Appendix C - Program Specification - BSCS
Appendix C - Program Specification - BSCS
General Stream
Holders of a Secondary School Certificate (SSC), General Stream (MOE), or equivalent, are eligible
for admission in the undergraduate programs if they satisfy the following requirements:
• The General School Certificate with a minimum average of 75% and
• EmSAT with a minimum score of 1100 on EmSAT English
• EmSAT with a minimum score of 600 on EmSAT Arabic
Admissions criteria for programs, and for the institution, are regularly evaluated and such
information is used in enrolment planning.
Program goals
The goals of the BSCS program are:
Graduates’ abilities to understand and apply principles of cyber security
Graduates’ competencies to engage in creating technological impact related to cyber
security
Graduates’ knowledge and skills to analyse cyber security problems in context of program
discipline
Program learning outcomes
PLO 1: Demonstrate comprehensive understanding of theories, concepts and principles in Cyber
Security.
PLO 2: Apply tools, techniques, legal, and ethical practices in solving-problems relating to Cyber
Security.
PLO3: Analyse complex organisation Cyber Security problems to propose effective solutions
derived from research outcomes.
PLO4: Examine, select, and design appropriate cyber security models to manage real-life contexts.
Program structure
Responsibility (AR)
Self-Development
Knowledge
Role in Context
Autonomy &
Skills
(RC)
(SD)
PLO1 Demonstrate comprehensive 7K3 7S1 7AR1 7RC3 7SD2
understanding of theories, concepts
and principles in Cyber Security.
PLO2 Apply tools, techniques, legal, and 7K1 7S2 7AR3 7RC1 7SD2
ethical practices in solving-problems
relating to Cyber Security.
PLO3 Analyse complex organisation Cyber 7K2 7S3 7AR4 7RC2 7SD3
Security problems to propose
effective solutions derived from
research outcomes.
PLO4 Examine, select, and design 7K4/ 7K5 7S4 7AR2 7RC4
appropriate cyber security models to
manage real-life contexts.
Assessment Plan
PL
Module
O PLO Assessment
code
No.
Analyse complex Cyber Introduction to Design/Implementation Plan
Security problems to Computer Security
Simulation report
propose effective solutions Secure Systems
Architecture Project/Research Report
1
Capstone Project Presentation
Others (please specify)
Mid Term & End of Term
Advance topics in
Cyber Security Analytics
Solve, design, and Data Communication Design/Implementation Plan
implement Cyber Security and computer
Networks Simulation report
solutions to emphasize Intrusion Detection
theoretical, technical, and Incident Analysis Project/Research Report
3 legal, and ethical values
Cyber Security Law Presentation
Others (please specify)
Mid Term & End of Term
Academic Advisors are assigned to students at the start of their program of study. This Advisor works
with the student throughout the time they attend the academy. The Advisor not only assists the student
with planning their studies at the Academy but also helps with career advice and mapping directions
for the student to achieve their personal and professional goals. The Advisor uses various tools to
achieve this including input from the student, the teaching staff, the student’s records, personal
experience, and contacts. Students are expected to consult with their assigned advisor on a regular
basis to ensure that they are on track to meet their goals and to receive any new information available
regarding their status.
Student Feedback
EAIC provides several opportunities for students to provide their feedback on teaching and quality of
facilities and services provided. The Student Survey is administered every term and students get to
complete the survey for every course that they have enrolled in. The purpose of this evaluation is to
assess the faculty, teaching methods, learning and physical facilities of the Academy.
The Graduate survey is administered at the end of the study program and the survey gathers data on
student perception of the overall quality of the Program and satisfaction level of students in regards to
their educational experience particularly in terms of their professional preparation.
In addition to the above, EAIC has a student council which includes student representatives from all
the program. The Council acts as the student voice and the council acts as a liaison between students
and the Academy. The Council gathers student suggestions and feedback on relevant matters and
submits it to the management for consideration. Another avenue for student council to provide
feedback is the program review process where key stakeholders such as the Student Council, and
alumni are invited to attend and provide feedback about the program subject to review. The review
process relies on all assessment data and results compiled over the previous years including the student
survey reports.
Below is a list of surveys that are conducted for all academy stakeholders during the academic
program:
Survey Stakeholder Schedule
New Student Engagement Survey New Students Beginning of first term
Student Faculty and Course
Students End of every term
Evaluation Survey
Student Satisfaction with Services
Students Every year
Survey
Student Exit Survey Students End of every term
Within 9 Months After
Graduates’ Employment Survey Graduates
Graduation
Faculty Course Evaluation Survey Faculty End of every term
Staff Satisfaction with Services
Staff Every year
Survey
Employer/Industry Satisfaction
Employers Every year
Survey
Alumni Satisfaction Survey Alumni Every year
Local Community Service Local
Every year
Satisfaction Survey Community
Quality and enhancement mechanisms
Course review reports by academic members teaching each course will drive the continuous
improvement of courses. Curriculum review by the Curriculum Committee will consider the course
review reports in addition to assessment data and other direct and indirect measures of quality. The
program also undergoes a comprehensive program review once in five years.
Indicators of standard and quality