TOPIC: Linguistic

Essay 1
Learning language in some nations where people speak this language is an extremely
wonderful option, so many people suppose that we need to go to the nation where the
language is spoken to learn this language successfully. I partly agree with this opinion
about learning language.
Learning language in country where usually use it has a lot of benefits. First, everyone
around us will speak them, so we can listen, approach to them everywhere. Beside,
living in good environment help us improve the language, enrich our vocabulary,
grammar, like proverb: What is in close contact with ink will be black, what is near light
will be illuminating.
On the other hand, moving to other nation is not only way to improve, learn language.
Today, there are many programs, courses that help us improving our listening,
speaking, … through talking to local person directly. Moreover, internet is an enormous
knowledge source for us to get information, solve our problems. Learning through
internet also helps us a lot of money, time. For instance, Britishcouncil is a website
allowing us to communicate with foreigner, showing us mistakes and how to improve.
Another issue is not all people live in a region are good at their language. We also can
be affected by their bad hobbies such as wrong pronunciation, …
In conclusion, learning language in some nations where people speak this language is a
good choice for us to success in this work. In addition, there are many other ways to
learn language successful but the most essential thing is our effort. So, we need to
learn more and more to be good at language.
Essay2
Learning a language in some nations where people speak this language is an extremely
wonderful option. Therefore, some people suppose that we need to go to the nation
where the language is spoken to learn this language successfully. I partly agree with
this opinion about studying language and this essay will support my viewpoint.
Learning a new language abroad has a lot of benefits. First, everyone around us will
speak them, so we can listen, approach to them everywhere. Moreover, living in good
environment helps us improving the language, enrich our vocabulary, grammar, like s
proverb: What is in close contact with ink will be black, what is near light will be
illuminating.
On the other hand, to master a language, you do not necessary to go abroad.
Today, there are many programs, courses that help us improving our listening,
speaking, … through talking to local person directly. Moreover, internet is an enormous
knowledge source for us to get information, solve our problems. For instance,
Britishcouncil is a website allowing us to communicate with foreigners, showing us
mistakes and how to improve. Learning through internet also helps us save a lot of
money and time. other issue is not all people living in a region are good at their
language. We also can be affected by their bad habits such as wrong pronunciation, …
In conclusion, learning language in some nations where people speak this language is a
good choice for us to succeed in this work. Also, there are many other ways to learn
language successful but the most essential thing is our effort. So, we need to learn
more and more to be good at language.
Essay3
Language is the way of communication among mankind over the world. There are a lot
of languages in the world, but recently several languages are disappeared. Many argue
that it is not vital as lives will be simpler if there are a small of languages. I totally agree
with this statement by several main reason.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons why people believe that fewer
languages are good on this earth. Perhaps the main reason why the public is in favor of
this is necessary to acquire other languages except their mother tongue. For example, if
people know at least three, or four languages they may be able to understand other
nations' expressions and linguistics as well, which will help them to accumulate extra
knowledge about other cultures' lives. Further, most public's brains don't have much
ability to store more than two languages. So, it is useful for those humans if fewer
languages remained in the world.

In addition to this, one or two languages are made international work easier. Bata for
instance, Bata is a shoe company in Bangladesh, they expand their business to
Kolkata. This company easily establish their band outside Bangladesh, because both
places used same language. It will be hard if there was a several languages.
Furthermore, for extending business or create job overseas, there should have a few
languages.

To conclude, lives will be smoothly if all the world use particular languages. They can go
everywhere without any hesitation, and also can go for a career.

Essay4
There is an increase in the disappearance of several languages since some native
speakers use common languages instead of their indigenous tongue. Some argue that
financial resources are used to preserve these tongues is wasteful. I agree with this
statement and the essay will support my opinion.

Firstly, my strongly held belief is that governments should not waste money on saving
endangered languages. It is evident that these languages are less valuable and less
beneficial to people’s lives. Many studies show that saving a language will certainly cost
a large amount of money and only a few people particularly linguistics can benefit from
it and it increases the financial burden on a nation. In addition, it is widely known that
the loss of minority languages does not significantly impact people’s lives as only a few
people use them.

Secondly, some object to expense funding on language preservation. Facilities such as

infrastructure, healthcare or education systems play important roles in the growth of a
country. Therefore, the government should provide proper funding on these priorities.
Specifically, the advanced transport system will eliminate the economic gaps between
domestic regions and attract investment from powerful countries.

In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow indigenous tongues to
vanish, but in long term, this would have an extremely negative impact on the human
heritage and it should be used in more important issue.

TOPIC: Business
Tet’s hw
E1: Some people believe that doing business internationally carries more risks as it is
likely for businesses to come across unknown obstacles. Do you agree or disagree?
Businesses always have a sought to make profits and limiting their investments in social
or environmental initiatives is a noticeable idea. I partly agree with this idea and the
essay will support my opinion.
On the one hand, I accept that businesses have to make money in order to survive in a
competitive market. It seems true that the priority of any company is to response its
requirement, such as employees’ salary and payments for infrastructures. Moreover,
companies also need to invest in improvements and innovations if they want to develop
successful. If a company is unable to pay its bills or meet the changing needs of
customers, any concerns about social responsibilities become no effect.
On the other hand, companies should not focus on with only aim of making profit; they
have a wider responsibility in society. One social obligation that owners and managers
have is to treat their employees well. I also agree the idea that businesses could use a
proportion of their profits to support local charities, environmental projects or education
initiatives. Finally, instead of trying to reduce their tax payments, I believe that company
bosses should contribute to society through the tax system. Corporate Social
Responsibility helps the company have credibility and attract more customers.
In conclusion, I believe that companies should place as much importance on their social
responsibilities as they do on their financial aims. I hope that companies will focus more
on Corporate Social Responsibility to build a potential market.

E2: Some people believe that doing business internationally carries more risks as it is
likely for businesses to come across unknown obstacles. Do you agree or disagree?
Going abroad and doing business internationally is a huge opportunity to be successful
but it carries many risks for businesses to come across unknown obstacles. I partly
agree with this idea and the essay will support my opinion.

There is definitely a risk associated with doing business internationally, but it's not
always as daunting as people might think. One of the biggest challenges is making sure
your business complies with foreign regulations, but as long as you do your research
and take your time, it doesn't have to be too problematic. There's also the risk of having
to do extra work to establish relationships in other countries, which can be a bit
frustrating at times, but I think it's well worth it in the end.

It's tempting to launch into a new venture with all the enthusiasm in the world, but it's
often a better idea to take your time and ensure everything runs smoothly before
expanding into new markets. Otherwise, you could find yourself dealing with a lot of
unexpected problems which could end up costing you a lot of money in the long run. I
think people tend to go into international business without first investigating the market
and seeing what kind of opportunities there are. If they had taken the time to work out
how much demand there was for the products they were selling, they would have saved
themselves a lot of time, money and stress later on. The best way to avoid making
mistakes like this is to make sure you've done plenty of research before you start
anything risks involved in doing business in a foreign country.

To conclude, doing business internationally carries more risks as it is likely for

businesses to come across unknown obstacles, but we have many ways to avoid them.

E3: Most companies should practice some form of corporate social and environmental
responsibility. Do you agree or disagree with the opinion?

Corporate social and environmental responsibility is one of the most essential elements
of the company’s development. So, someone suppose that to be successful, a company
ought to practice some form of corporate social and environmental responsibility. I
totally agree with this opinion and the essay will support my view.

Environmental and social responsibilities are an integral part of business operations and
are considered among the most successful business strategies. It has been proved that
companies that integrate CSR into their business activity are more likely to attract
customers and outperform the competition. These companies have stronger
relationships with stakeholders and they outperform their peers in terms of performance
and growth. That is why companies are advised to consider these issues when planning
their business strategy. There are several reasons why CSR policies help businesses to
grow and achieve their goals. First of all, they contribute to the development of society
and help to ensure that everybody benefits from the company's activities. Secondly,
CSR policies strengthen a company's brand reputation and increase its credibility in the
marketplace. Lastly, they help to reduce costs by reducing waste and enhancing
productivity.

Over the last few decades, many large companies have made significant improvements
in areas such as human rights, environmental protection and energy conservation.
These efforts have enabled many companies to develop innovative solutions that
benefit society as a whole. Moreover, these acts help them make a good impression on
customers and investors, contribute to develop the company. I believe that these efforts
should continue as more and more companies become aware of their social and
environmental impact and take responsible action to improve their performance in these
areas.

To conclude, most companies should practice some form of corporate social and
environmental responsibility because of their benefits for them and social.

E4:
There are many elements which affect to our success and ethics is one of the most
essential ones. “Without revolutionary morality, talent is useless”, said Ho Chi Minh
president. So, companies that implement a management philosophy that relies heavily
on business ethics are supposed to be more successful than those that operate in an
unethical manner. I totally agree with this opinion and the essay will support my opinion.

First, an ethical business can boost employee morale in the workplace and lead to
greater productivity, which has an impact on how profitable the company can be.
Moreover, the ethics creates credibility and sympathy for customers. In addition, ethics
is a criteria which attracts investors, increases the value of company. For instance,
Vinamilk - a company produce milk in Viet Nam, is an ethical symbol, grow up
sustainably during decades because they engage in many charities, help those
difficulties, have good employee care

Unethical companies make some unfair competition. One of the biggest threats to any
business is its competitors. Some companies try to give themselves an unfair
advantage by attacking their competition through a few different types of unethical
business practices. Businesses use unethical practices that target customers, they hope
consumers will fail to notice they’re being tricked. They rely on the fact that they’ll be
able to make numerous sales without the word spreading that they’re being deceptive.
To conclude, an ethical business has more chances to be successful than an unethical
company does. Ethics give us more opportunities to improve ourselves, become better
version.
Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to
live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, global warming is a noticeable issue which receives a deal of media
attention around the world due to its effects on human life. Therefore, there are many
opinions about this and one of them is finding a way to live with it. I disagree with this
opinion and this essay will support my viewpoint.
We have a lot of solutions to prevent climate change instead of accepting to live with it.
Firstly, we should encourage people to use public transportations instead of private
vehicles. This would reduce in the amount of vehicle emissions. As a result, the amount
of carbon would be reduced, contributing less to global warming which is a part of
climate change. The way, which is being used by many countries, is “green tax” on car
drivers, airline companies.
Secondly, it is necessary to propagate and educate people about the awareness of
environmental protection. Especially, we should focus on educating the youth and the
children to protect the environment. Besides, campaigns should be supported and
expand more and more.
Whether instead of taking these acts we try to live with climate change, the sequel will
be serious. Imaging that if the amount of people is raising and the living areas are
decreasing by the rise in sea level, millions of people will be displaced by flooding.
Therefore, they have to migrate, lose their homes and jobs, … that lead to recession,
the rise in homelessness and poverty.
In conclusion, according to my opinion, we must try our best to limit and prevent climate
change instead of living with it. I hope that each of us will contribute to protect our
planet.
Climate change is a phenomenon that affects countries all over the world. Many people
strongly believe that it is the responsibility of individuals, rather than corporations and
governments, to deal with this problem.
To what extent do you agree?

In recent decades, global warming is a noticeable issue which receives a deal of media
attention around the world due to its effects on human life. Some suppose that it is the
responsibility of individuals, rather than corporations and governments, to deal with this
problem. I strongly disagree with this statement and this essay will support my opinion.
Despite the fact that individual citizens also contribute to climate change through the
effects of their actions, they cannot be fully made responsible for it since they lack the
power to make important systemic changes in the same way that the government and
businesses can. Because of the worldwide threat posed by climate change, only the
government can make necessary global changes. Individuals can only make a modest
impact by using public transit, buying products with fewer packaging, and recycling as
much as they can.
On the other hand, the government has the power to pass laws that puts limits on both
people and big businesses. Corporate laws are essential because they are the main
cause of climate change. The majority of the worldwide emissions are caused by a big
number of different companies. Reducing waste production and changing how
businesses handle their garbage are said to be effective ways to prevent climate
change. Additionally, the government might fund the production of alternative energy
sources like solar, wind, or waterpower.
To sum up, though individuals can play a role in combating climate change, the
government should shoulder the full responsibility by enacting policies to reduce
corporate and private waste.