BA Notes Chapter6
BA Notes Chapter6
BLENDING MODELS,
Linear optimization, is also known as linear programming (LP), is a method used to achieve the best
outcome (such as maximum profit or lowest cost) in a mathematical model whose requirements are
represented by linear relationships. It involves maximizing or minimizing a linear objective function,
subject to a set of linear constraints.
Key Components:
2. Decision Variables: These represent the unknowns that affect the objective function.
Let’s assume a company produces two types of products: Product A and Product B. The company
wants to determine how many units of each product to produce to maximize its profit.
Let:
The profit for each unit of Product A is $5, and the profit for each unit of Product B is $3. The
objective is to maximize the total profit, which is given by:
Maximize Z =5x1+3x2
Where Z is the total profit.
1. Material Availability:
2x1+x2 ≤ 100
2. Labor Availability:
3x1+2x2≤120
Non-negativity Constraint: The number of units of Product A and Product B cannot be negative:
x1≥0, x2≥0
Step 4: Linear Programming Model
Maximize Z =5x1+3x2
Subject to:
2x1+x2 ≤ 100
3x1+2x2≤120
x1≥0, x2≥0
Excel's Solver is a powerful tool used to solve optimization problems, such as linear programming
(LP). In linear optimization, the goal is to maximize or minimize a given objective function, subject to
constraints.
1. Define Decision Variables: Input cells represent the decision variables (e.g., quantities of
products to produce).
2. Formulate the Objective Function: Create a formula to express the goal (e.g., maximize
profit or minimize cost) based on the decision variables.
3. Set Constraints: Define the limitations on resources (e.g., raw materials or labor), which are
expressed as inequalities in other cells.
4. Open Solver: Go to the Data tab, click Solver, and configure the parameters. Set the
objective to the cell containing the objective function, select maximize or minimize, and
specify the decision variable cells.
6. Select Simplex LP as the solving method for linear problems and click Solve.
Solver will calculate the optimal values for the decision variables, helping you find the best solution
while satisfying all constraints. It is widely used in business, finance, and operations research for
tasks like maximizing profit or minimizing cost.
A manual approach would involve adjusting the decision variables in a spreadsheet and checking if
they meet the constraints, but this method is time-consuming and unreliable for finding an optimal
solution. To guarantee an optimal solution, a systematic mathematical approach is required.
Fortunately, Excel provides a tool called Solver, which is designed to handle these optimization
problems. Solver allows users to set the objective function, define decision variables, and include
constraints. It then uses advanced algorithms to find the optimal solution.
The Premium Solver, developed by Frontline Systems, is an enhanced version of the standard Excel
Solver. It offers better performance, greater accuracy, and improved reporting. While the standard
Solver is sufficient for many optimization problems, the Premium Solver offers additional features
and is recommended for more complex models.
1. Feasible Region:
• The feasible region is the area on a graph where all the constraints of the problem overlap. It
represents all possible combinations of the decision variables that satisfy the constraints.
• Each constraint is plotted as a straight line, and the region that satisfies the constraint lies on
one side of the line.
• The feasible region is bounded by these constraint lines and is typically a polygon. The
solutions to the problem must lie within this region.
2. Objective Function:
• It is usually expressed in the form Z=c1x1+c2x2 , where Z is the value to optimize, and x1 and x2
are the decision variables.
• The goal is to find the point in the feasible region where the objective function achieves its
highest (or lowest) value.
Increase in Material Supply: If the company can acquire more raw material, how much would profit
increase? By adjusting the material constraint (e.g., from 100 to 110 units) and re-solving, managers
can see if the additional investment is worthwhile.
Increase in Labor Hours: If more labour hours become available, what would the impact be on
production and profit? By updating the labour constraint (e.g., from 120 to 140 hours), managers can
determine if hiring temporary workers would be beneficial.
If the profit per unit of Product A decreases from $5 to $4, how much does the total profit drop? This
type of analysis helps in strategic planning, especially when market conditions force a price change.
• Binding Constraints: Constraints that limit the optimal solution. If the material constraint is
binding, increasing material availability could significantly improve profit.
• Shadow Prices: The value of obtaining one more unit of a resource. For example, if the
shadow price of raw material is $2, acquiring an extra unit could increase profit by $2.
This analysis allows managers to make data-driven decisions, prioritize resource allocation, and
explore strategic opportunities effectively.
Formulating optimization models can be complex, particularly when it comes to identifying the
appropriate constraints. Understanding the different types of constraints is crucial for effective model
building. Here are common categories of constraints:
1. Simple Bounds
Examples:
"No more than $10,000 may be invested in stock ABC," mathematically: ABC ≤ 10,000
"At least 350 units of product Y must be produced to meet customer commitments," mathematically:
Y ≥ 350
2. Limitations
o These constraints deal with the allocation of scarce resources, ensuring that resource
usage does not exceed availability.
o Examples:
▪ "The amount shipped from the Austin plant in July cannot exceed the plant’s
capacity."
3. Requirements
▪ "The marketing plan should ensure at least 400 customers are contacted
each month."
4. Proportional Relationships
o Examples:
▪ "The octane rating of gasoline from mixing different crude blends must be at
least 89."
5. Balance Constraints
o These constraints ensure that input equals output, often used in flow or inventory
models to account for material or money movement.
o Examples:
▪ "Production in June plus any available inventory must equal June’s demand
plus inventory held to July."
▪ "The total amount shipped to a distribution center from all plants must
equal the amount shipped from the center to all customers."
▪ "The total amount of money invested or saved in March must equal the
amount available at the end of February."
• Objective: The goal is usually to minimize cost or maximize profit while meeting production
requirements and adhering to resource limitations.
Example Scenario
Suppose a company needs to decide whether to manufacture a product in-house or outsource the
production. Here is a simplified illustration of how a process selection model could be formulated:
2. Objective Function:
o The objective might be to minimize the total cost of production, which includes the
cost of producing in-house and the cost of subcontracting.
Minimize Z=c1x1+c2x2
o Here, c1 is the cost per unit for in-house production, and c2 is the cost per unit for
outsourcing.
3. Constraints:
o Capacity Constraint: Limit the number of units that can be produced in-house based
on available resources. x1 ≤In-house Capacity
• Cost-Benefit Analysis: The model helps compare the costs of in-house production versus
outsourcing, guiding decisions based on financial outcomes.
• Flexibility and Risk Management: Process selection models can also evaluate the trade-offs
between flexibility and risk, such as the reliability of suppliers and the impact on quality.
By using these models, companies can make informed decisions that optimize resource use and align
with strategic objectives.
Blending problems are a common type of optimization model where several raw materials with
different characteristics are combined to produce a final product that meets specific requirements or
specifications. These problems are prevalent in industries such as dietary planning, gasoline and oil
refining, coal production, fertilizer manufacturing, and many other sectors that deal with bulk
commodities.
• Objective: The goal is often to minimize cost or maximize profit while satisfying the
constraints related to the properties or proportions of the raw materials.
• Proportional Constraints: These are a defining feature of blending problems and ensure that
the mixture meets desired specifications, such as nutritional content, quality standards, or
chemical composition.
A refinery needs to blend two types of crude oil to produce gasoline. The two types of crude oil have
different costs and properties:
• Crude Oil A: Cost per barrel is $50 and has an octane rating of 85.
• Crude Oil B: Cost per barrel is $70 and has an octane rating of 95.
• The final gasoline product must have an average octane rating of at least 89.
1. Decision Variables:
2. Objective Function:
Minimize Z=50x1+70x2
3. Constraints:
o Octane Rating Constraint: The average octane rating must be at least 89.
• Cost Efficiency: By finding the optimal mix of raw materials, companies can minimize
production costs while meeting product specifications.
• Quality Assurance: Proportional constraints ensure that the final product maintains the
required quality standards.
• Resource Utilization: These models help in the efficient use of available resources, balancing
cost and quality in production processes.
Blending problems demonstrate the practical use of linear programming in industries where the
composition of a product is crucial for cost-effectiveness and compliance with quality standards.
• Objective: The primary goal is typically to maximize return or minimize risk while meeting
certain investment constraints.
• Decision Variables: Represent the amount of money to be invested in each asset or financial
instrument.
• Constraints: These can include budget limitations, risk exposure limits, or requirements for
diversification.
2. Proportional Constraints: Often used to ensure that the proportions of various investments
meet specific criteria. For example, the percentage of total investment in high-risk assets
may need to be limited to manage risk.
Scenario
The investor wants to maximize the expected return while satisfying the following constraints:
1. No more than 50% of the total investment can be allocated to Stock A (to manage risk).
2. At least 20% of the total investment must be allocated to Bond B (for stability).
3. At least 30% of the total investment must be allocated to Mutual Fund C (for diversification).
1. Decision Variables:
Maximize Z=0.08x1+0.05x2+0.06x3
3. Constraints:
• Return Optimization: The model helps determine the optimal allocation of funds to
maximize expected returns within the given risk and diversification parameters.
• Scenario Analysis: Investors can modify the constraints or expected returns to analyze the
impact of market changes or different investment strategies.
These models are powerful tools for financial planning and investment strategy, providing a
structured approach to achieving financial objectives while managing risk and ensuring
diversification.