Tutorial 3
Tutorial 3
• Font size of 12
• Neutral font
• Please JUSTIFY your text
• Do not have long paragraphs
• Follow the instructions we set out in the assessment tab
• Please make sure you do not PLAGARISE, remember we will get the TI scores
• Referencing
• AI
• Book titles in italics
What is text justification
• Direct liaison with the Economics Society and in particular the President of the
Society. As you know we have created a link between the Society and the
department in this academic year. What we found last year was that the
President of the Society, a 3rd year student, was extremely committed but had
understandably other academic commitments and as such limited bandwidth.
In particular we have identified a number of areas that the SEO could work on
which are around 2 basic ideas; first around improving the overall student
experience for our students and second to create a sense of identity for
Economic students. The SEO could work closely with the President to forge
further the relationship between the society and the department.
How did this go and what does it
relate to?
• Give your friends 5 seconds to come up with the answer to one of the
following multiplication problems. In other words ask some to solve for a) and
others to solve for b)
• 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8 or
• 8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1
The concept of anchors is well
established but what K&T showed
that anchors still work even when
the anchor is totally arbitrary and
unrelated to the decision process
• Their research showed that
people’s judgement was
influenced by an “obviously
uninformative number” p. 120
• German judges with an average of more than 15 years
of experience read a description of a woman who had
been caught shoplifting, then rolled a pair of dice that
were loaded so that they landed on either a “3” or a
“9”.
8
• When the dice came to a stop, the judges were asked 2 questions
• 1) whether they would sentence the woman
to a term in prison greater of less than that
shown on the dice.
• 2) The judges were asked to specify the exact
prison sentence they would give to shoplifters.
• On average those that had rolled a “9” said they would sentence her to 8 months whilst
those that had rolled a “3” said that they would sentence her to 5 months.
• (source: Thinking, Fast and Slow by D Kahneman)
10
• Even experts decision making is
affected by psychological factors, even
if we want to believe that this is not
the case.
• How might an understanding of the
anchor effect assist you in a negotiation
process?
• Anchoring is a form of PRIMING
• Unconscious bias.
Fair or unfair
71% unfair
• Same scenario as before,
however the car dealer has been
selling cars at a discount of £300
to the list price. Now the dealer
sells the cars at the list price only.
• Fair or unfair?
58% fair
• Why the difference, in both cases there
is an increase in the price by £300.
• The coding of FRAMING of outcomes of an
outcome as either a gain or a loss affects our
Lesson beliefs of fairness
• A company has a large stock of
peanut butter in store. The owner
hears that the price of buying in
peanut butter has increased and
immediately rises the price of his
own existing stock.
• Fair?
•79% unfair
• There is a transportation
mishap which means that
the price of lettuce increases
by 30 p per head for a
grocer. The grocer raises the
price of the lettuce by 30 p
and in effect passes on the
increase to the consumer.
• Fair?
• 79% fair
We perceive it to be fair In that scenario the
when a company is business is not protecting
protecting itself from a loss itself from a loss but rather
much more than if they are making a gain and this is
doing something to make a perceived as unfair when it
profit. comes to passing on costs.
• An example of an experiment to test
overconfidence
The experiment I.
• Think about the following.
• We conducted an experiment to measure how overconfident people
are.
• The participants received the following instructions on their
computer:
• You will have one minute to solve as many calculations (adding up 6 2-
digit numbers) as possible.
• You receive 1 Pound for each correct calculation
The experiment
Partipants are told the following:
• You are randomly allocated with 3 other participants into a group of
4.
• Before solving the calculations, please state if you think that you will
save more calculations correctly than the average number of correctly
solved calculations within a group.
• If you guess is correct, you will receive another 2 Pounds.
After they state their belief, they start with 1 minute calculation
solving.
The data
• You receive an excel sheet with the following variables
• Nr: is just the unique participant number
• Group ID: ID of the group a participant belonged to
• Female: equal to 1 if someone is female
• Age: age in years
• Nationality: participant’s nationality
• Belief: equal to 1 if they guess they solve more calculations
correct than the group’s average performance
• Performance: number of correctly solved calculations
Here is the actual data
Nr Group ID Female Age Nationality Belief about performance Performance
1 1 1 20 UK 1 6
2 1 1 28 Italy 0 6
3 1 0 19 Germany 1 2
4 1 0 28 Italy 1 2
5 2 0 27 Germany 0 5
6 2 1 24 UK 0 1
7 2 1 26 UK 1 2
8 2 1 19 India 0 1
9 3 1 26 China 0 7
10 3 0 26 India 1 6
11 3 0 27 UK 1 5
• What sort of calculations could
you make from this
• Why might one be SCEPTICAL
of the results of the MT?