Annexes REDI
Annexes REDI
Annexes REDI
Submitted to:
Environmental Management Bureau – Central Office
February 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 IEC MEETING AND FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION ................................................................... 2
2.1 Rationale and Objectives ................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Schedule and Participants .................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Highlights .......................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 INITIAL PERCEPTION SURVEY ............................................................................................. 8
3.1 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ..................................................................................................... 8
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Proposed Project, Proponent and EIA Preparer Details ...................................................................... 1
Table 2: Participants in the IEC activities .......................................................................................................... 3
Table 3: Matrix of Issues, Concerns, and Suggestions raised during IEC activities ............................................ 5
Table 4: Profile Summary of the Initial Perception Survey Respondents .......................................................... 8
Table 5: Results Summary of the Initial Perception Survey on the Proposed Project ....................................... 9
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Annex 1 : IEC Material
Annex 2 : Proof of Receipt of Letters
Annex 3 : Attendance Sheets of the IEC activities
Annex 4 : Sample filled out initial perception survey form
Annex 5 : Recording of the Online IEC Meeting
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
SECTION 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1
Reliance Energy Development Inc. (REDI) intends to construct and operate a 300 MW LNG
Combined Cycle Power Plant within the San Carlos City Ecozone in Barangays Punao and Palampas,
San Carlos City, Negros Occidental. Table 1 shows the details of the Project, Proponent and EIA
preparer.
2
REDI is a wholly owned subsidiary of SMC Global Power Holdings Corp. (SMC GPHC). SMC GPHC is
one of the largest power companies in the Philippines with a diversified portfolio utilizing a mix of
coal, natural gas, and hydroelectric plants. These power assets comprise of plants that are under
Independent Power Producer Administrator (IPPAs) agreements with the Power Sector Assets and
Liabilities Management Corp. and plants that are owned by/under joint-venture agreements with
SMC GPHC and are classified as Independent Power Producers (IPPs). It has seven (7) operational
power plants (3 - IPPAs; 1 - Joint Venture plant; 3 - IPPs) and one (1) greenfield power plant in the
pipeline.
Authorized Representative:
Mr. Rene R. Mendoza (Project Director)
EIA Preparer LCI Envi Corporation
Office Address: Unit 8L-M, Future Point Plaza 3, 111 Panay Avenue, South Triangle,
Quezon City
Tel. No.: (02) 8442-2830 / Fax No.: (02) 8961-9226
Authorized Representative:
Engr. Jose Marie U. Lim (EIA Team Leader)
Page 1
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
SECTION 2
2.0 IEC MEETING AND FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION
• LGUs in areas where all project facilities are proposed to be constructed/situated and
where all operations are proposed to be undertaken
o Municipality of San Carlos City
o Barangay Punao LGU
o Barangay Palampas LGU
o Barangay Poblacion 1 LGU
o Barangay Refugio LGU
• Interest groups (NGOs/POs) preferably those with mission/s specifically related to the
type and impacts of the proposed undertaking
o Farmer’s Organizations in Barangays Punao and Palampas
o Fisherfolks in Barangays Punao and Palampas
Page 2
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
Table 2: Participants in the IEC activities
TOTAL NO. OF
STAKEHOLDER GROUP/OFFICE/ORGANIZATION
REPRESENTATIVES
• LGUs in areas where all project facilities are proposed to be constructed/situated and where all
operations are proposed to be undertaken
o San Carlos City LGU
o Barangay Punao LGU 9
o Barangay Palampas LGU 9
o Barangay Poblacion 1 LGU 7
o Barangay Refugio LGU 9
• Reliance Energy Development Inc. (Proponent) 9
• LCI Envi Corporation (EIA Consultant) 3
2.3 HIGHLIGHTS
7
The photo-documentation of the IEC activity is provided in Figure 1. The issues and concerns raised
by the participants during the open forum per stakeholder groups and the corresponding
responses of of the proponent and the EIA study team, are summarized in Table 3.
8
The recording of the online IEC meeting conducted is attached as Annex 5 of this report.
Page 3
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
Figure 1: Photo Documentation of the Online IEC Meeting
Page 4
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
Figure 2: Photo Documentation of the FGDs
FGD with Barangay Poblacion 1 LGU on February 16, FGD with Barangay Refugio LGU on February 16,
2022 2022
SOURCE: Photos taken by LCI Study Team
Table 3: Matrix of Issues, Concerns, and Suggestions raised during IEC activities
ISSUES/CONCERNS/QUERIES RAISED BY RESPONSES
Online IEC Meeting (January 28, 2022)
We already gave the city Hon. Renato Y. Gustilo We will already start with our
endorsement for this project. San Carlos City Mayor application for the ECC of the
What other requirements do proposed project We wil apply the
you need to proceed with the ECC to EMB Central Office. We can
project? attach the city endorsement in our
EIS.
Page 5
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
ISSUES/CONCERNS/QUERIES RAISED BY RESPONSES
such as tree planting.
Page 6
RELIANCE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INC.
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Powerplant DOCUMENTATION REPORT
Brgy. Punao and Palampas, San Carlos City INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN (IEC)
ISSUES/CONCERNS/QUERIES RAISED BY RESPONSES
Engr. Joma Lim (EIA Consultant)
FGD with Barangay Refugio (February 16, 2022)
Will your project cause bad Hon. Alfredo Layague, Jr. The proposed project is not
odor during operation? Barangay Captain, Barangay expected to cause bad odors.
Refugio
Engr. Joma Lim (EIA Consultant)
There are mangroves in the Mr. Jerson H. Amparo Initial design of the project will not
project site. What are your SB Member include removal of the mangroves
plans for the mangroves? in the project site. But we will still
confirm this to the proponent.
Page 7
BELGROVE POWER CORPORATION
60 MW Gas Turbine Power Plant
Brgy. Malaya, Pililla, Rizal INITIAL PERCEPTION SURVEY RESULTS
SECTION 3
3.0 INITIAL PERCEPTION SURVEY
3.1 OBJECTIVE
10
The initial perception survey was conducted in conjunction with the IEC activities for the proposed
300 MW LNG Combined Cycle Power Plant. The objective of the activity is to assess the preliminary
knowledge and perception of the stakeholder representatives on the proposed project.
3.2 METHODOLOGY
11
The respondents were asked to fill out the initial perception survey form, which was written in
Tagalog. The initial perception survey form had two parts. The first part contained 10 questions
on the respondent’s profile, while the second part had 6 questions that aimed to gauge the
awareness and gather the opinions of the respondent regarding the proposed project.
Page 8
BELGROVE POWER CORPORATION
60 MW Gas Turbine Power Plant
Brgy. Malaya, Pililla, Rizal INITIAL PERCEPTION SURVEY RESULTS
ITEM RESULTS
▪ 3 percent answered that they were earning between Php 15,001 to
20,000.
▪ 16 percent answered that they were earning more than 20,000.
Table 5: Results Summary of the Initial Perception Survey on the Proposed Project
ITEM RESULTS
Awareness about the proposed ▪ 100 percent of the respondents were aware of the project.
Project ▪ 80 percent of the respondents learned about the project through
the barangay officials while 9 percent learned about the project
through meeting conducted for the project. Another 9 percent
heard the project from the proponent.
Opinion of the nature of the ▪ Around 97 percent of the respondents believed that the proposed
project project would be beneficial.
▪ 3 percent were unsure if the project will be beneficial nor
detrimental to the community.
Potential positive effects of the ▪ 59 percent answered that the proposed project could provide
project to the respondent, additional job opportunities to the people
community, and environment ▪ Around 23 percent said that it could increase business
opportunities.
▪ 18 percent answered the proposed project will generate additional
tax payment to the barangay
Potential negative effects of the ▪ 43 percent of the respondents said that it could cause air pollution.
project to the respondent, ▪ 6 percent of the respondents said that it will generat noise.
community, and environment ▪ 23 percent of the respondents said that it could cause water
pollution.
▪ 9 percent answered that the project will bring additional solid
wastes.
▪ Another 9 percent thinks that the project may cause soil
contamination
▪ 11 percent believed that the project may affect the water quality of
nearby river
Message to the Proponent ▪ 79 percent answered that the proponent must ensure that the
project should not cause pollution to the environmenta
▪ 20 percent said that the proponent should provide additional
projects and programs in the barangays.
Page 9
First Name Last Name Email Organization Job Title
Lauro Andrade landrade1965@yahoo.com SMC Global Consultant
Joma Lim joma.lim@lci-envi.com LCI TL
Marie Judith Palacio mjgonzalo@smcgph.sanmiguel.c SMCGPH-Power Expansion Group Planning & Document Controller
om.ph
SP San Carlos spsancarlos.no@gmail.com SP San Carlos Session Hall
City
Jerome Leano jerome.leano@lci-envi.com LCI Project Manager
Shealtiel Opelario sopelario@smcgph.sanmiguel.co SMCGPH - REDI Planning And Documentation Control
Kenan m.ph Engineer
Ronald Allan Sumague rsumague@smcgph.sanmiguel.c SMCGP Foundation Program Coordinator
om.ph
Eufemio Lazaro elazaro@smcgph.sanmiguel.com smcgph consultant
.ph
Marsha Bermejo marshatherese@yahoo.com.ph San Julio Realty, Inc Legal Officer
Cynthia Pantonal cpantonal@mppcl.sanmiguel.co SMCGP PHILIPPINES POWER Executive Director
m.ph FOUNDATION
Jerem Hipolito jeremarhipolito04@gmail.com Consultant Consultant
Rene Mendoza rrmendoza@smcgph.sanmiguel. SMC Global Consultant
com.ph