Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Groupmates-Rubric-Rating Cuevas

    Uploaded by

    Naughty or Nice
    Rubric

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Groupmates-Rubric-Rating Cuevas

    Uploaded by

    Naughty or Nice
    2 views4 pages
    Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Rubric

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    2 views4 pages

    Groupmates-Rubric-Rating Cuevas

    Uploaded by

    Naughty or Nice
    Rubric

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Categories and Criteria

    1. Participation and Engagement (5 points)

    5: Always participates actively in discussions and group work. Consistently brings ideas, suggestions, and constructive fee
    4: Frequently participates in discussions and group work. Often brings ideas and suggestions, with occasional constructiv
    3: Occasionally participates in discussions and group work. Sometimes brings ideas and suggestions but rarely provides fe
    2: Rarely participates in discussions or group work. Seldom brings ideas or suggestions, with minimal feedback.
    1: Does not participate in discussions or group work. Provides no ideas, suggestions, or feedback.

    2. Quality of Work (5 points)

    5 points: Delivers work of exceptional quality that exceeds expectations. Demonstrates thorough research, accuracy, and
    4 points: Delivers high-quality work that meets expectations. Demonstrates good research, accuracy, and attention to de
    3 points: Delivers acceptable work that meets basic requirements. Demonstrates adequate research and some attention
    2 points: Delivers work that often requires revisions. Demonstrates minimal research and lacks attention to detail.
    1 points: Delivers poor quality work that does not meet requirements. Demonstrates little to no research and lacks accur

    3. Dependability and Responsibility (5 points)

    5 points: Always reliable and responsible. Completes tasks on time and keeps commitments.
    4 points: Mostly reliable and responsible. Usually completes tasks on time and keeps commitments.
    3 points: Sometimes reliable and responsible. Occasionally misses deadlines or commitments.
    2 points: Rarely reliable and responsible. Often misses deadlines or commitments.
    1 points: Unreliable and irresponsible. Frequently misses deadlines and fails to keep commitments.

    4. Team Collaboration (5 points)

    5 points: Consistently works well with team members. Actively supports others and facilitates group cohesion.
    4 points: Often works well with team members. Generally supports others and contributes to group cohesion.
    3 points: Sometimes works well with team members. Occasionally supports others but does not always contribute to gro
    2 points: Rarely works well with team members. Provides minimal support and can disrupt group cohesion.
    1 points: Does not work well with team members. Often creates conflict and disrupts group cohesion.

    5. Initiative and Leadership (5 points)

    5 points: Always takes initiative and demonstrates leadership. Proactively identifies and solves problems, and motivates
    4 points: Often takes initiative and shows leadership. Frequently identifies problems and contributes to solutions.
    3 points: Sometimes takes initiative and shows leadership. Occasionally identifies problems and suggests solutions.
    2 points: Rarely takes initiative or shows leadership. Seldom identifies problems or offers solutions.
    1 points: Never takes initiative or shows leadership. Does not identify problems or offer solutions.

    Participation Quality of Dependability Team Initiative


    and Work (5 and Collaboration (5 and
    Name Engagement (5 points) Responsibility (5 points) Leadership
    points) points) (5 points)
    Leader:
    Cuevas, Justin 5 5 5 5 5
    Members:
    Abad, Ben 5 5 5 5 5
    Cabuay, Reynaldo Jr. 4 4 5 4 4
    Locsin, Kyle Marie 5 5 4 5 5
    Villasis, Jasthine Dahnica 5 5 5 5 5
    tions, and constructive feedback.
    ith occasional constructive feedback.
    tions but rarely provides feedback.
    nimal feedback.

    gh research, accuracy, and attention to detail.


    uracy, and attention to detail.
    earch and some attention to detail.
    attention to detail.
    o research and lacks accuracy.

    roup cohesion.
    roup cohesion.
    t always contribute to group cohesion.
    up cohesion.

    problems, and motivates the team.


    butes to solutions.
    d suggests solutions.

    Total (25
    points)
    25

    25
    21
    24
    25

    You might also like