Gen IV U-Tenn Presentation
Gen IV U-Tenn Presentation
Gen IV U-Tenn Presentation
David J. Diamond Brookhaven National Laboratory Energy Sciences and Technology Department Nuclear Energy and Infrastructure Systems Division Presented at the University of Tennessee April 30, 2003
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
n
Introduction to the Gen IV (long-term) Nuclear Energy Systems The Roadmap - how we got to the Gen IV concepts The Not-Gen IV Nuclear Energy Systems aka the international near-term deployment concepts What do the Gen IV concepts look like; what are some of their R&D needs
n n
Slide 2
Fuel Cycle
Size
Applications
R&D
Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) Lead-alloy Fast Reactor (LFR) Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR) Very High Temp. Gas Reactor (VHTR) Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR) Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)
Slide 4
Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) Lead-alloy Fast Reactor (LFR) Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR) Very High Temp. Gas Reactor (VHTR) Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR) Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)
Slide 5
Large
Large
Discusses the benefits, goals and challenges, and the importance of the fuel cycle Describes evaluation and selection process Introduces the six Generation IV systems chosen by the Generation IV International Forum Surveys system-specific R&D needs for all six systems Collects crosscutting R&D needs GIF countries will choose the systems they will work on Programs and projects will be founded on the R&D surveyed in the roadmap Information available at gif.inel.gov/roadmap/
n n
n n n n
Slide 6
TECHNOLOGY GOALS
n
Sustainability
1. Provide sustainable energy generation that meets clean air objectives and promotes long-term availability of systems and effective fuel utilization for worldwide energy production 2. Minimize and manage their nuclear waste and notably reduce the long term stewardship burden, thereby improving protection for the public health and the environment
Slide 7
TECHNOLOGY GOALS
n
Economics
6. Will have a clear life-cycle cost advantage over other energy sources 7. Will have a level of financial risk comparable to other energy projects
Slide 8
Deployment by 2015 Industry involvement Improvement over current advanced LWR performance Advanced Boiling Water Reactors ABWR-II ESBWR SWR-1000 HC-BWR Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors GT-MHR PBMR
Slide 9
Advanced Pressure Tube Reactor ACR-700 Advanced Pressurized Water Reactors AP-600 AP-1000 APR-1400 APWR+ EPR Integral Primary System Reactors CAREM IMR IRIS SMART
Slide 10
Very High Temp. Gas Reactor (VHTR) Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR) Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR) Lead-alloy Fast Reactor (LFR) Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)
Slide 11
VHTR GFR
PMR
Slide 12
Hydrogen demand is already large and growing rapidly Heavy-oil refining consumes 5% of natural gas for hydrogen production Energy security and environmental quality motivate hydrogen as an alternative to oil as a transportation fuel Zero-emissions Distributed energy opportunity
Water is the preferred hydrogen fuel Electrolysis using off-peak power High-temperature electrolysis High-temperature thermochemical water splitting
Slide 13
Slide 14
Refueling Floor
Reactor Pressure Vessel Cross Vessel (Contains Hot & Cold Duct) 46m(151ft) Power Conversion System Vessel Shutdown Cooling System Piping Floors Typical 32m(105ft)
Slide 15
GT-MHR
7m(23 ft) Cold leg Core Coolant Upper Plenum
Refueling Stand Pipe Control Rod Drive Assembly Control Rod Guide tubes Upper Core Restraint Structure Central Reflector Graphite Control Rods 23.7m(78ft) Cross Vessel Nipple Hot Duct Structural Element Core Inlet Flow Annular shaped Active Core Outer Side Reflector Graphite
Upper plenum hot plume mixing - LOF Core depressurized cooldown Flow between hotter/ cooler channels - LOF Lower plenum - hot jet mixing
Slide 16
Core Outlet Flow 2.2m(7ft) Hot Duct Insulation Module Metallic Core Support Structure
Insulation Layer for Metallic Core Support Plate Shutdown Cooling System Module
Calculation of the coolant channel temperatures during normal operation Significant local variations in power occur across the core due the non-uniform location of the reflectors, control rods, and burnable poison assemblies and due to the fuel loading Power variations are amplified in the hot channels due to the buoyancy resistance Therefore the coolant temperatures can vary by more than + or - 200C from the average Calculation of the core lower plenum flow mixing and pressure drop Hot jet mixing, complex 3-dimensional flow around the core supports, and the flow acceleration near the hot duct need to be calculated Calculation of the hot duct coolant mixing and insulation effectiveness Permeation of the hot gas into the insulation is a concern The entrance conditions are somewhat uncertain, but the flow must be well mixed by the time it reaches the turbine
Slide 17
Thermal-hydraulic Issues
Thrust Bearing
Mixing of the gases during bypass events Flow distributions among the recuperators and recuperator efficiency
34m(112ft)
PCS Vessel Recouperator 8.2m(27ft) Dia. Vessel Flange Turbine Cold Gas to Reactor Hot Gas from Reactor High Pressure Compressor Recouperator
Precooler/ Intercooler
Slide 18
Rejection of the heat by natural convection and thermal radiation from the reactor pressure vessel outer wall to the passive cooling system Local effects around the hot duct need to be considered Some separate effects proof testing may be needed Reliability, robustness, and effectiveness of the Reactor Cavity Cooling System Flow through the core during a loss of circulation accident Up flow in the hot channels and down flow in the cool channels results in hot plumes in the upper plenum The hot and cold channel flow distribution and the upper plenum mixing are uncertain Low Reynolds number flow with turbulent, transitional, and/or laminar flow, buoyancy effects, and gas property variations Core cool down during a LOCA Air or water ingress during a LOCA
Slide 19
n n
n n
Slide 20
ADVANTAGES OF GFR
n
GFRs share the sustainability attributes of fast reactors Effective fissioning of Pu and minor actinides Ability to operate on wide range of fuel compositions (dirty fuel) Capacity for breeding excess fissile material Advantages offered by use of He coolant Ease of in-service inspection Chemical inertness Very small coolant void reactivity (<eff) Potential for very high temperature and direct cycle conversion High temperature potential opens possibilities for new applications, including hydrogen production
Slide 21
Safety case difficult with low thermal inertia and poor heat transfer properties of coolant Reliance on active and semi-passive systems for decay heat removal Passive reactivity shutdown is also targeted
High actinide-density fuels capable of withstanding high temperature and fast fluence Modified coated particle or dispersion type fuels, e.g., (U,TRU)C/SiC (U,TRU)N/TiN Fuel pins with high-temperature cladding, e.g., infiltrated kernel particle
Core structural materials for high temperature and fast-neutron fluence conditions (ceramics, composites, refractory alloys)
Slide 22
GFR Metal or ceramic matrix (similar to prismatic) Pin, plate types (ceramic, metallic) Pebble/particle
Core Lay-out
Core Vessel
Slide 23
n n
Reactor
Recirculation system
Turbine/Generator Reactor
Slide 25
Slide 26
Considerations with core design Large change in density axially Average coolant density higher than in BWR Downward flow in water rods Other moderators (BeO, ZrH2) Square or hexagonal geometry
Fuel assembly
nSafety
Water rod
Slide 27
Slide 30
Demonstration of passive safety design: providing assurance that the physical phenomena and related design features relied upon to achieve passive safety are adequately characterized Axial fuel expansion and radial core expansion Experimental data plus deterministic models required for accurate core representation (particularly, minor-actinide-bearing fuels) Reduce uncertainties in T-H quantities by using more detailed models - Multi-pin subassembly, full assembly-by-assembly, coupled neutronicsthermal-hydraulic calculation - Accurate duct-wall and load pad temperatures required for calculating bending moments in each subassembly to characterize core restraint and expansion - CFD tools for benchmark calculations or routine design calculations? Self-activated shutdown systems Passive decay heat removal systems CFD models useful for resolution of complex natural circulation flow paths
Slide 31
Accommodation of extremely low probability but higher consequence accident scenarios Demonstrate that passive mechanisms exist to preclude recriticality in a damaged reactor Show that debris from fuel failure is coolable within the reactor vessel Implication for safety analysis tools Requires analytical and experimental investigations of mechanisms that will ensure passively safe response to bounding events that lead to fuel damage e.g., out-of-pile experiments involving reactor materials are recommended for metal fuels Local feedback and material motion modeling required
Slide 32
Low Neutron Absorption and Slowing Down Power Allow to open the lattice, increase coolant volume fraction absent a neutronics penalty pumping requirements also dictate open lattice Facilitates natural circulation High Boiling Temperature at Atmospheric Pressure (~1700C) Unpressurized primary (precludes loss of coolant accident initiator) Margins are available to employ passive safety based on thermo/structural feedbacks Potential to raise core outlet temperature (~800C suitable for H2 production and other process heat missions) Non-vigorous reaction with air and water Potential to simplify heat transport circuits Potential to simplify refueling approaches
Slide 34
Purified Salt
621C
Steam Generator
Critically Safe, Passively Cooled Dump Tanks (Emergency Cooling and Shutdown)
Slide 35