Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

13867756-Totten-Renewables-Chapter-in-a-Climate-for-Life-08

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/259219445

Renewable Energy

Chapter · January 2008

CITATIONS READS
0 3,737

1 author:

Michael P. Totten
AssetsforLife.net
38 PUBLICATIONS 150 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Michael P. Totten on 02 June 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


CHAPTER TWO

Renewable Energy
Michael Totten

or millennia, renewable energy from the wind, sea, sun, and land

F provided all of the Earth’s energy needs. It was the Industrial Era
that drove humanity to use coal, oil, and natural gas fossil fuels (and
eventually nuclear energy) to support its nearly insatiable appetite for power.
Today we face energy and climate crises that threaten both the survival of the
human species as well as biodiversity across the globe. In response, renewables
are once again being pursued as one of the key solutions to meet our needs
in a sustainable way. This chapter focuses on what they actually are and what
they can contribute.
World consumption of fossil fuels has increased exponentially in the past
century, and industrialized countries consume the lion’s share. In 2005, China
consumed as much coal as the United States, Russia, India, and Australia
combined. However, the United States, with only 5% of the world’s population,
consumes one-fourth of the daily global oil supply, whereas China accounts
for 6% of consumption with one-fifth of global population. Between 2000
and 2025, oil use is officially forecast to grow by 44% in the United States and
57% in the world. By 2025, the United States will use as much oil as Canada,
Western and Eastern Europe, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand combined.
The forecasted increase alone in U.S. oil imports will exceed the 2001 total oil
use of China, India, and South Korea (Lovins et al., 2004).
Yet the problems of growth are not limited to the United States. Today, only
12% of the world’s population own cars. Africa and China currently have the
car ownership America enjoyed in 1915. However, China’s compound annual
car growth was 55% between 2001 and 2005. By 2025, its cars could require
the oil output of a Saudi Arabia or two (which now exports one-fourth of
world oil).
Such harrowing growth rates in fossil fuel usage will dramatically increase
greenhouse gas emissions to a level threatening to derail society’s capacity to
stabilize atmospheric concentrations below a safe threshold, triggering multi-
century catastrophic consequences (Hansen, 2005; Hansen et al., 2008;
An early-morning wave breaks into the sunrise in Ventura, Romm, 2007). Fortunately, a significant fraction of the growth rate in the
California. There are many ways to tap the energy available
global demand for energy and mobility services can be effectively satisfied
in the ocean, including harnessing underwater currents, tidal
flows, and wave motion. TODD GLASER through smart energy efficiency improvements, at tens of trillions of dollars

77

Climate4Life.indb 77 6/27/08 7:44:09 PM


A CLIMATE FOR LIFE

Livestock release methane, and research is showing how to


reduce it. At the same time, methane from animal waste can
be recycled into a renewable gas. PETER ESSICK

lower cost this century compared to conventional supply expansion. Moreover, Opinion surveys consistently show that more than 80% of citizens prefer
as illuminated in Chapter 1: Energy Efficiency, many of the efficiency gains solar and other renewables and energy efficiency to the use of fossil fuels. This
actually enhance the cost-effectiveness of wind and solar energy options. is not surprising, given the unimaginably vast amount of renewable energy
Renewable resources take diverse forms and include solar, wind, geothermal, flows worldwide. Consider that global human energy consumption in 2007
biological, and hydrological sources. They can be used to provide any of the amounted to just one hour of sunlight landing on Earth. Expert evaluations
myriad applications for which humankind requires: thermal heat; solid, liquid, conclude that renewables are quite capable over the long term, in combination
or gaseous chemical fuels; or even electricity. with extensive energy efficiency gains, to economically provide the current
Many of these sources are highly cost-effective now and will only become total global energy supply many times over.
increasingly economical in the coming decades. To facilitate their application
and acceptance, we need to stop providing incentives for outdated and Solar. Solar technical potential is conservatively estimated at greater than 50
unsustainable fuel technologies and focus instead on the most ecologically terawatt-years per year, or more than three times the current annual global
sustainable renewable sources, notably wind and solar. The combination, in energy use. From 2000 to 2100, solar’s technical potential of 5,000 terawatt-
particular, of vehicle-to-grid system efficiencies and expansion of wind and years is 277% greater than the remaining post-efficiency supply requirements
solar energy offers multiple benefits: reduced cost of energy services; dramatic (i.e., after harnessing the large pool of cost-effective energy-efficiency
reductions in greenhouse gases, acid rain, and urban air pollutants; deep opportunities). This solar technical potential was characterized nearly a decade
reductions in oil imports; and significantly less wilderness habitat converted ago, and faster market developments indicate this potential will increase over
and fresh water diverted to grow fuel crops. time as continuous scientific advancements and technological breakthroughs
It will also take ambitious research, development, and demonstration are able to capture an ever-larger fraction of the theoretical potential of
initiatives, coupled with market-based incentives and innovative regulatory 124,000 terawatt-years, or nearly 4 million exajoules per year.
policies, to ensure the timely availability of economically attractive and
affordable renewables on a global scale throughout this century. Wind. Wind technical potential is more than 20 terawatt-years per year, or
more than 134% of the current annual global energy use. From 2000 to 2100,
Abundant Options wind’s technical potential of 2,000 terawatt-years is more than 110% greater
Current global energy consumption is about 15 terawatt-years or 475 exajoules, than the remaining (post-efficiency) supply requirements. About 1–2% of the
the equivalent of oil supertanker shipments arriving at the rate of one every energy coming from the sun is converted into wind energy. Wind’s theoretical
ten minutes, or the distribution of fuel to service stations by 437 million potential is 2,476 terawatt-years, or 78,000 exajoules per year.
delivery trucks per year. Projected energy consumption worldwide from 2000
to 2100, assuming no change in human behavior, is approximately 240 times Geothermal. Geothermal technical potential is about 160 terawatt-years per
the current amount—about 3,600 terawatt-years or 113,000 exajoules. Fossil year, or more than ten times the current annual global energy use. The Earth’s
fuels, also assuming no change in human behavior, would account for three- interior reaches temperatures greater than 4,000°C, and this geothermal energy
fourths of this sum, releasing several trillion tons of greenhouse gases, while flows continuously to the surface. From 2000 to 2100, geothermal’s technical
tripling the Earth’s atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases (in carbon- potential of 16,000 terawatt-years is 900% greater than the remaining (post-
dioxide equivalents) from pre-industrial levels. efficiency) supply requirements. Geothermal’s theoretical potential worldwide

78

Climate4Life.indb 78 6/27/08 7:44:09 PM


RENEWABLES

differences between different layers of the ocean


(called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion). More
research remains to be done on the ecological
impacts of the options on marine life, and these
technologies may play a niche role for some island
and coastal communities.

Hydropower. Hydropower’s technical potential is


1.6 terawatt-years per year, or a bit over 10% of
current annual global energy use. From 2000 to
2100, hydro’s technical potential of 160 terawatt-
years is 9% of the remaining (post-efficiency)
is 440,000 terawatt-years, or 14 million exajoules per year. Domestic resources supply requirements. This potential is further limited by serious ecological,
in the United States are equivalent to a 30,000-year energy supply at the social, and climatic problems associated with some river sites.
current rate of consumption.
Counting the Costs
Biomass. Biomass technical potential is 8.6 terawatt-years per year, or 57% of Not surprisingly, much of the lively and contentious debate over future
current annual global energy use. From 2000 to 2100, biomass’s technical energy supplies tends to reduce itself to one key criterion: cost. This is myopic
potential of 860 terawatt-years is 48% of the remaining (post-efficiency) for two reasons. First, assumptions about long-term technological cost and
supply requirements. On average, plant net primary production (NPP) is performance data inherently contain a fair degree of subjective judgment. The
about 5 million calories per square meter per year. An important caveat about future is uncertain in too many ways, precluding any technical assessment to
biomass availability is that global NPP is the amount of energy available to claim complete objectivity or certitude. Moreover, current views on technology
all subsequent links in critical ecosystem services plus the food, fiber, animal options are heavily conditioned by the long trail of public interventions and
feed, and biofuel chain. The Earth’s surface area is about 500 trillion m2. The subventions shaping markets and investment patterns. For humanity to avoid
net power output stored by plants is thus 19 terawatt-years, or 0.01% (1/100th catastrophic climate change, and avert conflicts and wars over oil resources,
of 1%) of the sun’s power emitted to Earth. there will need to be a dramatic change in the calculus of energy policy-
making and investment decision-making. This means it is a wide-open arena
Oceans. Ocean power’s technical potential (more than 80% from thermal for all energy options, even the current energy giants, since the accumulated
energy conversion) is 5 terawatt-years per year, or one-third of current annual rules and subsidies currently in place are now facing a radical makeover to
global energy use. From 2000 to 2100, the ocean’s technical potential of 500 align outcomes for climate-positive, real energy-security results (DeCanio,
terawatt-years is 27% of the remaining (post-efficiency) supply requirements. 2003; Smil, 2003).
There are various potential ocean technologies, such as harnessing the power of Second, cost and climate emissions are just two criteria among many for
underwater currents, tidal flows, wave motion, and exploiting the temperature ensuring a sustainable smart-energy system worldwide this century. There

79

Climate4Life.indb 79 6/27/08 7:44:15 PM


A CLIMATE FOR LIFE

The cooling towers of a nuclear power plant frame a


traditional windmill in St. Laurent des Eaux in France’s Loire
Valley. Contemporary wind turbines, designed with state-
of-the-art technologies, now deliver electricity at several
times lower cost than nuclear power. THOMAS HOEPKER

is a rich literature developed in the wake of innumerable energy crises over some intractable or intrinsic to the energy option, that have been costly to
the past forty years stressing important attributes that should be sought in human well-being and ecological health.
energy services to achieve a high probability of avoiding adverse impacts and For example, hydroelectric power is promoted as the most cost-effective
unintended consequences (Lovins and Lovins, 1982; Lovins et al., 2004; Smil, renewable energy solution for climate change. This is grossly misleading and
2003). A dozen criteria recur as important attributes of energy supplies: highly inaccurate. Actual measurements of hydrodams in different parts of
the world indicate they are responsible for an estimated 8% of total global
• Is it economically affordable, even for the poorest of the poor
greenhouse gas emissions, and projected expansion in coming decades, mostly
and cash-strapped?
in wilderness areas, could increase this to 15% of total emissions (St. Louis
• Is it safe through its entire life cycle?
et al., 2000). Hydrodams have also been the major reason why one-fourth of
• Is it clean through its entire lifespan?
freshwater species have been driven to extinction worldwide (Bräutigam, 1999)
• Is its risk low and manageable during financial and price volatility?
This is not to say that all hydro facilities release greenhouse gas emissions. Not
• Is it resilient and flexible to volatility, surprises, miscalculations,
all hydroelectric plants require dams, and not all dams generate electricity.
and human error?
And clearly other extenuating circumstances come into play (e.g., the need for
• Is it ecologically sustainable, with no adverse impacts on
irrigation) (WCD, 2000).
biodiversity?
This reinforces the point that using multiple criteria to prioritize preferable
• Is it environmentally benign in that it maintains air, water, and
energy options this century, coupled with the alignment of public policies
soil quality?
and regulations towards this end, is imperative given the looming threat of
• Will it fail gracefully, not catastrophically, in response to abrupt
climate catastrophe in need of fast and massive action, while at the same
surprises or crises?
time avoiding wars and conflicts over the accelerating demand for vulnerable
• Will it rebound easily and swiftly from failures, with low recovery
oil supplies; avoiding and reversing the contamination of air, water, and soil;
cost and limited lost time?
avoiding nuclear weapons proliferation; and preventing the destruction of
• Does it have endogenous learning capacity, with intrinsic new
wildlife and biodiversity loss.
productivity opportunities?
In addition, we must now take into account the increasing occurrence of
• Does it have a robust experience curve for reducing negative
climate-triggered mega-droughts, super-hurricanes, deluge-level floods, larger
externalities and amplifying positive externalities,
and longer wildfires, more widespread pest devastation, and the adverse
including scalable innovation possibilities?
impacts these will have on energy installations. It is also prudent in a post-
• Is it an uninteresting target for malicious disruption,
9/11 world—where nuclear reactors and large refineries now remain on
off the radar of terrorists and military planners?
constant alert to possible terrorist attacks—to design energy systems that are
Among the range of available energy options, only energy services from uninteresting targets (Romm, 2007).
efficiency gains rank at the top in every attribute. All other options are
deficient or weak in two or more of these attributes. The vast expansion of Proper Investment and the Future of Renewables
energy consumption from coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear, hydrodams, and In spite of renewables’ overwhelming potential, existing public policies—as well
wood and crops over the past century has revealed a series of grave problems, as the majority of future-looking global energy assessments—reflect negligible

80

Climate4Life.indb 80 6/27/08 7:44:16 PM


RENEWABLES

Moreover, nuclear power continues to receive


unprecedented taxpayer-subsidized insurance
coverage for reactor disasters. A similar taxpayer
burden is now being proposed to underwrite
federally assumed liability of a century-long
leakage risk from carbon capture and storage
projects. Likewise, the fossil fuel industries have
received considerable largesse and investment
stability as a result of long-standing subsidies,
while emerging competitive options like wind
power suffer financial instability because the
Production Tax Credit is sunset every few years,
roles for solar, wind, and geothermal energy sources or the ambitious efficiency wreaking havoc by disrupting investment flows (Koplow and Dernbach,
gains posited in Chapter 1. On the contrary, they emphasize massive fossil 2001).
fuel carbon capture and storage (CCS) operations, aggressive nuclear power In sharp contrast, however, is the attention that many other nations, as
expansion, enormous biomass plantations, and large-scale hydro development well as a number of U.S. states, have focused on the future of renewables to
(Hamrin, Hummel, and Canapa, 2007). This is due less to technical or meet the range of environmental, economic, social, and security criteria noted
economic constraints than to institutional and political inertia. above. There is a growing body of literature describing that future, including
Over the past half century, governments have provided (and continue to policy targets and shifts in financial incentives based on insights gleaned
provide) several trillion dollars per decade in subsidies—nearly two-thirds from socio-economic and technology scenarios, carbon-constrained scenarios,
have been dedicated to fossil fuels (mostly to coal and oil) and one-fourth and future social visions. Policy targets for future shares of renewable energy
to nuclear power. Only 5% went to all non-hydro renewables (solar thermal, are described for regions, specific countries, states/provinces, and cities. By
solar-electric photovoltaics, solar-thermal-electric “concentrated solar power” 2020, many targets and scenarios show a 20–35% share of electricity from
systems, terrestrial wind, offshore wind farms, geothermal heat, geothermal- renewables, increasing to 50–80% by 2050 under the highest scenarios
electric) and all efficiency (buildings, transportation, appliances, industry, (Martinot et al., 2007).
combined heat and power). For each U.S. tax dollar supporting wind power or Two scenarios with very ambitious efficiency and renewable goals were
solar power research and development over the past fifty years, nuclear power released in 2007 by the European Renewable Energy Commission (EREC,
received 100 times more. Even in the U.S. 2008 federal appropriations, wind 2007) and by the American Solar Energy Society (ASES, 2007), the latter
power research and development funding was $40 million vs. $400 million limited to the United States. The European Renewable Energy Commission
for nuclear. This makes no sense given the fact that wind power generates projects 70% renewables in the electric sector (while constraining nuclear
electricity already competitive to nuclear reactors and has a global technical and large hydro), and the American Solar Energy Society forecasts 50%
potential that could provide twice the level of total global energy needs this renewables in the U.S. electricity sector by 2030 (also ignoring nuclear and
century (in combination with ambitious efficiency gains) (GWEC, 2006). large hydro). The high penetration rates are directly due to the fact that both

81

Climate4Life.indb 81 6/27/08 7:44:17 PM


A CLIMATE FOR LIFE

An electric Smart Car advertises the New York City Marathon


in Midtown Manhattan’s Times Square. Using plug-in hybrid
technology, the electricity infrastructure in the United States
could potentially power the daily use of 84% of the nation’s
cars, pickup trucks, and SUVs. CHUCK PEFLEY

reports estimate half or more of total energy supply being displaced through use these complementary strengths, and to reconcile the complementary needs
lower-cost energy-efficiency gains—by a factor of four to one in the case of of the driver and grid manager” (Kempton and Tomić, 2005).
the EREC projects. As discussed in the chapter on efficiency and smart energy services, the
The ASES report is highly transparent and richly detailed and strongly existing U.S. grid could recharge 80% of America’s 200+ million vehicle fleet
demonstrates that energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies if they were plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, without having to build a new
have the potential to provide most, if not all, of the U.S. carbon emissions power plant. This would have the positive effect of eliminating 52% of U.S.
reductions that will be needed to help stabilize the atmospheric concentration oil imports (340 billion liters per year) worth some $350 billion savings at the
of greenhouse gases (Hamrin, Hummel, and Canapa, 2007). However, while gas pump, while also reducing total U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by 27%
some renewable options accrue multiple benefits and positive externalities (PNNL, 2007).
and should be encouraged, other renewable options trigger adverse impacts or As with the market diffusion rate of any major technological innovation
incur negative tradeoffs. This is especially the case when a supply option like (accelerated to some degree by favorable public policies and incentives),
biofuels is vastly expanded over space and time. declining manufacturing costs and vehicle prices will occur with accumulated
High oil prices have driven policymakers to set high production targets experience of scaled-up production. Researchers note another tremendous
and enact lavish subsidies for investors to develop biofuels from agricultural benefit of vehicle-to-grid over time, as production costs drop: providing
crops. Mobile liquid biofuels—both ethanol derived from corn and sugarcane battery storage for intermittent wind power and solar electricity generation.
and biodiesel derived from oil palm, soybean, and rapeseed—are not only Research calculations suggest that vehicle-to-grid could stabilize large-scale
more expensive than vehicle efficiency gains by a factor of two to five (Lovins (one-half of U.S. electricity) wind power with 3% of the fleet dedicated to
et al., 2004), but also more expensive than system efficiency gains achievable regulation for wind, plus 8% to 38% of the fleet providing operating reserves
by connecting plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to the national electricity grid or storage for wind (Kempton and Tomić, 2005). For context, currently half
system. Genetically modified fuels of the future are likely to lower production of U.S. electricity is coal-fired.
costs, but pose many of the same ecological issues associated with current The vehicle-to-grid technological revolution is driven by many of the same
biofuels (Jacobson, 2007). digital electronics and advanced materials that enable production and operation
of high-efficiency, lower energy-consuming smart appliances, smart grids,
Preeminent Solutions: Electric Vehicles smart buildings, and smart cars. It offers an economic development strategy
Research and developments over the past two decades in the production of for developed and developing countries alike. With the majority of the world’s
electric vehicles and separately in the commercialization of hybrid-electric population becoming urban-based, electric and hybrid-electric vehicles can
vehicles have given rise to the recognition that plugging vehicles into the grid accommodate the typical urban driving cycles of 16 to 48 kilometers per day.
system would accrue several remarkable benefits far superior to continuing to Longer distances can be provided by the flexible fuel component derived from
run vehicles entirely on mobile liquid fuels. As researchers have pointed out, local and regional biowastes.
“The vehicle fleet has twenty times the power capacity, less than one-tenth the
utilization, and one-tenth the capital cost per prime mover kilowatt. Conversely, The Role of Biofuels
utility generators have ten to fifty times longer an operating life and lower Local and regional biowastes can be converted to biofuels, providing the
operating costs per kilowatt-hour. To tap Vehicle-to-Grid is to synergistically mobile fuels essential for long-range driving beyond electric battery capacity.

82

Climate4Life.indb 82 6/27/08 7:44:17 PM


RENEWABLES

renewable resources; accumulated scientific


knowledge also gives good indication they will
incur the smallest climate and ecological footprints
when scaled up globally and operated over long
time periods. Solar photovoltaics and wind power
have the added advantage of requiring 95% less
water per terawatt-year than coal or nuclear power,
biopower or solar-thermal-electric “concentrated
solar power” (CSP) systems.
In a vehicle-to-grid connected world, with
solar and wind power stored in the mass
distribution of plug-in hybrid electric batteries,
Such a modest use of biofuels would prevent some of the near-intractable sixty and thirty times less land area, respectively, would be needed than in
problems associated with large-scale biofuel consumption. the case of biofuels for the same power output (Jacobson, 2007). Roughly
Unfortunately, one unintended negative consequence of corn-based 7% of the U.S.’s 50 million hectares of urban land area covered with solar
ethanol expansion in the United States is that it drives soy production to photovoltaic panels at today’s 10%-efficient systems could provide 100% of
Brazil and Argentina (where it is grown mainly for animal feed), which leads U.S. electricity. Brownfields could provide most of the land area. Building-
to deforestation and destruction of biodiversity-rich savannah grasslands integrated photovoltaic systems (BIPVs) could provide half of the power
and Amazon ecosystems (CARD, 2007; Searchinger et al., 2008; Fargione et (Kazmerski, 2002; Zweibel, 2004). Alternatively, around 2.5% of the North
al., 2008). Similarly, oil palm plantations in tropical countries, already one American Great Plains with dispersed wind farms—or roughly 92 million
of the major causes of biodiversity loss, are the preferred low-cost feedstock out of 363 million hectares—could provide 100% of U.S. electricity. The
for biodiesel. Some of the last remaining intact wilderness habitats for actual footprint of the several hundred thousand multi-megawatt turbines,
mega-charismatic species like the orangutan and the Sumatran tiger, and hypothetically squeezed into one spot, would be less than the size of one large
also rhino and elephant are threatened with conversion to oil palm. Species Wyoming coal strip mine (Komanoff, 2006; Williams, 2001). Even when
extinction will be the outcome of people “putting an orangutan in your spaced out to optimize wind capture, 90% of the 2.5% could still be farmed,
tank.” ranched, or ecologically restored.
Minimizing biofuel expansion reduces the adverse impacts on ecosystems Several valuable benefits would accrue to rural communities from such
and biodiversity loss in tropical countries already being caused by ethanol and a strategy. Farmers and ranchers can earn, on average, twice as much from
biodiesel plantation growth (Morton et al., 2006; Fearnside, 2002; Killeen, wind farm royalty payments than they currently obtain from crop and
2007). It also avoids driving up food prices (CARD, 2007). animal farming. Currently 75% of the Great Plains is farmed or ranched,
but only generates 5% of the region’s economic output. Shifting to wind
Harnessing the Sun and the Wind farming could produce twice as much economic output on thirty-five times
Solar, wind, and geothermal energy systems are not only the three largest less land area. Similarly, vast wind resources are available in China and

83

Climate4Life.indb 83 6/27/08 7:44:18 PM


A CLIMATE FOR LIFE

The people of Hveragerdi, in southwest Iceland, use


geothermal energy to heat their greenhouses. Geothermal
heat in Iceland is also used for swimming pools, to bake
bread, and to heat up footpaths, streets, and parking spaces.
ARCTIC-IMAGES/CORBIS

India, as well as along coastal regions throughout the world (Totten, 2007; megawatts of combined heat and power could be online in several years if a
GWEC, 2006; NREL, 2006). China and India will account for 80% of number of important power sector reforms occur (WADE, 2004).
coal increase by 2030. China annually expands its coal use equivalent to For nations like China facing water crises, combined heat and power offers
that of the United Kingdom. It surpassed the United States in 2007 as a highly cost-effective system efficiency option for combining the delivery of
the world’s top greenhouse gas emitter. However, China’s wind technical energy and potable water. Water consumes considerable energy throughout
potential is estimated at 2 million megawatts, 400% larger than China’s the process of extracting, pumping, distributing, heating, and disposing.
total electric generation capacity. In addition, twice as much solar energy In California, for example, 20% of the electricity and one-third of natural
lands on China each year than could be produced from its 800 billion tons gas are consumed by the water sector (NRDC and Pacific Institute, 2004).
of coal over the next several centuries. Delivering water services efficiently saves money, reduces air pollution, and
cuts greenhouse gases. China faces the additional problem that its water
Economies of Efficiency—Combining Heat and Power resources per capita may decline to around 1,700 cubic meters by 2050, which
Instead of targeting massive investments into central, large-scale, coal, nuclear, is the threshold of severe water scarcity. Water shortage already has become a
and hydroelectric generating stations, cities around the world should be critical constraint for socio-economic development in northern China, where
looking for energy system efficiencies that could enable phasing in use of local per capita levels are now below 300 cubic meters. To solve or eliminate water
and regional biological wastes over the long-term. One of the proven options shortage problems, China is now pursuing all water-efficiency opportunities
available globally is decentralized combined heat and power. Whereas central (e.g., drip irrigation) that can cut water use by two-thirds on farms (which
thermal power plants vent 70% of the energy when generating electricity, consume 80% of all water).
combined heat and power systems capture this waste heat to cogenerate
two, three, or four different energy services (heat, steam, electricity, cooling). Alternative Water Supplies
Moreover, in being sited close to the point of use, combined heat and power Meanwhile, wastewater and seawater desalination are drawing more and
systems require significantly less transmission and distribution investment more attention from researchers and policy-makers as alternative water supply
than centralized power plants, as well as avoiding the 15% transmission and sources (Zhou and Tol, 2003).
distribution line losses (WADE, 2004). For example, just the waste heat Desalination costs currently vary by a factor of seven or more, depending on
discarded from U.S. power plants is equivalent to 1.2 times Japan’s total the type of feedwater (brackish, waste, or seawater), the available concentrate
energy use. disposal options, the proximity to distribution systems, and the availability
Recent assessments indicate that if China moved to 100% high-efficiency and cost of power. Desalination’s primary operating cost is for power. One
decentralized combined heat and power systems by 2021, retail and capital cubic kilometer (one trillion liters) of wastewater or seawater desalination
cost savings could reach $400 billion. At no extra cost, new emissions of requires about 500 megawatts of power. The reduction in unit energy use by
carbon dioxide would drop 56%, avoiding 400 million tons of such emissions desalination plants has been among the most dramatic improvements in recent
per year, and nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide emissions would decline by years due to improvement in energy recovery systems. Estimates considered
90%. But these results are possible only if the Chinese government adopts valid for China today range from a cost of $0.60 per cubic meter (1,000 liters)
key policies enabling a faster rate of implementation than the current annual for brackish and wastewater desalination to $1 per cubic meter for seawater
combined heat and power addition of 3,000 megawatts. Some 100,000 desalination by reverse osmosis (Zhi, Totten, and Chou, 2006).

84

Climate4Life.indb 84 6/27/08 7:44:18 PM


RENEWABLES

operate reverse osmosis technologies to purify


these wastewaters, while also providing ancillary
energy services like space and water heating and
cooling.

The Final Hope


As the chapter on efficiency and smart energy
services describes, ensuring the capture of the
immense pool of efficiency opportunities could
deliver more than half of the world’s cumulative
energy services at lower cost and risk than
expanding energy supplies, replacing the need
Extrapolating from technological trends, and given the promise of for 1,800 terawatt-years or 57,000 exajoules of energy supplies. Envision
ongoing innovations in lower-cost, higher-performance membranes, seawater eliminating the need for 13.8 billion coal railcars this century. However, that
desalination costs will continue to fall. The average cost may decline to still leaves a demand for another 1,800 terawatt-years or 57,000 exajoules of
$0.30 per cubic meter in 2025. For comparison, China’s average (subsidized) energy supply. A lively debate has ensued as to the best options for satisfying
water prices are $0.25 per cubic meter for domestic and industrial use, $0.34 this immense growth.
per cubic meter for commercial use, $0.60 per cubic meter in Tianjin and Smarter delivery of energy services through efficiency gains can effectively
Dalian, and approaching $0.80 per cubic meter at full pricing in cities like satisfy most of this growth, while saving money and reducing emissions
Beijing. provide ancillary benefits. Combining these with steady increases in harnessing
Desalination of wastewater via combined heat and power can capture energy services powered by wind, solar, geothermal, and biowastes promises
double benefits: it reduces contaminated discharges into rivers and, instead, society a long-term, clean, safe, secure, and ecologically sound energy system.
expands the city’s freshwater supplies at lower cost than importing remote water Achieving this ambitious but feasible outcome is fundamental for resolving
resources. The Reverse Osmosis membrane process is universally considered climate and energy crises, while bringing all of humanity to health and
to be the most promising technology for brackish and seawater desalination well-being and preventing the unnecessary extinction of the planet’s rich
A model of using reverse osmosis membranes powered by combined heat and biodiversity of plants and animals.
power is the Ashkelon plant in Israel, which produces 100 million cubic meters
per year of potable water at a highly cost-effective 50 cents per cubic meter.
China’s total wastewater discharges annually exceed 60 cubic kilometers (60
trillion liters). As of the late 1990s, less than one-seventh of this wastewater
was treated. Close to 600 million Chinese people have water supplies that are
contaminated by animal and human waste. Harnessing 30,000 megawatts
of co-generation available in cities and industrial facilities potentially could

85

Climate4Life.indb 85 6/27/08 7:44:18 PM

View publication stats

You might also like