A SEMINAR PAPER ON

TOPIC: CHALLENGES FACED BY MEDIA PRACTITIONERS IN THE LIGHT OF

TRUTH-TELLING AND FALSEHOOD DICHOTOMY
SUBMITTED TO: REV. THOMAS MATHEW SUBMITTED BY: ABEL K. CHACKO

1. INTRODUCTION
The media scene is becoming more complex, and there is a clearer distinction between telling the
truth and spreading misleading information. It can be difficult for journalists and communicators
to distinguish between fact and fiction because of misinformation, confirmation bias, and time
constraints. These problems include limitations imposed by law and ethics, upholding public
confidence, social context, resource constraints, sensationalism, technological difficulties, and
expectations of the general public. The necessity of media professionals' constant dedication to
the truth is shown by their crucial role in maintaining journalism integrity and the public's trust.
2. DICHOTOMY
A "dichotomy" is a concept or division that represents a sharp contrast or clear distinction
between two opposing or mutually exclusive elements or ideas. It's often used to highlight the
difference or separation between two things that are seen as polar opposites. In the context of the
"truth-telling-falsehood dichotomy," it's a way of emphasizing the sharp divide between
conveying truthful information and spreading falsehoods, illustrating that these are two distinct
and opposing concepts within the realm of communication and information dissemination.
Dichotomies are commonly used in various fields to clarify differences and draw attention to
fundamental distinctions.1

3. TRUTH TELLING-FALSEHOOD DICHOTOMY

The truth-telling-falsehood dichotomy is a concept that highlights the fundamental
distinction between conveying truthful information and spreading falsehoods or misinformation.
In this dichotomy, "truth-telling" refers to the ethical and professional commitment to providing
accurate, objective, and verifiable information to the public. It is a cornerstone of responsible
journalism and ethical communication.
Conversely, "falsehood" refers to the act of conveying information that is inaccurate,
misleading, or deliberately untrue. Falsehoods can take the form of misinformation,
disinformation, or even propaganda, and they can be harmful by distorting reality, manipulating
public opinion, or damaging trust in the media.
The truth-telling-falsehood dichotomy underscores the critical role of media practitioners,
including journalists and communicators, in upholding the truth and maintaining the public's
trust. It also highlights the ethical challenges they face in a world where information can be

1
“Dichotomy Definition & Meaning,” Merriam-Webster, 2023, accessed October 9, 2023, https://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/dichotomy.
easily manipulated and where navigating the line between truth and falsehood is increasingly
complex.2

4. CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED BY MEDIA PROFESSIONALS IN THE

CONTEXT OF TRUTHFULNESS AND FALSEHOOD DISTINCTION

4.1. MISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS

Misinformation and fake news represent one of the most pressing challenges facing
media practitioners in today's digital age. With the advent of social media and the rapid
dissemination of information across online platforms, the spread of false or misleading
information has become alarmingly prevalent. Media practitioners, including journalists and
editors, are confronted with the formidable task of identifying and combating such
misinformation to protect their own credibility and maintain the integrity of journalism as a
whole. Misinformation can take many forms, ranging from innocent errors and misconceptions
to deliberate falsehoods and disinformation campaigns. The speed at which information spreads
on social media amplifies the potential for inaccuracies to gain traction before they can be
verified. In this environment, media practitioners must operate with the utmost caution, as failing
to identify and rectify misinformation can lead to a loss of public trust and confidence. 3
Combatting misinformation is a multifaceted challenge. Media practitioners are tasked
with discerning between credible sources and unreliable ones, fact-checking information, and
verifying the accuracy of claims. However, these tasks are often complicated by the sheer
volume of information circulating online and the sophistication of those who intentionally
disseminate false narratives. Additionally, as the sources of misinformation may have ulterior
motives, such as sowing discord or promoting a specific agenda, media practitioners need to be
diligent in uncovering the underlying intentions behind the dissemination of false information.
The consequences of failing to address misinformation are substantial. Beyond damaging the
credibility of media outlets, it can lead to public confusion, the spread of baseless rumors, and
even the manipulation of public opinion. In some cases, misinformation can have real-world
implications, influencing elections, public health behaviors, and social cohesion.
Media practitioners must, therefore, adopt a proactive and vigilant approach to
combatting misinformation. This includes promoting media literacy among the public, utilizing
fact-checking resources, and adhering to a rigorous code of journalistic ethics. In the age of
digital information, the role of media practitioners in preserving the truth and exposing
falsehoods is more critical than ever, as their actions significantly impact the credibility and
integrity of journalism in the face of this pervasive challenge.

2
Mozibur Ullah, “The Truth-Falsehood Dichotomy and Logic,” Philosophy Stack Exchange, accessed October 9,
2023, https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/14373/the-truth-falsehood-dichotomy-and-logic.
3
Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis, Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online (Amsterdam, Netherlands:
Data and Society Research Institute, 2017), 26.
 One recent example of this is the spread of false information about COVID-19 vaccines.
Various misleading claims and conspiracy theories have been circulated on social media and
other platforms, casting doubt on the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Such false narratives
can erode public trust in the healthcare system and public health efforts, making it challenging
for health authorities and media practitioners to counteract the spread of misinformation and
ensure the public has access to accurate and science-based information.4
4.2. PRESSURE FOR SPEED
The relentless demand for rapid news delivery in the 24/7 news cycle places media
practitioners under significant pressure to publish stories quickly. This urgency can result in
errors and a tendency to bypass thorough verification processes. As a consequence, accuracy
may be compromised, potentially leading to the dissemination of incorrect or incomplete
information. The race to be the first to report breaking news can undermine the fundamental
journalistic principle of ensuring the information's truthfulness and reliability, thus challenging
media practitioners to strike a balance between speed and accuracy in their reporting.5
One recent example in India is the coverage of high-profile events, such as the Hathras
rape case in 2020. In their rush to report breaking news, several media outlets disseminated
information that was later found to be inaccurate or incomplete, causing public outrage and
controversies. This highlights the challenge media practitioners’ face in balancing the need for
speed with the necessity for accuracy, especially in sensitive cases where the consequences of
misinformation can be severe. 6
4.3. CONFIRMATION BIAS
Confirmation bias is a cognitive challenge that journalists may grapple with, whether
intentionally or unknowingly. This bias occurs when individuals, including journalists, tend to
favor information that aligns with their pre-existing beliefs or perspectives. In journalism, this
can result in unintentionally presenting a one-sided or inaccurate narrative because reporters may
subconsciously filter information that confirms their existing views while neglecting
contradictory evidence. This bias can undermine the objectivity and balance crucial to ethical
journalism, making it essential for media practitioners to be self-aware and rigorously examine
their own biases to ensure fair and accurate reporting.7
A recent example is the coverage of the farmer protests in India. Media outlets with
different ideological leanings often presented contrasting narratives, emphasizing information

4
Bill McCarthy, “Fact Checks of 10 Prominent Types of Misinformation about COVID-19 Vaccines,” Poynter,
accessed October 9, 2023, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/fact-checks-of-10-prominent-types-of-
misinformation-about-covid-19-vaccines/.
5
Reiko Saisho, “Speed vs Accuracy in Time of Crisis,” Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, accessed
October 9, 2023, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/speed-vs-accuracy-time-crisis.
6
Pamela Philipose, “Backstory: The Hathras Gangrape and Four Media Challenges ,” The Wire, accessed October 9,
2023, https://thewire.in/media/backstory-hathras-gangrape-four-media-challenges.
7
Paul Bradshaw, “How to Prevent Confirmation Bias Affecting Your Journalism,” Online Journalism Blog,
accessed October 9, 2023, https://onlinejournalismblog.com/2020/04/07/how-to-prevent-confirmation-bias-
affecting-your-journalism/.
that confirmed their existing biases. This made it challenging for the public to access a well-
rounded and objective understanding of the situation. Confirmation bias not only affects the
media but also shapes public perception and debates, highlighting the difficulties faced by media
practitioners in maintaining objectivity amid polarized contexts.
4.4. LEGAL AND ETHICAL CONSTRAINTS
Media practitioners operate within a complex legal and ethical landscape. Laws related to
privacy, defamation, and freedom of the press can differ significantly, making it challenging to
maintain a delicate balance between informing the public and respecting individuals' rights.
While they must uphold the principles of ethical reporting, media professionals also need to
avoid legal pitfalls that could result in lawsuits or infringement of privacy. Navigating this legal
and ethical terrain requires careful consideration and adherence to a stringent code of conduct,
ensuring that journalism remains a responsible and accountable institution in society.8
4.5. MAINTAINING PUBLIC TRUST
Building and preserving public trust is foundational for media outlets. A key element in this
trust is the expectation of truthfulness and accuracy. When media outlets, intentionally or not,
disseminate falsehoods, it can erode the credibility and integrity of journalism. Even
unintentional errors can undermine the audience's confidence in the media. As trust wanes, so
does the media's ability to fulfill its essential role as an informed and unbiased source of
information. To maintain public trust, media practitioners must prioritize rigorous fact-checking,
transparency, and accountability, demonstrating an unwavering commitment to the truth and
ethical reporting.9
4.6. SOCIAL CONTEXT AND POLARIZATION
The socio-political climate significantly impacts how truth and falsehood are perceived. In
today's polarized environment, individuals often interpret information through partisan lenses,
which can lead to accusations of bias against media practitioners. Reporting objective facts can
be viewed as biased by those who hold opposing viewpoints. This challenge makes it difficult for
media professionals to maintain public trust and credibility. Striking a balance between
responsible reporting and navigating the polarized landscape requires finesse, objectivity, and a
commitment to presenting accurate, well-rounded perspectives. Media practitioners must grapple
with these dynamics to ensure their reporting remains fair and informative in a divided society.10

8
Thomas Jefferson, “Freedom of the Press and the Right to Privacy,” The Lawyers & Jurists, accessed October 9,
2023, https://www.lawyersnjurists.com/article/freedom-of-the-press-and-the-right-to-privacy/.
9
Bonai Fan et al., “Why Do You Trust News? The Event-Related Potential Evidence of Media Channel and News
Type,” Frontiers, March 15, 2021, accessed October 9, 2023,
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663485/full,5-6.
10
Emmanuel Perilla, “Objectivity in the Media,” Medium, November 5, 2018, accessed October 9, 2023,
https://medium.com/journalism-and-society/objectivity-in-the-media-56e00f50ee2.
 4.7. LACK OF RESOURCES
Budget constraints and staffing limitations can pose significant challenges for media
organizations. These resource limitations may hinder their capacity to conduct rigorous fact-
checking and in-depth research, potentially compromising the quality and accuracy of their
reporting. When media outlets lack the financial means to invest in investigative journalism or
employ an adequate number of experienced journalists, they may resort to cost-cutting measures
that affect the thoroughness of their work. In this constrained environment, media practitioners
must find innovative ways to uphold their commitment to truthful reporting, even as they grapple
with the constraints imposed by limited resources.
4.8. BALANCING SENSATIONALISM AND OBJECTIVITY
In the media industry, the quest for higher viewership or readership often exerts pressure to
generate attention-grabbing content. This drive can tempt media outlets to resort to
sensationalism or click bait headlines that prioritize shock value over objective reporting. As a
result, the pursuit of truth can be overshadowed by the imperative to capture the audience's
attention. This challenge underscores the delicate balancing act faced by media practitioners,
who must maintain a commitment to objectivity and the presentation of facts while meeting the
demands of a competitive media landscape. Striking this balance is vital to uphold journalistic
integrity and ensure that information remains reliable and credible.11
4.9. NAVIGATING TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES
The emergence of advanced technologies, such as deep fakes, presents a daunting challenge
for media practitioners. Deep fakes can create hyper-realistic yet entirely fabricated audio or
video content, making it increasingly difficult to differentiate between genuine and manipulated
material. This technology's potential for spreading false narratives or misinformation poses a
significant threat to the accuracy and trustworthiness of media content. Media practitioners must
adapt by developing new tools and strategies to detect and authenticate digital content, and they
must educate their audiences on the existence and potential dangers of deep fakes. Navigating
this evolving technological landscape is imperative for maintaining the integrity and credibility
of journalism.12
4.10. PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS
Public expectations regarding what constitutes the truth can vary widely, influenced by
diverse perspectives, beliefs, and biases. Media practitioners encounter the challenge of
balancing these divergent expectations while upholding journalistic standards. They must strive
to provide accurate and objective reporting that serves the public interest, even when facing
pressure to cater to specific segments of the audience. This means navigating a complex

11
Ben Frampton, “Clickbait: The Changing Face of Online Journalism,” BBC News, September 14, 2015, accessed
October 9, 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-34213693.
12
Brit Mccandless Farmer, “The Impact of Deep fakes: How Do You Know When a Video Is Real?,” CBS News,
2021, accessed October 9, 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/deepfakes-real-fake-videos-60-minutes-2021-10-
10/.
landscape where some viewers may interpret factual reporting as biased or false due to their
preconceptions. Successfully managing these expectations involves a commitment to fairness,
impartiality, and a dedication to delivering well-rounded, fact-based content to ensure that
journalism remains a reliable source of information for all.13

5. SOLUTIONS TO THE ISSUES THAT JOURNALISTS FACE IN LIGHT OF THE

TENSION BETWEEN REPORTING THE TRUTH AND DISSEMINATING FALSE
INFORMATION

Media professionals face numerous challenges in distinguishing between truthfulness and

falsehood. Here are some potential solutions to these challenges:

5.1. FACT-CHECKING

Rigorous fact-checking is a fundamental journalistic practice that safeguards the accuracy and
credibility of news reports. It entails a thorough process of cross-referencing information with
multiple trustworthy sources, enabling journalists to verify the truth of claims, statements, or
events before they are disseminated to the public, thereby upholding the integrity of journalism.

5.2. TRANSPARENCY

Transparency in media outlets is essential for fostering trust with the audience. By openly
sharing their sources, methods, and decision-making processes, media organizations provide a
clear view into their journalistic practices. This transparency enables the audience to comprehend
how news stories are developed and validated, reinforcing the credibility and accountability of
the media.

5.3. MEDIA LITERACY EDUCATION

Educating the public about media literacy can help them critically evaluate the information they
consume and understand the difference between credible news and misinformation.

5.4. USE OF TECHNOLOGY

Technology can be used to detect fake news and deep fakes. For example, artificial intelligence
(AI) can be used to analyze the authenticity of digital content.

13
David Brewer, “David Brewer,” Media Helping Media, accessed October 9, 2023,
https://mediahelpingmedia.org/ethics/fairness-in-journalism/.
 5.5. ETHICAL STANDARDS

Adhering to high standards of ethics, accountability, legality, and credibility is essential for
media professionalism. This includes respecting rights such as freedom of expression and
information.

5.6. AVOIDING SENSATIONALISM

Media outlets should avoid sensationalism and click bait headlines that prioritize shock value
over objective reporting. Instead, they should focus on providing accurate, well-rounded
perspectives.

5.7. BUILDING TRUST AND LOYALTY

With the influx of fake media and fake news available and making headlines, media outlets must
establish credibility with viewers1. Misreporting the facts or misrepresenting what was said can
hurt a network’s credibility overall1.

5.8. ADAPTING TO CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES

Media practitioners must adapt to evolving technologies by developing new tools and strategies
to detect and authenticate digital content. They must also educate their audiences on the
existence and potential dangers of deep fakes.14

6. CONCLUSION

Media practitioners face numerous challenges in the information dissemination landscape,

including the spread of misinformation, 24/7 news cycles, cognitive biases, legal and ethical
constraints, public trust preservation, growing social polarization, resource limitations,
sensationalism, and deep fake technology. They must navigate legal and ethical constraints,
preserve public trust, and operate in an environment of growing social polarization. Their
commitment to truth-telling is not only a professional duty but also a service to society, ensuring
the integrity of journalism and reliable information for the public.

Danielle Chazen, “4 Challenges in the Media Industry & Their Technological Solutions,” Verbit, accessed
14

October 9, 2023, https://verbit.ai/challenges-in-the-media-industry/.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bradshaw, Paul. “How to Prevent Confirmation Bias Affecting Your Journalism.” Online
Journalism Blog. Last modified August 10, 2022. Accessed October 9, 2023.

Brewer, David. “David Brewer.” Media Helping Media. Last modified July 5, 2023. Accessed
October 9, 2023. https://mediahelpingmedia.org/ethics/fairness-in-journalism/.

Chazen, Danielle. “4 Challenges in the Media Industry & Their Technological Solutions.”
Verbit. Last modified 2023. Accessed October 9, 2023. https://verbit.ai/challenges-in-the-
media-industry/.

Fan, Bonai, Sifang Liu, Guanxiong Pei, Yufei Wu, and Lian Zhu. “Why Do You Trust News?
The Event-Related Potential Evidence of Media Channel and News Type.” Frontiers.
Frontiers, March 15, 2021. Last modified March 15, 2021. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663485/full.

Frampton, Ben. “Clickbait: The Changing Face of Online Journalism.” BBC News. BBC,
September 14, 2015. Last modified September 14, 2015. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-34213693.

https://onlinejournalismblog.com/2020/04/07/how-to-prevent-confirmation-bias-affecting-your-
journalism/.

Jefferson, Thomas. “Freedom of the Press and the Right to Privacy.” The Lawyers & Jurists.
Last modified 2019. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://www.lawyersnjurists.com/article/freedom-of-the-press-and-the-right-to-privacy/.

Marwick, Alice, and Rebecca Lewis. Media Manipulation and Disinformation

Online. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Data and Society Research Institute, 2017.

McCarthy, Bill. “Fact Checks of 10 Prominent Types of Misinformation about COVID-19

Vaccines.” Poynter. Last modified July 26, 2021. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/fact-checks-of-10-prominent-types-of-
misinformation-about-covid-19-vaccines/.

Perilla, Emmanuel. “Objectivity in the Media.” Medium. Journalism and Society, November 5,
2018. Last modified November 5, 2018. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://medium.com/journalism-and-society/objectivity-in-the-media-56e00f50ee2.

Philipose, Pamela. “Backstory: The Hathras Gangrape and Four Media Challenges .” The Wire.
Last modified October 10, 2020. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://thewire.in/media/backstory-hathras-gangrape-four-media-challenges.
Saisho, Reiko. “Speed vs. Accuracy in Time of Crisis.” Reuters Institute for the Study of
Journalism. Last modified 2020. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/speed-vs-accuracy-time-crisis.

Ullah, Mozibur. “The Truth-Falsehood Dichotomy and Logic.” Philosophy Stack Exchange. Last
modified October 1, 1960. Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/14373/the-truth-falsehood-dichotomy-
and-logic.