Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/21
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/21
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/21
SOCIOLOGY 9699/21
Paper 2 The Family May/June 2023
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
Some of the questions are marked using a point-based system, awarding marks for specific points
and accumulating a total mark by adding points.
Some of the questions are marked using level of response. For these, the level description represents
performance at the top of the level.
For Question 4 and Question 5, award a mark for each assessment objective separately, using the
level descriptions.
In some cases, candidates may provide a response which the mark scheme has not predicted. These
answers should nevertheless be credited according to their quality.
Indicative content
(2 2 marks)
2(a) Explain two ways family life can be harmful for some members. 8
Indicative content
Reward a maximum of two ways. Up to 4 marks are available for each way.
1 mark for making a point / giving a way (e.g. victims of domestic violence).
1 mark for explaining that point (e.g. love can often turn into hate in intense
emotional circumstances, resulting in lashing out).
1 mark for explaining how the material supports the point (e.g. the growing
isolation of the nuclear family from extended kin may be increasing the
intensity and occurrence of violence).
(2 4 marks)
2(b) Explain one strength and one limitation of radical feminist views of the 6
family.
Indicative content
Strengths
Has challenged gendered norms and highlighted some important
features of female oppression in the family.
Recognises that changes in law/policies are not enough and that
underlying patriarchal ideology needs eradicating if women are to be
freed from male dominance in the family.
Highlights the inequalities of power that take place within the family due
to patriarchy.
Has raised awareness of the extent of domestic violence women
experience.
May be now more realistically possible to introduce due to
advancements in technology e.g. IVF, surrogacy etc. for lesbian
couples.
Any other appropriate strength.
Limitations
Over two thirds of divorces are initiated by women indicating that
women can and do leave unhappy or exploitative marriages.
What is seen as oppression and inequality may actually be the result of
women exercising free choice/there are those women that want to be in
a domestic role within a nuclear family (Hakim / Rational Choice
theory).
Assumes women’s actions are shaped and dictated by patriarchy -
ignores the idea that women are individuals that make choices about
family life and relationships.
Exaggerates the prevalence of negative experiences for females in the
family e.g. domestic violence.
Their extreme views of men in families as the enemy are divisive.
Ambitions not achievable – would require the active acceptance of men
to abandon their own interests/patriarchal dominance.
Outdated/irrelevant – does not take into account the progress towards
gender equality in the family (Somerville / liberal feminist criticisms).
Over emphasises the nuclear family, neglecting the diversity of family
arrangements in which women’s roles are not all the same.
Extreme and unrealistic – Its approach to achieving removal of
patriarchy e.g. baby strike is unlikely to ever be achievable.
Biologically deterministic – blames female inequality in the family on
their ability to reproduce, failing to consider other causes e.g.
capitalism.
Any other appropriate limitation.
2(b) 1 mark for explaining why radical feminism has this strength (e.g. brings
attention to the role of patriarchy in creating female exploitation in the
family).
1 mark for explaining why it is a strength (e.g. this has led to important
policy changes in addressing problems such as domestic violence).
(1 3 marks)
1 mark for identifying a limitation of radical feminism (e.g. over two thirds of
divorces are initiated by women indicating that women can and do leave
unhappy or exploitative marriages)
1 mark for explaining why radical feminism has this limitation (e.g. it
assumes women are inevitably oppressed and subordinate to men, trapped
in the marriage)
1 mark for explaining why it is a limitation (e.g. fails to recognise the growing
independence of women meaning they do not need to rely on a husband for
financial support).
(1 3 marks)
Indicative content
Levels of response
Indicative content
Levels of response
Level 0: 0 marks
No response worthy of credit.
4 Evaluate the view that grandparents play a positive role in the family. 26
Indicative content
4
In support of the view Against the view
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 Good knowledge and understanding of the view that grandparents play 7–8
a positive role in the family.
The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
2 Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that grandparents play 3–4
a positive role in the family.
The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and
may include basic references to concepts or theories or research
evidence.
4 The material selected will be accurately interpreted, well developed and 7–8
consistently applied to answering the question.
3 The material selected will be accurate and relevant but lacks either 5–6
some development or clear application to the question.
2 The material selected is relevant to the question but is not applied 3–4
accurately or has limited development.
1 There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this lacks focus 1–2
on or relevance to the specific question.
5 Evaluate the view that the main role of the family is to serve the needs 26
of capitalism.
Indicative content
5
In support of the view Against the view
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 Good knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role of 7–8
the family is to serve the needs of capitalism.
The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
3 Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that the main 5–6
role of the family is to serve the needs of capitalism.
The response contains a narrow range of detailed points or a wider
range of underdeveloped points, with some use of concepts or theory
or research evidence.
2 Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role of 3-4
the family is to serve the needs of capitalism.
The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and
may include basic references to concepts or theories or research
evidence.
1 Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role of 1-2
the family is to serve the needs of capitalism.
The response contains only assertive points or common-sense
observations.
3 The material selected will be accurate and relevant but lacks either 5–6
some development or clear application to the question.
2 The material selected is relevant to the question but is not applied 3–4
accurately or has limited development.
1 There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this lacks 1–2
focus on or relevance to the specific question.
5 Very good analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the 9–10
family is to serve the needs of capitalism.
The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
4 Good analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family 7–8
is to serve the needs of capitalism.
The evaluation is explicit and direct but not sustained or a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments suggesting that the
main role of the family is not necessarily to serve the needs of
capitalism.
3 Some analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family 5–6
is to serve the needs of capitalism.
There is juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are
not clearly focused on the question or a few simple points suggesting
that the main role of the family is not necessarily to serve the needs
of capitalism.
2 Basic analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family 3–4
is to serve the needs of capitalism.
There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or
one simple point suggesting that the main role of the family is not
necessarily to serve the needs of capitalism.
1 Limited analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the 1–2
family is to serve the needs of capitalism.
Any analysis or evaluation is incidental, confused or simply assertive.