WCM 2023 3101
WCM 2023 3101
WCM 2023 3101
the cooperative
economy
REPORT 2023
Exploring
the cooperative
economy
www.monitor.coop
THE WORLD COOPERATIVE MONITOR IS AN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE INITIATIVE WITH THE SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT OF EURICSE
Supporting partners
The 2023
World Cooperative Monitor
Gianluca Salvatori
Secretary General, Euricse
Welcome to the 12th edition of the World Cooperative Monitor! of cooperative and mutual enterprises to thrive and im-
pact their communities.
The need for robust data to provide evidence of the contri-
bution cooperatives make to local communities and sus- This year’s report provides the annual rankings of the Top
tainable development is glaring. From the United Nations 300 largest cooperative and mutual enterprises and the
Secretary-General’s 2023 report on cooperatives in social rankings by sector. It also contains a focus on benefits to
development advocating for the need for evidence-based members and the way the largest cooperative and mutual
policies to support the promotion of cooperatives, to the enterprises communicate their cooperative identity and
development of indicators to demonstrate the contribution
advantage. The thematic chapter was developed in collab-
to the Sustainable Development Goals, to cooperatives
oration with the International Cooperative Entrepreneur-
and mutual enterprises making attempts to communicate
ship Think Tank (ICETT) and is the start to a deeper look
their own stories and successes. The calls for enhanced
the group will take into the benefits of being a member of
data are widespread.
a cooperative or mutual organisation.
While we still have a long road ahead and need to collect
more data from individual enterprises and overall eco- The World Cooperative Monitor team would like to thank
systems, the World Cooperative Monitor, produced by the the organisations, researchers, advisory committee
International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) with the scientific members, apex oranisations, and all those who helped
and technical support of the European Research Institute compile and check the data for this year’s edition. And a
on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (Euricse), makes a special thank you to our partners and supporters from
significant contribution – through economic data collec- ICETT! We look forward to continuing to develop this
tion and thematic analysis – to demonstrating the capacity work together.
3
INDEX WCM 2023
6 INTRODUCTION
6
REPORT 2023
Introduction
7
EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY
The World Cooperative Monitor (WCM) is a project designed to collect economic, organisa-
tional, and social data about cooperatives and mutuals worldwide. It responds to the need
to have robust data for the cooperative movement – data that shows not only the economic
importance of this business model, but also the particular impact cooperatives and mutuals
around the world have on their members and communities. The World Cooperative Monitor
raises awareness of the economic size and sustainability of cooperatives and mutuals and
gives them an opportunity to gain insights into how their sectors are performing on a global
scale. It is the only report of its kind collecting annual quantitative data on the global coop-
erative movement. The research and collaborations carried out over the last 12 years have
provided the cooperative movement with a significant tool to evaluate its own positioning
and have high¬lighted the importance of cooperation in the world to the general public and
policy makers.
2
Maintain an up-to-date database on
large cooperatives containing economic,
employee, and membership data
Provide visibility to the
movement by monitoring
and demonstrating
the impact of large
cooperatives, from both
an economic and a social
perspective
3
Respond to the knowledge needs
of large cooperatives, providing
both ad-hoc quantitative and
qualitative research on aspects
of their interest
8
REPORT 2023
The publication reports on the world’s largest cooperatives and mutuals, or groups of co-
operatives and mutuals, including rankings of the Top 300 and sectoral analysis. Each year,
the World Cooperative Monitor builds upon the research and data collection of the previous
years, continually refining and improving the methodology and data collection strategies.
The report has explored various themes over the past 12 years, from sector analysis to
capital structure to the contribution of cooperatives to sustainable development. This work
has resulted in the report being pointed to multiple times at the UN General Assembly by
Secretary General António Guterres as an important resource for demonstrating the impact
cooperatives have on resolving global challenges.
Besides the economic and employment data of the Top 300 cooperatives and mutuals at the
global level, this year’s report gives special attention to the topic of member benefits.
The focus chapter aims at analyzing the benefits that cooperatives and mutuals offer to
their members and how the cooperative identity is presented. The chapter explores the
narratives presented on the cooperatives’ and mutuals’ websites and compliments the past
chapter on the implementation of digital tools to manage participation and membership
engagement.
The thematic analyses in the World Cooperative Monitor are carried out in collaboration
with the International Cooperative Entrepreneurship Think Tank (ICETT). This collaboration
helps integrate cooperative issues of the moment with the WCM to stimulate strategic ac-
tion through best practice sharing amongst ICETT members, the top 300 cooperatives and
mutuals and the wider cooperative movement.
In addition to this collaboration, the team behind the WCM research has worked directly
with cooperatives, federations and representative bodies to collect the most accurate and
consistent data possible. National data collection initiatives help source additional and in-
depth data, helping to bring new elements to the research. The collaborations and scientific
rigor behind the research have resulted not only in the collection of robust data on the
world’s largest cooperatives and mutuals, but also in the strengthening of relationships and
cooperation among different stakeholders.
9
EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY
2021
Results
and Rankings
This section presents the results The WCM provides two different Top 3001 and sectoral rankings: one based
of the economic analysis of on turnover and the other based on the ratio of turnover over Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) per capita2. The ratio of turnover over GDP per capita meas-
the world’s largest cooperative
ures the turnover of the Top 300 cooperative and mutual enterprises in terms
organisations, cooperative of the purchasing power of an economy, relating the turnover of the enter-
groups, and mutuals. prise to the wealth of the country. It allows us to compare the relative size of
enterprises in considering different levels of national economic wealth, but
does not compute the contribution of each enterprise to the national GDP.
Rather, it measures the size of the enterprise in its national context.
In addition to economic The data collected for the 2023 edition of the World Cooperative Monitor is
data, employment data from the fiscal year 2021. The primary sources of data include annual and
sustainability reports, existing databases of economic data, data collected
and organisation type are
by national associations, research institutes, and other organisations, and
also presented for the the use of a questionnaire to collect data directly from enterprises3. Over
Top 300 where available. the last few years we have concentrated efforts on collecting turnover and
employment data through the search for annual and sustainability reports
for each organisation in the Top 300 ranking of the WCM 2023 rather than
relying primarily on external datasets. This strategy helps ensure data is
1
It should be noted that due to limited data sources, the Top 300 rankings cannot
be considered exhaustive. However, it should also be noted that based on the conso-
lidated data collection methods refined over the last eleven years, the rankings in the
WCM 2023 represent a very important part of largest cooperatives worldwide (for more
detailed information on data collection, please see the Methodology and Data sources
chapter).
2
GDP per capita data is sourced from the World Bank.
3
The complete list of data sources is in the methodology chapter.
collected using the same methodology and has contributed to the increased coverage of
employment data in the rankings. When online research (in the tables the source is la-
belled “desk research”) is incomplete, other data sources are utilized, though when multiple
sources are available, the desk research is utilized. This strategy has led to the building of
an archive of financial statements and annual reports from the last few years. The WCM
team is also supported by researchers and federations around the world that help source
and verify data – we thank everyone involved for these efforts and collaborations.
47
6
3
81.3% 15.7% 2.0% 1.0%
Desk research Existing rankings Private databases Submitted
Top 300
255
turnover/GDP
per capita
36
6 3
85.0% 12.0% 2.0% 1.0%
Desk research Existing rankings Private databases Submitted
4
It should be noted that the data sources breakdown refers only to the economic data sources, where
a priority is based on annual reports (desk research) even when an organization submits a questionnaire.
The Top 300 by turnover ranking presents an overall total of 2,409.41 billion USD for the year
2021 with most of the enterprises operating in the agricultural sector (105 enterprises) and
insurance sector (96 enterprises), followed by wholesale and retail trade (57 enterprises).
The Top 300 by turnover over GDP per capita sees the agriculture sector standing out with
103 organisations, whereas the insurance sector counts 87 enterprises, followed by whole-
sale and retail trade (56 enterprises). The financial service sector become more visible in
the turnover over GDP per capita ranking with 39 enterprises with compared to 27 enter-
prises in the Top 300 by turnover. Note that in the Top 300 rankings, the financial services
sector turnover is calculated using slightly different indicators than in the financial services
sector ranking. For a more detailed description see the methodology.
9 3
27 3.0% 1.0% 3 SECTOR LEGEND
9.0% 1.0%
Agriculture and food industries (including fishing)
Insurance
96
32.0%
8 5 2
2.7% 1.7% SECTOR LEGEND
39 0.7% Agriculture and food industries (including fishing)
13.0%
Insurance
Financial service
87
29.0%
With regards to type, the majority of enterprises in the Top 300 by turnover are produc-
er cooperatives mainly representing agricultural cooperatives and retailers’ cooperatives
(130, to which is added one producer/consumer), followed by mutuals (80) and consumer/
user cooperatives (72). 11 of the top 300 are non-cooperatives controlled by cooperatives,
while only 5 are worker cooperatives and 2 are multi-stakeholder cooperatives. The re-
sults are similar in the Top 300 based on turnover over GDP per capita, though there are
more consumer/user cooperatives than mutuals, respectively 80 and 71 organisations.
Mutual 80
26.7%
Consumer/User 72
23.7%
Worker 5
1.7%
Multistakeholder 2
0.7%
Producer+Consumer/User 1
0.3%
Consumer/User 80
26.7%
Mutual 71
23.7%
Worker 8
2.7%
Multistakeholder 2
0.7%
Producer+Consumer/User 1
0.3%
The geographical distribution of the Top 300 by turnover and the Top 300 by turnover over
GDP per capita is similar to past years, with most of the large cooperatives and mutuals
in the Top 300 rankings located in the most industrialized countries. The Top 300 by turn-
over over GDP per capita, though, has a larger number of countries, as it is not based on
absolute value.
ASIA-PACIFIC
_
Japan 21
New Zealand 5
Republic of Korea 4
Australia 3
India 3
Singapore 2
Malaysia 1
Saudi Arabia 1
Total 40
ASIA-PACIFIC
_
AMERICAS
_ Japan 23
USA 41 India 15
Brazil 21 New Zealand 5
Colombia 10 Republic of Korea 4
Canada 7 AFRICA Australia 3
Argentina 5 _
Kenya 1 Singapore 2
Costa Rica 1 Malaysia 1
Total 1
Mexico 1 Saudi Arabia 1
Uruguay 1 Total 54
Total 87
Top 300
TOTAL TURNOVER
2,409.41
BILLION US$
TURNOVER
BRACKET 50 10 | 50 5 | 10 2|5 2
(US$) BLN BLN BLN BLN BLN
ORGANISATIONS
8 46 57 112 77
2.7% 15.3% 19.0% 37.3% 25.7%
SECTOR RANKINGS
The following pages present the World Cooperative Monitor rankings by sector of activity.
The results presented in the rankings are to be considered exploratory, not exhaustive.
The methodology found on page 148 provides details concerning the data collection and
analysis; however, some key points to keep in mind regarding the rankings include:
• Comparisons among cooperatives in different sectors should be made with due cau-
tion, keeping in mind that varying economic indicators have been used for different
types of organisations (banking income for banks, premium income for insurance
cooperatives and mutuals, and turnover for other cooperatives).
• The rankings in this edition are based on data from 2021. To create the Top 300 and
sector rankings based on U.S. Dollars (USD) the 2021 average exchange rate was
utilized. Note that the conversion to USD from Local currency unit (LCU) is impacted
by the fluctuations from year to year.
FOTO
settore
Agriculture
and food industries
This section includes all cooperatives that operate along the entire agri-
cultural value chain, starting from the cultivation of agricultural products
and livestock farming to the industrial processing of agricultural products
and animals. This sector includes both agricultural producers’ coopera-
tives and consortia of cooperatives (or similar arrangements) that carry
out the processing and marketing of agricultural goods for their mem-
bers. Organisations in the fishing sector are included. Agricultural coop-
eratives exist in almost every country around the world. They are very well
represented in both developed and emerging economies and contribute
to food security and poverty reduction in different areas of the world. They
help farmers increase their returns and income by pooling their resources
to support collective arrangements and economic empowerment.
From this sector, there are 105 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 103 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
Mark Stebnicki. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Turnover 2021 Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
FOTO
settore
Industry
and utilities
This section includes cooperatives operating in industrial sectors with the
exception of the food industry as well as those whose economic activity
deals with utilities. It includes worker cooperatives in the construction
sector and users’ cooperatives in the utilities sector, that is, cooperatives
that are active in the management of infrastructure for a public service,
such as electricity, natural gas, and water. Energy and other public ser-
vices are sectors in which cooperatives are strongly motivated by ethi-
cal-cultural considerations and innovation. Often, they are committed to
“green” energy and employ a more sustainable and responsible model of
development, while providing local communities with the power to inter-
vene directly in their own futures.
From this sector, there are 9 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 5 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
Casablanca. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Turnover 2021 Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
5 7 Norlys Amba (Ex Eniig Denmark Consumer/ 1.77 Desk 2,775 Headcount
Amba) User Research
6 8 Norlys Amba (Ex Eniig Amba) Denmark Consumer/User 25,966.13 Desk Research
FOTO
settore
Wholesale
and retail trade
This section includes retailers’ cooperatives formed to purchase and sup-
ply goods and services at competitive conditions in the interest of their
members (which are classified as producer cooperatives in the coopera-
tive typology) and consumer cooperatives operating in wholesale and re-
tail activities (which are classified as consumer/user cooperatives in the
cooperative typology). As is the case with cooperatives in general, the aim
of cooperatives in this sector is not to maximize profits, but to be of use
to their members and defend their interests. The goals of cooperatives
include fostering sustainable development of local communities, promot-
ing environmental concerns and ensuring the health and safety of con-
sumers. With strength in numbers, cooperatives are able to further these
aims through their ability to purchase and supply goods and services at
competitive conditions in the interest of their members.
From this sector, there are 57 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 56 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
Tiger Lily. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Turnover 2021 Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
FOTO
settore
Insurance
This section focuses on mutual organisations and cooperatives owned
and democratically controlled by their insured customers. Insurance co-
operatives and mutuals focus on the long-term needs of their customers
and on delivering high quality products at fair prices. According to the In-
ternational Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation (ICMIF), mutual
or cooperative insurers serve more than 900 million people worldwide.
Their contribution is crucial within the social protection system, enabling
members to obtain insurance policies at more favorable conditions than
those available on the open market.
From this sector, there are 96 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 87 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
Kampus Production. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Premium Income Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 2021 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
FOTO
settore
Financial service
This section refers to cooperative banks and credit unions providing bank-
ing and financial intermediation services, democratically controlled by
member customers (borrowers and depositors). In the financial service
sector, cooperatives play a central role in supporting economic develop-
ment. Even during economic crises, cooperatives have remained more
stable than other banks, continuing to provide trustworthy financial sup-
port for their members.
From this sector, there are 27 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 39 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
Karolina Grabowska. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Banking Income Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 2021 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
FOTO
settore
Education,
health
and social work
From this sector, there are 3 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 8 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
CDC. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Turnover 2021 Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
9 9 Asmet Salud Eps Sas Colombia Consumer/ 0.60 Desk 1,718 Headcount
User Research
FOTO
settore
Other services
This section covers all cooperatives that provide services other than those
included in education, health and social work, including housing, cooper-
ative business services, communications and transportation. The cooper-
atives in this sector show the variety of sectors of activity in which cooper-
atives may operate as well as the potential areas for further development
of service-oriented cooperatives.
From this sector, there are 3 in the Top 300 based on turnover
and 2 in the Top 300 turnover over GDP per capita
Jimmy Chan. Pexels
Rank Rank Organisation Country Type Turnover 2021 Source Number of FTE or
2021 2020 (Billion US$) Employees 2021 Headcount
* in the current edition we have corrected the economic sector from wholesale and retail trade to other services
* in the current edition we have corrected the economic sector from wholesale and retail trade to other services
Cooperative
Members
Benefits
INTRODUCTION
This chapter aims to explore whether ‘hiding their cooperative identity’ is a deliberate
strategy employed by large cooperatives and mutuals and how they communicate their
cooperative identity through tangible and intangible benefits for their members.
METHODOLOGY
To provide an overview of large cooperatives and mutuals and their member benefits,
we analyzed 76 out of 81 organizations in the top10 sector rankings both by turnover
and by turnover over GDP per capita from the World Cooperative Monitor 20221. Data
1
The organizations that were no longer active, nor longer cooperative, or on liquidation have been
excluded from the analysis.
Texts related to how the cooperative or mutual presents itself in terms of ‘cooperative
identity (or as a mutual)’ were gathered from sections such as ‘About us’, ‘Our organiza-
tion’, ‘Mission’ and ‘Mission and values’. Information on member participation and bene-
fits was sought in sections like ‘Members’, ‘Membership’, ‘Become a member’, and ‘Join
us’ or, when unavailable, in the organization’s Ethical Code. The sample is composed of 76
organizations, varying in size, location and economic sector (Appendix 1 and 2).
The collected data underwent conceptual coding, focusing on two primary categories:
cooperative identity and member benefits. The coded texts were systematically organized
to delineate a conceptual framework, subsequently employed for a comparative analysis
of the cases across various sectors and types.
COOPERATIVE IDENTITY
More than 80 per cent of the analyzed cooperatives and mutuals explicitly state their iden-
tity as a cooperative or a mutual insurance, often specifying sectors and organizational
forms2. Over half of the examined entities explicitly declare the values and principles of
cooperativism and mutualism on their websites. The ‘About us’ section is commonly utilized
to reinforce the strong connection between organization identity and cooperative values and
principles. Some organizations (17%) have dedicated sections listing all ICA cooperatives’
2
“Cooperative financial group”, “cooperative and mutual bank”, “a meaningful cooperative”, “not-for-
profit generation and transmission cooperative”, “cooperative insurer”, “cooperative company”, “mutual
company”, “movement of cooperatives of retailers”, “labour cooperative”, “cooperative association”, “mu-
tual manufacturing and working cooperative company”, “consortium of cooperatives”, “independent and
not-for-profit electric distribution cooperatives”, “an electric generation and transmission cooperative”, “a
global agribusiness cooperative”
values and principles with brief explanations. Propensity exists to highlight organizational
type and governance form, using words like ‘community’, ‘people’, ‘transparency’ to express
pride in being a cooperative or mutual. For example, Coop Italia defines itself as “a compa-
ny, a movement of people and a collective subject based on a cooperative”.
The historical aspect serves as another avenue for showcasing the identity or origin
of cooperatives and mutuals. In cases where the current large and complex structures
might not explicitly state their identity as cooperatives and mutuals due to their intricate
organizational forms, they often refer to their historical origin as a cooperative or mutual
insurance3. Given that many large cooperatives have a long history marked by mergers,
renaming, and the creation of various brands and subsidiaries, a considerable number of
them allocate a dedicated section on their website to narrate their history.
The ways of conducting business that cooperatives and mutuals claim reflect their
identity. Expressions related to relational dimensions are often used; they ‘work together’
and ‘connect people’, form ‘partnerships’ and ‘coalitions’ with external stakeholders, and
‘pool resources’ to best meet members’ needs. They “build a value chain that benefits
members and the local community (Sicredi)”. The enhanced relationships among mem-
bers and with external partners allows cooperatives and mutuals to “create an environ-
ment of mutual understanding, respect and trust (Raiffeisen Bank International)”. Unlike
investor-owned companies, cooperatives view money as a tool and don’t divide profits to
enrich capital investors but “accumulate resources to invest for the benefit of the commu-
nity and in anticipation of future challenges (Coop Italia)”. Surpluses are “reinvested for
the benefit of members, users, service quality and technology innovation, thus ensuring
cooperative’s sustainability (Fundación Espriu)”.
Some cooperatives and mutuals (37%) present their structure, emphasizing that they
are ‘established’, ‘owned’, ‘governed’ and ‘managed’ by members. Northwestern mutu-
3
“We were founded more than two hundred years ago from the conviction that you are stronger togeth-
er than alone (Achmea)”, “Our roots date back to 1927 when 17 purchasing cooperatives decided to join
forces with the goal of collectively organising the purchase of food (REWE Group)”
al, for example, states that “we don’t have shareholders, so instead of reporting to Wall
Street, we report to our policyowners”. This member-based structure is seen as “a key
strength that keeps them focus on their missions (Assoc. Electric Coop. Inc.)”. Some sec-
ond or third-level cooperatives describe their structures more in detail, clarifying their
relationship with member-cooperatives to which individual user-members belong4. Be-
yond a mere statement, they explain how they operate as a cooperative or mutual, placing
members at the “heart of everything they do” (Navy Federal Credit Union). They ‘serve’,
‘help’, ‘empower’, ‘strengthen’, ‘stand for’ their members and “give them the support
they need to ensure they are ready for the future (Mouvement Desjardins)”. They ‘focus
on’ and ‘meet’ members’ needs and ‘make decisions based on members’ needs’. They
also “bring value to members (Navy Federal Credit Union)” and “add value to members’
activities (Coamo)”.
Members are not just clients; they ‘own’ their cooperatives and must ‘act responsibly’,
‘contribute to’ and ‘give dynamism to’ their cooperatives’ development. Members are ex-
pected to be normative and ethical actors who “attach to democratic and solidarity values,
desire to participate in the development of social progress (ACDLEC Leclerc)”, and “are
driven by a commitment to solidarity (Corporación Mondragón)”. Fonterra Cooperative
describe their members as “good people who work together to do good things with dairy,
good things with the land we work on and good things for the people that our products
end up with”.
Sometimes, cooperatives and mutuals indirectly explain their identity by describing spe-
4
“Organized into three operational levels that link individual cooperatives, central cooperatives and
the Sicoob Cooperative Center (Sicoob)”, “our customers are 38 of Georgia’s electric membership corpo-
rations (Oglethorpe Power Corporation)”, “the national-level financial institution for agricultural, fishery
and forestry cooperatives (The Norinchukin bank)”, “a three-tiered structure with the dairy cooperative
societies at the village level federated under a milk union at the district level and a federation of member
unions at the state level (Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd (AMUL))”, “owned by and
delivers power to eight distribution cooperatives (Central Electric Power Coop.)”, “a parent company of the
Iccrea Cooperative Banking Group (Gruppo Bancario Cooperativo Iccrea)”
cific natures5 or using the term ‘cooperative model’, emphasizing their dynamics rather
than organizational structures. Emphasis on ‘cooperation’, ‘mutual aid’ and ‘mutuality’ is
another way to describe their identity, and to some extent, the expression of a ‘collective
path’ or ‘collective approach’ describes the collective dimension of cooperatives. Beyond
core business activities, some cooperatives describe their cooperative activities, aligning
them with cooperative principles and values6.
MEMBER BENEFITS
While being a member of a cooperative or mutual involves having a say in decision-making
for the organization, members gain access to much more than just decision-making power.
To comprehend the motivations behind becoming a member, it is crucial to examine what
and how cooperatives and mutuals offer to their members (Birchall & Simmons, 2004).
Member benefits can be broadly categorized into tangible and material aspects (services
and products, economic advantages) and intangible aspects (participation, contribution
to the community). Understanding the characteristics of the members is essential as it
influences the type of benefits that the organization addresses and offers. Additionally,
the economic sector is relevant when analyzing member benefits; and thus, the analysis
of the collected data considered these two aspects.
Primarily, cooperatives and mutuals extend benefits to their members through their
business activities. Depending on their economic activities, they outline various services
5
“Consumer governed nonprofit health care organization (HealthPartners Inc.)”, “cooperatively owned
energy and telecommunications group (Norlys Amba)”
6
“Devoted to the promotion and development of cooperative healthcare (Fundación Espriu)”, “promote
the economic, technological, social, educational and cultural development of its members (Coamo)”, “act
in accord with the fundamental definitions, values and principles of cooperative union activities (National
Federation Of Agricultural Cooperative Associations - ZEN-NOH)”, “creating value in a competitive and su-
stainable way … keeping up the differential cooperative principles and values (Asociación de Cooperativas
Argentinas)”
and products. While most primary cooperatives and mutuals provide detailed information
on the ‘quality’ of services and products for members and clients who are direct users
or consumers, second or third-level cooperatives specify how they support their mem-
ber-cooperatives. This highlights the advantage of the cooperative model, allowing local
cooperatives to benefit from economies of scale through networks, unions, consortia or
federations. In some cases, second or third-level cooperatives take a coordinating role,
presenting themselves as a unified business entity under the same brand or group name.
A specific mechanism for cooperative members’ economic benefit is ‘patronage (or re-
bates)’. Interestingly, while worker cooperatives use this concept very clearly, other types of
cooperatives sometimes use the term ‘dividend’ in a confusing way. Some use ‘dividends’
to explain the distributed surplus based on transactions that members made with their
cooperative, while others use it to indicate the distributed surplus (or profit) on members’
share capital. Financial cooperatives typically use the term ‘dividends’ or ‘profit dividends’.
Members’ participation is not only a fundamental aspect of the cooperative model but
also an important member benefit in itself. Members join cooperatives and mutuals not
only to use services and products but also to ‘share a joint project’. They participate in the
democratic governance structure by electing or being elected as members of the board
of directors and/or other leadership entities. They are also involved in controlling and
monitoring daily cooperative businesses through various structures. For instance, worker
cooperatives and employee-owned enterprises allow worker-members (partners for em-
ployee-owned enterprises) to join various committees, coordinating various workplace is-
sues and other cultural and social matters. For primary cooperatives operating at the na-
tional level, complementary systems for members’ participation, such as local members’
council (Rabobank, Coop Swiss, Co-operative Group Limited, Friesland Campania), board
of representatives (Arla Foods), thematic work commissions (Conad), are developed.
In addition to these primary benefits, analyzed cooperatives and mutuals provide various
other forms of member benefits, such as cooperative education programs, provision of in-
formation, and representation (more noticeable in second and third level of cooperatives).
While this analysis does not delve into how large cooperatives and mutuals express their
community benefits, it is essential to note that the analyzed cases emphasize their role in
enabling members to directly and/or indirectly contribute to various projects for the com-
munity, society, and the planet. As consumers’ ethical commitments evolve, the commu-
nity benefits made by cooperatives and mutuals should be considered a key benefit for
members who want to participate in societal transformation through their cooperatives
and mutuals.
CONCLUSION
In contrast to some critics, this chapter demonstrates that large cooperatives and mutu-
als do explicitly convey their identity as cooperatives or mutuals, albeit to varying degrees
and that the soul of cooperativism and mutuality is firmly presented to the public. They
employ diverse elements, including direct statements, historical narratives, structures,
business practices and descriptions of their cooperative nature, to elucidate their coop-
erative identity. Additionally, they highlight various member benefits, both tangible and
intangible, which vary according to the specific type of cooperative.
It is crucial to note that this research is grounded in information available on the websites
of the analyzed cooperatives and mutuals. Consequently, it should be recognized as an
examination of intentional communication strategies adopted by these entities. The arti-
cle sheds light on the aspects that may be considered to construct more comprehensive
and compelling arguments for members and the public. However, the true impact will be
realized through the concrete manifestation of these arguments in their organizational
structures, day-to-day practices, and the people involved, including leaders, members,
and employees. Further steps may involve the exchanges of best practices among large
cooperatives and mutuals and the development of reporting or evaluation tools to gauge
the implementation of these strategies more effectively.
REFERENCES
Birchall, J., & Simmons, R. (2004). “The Involvement of Members in the Governance of Large-Scale Co-op-
erative and Mutual Businesses. A Formative Evaluation of the Co-operative Group”, Review of So-
cial Economy, 62(4), 487-515.
DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W. (1983). “The iron case revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective ratio-
nality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-60.
ICA (2023). What We Know about Our Cooperative Identity. Results of 2022 Survey. June, 2023. Brussels.
https://www.ica.coop/sites/default/files/2023-09/What%20we%20know%20about%20our%20
coop%20identity_EN.pdf
The International Cooperative Entrepreneurship Think Tank (ICETT) is a Think Tank of the ICA,
which was created in 2018 to foster cooperation among large cooperatives and cooperative
groups and create a platform for peer-to-peer learning on how to leverage their cooperative
identity and boost their entrepreneurial performance. As the ICETT is focusing on “Coopera-
tives’ benefits” as its main thematic area for 2023-2024 working cycle, ICETT members are
shaping the analysis of cooperative benefits to the members and the community based on
concrete examples from their own experiences and come up with recommendations that ICA
members and cooperatives around the world could use to evaluate their cooperative benefits
and enhance their impact in the society. Following, two cases are selected from those shared
at the last ICETT Plenary meeting in Brussels on November, 28th-29th 2023.
NCG provides the capacity of a chain while maintaining the autonomy of each individual
co-op. It helps unify retail food co-ops in order to optimize operational and marketing
resources, strengthen purchasing power, and ultimately offer more value to food co-op
owners and shoppers everywhere. NCG exists to maximize members’ success, inclusivity,
and impact, and to grow the cooperative grocery sector in size and scope in an envi-
ronmentally regenerative manner. It offers a variety of purchasing, management, devel-
opment and marketing services, and facilitates direct co-op-to-co-op support and peer
networking. NCG also advocates on behalf of co-ops on a number of issues, prioritized by
their owners. While not a chain, NCG does seek to provide food co-ops with many of the
advantages that large chain stores enjoy, while still enabling them to reflect the unique
qualities of their local communities. Membership in NCG is voluntary, as is participation
in NCG’s programs and services. Learn more about participating in NCG.
IFFCO
The Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited, also known as IFFCO, is a multi-state
cooperative society headquartered in New Delhi, India. IFFCO is wholly owned by 35,565
cooperative societies of India and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and mar-
keting of fertilizers. The membership of IFFCO is open to all cooperative societies from
primary/village level to state and national cooperatives who become member voluntarily
and contributed willingly to the share capital of IFFCO.
IFFCO is aligned with a sustainable future for farmers and it endeavors to provide solu-
tions to the challenge of growth with sustainability. IFFCO’s approach has been to offer
solutions that are adapted to suit local conditions and context. From being a foodgrain-de-
pendent nation to a foodgrain surplus one, it has contributed to fertilizers, in every nook
and corner of the country. It has also undertaken alternative measures for the conser-
vation and protection of the environment through Neem plantation. Through its member
cooperatives, IFFCO has established a comprehensive farmer support framework that
provides assistance to farmers both on the field and off the field. This is being achieved
through various initiatives taken by IFFCO and its associates. Learn more about IFFCO
and its activities here: https://www.iffco.in/en/corporate.
EUROPE
_
Italy 8
AMERICAS France 7
_
USA 13 Germany 5
Brazil 5 WORLD: 76 ORGANIZATIONS Denmark 3
Colombia 2 Netherlands 3
Argentina 1 Spain 2
Canada 1 Sweden 2
Total 22 Switzerland 2
UK 2
Austria 1
Norway 1
Poland 1
Total 37
ASIA-PACIFIC
_
Japan 10
India 4
New Zealand 1
AFRICA Korea, Rep. 1
_
Kenya 1 Total 16
Total 1
APPENDIX 2 NUMBER OF THE ORGANIZATIONS PER ECONOMIC SECTOR AND TYPE, 2023
76 ORGANIZATIONS
29 23 11 8 5
Top
rankings
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Nonghyup (National
4 9 Agricultural Cooperative Asia and Pacific Republic of Korea 61.17 Submitted
Federation - NACF)
Cooperative Financial
6 3 Europe Germany 59.82 Desk Research
Network Germany - BVR
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
National Federation Of
14 4 Agricultural Cooperative Asia and Pacific Japan 38.91 Desk Research
Associations - ZEN-NOH
19 19 Meiji Yasuda Life Asia and Pacific Japan 25.60 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
37 38 Fonterra Cooperative Group Asia and Pacific New Zealand 14.92 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
53 41 The Norinchukin bank Asia and Pacific Japan 11.56 Desk Research
Associated Wholesale
54 51 Americas USA 10.81 Desk Research
Grocers, Inc
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Federated Co-operatives
75 81 Americas Canada 7.23 Desk Research
Limited FCL
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Deutsches Milchkontor Eg
89 74 Europe Germany 6.47 Desk Research
(DMK)
Sanacorp Eg
92 94 Europe Germany 6.22 Desk Research
Pharmazeutische
Gruppo Bancario
95 96 Europe Italy 6.05 Desk Research
Cooperativo Iccrea
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
101 92 Fukoku Life Asia and Pacific Japan 5.76 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Asociación de
116 125 CooperativasArgentinas Americas Argentina 4.67 Desk Research
ACA
125 122 Securian Financial Group Americas USA 4.12 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
129 115 Co-op Mirai Asia and Pacific Japan 3.98 Desk Research
HanseMerkur
131 151 Europe Germany 3.95 Desk Research
Versicherungsgruppe
134 158 Recreational Equipment Inc. Americas USA 3.74 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
140 132 Eureden (ex Triskalia) Europe France 3.67 CoopFR - agri
143 130 Asahi Life Asia and Pacific Japan 3.60 Desk Research
145 190 Prairie Farms Dairy Inc. Americas USA 3.56 NCB
150 148 NTUC Income Asia and Pacific Singapore 3.43 Desk Research
Wawanesa Mutual
152 145 Americas Canada 3.29 Desk Research
Insurance Co
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Consumer/User
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
154 199 Coop Agroindustrial LAR Americas Brazil 3.23 Desk Research
Cooperativa Agroindustrial
155 272 Dos Produtores Rurais Do Americas Brazil 3.23 Desk Research
Sudoeste Goiano - COMIGO
162 153 Gruppo Cassa Centrale Europe Italy 3.06 Desk Research
Fuer Sie
166 157 Handelsgenossenschaft Eg Europe Germany 2.99 Desk Research
Food - Non Food
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
169 155 Cooperl Arc Atlantique Europe France 2.90 CoopFR - agri
171 170 Zespri Asia and Pacific New Zealand 2.85 Desk Research
176 150 Co-op Sapporo Asia and Pacific Japan 2.80 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
180 179 Tawuniya Asia and Pacific Saudi Arabia 2.72 Desk Research
184 198 Basin Electric Power Coop. Americas USA 2.63 NCB
186 - Aichiken Keizai Nogyo KR Asia and Pacific Japan 2.61 Desk Research
Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale
188 185 Europe Germany 2.59 Desk Research
Rhein-Main
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Consumer/User
Insurance Mutual
Utilities Consumer/User
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
196 196 Foodstuffs South Island Asia and Pacific New Zealand 2.34 Desk Research
198 192 Les Maîtres Laitiers Europe France 2.33 CoopFR - agri
AGTEGRA Cooperative/
199 255 South Dakota Wheat Americas USA 2.32 NCB
Growers Association
Central Valley Ag
203 250 Americas USA 2.25 Desk Research
Cooperative
204 166 Co-op Kobe Asia and Pacific Japan 2.25 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Consumer/User
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
207 178 Shinkin Central Bank Asia and Pacific Japan 2.17 Desk Research
Banco Credicoop
210 296 Americas Argentina 2.14 Desk Research
Cooperativo Limitado
217 204 Coop Nederland U.A. Europe Netherlands 2.07 Desk Research
218 232 Select Milk Producers, Inc. Americas USA 2.04 NCB
220 207 EMC Insurance Companies Americas USA 2.03 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Consumer/User
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Volkswohl-Bund
221 219 Europe Germany 2.02 Desk Research
Versicherungen
226 251 Capricorn Society Asia and Pacific Australia 1.95 CEMI
227 236 Silver Fern Farms Asia and Pacific New Zealand 1.94 Desk Research
228 278 Grupo Cooperativo Cajamar Europe Spain 1.90 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
236 279 Kribhco Asia and Pacific India 1.79 Desk Research
238 216 U Co-op Asia and Pacific Japan 1.75 Desk Research
Cocamar Cooperativa
245 - Americas Brazil 1.68 Desk Research
Agroindustrial
Intergamma Cooperatief
246 242 Europe Netherlands 1.68 Desk Research
U.A.
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
249 258 West Bend Mutual Americas USA 1.64 Desk Research
Spółdzielnia Mleczarska
252 260 Europe Poland 1.61 Desk Research
Mlekovita
Oglethorpe Power
253 264 Americas USA 1.60 Desk Research
Corporation
Independent Pharmacy
256 235 Americas USA 1.59 NCB
Coop.
259 238 Blue Diamond Growers Americas USA 1.57 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Producers Livestock
272 295 Americas USA 1.48 NCB
Marketing
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
Insurance Mutual
Utilities Consumer/User
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Coopercitrus Cooperativa
278 - Americas Brazil 1.43 Desk Research
De Produtores Rurais
283 271 Tri-State G&T Association Americas USA 1.40 Desk Research
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Insurance Mutual
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER (IN US DOLLARS)
Unione Farmaceutica
293 276 Europe Italy 1.34 Aida
Novarese
Spółdzielnia Mleczarska
300 - Europe Poland 1.32 Desk Research
Mlekpol W Grajewie
Number of Date
Economic Activity Type FTE or Headcount Source Employee Data
Employees 2021 d/m/y
Utilities Consumer/User
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
40 35 The Kerala State Co-operative Bank Ltd Asia and Pacific India
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
103 90 Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad Asia and Pacific Malaysia
105 107 Kokumin Kyosai co-op - Zenrosai Asia and Pacific Japan
110 109 Sollio Cooperative Group (La Coop fédérée) Americas Canada
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
142 138 Karnataka State Cooperative Apex Banks Ltd Asia and Pacific India
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
145 145 The Cosmos Cooperative Bank Ltd Asia and Pacific India
151 132 The SVC Bank Ltd Asia and Pacific India
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
165 195 Madhya Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd Asia and Pacific India
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
182 175 The TJS Bank Ltd Asia and Pacific India
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
206 204 Foodstuffs North Island Limited Asia and Pacific New Zealand
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
220 212 Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Bank Asia and Pacific India
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
227 203 Gujarat State Cooperative Bank Ltd Asia and Pacific India
229 248 Co-operative Bulk Handling (CBH Group) Asia and Pacific Australia
235 221 Foodstuffs South Island Asia and Pacific New Zealand
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
249 217 NTUC Fairprice Co-Operative Ltd Asia and Pacific Singapore
254 265 Hospital Contribution Fund (HCF) Asia and Pacific Australia
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
258 273 The Kyoei Fire & Marine Insurance Co Asia and Pacific Japan
259 269 Silver Fern Farms Asia and Pacific New Zealand
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
TOP 300 LARGEST COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL ORGANISATIONS BY TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA
Turnover/GDP
Economic Activity Type Source
per capita 2021
Methodology
and Data Sources
The methodology for the World The World Cooperative Monitor project intends to pursue three goals:
Cooperative Monitor is briefly 1. provide visibility to the movement by monitoring and demonstrating the
described below. A summary of impact of large cooperatives, from both an economic and a social per-
spective;
the population under study, data
collection, rankings, and method- 2. maintain an up-to-date database on large cooperatives containing eco-
nomic, employee, and membership data;
ological issues is provided5.
3. respond to the knowledge needs of large cooperatives, providing both
ad-hoc quantitative and qualitative research on aspects of their interest.
WHO IS SURVEYED
The project collects data on large cooperative enterprises and aggrega-
tions of cooperatives, mutual, and non-cooperative enterprises in which
cooperatives have a controlling interest.
The project focuses on units that carry out economic activity for the pro-
duction of goods or services for their members. Cooperative unions and
federations that mainly carry out lobbying, representation, and protection
of the interests of associated cooperatives are not covered by the project.
cated and challenging. Moreover, cooperatives that enter the top 300 classification of the
WCM, given their size, are real giants from an economic point of view and therefore their
structure is in most cases very complex and branched. On this point a continuous exercise
of refinement over the years, is leading to a continuous improvement of the data collected.
Classifications
The project classifies the cooperative organisations by economic activity and coopera-
tive type (International Labour Organisation, 2018). Information on the economic activity
or industrial sector of each organisation is collected and classified into ten categories
(see full methodology), each of which mainly reflects the structure of ICA sectoral or-
ganisations. The classification into the ten categories is determined by the International
Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) or regional and national
equivalents class, in which the activity of the cooperative is included. If a cooperative com-
bines two or more economic activities, the main economic activity is identified following
international methods and standards6.
In the sector rankings, some economic activities are combined to form more general sec-
tors, as described in the rankings paragraph. Units are also classified based on the main
interest of their members (Table 1). In the cases of cooperatives with members’ interest
different from those proposed in Table 1, they will be analysed case by case. Mutuals and
non-cooperative enterprises are classified as such.
6
The principal activity of the unit in general can usually be determined from the goods that it sells or ships
or the services that it renders to other units or consumers. […] Ideally, the principal activity of the unit
should be determined with reference to the value added to the goods and services produced. The relevant
valuation concept is gross value added at basic prices, defined as the difference between output at basic
prices and intermediate consumption at purchaser’s prices.” (UN 2008, p. 20).
Indicators
The project collects primarily economic data, along with data, where possible, on work
generated, calculated using the total head count at the balance sheet year-end date, but
also taking into account the data of Full-time equivalents or average data of the employed
for the year in case data on head count are not available.
Annual turnover data is collected for the all the entities. In the case of a cooperative
group, the consolidated data is taken into account. If the consolidated data is not availa-
ble, if possible the turnover of the entities that make up the group are considered, exclud-
ing the amount of value resulting from operations within the group, meaning operations
among members of the group.
Producer cooperatives The main interest of the members is related to their production activity as enterprises in their
own right. The members typically comprise household market enterprises such as small
agricultural or craft producers but may also include corporations.
Worker cooperatives Members share an interest in the work which is provided by or ensured through the cooperative.
The members are individual workers (worker-members) whose jobs are directly assured
through their cooperative.
Consumer/User coops Members are the consumers or users of the goods or services made available by or through the
cooperative. Financial service cooperatives are classified as part of consumer/user cooperatives
even if these cooperatives also service producers.
Multi-stakeholder coops A cooperative which has more than one type of member with significant involvement in the
activity of the cooperative and in which: (i) more than one type of member is represented in the
governance structure of the cooperative; and (ii) no type of member has a dominant position
through a majority of votes in the governing body or an exclusive veto over decisions.
The present report refers to data from the fiscal year 2021. For all the economic and oc-
cupational data, the account closing date is 31 March, which means that data for accounts
with closing dates between 01/04/2021 and 31/03/2022 is considered as representing eco-
nomic activity in year 2021.
Economic data is collected in the local currency and then converted into USD. The average
monthly 2021 exchange rate was utilized. Note that the conversion to USD from Local
currency unit (LCU) is impacted by the fluctuations from year to year. Economic data is re-
ported in billion (1 billion = 1,000,000,000). The absolute values are rounded to the second
decimal place and percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
Rankings
In the rankings tables, in addition to the Top 300 rankings, a list of the largest coopera-
tives in each individual sector is presented. The rankings presented are based on turnover
data, defined as the income generated by the business activities conducted by a compa-
ny, usually the sales of goods and services to customers. In the case of the Insurance
sector, this is premium income. For the Financial Service sector, this is the sum of net
interest income, net premiums and other operating income, such as deposit and payment
service charges, lending fees and credit card service revenues, income from brokerage
and investment fund services, management and custodial service fees, foreign exchange
income as well as other income. However, this value was used solely for the Financial
Service ranking. In the Top 300 ranking, to achieve a more homogeneous comparison, the
sum of interest income, non-interest income (income from banking services and sources
other than interest-bearing assets) and premium income (if the organisation also pro-
vides insurance services) was utilized for financial service organisations. This methodol-
ogy creates the most homogeneity possible among data sources but note that there could
be variations among countries and existing rankings regarding calculations and values
used. When available, the number of employees is also listed.
In addition to rankings based on turnover, a Top 300 ranking based on the ratio of turno-
ver over gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is also presented. The purpose of this
FIGURE 1. ECONOMIC DATA SOURCES ranking is to neutralize the differences between the different countries
2023 WORLD COOPERATIVE MONITOR due to differences in purchasing power and therefore the different cost
DATABASE of living that differentiates the individual countries: this allows a greater
comparison of turnover.
Some of the economic activities described above are grouped into sectors
for the sector rankings: fishing is included in the agriculture and food in-
57.8% dustries sector, industry and utilities are grouped together, as are housing
and other services.
Existing
rankings
Data sources
Also, with regard to the employment data, the working group has used
0.9%
various sources, such as online research, the questionnaire completed by
Private
database the organisation, data collected from lists at the national level and data
collected in databases.
0.3%
The direct involvement of federations and cooperatives is essential to en-
Submitted
suring good coverage in different areas of the world. For this reason, ICA
promotes the creation of national monitors which, following the method-
ology of the international project, collect data on the largest cooperatives
* It should be noted that the data sources break-
active in the country.
down refers only to the economic data sources,
where a priority is based on annual reports (desk
research) even when an organization submits a
questionnaire. Considering the total question-
naires received (also containing employment data)
the percentage would be 5% of the total database.
USA
US Credit Unions with turnover
above 100 million USD - published
by Callahan & Associates, Inc.
BRAZIL
Rankings, 2020 OCB database -
published by Organização
das Cooperativas do Brasil
published lists, (OCB)
UK
Co-operative Economy 2022 above 10 million GPB - published by Co-operatives UK (CoopUK)
DENMARK
2020 Kooperationen database - published by Kooperationen
SWEDEN
Det kooperativa sverige – De största företagen 2021
above 10 milion SEK - published by Svensk Kooperation
FINLAND
Finnish 300+ 2020-2021 - published by Pellervo Society (Pellervo)
NETHERLANDS
Nederlandse Coöoperatie Top 100 (2019) -
published by Nationale Raad voor de Coöperatie (NCR)
BELGIUM
Staessens, M., Dufays, F., & Billiet, A. (2021).
Belgian Cooperative Monitor 2021. Cera:
Leuven. Gegevens ophalen Integreren - JAPAN
published by CERA/KU Leuven 2021-2022 JCCU database
- published by Japanese
ITALY Consumers’ Co-operative
2021 Aida database - published by Aida - Bureau Union (JCCU)
Van-Dijk database (Aida)
FRANCE
Agricultural cooperatives 2021 - published by Coop de France (CoopFR - agri)
Les 100 plus grandes entreprises coopératives françaises - édition 2022 -
published by Coop de France (CoopFR)
SPAIN
Las empresas más relevantes de la economía social
2021-2022 - published by Confederación Empresarial
Española de la Economía Social (CEPES)
Team,
advisory committee,
organisational partners
TEAM
CHIARA CARINI PAOLA DELVECCHIO
Euricse Euricse
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ICA AFRICA INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL INSURANCE
FEDERATION
ICA ASIA-PACIFIC ICMIF
PROMOTERS
The mission of the European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises
is to promote knowledge development and innovation for the field of cooperatives, social
enterprises and other non-profit organisations engaged in the production of goods and
services. The Institute aims to deepen the understanding of these types of organisations
and their impact on economic and social development, furthering their growth and assist-
ing them to work more effectively. Through activities directed toward and in partnership
with both the scholarly community and practitioners, including primarily theoretical and
applied research and training, we address issues of national and international interest to
this sector, favouring openness and collaboration.
ORGANISATIONAL PARTNERS
Made possible by the support of our organisational partners
Banco Credicoop
It was established in 1979. Today, it is the Argentina’s eleventh-largest bank by total as-
sets and ninth largest by deposits (US$2.8 billion); nearly all of this is accounted for by
its over 670,000 members, and Credicoop maintains 244 branches. It is also a lender in a
country where domestic credit is difficult to access, holding a net loan portfolio of US$1.7
billion (3.5% of the domestic total).
IFFCO Ltd
In 1967, the Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co-operative Limited (IFFCO) was established by
an initiative of NCBA/CLUSA in collaboration with ACDI/VOCA for the welfare of India’s
farmers. Today, IFFCO is the world’s Largest Fertiliser Cooperative, growing from an as-
sociation of just 57 cooperatives in 1967, to 35,300 cooperatives at present. IFFCO is an
autonomous cooperative i.e. wholly owned by Cooperative Members. All its initiatives are
aimed to benefit its member’s i.e. farmers.
Kibbutz Movement
The Kibbutz (Hebrew word for “gathering”) Movement is the largest settlement movement
in Israel. It was re-organized in 1999 as a merger between two Kibbutz organisations and
includes 257 members (kibbutzim). The kibbutz is a multi-purpose cooperative, binding
together community, housing, and production means. The majority of kibbutzim are rural
communities, based on principles of joint ownership, equality and cooperation in produc-
tion, consumption and education, providing mutual aid to their members.
Midcounties Cooperative
The Midcounties Co-operative is the largest independent consumer cooperative in the UK,
with over 700,000 members. It operates a range of businesses in Food, Travel, Healthcare,
Funeral, Childcare, Energy, Post Offices, Flexible Benefits and Telecoms. It was formed
in 2005, by the merger of the Oxford, Swindon and Gloucester Co-operative Society and
the West Midlands Co-operative Society. The Midcounties Co-operative generates annual
gross sales of over £1bn, has over 400 Trading Sites, 8,000 colleagues and over 700,000
members. It focuses on enabling their members to influence, connect and co-operate in
joint activities that benefit their Society, their members and their communities.
Mondragon Corporation
MONDRAGON groups 98 cooperatives located mainly in the Basque Autonomous Region
of Spain, and in their majority SMEs. It is the largest business group in the Basque Auton-
omous Region and the tenth in Spain. Its origins go back to 1956, when the first industrial
worker cooperative was established in Mondragon, then a very small Basque town. It is a
cross-sectoral group organised into four major areas: industry, distribution, finance and
knowledge. Its mission combines the basic objectives of a business organisation compet-
ing in international markets with the use of democratic and participatory governance, job
creation, human and professional promotion of its workers and commitment to social and
economic development of its territory.
Rabobank
The first local Rabobank was established in 1895. Nowadays, Rabobank Group consists of
89 local Rabobanks, Rabobank Nederland (APEX) and domestic and foreign subsidiaries.
Rabobank has 1.9 million members who are customers of local Rabobanks. The com-
mon thread since Rabobank’s inception is to offer financial solutions for economic needs
and social issues. In practice, Rabobank has frequently reoriented its strategy, business
model and governance structure in anticipation of or in response to shifting trends in
society, technology, competition, banking regulation and supervision, etcetera. Being a
cooperative, profit maximalisation has never been our overriding purpose, but profits are
necessary for meeting capital requirements, continuity and the pursuit of our social goals.
S-Group
S Group is a Finnish network of consumer cooperatives operating in the retail and service
sectors, mainly in Finland but also in Estonia and in Russia. S Group comprises 19 regional
cooperatives and SOK Corporation along with its subsidiaries. SOK Corporation was founded
in 1904 and it`s owned by the regional cooperatives. Today by turnover, S Group is the big-
gest cooperative group in Finland. S Group’s key business areas are the supermarket trade,
department stores, specialty stores, the hardware trade, service station store and fuel sales,
and the travel industry and hospitality business. In addition, S-Bank offers banking services
to cooperative members. Individual cooperatives conduct also automotive trade and services.
Smart
Established in 1998 as non-profit association specialised in offering economic activity and
contract management services, insurance services, legal and consulting services, infor-
mation and training, co-workspaces, and mutual financial tools mainly to artists, Smart
Belgium was converted into a cooperative in 2016 and has a French and Belgian manage-
ment. More recently it has opened itself to freelancers of all sectors of activities. Smart
Belgium has organised a process for converting itself into a multi- stakeholder cooper-
ative (workers, clients, partners, service providers etc.). Smart has disseminated to an-
other 8 European countries through similar cooperatives, with a total of 85,000 members.
Up Coop
Founded in 1964 as a consumer cooperative, it became a worker cooperative in 1972. It
designs and markets products and services that facilitate access to food, culture, recrea-
tion, education, home help, and social assistance but also accompanies companies in the
management of their professional expenses or in the animation of stimulation and fidelity
devices. It offers a wide range of titles and services for companies, works councils, com-
munities and individuals. The group is also present in the software solutions market for
personal services structures. Present in 19 countries on all continents, the Up Coop works
for more than 24.5 million customers and is the world number three in lunch vouchers.
CREDITS
Attribution 3.0
you are free to share and to remix, you must attribute the work
Contents
Euricse and ICA research team
Graphic Design
Roberto Nova, BigFiveVisual.com
164
anniversary REPORT 2023
edition
165
Exploring
the cooperative
economy
www.monitor.coop
monitor@monitor.coop