ≤ 0.05. For accuracy degradation of paracetamol was found to be
and precision confidence interval of 99% 0.7% (Table 13).