Load Calculation Example
Load Calculation Example
Load Calculation Example
A single-family detached house with floor plan shown in Figure 1 is located in Atlanta, GA, USA.
Construction characteristics are documented in Table 17. Using the RLF method, find the block
(whole-house) design cooling and heating loads. A furnace/air- conditioner forced-air system is
planned with a well-sealed and well-insulated (R-8 wrap) attic duct system.
Solution
Design
Conditions. Table 18 summarizes design conditions. Typical indoor conditions are assumed.
Table 2 Typical Fenestration Characteristics
Operable fixed
Vinyl/Aluminum
Vinyl/Aluminum
Aluminum with
Fiberglass/Vinyl
Aluminum with
Fiberglass/Vinyl
Thermal Break
Thermal Break
Clad Wood
Clad Wood
Reinforced
Reinforced
Wood/Vinyl
Insulated
Insulated
Wood/Vinyl
Aluminum
Aluminum
Glazing Type Layers IDb Propertyc,d center of Glazing
Clear 1 1a U 5.91 7.24 6.12 5.14 5.05 4.61 6.42 6.07 5.55 5.55 5.35
SHGC 0.86 0.75 0.75 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.78 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.75
2 5a U 2.73 4.62 3.42 3.00 2.87 5.83 3.61 3.22 2.86 2.84 2.72
SHGC 0.76 0.67 0.67 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.69 0.67 0.67 0.67
3 29a U 1.76 3.80 2.60 2.25 2.19 1.91 2.76 2.39 2.05 2.01 1.93
SHGC 0.68 0.60 0.60 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.60 0.60
Low-e, low-solar 2 25a U 1.70 3.83 2.68 2.33 2.21 1.89 2.75 2.36 2.03 2.01 1.90
SHGC 0.41 0.37 0.37 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.36 0.36
3 40c U 1.02 3.22 2.07 1.76 1.71 1.45 2.13 1.76 1.44 1.40 1.33
SHGC 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24
Low-e, high-solar 2 17c U 1.99 4.05 2.89 2.52 2.39 2.07 2.99 2.60 2.26 2.24 2.13
SHGC 0.70 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.64 0.64 0.61 0.61 0.61
3 32c U 1.42 3.54 2.36 2.02 1.97 1.70 2.47 2.10 1.77 1.73 1.66
SHGC 0.62 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.56 0.56 0.54 0.54 0.54
Heat-absorbing 1 1c U 5.91 7.24 6.12 5.14 5.05 4.61 6.42 6.07 5.55 5.55 5.35
SHGC 0.73 0.64 0.64 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.66 0.66 0.64 0.64 0.64
2 5c U 2.73 4.62 3.42 3.00 2.87 2.53 3.61 3.22 2.86 2.84 2.72
SHGC 0.62 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.56 0.56 0.54 0.54 0.54
3 29c U 1.76 3.80 2.60 2.25 2.19 1.91 2.76 2.39 2.05 2.01 1.93
SHGC 0.34 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30
Reflective 1 1l U 5.91 7.24 6.12 5.14 5.05 4.61 6.42 6.07 5.55 5.55 5.35
SHGC 0.31 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27
2 5p U 2.73 4.62 3.42 3.00 2.87 2.53 3.61 3.22 2.86 2.84 2.72
SHGC 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.26
3 29c U 1.76 3.80 2.60 2.25 2.19 1.91 2.76 2.39 2.05 2.01 1.93
SHGC 0.34 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30
2.5 0.10 0.095 0.086 0.077 0.069 0.060 0.031 0.035 0.040
Attic C 1.26 0.71 0.63 0.68 0.33 0.27 1.02 0.66 0.60 0.53 0.29 0.25
H/F 0.49 0.29 0.25 0.34 0.16 0.13 0.41 0.26 0.24 0.27 0.14 0.12
H/HP 0.56 0.37 0.34 0.34 0.19 0.16 0.49 0.35 0.33 0.28 0.17 0.15
Basement C 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04
H/F 0.28 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.10 0.08 0.24 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.09 0.08
H/HP 0.23 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.09 0.08 0.20 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.07
Crawlspace C 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.05
H/F 0.49 0.29 0.25 0.34 0.16 0.13 0.41 0.26 0.24 0.27 0.14 0.12
H/HP 0.56 0.37 0.34 0.34 0.19 0.16 0.49 0.35 0.33 0.28 0.17 0.15
Table 7 Opaque Surface Cooling Factor Coefficients
Surface type OFt OFb, K OFr
Ceiling or wall adjacent to vented attic 0.62 14.3roof – 4.5 –0.19
latitude
Exposure 20° 25° 30° 35° 40° 45° 50° 55° 60°
Southeast/Southwest ED 299 355 407 455 499 540 577 610 299
None 1.0
Exposure 20° 25° 30° 35° 40° 45° 50° 55° 60°
North 2.8 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.8
East/West 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8
Southeast/Southwest 2.1 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1
South 20.0 14.0 6.9 4.7 3.3 2.7 2.1 1.7 1.4
Clear (1a) 0.64 0.71 0.45 0.64 0.34 0.44 0.74 0.66
1
Heat absorbing (1c) 0.68 0.72 0.50 0.67 0.40 0.49 0.76 0.69
Clear (5a) 0.72 0.81 0.57 0.76 0.48 0.55 0.82 0.74
Low-e high-solar
0.76 0.86 0.64 0.82 0.57 0.62 0.86 0.79
(17c)
2
Low-e low-solar
0.79 0.88 0.68 0.85 0.60 0.66 0.88 0.82
(25a)
Heat absorbing (5c) 0.73 0.82 0.59 0.77 0.51 0.58 0.83 0.76
Floor Slab on grade with heavy carpet over rubber pad; R-0.9 edge Rcvr = 0.21 (m2·K)/W
insulation to 1 m below grade
Fp = 85 W/(m2·K)
Windows Low-e/low-solar in wood frames. Half fixed, half operable with Fixed: U = 2.01 W/( m2·K); SHGC =
insect screens (except living room picture window, which is 0.36
fixed). 0.6 m eave overhang on east and west with eave edge at Operable: U = 2.21 W/( m2·K) SHGC =
same height as top of glazing for all windows. Allow for typical 0.31
closed-weave light drape interior shading, half closed. Tx = 0.64
IACcl = 0.68
Aul = 1.4 cm2/m2
Construction Good
Window Factors.
Deriving cooling factors for windows requires identifying all unique glazing
configurations in the house. Equation (8) input items indicate that the variations
for this case are exposure, window height (with overhang shading), and frame
type (which determines U-factor, SHGC, and the presence of insect screen). CF
derivation for all configurations is summarized in Table 21.
CF𝑓𝑒𝑛 = 𝑈(Δ𝑡 − 0.46DR) + PXI × SHGC × IAC × FF𝑠 (8)
For example, CF for operable 1 m high windows facing west (the second row in Table 21)
is derived as follows:
• U-factor and SHGC are found in Table 2.
• Each operable window is equipped with an insect screen. From Table 11, Tx = 0.64 for
this arrangement.
• Overhang shading is evaluated with Equation (9). For west exposure and latitude 34°,
Table 12 shows SLF = 1.1. Overhang depth (Doh) is 0.6 m and the window-overhang
distance (Xoh) is 0 m. With window height h of 0.9 m, Fs = 0.73 (73% shaded).
SLF×𝐷𝑜ℎ −𝑋𝑜ℎ
𝐹𝑠ℎ𝑑 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [1, 𝑚𝑎𝑥 (0, )] (9)
ℎ
• PXI depends on peak irradiance and shading. Approximating site latitude as 35°N,
Table 10 shows ED = 570 and Ed = 164 W/m2 for west exposure. Equation (10) combines
these values with Tx and Fs to find
PXI = 𝑇𝑥 [𝐸𝑑 + (1 − 𝐹𝑠ℎ𝑑 )𝐸𝐷 ] (10)
𝑃𝑋𝐼 = 0.64[164 + (1 – 0.73)570] = 203 𝑊/𝑚2 .
• All windows are assumed to have some sort of interior shading in the half-
closed position. Use Equation (11) with Fcl = 0.5 and IACcl = 0.68 (per Table 17) to
derive
IAC = 1 + 𝐹𝑐𝑙 (IAC𝑐𝑙 − 1) (11)
IAC =0.84
• FFs is taken from Table 13 for west exposure.
• Finally, inserting the preceding values into Equation (8) gives
CF = 2.21(9.1 – 0.46 × 9.3) + 203 × 0.31 × 0.84 × 0.56 = 40.3 W/𝑚2
CFslab = 1.9 − 1.4ℎ𝑠𝑟𝑓 (12) CF𝑜𝑝𝑞 = 𝑈(OF𝑡 Δ𝑡 + OF𝑏 + OF𝑟 DR) (13)
Table 20 House Opaque Surface Factors
U, W/ (m2 ·K) or Heating Cooling
Component Fp, W/(m·K) HF Reference OFt OF OFr CF Reference
b
Ceiling 0.18 4.14 Equation (34) 0.62 7.66 –0.19 2.08 Table 7 Equation (13)
Wall 0.51 11.73 1 8.20 –0.36 7.09
Garage wall 0.51 11.73 1 0.00 –0.36 2.93
Door 2.3 52.90 1 8.20 –0.36 32.0
9
Floor perimeter 0.85 19.55 Chapter 18, Equation
(42)
Floor area 1.9 –1.4/(0.21 + 0.12) = 4.24 –2.34 Equation (12)
عل
مصطف سعيد ي
ي
Total 590
Summer air conditioning system for Atlanta’s building
(reference example)
Data:
𝑡𝑅 = 24∘ C , 𝑅𝐻 = 50% , 𝑡0 = 33∘ C 𝑑𝑃 , 𝑡0 = 23.2∘ C Wb
𝑄𝑆 = 4096 W , 𝑄𝐿 = 752 W
𝑡𝑆 = 14∘ C , ˙ 0 = 0.3𝑚
𝑚 ˙𝑎
𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ∶
ℎ𝑅 = 47.8 kJ/kg
ℎ0 = 68.9 kJ/kg
𝑚˙ 0 = 0.3𝑚
˙𝑎 , 𝑚˙ 𝑅 = 0.7𝑚
˙𝑎
𝑄𝑡 = 𝑄𝑆 + 𝑄𝐿 = 4848w
𝑄𝑆
𝑅𝑆𝐻𝐹 = = 0.84
𝑄𝑆 +𝑄𝐿
𝑚
˙ 0 ℎ0 + 𝑚
˙ 𝑅 ℎ𝑅 = 𝑚
˙ 𝑎 ℎ𝑚
0.3 ∗ 𝑚
˙ 𝑎 ∗ 68.9 + 0.7𝑚
˙ 𝑎 ∗ 47.8
=𝑚 ˙ 𝑎 ∗ ℎ𝑚
ℎ𝑚 = 54.13 kJ/kg
𝜔𝑚 = 10.3 g/𝑘𝑔𝑑𝑎
ℎ𝑠 = 35 kJ/𝑘𝑔
˙ 𝑎 (ℎ𝑅 − ℎ𝑠 )
𝑄𝑡 = 𝑚
0.11
1.11 12.5 1.11
= ∗ 0.07 ∗ 3.8 ∗ 100 ∗ 0.05 [( ) − 1 ] = 1681 𝑊
0.11 3.8
𝑊. 𝐷 1681
𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 = = = 1977.5 𝑊
Ƞ𝑚𝑒𝑐ℎ 0.85
𝑅. 𝐶 7.27 ∗ 103
𝐶. 𝑂. 𝑃 = = = 3.8
𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 1977.5
Summer air conditioning system for the university building
Data:
𝑡𝑅 = 24∘ C , 𝑅𝐻 = 50% , 𝑡0 = 39∘ C 𝑑𝑃 , 𝑡0 = 24∘ C Wb
𝑄𝑆 = 590 KW , 𝑄𝐿 = 56 KW
𝑡𝑆 = 14∘ C , ˙ 0 = 0.5𝑚
𝑚 ˙𝑎
𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ∶
ℎ𝑅 = 47.8 kJ/kg
ℎ0 = 72 kJ/kg
𝑚˙ 0 = 0.5𝑚
˙𝑎 , 𝑚˙ 𝑅 = 0.5𝑚
˙𝑎
𝑄𝑡 = 𝑄𝑆 + 𝑄𝐿 = 646 KW
𝑄𝑆
𝑅𝑆𝐻𝐹 = = 0.91
𝑄𝑆 +𝑄𝐿
𝑚
˙ 0 ℎ0 + 𝑚
˙ 𝑅 ℎ𝑅 = 𝑚
˙ 𝑎 ℎ𝑚
0.5 ∗ 𝑚
˙ 𝑎 ∗ 72 + 0.5 ∗ 𝑚
˙ 𝑎 ∗ 47.8
=𝑚 ˙ 𝑎 ∗ ℎ𝑚
ℎ𝑚 = 59.9 kJ/kg
𝜔𝑚 = 10.8 g/𝑘𝑔𝑑𝑎
ℎ𝑠 = 33.5 kJ/𝑘𝑔
˙ 𝑎 (ℎ𝑅 − ℎ𝑠 )
𝑄𝑡 = 𝑚
0.11
1.11 12.9 1.11
= ∗ 11.39 ∗ 1.5 ∗ 100 ∗ 0.1125 ∗ [( ) − 1 ] = 460.99 𝐾𝑊
0.11 1.5
𝑊. 𝐷 460.99
𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 = = = 542.34 𝐾𝑊
Ƞ𝑚𝑒𝑐ℎ 0.85
𝑅. 𝐶 1332.41
𝐶. 𝑂. 𝑃 = = = 2.46
𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 542.34
Appliances Volt Watts (AC) hr/day day/week Watts hrs
Light Lamps 12 19865 14 6 238380
TV 12 1200 10 6 10285