Neuropsychologia, 1968, Vol. 6, pp. 267 to 282. Pergamon Press.

Printed in Engkand

PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFTER

STAB W O U N D OF THE BASAL BRAIN*

H.-L. TEUBER
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, U.S.A.

BRENDA MILNER
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
and
H. G. VAUGHAN, JR.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, New York, U.S.A.

(Received 13 May 1968)

Ahstraet---A case of anterograde amnesia is described in which the memory disorder resulted
from a stab wound of the basal brain, a fencing foil having entered the brain through the right
nostril, taking a slightly oblique course to the left. Follow-up studies over seven years revealed
a persistent paralysis of upward gaze, as the only definite neurologic sign, together with
an anterograde amnesia in which verbal material was more affected than nonverbal. Percep-
tion and vigilance were intact. There were no seizures or seizure-equivalents, and in this respect
the patient's condition differed from that of H.M., the original case of anterograde amnesia
after bilateral hippocampectomy described by SCOVILLEand MILNER. The stab wound in
the present case appears to have involved the rostral midbrain. It is therefore of particular
interest that the anterograde amnesia was combined with impotence and profound unrespons-
iveness to pain.

DISORDERS of m e m o r y following t r a u m a to the h u m a n b r a i n are notoriously frequent, b u t

the majority of these cases are characterized by massive or diffuse cerebral damage, a n d
the a m n e s i a itself appears within a context of other disturbances, in which disorders of
vigilance a n d perception play a special role. I n fact, attempts have often been made to
interpret the amnestic s y n d r o m e as a mere consequence of those other changes with which
it tends to be associated; i.e. lack of c o m p r e h e n s i o n of o n g o i n g events p r o d u c i n g the
failure of m o r e p e r m a n e n t registration.
Such interpretations of a m n e s i a as a secondary effect, however, become sharply limited
as soon as one considers instances of relatively selective m e m o r y disorders after circum-
scribed ablations of cerebral tissue, as in the prototype case of SCOVILLE a n d MILNER [31],
where bilateral removals from the h i p p o c a m p a l zone, offered for relief of intractable
epilepsy, resulted i n a n anterograde amnesia, which has lasted now, with only slight
i m p r o v e m e n t , for nearly fifteen years. Extensive studies (the most recent ones described

* From the Psychophysiological Laboratory and the Clinical Research Center, M.I.T. The program
of research of which this study forms a part is supported by the Hartford Foundation, by NASA and by the
National Institutes of Health (under MH-05673, and a Clinical Research Center Grant, FR 88). Additional
support for Brenda Milner came from the Medical Research Council of Canada.

267
268 H.-L. TEUBER,BRENDAMtLNERand H. G. VAUGHAN,JR..

elsewhere in this issue) have made it clear that the perceptual disorders in that case were
insufficient to account for the much more severe disturbances of long-term registration.
Because of the importance of such instances for any theory of memory, a somewhat
similar case of selective anterograde amnesia is here reported. The initial state resembled
that of H.M. [31], although the memory loss became less severe with time, leaving the
patient with a residual syndrome in which disorders of verbal memory were predominant.
At no time was there any epilepsy, nor any trouble of perception or vigilance. The case
was studied in direct comparison with H.M., often with identical experimental methods.
Accordingly, our report will focus on the similarities and differences which this comparison
of the two cases has disclosed. It will be apparent that the new case can supplement certain
lessons drawn from H.M.

CASE R E P O R T

N.A. (born July 9, 1938), a young American airman, was injured on December 15,
1960, while stationed at the Azores. The injury resulted from a mock duel with another
serviceman, when a miniature fencing foil entered the patient's right nostril and punctured
the base of the brain, after taking an obliquely upward course, slightly to the left.

1. Early course after injury

According to the service medical records, the immediate effect was not unconsciousness,
but profound lethargy. There was moderate bleeding from the right nostril; the pupils
were maximally constricted and fixed to light and accommodation. There was a convergent
squint, and a fine rotatory nystagmus of the right eye. The admitting medical officer also
noted a minimal right hemiparesis, which could not be demonstrated a day later, nor, for
that matter, at any time thereafter. Nevertheless, this initial asymmetry of motor involve-
merit is consistent with greater damage on the left side of the brain.
According to the records from that hospital, the patient was still confused and dis-
oriented on the second day after injury, but responded to commands. No sensory losses
were demonstrable, then or later. There was a spontaneous pneumoencephalogram with
a small bone chip visualized in the right sphenoid sinus.
For the first three days, the patient had a fluctuating temperature and made continual
chewing movements. The pupils remained fixed to light and accommodation, and there
was complete paralysis of upward gaze. Speech was described as well-articulated but
irrelevant and confused. From the fourth day onward, rhinorrhea was noted, which con-
tinued intermittently until two weeks after the accident, when a frontal craniotomy was
performed; a dural tear was found overlying the tuberculum sellae and was repaired.
For the first few days after operation, the patient's state of consciousness varied from
alert to deeply lethargic, but by the end of the first month after the injury, he was con-
sidered to be fully alert, his speech was deemed relevant, and his comprehension intact.
However, there was said to be profound loss of recent memory; the pupils were still un-
responsive to light and accommodation, and there was the previously noted paralysis of
upward gaze. This Parinaud syndrome, together with a defect in retaining ongoing events,
were reported consistently as the only obvious sequelae of the accident demonstrable on
neurologic examination.
 PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFTER STAB W O U N D OF THE BASAL BRAIN 269

Initial retrograde amnesia. The examiners (including H.V., who saw the patient at the
Philadelphia Naval Hospital) noted that at first he seemed to be unable to recall any
significant personal, national or international events for the two years preceding the
accident, but this extensive retrograde amnesia appeared to shrink paripassu with improve-
ment in his posttraumatic state. Two-and-a-half years after the accident, the retrograde
amnesia was said to involve a span of perhaps two weeks immediately preceding the injury,
but the exact extent of this retrograde loss was (and remains) impossible to determine.
Early stages in anterograde amnesia. During this early period of convalescence (for
the first six to eight months after the accident), the patient's recall of day-to-day events
was described as extremely poor, but "occasionally some items sprang forth uncontrollably;
he suddenly recalled something he seemed to have no business recalling." His physicians
thus gained the impression that his memory was patchy: he appeared to have difficulty in
calling up at will many things that at other times emerged spontaneously.
Mood; awareness o[" illness. At this time N.A. impressed his examiners as "not
euphoric but lacking in affect appropriate to his condition," and his behavior still fits this
description. Yet ever since the early posttraumatic period he has shown full awareness of
his defect: he apologizes constantly for his poor memory, but insists that he will soon
get over it and resume his interrupted college education.
Psychometric data. During the one year spent in college before his entry into the Air
Force a~d subsequent injury, the patient took a number of vocational aptitude tests. The
results of these tests suggest superior mechanical aptitude and interests compatible with
the patient's original ambitions of becoming an engineer.
On March 27, 1961, 3½ months after the accident, he was tested with the Wechsler
Adult Intelligence Scale, obtaining a verbal intelligence quotient of 101, a performance
quotient of 98, and a full-scale quotient of 99. His examiner at the Naval Hospital suggested
that these results (although within the normal range) might represent a significant drop
from his pre-injury level, which was estimated on the basis of his scholastic achievements
as being considerably higher. In contrast, his performance on the Memory Scale [35] was
grossly defective: his memory quotient was given as 64, which is considerably below his
rated intelligence at that time.

2. Subsequent clinical course

Following his discharge from the naval hospital in August, 1961, the patient was in
the care of his mother and his stepfather, who took up residence in a small coastal town
not far from San Diego, California. Since his injury, he has been unable to return to any
gainful employment, although his memory has continued to improve, albeit slowly.
Throughout this seven-year period, N.A. has been subjected to repeated examinations,
twice in the MIT laboratories (for one week each time, in January and October, 1964), and
twice on home visits (in October, 1966, and August, 1967). Improvement in his memory
was noted particularly on his second admission in 1964, and has continued since, although
the recovery of his verbal memory has been lagging in relation to performance on other
material-specific memory tasks, producing an evident asymmetry in the residual loss.
Thus, on his first visit to MIT, he failed to recognize H.V. although H.V. had cared for
him at the Philadelphia Naval Hospital. On his second visit, however, he correctly stated
that he had met H.L.T. the previous time (8½ months earlier), and that B.M. had not seen
 Hipótese: contraste
de memórias
pré-acidente e
270 H.-L. TEUBER,BRENDAMILNERand H. G. VAUGHAN,JR. pós-acidente

him before, but he still could not produce H.L.T.'s name. Even on that second visit, he
could not describe more than an isolated fragment or two in trying to relate the plot of a
movie seen the night before. He complained that he forgot the story-line of television
plays whenever they were interrupted by commercials. All this was in striking contrast to
the patient's facility in recounting premorbid events in their proper order and in con-
siderable detail. Thus he was able to enumerate five different addresses at which his family
had lived consecutively before his injury.
As in other instances of persistent anterograde amnesia [30, 37, 38] N.A. has not been
able to give any account of the early posttraumatic period, although he seems vaguely
aware that he may have been in one or several hospitals, at various times, since his injury.
There is thus nothing like the tendency one finds so commonly in patients who recover
from a period of posttraumatic amnesia, and who insist that there was a definite moment,
which they can recall, when their memory "came back," or "things became clear again."
N o r does N.A. report any "islands" of memory which, again, are so typical of the more
usual posttraumatic state.
experiência
s em que Autoscopy. Nevertheless, N.A. does produce a remarkable storywhich he localizes
o sujeito subjectively in the period of his early convalescence. He tells this story in unvarying
se vê forafashion, except for a different ending, whenever he is asked to comment on his hospital
do corpo
experience: " I think I remember a time, many times, when I used to sit in a movie theater,
and there was this fellow on the screen, in the movies, with his head all bandaged, and he
seemed to be in pain. I said---every time I saw h i m - - s o m e b o d y do something for h i m - -
give him a glass of water or something--and then suddenly (and here comes the variation
in the end of the story)--suddenly, last night (or, at other tellings of the story: suddenly,
a year ago--suddenly, last week, etc.), I realized this fellow on the screen was 1."
N.A.'s mother alluded independently and spontaneously to such a form of autoscopy,
when she told one of us (H.L.T.) on the second visit to the patient's home that her son
used to say rather irrational things as long as 1½ years after his injury. Once, while he was
resting on his bed, with his mother sitting at the side of the bed, he suddenly complained
(according to his mother), "why are you paying so much attention to the fellow on the
bed instead of paying attention to m e ? " Quite similar forms of autoscopy have been
reported in cases of twilight state, in delirium, and in postencephalitic conditions [8, 12,
13, 15].
Everyday behavior
The home visits revealed that N.A. leads a rather indolent life, mowing his lawn and
performing other chores around the house and garden if, and only if, he is instructed
to do so ("driven to it," according to his mother). He takes long walks up and down the
beach (which is within a block of their house), but apparently becomes unsure of the
direction in which he would have to return to their house, unless he asks. He had tried, at
the urging of one of us, to work in a local TV repair shop, but lost the job on the second
day, although not for lack of the requisite mechanical skill.
According to his mother, he took up the hobby of building plane models in 1965. His
first models were clumsily done, but his skill improved; at the time of our visit in 1966,
several of his models were on public exhibit in San Diego.
The patient's room is extremely tidy and full of his airplane models. Apparently, he
spends a good deal of time putting his room in order; once he has finished, he proceeds
to tidy up the rooms of his mother and stepfather, much to their annoyance.
 PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFTER STAB W O U N D OF THE BASAL BRAIN 271

Unresponsiveness to pain. Numerous instances were discovered during the home visits
that point to an unusual degree of pain tolerance in N.A. His mother complained that he
would frequently buy himself shoes that were too small, and then wear them, oblivious of
the severe blisters that formed on his feet. As another instance of unusual tolerance for
pain, his mother repolted that in 1966 he had found a wild seal on the beach near their
house. He picked up the seal and was promptly bitten severely around the flanks; the
lacerations bled profusely and required suturing. However, throughout this episode, N.A.
expressed no discomfort and refused all pain-reducing medication. N o r does he complain
of ordinary, everyday pain, such as headache or stomach-ache, although he sometimes tells
his mother that he has hunger "pains" (presumably meaning hunger pangs), if he has not
eaten for five hours or so. Even then, he does not seem distressed.
The continued tolerance of pain was underscored in a very recent report. In 1967,
N.A. and his mother went on a round-the-world cruise. On this trip it was noted that he
walked with his bare feet on the hot metal deck of the cruise ship, incurring burns on his
soles, to the point where his fellow passengers complained of the unpleasant odor; he
himself did not seem to mind.

Impotence. N.A.'s unresponsiveness to pain seems combined with an apparent loss of

sexual drive. That he nfight be actually impotent came to our attention as follows: With
some reluctance, his mother told us that her son had recently been "rushed into marriage"
by a girl he had known as a fellow-student before his accident. The mother insisted that
she knew for certain that her son and this girl had had frequent sexual relations while in
college. The girl had persuaded N.A. (against the advice of both families) to marry her in
the fall of 1965; the two young people lived at the home of the girl's parents, but seven
weeks later the marriage was annulled because "it had never been consummated."

3. Results of further tests and experimental procedures

The patient underwent numerous laboratmy procedures during his two visits to MIT.
These included neurologic and E E G studies, extensive sensory and sensorimotor tests, and
various perceptual and learning tasks.

Neurological examinations. Detailed neurologic testing in 1964, 1966 and 1967 revealed
each time an essentially normal neurologic status, except for the continuing anterograde
amnesia and the oculomotor syndrome. The latter consisted of an inability to move the
eyes upward upon command, with a slight but consistent difference between the eyes, the
left eye rising on effort a bit above the horizontal plane and producing a skew deviation,
with a moderate vertical nystagmus, as long as the effort to look upwards was maintained.
On passive forward flexion of the neck, however, the patient showed a classical doll's head
phenomenon, the eyes moving promptly, if transiently, to the extreme vertical upward
position. There always was binocular diplopia on attempted conjugate gaze to the right.
In contrast, the tendon reflexes were normal, although slightly more brisk on the right,
while abdominal and cremasteric reflexes were diminished on that side. The right palpebral
fissure was slightly narrower than the left, and there was a bare hint of a right facial weak-
ness, of central type. There were no obvious changes in strength or tone, in any extremity.
Gait and attitude were normal, and extensive (quantitative) sensory, auditory, and visual-
field studies failed to disclose any abnormality in somesthesis, audition or vision. The
electroencephalogram was likewise considered as completely normal, as were the patient's
272 H.-L. TEUBER,BRENDAMILNERand H. G. VAUGHAN,JR.

computer-averaged cerebral potentials evoked by single and repeated flashes of light (H.V.).
There were no signs (nor was there any history) of seizures, nor of seizure-equivalents.
There were no abnormalities in the sleep-wakefulness and body-temperature cycles observed
at successive three-hour intervals for three consecutive days and nights, while the patient
was in the Clinical Research Center.

Amytal interview. Because of the unusual features of this case, N.A. was interviewed
in 1964 under Sodium Amytal. As in case P.B. of PENFIELD and MILNER [27], his memory
disorder was enhanced rather than diminished, while under the influence of the drug.

Standard tests of intelligence and memory. A follow-up examination with the Wechsler
Scale (carried out at MIT by Dr. Suzanne Corkin on October 20, 1964) gave N.A. a full-
scale intelligence quotient of 118, with a verbal quotient of 113 and a performance quotient
of 120. It thus appears that ordinary test-intelligence had recovered sufficiently to parallel
the patient's estimated pre-injury level. A similar pattern of initial fall and subsequent rise
was seen on successive testing with the Wechsler Memory Scale. In October, 1964, N.A.
achieved a memory quotient of 94, which represents a marked improvement over the
values of 64 and 72 obtained in March, 1961 and May, 1962, respectively. However, the
memory quotient was still clearly inferior to the intelligence quotient.

Special perceptual and perceptual-motor tests. N.A. excelled most normal subjects on
a variety of perceptual tasks, which included tachistoscopy and measures of visual search.
He showed normal fushion-thresholds for flickering light, and, according to Dr. Peter
Schiller, normal "metacontrast"; i.e. normal interaction between stimuli when two visual
patterns are exposed briefly in succession, with varying inter-stimulus intervals. He also
did as well as normal control subjects in the adaptation of visually-guided reaching, for
targets viewed through distorting and displacing (i.e. prismatic) spectacles. Like H.M., he
showed normal learning of a mirror-drawing task, when tested over three consecutive days.

Hidden-figures test. The patient was given the hidden-figures test, in which certain
geometric patterns have to be traced within a welter of embedding and overlapping lines
(modified GOTTSCHALDTfigures [6]). This task had previously been found to be difficult
for men with penetrating trauma of the cerebral convexity, irrespective of the lobe injured
[33]; (see Fig. 1). Similar results were obtained later by VIGNOLO [34] for cases of vascular
disease or brain tumor, and severe deficit on the task has been reported by TALLANO [32]
for patients with amnesia arising in the context of Korsakov's disease. As Fig. 1 shows,
our patient, N.A., not only surpassed the group averages of the previously-studied traumatic
cases, but also surpassed most of our normal control subjects, obtaining a score of 43.
In contrast, H.M., who tends to work slowly on most tests, earned the much lower score
of 23 on the same task. N.A. obviously enjoyed the test, announcing that it was easy.
When confronted with the same test on the following day, he obtained the same high score,
though ta king an even shorter time, but denied that he had ever done or seen the test before.

Sorting test. We had a similar experience on administering the Wisconsin version [7]
of WEIGL'S [36] well-known sorting test. Here the patient readily indicated that he under-
stood the instructions, and, like H.M., sorted the cards correctly according to the three
principles of color, form and number, shifting from one category to another as requited
by the structure of the task. His performance was superior to that of most of our control
subjects, as he achieved runs of I0 su~essive correct responses to each of the 3 categories
 PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFTER STAB WOUND OF THE BASAL BRAIN 273

twice in 93 trials. At the end, he explained the principles accurately. T w o hours later,
however, he did not seem to remember the test, yet he completed it in fewer trials the
following day, although stating flatly that he had never encountered the material before.

45-
x\\\\
,\xx~
~NNN~

xxx\,
° ° ,

d 3o - ::::::
°°°°°° ~xxx~
°.° .o
~xxx~

: :.:.:.
o ° °
°°o°.°
°°o°°°
Is :.:.:.
o.°O,, ~xxx~
.:.:.:
, ° . ~xxx~
, ° .
, , ,
, ° ,
, , ,
, , .

Control F P T 0 H.M, N.A.

Subiects Patient G r o u p s Individual Scores

Fio. 1. Mean scores on hidden-figure test (modified Gottschaldt figures), for 43 normal
control subjects, and for groups of cases with penetrating missile wounds of the cerebral
convexity, viz. 32 frontal (F), 26 parietal (P), 23 temporal (T), and 28 occipital (O) penetra-
tions (based on TEUBER and WEINS~IN [33]). Scores for patient H.M., the case of bi-
lateral hippocampectomy, and for N.A., the case of stab wound of the basal brain, are
added for comparison. H.M.'s performance is impaired; N.A.'s performance is superior.

Formal tests of memory defect. All these instances of integrity of performance stand
in clear contrast to the patient's continuing difficulty in acquiring new information. This
amnestic disorder was explored further by B.M. in 1964. The tests used wer~ those developed
in Montreal for the study of "material-specific" memory loss after unilateral temporal-lobe
removals, right and left [18, 21], as well as for assessing the more severe amnesias resulting
from bilateral mesial temporal-lobe damage.

Maze-learning. On a visually-guided stepping-stone maze, originally administered to

H.M. [16. 17], N.A. took nearly twice as many trials to learn the correct path as the slowest
learner in Milner's normal control group. He required 47 trials and made 188 errors
before reaching the criterion of 3 successive errorless runs. The normal control group
averaged 17 trials and 92 errors. Figure 2 shows N.A.'s learning curve plotted on the same
scale as that of S.D., the slowest normal subject; S.D. reached criterion in 27 trials, with
175 errors.
N.A.'s impaired performance on this task becomes more notable if one realizes that,
like H.M., he shows superior pelformance on spatial tasks that do not require the storage
of new information; for example, he is good at copying designs with blocks. N o r can his
slow maze-learning be attributed to his verbal-memory defect, since patients tested two
weeks after left anterior temporal lobectomy show normal maze-learning, despite their
dysphasia and trouble with verbal recall.
N.A. was subsequently trained, by Dr. Suzanne Corkin, on a tactually-guided alley-
maze. He reached criterion in 46 trials with 221 errors, in comparison wi*h mean values
of roughly 30 trials and 90 errors for her normal control group [5]. Figure 3 shows N.A.'s
learning curve for the tactual maze, together with the curves for the two least efficient
274 H.-L. TEUBER, BRENDAMILNER and H. G. VAUGHAN,JR.

n o r m a l subjects, one o f w h o m (S.D.) was also the slowest learner a m o n g the n o r m a l

subjects tested on the visual maze (Fig. 2).

15,
= =Case N.A.
¢,- • ~.Control Subject

-~ ioi
Le~

o
ua

I I L__ _
4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 T r i a l Block
I ~essio~-- .-- n .

FIG. 2. Visual maze [17]: learning curve for patient N.A., compared with the curve for the
slowest normal control subject (S.D.). N.A. took longer in mastering the maze. Patient
H.M., however, did not learn the maze at all.

N . A . ' s t a c t u a l - m a z e p e r f o r m a n c e can be considered m o d e r a t e l y i m p a i r e d , a n d again

the deficit c a n n o t be regarded as s e c o n d a r y to the verbal m e m o r y difficulty, because
dysphasic patients with recent left t e m p o r a l lobectomies a n d p r o n o u n c e d verbal m e m o r y
disturbance learn the tactual m a z e at a n o r m a l rate. N . A . ' s a b o v e - a v e r a g e intelligence a n d
superior s p a t i a l ability w o u l d lead one to predict a m o r e efficient p e r f o r m a n c e on this task.
It is clear, however, that neither on the tactual n o r the visual maze does his learning i m p a i r -
m e n t a p p r o a c h t h a t o f H . M . , who showed no d i m i n u t i o n o f error-score on either t a s k
over several days o f testing.

80
q
\

60
"~'.. .A.

2
40 S'G" "~" \ "".

"8
°..° ,,~

20 "'b.....~....~.%

o I I J [ [ .
1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50
TrlaJs
FIG. 3. "Factual maze [5]: learning curve for N.A., compared with curves for S.G. and S.U.,
the two slowest learners in the normal control group. (Data supplied by Dr. Suzanne Corkin).
 PERSlSTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFI-ER STAB WOUND OF THB BASAL BRAIN 275

Delayed viswd rep~~~~cti~~(Rey-Osterriethfigure>. That N.A. has a relatively mild

but pe~istent defect in the memo~~tion of nonverbal material was still evident in 1966,
when he was tested with the familiar Rey-Osterrieth drawing shown in Fig. 4 [29,24f.

FIG. 4. Rey-Osterrieth figure 129, 241.

N.A. was fvst asked to copy this complex design; then, about 40 minutes later, and
without forewarning, he was asked to draw the figure again, as accurately as he could,
from memory. His copy and the delayed reproduction are both shown in Fig. 5.

Performance of patient N.A. on the Rey-iSsterrieth test. Above, the

of the model; below, his drawing from recall, 40 mimztea later.
276 H.-L. TEUBER, BRENDA M1LNER and H. G. VAUGHAN, JR.

This visual, nonverbal, memory task is one on which patients with left temporal-lobe
lesions in the dominant hemisphere for speech show no impairment, in contrast to their
marked difficulty with verbal memory tests. Right temporal lobectomy, conversely, pro-
duces a slight but significant defect in copying the Rey figure and a pronounced accentuation
of the defect on delayed recall (TAYLOR, in preparation), but no verbal m e m o r y defect.
Table 1 permits a comparison of N.A.'s scores with those of the left and right temporal-

Table 1. Reproduction of Rey-Osterrieth figure by N.A. and by patients tested at least

one year after left or right temporal lobectomy* (Maximum score: 36)

Delayed
Copy reproduction Loss (~,,)

N.A. 32 17 47
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
Left temporal 33.1 30-35 21.2 t4.5-28.0 36 20-54
(N = 19)
Right temporal 30.0 22-34 14.2 6.0-24.5 53 24-80
(N=26)

* These scores were obtained by L. Taylor in Montreal.

lobe groups respectively. On copying, N.A. shows no abnormality, his score of 32 being
close to the mean score for the left temporal group; but the loss on delayed recall is quite
striking, especially if one looks at this loss as yet another instance of the discrepancy
between this patient's intact spatial and constructive abilities and his impaired capacity
for storing new information.

Continuous recognition tests (recurring visual stimuli). A more meaningful picture of

the quality of N.A.'s memory disorder comes from two continuous recognition tasks,
which were given in October, 1964, at about the same time as the maze-learning tasks
previously described.
One recognition task involved recurring "nonsense" figures; with this task, KIMURA
[10] has shown convincingly that right temporal-lobe excisions, involving inferior lateral,
as well as mesial (hippocampal) cortex, are followed by deficits in recognition that do not
appear after similar removals from the left hemisphere. In contrast, with an analogous
task involving words, nonsense syllables and three-digit numbers, specific deficits in recog-
nition appear after left temporal-lobe removals, even in the absence of clinically detectable
dysphasia, whereas normal scores are obtained by the right temporaMobe group [19].
For the nonverbal task, 160 cards are used. The patient is shown one card at a time,
for 3 sec each; the card bears either a nonsense design or some unfamiliar geometric
figure, making it difficult for the patient to use verbal labels in committing the pattern to
memory. The test is presented in successive blocks of 20 cards; in each block 8 figures
recur, while the rest occur only once. The task is to recognize the recurring figures by
saying "yes" when they occur, and " n o " when the figure shown is in fact novel. On the
 PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFTER STAB ~A,'OUND OF THE BASAL BRAIN 277

first block of 20 test cards normal subjects make numerous errors, but their performance
improves markedly on the second block of cards, and levels off thereafter. The verbal
form of the test has analogous structure, permitting a similar measure of improvement
over the series of trials.
Figure 6 shows N.A.'s performance on both the nonverbal and the verbal forms of
this test, as compared with the mean scores achieved by nozmal control subjects, and by

Verbal r•Normal
Control
[ ] L e f t Temporal
.j.:.: ~ l;t;~ht Temporal
*.....
%°°°°
Nonverbal ..°..° N.A.
4O °....-
.-°°°.
..... ...... .,......
o...

i i i!i i i!i!il
o) .....
i':'~': iiiiiiiiiiiii ...*..
0 .'.'.'. ....o°
30 :;:::': .%%°
,.%%°
,°..-o-

°..
..%%,
= 28 "~'It.:Temp. :Cont.
,.-.°°.
~ ......, , ..-..
,,%%.
=E 2:2:22;
• ..,.,
,,%%°
,...°°°
..%% ,°....
, .. .°..
10 ::::•:
p...
~°.,
..%,, ~°.,
~...-.,
,.°,
o i!iiiiiiiiiii!i
iii
Subjects

FIG. 6. Performance of patient N.A. on two visual recognition tasks (recurring nonsense
figures, and recurring words, nonsense syllables, and numbers) compared with that of
normal control subjects and of groups of patients with removals from left and right temporal
lobes, respectively [19]. Note that N.A.'s performance is similar to that of the right temporal-
lobe group on the nonverbal task (both being impaired) but is inferior to that of all other
groups on the verbal task.

groups of patients tested one or more years after left or right temporal-lobe resections,
respectively. It is evident that the tasks bring out material-specific memory defects [18]:
left temporal-lobe removals produce persistent deficits on the verbal form of the test but
not on the nonverbal; right temporal-lobe removals have the reverse effect. As Fig. 6
shows, N.A. does as poorly on the nonverbal task as the patients with right temporal-lobe
resections; on the verbal task his deficit is still more conspicuous, his performance being
inferior to that of both unilateral temporal-lobe groups. His nonverbal recognition-defect
is thus seen to be congruent with the mild but unequivocal impairment in maze learning,
both visual and tactual, already noted. His verbal recognition-defect is far more striking;
in fact, it is more severe than that shown by dysphasic patients in the early postoperative
period after a left temporal lobectomy. Yet N.A.'s verbal trouble seems to be specific to
the sphere of memory; there is no clinical evidence of dysphasia, and, on a timed test of
object naming [22, 23] he named all objects promptly and correctly.
Figure 7 compares N.A.'s performance on the two continuous recognition tasks with
that of four patients (including H.M.), all of w h o m had profound amnestic syndromes,
which were attributable to bilateral mesial temporal-lobe damage. It is apparent that
N.A.'s verbal recognition defect is as grave as that displayed by any of the patients with
bilateral mesial temporal-lobe involvement. On the nonverbal task, N.A.'s deficit is seen
 278 H.-I.. TEUBER, BRENDA MILNER and H. G. VAUGHAN, R.

to be much less severe than theirs. The performance of the other amnesic patients on
these two tests reflects the greater difficulty of the nonverbal task for normal subjects, as
well as the relative severity of their individual memory disorders.

3e
o
,X

Z 20

1962 1966 1962 1966

Subjects

FIG. 7. Performance of amnesic patients on the two continuous visual recognition tasks.
Scores for individual patients are compared with the average scores for normal control
subjects. P.B. and F.C. had sustained unilateral (left) temporal Iobectomies, with persisting
electrographic disturbances in the right temporal lobe (i.e. on the side contralateral to the
excision). D.C. (not operated upon at the Montreal Neurological Institute) was referred
for study after bilateral mesial temporalqobe resection combined with orbito-frontal under-
cutting [31]. H.M. (tested twice) is the case of bilateral hippocampectomy, and N.A. the case of
stab wound of the basal brain. Note that N.A.'s performance on the verbal task resembles
that of the other cases of amnesia, but that he surpasses them on the nonverbal task.

DISCUSSION

Our initial interest in this case was aroused by its seeming similarity to the case, H.M.,
of SCOVILLE and MILNER [31]. It may therefore be appropriate to review those aspects of
the two cases in which they resemble each other, and those in which they differ.

Syndromes
Both N.A. and H.M. exhibit a relatively unmixed anterograde amnesia, but H.M.'s
condition is obviously much more severe, with comparatively little improvement over the
fourteen years of postoperative observation (although some improvement, of delayed
onset, has recently been noted). In contrast, N.A.'s condition has improved considerably
over the seven years since his accident. Unexpectedly, this improvement went beyond the
early post-traumatic period; in fact, a rather conspicuous spurt was noted between the
patient's first and second visits to the M.I.T. laboratory, 37 and 46 months, respectively,
after the wounding. For this reason, the results of the special memory tests reported
above (most of which were carried out from 46 months to six years after the injury) almost
certainly fail to reflect the severity of the initial amnestic disorder in this case.
It is clear that N.A.'s residual amnesia shows a marked asymmetry, verbal material
being more difficult for him to retain than material that cannot readily be verbalized; in
this respect N.A. differs from H.M., whose amnesia was equally severe for both types of
material.
 PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA AFTER STAB W O U N D OF THE BASAl, BR~,IN 279

Also in contrast to H.M., our patient N.A. had a normal EEG with every method of
recording that was used. He has never been subject to seizures or seizure-like episodes,
and he is keenly alert and attentive. He performs extremely well on a great variety of
perceptual tasks, and shows no sensory or motor deficits outside the oculomotor sohere.
The integrity of N.A.'s performance in all these respects gives support to our belief
that H.M.'s seizure disorder, his somatosensory deficits, and his relative slowness on
certain timed tasks are merely symptoms which happen to be associated with his amnestic
state but do not form its root. Perceptual difficulties are, in principle, dissociable from the
memory disorder; seizures and abnormal EEG activities are not necessary for the appear-
ance of anterograde amnesia in man.
Lesions
We must admit that the effective lesion in N.A.'s case remains a matter of surmise.
The absence, withirt days of the trauma, of any motor or sensory disturbances, except for
the persistent paralysis of upward gaze, is consistent with the belief that the puncture
would have involved the superior quadrigeminal region, entering the brain from below, just
to the left of the midline. In addition, the diminished pupiUary reaction to light suggests
some involvement of the pretectal region. The lesion may thus have been quite circumscribed,
although the extent of local damage may have been increased by vascular involvement, or
as a consequence of infection during the immediate post-traumatic period.
Other cases of stab wound involving the base of the brain have been reported, with
dissimilar consequences depending on whether the peduncle was affected [2] or the central
gray [11]. In the former case, there was unilateral (ipsilateral) ophthalmoplegia, and a
massive pyramidal-tract syndrome on the contralateral side of the body, but no persistent
anterograde amnesia. In the second case [11], the picture resembled that presented by
N.A. in several respects: there were oculomotor abnormalities involving both eyes, some
retrograde amnesia, and marked anterograde amnesia. Unfortunately, the record does
not reflect on such possible associated symptoms as unresponsiveness to pain, or reduction
in sexual drive.
The curious form of autoscopy reported by N.A. has been said to occur in cases of
space-occupying lesions in the region of the third ventricle (craniopharyngiomas; supra-
sellar tumors), and a more general hallucinosis is often described as part of a peduncular
syndrome [8].
Whatever the exact lesion in N.A.'s case, it is probably rather different from that of
H.M., where the memory disorder appeared after bilateral hippocampectomy. The pre-
sumed difference in lesion site supports the belief that amnestic syndromes can be produced
by interfering with diverse parts of a complex anatomical system [1, 30].
Nature of memory disturbance
As to the nature of the amnesia in N.A.'s case, enough has been said to underline the
features which have been thoroughly described for H.M. : There is orderly retrieval of
early (premorbid) material, except for the time just preceding the trauma, although the
exact extent of N.A.'s residual retrograde amnesia remains in doubt. In common with
H.M. and similar cases of persisting anterograde amnesia, N.A. went through a prolonged
period of confusion beginning immediately after the trauma. The residual anterograde
amnesia was characterized in both cases by a short-term memory that seemed more nearly
intact than the capacity for long-term registration; theiI perceptual and intellectual
Capacities, apart from those requiring long-term retention of ongoing events, appeared to
280 H.-L. "I-EUBER,BRENDAMILNERand H. G. VAU(3HAN,JR.

be essentially preserved, producing a picture of amnesia that could not be reduced to any
initial failure of categorizing the immediate experience.
Other associated symptoms may have to be studied further, in larger numbers of cases,
before it can be determined whether these too are dissociable from the memory disorder.
In particular, the somewhat impassive disposition noted in N.A., may be an integral
part of the amnesic syndrome or a neighborhood symptom without intimate relation to
the difficulties of retention. Similarly, the apparent indifference to normally painful stimuli
and the marked reduction in sexual drive (actual impotence ?) need to be further explored
in other cases, in order to see whether one is dealing with a coincidental constellation or a
necessary association of symptoms.
In attempts at interpreting the amnesic syndrome in terms of mechanism, it has at
times been suggested that the brain structures which mediate the transition from short-
term to long-term memory (more permanent "encoding") are identical with those involved
in voluntary retrieval (deliberate recall). The suggestion is attractive, because it appears to
fit certain observations on the effects of stimulation of anterior mesial brain structures in
conscious man. We know, for example, that transient amnesias can sometimes be induced
by stimulating the amygdala (with spread of abnormal activity to the hippocampus), these
amnesias having both retrograde and anterograde components [3, 4, 14]; conversely, a
forced reliving of entire scenes has been evoked in epileptic patients upon stimulating
temporal neocortex [26, 28], although the hippocampus itself has usually been behaviorally
silent to electrical stimulation [9, 25]; but see CHAPMAN et aL [4].
Unfortunately for any simplifying interpretation, retrieval of older traces is essentially
normal even in such a persistent anterograde amnesia as that exhibited by H.M. It is the
inability to retrieve ongoing events, beyond an initial period of retention, together with
the persistent failme of access to events immediately preceding the onset of the lesion
(retrograde amnesia) that need to be explained.
Beyond this, any neurologic theory of memory will have to account for the fact that
feelings of familiarity can be so readily dissociated from recall of events as such, so that
some things may be remembered without the slightest familiarity ("jamais vu"), or new
events registered with a false but overwhelming sense of familiarity ("d6j~ v u " ) - - t h e
"mental diplopia" of Hughlings Jackson.
Lastly, in attempting to formulate a theory of memory, one must consider the fact
that memory losses can be, to some extent, material-specific [18]. Appropriate techniques
can demonstrate that right temporal-lobe lesions produce amnesia for certain kinds of
nonverbal material, and that left temporal lesions have an equally selective effect upon
memory for verbal material. N.A., whose lesion appeared to involve basal brain regions
slightly to the left of the midline, soon began to show an asymmetry in the pattern o f his
anterograde amnesia (having greater trouble with verbal than with nonverbal material),
although initially he had been almost globally amnesic. The suggestion might be made
that rostral projections from the midbrain could account for the observed asymmetry. On
this view, hypothetical mechanisms for long-term memory would operate from below on
the differentially specialized right and left cerebral hemispheres of man.
Acknowledgments--We thank Dr. SUZANNECORKINand DR. THOMASTWITCHELLfor their help in assessing
N. A., and Mr. LAUGHLINTAYLORfor access to unpublished data on patients undergoing temporal lobectomy
at the Montreal Neurological Institute.
REFERENCES
1. ADAMS,R. D., COLLINS,G. M. and VICTOR,M. Troubles de la m6moire et de l'apprentissage chez
l'homme: leurs relations avec des 16sions des lobes temporaux et du dienc6phale. In Physiologie de
l'Hippocampe, pp. 273-291. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1962.
 PERSISTENT ANTEROGRADEAMNESIAAFTER STAB WOUND OF THE BASAL BRAIN 281

2. BAY, E. Ein Beitrag zur Frage der traumatischen Hirnstammsch~idigung und zum Commotionsproblem.
D. Z. Nervenheilk. 149, 284-301, 1939.
3. BICKFORD,R. C., DODGE, H. W. and UHLEIN, A. Electrographic and behavioral effects related to depth
stimulation in human patients. In Electrical Studies of the Unanesthetized Brain, RAMSEY, E. R. and
O'DOHERTY, D. S. (Editors). Hoeber, New York, 1960.
4. CHAPMAN, L. F., WALKER, R. D., RAND, R. W., MARKHAM, C. H. and CRANDALL,P. H. Memory
changes induced by stimulation of hippocampus or amygdala in epilepsy patients with implanted
electrodes. Trans. Amer. neurol. Ass. 92, 50-56, 1967.
5. CORKIN, SUZANNE. Tactually-guided maze learning in man: Effects of unilateral cortical excisions
and bilateral hippocampal lesions. Neuropsychologia 3, 339-351, 1965.
6. GOTTSCHALDT,K. ~ber den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von FigureD. Psychol.
Forsch. 8, 261-317, 1926 and 12, 1-87, 1929.
7. GRANT, D. A. and BERG, ESTA. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting
to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. J. exp. Psychol. 38, 404-411, 1948.
8. HECAEN,H. and AJURIAGUERRA,J. de. MGconnaissances et Hallucinations Corporelles. Masson, Paris
1952.
9. JASPER,H. and RASMUSSEN,T. Studies of clinical and electrical responses to deep stimulation in men,
with some considerations of functional anatomy. Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. ment, Dis. 36, 316-334, 1958.
10. K1MURA,DOREEN. Right temporal-lobe damage. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 8, 264-271, 1963.
11. KRAL, A. Ein weiterer Beitrag zur K1Arung der Pathogenese und Pathophysiologie der Commotions-
psychose. Arch. Psychiat. 101, 729-738, 1934.
12. LHERMITTE,J. Visual hallucination of the self. Brit. reed. J. 1,431-434, March 3, 1951.
13. LHERMITTE,J., HECAEN, H. and COULONJOU. HGautoscopie et onirisme. Le problGme du double
dans le r~ve et dans le songe. Ann. m~d. -psychol., 100e annGe 2, 3-4, 180-182, 1942.
14. MARK, V. H. Comments in: Discussion, L. F. Chapman et al. : Memory changes induced by stimulation
of hippocampus or amygdala in epilepsy patients with implanted electrodes. Trans. Amer. neurol. Ass.
92, 53-56, 1967.
15. MENNINGER-LERCHENTHAL,E. Das Truggebilde der eigenen Gestalt: Heautoskopie, Doppelg~nger.
Abhdl. Neurol., Psychiat., u. ihren Grenzgebieten, pp. 1-195. Karger, Berlin, 1935.
16. MILNER, BRENDA. Les troubles de la mGmoire accompagnant des 16sions hippocampiques bilatGrales.
In Physiologie de l'Hippocampe, pp. 257-272. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1962.
17. MILNER, BRENDA. Visually-guided maze learning in man: Effects of bilateral hippocampal, bilateral
frontal, and unilateral cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia 3, 317-338, 1965.
18. MILNER,BRENDA. Amnesia following operation on the temporal lobes. In Amnesia, WH1TIY, C. W. M.
and ZANGWILL, O. L. (Editors), pp. 109-133. Butterworths, London, 1966.
19. MILNER, BRENDA and KIMURA, DOREEN. Dissociable visual learning defects after unilateral temporal
lobectomy in man. Paper read at East. Psychol. Ass., Philadelphia, 1964.
20. MILNER, BRENDA and PENFIELD, W. The effect of hippocampal lesions on recent memory. Trans.
Amer. neurol. Ass. 80, 42-48, 1955.
21. MILNER, BRENDA and TEUBER, H. -L. Alteration of perception and memory in man: reflections on
methods. In Analysis of Behavioral Change, Chap. l l, WEISKRANTZ, L. (Editor), pp. 268-375. Harper
and Row, New York, 1968.
22. NEWCOMBE,FREDA, OLDFIELD, R. C. and W1NGFIELD, A. Object naming by dysphasic patients. Nature
207, 1217-1218, 1965.
23. OLDFIELD, R. C. and WINGFIELD, A. Response latencies in naming objects. Quart. d. exp. Psychol.
17, 273-281, 1965.
24. OSTERmETH,P. Le test de copie d'une figure complexe. Arch. Psychol. 30, 206-356, 1944.
25. PAMPIGLIONE,G. and FALCONER,M. A. PhGnomGnes subjectifs et objectifs provoquGs par la stimulation
de l'hippocampe chez l'homme. In Physiologic de l'Hippocampe, pp. 399-410. Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1962.
26. PENFIELD, W. The Excitable Cortex in Conscious Man. The Liverpool University Press, Liverpool,
1958.
27. PENFIELD,W. and MILNER, BRENDA. Memory deficit produced by bilateral lesions in the hippocampal
zone. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 79, 475-497, 1958.
28. PENFIELD,W. and PEROT, P. The brain's record of auditory and visual experience. Brain 86, 595-696,
1963.
29. REY, A. L'examen psychologique clans les cas d'encGphalopathie traumatique. Arch. Psychol. 28,
No. 112, 1942.
30. RUSSELL,W. R. Brain, Memory, Learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959.
31. SCOVILLE,W. B. and MILNER, BRENDA. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 20, 11-21, 1957.
32. TALLAND,G . A . Deranged Memory. Academic Press, New York, 1965.
282 H.-L. TEUBER, BRENDA MILNER and H. G. VAUGHAN,JR.

33. TEUBER, H.-L. and WEINS'rEIN, S. Ability to discover hidden figures after cerebral lesions. A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 76, 369-379, 1956.
34. VIGNOLO, L. A. Factors underlying impairment of visual figure-ground discrimination and sorting
tasks in hemisphere-damaged patients. In Hemispheric Asymrnetty t~f F, nction, KtNSBOURNE, M.
(Editor). Tavistock, London, 1968 (in press).
35. WECHSLER, D. A standardised memory scale for clinical use. J. Psychol. 19, 87-95, 1945.
36. WEIGL, E. On the psychology of so-called processes of abstraction. ,1".abn. soc. Psychol. 36, 3-33, 1941,
translated by Margaret J. Rioch from Zur Psychologie sogenannter Abstraktionsprozesse, Z. Psychol.
103, 2-45, 1927.
37. WHITTV, C. W. M. and ZANGWlLL, O. L. Traumatic amnesia. In Amnesia, WHtTTY, C. W. M.
and ZANGWILL, O. L. (Editors) pp. 92-108. Butterworths, London, 1966.
38. ZANGWILL, O . L . The amnesic syndrome. In Amnesia, WHITTY, C. W. M. and ZANGWILL, O. 1,.
(Editors) pp. 77-91. Butterworths, London, 1966.

R6sum6--Un cas d'amn6sie ant6rograde est d6crit dans lequel le trouble de la m6moire
provient d'une blessure b. la base du cerveau, un fleuret ayant p6ndtr6 dans le cerveau iv
travers la narine droite pour prendre ensuite une direction ldg6rement oblique vers la gauche.
Une 6tude de ce cas poursuivie pendant 7 ans n'a r6v616 comme signe neurologique qu'une
paralysie persistante du regard vertical, ainsi qu'une amndsie antdrograde dans laquelle le
matdriel verbal 6tait plus affect6 que le mat6riel non verbal. La perception et la vigilance
6taient intactes. On ne notait ni crise, ni 6quivalent, et ~ cet 6gard cette observation diff6re
de celle de H.M., le cas princeps d'amndsie ant6rograde apr6s hippocampectomie bilatdrale
d6crit par SCOVILLEet MILNER. I1 semble que le fleuret ait, dans le case ici ddcrite, entrain6 une
Idsion de la r6gion pr6tectale. C'est pourquoi, il est d'un intdr6t tout particulier de souligner
qu'une impuissance et une absence de r6ponse ~ la douleur 6taient associ6es & l'amndsie
ant6rograde.

Zusammenfassung--Wir beschreiben einen Fall von anterograder Ananesie, in dem die

Ged/ichtnisst6rung in Folge einer Stichwunde im basalen Gehirn auftrat: ein Florett war in
das rechte Nasenloch aufw~irts und etwas schr/ig nach links eingedrungen. Nachuntersuch-
tmgen, die sich bisher auf sieben Jahre erstreckten, zeigen eine Paralyse des vertikalen Blicks
nach oben, und sonst keine anderen neurologischen Symptome, ausser dem amnestischen
Syndrom, das in diesem Fall mehr die verbalen als die nichtverbalen Ged/ichtnisleistungcn
beeintr/ichtigte. Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit waren intakt. Der Patient hatte keine
epileptischen Anf/ille oder epileptische Equivalente; in dieser Hinsicht war er anders als
H.M., der urspri.ingliche Fall yon anterograder Amnesie nach doppelseitiger Abtragung der
Ammonshornrinde, der yon Scoville und Milner beschrieben wurde, lm gegenw/irtigen
Falle schien die Stichwunde in das rostrale Mittelhirn eingedrungen zu sein. Es ist deshalb wich-
tig zu betonen dass die anterograde Amnesie mit Impotenz verbunden war, und dass der Patient
eine ganz ungew6hnliche Toleranz fiir Schmerz aufwies.