Estoppel
Estoppel
Estoppel
History
By: WILL KENTON (Updated August 14, 2024)
Reviewed by : ROBERT C. KELLY
What Is Estoppel?
Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents someone from arguing something
or asserting a right that contradicts what they previously agreed to or said.
Put simply, estoppel prevents one person from contradicting an action or
statement from the past.
Common law is a legal system in which laws are derived from judicial
decisions and precedent. Almost all countries with a judicial system based on
common law—including the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States
—have incorporated multiple forms of the doctrine of estoppel in their laws.
While the names of the principles differ from country to country, the concept
is essentially the same: consistency matters, in both words and actions.
Estoppel ensures that a person stays true to their word and doesn't unfairly
damage someone else. So if Person A must adhere to their word if they make
a promise to Person B and later rescind it. Estoppel can take many different
forms, the most common of which are listed below.
Page 1 of 4
Types of Estoppel
There are different types of estoppel. The following are some of the most
common ones found in the legal arena.
Lease terms, including the start and end dates of the lease
The date of the last rent payment
Confirmation that the lease is up to date or highlights what any defaults
were made by either party
A statement verifying that no modifications were made to the lease or
details of any changes made and when
Page 2 of 4
Example of Estoppel
Promissory estoppel was the heart of a case pitting two neighbors against
one another in Iowa. A farmer leased property from his neighbor, who he said
promised to sell him his farm at some point in the future for $3,000 an acre.1
The farmer then made substantial improvements to the property during the
term of the lease, with the expectation that he would become its eventual
owner. But the owner sold the property to a third party, prompting his
neighbor to file a lawsuit, saying he had the right to purchase the farm.1
At the trial, the jury awarded the farmer $52,000 in damages to cover the
improvements made to the property. Eventually, the case found its way to the
Iowa Court of Appeals, which ruled that the option for the farmer to purchase
the farm did not need to be included in the written lease agreement to be
valid. The court stated that there was a clear and definite promise along with
the neighbor's understanding that the farmer was relying on that promise. As
such, the property owner was ordered to pay the farmer damages.1
Page 3 of 4
by record, estoppel by deed, laches, estoppel by silence, and reliance-based
estoppel.
Page 4 of 4