Johnson 7e Sarq 19
Johnson 7e Sarq 19
Johnson 7e Sarq 19
19.5. How does the idea of repeated sampling relate to the concept of a sampling
distribution?
Repeated sampling involves drawing many or all possible samples from a population which
leads to a sampling distribution.
19.6. Which of the two types of estimation do you like the most, and why?
This is an opinion question.
Point estimation is nice because it provides an exact point estimate of the population
value. It provides you with the single best guess of the value of the population
parameter.
Interval estimation is nice because it allows you to make statements of confidence
that an interval will include the true population value.
19.7. What are the advantages of using interval estimation rather than point
estimation?
Johnson, Educational Research, 7e
SAGE Publishing, 2020
The problem with using a point estimate is that although it is the single best guess you can
make about the value of a population parameter, it is also usually wrong.
Take a look at the sampling distribution of the mean on page 554 and note that in that
case if you would have guessed $50,000 as the correct value (and this WAS the
correct value in this case) you would be wrong most of the time.
A major advantage of using interval estimation is that you provide a range of values
with a known probability of capturing the population parameter (e.g., if you obtain
from SPSS a 95% confidence interval you can claim to have 95% confidence that it
will include the true population parameter).
An interval estimate (i.e., confidence intervals) also helps one to not be so confident
that the population value is exactly equal to the single point estimate. That is, it
makes us more careful on how we interpret our data and helps keep us in proper
perspective.
Actually, perhaps the best thing of all to do is to provide both the point estimate and
the interval estimate. For example, our best estimate of the population mean is the
value $32,640 (the point estimate) and our 95% confidence interval is $30,913.71 to
$34,366.29.
By the way, note that the bigger your sample size, the more narrow the confidence
interval will be.
If you want to narrow (i.e., very precise) confidence intervals, then remember to
include a lot of participants in your research study.
19.9. To whom is the researcher similar to in hypothesis testing: the defense attorney
or the prosecuting attorney? Why?
The researcher is similar to the prosecuting attorney is the sense that the researcher brings
the null hypothesis “to trial” when he or she believes there is a probability of strong evidence
against the null.
Just as the prosecutor usually believes that the person on trial is not innocent, the
researcher usually believes that the null hypothesis is not true.
In the court system, the jury must assume (by law) that the person is innocent until
the evidence clearly calls this assumption into question; analogously, in hypothesis
testing the researcher must assume (in order to use hypothesis testing) that the null
hypothesis is true until the evidence calls this assumption into question.
19.10. What is the difference between a probability value and the significance level?
Johnson, Educational Research, 7e
SAGE Publishing, 2020
Basically in hypothesis testing, the goal is to see if the probability value is less than or equal
to the significance level (i.e., is p ≤ alpha).
The probability value (also called the p-value) is the probability of the observed result
found in your research study of occurring (or an even more extreme result occurring),
under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true (i.e., if the null were true).
Note that the probability value is the most important concept in hypothesis testing.
Make sure you know what it means and what it does not mean!
In hypothesis testing, the researcher assumes that the null hypothesis is true and then
sees how often the observed finding would occur if this assumption were true (i.e.,
the researcher determines the p-value).
The significance level (also called the alpha level) is the cutoff value the researcher
selects and then uses to decide when to reject the null hypothesis.
Most researchers select the significance or alpha level of 0.05 to use in their research;
hence, they reject the null hypothesis when the p-value (which is obtained from the
computer printout) is less than or equal to 0.05.
The key idea of hypothesis testing is that you reject the null hypothesis when the p-
value is less than or equal to the significance level of 0.05.
19.11. Why do educational researchers usually use 0.05 as their significance level?
It has become part of the statistical hypothesis testing culture.
It is a longstanding convention.
It reflects a concern over making type I errors (i.e., wanting to avoid the situation
where you reject the null when it is true, that is, wanting to avoid “false positive”
errors).
If you set the significance level at 0.05, then you will only reject a true null
hypothesis 5% or the time (i.e., you will only make a type I error 5% of the time) in
the long run.
19.13. Do the following statements sound like typical null or alternative hypotheses? (a)
The coin is fair. (b) There is no difference between male and female incomes in the
population. (c) There is no correlation in the population. (d) The patient is not sick (i.e.,
is well). (e) The defendant is innocent.
All of these sound like null alternative hypotheses (i.e., the “nothing new” or “status quo”
hypothesis). We usually assume that a coin is fair in games of chance; when testing the
difference between male and female incomes in hypothesis testing, we assume the null of no
difference; when testing the statistical significance of a correlation coefficient using
hypothesis testing, we assume that the correlation in the population is zero; in medical testing
Johnson, Educational Research, 7e
SAGE Publishing, 2020
we assume the person does not have the illness until the medical tests suggest otherwise; and
in our system of jurisprudence we assume that a defendant is innocent until the evidence
strongly suggests otherwise.
19.14. What is a Type I error? What is a Type II error? How can you minimize the risk
of both of these types of errors?
In hypothesis testing, there are two possible errors we can make: Type I and Type II errors.
A Type I error occurs when you reject a true null hypothesis (remember that when the
null hypothesis is true, you hope to retain it); it is also called a “false positive.”
A Type II error occurs when you fail to reject a false null hypothesis (remember that
when the null hypothesis is false, you hope to reject it); it is also called a “false
negative.” The best way to allow yourself to set a low alpha level (i.e., to have a small
chance of making a Type I error) and to have a good chance of rejecting the null
when it is false (i.e., to have a small chance of making a Type II error) is to increase
the your sample size.
The key in hypothesis testing is to use a large sample in your research study rather
than a small sample!
If you do reject your null hypothesis, then it is also essential that you determine
whether the size of the relationship is practically significant (see the next question).
19.16. How do you write the null and alternative hypotheses for each of the following:
(a) The t test for independent samples, (b) One-way analysis of variance, (c) The t test
for correlation coefficients?, (d) The t test for a regression coefficient.
In each of these, the null hypothesis says there is no relationship and the alternative
hypothesis says that there is a relationship.
(A) In this case, the null hypothesis says that the two population means (i.e., mu one and
mu two) are equal; the alternative hypothesis says that they are not equal.
Johnson, Educational Research, 7e
SAGE Publishing, 2020
(B) In this case, the null hypothesis says that all of the population means are equal; the
alternative hypothesis says that at least two of the means are not equal.
(C) In this case, the null hypothesis says that the population correlation (i.e., rho) is zero;
the alternative hypothesis says that it is not equal to zero.
(D) In this case, the null hypothesis says that the population regression coefficient (beta)
is zero, and the alternative says that it is not equal to zero.
You can see the examples of these null and alternative hypotheses written out in symbolic
form for cases A, B, C, and D in Table 19.2.