Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/43
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/43
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/43
SOCIOLOGY 9699/43
Paper 4 Globalisation, Media, Religion May/June 2023
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 70
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
The questions are marked using a generic analytic mark scheme, which separates the marks for the
different assessment objectives (AO). The work is marked for each AO using generic levels of
response mark schemes. The marks awarded are usually based on a judgement of the overall quality
of the response for that AO, rather than on awarding marks for specific points and accumulating a
total mark by adding points.
Indicative content is provided as a guide. Inevitably, the mark scheme cannot cover all responses that
candidates may make for all of the questions. In some cases candidates may make some responses
which the mark scheme has not predicted. These answers should nevertheless be credited according
to their quality.
1 ‘Only the rich and powerful benefit from globalisation.’ Evaluate this 35
view.
Indicative content
For:
Globalisation is seen by Marxist sociologists as a form of neo-
colonialism; as such, it benefits western capitalist elites at the expense
of underprivileged groups in less economically developed countries
which effectively become satellite states for western multi-national
corporations to exploit.
It is not clear that globalisation has led to a spread of democracy and
liberal values in developing societies; in many countries, there has been
a backlash against globalisation that, in some cases, has strengthened
the hand of oppressive regimes and led to violent clashes and abuse of
human rights.
Global migration has contributed to the spread of globalisation, but it is
not clear that migrants from less economically developed countries
necessarily benefit from opportunities to work in the more economically
developed countries. These workers may be exploited and exposed to
dangerous working conditions for very little financial reward. In some
cases, their conditions of life in the country of destination are harsher
than they were in their country of origin, and it is the rich and powerful in
developed countries who benefit most from the exploitation of migrant
workers.
The western model of capitalism that is promoted through globalisation
is not necessarily appropriate for meeting the economic and social
needs of the less economically developed countries in other parts of the
world. While the western model suits the interest of capitalist owners of
productive property, this is often achieved at the expense of poor
groups in developing countries.
1 Against:
Neoliberals argue that free markets and global trade contribute to
economic growth in all countries and from which everyone benefits.
Globalisation has been associated with the spread of democracy and
liberal values, helping to free people from oppressive political regimes
and exploitative social practices; it gives hope to others that liberation
from intolerable social and political circumstances is possible.
Increasing contact and exchange between people in different countries
is helping to break down barriers that in the past might have led to
conflict and wars; a cosmopolitan society of global citizens is viewed by
some as the best antidote to the inward- looking nationalism that has so
often led to bloody conflicts in the past, particularly in less developed
countries.
Modernisation theorists argue that globalisation helps spread the
cultural values that they believe are essential for successful economic
development, including the values of democracy, entrepreneurship,
individual freedom, and meritocracy.
Income from migrant workers is often used to support family and
communities in the country of origin.
Globalisation has helped to raise awareness of the poverty and
inequality experienced by people in developing countries, and this in
turn has led to increased efforts to help the poor through initiatives such
as international aid and political intervention to check oppressive and
exploitative practices in many developing countries.
Indicative content
For:
Critics argue that aid programmes often attempt to achieve short-term
relief only; these programmes are generally not designed to deliver
long-term improvements in social and economic conditions.
Some aid programmes impose conditions on developing countries that
may be detrimental to attempts to reduce poverty in the long-term.
Aid often fails to benefit intended recipients; for example, due to
corruption among officials in developing countries or because of a lack
of understanding of how best to distribute and apply aid ‘on the ground’.
Modernisation theorists argue that certain cultural values are essential
for successful economic development in poorer countries, including the
values of democracy, entrepreneurship, individual freedom, and
meritocracy. Countries that adopt these values and follow the model of
development that proved successful in Western societies can escape
poverty through their own efforts. In this view, aid programmes alone
will fail to make much difference to levels of poverty in developing
countries.
Dependency theory and World Systems theory argue that inequalities in
the structural relationship between rich countries and poorer countries
explain why many poorer countries have found it so difficult to develop
their economies successfully. Aid programmes fail to address these
structural relationships and so prove ineffective in reducing poverty in
developing countries.
2 Against:
Not all aid programmes focus on short-term relief only. There has been
an increasing focus in recent years on forms of aid that potentially have
a lasting impact in lifting recipients out of poverty.
Some developing countries have been successful in building stronger
economies, helping to lift many of the population out of poverty. In some
cases, international aid has been an important factor in kicking-starting
this process of development.
Claims that aid is often misappropriated by corrupt officials are
exaggerated; most aid agencies exercise tight control over how aid is
distributed and who they work with as partners in applying the aid.
Some forms of aid appear to be more effective in reducing poverty than
other forms.
Aid is often part of a package of measures designed to help lift
developing countries out of poverty; as such, aid programme should be
assessed in this broader context
Indicative content
For:
Marxist sociologists argue that control of the media rests in the hands of
owners of the media and companies that fund the media through paying
for advertisements. Their interests are aligned with the capitalist ruling
class as a whole and the media therefore are supportive of capitalist
values and objectives. Others groups, such as audiences, have little or
no opportunity to influence the content of the media, in this view.
Media conglomerates operate increasingly on a global scale and,
arguably, this has extended their power to promote capitalist interests
free from any controls or restrictions that other groups, such as
audiences, might seek to impose.
Some studies show that the values expressed in the media reflect elite
interests rather than correspond to the values and beliefs of audiences
generally.
Do the public get what they want from the media, or come to want what
they are given? Marxists and feminists argue the latter.
The extent to which the new media have opened up opportunities for
individuals to influence media content can be questioned – increasingly
a handful of global conglomerates control which ideas and opinions are
seen and shared, it can be argued.
3 Against:
Pluralists argue that in relation to the media power lies with the
consumer or audience rather than with owners or media professionals.
Pluralists argue that in order to attract viewers and readers media
organisations must produce content that appeals to different sections of
society.
Government regulations often require some or all media organisations
to operate in ways that allow scope for different groups in society to
influence the media (for example, the BBC Charter). Government
censorship also acts as a check on bias in the media that might favour
the interests of one group over another.
There are many examples of where powerful lobby groups representing
different sections of society have been successful in influencing the
decisions taken by media organisations.
Digital optimists argue that the new media has provided powerful new
means for individual citizens and protest groups to oppose established
authorities (such as the ruling class) and argue for changes in society
that benefit the less privileged and the poor.
Indicative content
For:
The media often use gender stereotypes that present women in a
negative light and reflect patriarchal ideas about the appropriate role of
women in society.
Some media outlets use objectified and sexualised images of women to
advertise products and attract interest from male audiences.
Media representations of men may reflect patriarchal value, with males
characterised as breadwinners, decision makers, emotionally strong,
and interested in hobbies such as sport and cars.
Studies have shown that media content often defines key concerns for
women as beauty, appearance, family, relationships, and childcare.
Against:
There have been changes in the way women are presented in the
media in recent years to reflect opposition to sexism and gender
stereotyping.
Some media outlets are committed to combatting sexism in the media.
Women working within the media have been effective in confronting
some elements of patriarchy within the media industry.
The new media have provided opportunities for more men and women
to create media content (Facebook and YouTube, for example) and to
challenge gender stereotypes and sexist representations in the media.
Indicative content
For:
There are numerous examples of where religion has acted as an
instrument of social control, both in the case of theistic regimes and
cases of where established religions have acted in support of
democratic states in imposing order and control in society.
Marxist theory suggests that religion is an ideological force that helps to
maintain social order in capitalist societies by creating false
consciousness and passivity among the working class.
Feminist theory sees a close relationship between religion and
patriarchy, suggesting that religious organisations and beliefs play a
part in maintaining the dominance of men over women in society.
Historical examples of where religion has been imposed on subordinate
groups by the rich and privileged, including the early period of
industrialisation with the working class and cases of missionary work in
the spread of colonialism in the nineteenth century.
Successful capitalist economies (US, UK, Germany, Japan) have often
enjoyed long periods of relative stability within their own borders where
divisions such as those between employers and workers are contained
and a high level of social control is maintained by the state and related
agencies. There is evidence that organised religion may have
contributed significantly to forms of mediation and control that help to
maintain harmony between the interests of capitalist owners and the
industrial working class.
5 Against:
While religion may act as an instrument of social control, it can also be
a source of division and open conflict in society. Conflicts between
Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland and between Hindus and
Muslims in India, are just two examples of this.
Functionalists argue that religion contributes to social solidarity and to
the fulfilment of particular individual and collective needs.
It is not always the case that organised religions set out determinedly to
avoid conflict or to help maintain the status quo. Liberation Theology,
for example, is a concerted effort by a committed group of priests in
Latin America to challenge oppressive political regimes and press for
social changes that would help alleviate poverty and exploitation.
Max Weber rightly warned against making sweeping generalisations
about the contribution that religion makes to society. He recognised that
the role of religion can vary across time and between societies, and that
not all religions have the same impact on people’s thoughts and
behaviour. In some situations, Weber said religion could be a source of
social change, in others it may act as a conservative force or a catalyst
for division and confrontation. This is a more nuanced way of thinking
about the role of religion than the one presented in traditional
functionalist and Marxist theories of religion.
The secularisation thesis suggests that religion has lost its social
significance and therefore it is debatable whether organised religions
retain the power to play a part in the maintenance of social control.
6 ‘People are just as religious today as in the past.’ Evaluate this view. 35
Indicative content
For:
Arguments supporting the idea of a religious revival today.
Decline in membership of established religious organisations does not
necessarily mean that belief in religion is any less today than in the
past. Many people appear to believe without belonging today.
Some religious organisations appear to be attracting more followers
(the Evangelical movement in the US, for example)
People may have changed the ways they practice religion; for example,
an increase in privatised worship and the use of social media for
religious engagement.
The growth of NRMs may indicate a religious revival.
Religious fundamentalism appears to be on the rise in recent years in
some societies.
Possible growth in privatised forms of religion.
Against:
Falling membership of religious organisations and competition from
other belief systems would indicate a decline in religiosity rather than
the opposite.
Fewer people are participating in religious ceremonies.
People are more likely to challenge the authority of established religions
to decide key issues of morality in society.
There is more profanity and possibly greater acceptance of heresy and
blasphemy today, which stands at odds with the idea that religious
belief remains as strong as in the past.
Some studies suggest people of faith devote less time to religious
activities today than in the past and some have become more
questioning of their faith.
Religiosity is difficult to measure so any empirical evidence about the
strength of people’s religious belief today has to be treated sceptically.
3 Good knowledge and understanding of the view on which the question 7–9
is based.
The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
1 Basic knowledge and understanding of the view on which the question 1–3
is based.
The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points with
some references to concepts or theory or research evidence.