1 PB
1 PB
1 PB
Corresponding Author:
Nurly Meilinda
Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sriwijaya
Street Raya Palembang-Prabumulih Km. 32 Indralaya, Palembang, South Sumatera 30662, Indonesia
Email: nurlymeilinda@unsri.ac.id
1. INTRODUCTION
For the education sector, the COVID-19 pandemic is a momentum to introduce and carry out major
reforms [1]. This is the impact of school closures, thus, the main task of educating children is no longer
wholly (or most of it) the responsibility of the school and now returns to the parents [2]. Due to developments
in the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increasing trend toward online learning as schools have been
forced to close their doors for an unspecified period as the only option available [3]. Consequently, it is the
time to fundamentally rethink, reform, and reinvent the education system in response to the extraordinary
demands of the current state of affairs.
In the COVID-19 pandemic situation, other countries implemented different education policies to
manage the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak while ensuring the achievement of important government goals in
the education sector. This was conducted by considering the severity of the COVID-19 case. In this context,
Indonesia has varied lockdown policies that are different from other countries. This started with Large-Scale
Social Restrictions and the Imposition of Restrictions toward Community Activities with various variations
[4]. The public discourse on learning in the era of COVID-19 that has emerged on Twitter and other social
media provides important insights into public concerns about and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and
the policies governments are taking to address it [5]. However, the recognition that the public discourse
around learning in the COVID-19 era is multifaceted and evolving raises analytical and ontological
challenges. Studies on this topic usually use a text-extracting approach to analyze responses to major events.
They usually treat public discourse on social media as a single unit and ignore the possibility that such
discourse may have multiple facets [6].
Scholars have used data sourced from big data on a large scale. Therefore, there is knowledge on
discourse in the COVID-19 pandemic situation including public discourse on education in the COVID-19 era
[7]–[9]. It is clear that from these studies, the public discourse about the pandemic emerging on Twitter and
other social media platforms consists of a series of topics that are directly or indirectly related to COVID-19.
Meanwhile, a data-driven text mining approach to social media discourse adds a valuable tool to annotate and
analyze sentiment toward education policies in the COVID-19 situation (Sentiment Analysis), and to identify
specific topics (or sub-discourses) (Topic modeling) that arise due to online schools [10]–[13]. So far, they
have failed to take into account the fact that COVID-19 discourse always consists of various thematically
coherent sub-discourses that evolve and change substantially in real time (i.e., without data periodization).
This study employs Silverstone’s domestication theory to examine the evolution of COVID-19
discourse in the Indonesian education sector as reflected in the Twittersphere [14]. This theory posits that the
integration of technology into social and cultural norms is influenced by a variety of factors, suggesting that
individuals acclimatize to and appropriate new technologies in accordance with these norms. It provides a
framework for understanding how Indonesians adopt and integrate online learning technologies in the context
of the COVID-19 pandemic. The domestication process of online learning in the Indonesian Twittersphere
can be illuminated by analyzing users’ engagement with these technologies and how they incorporate them
into their daily lives. This approach surpasses the methodologies employed by previous researchers and
provides nuanced insights into the complexities of the domestication process within the Indonesian context.
This information could inform policy reforms and cast light on the use of online learning technologies during
the pandemic. In addition, this research contributes to the ongoing development of the domestication theory
by investigating cultural differences and their impact on the technological adoption process.
The study of technological domestication falls between media studies and sociology, which refers to
the social construction of technology through its practical use [15]. Technology typically seen as a material
object in contrast to social relation, domestication offers a different perspective that emphasize technology as
social [16]. The domestication theory assumes that users actively participate in creating usage patterns and
meaning in their interaction with technology. New technologies frequently amplify social divides that already
in place. Inequalities like access to social, economic, and symbolic resources can sometimes have an effect
on how successful the domestication is. While social, economic, and cultural resources have been
shown to affect people understanding, it is important to remember that resources can be both material and
symbolic and consider how people approach specific technologies and whether or not they begin to
domesticate them [14].
The idea of domestication is an extension of theory that established the significance of thoughts,
questions, acts, and feelings in the dynamics of a technological society [14]. This notion holds that domestic
technology users have opinions, albeit they keep them to themselves, and engage in behaviors that affect the
development of an information society. Domestication of technology is used to seek the power of the
powerless, even though in reality they don’t win. One of the most significant historical benefits is how it
transforms public and private spaces such as how modern cell phones instantly create a personal environment
surrounding the user.
In relation to the historical case of online schools, this study applies domestication theory to analyze
technology users, in this case social media users, who treat digital space as both a private and a public sphere
where they feel free to express their opinions and receive support from other social media users in the
pandemic era. This particular scenario is intriguing since it involves the process of technology adoption
relating to online school, which is a challenge for parents who experience it, then this concern is
subsequently manifested in the form of uploads on social media. Domestication theory provides a framework
to understand the complexity and dynamic relationship between users and what they are doing in their social
media account.
2. RESEARCH METHOD
This study uses a constructivist paradigm with a qualitative research approach and analyzes social
media texts to understand and to find the meaning behind the contents of the text using theoretical tools.
Qualitative research uses a variety of empirical materials from case studies and personal experiences to
cultural texts and the production of text that have personal significance [17]. Moreover, this study uses
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822 1323
corpus linguistics as a methodological tool and technology domestication theory as a theoretical tool to
systematically analyze and gain deeper insights into social media texts especially in online school discourse.
The use and presentation of social media data in research is a subject that remains controversial
[23]. According to Twitter’s privacy policy, public content, including tweets, is available for research
purposes, but there is still uncertainty around the topic. To address this, we have anonymized the tweets used
in this paper. Despite Twitter providing a valuable source of data on public usage and perspectives, it is still a
challenging process [24]. Moreover, Twitter's user base tends to be skewed toward younger demographics
and English speakers.
Domestication theory in action: Indonesian Twitter corpus analysis during … (Nurly Meilinda)
1324 ISSN: 2252-8822
order to have a better understanding of how the search terms were used within the corpus. The results of the
analysis were then utilized to deduce how the intended subject matter was represented in the corpus, which is
a crucial step in establishing a full and accurate corpus-based analysis.
3.1. A frequent word from restrictions toward community activities (PPKM) transition level 1-4
The transition period in this research was from March 2 to April 2, 2022. This period was the first
time that COVID-19 was confirmed in Indonesia until the day the government took action to implement a
partial lockdown on April 3, 2020. During this condition, most schools still implemented face-to-face
learning because the Indonesian government had not given any instructions. Some schools were starting
online learning and blended learning. This can be seen from the appearance of words such as “masuk (new
academic year)”, “daring (online)”, “online”, and “blended”. These findings showed a variety of policies
taken by schools, starting online, and offline and some were implementing blended learning. Besides, other
words that emerged in this period were hardware such as laptops and mobile phones as online learning
media. We also found two applications from Google to support online learning, namely Google Classroom
and Google Meet. Words related to the Islamic religion such as bismillah, innalillahi and ikhtiar were also
found in this period. “Bismillah” is a word commonly used to start an activity while “innalillahi” is a word
used when Muslims encounter a disaster such as COVID-19. It cannot be denied that in several studies the
resilience of a community in a disaster was determined by the religiousness of the community. By drawing
closer to God, religious people will feel calm and strong in facing disasters. Figure 1 provide an overview of
the most frequent words that appear during the transition period.
Large-scale social restrictions (PSBB) was the initial policy taken by the Indonesian government to
control the spread of COVID-19. In this period, the learning and teaching process was fully carried out
online. Students learned from home and also teachers taught from home. Schools implemented this policy
slowly. In the early days, several schools were still found to be conducting face-to-face learning. It was found
mainly in Eastern Indonesia. The findings of the words “dukungan (support)”, “mahal (expensive)”, “ujian
(task)”, “SPP (tuition fee)”, and “pelajaran (subject)” indicated that there had been a request for support
from various parties, especially the government, to carry out internet quota subsidies. Students during this
period were still required to pay tuition fees. Thus, there were tweets about tuition fees that were intended to
question the accountability of the tuition fees which should be used to subsidize quotas. Online learning was
also found to be expensive because students had to have hardware and software to fully access this learning
method. During the PSBB period, we found Teams and Zoom as applications that supported online learning
in the form of video conferencing applications. Moreover, there was the word e-learning which indicates that
schools were already using e-learning which was facilitated by the relevant government agencies. Issues of
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822 1325
the digital divide were also found in this period, especially by finding the words “sinyal (signal)” and
“keterbatasan (limitation)”. Besides, we found words that represent burnout issues, namely overload, and
lelah (tired). Figure 2 present a visual representation of the most frequently used words during the PSBB.
Emergency PPKM is a more serious policy and led to a full lockdown. During this period, several
issues that emerged were restriction zones through words such as “lockdown”, “rumah (home)”, and
“membantu (to help)”. At this time, students were fully learning from home. Some students also complained
that they were asked to help with family tasks at home. Furthermore, another issue was the digital divide with
words such as “miskin (poor)”, “lemot (bad network)”, “hilang (signal lost)”, and “gaptek (technologically
backward)”. Then the burnout expressions of the students were also found from the appearance of swear
words and other complaints such as dizziness. The last was the use of religious words such as suhanallah,
masyaallah and prayer. Following the description of the issues, Figure 3 serve as a comprehensive visual
summary to see a clear overview of the dominant topics and word during emergency PPKM.
Finally, PPKM levels 1-4 was a policy for classifying the severity of COVID-19 transmission,
where level 4 was the most severe level, and level 1 was the least severe level. The findings showed that the
issues were not much different from those in the previous period, namely restriction zones, stress and
burnout, the digital divide, and religious pity. They were also found in this period with different language
usage variations. During this period, there were many swear words that were found to be significant
compared to other words as an expression of burnout from students. The digital divide in this period was
Domestication theory in action: Indonesian Twitter corpus analysis during … (Nurly Meilinda)
1326 ISSN: 2252-8822
found with expressions such as networking and disruption. Words related to the Islamic religion, such as Ya
Allah, astagfirullah, and aamin were also found to be significant in this period. Figure 4 show frequent words
during PPKM level 1-4, it provides a visual representation and facilitating an understanding about the
language that used during these periods.
Domestication theory has been widely used in media and technology studies to understand the
complex relationship between technology and society. According to Silverstone [14], the domestication of
technologies is not a simple process of introducing a new tool or gadget into an existing context, but a
complex interplay between technology and social and cultural practices. The process of domestication
involves both the appropriation of technologies by users and the adaptation of technologies to suit the needs
and routines of users in their daily lives. The findings of this research are consistent with the domestication
theory and suggest that the integration of technology into daily routines, such as online learning during the
COVID-19 pandemic, is a process that is influenced by various social and cultural factors. The emergence of
certain words related to hardware and software in the Indonesian Twittersphere during the transition period
suggests that the domestication of technology for online learning was still in progress. The finding of
hardware-related words like laptops and mobile phones, for instance, indicates that some students were still
acquiring the necessary equipment to fully access online learning.
Moreover, during the PSBB period, the findings showed that there were challenges related to the
digital divide, such as bad network connections and limited access to technology, which impeded the
domestication process [26]. This finding highlights the importance of considering the social and cultural
context in which technology is used and the role of socio-economic factors in shaping the domestication
process. The request for internet quota subsidies and the questioning of tuition fees accountability during this
period also indicates the importance of government support in facilitating the domestication of technology for
online learning. Furthermore, the findings also suggest that the domestication process is not uniform and can
be influenced by various contextual factors, such as policies implemented by the government. For instance,
during the emergency PPKM period, the domestication process faced new challenges, such as the need for
students to help with family tasks at home and the disruption of networking, which were not present in the
previous periods. This finding emphasizes the need for a continuous assessment of the domestication process
as it is influenced by various contextual factors.
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822 1327
approach to identifying data patterns to better achieve research objectives. From the results of the linguistic
corpus, we then carried out a thematic analysis. In this research, the thematic analysis aimed to analyze
narrative material through the process of tokenizing and splitting the text into relatively small individual
content units as a descriptive result. Thematic analysis was also used to identify, analyze and report data
patterns. These two techniques allowed us to identify and examine common themes, topics, and patterns in a
data set. The six themes found in this research were analyzed critically and manually based on the research
objective to avoid topic allocation errors. The six themes were determined based on literature review, word
frequency, and relevance to the most prominent terms. In addition, Figure 5 illustrating keyword analysis in
the distance learning system category and provide a visual depiction of the most significant terms related to
this issue.
The distance learning system is a response to changing learning modes from face-to-face learning to
online learning. The words that appear on this theme increased, especially in the initial period of
implementing the online learning model which was implemented by the Indonesian government in March
2020 to comply with the large-scale social restrictions regulations previously stipulated in Government
Regulation number 21 of 2020. In this period, the community affected by the online learning model had just
started the learning phase using online learning tools, and digital technology tools, and had just been
introduced to several new terms in online learning, such as “blended” learning, “online school”, and “online
learning”. Educational institutions including students and parents still have to adapt to teaching and learning
methods in overcoming the challenges faced by COVID-19 [27], not only in Indonesia but also in many other
countries which are starting to adapt to various methods [28]. Therefore, in the early period of this transition
period, the community is still in a phase where they cannot fully accept the changes brought about by
COVID-19, which can be seen from the appearance of words, such as “mahal (expensive)”, “SPP (tuition
fee)”, “Masuk (go to school)”, “wisuda (graduation)”, and “Ujian (exam)” which still showed the relationship
between internet users and the pre-pandemic period where these words are keywords that often appear during
face-to-face learning in the normal era.
The findings presented in this passage highlight the impact of COVID-19 on the education sector,
specifically in the shift from face-to-face learning to online learning. The increased usage of words related to
distance learning during the initial period of implementing the online learning model in Indonesia in March
2020 indicates the difficulty faced by the community in adjusting to this new mode of learning. This
highlights the importance of understanding the social and cultural context in which technology is used, as
suggested by the domestication theory [14].
Previous research has also emphasized the challenges faced by the education sector in adapting to
online learning during the pandemic, not just in Indonesia but globally. Previous researches [27], [29] have
all discussed the challenges of distance learning in Indonesia, while other researches [30], [31] have also
highlighted similar challenges in other countries. These challenges include adapting to new teaching and
learning methods and tools, as well as the financial burden of accessing online learning platforms. The
appearance of words related to face-to-face learning, such as “masuk (go to school)”, “wisuda (graduation)”,
and “ujian (exam)” alongside the emergence of words related to distance learning indicates the difficulty in
fully accepting the changes brought about by COVID-19. This highlights the need for further research to
understand the challenges and opportunities presented by online learning in the context of the pandemic, as
Domestication theory in action: Indonesian Twitter corpus analysis during … (Nurly Meilinda)
1328 ISSN: 2252-8822
well as the impact on the education sector in the long run. To provide a more visual representation of the
keyword analysis within the digital support category, Figure 6 offers an illustrative overview of the most
prominent keywords emerged in this topic.
Digital support is a voice about the need for various kinds of software and hardware as a
consequence of online learning. This research found words such as “handphone”, “laptop”, and “computer”
that represent sounds related to the hardware used in distance learning. Meanwhile, words such as “Teams”,
“Elearning”, “Gclassroom”, “zoom”, and “Gmeet” appeared quite a lot and represented software or
applications used during the online teaching and learning process during the pandemic. One of the words that
often appeared was “minus”. This word was related to the impact that appeared on the body and affected
students due to online learning. This second theme emerged during the intensive period of technology
adoption and the integration of technology in schools and preschools [32]. The dominant words used by
netizens showed the process of acceptance of new learning models for students and teachers at school,
especially concerning all hardware, and software and their impact on their daily lives. The words that appear
in this theme were very important in online school discourse given the skills to use technical tools are needed
to carry out a smooth transition to the learning process in schools after the spread of COVID-19 [33]–[35].
The urge to share on social media their experiences in implementing online learning is also a manifestation of
their desire to seek support and common ground with others in facing the challenges of transitioning to home
education, given that most schools make this transition with little preparation and very badly executed [36].
The second theme that emerged in this research is digital support, which emphasizes the need for
software and hardware to support online learning. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of
digital technology in education, leading to an increased demand for technology tools to facilitate distance
learning. The findings of this research highlight the importance of hardware such as handphones, laptops, and
computers, as well as software such as Teams, Elearning, Google Classroom, Zoom, and Google Meet, in
facilitating online teaching and learning during the pandemic. However, the negative impact of technology on
students is also highlighted, as evidenced by the frequent appearance of the word “minus”, which represents
the negative effects of online learning on students' physical and mental health. This theme is in line with the
dimension of “appropriation” in the domestication theory, which refers to the process of incorporating
technology into daily routines and making it a part of everyday life. The findings suggest that the adoption of
digital technology in education is still in the process of appropriation, as students and teachers are still
adapting to the new learning models and the impact of technology on their daily lives. Therefore, it is
important for schools to provide adequate support and training to students and teachers to ensure a smooth
transition to online learning. Previous research has also emphasized the importance of digital technology in
facilitating online learning during the pandemic. For example, a study by Boothby et al. [35] found that
digital technology tools such as video conferencing and online learning platforms have played a crucial role
in maintaining continuity of education during the pandemic. Similarly, Jiang et al. [37] emphasized the need
for schools to provide students with appropriate hardware and software to facilitate online learning and
ensure educational equity during the pandemic. Figure 7 illustrating the outcome of keyword analysis within
the restriction zones category to provide a visual snapshot of the key terms related to this category.
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822 1329
Restriction zones is a netizen’s response to the implementation of a changing lockdown policy with
all the consequences for the learning process. Comments from netizens that appear in this theme were related
to rules made during COVID-19 and influencing learning models, as well as discussions about what they
think about these rules and policies. It can be seen from the words “zona (zone)”, “edaran (letter)”,
“himbauan (direction)”, and “lockdown” related to the narrative used by the government of the Republic of
Indonesia in conveying regulations related to COVID-19. The words that also appeared on this theme, such
as “penularan (infection)”, “bahaya (danger)”, “rumah (home)”, “membantu (to help)”, “tolong (need help)”,
“penutupan (closing)” were responses presented in society related to the implementation of these government
regulations. The challenge in switching to online learning was the burden on parents, as previously, the
children were under the supervision of school personnel inside the school building [38]. Therefore, the effect
of the emergence of policies and regulations that require social restrictions, especially in educational
institutions, would have an impact on the emergence of a dilemma in netizens who were burdened by the
existence of an online learning model. In Addition, they were burdened with worries about the health of their
children if they continue to carry out face to face learning, this can be seen from the use of the words
“bahaya (danger)”, “tolong (need help)”, and “penularan (infection)”.
The Restriction Zones theme can be analyzed through the lens of the domestication theory,
particularly the dimension of appropriation. According to this dimension, the integration of technology into
daily life requires a process of adaptation and negotiation between technology and users, as well as between
users themselves. In this case, netizens are negotiating the impact of government policies and regulations on
their daily lives, particularly on the learning process. The use of social media to express their opinions and
concerns about these policies is an example of the appropriation of technology to support their needs and
interests. Previous research on the domestication theory in the context of online learning during the pandemic
has shown similar findings. For instance, a study found that the domestication of online learning involved a
process of negotiation and adaptation between students, parents, and teachers to ensure a smooth transition to
this new mode of learning [39]. Another study found that the domestication of technology involved the
development of new digital skills and competencies among students, teachers, and parents, as well as the
adaptation of social norms and practices related to learning and education [40]. The fourth theme that
emerged in this study is stress and burnout, Figure 8 displays the keyword analysis of this theme.
Domestication theory in action: Indonesian Twitter corpus analysis during … (Nurly Meilinda)
1330 ISSN: 2252-8822
Stress and burnout are expressions of online learning fatigue. Previous studies related to online
learning showed that parents tended to reject online learning during a pandemic due to several reasons such
as a lack of online learning resources, inadequate self-regulation of children, and lack of time and
professionalism of parents in supporting children’s online learning, not to mention the difficulties caused by
the COVID-19 pandemic which had made them suffered. Thus, they preferred to reject the online learning
model [41]. In line with previous studies, this study found that parents tended to have high levels of stress
and frustration when adapting to this new learning model characterized by the use of the words “pusing
(dizzy)”, “tugas (task)”, “overload”, “lelah (tired)”, and “begadang (stay up late)”. In addition, the dominant
words also led to an outpouring of frustration with the online learning model that was being implemented. It
can be seen from the many 'cursed' words that appeared on social media, especially in online learning topics,
such as “babi (pig/cursing)”, “anjrit (cursing)”, “bangsat (cursing)”, and “bodoh (stupid)”. Interactions that
occur on social media sites vary greatly and were influenced by various factors such as personality and
anonymity factors. Besides, the use of social media was also believed to strengthen online acceptance and
support from other users [42]. Concerning this theme, the words that appear in this theme can also be seen as
an attempt to channel emotions and seek support from others regarding the online learning problems they
face.
The theme of stress and burnout during online learning can be analyzed through the lens of
domestication theory, particularly the dimension of appropriation. This dimension deals with how users adapt
and take ownership of technology in their daily lives. In the context of online learning during the COVID-19
pandemic, stress and burnout can be seen as a consequence of the appropriation of digital technology tools
for the learning process. The use of curse words and other expressions of frustration can be seen as a form of
resistance and negotiation of power between users and technology, as they struggle to adapt to this new
learning model. Previous research has also shown that stress and burnout are common experiences during
online learning, particularly for parents who are expected to support their children's learning at home. Arora
and Srinivasan [43] found that parents experienced high levels of stress and anxiety due to the added
responsibility of supporting their children's learning while also dealing with their own work and household
duties. Similarly, Murphy [41] found that parents reported feeling overwhelmed and frustrated by the
demands of online learning, particularly the lack of structure and guidance compared to traditional face-to-
face learning. In the forthcoming part, will be explained the digital divide category as the fifth theme that
emerged in this study. Figure 9 showcases the outcome of the keyword analysis in the digital divide category.
Digital divide was a response to the inequality in information and communication technology
infrastructure development in Indonesia. This research found that the online learning process was inseparable
from the problem of the digital divide as reflected in the emergence of keywords such as “gaptek
(technologically backward)”, “miskin (poor)”, and “cicilan (installment)” which indicated the difficulty of
netizens in meeting online learning needs in terms of learning facilities and infrastructure. This was
supported by research from UNICEF [44] that in Southeast Asia, there were at least 147 million children or
38% of all students could not access remote learning. In addition, keywords such as “lemot (bad signal)”,
“sinyal (signal)”, “hilang (network lost)”, “gangguan (network interference)”, and “jaringan (network)” also
appeared in online learning discourse on social media. This showed that this digital divide arose not only
because of social class [45] but also by demographic factors where access to online learning facilities also
differed between students who lived in urban areas and rural areas. This was supported by previous studies
which found that colleagues in various countries had raised concerns about equality among students because
not all students had the opportunity to access resources and engage in online education [46].
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822 1331
The digital divide theme can be analyzed using the domestication theory. The emergence of
keywords, such as “gaptek” and “miskin” reflects the process of domestication, where the technology is being
adopted and integrated into daily routines. However, the difficulties faced by netizens in meeting the online
learning needs indicate that the technology is not fully domesticated and is still in the process of becoming
part of their daily routines. The lack of access to online learning facilities and infrastructure can also be seen
as a form of resistance to technology domestication, as some netizens are excluded from the benefits of
technology due to their socioeconomic status or geographic location. Previous research has also highlighted
the issue of the digital divide in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. A study found that the lack
of access to technology and internet connectivity was a major obstacle to online learning in developing
countries [47]. Subsequently, the research shows that there is another theme emerging related to the religious
piety. Figure 10 present the result of keyword analysis in this category.
As a religious community, religious piety was found in many tweets. This theme was indeed very
possible to emerge, especially when considering the significant increase in religious practice in countries
with a Muslim majority population which was marked by the increasing number of Islamic religious
organizations, religious films, and soap operas, musicians, online and printed media selling religious content
[48]. This research showed that something linear could be seen from the keywords that appear in this theme,
namely the expression of various kinds of emotions. It was not uncommon to use Arabic which was often
used casually by Muslims in their daily lives. The choice of words and the language used seemed to be
divided into several objectives, for example, the aim was to convey a sense of optimism and gratitude, for
example, “bismillah”, “alhamdulillah”, “subhanallah”, “ya Allah” and “masya allah”. While some of the
words represented or were a reaction to a negative situation, such as the words “innalilahi” and
“astagfirullah”. As well as some others indicated the activities, they carry out such as “prayer”, “amen” and
“endeavor”. Digital technologies had changed, expanded, and adapted religious practices [49]. Based on
previous studies, the emergence of religious keywords was quite common because it was a way for netizens
to expand the medium in practicing their religion and beliefs and to show identity as Muslims who always
remember God in every situation, especially in a disaster situation [49].
The theme of religious piety can be analyzed using the domestication theory, which states that
technology is not neutral, and its adoption and use are influenced by social, cultural, and institutional factors.
In the context of religious piety, it can be argued that the domestication of technology has enabled Muslims
to express their religious identity and beliefs in the online world. Through social media, Muslims can
negotiate their religious feelings and reconstruct their identities, as noted in previous research [48].
Moreover, the use of Arabic words in social media posts reflects the incorporation of technology into daily
religious practices, indicating the complex interplay between technology and the social and cultural contexts
in which it is used. The use of Arabic words and expressions, such as “bismillah,” “alhamdulillah,” and
“subhanallah,” demonstrates how digital technologies have changed and expanded religious practices, as
noted in previous research [49].
4. CONCLUSION
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, distance learning has altered the educational landscape. However,
educational and societal issues accompanied the implementation of this technology, especially in nations with
diverse ICT infrastructure. This phenomenon is partially explained by the theoretical approach to technology
domestication, which views technology as an object that is adopted and modified to satisfy users’ desires and
preferences in their cultural and social environment. However, the COVID-19 pandemic’s sudden and
Domestication theory in action: Indonesian Twitter corpus analysis during … (Nurly Meilinda)
1332 ISSN: 2252-8822
massive shift to online learning has disrupted the education sector's domestication of this technology, thereby
introducing new obstacles. This dilemma faces educational institutions that are unprepared. Inadequate
infrastructure and regulations impede online learning. The digital divide and inadequate telecommunications
network infrastructure also hinder the ability of diverse pupils to comprehend and benefit from online
education. The effects are not only pedagogical but also psychological, as evidenced by student complaints
and tension during this transitional period. These results shed light on the challenges and potential of online
education in countries with diverse ICT infrastructures in academic research. This study also emphasizes the
significance of social and cultural factors in comprehending and promoting the domestication of technology.
This study has numerous practical applications. First, policymakers and educators must become
more aware of and address issues related to students’ online learning, particularly in light of the digital
divide. Second, it is crucial to identify and manage the psychological effects of online learning on students,
particularly burnout and stress. According to this study, religious institutions assist students in difficult
circumstances. This study has some limitations. Twitter and the transition of an epidemic may limit
conclusions. Consequently, future research may employ additional social media and longitudinal analyses to
monitor changes in online learning attitudes and behaviors. Post-pandemic circumstances will also present
new challenges and dynamics for the domestication of online learning technologies.
REFERENCES
[1] P. M. Ross, E. Scanes, P. Poronnik, H. Coates, and W. Locke, “Understanding STEM academics’ responses and resilience to
educational reform of academic roles in higher education,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 11, Jan.
2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00327-1.
[2] A. Ożadowicz, “Modified Blended Learning in Engineering Higher Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown—Building
Automation Courses Case Study,” Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 292, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10100292.
[3] S. Tejedor, L. Cervi, A. Pérez-Escoda, and F. T. Jumbo, “Digital Literacy and Higher Education during COVID-19 Lockdown:
Spain, Italy, and Ecuador,” Publications, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 48, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/publications8040048.
[4] R. Djalante et al., “Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020,”
Progress in Disaster Science, vol. 6, p. 100091, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100091.
[5] A. Ojo, S. C. Guntuku, M. Zheng, R. S. Beidas, and M. L. Ranney, “How Health Care Workers Wield Influence Through Twitter
Hashtags: Retrospective Cross-sectional Study of the Gun Violence and COVID-19 Public Health Crises,” JMIR Public Health
and Surveillance, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e24562, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.2196/24562.
[6] X. Xiang et al., “Modern Senicide in the Face of a Pandemic: An Examination of Public Discourse and Sentiment About Older
Adults and COVID-19 Using Machine Learning,” The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. e190–e200, Mar.
2021, doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa128.
[7] M. Schweinberger, M. Haugh, and S. Hames, “Analysing discourse around COVID-19 in the Australian Twittersphere: A real-
time corpus-based analysis,” Big Data & Society, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/20539517211021437.
[8] J.-D. Bacsu et al., “Using Twitter to Examine Stigma Against People with Dementia During COVID-19: Infodemiology Study,”
JMIR Aging, vol. 5, no. 1, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.2196/35677.
[9] M. Massaro et al., “Non-pharmaceutical Interventions and the Infodemic on Twitter: Lessons Learned from Italy during the
Covid-19 Pandemic,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01726-7.
[10] I. Redstone and J. Villasenor, Unassailable ideas: How unwritten rules and social media shape discourse in American higher
education. USA: Oxford University Press, 2020, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190078065.001.0001.
[11] K. G. Byrnes, P. A. Kiely, C. P. Dunne, K. W. McDermott, and J. C. Coffey, “Communication, collaboration and contagion:
‘Virtualisation’ of anatomy during COVID‐19,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 82–89, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/ca.23649.
[12] K. Kele and P. Mzileni, “Higher education leadership responses applied in two South African comprehensive universities during
the COVID-19 pandemic: A critical discourse analysis,” Transformation in Higher Education, vol. 6, Jul. 2021, doi:
10.4102/the.v6i0.114.
[13] C. Greenhow, K. B. S. Willet, and S. Galvin, “Inquiring tweets want to know: #Edchat supports for #RemoteTeaching during
COVID-19,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1434–1454,, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13097.
[14] R. Silverstone, “Domesticating domestication: Reflections on the life of a concept,” in Domestication of media and technology,
Open University Press, 2006, pp. 229–248.
[15] S. A. Harwood, “The domestication of online technologies by smaller businesses and the ‘busy day,’” Information and
Organization, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 84–106, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.002.
[16] Y. Wang, “Parent–child role reversal in ICT domestication: media brokering activities and emotional labours of Chinese ‘study
mothers’ in Singapore,” Journal of Children and Media, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 267–284, Jul. 2020, doi:
10.1080/17482798.2020.1725900.
[17] C. Paltved and P. Musaeus, “Qualitative Research on Emergency Medicine Physicians: A Literature Review,” International
Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 03, no. 07, pp. 772–789, 2012, doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2012.37A136.
[18] W. Cheng, “Corpus‐Based Linguistic Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis,” in The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2012, pp. 1353–1360, doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0262.
[19] B. Kusumasari, R. Rajiyem, and A. D. Santoso, “Corpus-assisted Discourse Study (CADS) Method,” in Big Data for Social
Science: Between Methods and Social Reality, N. Kurnia and A. Savirani, Eds., Yogyakarta: UGM Press (in Indonesian), 2020,
pp. 155–171.
[20] L. Anthony, “AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software].” Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, 2019. [Online]. Available:
https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software (accessed: Aug. 12, 2020).
[21] P. Baker, C. Gabrielatos, M. KhosraviNik, M. Krzyżanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak, “A useful methodological synergy?
Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK
press,” Discourse & Society, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 273–306, May 2008, doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962.
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822 1333
[22] P. Baker and E. Levon, “Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about
masculinity,” Discourse & Communication, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 221–236, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1750481314568542.
[23] M. A. Moreno, N. Goniu, P. S. Moreno, and D. Diekema, “Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical
Considerations,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 708–713, Sep. 2013, doi:
10.1089/cyber.2012.0334.
[24] J. Mahoney, K. Le Louvier, S. Lawson, D. Bertel, and E. Ambrosetti, “Ethical considerations in social media analytics in the
context of migration: lessons learned from a Horizon 2020 project,” Research Ethics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 226–240, Jul. 2022, doi:
10.1177/17470161221087542.
[25] P. Baker and T. McEnery, “A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts,”
Journal of Language and Politics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 197–226, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak.
[26] I. K. Sørenssen and J. M. Bergschöld, “Domesticated Smartphones in Early Childhood Education and Care settings. Blurring the
lines between pedagogical and administrative use,” International Journal of Early Years Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 874–887,
Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/09669760.2021.1893157.
[27] M. D. Husni Rahiem, “Indonesian University Students’ Likes and Dislikes about Emergency Remote Learning during the
COVID-19 Pandemic,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v17i1.11525.
[28] S. M. Indrawati and A. Kuncoro, “Improving Competitiveness Through Vocational and Higher Education: Indonesia’s Vision for
Human Capital Development In 2019–2024,” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 29–59, Jan. 2021, doi:
10.1080/00074918.2021.1909692.
[29] D. S. Aditya, “Embarking digital learning due to COVID-19: Are teachers ready?” Journal of Technology and Science Education,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 104–116, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1109.
[30] R. Firmansyah, D. M. Putri, M. G. S. Wicaksono, S. F. Putri, A. A. Widianto, and M. R. Palil, “Educational Transformation: An
Evaluation of Online Learning Due To COVID-19,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 16,
no. 07, pp. 61–76, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i07.21201.
[31] M. Mulyani, F. Fidyati, S. Suryani, M. Suri, and H. Halimatussakdiah, “University students’ perceptions through e-learning
implementation during COVID-19 pandemic: Positive or negative features dominate?” Studies in English Language and
Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 197–211, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.24815/siele.v8i1.17628.
[32] M. Genç and E. Uçak, “The way teacher roles preferred by science teachers reflect on the lessons they teach in terms of their
discourse: COVID-19 vaccine,” Research in Science & Technological Education, pp. 1–24, Aug. 2022, doi:
10.1080/02635143.2022.2116420.
[33] M. A. Adarkwah, “‘I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?’: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19,” Education and
Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1665–1685, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z.
[34] Purwadi et al., “Student Perceptions of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: A Study of
Phenomenology,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1515–1528, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.12973/eu-
jer.10.3.1515.
[35] D. N. Boothby, A. Hart, H. Chandler, and D. Dupuy, “Leveraging community-based innovations during COVID-19 to strengthen
the Haitian school system,” Perspectives in Education, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 277–290, 2021, doi: 10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.17.
[36] M. Cordova et al., “COVID-19 and higher education: responding to local demands and the consolidation of e-internationalization
in Latin American universities,” Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 493–509, Oct. 2021,
doi: 10.1108/ARLA-01-2021-0020.
[37] N. Jiang, S. Yan-Li, K. Pamanee, and J. Sriyanto, “Depression, Anxiety, and Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic:
Comparison Among Higher Education Students in Four Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region,” Journal of Population and Social
Studies, vol. 29, pp. 370–383, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.25133/JPSSv292021.023.
[38] A. Querido et al., “Psychological impacts of the covid-19 pandemic among Portuguese and Swiss higher-education students:
Protocol for a mixed methods study,” JMIR Research Protocols, vol. 10, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.2196/28757.
[39] G. E. Morales-Martinez, E. O. Lopez-Ramirez, J. P. Garcia-Duran, and M. E. Urdiales-Ibarra, “Cognitive constructive –
Chronometric techniques as a tool for the e-assessment of learning,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and
Educational Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 159–176, 2018, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.17.2.10.
[40] T. Hargreaves, C. Wilson, and R. Hauxwell-Baldwin, “Building Research & Information Learning to live in a smart home
Learning to live in a smart home,” Building Research & Information, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 127–139, 2018
[41] M. P. A. Murphy, “COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-
pandemic pedagogy,” Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 492–505, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749.
[42] Tetep, “Social Capital and Digital Media Literacy Transformation from The Perspective of Social Science in The Era of Covid-19
Pandemic,” Review of International Geographical Education Online, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1186–1197, 2021, doi:
10.33403/rigeo.800561.
[43] A. K. Arora and R. Srinivasan, “Impact of pandemic covid-19 on the teaching – learning process: A study of higher education
teachers,” Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 43–56, 2020, doi: 10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825.
[44] UNICEF, “Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: What you should know,” UNICEF Indonesia, 2020. [Online]. Available:
https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/coronavirus (accessed: Apr. 27, 2020).
[45] M. Krishnaswami, L. S. Iyer, C. John, and M. Devanathan, “Countering educational disruptions through an inclusive approach:
Bridging the digital divide in distance education,” in Socioeconomic Inclusion During an Era of Online Education, IGI Global,
2022, pp. 204–224, doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4364-4.ch010.
[46] J. C. Sipior, B. T. Ward, and R. Connolly, “The digital divide and t-government in the United States: using the technology
acceptance model to understand usage,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 308–328, May 2011, doi:
10.1057/ejis.2010.64.
[47] T. Shyam and S. C. Das, “Impact of Covid-19 on education scenario and digital divide in India,” Eurasian Chemical
Communications, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 700–705, 2021, doi: 10.22034/ecc.2021.294584.1201.
[48] R. Kanozia and R. Arya, “‘Fake news’, religion, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh,” Media
Asia, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 313–321, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01296612.2021.1921963.
[49] N. Nurhayati and T. B. Purnama, “Funeral Processes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perceptions Among Islamic Religious
Leaders in Indonesia,” Journal of Religion and Health, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 3418–3433, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01418-z.
Domestication theory in action: Indonesian Twitter corpus analysis during … (Nurly Meilinda)
1334 ISSN: 2252-8822
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 3, June 2024: 1321-1334