IRYN - Oct 18
IRYN - Oct 18
IRYN - Oct 18
8. A scientist is rational
9. A scientist is willing to suspend judgment until he is sure of
his results
http://jessicawebber.hubpages.com/hub/Scientific-Attitudes-that-are-Qualities-of-Scientists
What attitudes do scientists manifest when engaged in an inquiry or investigation? Below are list of
scientific attitudes that are qualities of scientists:
Beliefs. A scientist believes that everything that happens in this world has a cause or reason.
Curiosity. A scientist shows interest and pays particular attentions to objects or events. He asks
questions and seeks answers.
Objectivity. A scientist is objective if he does not allow his feelings and biases to influence his
recording of observations, interpretation of data, and formulation of conclusions.
Open-mindedness. A scientist listens to and respects the ideas of others. He accepts criticism and
changes his mind if reliable evidence contrdicts his believes.
Risk-taking. A scientist expresses his opinions and tries new ideas even at the risk of failure or
criticism.
Intellectual honesty. A scientist gives a truthful report of observations. He does not withhold
important information just to please himself or others.
Humility. A scientist is humble when he admits that he is not free from commiting errors. He
recognizes that there may be better ideas and realizes that there are individuals whom he may have
to consult to arrive at correct observations and conclusions.
Responsibility. A scientist actively participates in a task and also dutifully performs tasks assigned to
him.
Collect It!
By S.D. Powellhttp://www.education.com/reference/article/intellectual-development-middle-school/
We should be aware of the varied manifestations of intellectual development in the classroom and of
the issues they present to the teacher. This awareness leads us to seek ways we can assist in this
important growth process.
Issue #1- The attention span of middle level students may not be as great as it was in late elementary
school or will be in high school
This issue has profound implications for instruction. Expecting a middle level student to sit through a
20-minute lecture, much less a 45-minute one, and gain a great deal of knowledge is ludicrous. We
may be able to entertain students for that length of time, but their attention will wander and learning
will be hit or miss at best. In Chapters 7 and 8, we will explore instructional strategies intended to
hold attention for appropriate lengths of time. Breaking up blocks of time into manageable segments
is a technique that should be mastered by middle level teachers.
Issue #2- Middle level students often have very vivid imaginations which can be linked to concepts as
abstract thinking develops
The imaginations of children provide one of the greatest sources of pleasure afforded to humans.
When this imagination can be purposefully channeled into learning experiences, the combination
conjures up creativity that has not been possible before. Students are now capable of problem solving
in creative ways that lead to their own discoveries. Encouraging students to use their imaginations
and creativity to discover nuances and possibilities rather than simply to be fed information, helps
them to take advantage of this imagination-meets-abstract-thinking stage of life.
Issue #3- Because intellectual development is so variable among middle level students, a group of 25
seventh graders may represent a whole spectrum of levels of development
This is one of the biggest challenges of middle level education. The question is, “How do we facilitate
the learning of a prescribed curriculum, that is, state and national standards, in a classroom filled with
students who are at very different places in development?” As teachers, we must be observers,
constantly monitoring what’s working and what isn’t, and for which students at which times. One size
does not fit all!
Issue #4- As the shift from concrete to abstract thinking is ongoing, it is possible to lose opportunities
to challenge middle level students
Observation is the key to this issue as we adjust and readjust our presentations, activities, and
assignments to keep up with changes in development. We must watch closely and listen carefully to
our students. Kellough and Kellough (1999) present a list of capacities gained through the shift into
abstract thinking. Among them are:
Insight into the sources of previously unquestioned attitudes, behaviors, and values
We need to vary our instructional approaches to make the most of these possibilities.
Issue #6- A major shift in the intellectual development of middle level students is their newly acquired
ability to think about their own thinking, or to experience metacognition
We “miss the boat” when it comes to helping students take charge of their own learning by failing to
ask them to reflect on their learning processes. Knowles and Brown (2000) tell us that the emerging
possibilities to think about thinking may be a source of frustration for students. They may become
confused about their ability to be reflective. We can help them explore how their thinking takes place
and what happens inside and outside the classroom that increases comprehension and makes
learning specific skills easier and faster.
Issue #7- Middle level students begin to understand what is meaningful and useful, with application to
their lives
This intellectual development has major implications for what we teach, or the curriculum. Framing
our lessons in the context of real life makes learning a more natural process of satisfying intellectual
curiosity that arises from this sense of purpose and usefulness.
Heather R. Theijsmeijer
Email: cascaed@astro.utoronto.ca
http://www.cascaeducation.ca/files/proAstro_payattention.html
It seems as though every new generation of teachers is shocked to see how “poorly” the current
generation of students pays attention. Whether it is taking the time to read instructions carefully, or
even just sit and listen to a talk without fidgeting or dozing, many teachers quickly become
exasperated with their students in class. Is this truly becoming more and more of a problem with the
younger students? Have students genuinely changed their learning habits over time? Or are we just
remembering our learning habits through rose-coloured glasses??
Certainly, by taking a look at how current educational television shows are geared toward younger
students, we can get a glimpse into how the younger generation learns. Take Bill Nye: “The Science
Guy,” for example. Personally, I find Bill Nye episodes hard to follow – quick cuts to different scenes,
bright colours, yelling, many different characters, crazy camera angles and loud sound effects all tend
to leave me with a headache.
However my high-school aged students love the show. It holds their attention, and repeats material in
so many different ways (and at different volumes!) that they can easily absorb the content throughout
the entire show. My chalk-and-talk lessons don’t seem to engage them nearly so much.
The immediate conclusion one might jump to, is that the current generation of students have shorter
attention spans, particularly when it comes to visual or oral learning. Current post-secondary students
have grown up having everything at their fingertips, thanks primarily to the pervasiveness of the
Internet. An answer (though not necessarily the correct one) can be found to nearly any imaginable
question within 30 seconds of typing a few choice words into a search engine. Students are not used
to waiting for answers, be they answers which are eventually provided for them, or answers they
need to discover themselves.
While the fact that student learning patterns are changing may be an easy argument for some, even
before the age of the Internet, many adult learners have been known to have shorter attention spans
than recognized by teachers. Studies have been done which show that the average adult attention
span is only 15-20 minutes long. Considering that a typical lecture is 3-4 times this length, and
regardless of the conditions in which our students grew up, no wonder many doze off or lose interest
part way through a lesson!
It would seem we all need a little bit of Bill Nye-like stimulus in order to keep our students engaged
and interested in our material. Apart from jumping up and down on the front lecture bench and
yelling, however, there are a number of techniques you can use to hold the attention of your students
throughout the class, particularly taking advantage of this 15-minute attention span.
• Break up your lecture into 15-20 minute mini-lectures, separated by either something active for
your students to do (trying an example on their own, or reviewing a concept with the student beside
them), OR by something completely different and off-topic (see below). These breaks only need to be
2-5 minutes long, in order to refresh the attention span before going back to the lecture topic.
• Most students recall the most information from the first 5 minutes of the lecture. Introduce your
talk with the most important information, and then come back to those points throughout the talk.
Repetition is an excellent way to reinforce concepts.
• When problem solving, use a scaffolded approach. Instead of asking students to simply come up
with the answer, instruct them how to proceed with each step (determine this, then determine that,
which will allow you to calculate this…). Throughout the lesson you can remove parts of the “scaffold”
to help them become more independent once they know the correct method.
• Throw something completely random into your presentation: a joke, cartoon, video, newspaper
article, photo, “Did You Know,” etc. It does not have to be related to your material! This activates
their brain in a different way and helps them re-start their attention span.
• Present material in a variety of ways and repeat material using those different ways in a lecture –
visual, oral, demonstration, video, clickers, etc. Get them to use different parts of their brain
throughout the talk.
• Part way through the talk (ideally at around 20 minutes), review what has been discussed so far,
perhaps by using one of the above approaches. This reinforces what has been learned as well as gets
the students ready for a new attention span.
• Add a little variety to your lessons by not following the same outline every day. For example,
don’t show a picture of your dog every day, 45 minutes into the lecture. Change the order of things to
keep your lectures fresh.
Addressing the concept of shorter attention spans in your lectures will help both the Internet-
dependent generation, as well as the average adult learners in your courses, including giving talks to
peers at colloquia or conferences.
Local
By Rainier Allan Ronda (The Philippine Star) Updated September 24, 2011 12:00 AM Comments (0) View
comments
http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=730351&publicationSubCategoryId=63
MANILA, Philippines - The Department of Education (DepEd) has acquired some P330-million worth of
science equipment, instruments and learning tools that will be distributed to public high schools in a bid
to improve the quality of science education for public school children.
At the same time, the agency has also allocated a P115-million financial assistance fund for the country’s
276 recognized Special Education (SPED) Centers to enable these schools to deliver quality educational
services to children with special learning needs.
Education Secretary Armin Luistro said the equipment and instruments are to be sent to 435 public high
schools nationwide to improve the students’ learning and appreciation of science concepts and
applications.
Luistro said that aside from the procurement, DepEd through its National Science Teaching and
Instrumentation Center (NSTIC) will hold a national consultative conference on the use of science
equipment in Cebu City to prepare teachers to properly handle and maintain the equipment.
He said the NSTIC, together with regional science supervisors and Bureau of Secondary Education (BSE)
representatives, will review and finalize the experiment and repair and maintenance manuals which will
be used for the subsequent regional training workshops in October that would cover the country’s 17
regions.
NSTIC and its regional trainors will train one teacher per science subject area in Integrated Science,
Biology, Chemistry and Physics in each recipient school.
Luistro said a stronger science and technology curriculum in basic education was part of the 10-point
education agenda of President Aquino aimed at producing graduates who are geared towards a science
and technology-driven economy.
DepEd had earlier boasted that it has added 100 new special science elementary schools this year,
bringing to 200 the total number of elementary schools offering a specialized curriculum focused on the
sciences.
What is RSHS?
http://www.bse.ph/index.php/component/content/article/34-mandate/160-rshs.html
The Regional Science High School (RSHS) Program consists of a network of 17 schools in the
country which offer a science-oriented curriculum that caters to students with aptitude in the
sciences.The program is aimed at the development of a science culture among the students with the
view to preparing them for careers in the sciences.
// Vision
A regional center of excellence on science and mathematics education at the secondary level that
shall develop potential leaders in science and related field.
// Mission
Development of responsible and morally upright science oriented leaders through relevant and
globally competitive science and mathematics education program.
// Nature of RHSS
Special school for the intellectually gifted and science inclined students in the region.
// Curriculum
CurriculumCore Curriculum (Regular H.S) and Curricula of English, Science and Mathematics shall
be enriched by additional subjects and electives prescribed in DepEd Order no. 49, s. 2003.
First Year
Second Year
Time
Unit/Credit
Time
Unit/Credit
2,220
min/week
11.1
2,220
min/week
11.1
(7.4
hours/day)
(7.4
hours/day)
Third Year
Fourth Year
Time
Unit/Credit
Time
Unit/Credit
2,340
min/week
11.7
2,340
min/week
11.7
(7.8
hours/day)
(7.8
hours/day)
// School Site
Separate site titled under the name of the school or donated in favor of the Department of
Education with a lot area of at least one (1) hectare
// Budget
Each RSHS received budget for salaries of staff and personnel including capital outlay for
infrastructure and subsidy for maintenance and other operating expenses. An additional subsidy is given
to all RSHSs.
// Implementation
There shall be only one (1) RSHS in every region. The seventeen (17) RSHSs in the country shall
implement DepEd Order No. 49, s. 2003 and shall meet the standard contained therein.
// Supervision
Generally supervised by the Secretary of the Department of Education through the Bureau of
Secondary Education in matters concerning curriculum policies and standards Managed by School
Principal in coordination with DepEd Regional and Division Offices.
Minimum of two (2) classes and a maximum of six (6) classes for each year level. Minimum of
twenty five (25) and a maximum of forty (40) students per class for better instruction and improved
laboratory work. .Managed by School Principal in coordination with DepEd Regional and Division Offices
Students who belong to upper 10% of the Grade VI graduating class, recommended by their
respective principals are qualified to take the entrance exam
* Interview
// Retention
Final grade of 85% in English, Science and Mathematics and a final grade of 83% in all other
learning areas, without grades lower than 80% in all subjects.
// Probation
Only (1) year probationary period to incoming second year and third year students
// Transfer
// Grading System
Four (4) grading periods Numerical system of grading and in multiples of one Final grade of 85% in
English, Science and Mathematics and a final grade of 83% in all other learning areas, without grades
lower than 80% in all subjects.
Regional Science High School for Region I Ma. Cristina St., Bangar, La Union
Regional Science High School for Region III East Kalayaan, SBMA Cpd., Olongapo City
Cavite National Science High Sch. for Reg. IVA Garlita B., Maragondon, Cavite
Bansud National High School for Region IVB Bansud, Oriental Mindoro
Bicol Regional Science High School for Region V Tuburan, Ligao City
Regional Science High School for Region VI Old Buswang, Kalibo, Aklan
RTPM Dumaguete Science High Sch. for Reg. VII Jaro, Dumaguete City
Regional Science High School for Region IX San Roque, Zamboanga CityGusa
Regional Science High School for Reg. X Gusa, Cagayan de Oro City
Gov. Leopoldo Mem. Science High Sch. for Reg. XI Gov’t Center, Davao Oriental
SaranganiRegional Science High School for CARAGA San Juan, Surigao City
Quezon City Science High School for NCR Misamis St., Bago Bantay, Quezon City
Cordillera Regional Science High Sch. for CAR Wangal, La Trinidad, Benguet
Amir Bara Lidasan National High School for ARMM Sarmiento, Parang, Maguindanao
// Program Guide
copyr
Collect It!
Established 1980
Type Public
The Regional Science High School for Region VI (formerly Aklan Development High School (AHDS) /
Science Development High School of Aklan (SDHSA) / Science Development National High School
(SDNHS) ) is a public secondary science school supervised by the Department of Education. It is located
in Old Buswang, Kalibo, Aklan, Philippines.
Adhering to the belief that education is the best investment for the future generations, Dr. Constancio I.
Constantino, then Chairman, Committee on Education and Culture of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of
the Province of Aklan sometime in 1979 conceived the idea of establishing a unique provincial high
school for the intellectually gifted and science-mathematics oriented youth of the province. Supportive
to the novel idea, former Governor Roberto Q. Garcia issued an Executive Order creating a steering
committee to study and work for the establishment of the provincial high school. The Sangguniang
Panlalawigan, during the 45th regular session approved Resolution No.178, s. 1979 on December 7,
1979 which authorized the establishment of Aklan Development High School (ADHS).
The ADHS is modeled after the Manila Science High School which offers Special Science Secondary
Education Curriculum with selective admission and retention requirements for students.
The authority to operate the first year class was endorsed by School Division Superintendent Joaquin
Tesoro and was approved by Minister Onofre D. Corpus on March 11, 1980. The first year class consisted
of 37 scholars who were selected based on a competitive admission test administered by the Science
Foundation of the Philippines Center No.6. The Class was formally opened by the MEC Regional Director
Antonio B. Tanchuan on June 9, 1980 for the school year 1980-81 and temporarily housed at the Bagong
Lipunan Building of the Kalibo Pilot Elementary School. The second, third and fourth years were
progressively organized every succeeding year thereafter. The school was transferred to its temporary
site at the Provincial Capitol compound in the school year 1981-82.
In school year 1982-83, a resolution requested a change from the name Aklan Development High School
to Science Development High School of Aklan (SDHSA) to make it more suggestive of its Special Science
Secondary Education Curriculum. Approval of the change of name was signed by MEC Minister Onofre
D. Corpus on December 23, 1982.
On June 21, 1991, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan approved a resolution donating a portion of one
hectare of the real property acquired by the Provincial Government from the Development Bank of the
Philippines to the SDHSA and authorizing the Provincial Governor to execute the Deed of Donation. The
Deed of Donation was made and entered into by and between the Provincial Government of Aklan
represented by Governor Corazon L. Cabagnot and the Department of Education, Culture and Sports-
Science Development National High School of Aklan represented by the Assistant Schools Division
Superintendent, Officer-in-charge, Division of Aklan, Mr. Crescente S. Alabado on July 11, 1991. The
newly acquired school site is located in Barangay Old Buswang, Kalibo, Aklan.
The P3.2 Million DECS-SEDP consists of an administration office, four academic classrooms, library,
laboratory and home economics room.
The new school site was inaugurated on October 4, 1993 in Barangay Old Buswang, Kalibo, Aklan. SDHSA
was then changed to Science Development National High School (SDNHS) due to the order of the
Department of Education, Culture and Sports that all barangay high schools should be named as national
high schools.
A permanent extension classroom and guard house (through the effort of PTCA) were built in 1994-
1995. Two more classrooms were constructed in 1995 and a fence was built a year after, also through
the efforts of the PTCA. Because of the growing population of the SDNHS, makeshift classrooms made of
nipa and bamboo were built, four in 1994 and two in 1995, through the efforts of parents.
Gradually, classrooms made of light materials were demolished to give way to more permanent
structures. In 1996, a science laboratory was constructed and each year thereafter, classrooms were
built under the DECS Regular School Building Program. In March 1997, four classrooms funded out of the
CDF of Senator Edgardo Angara was built.
The school was converted into a Regional Science High School in 1999. With this conversion, the school
will now cater to the needs of boys who are scientifically and mathematically inclined, not just in the
province of Aklan but also throughout Region VI. [1][dead link]
Background
From its establishment, the institution has had Dr. Concepcion P. Constantino as its principal, until July
2009 when she was replaced by Mrs. Merlyn S. Carrillo. The school has produced two Metrobank
Foundation Inc. Outstanding Teachers up to date: Mr. Dioso Torre (1993) and Mrs. Ruby Agnes Estrada.
School Publications
Both have earned regional and national recognitions. Its pool of writers have earned awards from the
Philippine Information Agency, and the Regional and National Schools Press Conference.
Class Sections
I-Pythagoras
I-Diophantus
I-Gauss
I-Mendeleeve
I-Euler
Second Year
II-Einstein
II-Archimedes
II-Edison
II-Curie
II-Napier
Third Year
III-Euclid
III-Lavoisier
III-Pascal
III-Descartes
III-Fermat
Fourth Year
IV-Newton
IV-Bernoullie
IV-Galileo
IV-Charles
IV-Boyle
IRYN WORKSHEET- October 18
http://www.education.com/reference/article/gender-academic-achievement/
Although there were no differences between boys and girls in fourth grade on mathematics, boys
began to perform better than girls on science tests in fourth grade (International Association for the
Evaluation of Education Achievement, n.d.).
Most studies show that, on average, girls do better in school than boys. Girls get higher grades and
complete high school at a higher rate compared to boys (Jacobs, 2002). Standardized achievement tests
also show that females are better at spelling and perform better on tests of literacy, writing, and general
knowledge (National Center for Education Statistics, 2003). An international aptitude test administered
to fourth graders in 35 countries, for example, showed that females outscored males on reading literacy
in every country. Girls continue to exhibit higher verbal ability throughout high school, but they begin to
lose ground to boys after fourth grade on tests of both mathematical and science ability. These gender
differences in math and science achievement have implications for girls’ future careers and have been a
source of concern for educators everywhere.