Concept of Application of Income

Application of Income refers to the allocation or expenditure of income after it has been earned by
the assessee. The essential aspect of this concept is that the income in question is first earned by the
assessee and only then is it applied towards fulfilling an obligation or making a payment. As such, the
income is part of the total income of the assessee and is subject to taxation.

Definition of Application of Income

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, Application of Income is not explicitly defined, but its principles are
derived from the general understanding of income taxation. Income is generally understood to be
taxable when it is received or deemed to be received by the assessee. Once income is earned, any
subsequent application or expenditure of that income does not affect its taxability.

Example of Application of Income

To better understand the concept, consider the example of Mr. A, who is liable to pay alimony to his
ex-wife, Ms. B. If Mr. A instructs his employer, Mr. C, to directly pay Rs. 2,000/- per month to Ms. B
from his salary, this amount would still be considered part of Mr. A’s taxable income. The reason for
this is that Mr. A has earned the income first and only after earning it, he applies it to fulfill his
obligation to Ms. B. Therefore, this amount remains within the scope of Mr. A’s taxable income.

Judicial Interpretation of Application of Income

The judiciary has consistently upheld the principle that income, once earned, remains taxable even if
it is applied or spent for specific purposes. One of the leading cases on this topic is CIT v. Sitaldas
Tirathdas [(1961) 41 ITR 367 (SC)], where the Supreme Court held that when income is earned by the
assessee, its subsequent application towards discharge of an obligation does not remove it from the
purview of taxation.

In this case, the assessee was obligated to pay a certain portion of his income to his wife and children
under a court decree. The assessee claimed that this income should not be taxed as it was applied
towards a legal obligation. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the income was taxable because it
was first earned by the assessee and then applied to fulfill the obligation.

Concept of Diversion of Income

Diversion of Income is a contrasting concept where income is diverted before it is earned by the
assessee. In this case, the income never actually becomes the income of the assessee, as it is
transferred to another person or entity through an overriding title before it can be claimed by the
assessee. Because the income is diverted at the source, it is not included in the total income of the
assessee and is therefore not taxable in their hands.

Definition of Diversion of Income

Similar to Application of Income, the concept of Diversion of Income is also not explicitly defined in
the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, it is well-established through various judicial decisions. The core
principle of Diversion of Income is the presence of an overriding title that causes the income to be
redirected before it reaches the assessee.

Example of Diversion of Income

Consider the case of M/s ABC, a partnership firm where A and his two sons B and C are partners.
According to the partnership deed, after the death of Mr. A, 20% of the firm’s profits are to be paid
to Mrs. D, the wife of Mr. A and mother of B and C. After Mr. A’s death, this 20% of profit is diverted
to Mrs. D before it becomes part of the firm’s income. As a result, this amount is not included in the
taxable income of the firm, M/s ABC.

Judicial Interpretation of Diversion of Income

The concept of Diversion of Income was elaborated upon in the case of CIT v. Bijli Cotton Mills (P)
Ltd [(1979) 116 ITR 60 (SC)]. In this case, the Supreme Court held that for an income to be considered
diverted at source, there must be an overriding title that diverts the income before it reaches the
assessee. If such a title exists, the income never becomes the property of the assessee and therefore
is not taxable in their hands.

Another significant case is CIT v. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd [(1969) 74 ITR 17 (SC)],
where the Supreme Court differentiated between diversion of income by an overriding title and
application of income. The court ruled that where income is diverted before it is earned due to an
overriding obligation, it does not form part of the assessee’s total income.

Differences Between Application of Income and Diversion of Income

The primary difference between Application of Income and Diversion of Income lies in the timing and
the nature of the income’s allocation:

 Timing: In Application of Income, the income is first earned by the assessee and then applied
to fulfill an obligation. In Diversion of Income, the income is diverted before it is earned by
the assessee.

 Taxability: Income that is applied after being earned is taxable in the hands of the assessee.
In contrast, income that is diverted before being earned is not taxable in the hands of the
assessee.

 Overriding Title: Diversion of Income requires the presence of an overriding title that diverts
the income at source. Application of Income does not involve an overriding title.

Here’s a table summarising the key differences between Application of Income and Diversion of
Income:

Aspect Application of Income Diversion of Income

Allocation or expenditure of income after Redirection of income before it is earned by th

Definition
it is earned. assessee.

Timing Income is first earned by the assessee. Income is diverted before it reaches the assess

Taxability Taxable in the hands of the assessee. Not taxable in the hands of the assessee.

Presence of an overriding title that causes inco

Overriding Title No overriding title is present.
diversion.

Legal Obligation Fulfillment of an obligation after income Income is diverted due to a legal obligation be
 is earned. is earned.

Mr. A paying alimony to his ex-wife from Partnership firm diverting 20% of profit to a pa
Example
his salary. wife as per the deed.

Included in the total income of the

Effect on Total Income Excluded from the total income of the assesse
assessee.

Income remains taxable despite its

Practical Implications Income is excluded from taxation due to divers
application.

Importance for Tax Must be carefully identified to avoid

Can be structured to optimise tax liabilities leg
Planning misclassification.

Case Laws and Judicial Precedents

The distinction between Application of Income and Diversion of Income has been clarified through
various judicial precedents. Below are some of the key cases that have shaped the understanding of
these concepts.

CIT v. Sitaldas Tirathdas (1961)

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the payment made by the
assessee to his wife and children under a court decree could be considered as Diversion of Income.
The court held that since the income was first earned by the assessee and then applied to fulfil the
obligation, it constituted Application of Income and was therefore taxable in the assessee’s hands.

CIT v. Bijli Cotton Mills (P) Ltd (1979)

This case involved the issue of whether a payment made by a company to its managing agents as
commission could be considered as Diversion of Income. The Supreme Court ruled that since the
commission was payable out of the company’s profits and was therefore deducted from the income
before it could be claimed by the company, it constituted Diversion of Income. The court emphasised
the need for an overriding title for income to be considered diverted at source.

CIT v. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd (1969)

The Supreme Court in this case distinguished between Diversion of Income and Application of
Income. The court ruled that income which is diverted at source due to an overriding obligation does
not form part of the assessee’s total income. The decision highlighted the importance of the legal
obligation that causes the diversion of income.

CIT v. Tollygunge Club Ltd (1977)

In this case, the Supreme Court dealt with the issue of whether the income derived from entrance
fees charged by a club could be considered as Diversion of Income. The court held that since the
income was first earned by the club and then applied towards its activities, it was a case of
Application of Income and not Diversion of Income.

Practical Implications and Tax Planning

Understanding the difference between Application of Income and Diversion of Income has significant
implications for tax planning and compliance. Taxpayers, whether individuals or businesses, must
accurately determine whether a particular income falls under Application or Diversion to correctly
compute their taxable income.

Tax Planning Strategies

Tax planning strategies often involve structuring transactions and obligations to ensure that income is
correctly categorised. For instance, businesses may structure partnership deeds, contracts or
agreements in a way that certain income is diverted before it is earned, thereby reducing the overall
taxable income.

However, it is essential to note that such strategies must comply with legal and regulatory
frameworks. The income tax authorities closely scrutinise arrangements that appear to be designed
solely to avoid taxation and any attempt to misrepresent Application of Income as Diversion of
Income may lead to legal challenges and penalties.

Compliance and Reporting

Accurate reporting of income in tax returns is crucial for compliance with tax laws. Taxpayers must
ensure that they correctly classify their income as either applied or diverted, based on the legal
principles and judicial precedents discussed above. Misclassification of income can result in
underpayment of taxes, leading to interest, penalties and legal disputes with tax authorities.

Conclusion

The concepts of Application of Income and Diversion of Income play a critical role in determining the
taxable income of an assessee. While the former involves the allocation of income after it has been
earned, making it taxable, the latter involves the redirection of income before it is earned, making it
non-taxable.

The distinction between these two concepts has been clarified through various judicial decisions,
which provide a clear framework for taxpayers to determine the taxability of their income. While
Application of Income and Diversion of Income may seem similar at first glance, they are distinct
concepts with significant implications for income tax assessment.
Law Notes

Case Briefs

Law Notes for All Subjects

Administrative Law Notes

Arbitration & Conciliation Act Notes

Law of Contracts Notes

Constitutional Law Notes

Corporate Law Notes

CRPC Notes

Cyber Law Notes

Environmental Law Notes

Law of Evidence Notes

Family Law Notes

Human Rights Law Notes

International Law Notes

Indian Partnership Act Notes

Indian Penal Code Notes

Intellectual Property Rights Notes

Jurisprudence Notes

Law of Torts Notes

Sale of Goods Act Notes

Transfer of Property Act Notes

Other Laws Notes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Add Comment *

Post Comment

About LawBhoomi

Started by NLU grads, LawBhoomi is a portal that provides information on the latest internships,
jobs, legal opportunities, law notes, career guidance, study materials, and books for various exams
like the judiciary, CLAT PG, AIBE, CLAT UG, etc. Apart from all these, interviews and internship
experiences help students explore more opportunities in law.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Important Statistics

Site users: 5+ lakhs

Site viewership: 20 lakhs per month

Instagram followers: 13,000+ (Click Here)

LinkedIn followers: 43,000+ (Click Here)

WhatsApp groups: 35,000+ members (Click Here)

Telegram channel: 13,500+ members (Click Here)

Contact Info

You may reach out to us by dropping an email to:

contact@lawbhoomi.com or lawbhoomi@gmail.com

Advertise with us | Submit Posts

Copyright © 2019-2024 LawBhoomi.

Concept of
Application of Income

Application of Income refers to the allocation or expenditure of income after it has been earned by
the assessee. The essential aspect of this concept is that the income in question is first earned by the
assessee and only then is it applied towards fulfilling an obligation or making a payment. As such, the
income is part of the total income of the assessee and is subject to taxation.

Definition of Application of Income

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, Application of Income is not explicitly defined, but its principles are
derived from the general understanding of income taxation. Income is generally understood to be
taxable when it is received or deemed to be received by the assessee. Once income is earned, any
subsequent application or expenditure of that income does not affect its taxability.

Example of Application of Income

To better understand the concept, consider the example of Mr. A, who is liable to pay alimony to his
ex-wife, Ms. B. If Mr. A instructs his employer, Mr. C, to directly pay Rs. 2,000/- per month to Ms. B
from his salary, this amount would still be considered part of Mr. A’s taxable income. The reason for
this is that Mr. A has earned the income first and only after earning it, he applies it to fulfill his
obligation to Ms. B. Therefore, this amount remains within the scope of Mr. A’s taxable income.

Judicial Interpretation of Application of Income

The judiciary has consistently upheld the principle that income, once earned, remains taxable even if
it is applied or spent for specific purposes. One of the leading cases on this topic is CIT v. Sitaldas
Tirathdas [(1961) 41 ITR 367 (SC)], where the Supreme Court held that when income is earned by the
assessee, its subsequent application towards discharge of an obligation does not remove it from the
purview of taxation.

In this case, the assessee was obligated to pay a certain portion of his income to his wife and children
under a court decree. The assessee claimed that this income should not be taxed as it was applied
towards a legal obligation. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the income was taxable because it
was first earned by the assessee and then applied to fulfill the obligation.

Concept of Diversion of Income

Diversion of Income is a contrasting concept where income is diverted before it is earned by the
assessee. In this case, the income never actually becomes the income of the assessee, as it is
transferred to another person or entity through an overriding title before it can be claimed by the
assessee. Because the income is diverted at the source, it is not included in the total income of the
assessee and is therefore not taxable in their hands.

Definition of Diversion of Income

Similar to Application of Income, the concept of Diversion of Income is also not explicitly defined in
the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, it is well-established through various judicial decisions. The core
principle of Diversion of Income is the presence of an overriding title that causes the income to be
redirected before it reaches the assessee.

Example of Diversion of Income

Consider the case of M/s ABC, a partnership firm where A and his two sons B and C are partners.
According to the partnership deed, after the death of Mr. A, 20% of the firm’s profits are to be paid
to Mrs. D, the wife of Mr. A and mother of B and C. After Mr. A’s death, this 20% of profit is diverted
to Mrs. D before it becomes part of the firm’s income. As a result, this amount is not included in the
taxable income of the firm, M/s ABC.

Judicial Interpretation of Diversion of Income

The concept of Diversion of Income was elaborated upon in the case of CIT v. Bijli Cotton Mills (P)
Ltd [(1979) 116 ITR 60 (SC)]. In this case, the Supreme Court held that for an income to be considered
diverted at source, there must be an overriding title that diverts the income before it reaches the
assessee. If such a title exists, the income never becomes the property of the assessee and therefore
is not taxable in their hands.

Another significant case is CIT v. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd [(1969) 74 ITR 17 (SC)],
where the Supreme Court differentiated between diversion of income by an overriding title and
application of income. The court ruled that where income is diverted before it is earned due to an
overriding obligation, it does not form part of the assessee’s total income.

Differences Between Application of Income and Diversion of Income

The primary difference between Application of Income and Diversion of Income lies in the timing and
the nature of the income’s allocation:

 Timing: In Application of Income, the income is first earned by the assessee and then applied
to fulfill an obligation. In Diversion of Income, the income is diverted before it is earned by
the assessee.

 Taxability: Income that is applied after being earned is taxable in the hands of the assessee.
In contrast, income that is diverted before being earned is not taxable in the hands of the
assessee.

 Overriding Title: Diversion of Income requires the presence of an overriding title that diverts
the income at source. Application of Income does not involve an overriding title.

Here’s a table summarising the key differences between Application of Income and Diversion of
Income:

Aspect Application of Income Diversion of Income

Allocation or expenditure of income after Redirection of income before it is earned by th

Definition
it is earned. assessee.

Timing Income is first earned by the assessee. Income is diverted before it reaches the assess

Taxability Taxable in the hands of the assessee. Not taxable in the hands of the assessee.

Presence of an overriding title that causes inco

Overriding Title No overriding title is present.
diversion.

Legal Obligation Fulfillment of an obligation after income Income is diverted due to a legal obligation be
 is earned. is earned.

Mr. A paying alimony to his ex-wife from Partnership firm diverting 20% of profit to a pa
Example
his salary. wife as per the deed.

Included in the total income of the

Effect on Total Income Excluded from the total income of the assesse
assessee.

Income remains taxable despite its

Practical Implications Income is excluded from taxation due to divers
application.

Importance for Tax Must be carefully identified to avoid

Can be structured to optimise tax liabilities leg
Planning misclassification.

Case Laws and Judicial Precedents

The distinction between Application of Income and Diversion of Income has been clarified through
various judicial precedents. Below are some of the key cases that have shaped the understanding of
these concepts.

CIT v. Sitaldas Tirathdas (1961)

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the payment made by the
assessee to his wife and children under a court decree could be considered as Diversion of Income.
The court held that since the income was first earned by the assessee and then applied to fulfil the
obligation, it constituted Application of Income and was therefore taxable in the assessee’s hands.

CIT v. Bijli Cotton Mills (P) Ltd (1979)

This case involved the issue of whether a payment made by a company to its managing agents as
commission could be considered as Diversion of Income. The Supreme Court ruled that since the
commission was payable out of the company’s profits and was therefore deducted from the income
before it could be claimed by the company, it constituted Diversion of Income. The court emphasised
the need for an overriding title for income to be considered diverted at source.

CIT v. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd (1969)

The Supreme Court in this case distinguished between Diversion of Income and Application of
Income. The court ruled that income which is diverted at source due to an overriding obligation does
not form part of the assessee’s total income. The decision highlighted the importance of the legal
obligation that causes the diversion of income.

CIT v. Tollygunge Club Ltd (1977)

In this case, the Supreme Court dealt with the issue of whether the income derived from entrance
fees charged by a club could be considered as Diversion of Income. The court held that since the
income was first earned by the club and then applied towards its activities, it was a case of
Application of Income and not Diversion of Income.

Practical Implications and Tax Planning

Understanding the difference between Application of Income and Diversion of Income has significant
implications for tax planning and compliance. Taxpayers, whether individuals or businesses, must
accurately determine whether a particular income falls under Application or Diversion to correctly
compute their taxable income.

Tax Planning Strategies

Tax planning strategies often involve structuring transactions and obligations to ensure that income is
correctly categorised. For instance, businesses may structure partnership deeds, contracts or
agreements in a way that certain income is diverted before it is earned, thereby reducing the overall
taxable income.

However, it is essential to note that such strategies must comply with legal and regulatory
frameworks. The income tax authorities closely scrutinise arrangements that appear to be designed
solely to avoid taxation and any attempt to misrepresent Application of Income as Diversion of
Income may lead to legal challenges and penalties.

Compliance and Reporting

Accurate reporting of income in tax returns is crucial for compliance with tax laws. Taxpayers must
ensure that they correctly classify their income as either applied or diverted, based on the legal
principles and judicial precedents discussed above. Misclassification of income can result in
underpayment of taxes, leading to interest, penalties and legal disputes with tax authorities.

Conclusion

The concepts of Application of Income and Diversion of Income play a critical role in determining the
taxable income of an assessee. While the former involves the allocation of income after it has been
earned, making it taxable, the latter involves the redirection of income before it is earned, making it
non-taxable.

The distinction between these two concepts has been clarified through various judicial decisions,
which provide a clear framework for taxpayers to determine the taxability of their income. While
Application of Income and Diversion of Income may seem similar at first glance, they are distinct
concepts with significant implications for income tax assessment.

Attention all law students!

Are you tired of missing out on internship, job opportunities and law notes?

Well, fear no more! With 45,000+ students already on board, you don't want to be left behind. Be a
part of the biggest legal community around!

Join our WhatsApp Groups (Click Here) and Telegram Channel (Click Here) and get instant
notifications.
Previous PostWhat are the Documents Required for Court Marriage in India?

Next PostThe Right to Strike, Hartal and Bandh

You might like

Jurisprudence Notes, Case Laws and Study Materials

What is the Prohibited Degree of Relationship?

Motive, Preparation, and Previous or Subsequent Conduct under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Search Here!

Search
Law Notes

Case Briefs

Law Notes for All Subjects

Administrative Law Notes

Arbitration & Conciliation Act Notes

Law of Contracts Notes

Constitutional Law Notes

Corporate Law Notes

CRPC Notes

Cyber Law Notes

Environmental Law Notes

Law of Evidence Notes

Family Law Notes

Human Rights Law Notes

International Law Notes

Indian Partnership Act Notes

Indian Penal Code Notes

Intellectual Property Rights Notes

Jurisprudence Notes

Law of Torts Notes

Sale of Goods Act Notes

Transfer of Property Act Notes

Other Laws Notes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Add Comment *

Post Comment

About LawBhoomi

Started by NLU grads, LawBhoomi is a portal that provides information on the latest internships,
jobs, legal opportunities, law notes, career guidance, study materials, and books for various exams
like the judiciary, CLAT PG, AIBE, CLAT UG, etc. Apart from all these, interviews and internship
experiences help students explore more opportunities in law.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Important Statistics

Site users: 5+ lakhs

Site viewership: 20 lakhs per month

Instagram followers: 13,000+ (Click Here)

LinkedIn followers: 43,000+ (Click Here)

WhatsApp groups: 35,000+ members (Click Here)

Telegram channel: 13,500+ members (Click Here)

Contact Info

You may reach out to us by dropping an email to:

contact@lawbhoomi.com or lawbhoomi@gmail.com

Advertise with us | Submit Posts

Copyright © 2019-2024 LawBhoomi.