Figure 2-1 Flowchart For ECC Applications
Figure 2-1 Flowchart For ECC Applications
Figure 2-1. Flowchart for ECC Applications for PEIS, EIS, PEPRMP & EPRMP
PEIS For EMB CO Applications for Group I (ECP in ECA or NECA) Projects For EMB RO Applications for Group II (NECP in ECA) Projects EIS PEPRMP EPRMP
Scoping
Social Preparation/IEC
1.1
Information, Education & Communication (IEC) of LGUs with jurisdiction over the project area is a required Proponent-driven activity, used as a basis for identification of stakeholders & issues in preparation for Public Scoping. Prior to IEC, tentative impact areas need to be determined by the Proponent, guidelines for which are provided in Annex 2-2. Stakeholders can then be identified with LGU assistance, using the pro-forma guideline/form in Annex 2-3. The actual LGU IEC activities and outcome can be summarized using Annex 2-4. (NOTE: Projects in
national waters outside any LGU jurisdiction are not covered by the IEC requirement for Scoping purposes.)
1.2
1.2
Scoping is a required activity for PEIS & EIS-based projects. The Proponent submits to the EMB five (5) sets of Pro-forma Letter of Request for Scoping (Annex 2-5), attaching the Pro-forma Project Description for Scoping (Annex 2-6), with supporting docs: a) Filled out EIA Coverage & Requirements Screening Checklist (Annex 2-1), b) Map
& Description of Preliminary Impact Areas, per Annex 2-2, c) Stakeholder ID Form (Annex 2-3), d) Summary IEC documentation (Annex 2-4), and e) Filled out scoping portion of the appropriate EIA Scoping/Procedural Screening Checklist (SPSC), available for EIS (Annexes 2-7a) & for EPRMP (Annex 2-7b). (NOTE: Attachments c & d are not required for projects in national waters outside any LGU jurisdiction.)
1.3
Review Team Formation, Scheduling of Three-Level Scoping Activity Conduct of Three-Level Scoping Activity:
a) 1st Level: Project Briefing Meeting with Review Team, b) 2 Level: Public Scoping with Community & c) 3rd Level: Technical Scoping with Review Team
nd
1.3
1.4
1.4
Within five (5) working days from receipt of letter-request, EMB forms the prospective Review Team. Annex 2-8 presents criteria/guidelines for selection of EIARC and Resource Persons. In coordination with the Proponent , EMB confirms the date and venue of the Three-Level Scoping Activity. The Review Team consists of an EMB Case Handler, third party EIARC members and/or Resource Person/s. The Three-Level Scoping Activity is a Proponent-driven activity, preferably done one-time on site or in the region of project location. a) Project Briefing with Review Team (RT) , during which Proponent presents a project overview, key issues & proposed TOR of EIA
Study. Based on the pre-filled out SPSC, the RT may initially raise key issues on the scope of EIA Study, subject to Public/Technical Scoping. b) Public Scoping with project stakeholders, during which community sectors raise their issues to be addressed in the EIA Study. A Pro-forma Public Scoping Program/Guidelines is presented in Annex 2-9 to guide Proponent in preparations and proper conduct of scoping. A Pro-forma Listing of Community Issues is provided in Annex 2-7c for sign-off by key scoping participants as an input to the Technical Scoping. (NOTE: Public Scoping not required for P/EPRMP & for projects in national waters outside of any LGU jurisdiction).
1.5
1.5
c) Technical Scoping with Review Team, during which the EIA SPSC presented by the Proponent during Project Briefing is reviewed, finalized and signed by the RT and the Proponent. The RT is also referred to Annexes 2-7d & e for Environmental Risk Categorization & ERA format/coverage, and to Annex 2-10 for guidance on segregation of other government requirements from the EIA scope. The EMB Chief reviews and approves the EIA SPSC, rendering official the final TOR of the EIA Study.
24
THIS STEP IS WHOLLY WITHIN THE PROPONENTS CONTROL. Proponent undertakes the EIA Study, with the assistance of its EIA Preparer Team. DENR-EMB personnel may clarify procedural and technical
2.0
matters on the EIA process but is not allowed to take part in the EIA Study or in the preparation of the report. Outline/Content of EIA Reports for PEIS, EIS,
2.0
PEPRMP & EPRMP are presented in Annexes 2-11 to 2-14. Annexes 2-17 to 2-20 are forms for the preparation of the Impacts Management Plan (IMP), Social Development Plan (SDP) Framework, Information, Education & Communication (IEC) Framework & Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP). Annexes 2-21 & 2-22 are Pro-forma Sworn
Statements of Accountability of Proponent and Preparers for attachment in the EIA Report.
3.0 3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
Proponent submits one (1) copy of EIA Report, and filled-out Procedural Screening portion of the SPSC( Annex 2-7a). Within three (3) days from receipt of the EIA Report, the Screening Officer validates the procedural screening by the Proponent. Non-conforming document will be returned. If conforming, Proponent will be notified of the acceptance by being furnished a copy of the validated procedural screening portion of the SPSC duly signed by the Screening Officer. Proponent will also be instructed to pay the filing fee, set up the Review Fund, and then show the receipt to the EMB Case Handler to initiate the processing of the document. The Review Fund is estimated by the EIAMD and signed off by the EIAMD Chief. A MOA is then entered into by the Proponent with the DENR-EMB Fund Manager . Annex 2-23 presents the guidelines for setting up the Review Fund. # OF COPIES OF EIA REPORT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED
PEIS
10 Hard + 1 CD
EIS
7 Hard + 1 CD
PEPRMP
5 Hard + 1 CD
EPRMP
5 Hard + 1 CD
4.0
Substantive Review
Reconvening of Review Team (RT) & Distribution of EIA Report copies to RT members
ESTIMATED WORKDAYS for EMB TO DISTRIBUTE EIA REPORTS & to FORMALLY RECONVENE EIARC
PEIS CO 20 RO 5 CO 10 EIS RO 5 PEPRMP CO RO 10 5 CO 10 EPRMP RO 5
4.1
The EMB convenes the EIA Review Committee and Resource Person thru a formal invitation/contract. 2-4 EIARC members are ideally invited. EIARC individually reviews EIA Report and fills up the Pro-forma Additional Information (AI) Request (Annex 2-24) for submission before or during the 1st RT Meeting. Annex 2-24 provides supplementing guidelines for requesting AIs while Annex 2-25 provides review criteria & guidance to the Review Team on the conduct of review meetings.
25
4.2
4.2
PEIS CO 100
4.2.1
*Note: The Review Proper duration is inclusive of a maximum of two (2) Additional Information (AIs) (except for RO AIs, responses for which are outside the EMB review timeline), maximum of 3 Review Team meetings, Site Visits/Public Hearing/Public Consultation, and submission of EIARC Report & Review Process Report of the EMB Case Handler. EMB can pre-select the EIARC Chair; otherwise, the EIARC members 4.2.1 can select its Chair. EIARC members submit their AI Forms for internal discussion among EIARC members, then with the Proponent and subsequent consolidation by the EIARC Chair for submission to the EMB within 5 days from the meeting day. Note that If there is Public Hearing, Public Consultation or Site Visit, Proponent will be asked to respond to the AI after these activities. Annex 2-25 presents a prescribed program for EIARC Meetings, roles/responsibilities/ authorities of the Review Team with supplementing criteria and guidance on the conduct of review & evaluation.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DURING REVIEW PROPER
4.2.2
4.2.2
PEIS
EIS Conditional (Can be waived if project is in national waters/ w/out LGU jurisdiction, no mounting opposition AND no valid written request for PH) SV/Public Consultation is a MUST (if no PH)
PEPRMP
EPRMP
PH*
MUST
none
none
SV SV SV must *Note: PH can only be held at the earliest on the 23rd calendar day from the 1st day of publication of Notice of Public Hearing. Annex 2-26 is a Pro-forma Notice of Public Hearing. Publication is once a week for 2 consecutive weeks, with the PH held at least 15 days from the 2nd date of publication. There are no similar restrictions to SV and PC. Annex 2-27 presents a Pro-forma Public Hearing Program with supplementing criteria/guidelines on the conduct of public hearings/consultations. Timelines of PH/PC/SV are included in the Review Proper duration. SV/PC
4.2.3
4.2.3
1st AI 2nd AI
NO. OF WORKDAYS FOR SUBMISSION OF RESPONSE* BY PROPONENT FOR EVERY AI PEIS EIS PEPRMP EPRMP CO RO CO RO CO RO CO RO 20 15 15 15 15 15 15 7 20 15 15 15 15 15 15 7
*NOTE #1: Responses must include response to issues raised by the stakeholders and EIARC during the site visit, public hearing or consultation . NOTE #2: For ALL PEIS/EIS/PEPRMP/EPRMP Reports processed at the EMB RO, response periods by Proponent are outside the EMB-controlled review timeframe.
NOTE #3: NON-SUBMISSION OF THE AI WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIMEFRAME WOULD MEAN STOPPAGE OF THE REVIEW PROCESS & AUTOMATIC RETURN OF EIA REPORT TO THE PROPONENT, WHO IS GIVEN ONE (1) YR TO RESUBMIT WTHOUT HAVING TO PAY PROCESSING & OTHER FEES.
26
4.2.4
4.2.4
4.2.5
4.2.5
The EIARC Report shall be submitted by the EIARC Chair at the latest within five (5) days from the last EIARC meeting. When applicable, concerned EIARC members shall submit inputs to the EIARC Report at the latest within two (2) days from the last EIARC meeting. Annex 228 provides a pro-forma EIARC Report outline /content. EIARC Report Preparation is included in the Review Proper duration. The RPR/Recommendation Document shall be prepared and submitted by the EMB CH to the EIAMD Review Section Chief/EIAMDivision Chief at the latest within five (5) days from receipt of the EIARC Report. Annex 2-29 provides an outline of the RPR. Annex 2-30a presents the standard ECC format and content. The EIARC Chair signs Annex B of the ECC which relays relevant EIA Findings & Recommendations to the Proponent on issues within the EMB/DENR mandate and those within the jurisdiction of other concerned GAs/LGUs. The RPR and its approval as well as clearance on Decision Document for release to Endorsing Authority are included in the Review Proper duration. ESTIMATED WORKDAYS for EMB TO ENDORSE RECOMMENDATION
5.0
Endorsement of Recommendation
5.0
PEIS CO RO 30 10
Endorsing Authority
EIS PEPRMP EPRMP CO RO CO RO CO RO 15 10 15 10 15 5 CO: EMB Chief/EMB Director RO: EMB Chief
6.0
6.0
ESTIMATED WORKDAYS TO SIGN-OFF & ISSUE DECISION DOCUMENT PEIS EIS PEPRMP EPRMP CO RO CO RO CO RO CO RO
Deciding 30 10 15 10 15 10 15 5 Authority NOTE #1: If no decision is made within the specified timeframe, the ECC application is deemed automatically approved and the approving authority shall issue the ECC within five (5) working days after the prescribed processing timeframe has lapsed. NOTE #2: Prior to the release of the ECC, Proponent shall submit to the EMB one (1) hard copy and 2 e-files of the FINAL EIA REPORT, integrating all AIs. NOTE #3: The Proponent signs the Sworn Statement of Full Responsibility on ECC Conditions prior to the official release of the ECC. EMB transmits thru Annex 2-30b the ECC to concerned GAs and LGUs with mandate on the project for integration of recommendations into their decision-making process.
7.0
7.0
27